The Insanity of Doubt: The Code of Hammurabi, Ten Commandments, and Skepticemia

To be updated.

(Old post:)

While researching ancient law I came upon a pseudo-history page on a website on the Code of Hammurabi and Ten Commandments, made by, no surprise to me, an atheist. Here are quotes from that page in the order I found them in with my replies to the sections I divided them into:

“Around 1750 B.C.E. the Code of Hammurabi, one of the oldest known legal codes, was cast in stone in Mesopotamia. This remarkable stone exists today in the Louvre museum in Paris.The code has elements of contract law, various human rights, and was considered so fundamental that they even applied to the king. The code included prohibitions against lying, theft, and murder, which are so universal that there are few cultures without them.”

Why don’t you tell everyone what the punishments were in his code? Why are you such a truth-hiding hypocrite you self-righteous bigot? Why don’t you quote these allegedly ripped off laws? What’s wrong, too harsh and merciless for you, too arbitrary?

“Roughly a thousand years later, Yahweh, the tribal god of the Israelites,”

What is your evidence he was merely a tribal God when he judged and punished the world, when he judged and punished the Egyptians and Babylon? Why are you so ignorant of the history you pretend to know? He is the God of 100+ million Calvinistic Christians and even more Catholics. Hardly a tribal God, big duh.

“is claimed in Biblical lore to have created a list of commands on stone tablets for Moses”

It’s not a mere claim it is evidence from archaeological findings which you clearly don’t want to study or hear about because you are a self-obsessed opinion-basher. Now what is the evidence for your claims besides your petty emotional banter?

“to give to his people. Perhaps the writers of the Torah coveted the power of the Babylonian stone tablets and created a story about stone tablets of their own in response.”

“Perhaps”? Your evidence is your ignorant speculation yet you call Yahweh a hypocrite? What a massive slanderous hypocrite you are. Talk about stupidity, talk about hypocrisy, talk about a time-waster. So call Christians and Yahweh hypocrites based on your “perhaps”? Get a life you deluded hypocrite.

“Upon returning to his people, Moses found his followers worshiping a golden calf and in a dramatic huff he smashed the tablets and they were never mentioned again.”

So the Bible must be repetitive on every single event? Don’t fault-finding hypocrites whine about the Bible being boring because it always repeats? Damn God if he does damn him if he doesn’t, right arbitrary babbler, right opinion-parrot?

“(Yahweh clearly didn’t foresee the event”

“Clear” because he said so, and whatever the opinion-basher says is true is true, cuz he said so.

“nor did he use a more suitable material for the tablets, such as diamond coated titanium.)”

And it’s more suitable cuz? Cuz the confused babbling opinion-parrot said so. Ye said it so I believe it. Aliens like to eat bananas while spinning on inverted toilets because the color blue smells good. Hey, makes as much sense as what you said.

“After 3000 people were immediately killed and a plague sent for their transgression, Yahweh dictated a second set of commandments”

No blind babbler, they are based on the ten. Get a clue and study rather than babbling. Please learn what logic and evidence and stop babbling nonsense so that there is less useless time-wasting clutter on the net to distract people from learning the truth. Oh, my bad, your lies are useful for one thing, pointing out the stupidity and hypocrisy of non-Christians.

“to Moses that were clearly meant to replace the first set”

Cuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true cuz ye said it. If it was meant to replace the first set, why is the first set still in the Bible, and repeated twice, AFTER the golden-calf creation, which for no logical clear reason you imply is why a second set is created? Moreover wannabe scholar, did you notice the first set says not to make idols? So how is the second set a replacement lol? Blind to what is obvious and clear much?

“and the only ones called his commandments by Yahweh.”

Wrong again, they are called “the ten words” (Exodus 34:28) more than once, implying they are the main commandments. Furthermore, Yeshuah, who is Yahweh, said, “You know the commandments: ‘Do not commit adultery, Do not murder, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother.'” – Luke 18:20. Now how is it you don’t know these commandments let alone that they are commandments? So someone needs to say, “This is a command”, or you can’t recognize what it obviously is? Do you need every little thing pointed out for you fault-finder, to understand what it is that is right in front of your hateful face? How did the utter obvious slip right past you in your “research”? Because you’re too busy being an attention-seeker.

“The second, undamaged set was placed in the mythical Ark of the Covenant.”

Mythical cuz ye said so, and whatever ye say is true cuz ye said so.

“Strangely, the contents of the second set are largely ignored today.”

Cuz ye said so, and whatever the wannabe scholar says is true is true, cuz he said it. Now, largely ignored by who hypocrite? Hypocrites like you of course who make up imaginary ‘facts’ backed by emotionalism and not evidence.

“You might be surprised to learn that the real tenth commandment is a prohibition on a method of cooking kid goats.”

Cuz ye said so, and whatever ye said is true cuz ye said it.

“There are many more problems with the Exodus story and the reader is encouraged to explore skeptical criticisms of it.”

Wow, I thought you were giving factual criticisms lol. Not. Instead, big surprise, you tell us it’s biased (skeptical) criticisms. Do you know what a pseudoskeptic is? Hint: Or how about skepticemia? Here’s more careful legwork for you:

Chapter Entry

After you get the mental and spiritual help you need to cure you of your compulsive hatred.

Did Moses Steal the Ten Commandments?

Big Business Vs. The Little Guys: The Truth About Copyrights and Patents

My studies have shown me that copyrights and patents or rather copyright and patent enforcement are destructive to the world in general. They temporarily benefit a small few while oppressing most everyone else.

1. Copyrights and patents prevent technological progression from happening fast and even happening at all. It can even drive people to revert to using older and inferior technology if someone decides to be mean or greedy and enforce their copyright and patent ‘rights’.

2. It is easily used as a tool by elites to land people in prison merely because they personally don’t like that person or because that person is against their philosophical beliefs not even related to copyright or patent philosophy directly.

3. It keeps many people jobless or working poor jobs. For example a person who could be mass producing some valuable and life-saving medication may instead use his money to build himself a new home and buy a car, and then end up working at McDonald’s or even homeless should his home burn down. But if he had lived in some cheap apartment, spent his money on a drug business making some cancer drug, he could employ many workers, be a ceo and expand his business. You may think, “Well without copyright and patent people would just face competition from others for the same stuff so it would cancel out the benefits” however that would forget the competition factor. In the face of such competition with such a large population as America’s, with decent business laws not including copyright and patent laws, someone wins out and often has a superior and more affordable product. They may at first be making an already available generic cancer drug, but during the competition produce something better in order to stay in business. The huge pharmaceuticals in power now deliberately delay producing more effective drugs because they like to play it safe and conserve their money while making as much profit as possible. That is not good for anyone but the shareholders and even the shareholders are suffering in a sense since they could possibly be making much more money if they would improve their products or sell completely new and better ones.

4. Copyright and patent enforcement wastes money and time. Tax payers end up paying for lengthy trials which end up profiting not necessarily the patent and copyright owners, but the person with the most money who is suing or being sued.

5. It’s impossible to enforce. Some argue that if people are stealing hard goods all the time should we just let them do it? Jesus would say to just let yourself be stolen from (although allows for the possibility of complaining to the authorities) but to compare stealing hard goods to information is a poor comparison. The reason is because information is ‘stolen’ infinitely more than hard goods. The number of copyrighted things being downloaded and copied is way way more then the theft of hard goods stolen each day, unless you want to include kids taking their parents’ food and pocket change without permission, but I doubt that even comes close to the amount of copyrighted things being copied each HALF-HOUR let alone day. I know this from personal research. So, should the entire world (minus poor countries to poor to download no thanks to greedy and lazy big businesses) be arrested so that the rich can get richer and the poor more poor to the point of them being murderous rebels?

I believe that musicians and artists and inventors can, without copyright and patent laws, make a good living. They have the possibility of getting donations, or playing their music live, doing artistry before their viewers, continuing to paint (rather then being lazy and trying simply to live off royalties), and inventors, rather than hoping for or relying on royalties, would instead be offered a huge one lump some of cash or steady payments over time regardless of the sales of their invention or not. To me, trying to live off royalties is like someone claiming they own some new dance move, and that anyone making money off it owes them money. Or imagine a teacher telling his students they will owe him or his children money for the rest of their lives if they profit off what they’ve learned from him, it’s absurd, complicated to the point of impossibility, and everyone would end up being poor in the end, or their would be a profit of zero from everyone passing on money repeatedly to give everyone their never-ending royalties.

Related info:

James Randi Minions Can’t Take Sarcasm, From Christians

Poor James Randi moderator, couldn’t stand a christian joking about skepticemia, amazingly, it’s okay to talk about big foot, the invisible kind, and all kinds of other absurd “look at me everyone I doubt it!” stories, as long as you don’t point out how absurd it is.

“Your account has either been suspended or banned.

If you have any questions regarding this you can use the “Contact Us” link at the bottom of this page to contact the administrators.”


High Weirdeness As Evidence for God

I was watching Fraggle Rock cartoons yesterday, then while looking up info on a invention salesmen named Dennis Lee just now found a Wikipedia article on “Dennis Lee” ” but it turns out to be another Dennis Lee who wrote the lyrics to the Fraggle Rock intro theme.

I found a news article recently showing that Global Warming scare mongers ripped off over $2 billion from poor countries while simultaneously making the whole world worse according to certain of their like-minded scientists. On top of that, these scientists had been warning them that they would make things worse or were for years. That just goes to show how sick these global warmers are.

Greenpeace Whines Again When EU Comes To It’s Senses

“European Parliament fails planet, panders to profits, Tough regulations on planet-imperilling chemicals rejected” whined the hypocrite Greenpeace moneybaggers. Greenpeace is a virtual corporation and has decided to spin a planet-saving action into doin’ the planet bad:

Hypocritical Whining

Apparently the EU saw this video and decided to stop pandering to Greenpeace money baggers and similar lying thieves:

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Video Size: 640 x 368)

Or maybe they read these great books:

The Satanic Gases: Clearing the Air about Global Warming

Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming

The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World

Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming

Or maybe they felt too ashamed and guilty to continue being hypocritical, planet-destroying, terrorist thieves with greenpeace, earth-first and the sierra club:

CFC Substitutes Fix Ozone Hole, But Speed Up Global Warming. The title of that article from Fox News is a lie by the way. Notice the article says nothing about the hole magically being sealed let alone any evidence for that which would be quite amazing if true. Even when the global scare mongering thieves manage to tell some truth, they can’t help but add some lies.

2nd Blog On Carl Flygare, a Super Anti-Christian Bigot

Note that the moderators of are severe hypocrites. They have deleted my reviews for being “dissertations” and always reviews which are on anti-Christian books. Yet why then do these hypocrites allow Carl’s dissertations which are much longer then the longest reviews they’ve deleted? Here is another example of Carl’s ranting stupidity masquerading as a scientific review:

Carl Flygare – The wannbe scientist and bigot who amazon moderators sanction

January 3, 2008
A Kid’s Review (lol, Carl is a kid? Something tells me not, emotionally it’s no doubt true though. Look up the definition of kid instead of taking Carl’s word for it).

Since Car refuses to give a true review, and the amazon hypocrite moderators approve of that, shouldn’t I, a Christian, also be allowed to post a non-review in like manner? At least mine are true. Now, let’s analyze what the bigot ignorant Prententious Carl the Mentally Ill Mad Raving Wannabe Scientist and Contentious Genie said:

Apologetics Cross-Dressed As Science Redux, or Whack-a-Mole 2.0, November 30, 2007

By Carl Flygare

“Did you know that Master Books, the publisher of “The Young Earth: The Real History of the Earth – Past, Present, and Future” by John Morris, President of The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is the publishing arm of the ICR – an ethical, functional, intellectual and in this case incestuous oxymoron – staffed by a bizarre bestiary of barking-mad biblical literalists; a priori dedicated to the preposterous presupposition that any myth or fable in the Bible – however hermeneutically contrived or at odds with objective reality – must trump the findings of modern science?”

Yawn. When will Carl stop wasting time being pretentious, pretending that his ranting mockery is evidence. When will this demon-loving hypocrite get down to real science?

“The Master Books mission statement commits to “Publishing creation-based materials for all ages that defend the Bible from the very first verse.” No reputable mainstream publisher would ever consider or release such a farcical farrago of fervent faith-based fantasy – Morris essentially self-published his own book, the iconic imprimatur of a crank.”

When will this hypocrite review the book and stop pretending to be putting forth evidence of wrong doing? We’re waiting.

“This “Revised and Expanded” edition, burdened by an equally puerile fact and content-free PowerPoint presentation on CD (for witnessing to the witless perhaps), regurgitates the same creationist canards, denialism, and fallacies – in the service of the supposedly divine – that defaced and laced the original printing of “The Young Earth” in 1994.”

Learn what evidence hypocrite: Hint, it doesn’t mean, “Whatever Carl the hypocrite says it means.”

“Morris falls into the “God said it, I believe it, that settles it” dogma dumpster”

Why is this hypocrite raving and slandering? Why is he taking Morris and all creationists out of context? Lying hypocrite who needs to learn what context means, we believe God because what he says is evident you moron, not because someone called God merely said it you moron. That is why the book Morris wrote and Ken Ham contains scientific evidence you moron, not simply one page with one sentence saying “God said it therefore it’s true.” Idiot liar, stop lying already. You’re not cool, you’re a lying hypocrite who thinks his opinions are evidence in and of themselves.

“but surreptitiously substitutes “I said it, God agrees with it, that settles it logic.”

Carl said it, therefore it’s true. You hypocrite, you are doing the very thing you are falsely accusing Morris and Ken and Duane for doing. You hypocrite, we present scientific evidence and logical evidence, where the hell is yours you raving hypocrite? Your logic stinks, when will you come up with actual evidence?

“He uses God like a ventriloquist uses a dummy – by putting words into his mouth – to defend otherwise indefensible arguments from authority; a desperate gambit necessary to sustain a contorted and contrived strain of anti-intellectual Christian fundamentalism with spectacularly inane pseudoscience.”

Massive hypocrite insults and mere claims are not evidence and of themselves. Because Carl said it does not make it true. When do you think Carl will stop being such a hypocrite and pretending that what he says is true merely because he said it? This is Carl the hypocrite’s logic:

“If a Christian says it it must not be true, if an anti-Christian like me Carl says it, then it must be true.” That’s you, hypocrite, not us. Carl the hypocrite then said:

“”The Young Earth” – with increasing ineptitude in every chapter – attempts to justify a 6,000 year old Earth; a harlequin hypothesis conjured into existence by Archbishop James Ussher who credulously concluded that the Earth was created on Sunday, October 23, in 4,004 BC. John Lightfoot, a contemporary of Ussher even ventured a time of day – 9:00 AM!”

Massive hypocrite, once again, mere mockery is not evidence in and of itself your opinion is not magically self justifying. Laughing is not evidence. What a hypocrite. The hypocrite then says:

“Over the past two hundred years scientific advances in a number of disciplines, ranging from cosmology to physics and geology, have allowed researchers to determine the age of the Earth with remarkable accuracy – 4.54 billion years (plus or minus 1%).”

Because you said so bigoted moron. Master hypocrite, there are also creation scientists, did you notice? Did you notice super hypocrite that not all say the Earth is billions of years old? Hyper moron how could you miss that when you’ve “reviewed” the books of some of them? Dur? Duh? Doh? Super hypocrite how does it escape your ignorant self that Copernicus, Galileo and Newton, were all creationists? How does it escape your evil self that Christians scientists are the ones who created the modern scientific method and not idiot atheists like you? Big duh. Learn history and stop bashing people merely because they disagree with your stinky breathed self. Here ignorance-lover, more legwork for you:

Five historians all agree that the Bible and Christianity led to the modern scientific methods.

So, Carl the ranting hypocrite who posted a false stinky review, will you also post false reviews against those historians and pretend to be a historian yourself? Clearly the rest of your rant is not worth reading. You are a stubborn rebellious hypocrite trying to look cool, dying for worthless temporary back pats and invitations to parties from fellow hypocrites like yourself. See how many back pats you’ll be getting in Hell.

Note to my readers, amazon moderators have deleted my reviews on various anti-christian and anti-calvinistic books for being dissertations, yet they sanction Carl’s false raving reviews which are at least twice the size of my longest reviews. Amazon’s CEO sanctions the moderators’ actions, that makes an anti-christian company who merely tolerates Christian books so as to not look totally biased and lose all their Christian customers. I suggest you buy the books through my amazon store and boost their rank to the top of amazon’s book rank and by doing so push their junk propaganda to the bottom.

Ending Abortion Would Save Social Security, Group Argues

Susan Jones
Morning Editor

( – President Bush can protect Social Security by “curing” abortion, a pro-life group says.

The American Life League is running a full-page newspaper ad in Thursday’s Washington Times, explaining that since 1973, more than 50 million babies have been killed through abortion.

“Those are the very babies that, today, would be living, working — and paying into Social Security,” said Judie Brown, president of American Life League. “However, the national plague of abortion has eliminated those contributors from society.”

Full story here:

Lying About the Bantu Pygmies – More Evolution Propaganda

Pygmies’ short life spans may be behind their small size

December 11th, 2007 – 4:17 pm ICT by admin

Washington, December 11 (ANI): A new study suggests that the smaller life spans of pygmies across the world might be a reason as to why they are smaller in size than average humans.

The research suggests that brief life spans put evolutionary pressure on pygmy women to stop growing and to start giving birth sooner.”

And it “suggests” meaning what? Who wrote this article? An evolutionist of course, so of course it’s going to suggest evolution is true. Big duh. And suggests to who lol? To creationists who don’t lie for profit and pride? Creationists who aren’t in the habit of lying? So that’s the powerful evolutionary evidence? To bullshit and be vague? And how does brief life span = stop growing? Is evolution now like karma? It’s magically intelligent? It’s some sort of god now? The article goes on to say:

“As a result of this, the energy that should normally be expended on growth gets spent on reproduction at a younger age.”

Wow, check that out, their evidence is to repeat what they just said. Thanks for wasting my time. No wait, not a total waste, they’ve demonstrated more evidence for their “repeat a lie enough and people will believe it” technique. The article then says:

““The idea is that (pygmies) have to stop growing earlier, because when you start reproducing at least for women all the energy you would put in growth is put into reproduction,” the National Geographic quoted Andrea Migliano, the lead author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow at Clare College, Cambridge, in the United Kingdom, as saying.”

For the third time the article repeats this theory without citing evidence for its validity. And besides that did you notice any errors? Notice Andrea avoided the issue of why the men would not grow taller being that they don’t have to expend much energy carrying around and feeding a baby? So much for her “idea”. Furthermore, what is the evidence that “all of the energy” a pygmy uses is put into reproduction? You mean they don’t dance, sing, learn, hunt, grow, nurse babies, or have fun doing other things? So they can’t do both huh, they can only be baby machines? Furthermore, how much energy could it possibly for a human to grow from 1 foot to 5 or 7 feet in FOURTEEN-EIGHTEEN YEARS? Since when does growing to even eight feet after eighteen years make a person unable to give birth to two or three kids and unable to be a very active person? Does anyone notice anyone living shorter and shorter lifespans from being very active lol? Would pygmies disappear if they were more active? So this is evolutionary science?

The article then says:

““You have to choose either you grow or you reproduce,” she added.”

Cuz she said so (horrible!: I can either be 1 foot or have kids), and didn’t I virtually read that stupid teaching three other times in this article without any evidence to back it? And what’s with the switcheroo? First were talking about life-span, then it shifts to height. What the hell? Can evolutionists stop going off on illogical tangents?

There is no magical evolution law that says, “Hi, if you live longer you can’t more kids!”

Ironically, in atheist-evolutionist dominated China, they even force abortions on those, including christians who try to have more then one or two children. Sick atheist-evolutionists try and force their theories to come true. Sick, vile, sick.

The Gospel In All Languages – My Gospel Translation Project

I started a project that I had forgotten about for many months, a project to translate my version of the gospel into all the major languages of the world. I barely have any money and the majority of it will take up all or almost all of my disability check for next month, leaving me with nothing. I’ll finally be forced to use food stamps again. I’ve already got one translation in Portuguese and one woman is working on a Russian translation.

Should I meet Pastor Galen of First Family Church of Albuquerque, New Mexico again, perhaps he will once again encourage me and make me feel “apart of the family” with another bitter, “You reap what you sow” come back if I tell him that I ‘m impoverished again.

My next project is to have certain other verses translated in fulfillment of a certain prophecy.

If anyone wants to donate to me to help me out, contact me.