Home > Energy, evolution propaganda > ‘Fossil Fuels’ Discovered In Space, Again | Evolutionists Faced With Reality Again

‘Fossil Fuels’ Discovered In Space, Again | Evolutionists Faced With Reality Again

Complex organic matter discovered throughout the Universe
00:42 October 28, 2011
By Darren Quick

A spectrum from the Infrared Space Observatory superimposed on an image of the Orion Nebula where the complex organics are found

Researchers at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) claim to have solved the mystery of “Unidentified Infrared Emission features” that have been detected in stars, interstellar space, and galaxies. For over two decades, the most commonly accepted theory regarding this phenomenon was that these signatures come from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules – simple organic molecules made of carbon and hydrogen atoms. Now HKU researchers say the substances generating these signatures are actually complex organic compounds that are made naturally by stars and ejected into interstellar space.

The team of Prof. Sun Kwok and Dr. Yong Zhang used observations taken by the Infrared Space Observatory and the Spitzer Space Telescope of stardust formed in exploding stars called novae to show that the astronomical spectra contain a mixture of aromatic (ring-like) and aliphatic (chain-like) components that cannot be explained by PAH molecules.

The researchers say the substances generating these infrared emissions actually have chemical structures that are so complex that their structure resembles those of coal and petroleum. Since coal and petroleum are remnants of ancient life (does Darren even realize what he’s saying? Look at that, Darren, an evolutionist, in denial, even though he’s reporting on astronomy that is only supposed to support evolution but yet clearly isn’t) and this type of organic matter was only thought to arise from living organisms, the researchers say this suggests that complex organic compounds can be synthesized in space even when no life forms are present. (That sentence didn’t make any grammatical sense. Darren just said that these researchers are saying that stars can make petroleum because it’s believe that it came from [dead remains] of ancient life and because it was only thought to “arise”, wow “arise” nice flowery big word), from living organisms. No Darren, that’s not why they think they found oil in space, unless they are kook scientists and crazed hacks at science pretending to know what they are talking about like you are. And no sane scientist has said they come from living lifeforms let alone ancient living ones as you nonsensically implied with your poor superfluous wording. All you had to say was “SOME scientists claim that oil comes from millions of years old dead remains” and if you had an ounce of honesty in that mind would also have said that some scientists say it is continually being produced by the grinding up rock under great heat and pressure and perhaps also processed by thermophile bacteria to produce petroleum.)

Supporting an earlier idea by Kwok that old stars are molecular factories capable of manufacturing organic compounds, they say that not only are stars producing this complex matter on extremely short time scales of weeks, but they are also ejecting it into the general interstellar space in between stars.

“Our work has shown that stars have no problem making complex organic compounds under near-vacuum conditions,” says Kwok. “Theoretically, this is impossible, but observationally we can see it happening.” – more here

And when did the “fossil fuel” blind guide “judgmental” hypocrites already find this out only to keep repeating their fossil fuel mind-numbing, blissfully ignorant, children’s fantasy propaganda? (more like miserable zombie brain nonsense):

New data: Maybe oil isn’t from dead dinos
Saturn moon has more hydrocarbons than all of Earth’s known reserves

215\2008\6:52 PM Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi

Saturn’s moon Titan has hundreds of times more liquid hydrocarbons than all the known oil and natural gas reserves on Earth, according to a team of Johns Hopkins University scientists, adding to evidence that oil is not biological in origin.

The scientists at the Laurel, Md., institution were reporting this week on data collected from NASA’s Cassini probe.

“Several hundred lakes or seas have been discovered, of which dozens are estimated to contain more hydrocarbon liquid than the entire known oil and gas reserves on Earth,” wrote lead scientist Ralph Lorenz of the university’s Applied Physics Laboratory in the Jan. 29 issue of the Geophysical Research Letters. – more here

Unfortunately Jerome Corsi is a Catholic, which is worse than an atheist, because Jerome confesses the Bible to be true, and God’s word, and even gives out evidence for it, like the Shroud of Turin, yet leads people down the wrong path, down to Hell with his suffer-for-your-own-sins and do good deeds gospel, which is no good news at all. It’s a contradictory impossible path, as God demonstrated on Israel and their endless failure to obey God’s Law, and despite that some boast about knowing how many laws there are in the “first half” of the Bible.

Also interesting is that the Mainstream Science cult is hiding these discoveries (guess why). Is it on Sciencedaily, which shows off stories even from many years ago? No. Though right now they are declaring the fantasy evolutionary tree of Mollusks has just been completed lol. Delusional! Propaganda! Stupid! Waste of time and money that could be used on space exploration and COLONIZATION and exofuel mining, and advanced in medicine (not vaccines or “cures” for sexually transmitted diseases for kids – sounds like a child molester’s fantasy), transportation, computer power, artificial intelligence, software, agriculture, mining, fireproofing, oceanic exploration and colonization, housing, optics, sensors, communications, sanitation and recycling. Not, “Look I discovered all there is about mollusks over billions of years, trust me and waste your time reading this story to become a confused delusional zombie who will only listen to other evolutionists and stupidly laugh whenever you just hear the word creationist or creationism or intelligent design, or Christian or religious scientist.” Nor does Sciencedaily’s sister anti-Christian propaganda site Phys.org carry this story (these sites are almost identical except phys.org has a forum and seems to lack the videos of Sciencedaily).

Advertisements
  1. Jemara
    November 6, 2011 at 4:48 AM

    LOL Do you actually believe that dead organisms are the only thing capable of making organic hydrocarbons?

  2. legacypk
    January 25, 2012 at 4:28 PM

    “Stop preaching your “there is no God!” dogma”.
    we don’t preach, we help guide people through the works and evidence. So hypocritical considering Christians just LOVE to talk about their god and how you should love him too.

    “But obviously there is one”

    Prove it. Evidence? you have none. bible and faith does not count.

    “It’s about hating God and wanting to take his place and tell everyone what right and wrong is and forcing your feelings down their throats”

    We can’t hate something that doesn’t exist. We shouldn’t have to tell people what right or wrong is, everyone intuitively can figure out that. It’s subjective, not something that “god” came up with.

    The rest of your comment is just trash.
    DISMISSED.

    • January 25, 2012 at 8:12 PM

      “Stop preaching your “there is no God!” dogma”.
      we don’t preach, we help guide people through the works and evidence.

      And the next sentence doesn’t explain what that evidence is, so you’ve just given further evidence that you’re preaching dogma. Typical cultist atheist repeating in bias without giving evidence but merely claiming to have evidence, typical repetition without reasoning. Stop repeating and start thinking.

      “Prove it. Evidence?”

      Moron: this tiny article presented evidence that evolutionism was wrong about fuels coming from dead matter and is one more piece of evidence in a mountain of other evidences that it is a false science. How did that not get through to you? Are you an idiot? Truly. Is this the first time you’ve come across evidence evolutionism is false? Obviously not from your hateful twit response, so why are you pretending that this is all there is idiot? You seriously are such a blinded horse that you can’t see any other topics in this journal let alone the rest of the Internet? And moron: “proof” is not the same as evidence. You’re an ignorant who doesn’t know the meanings of basic words but is playing Dismissing Five Second Preacher Teacher. Further: you didn’t bother to read, as you yourself said. Truly, a moron.

      “you have none.”

      Because you said so with faith that you are right, therefore you are right. Wrong. If you didn’t even bother to read this short article, how in the world can you know anything let alone know what to argue against? And is this the only page on my journal? No moron, OBVIOUSLY NOT. And is it the only page of evidence on the net? NO MORON, OBVIOUSLY NOT. You’re, a moron.

      “bible and faith does not count.”

      And neither does your dogma, your faith, your empty repetition and empty insistance. No: because the ignoramus who doesn’t know the meaning of evidence, and thinks it’s his repetition and emotionalism, is evidence, says soke it so does not make it so. You don’t know a think about the Bible. But to teach your idiot self a lesson, a little lesson, lazy moron: it’s a book of history, not just laws, which archeologist after archeologist has shown to be accurate. But a moron like you doesn’t want to listen carefully, so there is no point going into detail with a moron like you, especially being that it’s already been written and put into videos. And moron: faith from God counts, he is evidently perfectly truthful as the Bible and other evidence shows, and therefore, if he says faith is evidence of his existence, then I have faith, with evidence, that he is telling the truth. But you? Who in the world are you that I should listen? You don’t even know what evidence or proof means!

      DISMISSED (and no, didn’t bother to read the rest of your babble in between silly parrot, and you yourself said you ignored what I said, and so ignored the evidence, and like a typical assuming ignorant cultist moron does who ignores and repeats to no end).

      And Mr. Dismissed: You seem sound like a narcissist Mr. Convenient Dismisser Rather Than Thinker. You can read about that mental disorder here: http://narcissist.tk

      Now to continue to obey God, who said to avoid arguments of ignorance, and you truly are an ignorant. Therefore, nothing more from you will be read till you show with your deeds that you have learned your lesson.

      • george
        January 26, 2012 at 12:13 PM

        Get a clue you idiot. you know nothing about evolution to be saying that outrageous BS!! Evolution is a fact

      • January 26, 2012 at 7:19 PM

        Thanks for providing more evidence that all atheists are hateful irrational morons who use emotionalism and insults for evidence rather than actual evidence, and thanks for helping to disprove vin1 your atheist friend here. Get a clue: creationism is a fact, stop pretending you can’t see design when evolutionist scientist themselves keep saying DNA is programmed and that everything is designed. Dead mindless things don’t design hyper-complex things, that includes brains and biological systems. Get those fingers our of your ears and blindfold off your eyes and stop repeating “nanny nanny boo boo I hate you you idiot” and start thinking. Stop assuming in your hatred and bias and do what God commands: “Don’t lie”, “Don’t steal”, “Don’t murder”, “Honor your father and mother”, “Don’t commit adultery”, “Don’t covet”, and remember that it is God who saves from Hell, not yourself (remember the Sabbath day of rest from your works and remember God’s works, that HE CREATED THE UNIVERSE IN SIX DAYS).

  3. January 26, 2012 at 5:21 AM

    I have no idea why you are so angry about this article. Petroleum on the earth is definitely the product of heat and pressure generation from buried organic remains, and while the seemingly spontaneous generation of hydrocarbons or PAHs specifically by stars was not considered possible, I don’t think it has any bearing on terrestrial hydrocarbons. I don’t believe petroleum geologists are telling people that organic matter decomposition is the *only* was to create hydrocarbons, rather that OM decomposition best describes the origin of hydrocarbons in terrestrial sediments.

    In fact, this discovery makes some sense because we have found organic-like material on meteorites that seem to indicate this material A) comes from outside the earth and B) dates to a far distant time. If PAHs are found scattered around interstellar space, it could explain the presence of these materials on meteorites. It could also lend some weight to the theory, and it is a theory that organic life on earth was originally seeded from meteorites.

    • January 26, 2012 at 6:51 PM

      “I have no idea why you are so angry about this article.” What are you talking about moron? Stop making procreatory comments you weasel. What part is “so angry” And massive smug hypocrite and provacateur, why aren’t you so angry at the atheist here I previously replied to spouting dogma with a narcissistic pretense? Hypocrite? Can you explain that you hypocrite fault-finder? BECAUSE YOU ARE BIASED. THAT IS OBVIOUS.

      You’ve already revealed yourself to be a moron from the start. Continuing with your careless stupidity: “Petroleum on the earth is definitely the product of heat and pressure generation from buried organic remains,” because you said so and emnotionalized it with “definitely”? Whatever you say is true without having to put up evidence? No moron I will not have faith in whatever you say without evidence. And you committed the logical fallacy of subject-switching and vaguery: THE TOPIC IS FOSSIL FUELS AS IN ANCIENT DEAD MATTER FROM BILLIONS OF YEARS AGO NOT MERE “BURIED ORGANIC MATTER” you weasel. HOW MANY TIMES DOES IT NEED TO BE POINTED OUT TO MORONS LIKE YOURSELF THAT TO CLAIM YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED OVER BILLIONS OF YEARS WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE IS TO HAVE A DELUSION OF GRANDEUR? Are you God that you could know what happened over billions of years without any evidence?

      If my comments are angry Mr. Vague “about the article” whatever that means, can you figure out why at this point?

      “and while the seemingly spontaneous generation of hydrocarbons or PAHs specifically by stars was not considered possible” by EVOLUTIONISTS LIKE YOURSELF MORON, STOP SPEAKING FOR ALL, THAT IS ANOTHER FALLACY, STOP PRETENDING NO CHRISTIAN CAN KNOW SOMETHING YOU DON’T, THAT NO CHRISTIANS ARE SCIENTISTS EITHER, EVIL MORON. STOP STEREOTYPING BIGOT.

      “I don’t think it has any bearing on terrestrial hydrocarbons.” now that’s some awesome scientific work right there, your “bearing” and “I don’t FEEL” emotionalism, your, “I have faith that we’re right.” You time-waster. Your problem is that you not only don’t understand science, you don’t understand logic, hence your repeated slip ups and reading into things that aren’t there, you’re assumptions. Stop assuming, there’s a major way to prevent most logical fallacies.

      “I don’t believe”, great you don’t have faith in “petroleum geologists are telling people that organic matter decomposition is the *only* was to create hydrocarbons, rather that OM decomposition best describes the origin of hydrocarbons in terrestrial sediments.” Translation:

      “*Sticking fingers in ears*: I can’t hear you Christians, I can’t hear alternative theories for where the oil came from, nope, I’m going to pretend that this article was the only thing I’ve ever heard of and without any evidence continue to push evolution propaganda.” Okay parrot, go away then, “DISMISSED” as your atheist moron ally said to me.

      “In fact, this discovery makes some sense because we have found organic-like material on meteorites that seem to indicate this material A) comes from outside the earth and B) dates to a far distant time.” What great scientific evidence again: “seems to indicate”. That is thee logical fallacy of begging the question: WHY DOES IT SEEM TO INDICATE THIS MR. SCIENTIFIC GENIUS? You give no explanation. You might as well have said, “Bananas taste good there fore oranges are orange, which seems to indicate the universe is billions of years old and fuel comes from rotted dinosaurs.” And again: seems to indicate to who? To everyone? To creationists? Stop speaking for all, or stop being vague. And listen to your stretch: “organic-like material” = oil on Earth comes from dead dinosaurs/”organic matter” under pressure over billions of years. You call that “science”? Then you’re no scientist, but creationists that follow the rules of logic are scientists. You are like a “word of faith” preacher, a “name it and claim it” preacher. A false teacher is what you are.

      “If PAHs are found scattered around interstellar space, it could explain the presence of these materials on meteorites.” Huh? Listen to how crazy you are: first you say the hydros in space are of no consequence (and because you feel so on top of it), then say organic-LIKE materials on meteors are evidence of the universe being billions of years old and evidence that dead dinosaurs in a pressure cooker make oil. Then you say the organic-like matter on meteors might be from the space hydros, and DON’T MAKE A POINT with that statement. Are you crazy, massively blinded by Satan and tripping all over your thoughts and anti-Bible propaganda in your confusion?

      “It could also lend some weight to the theory”, What could lend weight to what theory? You’re rambling. “and it is a theory that organic life on earth was originally seeded from meteorites.” Is “and” to join the previous thought logical grammar? But so now from all that nonsense to another disjointed tack-on anti-Bible propaganda theory: that meteors “seeded life” from “organic-like” whatevers. Absurd stretches and reaches and God-hating avoidance is what you just wasted God’s time with. And no doubt many atheists will continue to ignore hat I say despite demanding I read every word of their ranting and accuse me of not listening. What hypocrisy.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: