Yet More Evidence of the Worldwide Flood of Noah and That Life on Earth is Not ‘Billions and Billions of Years Old’
“Living fossil” shrimp, living for thousands of years in the middle high above dry desert land. Clearly the shrimp, the “living fossil shrimp”, which are sea animals, did not evolve to live in the middle of the desert any more than the Sonoran fish did. Obviously, they were deposited their by the Flood of Noah, by God’s hand and breath. Or is there some evolutionist who would like to argue, “Well hundreds of thousands of years ago the deserts used to be oceans, and I was there too see that as it slowly dried up, only two types of little shrimp and one kind of fish were able to evolve to live in the desert, out of billions of other sea animals, and that’s because, well because of randomness.” Not “Well” at all. Randomness did not do it, and if two oceans dried up and or moved away slowly over hundreds of thousands of years, then obviously, if macro-evolution were true, many more other types and kinds of animals should have evolved to live in desert land. There is no reason why two types of little shrimp and one type of little fish should be the only, or among the very few sea animals, or even fresh water lake animals, to survive in the desert, and not other animals.
On top of that, to think that over hundreds of thousands of years, that no men would destroyed the tiny habitat of these few animals, or storms, is absurd.
Obviously, macro-evolution is a myth, and the reason so few sea animals were able animals were able to survive, is because God gave limited adaptability to the kinds of creatures he made. He didn’t design them to turn into other animals or to be able to magically produce new genetic information or organs or other features from nowhere that would allow them adapt to any non-sudden situation.
I realized about 30 mins ago that those who don’t believe in God mere because they can’t see him, have that attitude towards other amazing things too. It’s obviously a bitter childish response to God not giving them their way and showing them whatever they want to see. They think they can anger and annoy him into doing what they want him to do. That is why there are so many “Skeptics”, people who disbelieve anything amazing, or in a great change, at least what they think is amazing or a great change. Evolutionists are very arbitrary with their skepticism:
They believe in the amazingly long existence that the universe and Earth and the living things on Earth have had, including living fossils and millions of years old organic matter surviving still with moisture in it and DNA, and in massive catastrophes which killed trillions of animals leaving sea fossils all over the world (but not a worldwide flood!), all things they’ve never seen and have a far far less of a chance of seeing than a creationist has of seeing what happened for the past 6,500 years according to the known odds. An despite knowing that there are many living fossils, these evolutionists declare any animal they find int he fossil record that they don’t know exists as “extinct”. This is because of their abhorrence for truth that contradicts their belief that God had anything to do with the universe, at least beyond causing the their imaginary Small Bomb to make a big universe-sized explosion (which of course they witnessed in person tens of billions of years ago; not). They sense or know that living fossils contradict their faith that God doesn’t exist or has not created anything, and in their hatred they try to forget the evidence that refutes them, the evidence that angers and annoys them, and so they forget that just because they haven’t seen an ancient animal alive, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist. They even know that animals which once existed recently, but which they declared extinct, have sometimes been rediscovered, and yet not even that shuts the majority of them up.
How stupid of them, knowing that there are living fossils all over the world, to say, “This millions of years old animal and plant is extinct, because we haven’t seen them, we evolutionists who usually don’t study written historical records, and who often deliberately ignore sightings of living fossils.”
Giant pandas should be allowed to die out as they are stuck in an ‘evolutionary cul-de-sac’, according to BBC presenter Chris Packham.
The conservationist, 48, said the species was not strong enough to survive on its own and it would be better to let nature take its course.
‘Pandas are my frequent whipping boy,’ said Mr Packham, a host of Autumnwatch.
‘Here is a species that, of its own accord, has gone down an evolutionary cul-de-sac. It’s not a strong species.
‘Unfortunately, it’s big and cute and a symbol of the World Wide Fund for Nature and we pour millions of pounds into panda conservation.
I’d bet Chris is an atheist-evolutionists. He has the typical arrogant “Natural things are just simple” stupidity that all atheist-evolutionists share, an attitude that they have because of their hatred for God’s will, his work and their unwillingness to acknowledge that he exists let alone credit him for his work.
And again with the incredible delusional attitude these evolutionists have, in which they think they’ve seen evolution happening, or believing it has happened based on NO EVIDENCE! and with that delusion, then thinking that they even know the future! Chris acts like he’s a prophet who has seen the destiny of pandas, and has decided that they won’t evolve. What a fool! He thinks he knows the future of Earth! On top of that, this stupid arrogant man, who doesn’t believe in the Bible, who knows mankind is very destructive, is persecuting pandas FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO STAND UP TO MAN’S GREED AND BULLYING! “YOU STUPID PANDAS YOU SHOULD DIE BECAUSE YOU WON’T EVOLVE TO STOP US HUMANS!” What a typical God-hating attitude, typical attitude of a cold-hearted bully!: Blame the victim for letting me harm them!
Even more ironic than a conservationist wishing for an amazing, praise-inspiring, rare animal to go extinct, is that pandas are “living fossils”. That means they have not changed at all, or barely, for millions of years (according to evolutionists’ dating methods). In other words they have not evolved at all, let alone into another creature. And creatures like that show macro-evolution/Darwinism to be a false theory. That is probably why Satan is pouting through his pawn Chris, and wanting to kill this living testimony to the DESTRUCTIVE falsehood of macro-evolution, so destructive that it’s adherents want to destroy anything that refutes their faith even when it poses no danger to them. Though some might argue that Chris doesn’t want to destroy pandas, the fact is is that he knows that poachers and toxins threaten this animal’s existence, and he is supposed to be protecting such animals as pandas from these man-made threats.
Believing in macro-evolution over Genesis truly makes you dumb. Using this super moron’s logic, humans should just let their babies die as soon as they are born because babies can’t fend for themselves, and we should let anyone who is disabled to the point of being temporarily useless die too. And children should be taken advantage of and on and on. Macro-evolutionists are truly a hindrance to the well-being of this world.
TIDAL forces parallel to a segment of the San Andreas Fault in central California may be causing non-volcanic tremors that could help predict earthquakes, researchers said.
Low-level tremors have long been associated with volcanoes, because they often warned of impending eruptions.
A study published in the journal Nature said these tremors beneath the San Andreas Fault could provide similar clues about earthquakes.
The researchers say the faint tug of the sun and the moon on the fault causes tremors well below the level where earthquakes occur.
The finding suggests that rock far underground is lubricated with pressurised water, allowing the rock to slip easily and weakening the fault.
This week’s Copenhagen summit was billed as the best, last chance for world leaders to finally rally their citizens to fight man-made global warming. They have failed: The main policy instrument being debated in the Denmark capital — a US$100-billion fund that the developed world will use to bribe the developing world to build windmills and solar panels — is a farce: Poor nations will simply take the money and turn up their air conditioners. After all, if rich nations such as Canada, China and the United States can’t be bothered to reduce their own carbon output, why would we expect the issue to become a priority in Sudan, Costa Rica or India, where per capita incomes are an order of magnitude lower than ours?
But the absurd policy being debated was only part of the problem in Copenhagen. Thanks to speechifying by a who’s who of dubious gurus, self-promoters and self-declared ‘activists” — a staple of international confabs these days — the event progressively took on the hypocrisy and surrealism of a UN Human Rights Council meeting, where the developed world meets to endure sermonizing from the likes of Cuba and Sudan.
Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, who has revoked the licences of 34 radio stations this year and says he may give them to new owners who share his “socialist vision,” lectured the assembled leaders on the evils of capitalism — this, at the same time the developing countries are asking the capitalist West for a 12-digit “climate fund” on top of the usual aid.
Not to be outdone, Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe, an old-style African despot accused in a report last week of using “a brutal orchestrated campaign of rape and torture” to silence opponents, criticized richer countries for not following “the global rule of law.” Mr. Mugabe has no need to worry about Zimbabwe’s rate of emissions, because 30 years of his disastrous rule has devastated the economy and left it incapable of producing even enough food to feed itself.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Senate Democrats cleared the last 60-vote hurdle on U.S. President Barack Obama’s healthcare overhaul on Wednesday, virtually ensuring final passage of its version of the biggest health policy changes in four decades.
For a third straight day, Democrats mustered the 60 party-line votes needed to keep the healthcare bill on track for passage on Thursday over unified Republican opposition.
The vote on final approval, which requires a simple majority in the 100-member Senate, is slated for 7 a.m. EST (1200 GMT) on Christmas Eve on Thursday.
Passage in the Senate would set up potentially tough negotiations in January to iron out differences with the House of Representatives, which approved its own version on November 7. …
It also would require most Americans to have insurance, give subsidies to help some pay for it, and create state-based exchanges where the uninsured can compare and shop for plans. Many of the major provisions would not kick in until 2014.
Passage of the bill is critical for Obama, whose political standing and legislative agenda could hinge on its success. Obama’s public approval ratings have dipped to about 50 percent in many polls as the acrimonious debate dragged on. …
Democrats hope to complete House-Senate negotiations and send the bill to Obama before his State of the Union message in late January, although previous deadlines in the healthcare debate have been missed repeatedly. …
The House-Senate negotiations could be difficult, with clashes looming on a government-run insurance plan, which is in the House bill but not the Senate one, and competing approaches on taxes and the use of federal funds to pay for abortions.
The Climategate Emails describe how a small band of climatologists cooked the books to make the last century seem dangerously warm. The emails also describe how the band plotted to rewrite history as well as science, particularly by eliminating the Medieval Warm Period, a 400 year period that began around 1000 AD. The Climategate Emails reveal something else, too: the enlistment of the most widely read source of information in the world — Wikipedia — in the wholesale rewriting of this history. …
band members turned to their friends in the media and to the blogosphere, creating a website called RealClimate.org. “The idea is that we working climate scientists should have a place where we can mount a rapid response to supposedly ‘bombshell’ papers that are doing the rounds” in aid of “combating dis-information,” one email explained, referring to criticisms of the hockey stick and anything else suggesting that temperatures today were not the hottest in recorded time. One person in the nine-member Realclimate.org team — U.K. scientist and Green Party activist William Connolley — would take on particularly crucial duties.
Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used information source the world has ever known – Wikipedia. Starting in February 2003, just when opposition to the claims of the band members were beginning to gel, Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site. He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling. …
All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity.
More information on The Connolley Conspiracy here.