Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Christianity’

Why Liberals and the Liberal MSM Hate and Attack Russia, Putin and President Trump

Why Liberals and the Liberal Media Demonize Russia, Putin and President Trump

First of all liberals oppose conservativism, and therefore Republicans, and Trump at least verbally sides with conservatives. Second, Putin and allegedly all of the government under him openly opposes homosexuals and pro homosexual speech. It’s actually against Russian law to endorse homosexuality. Now then logically Russia must oppose liberalism as all liberals support homosexuality, and many even support letting little children having homosexual sex, at least with others their age, and no doubt liberals would enjoy watching it, not many would admit it in public out of fear of coming across as perveted predatory sex-addicts who care more about their personal sexual gratification then children, or almost entirely, or, entirely about their satisfaction, as a psychopath would be like. Now, does anyone think political liberals, well-studied ones who enjoy pushing their beliefs, their faith, their philosphies of men on others will simply sit quietly and let Putin and his conservative anti-gay government who view (at least claim to view) gays as mentally ill or logically confused) become influential in American politics, like tolerate the possibility that some part of the Russian government tried to get a spiritually and morally similar or preferable (at least as far as they could tell) president elected, especially if the opposition candidate was liberal and barely lost by a few votes? Especially if they thought Russia helped to demonize that candidate? Of course, with the tons and tons of wealthy busy-body, gossip-hungry, strife-loving liberals in America they’d counter attack, they’d look for holes in Trump’s armor, try and take him down. Personally and as a true Christian, I oppose conservatism and liberalism as both are anti-Biblical philosophies. I oppose the conservatism of the type of the corrupt hypocrite, Freemason, deist, two-faced, man-fearing, founding fathers because they sanction liberal speech, or at least they claimed to, as do their cult followers called “Constitutionalists” and conservatives. How the humans act who claim to uphold those laws isn’t necessarily going to be in obedience.

That is why CNN.com today said Russia has a “hostile” government, a misleading lie, a deception. It’s HOSTILE TO LIBERALISM AND LIBERALS and by extension to atheists, which is ironic as Russia used to be atheist dominated. Liberals play the same word game propaganda endorsing liberalism in sneaky ways by demonizing creationists and Bible-obeying Christians by promoting so called “mainstream science” meaning pro-atheist science, a scientific philosophy not based on science that denies Biblical creationism and the need to worship SOLEY the God of the Bible or alternatively, any “God” or god at all. The Bible strongly warns against Christians allowing godlessness in the church, but to instead make sure their children are at least theistic. That’s really what this is about: liberals opposing traditional anti-homosexual, monotheistic Christianity. So then one must wonder why then do liberals support Islam, which is also monotheistic (in a wrong way) and anri-homosexual? Because, the smarter liberals think or did think they could turn these “stupid” Muslims to their side by welcoming them, perhaps also because some liberals found out many Muslims were pro homosexual child-sex lovers and engaged in it but also for a more malicious reason, that being that many Muslims are militant and willing to blow up their enemies (Christians, some liberals think, are their main enemies) and therefore could help kill the “worst” Christians like Pat Robertson and others. Tbe problem: Some militant Muslims must believe if they truly know the Quran and believe it, that “Christians are the closest (you Muslims) have to friends”, which is basically a verse in the Quran. It’s not talking about liberal Christians, but Catholics (that’s all Mohammed knew of in his experience, not Calvinists or Lutherans). So, of course, some Muslims would first attack liberals, like ones in a gay club, not Christian churches first. Think: would a Muslim want to attack first fellow worshipers of God with the good ten commandments, or atheists and “the immoral”, the “lawless” liberals who despise traditional Christian and the similar Islamic morals? But liberals being severely chaotic inside and blind often reject the obvious and do what is stupid, childish and against common sense, severely, so they end up being blown up by the dogs and swine they want to partner with or befriend. Befriending scorpions and venomous snakes is not wise. So, elite liberals in politics who enjoy manipulating and attacking anti-liberals are trying to turn two conservative governments (the US partially conservative) from joining forces and even becoming a single government in the future perhaps which may crush liberals. That, is what this is about. It’s not about liberals wanting justice or fairness or caring about treason or if Obama was really a citizen of the USA or not, but their feelings and philosophy, their point of view not being trashed, and ultimately, their hatred of God.

Now, someone may ask me, “whose side are you on if you are against attacking LGBTQs and persecuting them by saying, ‘Libs hate God'”?

1. Am I not allowed my own opinion whether political, religious or philosophical? May I even dare to believe I have factual reality-based beliefs or must I only side exactly with you or some group which often cannot even entirely agree amongst themselves. For example how many LGBTQs agree on calling people “queer” or gender neutral people? Many insist that’s a biologal impossibility and unscientific.

2. I specifically referred to elite liberals, that does not even mean LGBTQs. The “1%”ers are a very specific group.

3. Did I say I support Russia or Trump?

4. Did I say which version of God LGBTQs hate?

Make no assumptions about me, just as you’d like me not to do to you.

 

Hypocrite and False Scholar Jan Irvin Blinded By Shrooms

December 29, 2011 5 comments

Post link: http://shrooms.tk

On Coast to Coast Am is an annoyingly nasal and fake historical expert on Christianity named Jan Irvin (pronounced “Yan”). This person claims that behind Judaism and Christianity is nothing more than mushrooms, forget history, forget the accomplishments of Christians and Jews, thousands of years of work, whether or not they accomplished anything of value, forget about anything specific the Bible says, forget about if any of it makes sense or is useful for anything, like telling people not to lie, murder or be angry at each other in hypocrisy or judge one another in hypocrisy, just say, “It was the mushrooms, because it mentions the color red sometimes.” He claims that there’s very little evidence that Jesus was a historical person, as in a real person, and more evidence that he was a myth. Using that logic, his claim that mushrooms are behind Judaism and Christianity is also a myth, a lie, made up, because there is only very little tenuous highly subjective evidence that mushrooms are behind these religions. An example of one of his evidences is that Santa Claus is red, and that red presents are left under a Christmas tree, and no doubt I’d guess that Rudolph’s nose is red. Jan Irvin, you are an idiot. First, since when do Mushrooms grow in the winter!!!!!!? So much your for your expertise on mushrooms! Second, RED?! How about THE BLOOD OF CHRIST?! HELLO: “CHRIST-MAS”!? Or how about HOLLY BERRIES? ROUND HOLLY BERRIES! Guess where Holly berries come from genius? THE HOLLY TREE. I imagine if he saw white spots on a red-wrapped BOX under a Christmas tree he’d think “SHROOMS!”. No: squares aren’t shrooms, and white dots can be explained away as SNOW, and red as HOLLY BERRIES. He is truly stupid and arbitrary. That would mean that he’s also stereotyping and lumping, meaning calling all Catholics Christians and all Christians Catholics, showing that he is ignorant of the distinction between the different types of Christians. It’s a hypocritical oversight too since atheists arbitrarily trump up the differences while at the same time saying that all (fundamentalist) Christians are the same. He also brought up a supposedly hidden ancient comment that Jesus was born on the same day as other deities and therefore Christ was just a myth. Besides that making no more sense then saying, “People ate apples that day therefore apples are mythical,” this Jan obviously is nothing more than a shallow researcher, because if he looked up that argument he would have found this: http://web.archive.org/web/20111104005406/http://kingdavid8.com/Letters/LetterThousand.html

This Jan was also questioned on Coast by a guest caller asking him what he thought about the Shroud of Turin, and he said that the arguments made for it are “arbitrary” and “salacious”. LOL. A guy who argues that the color red, and shapes and a spurious single comment disproves Christianity talks about arbitrary and salacious? He also claimed that many shrouds appeared in Europe and that it’s been well debunked. HUH? Since when? He also claimed with a very annoyed tone that it’s merely “arguing the arbitrary” when people bring up “all these little questions” (DAMN THOSE PESKY LITTLE QUESTION ASKERS!) and that the “onus is on them” to prove these things, and that he can’t prove a negative (wrong) and yet said they need to “study logic”. Wow, what a hypocritical evidence-hater. A caller merely asked his opinion on it and he gets angry a few minutes later. And studying logic? He didn’t even know that it’s a fallacy that you can’t disprove a negative, and yet he himself ARBITRARILY thew up false arguments against the Shroud. What a hypocrite. When another caller brought up Josephus, he claimed that some flow of Josephus’ writing was, uh, unflowed? where Jesus is mentioned, and that if you remove it (oh wouldn’t he love to remove ANCIENT text? just like that supposedly hidden comment about Jesus being born on a day of other deities? Talk about arbitrary and hypocrisy!) that it would flow again. Oh but that’s not all of the arbitrary logic of Jan: During the above statements at some point he also made this nonsensical argument against the Shroud (and it shows how arbitrary he was being), “…unless you want to study the History Channel, and it’s credentials have been damaged by all the questionable stuff they’ve been putting out over the years” OH BUT NOT COAST TO COAST AM THE VERY SHOW YOU ARE SPEAKING ON? JAN: GIORGIO TSOUKALOUS HAS BEEN A REPEAT GUEST ON COAST TO COAST AM AND ENDORSED BY GEORGE NOORY, ART BELL AND GEORGE KNAPP, all of whom are hosts of the show. They’ve also had the other “UFO experts” on Coast BEFORE they were on the History Channel. And how is it a valid argument to merely say, “Oh they had some questionable stuff on there over the years.” BUT YOU’RE SILLY CLAIMS THAT CHRISTIANITY IS BASED ON SHROOMS ISN’T? SO THE HISTORY CHANNEL DOESN’T PUT OUT ANYTHING HISTORICALLY RELIABLE IN COMPARISON TO YOU!? SHUT UP!!!!!! THERE WAS AN GLOBAL WARMING SCAREMONGER ASTROLOGER FALSE PROPHET ON COAST JUST BEFORE YOU GOT ON! Can anyone give me a “WOW”!? Who in the world doesn’t know that Coast to Coast AM is a mouth for New Age babbling idiots and every arbitrary ranting parrot and ignorant out there? The History Channel is miles away from Coast to Coast AM! Though sadly the gap is closed a little by putting on Giorgio Tsoukalos, who claims that UFOs are what is behind the Bible. Now if Jan were more intelligent, he would have said, “Well UFOs look like mushroom because they are round and dome-shaped, so clearly the writers of the Bible were seeing mushrooms while high on mushrooms.” But instead he decided to get angry right away and shoot himself in the foot with an arbitrary argument. And as if YOU were more credible than Tsoukalos? TSOUKALOS IS LIGHT YEARS MORE CREDIBLE THAN YOU! At least he does come up with evidence for some of his theories, but you, asking, “Why are presents put under a Christmas tree,” think you are spurious with a stupid “proof” like that, that you should be taken seriously?! You’re either an arrogant liar or blind.

Oh but that’s not all: after giving a speech about the JFK assassination, he criticizes those who don’t think it’s a conspiracy for “not having critical judgment and not being able to see when someone is trying to deceive them.” Jan, “You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”

I have a question for you Jan: If Christianity was based on Shamanism and mushrooms, why does Christianity, all the way back to when it was supposedly “Judaism” (which is a myth that you perpetuate), why then does it forbid magic? Second: why did you laugh when a moron caller called in saying that he WAS going to make a religion (as if he knew the future) based on shrooms and listening to Jimmy Hendrix, Pink Floyd and the Beatles, and that he wasn’t going to include doctrine because it was creepy. You laughed and said “really” in agreement, but then after the host, Rob Simone mentioned recreational drug use, contradicted your arbitrary hatred by then saying that recreational drug usage, which you implied was bad, was bad because it was devoid of religion which it had been stripped of? As for “the owness” is on us, Jan, another question: the owness is also on you to prove your claim that Christianity is based on the visions of people who hate psychedelic mushrooms, and you haven’t come up with any except for a little of your opinions which you speak of as facts.

A few minutes later, still going on about the JFK assassination still 40 minutes away from the end of the show (wow: nothing more to say about the theory of Christianity and shrooms? Big surprise!” he said concerning someone’s conspiracy theory on JFK’s murder: “I would need more proof before I would settle on anything positive about that.” But with the most subjective evidence and nonsensical evidence you’ve decided that Christianity is just babble from people high on mushrooms, and that the Shroud of Turin is just a cloth that was made by lying it on someone’s body (lol, hence why it’s been controversial and repeatedly attempted to be shown to be not miraculous for decades?! HUH?)

Another question for you Jan: how are you credible when you advise people to have false visions (hallucinations) based on drugs? Can the truth be based on lies and imaginary things? How about using “critical thinking” and “studying logic” which you advise with your mouth but refuse to do yourself when it comes to the Bible and the usefulness of having hallucinations? Write after I asked that question I’ve now heard him say to a caller, “unless you have evidence coming in through your five senses you’re arguing the arbitrary”. And you have evidence coming in through all five of your senses that the Bible is false? You can smell that the Bible is false?! Are you high on shrooms? And no, arguing something without having evidence “coming in” through all five of your senses isn’t defined as “arbitrary”. Wow: as I was typing that previous sentence Jan mentioned “logical fallacies”. What in the world does Jan know about logical fallacies? You can’t make sense when arguing against the greatest most time-tested book in the world yet speak like you have knowledge of logical fallacies? What astounding arrogance. What a blasphemer. … Wow, now he said that if you read the work of some guy, who went line by line over the evidence for the historical Jesus, and, “If we remove the logical fallacies” that we’ll know the truth, which is that Jesus wasn’t real. Wow, stupid. So it’s logical to selective take the work of one obscure man, and say, “Therefore that’s evidence Jesus wasn’t real.” You can’t present any strong evidence of your own? No you can’t, hence why you have to weasel your way out of arguing against Jesus being real. It is you who are being ARBITRARY with your logic and your “proof”.

THE OWNESS IS ON YOU, not the other way around, because hundreds of millions of people who’ve died promoting real evidence for Christ and hundreds of millions more who are living who promote the same and more outnumber your “many” fake scholars. And this man you say who went through the proof for Christ by going through it “line by line” (and Christians don’t go through the Bible line by line, or arbitrary arguments from morons like you – I’ve been through 500 of them Jan, I wrote them down, no matter how stupid and grammatically nonsensical), Jan: the entire Bible is evidence for Christ, he endorsed it all, it’s not just “the gospels” as you seem to believe. You seem to believe it’s just the gospels and a few historical references to him: NO IT’S NOT. And you really think that one many can disprove thousands of years of scholars and the hundred thousand archeologists and theologians living today? The evidence is the entire Bible and all the historical references to him outside the Bible, and the archeological evidence, and the prophecies that have come true, and the experiences of all those who have been saved by him, and the miracles that still occur today. Haven’t you ever heard of “Evidence That Demands a Verdict”? For someone to say that one many going “line by line” through the evidence and having found evidence against it all, is utterly stupid and a plain lie. You have to know you are lying, and if not, you’re extremely ignorant and argue out of ignorance, which is what you say is, “arbitrary arguing.”

And Jan: the prophecies are clear, that the Old Testament spoke of him. Only someone stupid and deluded who after CAREFULLY examining the evidence for these prophecies would deny that they are true. And why wouldn’t you believe being that you believe in magic and religion? And you refer to “many” scholars who side with you: WHO? AND WHAT IS THEIR MAIN AND/OR SECONDARY FIELD OF STUDY? Who Jan? Carl Sagan? Julia Childs? Martha Stewart? Paris Hilton? Ted Turner? Bill Gates? Donald Trump? There are more scholars in opposition to yours, real scholars of Biblical archeology, real scholars of the Shroud of Turin, real theologians, who don’t get high on drugs as a main method of learning the truth, who stay in their right mind and don’t rely on false visions and hallucinations, yet you act like because you merely say “many” that that is proof enough. The Bible says not to be filled with wine, but with the Spirit, not “mushrooms”. The “owness” is on you, you “owe” us the proof that mere mushrooms are at the core of Christianity.

May God unblind him, remove his hypocrisy from him, and save him.

More Information:

The Shroud of Turin (This site is very extensive).
Evidence That Demands a Verdict, Volume 1: Historical Evidences for the Christian Faith

An Angry Jew Wants Christians to Protest Against Muslims Because ”Jesus was a Jew”

November 17, 2011 1 comment

This is my response to the Jewish female Linda Rivera of New York who on 11.17.11 in response to the article Jew-haters welcome in EU. She said the various things I’ve bolded here in the order she wrote them, in which she either is not aware of Christians always being vilified for being murderers of Arabs and Muslims and Muslims wishing to enslave or murder them, or because she’s not satisfied with even that, and wants to murder Christians herself for not doing more to get themselves all murdered by Muslims (there’s just no pleasing some people, and they’ll damn you no matter what you do):

“In hating Jews, they hate Jesus because Jesus was a JEW.”

Who are you talking to? Are you accusing yourself in the mirror?

“Jesus kept Saturday Sabbath, Passover, and all of the holy days.”

Are you one of those stupid people that thinks “Jew” means “religion” “judaism”? So you’re a racist who doesn’t believe that Jews exist, they’re just “a religious group.” You’re that dumb? So Jewish atheists agnostics in Israel and elsewhere are a non-people then. Racist. It’s stupid ignorance like Jews from you which is why Jews have such a low standing in the world. If you don’t even know how to define yourselves, I’m talking about Jews in general, how then is anyone else supposed to understand you or care when you speak?

“Jesus taught from the Jewish Scriptures (Old Testament) in synagogues and in the Jewish Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.”

And with his words created the New Testament and preached to the world, not just Jews, and THE JEWS REJECTED HIM with the exception of a small few and the apostle Paul as well as the prophets before him said that Israel’s heart would remain hardened against God till the end of the last days. The Old Testament from which Jesus preached also shows that 99 percent of all Jews rejected God. You’re taking God’s word out of context, and it’s absolutely truly extremely disgustingly stupid that you gloss over the entire history of the Old Testament and turn it into, “Jews are good and not to be disliked.”

“When the Jew haters got control of the church,”

You sound like a Palestinian, a Muslim. “The Bible has been corrupted, you can’t trust it.” “Christians take the Bible out of context which is why they won’t accept the prophet Muhammed.” You hate Arabs and Muslims and foreigners and use the same arguments they use while pretending not to be a bigot! Talk about “wicked.”

“they got rid of all of the JEWISH things that Jesus the Jew did.” No, Paul said, “Let no one judge you with regard to holy days.” Christians in general chose not to spend their time observing holy days and chose to switch from Saturday to Sunday to distinguish themselves from the Jews, and there is evidence it’s also because God moved the day over, possibly for the same reason, and no doubt as a thorn to bother the Jews so that they’d have yet another evil and silly excuse to reject the Messiah.

“If Jesus had been born in our time period, from the time his mother carried Jesus in her womb, Jesus, his mother and family would be targeted for MURDER by the Islamics for being JEWS living in their JEWISH homeland.”

First you libel and defame Christians, then all the sudden switch to Muslims. How many logical fallacies are you going to commit? You sound like a liberal, aka, a pleasure-addicted idiot. “Muslims hate Jews therefore Christians are evil.” Are you retarded? “Christians don’t sacrifice animals like the Jews are commanded too and which the Jews do every day for their sins therefore Muslims hate Jesus.” Confused much? So when is the last time you sacrificed an animal, miss true Christian? Because, don’t you know, Jesus did it, therefore so should we. Why don’t you go look up the logical fallacy lists that atheists are always copying and pasting but never read? Wait… are you an atheist?

“In the filthy Islamic invasion of the Church of Nativity in Bethlehem, Judea, Israel, Muslims TORE UP BIBLES FOR TOILET PAPER.”

Therefore Christians should yell down Muslims and tear them up and wipe Palestine off the face of the earth so that Jews won’t feel so guilty about mistreating them all the time. That’s a Catholic shrine by the way, please stop pretending all Christians are part of that giant cult. But since you do, or that ignorant about Christians, it’s obvious that you could care less about Christianity or religion. What you want is revenge so that you can feel good when you ignore God every day and not have to think, “God is punishing me with these thorns he’s left in Israel to remind me of my disobedience.”

“Where are the protests from these so-called Christians? Disgusting hypocrites.”

Jesus whom you declare to be good and holy already told you and often via the mouths of these disgusting hypocrites when they protested against the evil Catholic cult that persecuted Jews, Miss “Jesus was a Jew who endorsed the Law and the Prophets therefore Christians should obey him”. I shall repeat what the Son of Solomon said to you, again, and hopefully you won’t close your heart and ears again:

“Blessed are you when people hate you, when they exclude you and insult you and reject your name as evi because of the Son of Man. Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, because great is your reward in heaven. For that is how their ancestors treated the prophets. But woe to you who are rich, for you have already received your comfort. Woe to you who are well fed now, for you will go hungry. Woe to you who laugh now, for you will mourn and weep. Woe to you when everyone speaks well of you, for that is how their ancestors treated the false prophets. But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also. If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you would have them do to you. If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that. And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, expecting to be repaid in full. But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful. Don’t judge: and you will not be judged. Don’t condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.” He also told them this parable: “Can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into a pit? The student is not above the teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like their teacher. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when you yourself fail to see the plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”

“Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven. So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Don’t be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.
“This, then, is how you should pray: ‘Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name, your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us today our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.’ For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15 But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins.

When you fast, do not look somber as the hypocrites do, for they disfigure their faces to show others they are fasting. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you fast, put oil on your head and wash your face, so that it will not be obvious to others that you are fasting, but only to your Father, who is unseen; and your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”

Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!” Jesus replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? 4 For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’ and ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’ But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is ‘devoted to God,’ they are not to ‘honor their father or mother’ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you: “‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules.’” Jesus called the crowd to him and said, “Listen and understand. What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them.” Then the disciples came to him and asked, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?” He replied, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots. Leave them; they are blind guides. If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.” Peter said, “Explain the parable to us.” “Are you still so dull?” Jesus asked them. “Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? But the things that come out of a person’s mouth come from the heart, and these defile them. For out of the heart come evil thoughts—murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what defile a person; but eating with unwashed hands does not defile them.”

the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to him with a question. “Teacher,” they said, “Moses told us that if a man dies without having children, his brother must marry the widow and raise up offspring for him. Now there were seven brothers among us. The first one married and died, and since he had no children, he left his wife to his brother. The same thing happened to the second and third brother, right on down to the seventh. Finally, the woman died. Now then, at the resurrection, whose wife will she be of the seven, since all of them were married to her?” Jesus replied, “You are in error because you don’t know the Scriptures or the power of God. At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven. But about the resurrection of the dead—have you not read what God said to you, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not the God of the dead but of the living.” When the crowds heard this, they were astonished at his teaching. Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, the Pharisees got together. One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” Whose Son Is the Messiah? While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, “What do you think about the Messiah? Whose son is he?” “The son of David,” they replied. He said to them, “How is it then that David, speaking by the Spirit, calls him ‘Lord’? For he says, ‘The Lord said to my Lord: Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet.’ If then David calls him ‘Lord,’ how can he be his son?” No one could say a word in reply, and from that day on no one dared to ask him any more questions.”

Related Information:

Haider visit infuriates anti-Nazi protesters
The Cost of Israel to US Taxpayers
Answering Islam
A Biblical Response to Rabbi Tovia Singer’s Outreach Judaism
The Genealogy of Jesus
Comments on Disputes Concerning the Genealogy of Jesus

Categories: Judaism Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Last Days

September 2, 2011 Leave a comment

Like many others, I continue thinking about how long it will be before the AntiChrist shows up, because after his 7 year terror, the world will finally, mostly, have peace. The Bible teaches things will get worse in the last days. Though things may have gotten better in that God raised up millions to be saved, and saved them, at the same time it could be said things were getting worse, because the world has been deliberately fighting against whatever true evidence came up for the true religion, and not just that, but in certain ways, became more rebellious. For example, many atheists arose and murdered hundreds of millions, and many people with so called “anti-social” personality disorders have appeared, and because of Satan blinding the minds of the world, instead of a decrease in mental disorders, there is an increase. Anti-social people are like viruses, who, by their actions spread their bad behavior. And as the world gets worse, decent and righteous Christians will get more worn down, more drained of money, and the churches of the fake ones will also fall apart under the strain and be out to save themselves by evil means, and that will like putting fuel on the fire. Crime/lawlessness will get worse and worse, and stuffing people in jail or prison will also make things worse, because it will increase bitterness and put more money into the hands of corrupt police and corruptions officers and the jail owners. And more children will be left without good parenting. I think like computer chips doubling in power every few years, so the wickedness of the world also doubles every few years. At some point, it will get so bad, that the governmental systems of the world will begin disintegrating. Because of that, there will be even more rulers. Because there won’t be enough money for large governments, and because of the mistrust people will have of them, they will want something simpler, kings, dictators or generals. And many will prefer anarchy because of having no more trust in any kind of government authority. During this breakdown, production of technology will slow rapidly, and there will be even more poor. Eventually, bullets and guns will become rare, and knives, swords, spears, staffs and clubs will take their place. The rich of the world will probably be living in glorious high tech cities, and because many of them will be narcissists, they will not try to help the poor outside of their cities, but be happy to ignore them for some supposed good cause. They will either actually believe that their cause is just, like depopulating the world to save it from global warming, or pollution, or babies being born miserable because of poverty, or will instead be deliberately crushing the poor and “common people” for pleasure. The breakdown will also be due to the Bible being ignored, because it is the best book to heed for self-control and progressing. There are no comparable alternatives to the Bible. And once preaching of the Bible becomes rare, the world will have reverted back to the way it was during ancient times, but in a worse way, because many hundreds of millions among the world, will know right from wrong, meaning, the commandments, but will ignore them and do as they please instead. God will also harden the hearts of the Gentiles/world, so that few to none will be saved till he returns. Any young children growing up at this time will probably have very little knowledge of the Bible. And when those children grow up and hear Christians pointing out to them that the AntiChrist has come to power in fulfillment of Biblical prophecy, one of them being that evidence for the world leader being the AntiChrist is that his name adds up to make 666, will be laughed at as desperate conspiracy theorists of religion near extinction.

My best guess is that from today there is twenty to forty years left before this age ends. And that is well within my life time, not some convenient climate change geek or new age prophet’s “in 100 TO 1000 years from now the world will be on fire [and I promise I care! so have sex with and worship my nerd self all you beautiful women!]” prophecy.

There’s another reason that I think there’s only a few decades left: there exists information regarding how to create energy sources greater than a typical nuclear power plant, greater than the planned fusion reactors, and the ancient knowledge of how to levitate objects. If someone discovers how to levitate objects, meaning neutralize the effect of gravity on them, it would cause a panic of the ruling rich of the world, who would fear that they could be toppled with such knowledge. They would in my opinion try to accelerate the collapse of the world economy and try even harder to vacuum in the wealth around them. The Vatican would be one of those vacuums from Hell. I have more insight into what would happen, but I’ll save that for later.

Easter, Materialism and Atheism

Found an interesting article just now, less than three months old, in a place I didn’t expect:

How Easter and Christianity undermine atheism
By Anthony DeStefano
4/26/2011 3:09 PM

This Easter it seems that atheists have a lot to rejoice about. According to the latest data in the American Religious Identification Survey, the number of self-proclaimed atheists in America has nearly doubled since 2001 — from 900,000 to 1.6 million.

In a nation that once prided itself on its Judeo-Christian heritage, one out of every five Americans now claims no religious identity whatsoever; and the number of self-proclaimed Christians has declined by a whopping 15%.

Yes, those who believe in nothing seem to be winning more and more converts every year.

The superstition of atheism

Of course, it’s not quite fair to say that atheists believe in nothing. They do believe in something — the philosophical theory known as Materialism, which states that the only thing that exists is matter; that all substances and all phenomena in the universe are purely physical.

The problem is that this really isn’t a theory at all. It’s a superstition; a myth that basically says that everything in life — our thoughts, our emotions, our hopes, our ambitions, our passions, our memories, our philosophies, our politics, our beliefs in God and salvation and damnation — that all of this is merely the result of biochemical reactions and the movement of molecules in our brain.

What nonsense. – More here

I remembered a few minutes before posting this article, that I had discovered an evidence that God is not a being that needed to be created. It was an evidence I had discovered about a week ago. Maybe I’ll talk about it later.

Related Information:

Scientific contradictions in materialism (alternate post here.

Materialism of the Gaps

Information on Tesla and Thomas Edison Updated

I finally updated the article on Tesla and Edison and changed the title seeing that I was wrong to say Edison was an atheist was wrong (I shouldn’t have assumed). I also found out some information very damaging to atheism about Edison and about Blavatsky which is damaging to the more modern neo-pagan movement.

Steve Quayle On the Alex Jones Show Again

May 25, 2010 1 comment

I listened to Steve Quayle on the Alex Jones podcast today, and noticed he didn’t once say “Okay” like he often does on Coast to Coast. Maybe he read my comment about it, or his pretty wife saw my post and told him to stop, or maybe it’s a style he reserves to annoy the audience of C2C. I don’t remember what Alex and Steve were going on about (on and on and on), because as usual, Alex and Steve were talking like a volcano had just exploded and the lava was about to cover the planet, which wears me out knowing nothing like that is true.

Both Steve and Alex are big on defending yourself with guns to protect yourself from violent acts against yourself, and are friends with such people, if you didn’t know already. Such an attitude isn’t compatible with Christianity ever since Jesus and Paul taught to obey whatever government is over you, and this is further evidence that Alex and and Steve are not saved Christians.

Here’s a related topic to whether or not you should obey a government over you that is evil. It seems to teach you shouldn’t obey a government that works against Christianity, that is “evil” in the mind of a Christian, however Jesus said not to resist an evil man, and he meant any, But obviously he didn’t mean obey evil commands since the Old and New Testaments teach to obey God over anyone else. The Christians who lived under the Roman Empire, which was very evil in God’s eyes, obeyed it, including Paul, so no one can say you shouldn’t obey a corrupt government. And consider that if you shouldn’t, then should children obey evil parents? Paul also told slaves to obey their masters and wives to obey their husbands, even if they were not saved. But that article seems to teach not to obey a government that a Christian personally perceives as evil, or that is highly imperfect, and that’s not true as I pointed out, and besides that, there is no perfect government except the one headed directly by God.