The Short Time I Had With My Kitten, Baby

January 17, 2015 1 comment

BabyMy Baby

So, with a loan from an acquaintance I got $100 to use on my cat at the vet, and spent it all yesterday on her. I wanted to comment about this experience I had just now, which was force feeding her cat food since she couldn’t eat due to her having pierced either side of her tongue with her teeth when I, I reason, let her bite at my sleeves when I let her out soon after having caught her two or three days ago. What I wanted to comment on was that despite me having tube-bottle fed her about an hour ago and her gagging and screaming briefly at times when choking, and her sort of begging me I suppose to stop, and letting her down – that when I let her down on my sleeping bag at one point, she was purring and kneading it! She either realized I was trying to help her eat, and realized with her God-given intelligence that I wasn’t causing her pain on purpose and/or felt satisfied with what little food I was able to feed her. But it is also amazing that even if she thought I was causing her such great pain on purpose, that she after such great pain, and her having yellow mucous clogging her nose (and me wiping it away at times) that she would be euphoric seconds later, still sick, still in pain, still hardly having eaten!

At first I thought the holes in her mouth was my fault, if it did happen by letting her bite my sleeves or sleeve (though she was biting an animal-toy I put in the cage too – 1/18/2015 I just realized as of updating this post that she had bitten her tongue while still in her cage from the expression she gave me before I had taken her out of the cage – and indication she was able to eat well before as there was a full can inside that had been devoured and when I put in another she began to eat that one too – which was when she stuck it out at one point, which is only something a cat will do if they are comfortable, with the exception of what I am describing now or some disease), but it could have easily just has happened had I taken the long way of letting her get used to me over the weeks, because it is just as possible that when trying to pet her for the first time even after having waited many days, letting her bite my sleeve or some toy, that she would have pierced her tongue anyways. In a way I could argue I sped things up so that this will be unlikely to happen again. I performed surgery on the right side of her tongue because I saw it was a thread nearly on the right side of the right hole on her tongue and was causing her great pain when moving her tongue. I think it was getting caught on her teeth and getting repeatedly stretch on her food or teeth, and it looked yellow white, clearly infected, so I use a knife and scissors to cut it off. It looks as if a lot of material got destroyed on that side of her tongue though, as if something had taken a big bite out of her tongue.

I still owe the vet $16 (1/18/2015 – it now stands at $200 or more in multiple a last ditch attempts I made to save her life, not getting any sleep for days and in my last attempt biking early in the morning in freezing cold with only a shirt on on a brakeless bike using my jackets to shield her from the cold and warming her against my belly, but was told it was a lost cause and she likely had massive infection and dual kidney failure – would have been over $400 and I was perfectly willing, but the vet seeing my condition was looking for something less expensive and injected her with saline rather than keeping her overnight at my request, and my Wells Fargo debt card repeatedly rejected even a small down payment anyways). But imagine this cat had been stolen from me after all these, and slandered or treated callously as had the security guard at Vons and UNLV sorority girls and campus police there, acting as if I was an abuser by whoever stole it, or aiding the thief, can you understand how I feel about my stolen cats and kittens when you think of it that way? What I mean is, I suffered hard and long, I long-suffered, I slaved over my cats and kittens, and yet had them stolen from me and was slandered as having abused them, and called an animal abuser by these thieves. How can a pet thief taking this young cat I rescued (who was bony to begin with and sick), stealing that kitten from me after I had painstakingly performed surgery on her, gotten slimed with cat food repeatedly in very cold weather, in a dirty abandoned house where feces used to be on the rug (which I removed in the room I had done surgery in), dirty with dust, having gotten my own saliva all over me from biting onto a bicycle flashlight to see what I was doing including while feeding her, and then someone is going to call me in their self righteousness a cat abuser and steal her? How can such a thief not be executed or lashed hard 40 times in public as at least a partial punishment for such even acts, such arrogance, such carelessness, such thoughtlessness, such callous behavior for the life of the animal they stole and the owner whom they slandered, who is in great pain, suffering from psoriasis non-stop from the stress of endless oppression, endless harassment, decades of memories of abuse and sorrowful experiences, having been suicidal from abuse as a child and in adulthood, suicidal for at least 10 years, and someone is going to take my pet away because they assume that based on their glance-judgment, they know better than me, and because they see me who looks poor, must therefore be a bad person or have inferior morals, wisdom or judgment, or because I disagree with some opinion of theirs, one they presumed was right in their arrogance of believing they are superior for whatever reason? Such thieves, such slanderers should be executed.

11/18/2015 At 6 AM I got her to the vet, and I took her home when the doctor gave me a dire judgment, and about 7 AM my little angel after spending hours in extreme pain, died in my arms. God decided to take her away from Hellish world early, away from the self-centered citizens of Las Vegas and the rest of the world, who treated her as a homeless person, like dirt, even though pretending to be loving, kind, good or decent.

Baby Angel 0118150235i

I’ll always love you, I’ll miss your purrs, your kneading when you were happy, your head rubs, and wonder what could have been.

Jan 28 Update: (If you would like to fund my life and those of my kittens and cats – and that includes helping me get the $s pay off my $100+ vetrinarian debt for the rescued kitten that died – please sign up for free Speedcoins, which is an alternative cryptocurrency/digital currency to Bitcoins, you can also get free Speedcoins, 110 of them as I just did in a few minutes by signing up and installing a Speedcoin wallet on my Android tablet. You don’t need a credit card or give out your email. Just click here to sign up.)

Something the Rich Know About Illegal Immigration

January 11, 2015 Leave a comment

I was thinking about Mexicans again, as there are more and more of them showing up in Vegas, and it occurred to me it would be disasterous to suddenly remove them all. I realized this as it is said and it seems to be true, that whites avoid doing the slave-labor type jobs, as in bathroom-cleaning, farm work, the really hard and gross work, the humiliating work. Not all whites are like that, and there may be a practical reason they avoid the really hard manual labor, and it may be their physical design, as in they are literally not built for hard labor in general. Supposing I’m wrong, the fact is they are not the ones filling in those jobs galore, it’s the Mexicans and to some degree the blacks, though Mexicans are flooding such job areas. Yes, whites can fend for themselves, they don’t need slaves, they don’t need another race to fill in, but it’s beneficial to their race. Whites have even enslaved other whites. I was also thinking of how the white and black populations, and other native populations, including Mexican require an ever expanding hard labor work force to keep food coming into the grocery stores. In other words as more and more babies are made, as the population expands, more mouths need to be fed and so laborers need to be imported if there aren’t any native persons willing to or able to fill in those jobs. The immigration laws of America apparently cannot cope with the rapidly increasing population of the country, as in that requirement for more or replacment labor (replacement because no doubt many doing the hard labor jobs die on the job, get badly injured or sick, become too old to work or can’t take the stress anymore and try and find some other better job, and some return to their country). So the wealthy and the farm owners and so on who require cheap labor to make a decent profit to keep their fellow citizens fed or serviced in some way, not being able to find it among America’s natives, wait for more illegals to hire. So, can you see how it would be a disaster if suddenly all the illegals were to be sent home or out of the country? Who would then work the farms, the road contruction jobs, the cleaning and organizing jobs, or the backroom fast food jobs? Are there enough whites and asians (which are actually a sort of “white” person, even Mexicans and Native Americans are a variant of a white person, genetically) to fill in right away? And what would even be the point of say, legally importing a huge amount of asians in and giving them instant citizenship? Why not do that with the illegals? Many would argue these illegals refuse to learn the native language and are criminal and so would eventually collapse the country. Would it lead to a full collapse, and in what way? What would the Mexican laborers do, suddenly form their own country on farm lands and say, “We don’t need the money of the whites, the money will come from our fellow Mexicans here!” Why and how would such an absurd scenario come about? What is apparent is that it is simply “life” that America’s demographics are rapidly changing, that various races, Mexicans especially, are flooding in, and that it is necessary for whites, asians and other established races, including other Mexicans, to survive or keep their level of living, however good or poor it is. The Bible implies that one day foreigners will return to their native lands any ways, after God kills off hundreds of millions of people during a severe phase of punishment (the seven seals puinshment) when God is punishing the anti-Christ and those who follow/followed him. As for the criminals coming in with the non-criminals, what of it, criminals will always sneak, white or otherwise, it’s apart of life. Advise to Christians: don’t get entangled in the affairs of the world, don’t heavily invest yourself in the subject of whether or not illegals should be whatever country, and remember that the Bible says to welcome strangers, to be hospitable to them, to treat them as fellow citizens and to love them as neighbors, including the ones just passing through.

It may be that President Obama isn’t trying to destroy America by granting amnesty to the illegals, but trying to save it, or, trying to create a new America, one with less racism.

Why Not To Trust Drug Addicts At All and Why Not To Live or Visit Vegas

December 15, 2014 2 comments

Some of you who come to this blog probably wonder why I haven’t written in it for a long time. I’ll try to explain briefly:

unreliable backstabbing drug addicts and police harassment. How is that for brief? I’ve been living in a Hellworld called Las Vegas, where police harass those who look poor and homeless, especially on the Las Vegas Strip, making it impossible for them to not be homeless, as they’ve repeatedly done to me. They ignore obvious pan handlers if they are dressed in costumes mostly, but the homeless they often harass, especially those with pets. Meanwhile they ignore the tourists with pets, showing that these police are criminals, rather than professionals persons doing their job. You can’t for example, ignore one murder because that murderer is dressed nice and from a foreign country, but only deal with the local murderer, because he looks poor, or has a cat with him, if you do, you yourself are a criminal. My cats have been repeatedly stolen from me, first five, one ran off and probably stolen, ran off when a homeless man punched me in the head just cuz, and knowing he could injure the kitten/cat. The last one I had, I’d been ticketed for having twice at the Strip, by the same evil cops, and a previous ticket from the same ones even for the white kitten that had been ran off. So, three tickets from the same group of bullies calling themselves police. That last kitten had been stolen with the help of a security guard at Vons, at first I thought she stole it, but then I found out from the thieves themselves that she permitted them, giving her blessing so to speak, to steal it. This is a guard who called me insane for saying I wanted to breed cats and me saying that there were researchers who showed that there is no cat overpopulation problem. Months earlier she had told me, “I hate people, that’s why I keep to myself.” This guard is so wicked, that when I started to leave Vons after buying cat food, she, after having not spoken to me for months for me saying what I did to her, all of the sudden said, “Hi, how’s it going?” Can anyone say, “NARCISSIST”? I’d call her a psychopath but psychopaths could care less about animals as she passionately did, however her “care” was a twisted narcissistic care. If she truly loved animals, she would not “hate everyone” as in the owners who care for them too, nor randomly permitted total strangers (who by the way were homeless meth addicts, the one who directly stole however was half-homeless) to steal my kitten. She also lied to the police about what happened, and made up absurd lies like me being in a long line. Adding to her stupidity was her thinking she could lecture me in her stupid assumptions about how to take care of the kitten AFTER she’d permitted him to be stolen. A narcissist by the way is almost identical to a psychopath, the only difference being a narcissist is delusional in how important they are, and has a very tiny conscience. Hence why this guard was gulping in fear when she saw I was truly concerned for this kitten, rather than having what in her stupid, petty, twisted and presumptuous mind: no concern at all. She thought in other words, I’d say nothing and let it go, but she saw I could get her fired instead, and she realized her dumb mistake. She knows by now that if I press charges against her and so on, I could destroy her career, and she could end up homeless herself, as she deserves. And consider she did this with Christmas close ahead AND WHEN I WAS BUYING THIS HUNGRY KITTEN FOOD. How did she know if they would feed him right away or not, if they had the money, if they weren’t morons who’d feed him dog food, which lacks taurine that cats need, and on and on? That’s the “care”, the “love” or a narcissist. It is false care, false concern, false love.

It was obvious to me this evil woman played some part in the disappearance of my kitten, as she refused to tell me if there was an outside camera and refused to let me call 311.

Update 12/18/2014:

So, yesterday I got scammed by a smooth talking druggie who stole my bluetooth keyboard, portable battery and the sim card my Trio AXS 4G tablet after locking it! She also cost me making $20 that night. I came across her when she was pretending to be in distress over $40 being stolen from her, and me not realizing she was yet another untrustworthy drug addict fell for her charm and smooth talking. She was showing signs of being a narcissist rapidly, but me thinking she was just uppity and eccentric in my weariness and looking for a friend overlooked it. She quickly began having angry outbursts when I didn’t want to participate in her scams or let her do whatever with my tablet and and she took off angrily when I told her my portable battery went missing. Ironically she delayed me so that by chance I acquired a phone, legally. One of the bizarre signs she was mentally ill was claiming, even in front of others, that because I (merely) TOUCHED her phone that that was why it has cracked, a phone she tried to sell me IN THE DARK OF NIGHT which she knew was already cracked no doubt. A guy I suspect is a meth user had stolen my bike afterwards that night and replaced the pedals with clip pedals and ripped the front light off (he’s not a bike user and no doubt wanted the light for himself). He was no doubt going to sell the bike, however I caught him with it and despite knowing my hellish experiences here and the events of the thefts that night made up/implied that a crazy drug addict (a real one who tried to assault and mug me) was the one who gave it to him. This moron made me argue very long with him for it back, even tried to make me give him the wheel I’d removed as a precaution, and when I recorded him arguing with me he demanded the camera in exchange to give to the crazy addict so that he wouldn’t get beat by him (just forget that that addict, he claimed thought of him as an uncle and that that was why he wouldn’t beat him when angry). And btw, all three of these fools I’m talking about were obvious narcissists, including the gf of the crazed one whom he broke up with right after trying to, or feigning to fight me some nights ago. The one with the bike by the way, while scamming me with a fake check he got me to deposit and putting me $412 in debt, said to me with an angry hateful voice over me already having spent my share and not having anything left for him to use that I’d f’d it all off including by sharing some with others (I told him I had) and he furiously replied “I’m the only one that matters!” So while he was holding my bike wanting something for it I’d told him I’d stopped talking about that (betrayal) of his (and his claiming smoothly afterwards when I brought up that he’d ruined my bank account that that was all my fault and I couldn’t blame him at all – not even for him calling me a retard for not helping that scammer a second time huh?), I finally, and no doubt since I recorded him, got him to give up his stolen prize. Consider that yesterday night was very cold and I was stuck with two heavy bags and an injury to my right shoulder from having chased what I thought were the thieves who stole my kitten on a stolen scooter, which is yet another hellish thread. But so after biking away came across the usual druggies, including the one who wanted his stolen scooter back, who foolishly after tracking the thieves down, listened to their sweet talk and let them disappear with it again. And that night I witnessed a drug deal gone bad – a marijuana grower/dealer was robbed of much weed and the thief in the car tried to speed off even as the seller held on to the car! Before all that had happened, just as the two were entering the parking lot where the theft occurred, one had suddenly stopped in front of the dealer’s car (he was riding in it as a passenger that is) and screeched quickly into the lot). The people in the car with the dealer and some other guy, a guy who was a witness or whose car was hit too was standing around, perhaps exchanging insurance info. Then tonight I found one of the druggies in my sleeping bag in his usual cranky mood. He claimed the girl (who was one of the druggie thieves that stole my kitten) had given him my sleeping bag. It was his birthday, so I let him be, knowing that he might disappear with it or leave it around where it would get stolen. And that is only SOME of the troubling stressful events I’d been through in the past few days. The large amount of druggies I encounter here by the way all show signs of being narcissists or sociopaths, except maybe two or three. Ive found that those who heavily use heroine, meth, weed and alcohol are usually narcissists or sociopaths. A sociopath as I define it is someone with a burned out conscience and little to no fear of God. Don’t trust anyone who sells prescription drugs, heroine or weed either.

Meanwhile, I lost a mini SD card with a lot of good footage of the craziness here and a 64 gig USB drive I was using to back up my laptop and which I’d transferred a large amount of data too, meaning if I don’t find it, I’m going to have to do data recovery, sigh. On top of that, it seems my laptop’s hard drive is defective now from I suppose my laptop having had a few falls recently.

Why Linda Moulton Howe’s Theory Is Wrong About Ancient and Modern Aliens

August 31, 2014 Leave a comment

For people the millions, not billions of people with common sense, mainly Christians and those with a decent Christian upbringing and who haven’t gone atheist (which causes a loss of common sense) this article may seem a huge waste of time, but I’m both bored and very angry at Linda for perpetuating what is in excusable for her level of intelligence and wealth, and she clearly isn’t poor to be able to travel the world and hobnob with archeologist Schoch and interview many people for long hours. So, she’s obviously not some homeless drug addict with problems keeping her information together, lacking resting and research time and doing accurate research and note collecting therefore.

Linda, I have noticed, like many so called “researchers”, without any logical explanation, rejects evidence that her theories and logic are wrong regardless of how well such arguments or evidence is presented to them. And how many people these days have an excuse for being ignorant with such a useful and effective research tool as Google? Who is going to be able to say to God, in this age, unless living in North Korea and so on, “I had no way of knowing, I was totally distracted, no one told me, I had no time to think carefully.”? Though many could say this at various times in their life, if they lived to say 16 or 30, would any of those excuses be valid at all points in their life? Could a 16 year old say, “I never had time to consider if me pilfering and lying often might lead to an eternity in this so called Hell I lived in, and never had time to consider what Hell was about and who came up with the idea. I never considered how pilfering and lying to me all the time would destroy me, and therefore should not be done at all as to do it to others would likely lead back to destroying myself or making me a miserable person, and that therefore I should have done the opposite.” Likewise what excuses does Linda have for rejecting the evidence against the Big Bang, evolution, global warming/(disastrous long term) climate change (her claims of aliens doing this and that and why, all of which she speaks up repeatedly as fact in various ways? Her only excuse would be the common ones, including “Satan was blinding me, deluding me.”

Linda does not give any clear evidence for her claims on those subjects, she comes up with anonymous witnesses or witnesses who can’t verify their identity despite claiming to be General Zod So and So or ex-CIA official of the whatever project, and yet speaks of her interviewees as if they were totally credible, and in her last show on Coast to Coast AM gave a dead give away as to her wrong methodology of determining the truth of what she has heard and believes, she said, “I feel as if I am getting closer to the truth.” SHE FEELS? New Age Hippie talk! You don’t FEEL if you are getting to the close with Grand Unified Theory or complex math or much of anything in the world unless you were a poorly raised person who was taught New Age garbage as a way of getting through life. You don’t FEEL how to operate an ipod, as in with your heart, you use your brain, mind and REASON IT OUT, you have specific thoughts, you don’t use your heart mainly, unless, again, you were raised with poor reasoning methods to figure out many things in life. As is CLEAR, super clear from this world, to do that leads to endless fights, wars, divorces, misunderstandings and arguments. YOU REASON THINGS OUT WITH YOUR MIND WITH SPECIFIC THOUGHTS, not vague feelings. The heart is absolutely useful for living life happily and impossible to without it, but it is not to be the main mind with which we reason the truth out. The heart is a feelings machine, it doesn’t have specific thoughts, it can’t, it wasn’t designed for that, it wasn’t designed to reason, and even if it does have some reasoning ability, it would be highly prone to error in our corrupted state, a state in which all of the humans here on Earth are addicted to doing wrong or have lingering addictions for doing so, such as Christians God has forgiven. Because of our desire to disobey God, to go our own way, a problem which our heart is in large part responsible for, hearts which steer us away from logical reasoning and logical acts, we cannot rely at all on feelings MAINLY to determine what is true or not, and yet Linda consistently uses a naive feelings-based method of determining true from false. She’s even inexplicably oblivious to her own findings. For example the biggest of all I see is that though she knows “mainstream science”, more accurately “mainstream scientists” reject her alien theories and many at least publicly say aliens aren’t here or likely never have been, and reject things absurdly, why then does she have utter and absolute trust in them when they claim “such and such is billions of years old” (and consider the outrageous length of time a billion let alone million years is) and regardless of that extraordinary claim of length of time passing, she takes their word for it without a care if whether or not they might be deliberately lying or that their logic could be highly compromised given that they, at least in her mind, absurdly reject the possibility that aliens have been coming here recently and other obvious possible phenomenon, having no good reason to doubt their possibility at least. Linda, concerning mainstream scientists, whom she doesn’t seem to realize are mainly atheists and Catholics, whom she seems to think are absurd, makes the mistake of “Appeal to Authority”, or rather says such and such is fact because these scholars say it is so, and yet, without any logical explanation, rejects their testimony or claims when they say why it is absurd that aliens would be here or have been or that these flying metallic discs people often see and other such things are just people misidentifying birds, planes, clouds, stars, the moon, clouds, or lens/camera effects or that they are lying or hallucinating. How does she reason they are trustworthy on one subject, completely trustworthy, but despite their clear bias or fear of saying the truth on the other, reason they can’t be trusted and that their reasoning on that should be totally rejected or given little consideration? CLEARLY, Linda’s reasoning is highly flawed and herself not trustworthy overall. She can repeat what people say, and put her own emotional tone into it, but that doesn’t make it true, or false, and her reasoning is clearly not to be trusted. And she does not even offer much of what could be called “reasoning” anywhere anyways. She’s like a storyteller telling stories to children, trying to entertain them.

Even more nonsensical about the way Linda reasons, is that she had at one point on Coast, spoken of the Bible as historical, if I remember right, she was referring to Ezekiel (a book famous for it’s verses about what many wrongly say refer to UFOs and aliens from outerspace). If the Bible is historical, why then in general does she not refer to it for anything else, like moral truths, historical facts other than that UFOs arrived and aliens showed themselves? And no doubt she believes that in Exodus those great miraculous events were caused by aliens, and so why then would she ignore the ten commandments? Linda is the type who, due to what I believe is demonic delusion, as in demons interfering with her ability to reason and feel rationally seeks out the “exciting” in her mind, the type who only wants to dwell on what is “amazing”, the visual things or things others saw that were dark and ominous or a light show or that made ominous or amazing sounds (she likes to talk about unexplained sounds for those who don’t know). But when it comes to morality, to law, to justice and mercy, she thinks of them as boring and bland and of little importance. She illogically disconnects the miracles, the visual and auditory shows God (or whoever) creates from the rest of the story, the rest of the testimony of those who said they saw them. To her, the glowing angel is the object of worship or the things it does, not God.

In all Linda’s news reports there is also a glaring absence of supernatural phenomenon, specifically of demon possessions, hauntings, and even cryptozoology reports. Why does she focus on one and not the others? Some may say, “It’s just her personality and area of expertise, she chooses to specialize in such and such.” However Linda clearly, from her website, has plenty of time to report on these other subjects and she must know how limited what she can do into finding out more about some sighting of a glowing object will be or some anonymous claim of aliens. What else is she doing all day that she doesn’t look into some ancient demon possession in the Catholic cult/sect/Church or modern one, publicizing what these supposed demons said, or doesn’t publicize prophecies and on and on? Is it because she is strongly repelled by religion, that her soul abhors coming close to the subject of goodness, morality, right from wrong, ultimate TRUTH, God? It is true what God said, and he said it FIVE times, it concerns mankind’s total lack of goodness:

“The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good. The Lord looks down from heaven on the children of man, to see if there are any who understand, who seek after God. They have all turned aside; together they have become corrupt; there is none who does good, not even one. Have they no knowledge…” – Psalm 14:1 and 3, and Psalm 53:1 and 3 and Romans 3:9-11

I also thought of this verse here that I put in bold, when thinking of Linda, coming to the end of finishing this article:

“They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth. Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so also these teachers oppose the truth. They are men of depraved minds, who, as far as the faith is concerned, are rejected.” – 2 Timothy 3:6-8

“Science says”? No, a blind, illogical, delusional, arrogant, moron says, “science says”

August 23, 2014 2 comments

A typical anti-religion moron I’m guessing posted an article I didn’t even bother reading because of it’s clearly stupid titles, which summed up was, “Science proves bigfoot doesn’t exist”. Specifically the titles were, “Bigfoot Is Not Real, Says Science” and “Science Delivers a Big Blow to Bigfoot”. Apparently James decided that another scientist, a genetic scientist who analyzed DNA samples claimed to be from various bigfoot creatures who with many speeches explained why the DNA likely was what it was claimed to be doesn’t count, cuz James Temple who made those titles or went with them SAID SO, not science. No delusional idiot, science doesn’t say whatever you in your arrogant delusional reality-hating mind whatever you feel it does, it doesn’t agree with your feelings and personal opinions and happen to agree with all your anti-Bible and anti-reason and anti-logic babble. Learn what logical fallacies are and stop being an extreme idiot already James Temple. “Science” also said living fossils shouldn’t exist, yet they do you fact-ignoring ape.Could anyone make a dumber claim, how about “Science proves religion doesn’t work”? “Science” says, so say atheists and anti-Bible morons, that the Bible is wrong, and yet those claims are repeatedly proven wrong. Science supposedly said the Shroud of Turin was a fake, and yet science also said afterwards that that claim was unscientific. Science according to many atheists and cultists has made God and the Bible obsolete. How so? A better shovel doesn’t make God obsolete, and a better computer won’t defeat God’s will, how could they? Could science rather have proved God repeatedly, and many assume it’s not so and so don’t bother to look into such research? Science has been repeatedly used successfully to show that God does exist by putting his word to the test. And if God does exist, what matters most is what his will is, because if you anger him, and it’s true his will is send most people to Hell who do disobey him, I hope you wouldn’t want to end up being one of those he decides to get rid of.

God’s will, what is it? Could it, might it, be in that most popular book for hundreds of years now, that lengthy often taught, most influential book, which even the Quran took from, clearly, that most translated book, that most free and sold book called “The Bible”, “The Scriptures”,, “Scripture”, “The scroll”, “God’s word’? If God asks why you ignored this book with it’s clearly good ’10 commandments’ and it’s two greatest laws, the second being Love your neighbor as yourself, and which Jesus said could all be summarized as As you would have done to you so do to others, which even atheists pretentiously claim is a golden rule, even theirs, and in their evil arrogance and deliberate ignorance often fail to credit to Christ (because they refuse to know God’s word and true history, and rather would have a history in their own image), how will anyone on a Day of Judgment be able to say to God, “I had no clue, not even one, that this ‘Bible’ was a rational or good book in anyway, not even good for historical reference, and might have even contained a lead to what your actual personality, will and laws were?” Though a corrupt Bible would be an unreliable one, one not sure for knowing God’s will, a Bible that only had minor corruptions due to inaccurate translating and copying could not be said to be unreliable anymore than any other book with minor translations and copying wrong. And if it is God’s word, who but the stupid, those who don’t care about truth despite any of their claims to the opposite, the impatient and the greedy would say, “Because these parts are in doubt, throw it all out,’ and “throw the baby out with the bathwater”? Those with a childish temperment and a morality- and logic-hating mind would say so. The ancient sage Jon Calvin aka John Calvin correctly taught God’s word and the truth of the spiritual state of mankind. Many Christians, including those who deny Christ like the giant Catholic cult, something the Bible predicts would be done in the last days by so called Christians, falsely claim that salvation is something you earn and that can be lost, using nonsensical and careless reasoning, merely repeating what was repeated to them and being to lazy and angry at God, too impatient and too prideful to understand why what that claim is wrong. They won’t even make a sincere prayer to God to know the truth about what they are really like in his eyes and how salvation from Hell works, they lack a fear of Hell, of God’s wrath and imagination of how bad an eternity of suffering would be to motivate them to know how to save themselves from such a possibility. If no one prays to God for the salvation of such care-free people, if no one teaches them the truth, people who care about everything else but pleasing God and truly loving him and not just thinking they love him, not caring if that claim to love him is a delusion, will God be motivated to save them? Will he be motivated to act to rescue them soon? Even if he does, if no one prays for such, their salvation would be late in life most likely and their good deeds therefore most likely few, and therefore any eternal rewards too they could earn fewer than those who lived a long life under God’s eternal salvation, eternal forgiveness, eternal love. And God, unlike what the majority teach, the world that is, including the Christian cults of the world, not the true Christian “church”, not the true saints, DOES NOT LOVE EVERYONE, why else would the Bible repeatedly say God’s WRATH, which means “intense anger” is “ON’ the world? Why else would Hell be ETERNAL and not a temporary punishment leading to the benefit of the world he supposedly loves according to the many deluded? Scripture is clear on how God feels about all whom he has not yet forgiven, and the world it says that is headed for eternal punishment by “torturers”: “You hate all who do wrong.” – Psalm 5:5, and that he is angry with the wicked every day. One cult ignored and ignores this, and in the passage with the bow, ignoring that bow sentence focuses on instead the verse more clear above it, God being angry every day with the wicked, and twists it to mean something that doesn’t mean that at all, they are obvious liars and do not love God, if they did, they would teach the truth about what angers God: disobedience, more specifically, those who disobey him with everything they do by failing to obey him out of love, rather than by chance or who obey to a shallow degree, but always without love, simply to avoid the feeling of guilt, a loss of a job and therefore income, and a concern for how everyone else but God would think of them, and to avoid a greater punishment in Hell. The one God loves love him back, the greater amount of sins Christ covered by his life-sacrifice the greater their love and desire to please him they will have. The ones whom Christ did not cover, did not suffer or die for but left to suffer it out eternally themselves, they won’t, unfortunately, ever love God, they may have some love for a false version of God, a spiritual idol that cannot save and in any way defeat the true living God. Those with a false image of God think it loves them or even hates them or is angry over something they did wrong, something that isn’t even wrong according to the Bible and even a good thing like judging others to be not good when they all their lives do what is not good and never show love for God (how is it obvious such people are NOT good?), but they will not have love for the true God and never will unless he loves them first. When God changes the heart of a person to love him and shun disobeying him, it is because he also desires to and will forgive them forever and make them a permanent son or daughter that WILL “stand before him”, unlike the wicked, the evil ones whom God the scriptures say “cannot stand before God” in his presence. Nor will they ever see his face. They will see many other things perhaps, especially his wrath and the angry face of his son, and the look of love on his face for those he of his own free will chose to save, but not the face of God, no more than love for them. God in his goodness desires that everyone love him, that everyone love to do right and does right, but it is not his will, the desire of his mind; in his wisdom he has chosen that the majority of people born in this dark age from Adam’s sin to before Christ returns to rule while those who hate him still exist (which will be the “1000 year reign of Christ” before all the unsaved are permanently done away with in Hell and sin prevented in anyone born since that time), he has chosen that many do sin and do so forever, even in Hell to serve as an eternal example of what a failure to love God and his not loving them results in. It is an example that God will eternally use to, successfully, not just by his love and his acts of love, to persuade those who have a good spirit from desiring to do wrong, in other words to sin, to disobey his laws, laws which are a part of his written will for how we should live. Live to do good and good will happen to you forever, live to do evil and you will be eternally blocked from this universe and shut out from God’s love.

What words can cats understand that we say?

June 15, 2014 1 comment

Cat’s can learn about 50 words supposedly. Here are some phrases I think my oldest cats know in no specific order:

1. “yes” or “hawww?”

2. “no”

3. “no good”

4. “good”

5. “bad”

6. “yucky” i say this when Sushi, as he loves to do, rolls around in the dirt and dust and plant debris, he knows I hate that since I brush it off him sometimes and prevent him from doing it right when he’s about to.

7. “Food, foodie foodie food, fooooooood” :) or I’ll ask them “want food?” or express bewilderment at them not wanting food with, “no food?”

8. “water”

9. “egg”

10. “chicken”

11. “beef”

12. “fish” I don’t say that often since they seem to prefer beef most of all, then chicken and raw egg, and seem to prefer fish stuff last. But since cats supposedly have good memories, I suppose they may know that word. I do remember Sasha was highly interested in smelling raw unfrozen fish, and seemed like she wanted to eat it, but since it was whole fish I’m guessing she preferred it be cut up.

13. “crunchies” (hard food)

14. “water”

15. “(cat’s name) go pee pee, poo poo? Good poo poo/pee pee” (I still say it since it’s a habbit since they were kittens to encourage them to use the litterbox and so their feral kitten relatives will hear me praise them. The kittens are all litter box users. Torrie has bizarre behavior, will “errrrrrrr” in an upset tone if I bring her in front of the feeding dish, even when no other kittens or cats are there. So annoying since I must bring the food to her to her chosen spot at the house, her little living area. I hate that… I did notice her, once, using the litter box, but other than that she poops in fear when I pick her up as she knows it angers me when she makes that errrr sound and hisses. I don’t understand why she is so stubborn and won’t stop (I say pee pee and poo poo so much with these new kittens I feel as if I’m going insane). No doubt Torrie still needs to hear me say for another week:

16. “no hiss” (don’t hiss)

17. “no errrrr” (don’t grrrr)

18. “hiss bad”

19. “wanna go outside?” /”outside?” Sushi, my male cat, about a year and half old will come up to me and try and warm me up and make some cute sounds or place his paw on my leg to get me to let him out. One time I looked down and saw him observing his arm, trying to turn it so that it would be on my leg sideways, as if he were a human trying to figure out how to make a human kind of gesture. He looked like he was thinking, “Am I moving my arm right?” It was cute.

20. “look, hair” I say this when I groom them or hair catches on my fingers and let them see it, or they look to see what has come off of them.

21. “so much hair”. I wonder if they understand what I mean by “much”. I wonder because I never say, “not much” or “no much”.

22. “bye/I’m going”

23. “bird” I rarely say that word.

24. “lizard” rare

25. “hot/too hot” rare

26. “cold” very rare

27. “dirty” I say that along with “yucky” sometimes

28. sometimes I sigh while or after cleaning, and I can tell Sasha knows I’m not enjoying myself and overwhelmed from the look on her face

29. “sorry”

30. “play with (cat’s/kitten’s name here)”

31. “get it” as in “get the wriggling leaf blade/lizard/bird/ball/rope”

32. “head”

33. “foot”

I taught them, or rather tried to, get them to learn other body part words, but since I could tell it would be very time consuming and have little obvious benefit other than maybe boosting their intelligence a little, and being exhausted and in pain a lot, stopped.

34. “what’s wrong?”

35. purring sound

36. “(cat’s name) happy/?”

37. “(cat’s name) sad/?”

38. “watcha doin?”

39. “no scratch/scratch scratch (I say the latter when I see them scratching something, just to give them some brain boosting exercise and entertainment”

40. “no run”/”why you run?”

41.”(Sushi) so fast, (Sushi) run fast” Sushi loves to play chase and run and play big shot by arching his back and tip-toeing to imaginary foes, it’s adorable

42. “(no) hide/why you hide?”

43. “fire”

44. “Light”

45. “where’s my…”

46. “no bite/you bite me/why you bite me?”

47. “lick (cat’s/kitten’s name). of course it never works. Sasha and Sushi will only lick each other mostly, and stopped doing it many months ago, sadly. Sasha will only lick the kittens she knows now with one lick or an attempted lick.

48. “jump/good jump”

49. “climb tree”

50. “wanna go on the roof?/roof” I haven’t said this for months since my cats completely lost interest in going on the roof, I’m guessing because it was obviously boring up there and they already knew how much more interesting it was to wander freely outside and they made that painfully, excruciatingly, exhaustingly obvious.

51. “bzzz bzzz” they know this means “fly”, or a red laser dot is somewhere around or about to appear

52. “come here” (and other such phrases and words I won’t mention since they are obvious, but I’ve rarely used them

53. “sleep” something Sushi would know a little I think since almost every time during the day or night he comes to rest or sleep on my bed. I say that too him when he is wrestles and wanting to go outside, or seem unsure if he wants to.

54. of course, “i love you”

Though not words, cats can read various facial expressions, and they make it clear, especially Sasha, that they know what I’m feeling, in a way you could count these as words, though not literal words, but it would obviously take up learning/memory space. There’s also variations of their name’s I use, and I wonder if that takes up much memory language space in their brain. So, that’s about 50 words and phrases together my cats know or should be able to. It’s somewhat satisfying that they know all these things, but obviously it’s barely like talking to a human, and there’s no conversations going on. The sad thing for all pet owners with dogs, cats and parrots is the lack of the pet’s ability to answer back in our language some question, like “what’s wrong?”, except for a parrot perhaps, which might reply, “no fish” if it wanted some but was only given seeds to eat.

What unique words or phrases have you taught your cats, pets or parrots that you think they clearly understand (don’t mention anything vulgar please).

Obama the Two Face’s Obscure Reasoning

Obama is a two face, he quoted the Sermon on the Mount (a famous passage in the Bible, which though is famous is not actually memorized by most people) to mock Christians when he said, “Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy?” (then quotes Leviticus and Deuteronomy out of context and lies about a verse saying the Bible says to stone “your child” implying “kid” rather than adult, and lying twice about it,

    since it depends on whether or on the parents decide to bring their ADULT SON to trial!

)… or should we just take the Sermon on the Mount, which is so radical the Defense Department wouldn’t survive its application.” Meanwhile, Two Face implies the “HOLY QURAN” as he calls it, IS a good guide for the Department of Defense, implying the military in general. Really? So plundering and murdering other Arabs and in his racism, Jews, for not obeying his narcissist maniac self, that is, Mohammed, the Mohammed who offered no evidence for HIS WORD (there was no Quran during Mohammed’s time) being true in any way, is a good guide for the militaries of the world to go by!? The same Mohammed who’s family thought he was being manipulated by demons? What a terrorist Two Face is then!

So though Two Gace made that lie, Two Face also used the same Sermon on the Mount passage to justify gay marriage: “If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount, which I think is, in my mind, for my faith.” So the very BIBLE, and very passage Obama mocked in 2006, is now central to his faith in 2008. And big surprise he doesn’t explain why, rather, his reasoning remains OBSCURE, and actually not even known because he doesn’t give any specifics, but is vague. Obama says, “Oh you white teabagger Christian colonialists, it justifies gay marriage but I’ll keep my conniving remarks obscure, now I never said I was referring to ‘Do unto others’ in the Defense or Gay Marraige comment so you can’t say I was contradicting myself”, oh really Mr. Contraditions, then what did you mean? And why did he say the passage in Romans is obscure? What is the evidence? None. And what is his evidence that obscurity matters with regards to obedience to God or its relevancy? Why does it matter how many people know some verse? It’s obviously not obscure being that it always comes up in “is homosexuality right or wrong” debates. So whatever Obama says without explanation is true simply is, in his crazy mind. If part of God’s word is obscure, it’s safe to ignore it and pretend it says nothing, great reasoning. If you want to use the Bible as a pandering tool, don’t quote specific verses, just make vague references, great conartist opportunist social-climber reasoning. Only directly quote Scripture to attack it, so for example, don’t mention that part of the S.O. Mount that says, “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.” … keep radical verses like obscure, because it may cause people to realize what you really are.

Obscurity Is Obama’s Middle Name, just like his birth certificate, just like his school records, just like the fact he worked for a CIA front, just like his Connecticut social security number. And oh how bad the Sermon on the Mount is for saying to DO TO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO TO YOU, how that would crush the Defense Department to not go about crushing “enemies” for oil and war profiteering, oh how that would MAKE THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT POOR and OBSCURE, oh how Obama would have less buddies in the high military to hobnob with, less rich friends to invite him to dinner, whispering about their latest weaponry and anti-Taliban tactics. Oh how great that non-radical Quran is that Obama endorses, how it doesn’t say in any way to lie for the faith or to terrorize or extort, nope. It’s such a good book that Obama tells NASA to make the Muslim feel good, and made Russia the go to country to get satellites in space, Russia, an enemy now, cuz Putin slighted Obama over Syria, another Big Brother military industrial complex war profiteering scheme. Obama isn’t a Muslim, and he’s not a Christian, his narcissistic lying implies, that like Hitler, is a two faced atheist liar. He should be hung, not for being black, but for being a repeat human rights violator. How many more drone bombings on KIDS, yep, REAL KIDS Obomber, need to happen, before Obama is called to the International Crimes Court to explain himself?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 56 other followers