“Living fossil” shrimp, living for thousands of years in the middle high above dry desert land. Clearly the shrimp, the “living fossil shrimp”, which are sea animals, did not evolve to live in the middle of the desert any more than the Sonoran fish did. Obviously, they were deposited their by the Flood of Noah, by God’s hand and breath. Or is there some evolutionist who would like to argue, “Well hundreds of thousands of years ago the deserts used to be oceans, and I was there too see that as it slowly dried up, only two types of little shrimp and one kind of fish were able to evolve to live in the desert, out of billions of other sea animals, and that’s because, well because of randomness.” Not “Well” at all. Randomness did not do it, and if two oceans dried up and or moved away slowly over hundreds of thousands of years, then obviously, if macro-evolution were true, many more other types and kinds of animals should have evolved to live in desert land. There is no reason why two types of little shrimp and one type of little fish should be the only, or among the very few sea animals, or even fresh water lake animals, to survive in the desert, and not other animals.
On top of that, to think that over hundreds of thousands of years, that no men would destroyed the tiny habitat of these few animals, or storms, is absurd.
Obviously, macro-evolution is a myth, and the reason so few sea animals were able animals were able to survive, is because God gave limited adaptability to the kinds of creatures he made. He didn’t design them to turn into other animals or to be able to magically produce new genetic information or organs or other features from nowhere that would allow them adapt to any non-sudden situation.
The Climategate Emails describe how a small band of climatologists cooked the books to make the last century seem dangerously warm. The emails also describe how the band plotted to rewrite history as well as science, particularly by eliminating the Medieval Warm Period, a 400 year period that began around 1000 AD. The Climategate Emails reveal something else, too: the enlistment of the most widely read source of information in the world — Wikipedia — in the wholesale rewriting of this history. …band members turned to their friends in the media and to the blogosphere, creating a website called RealClimate.org. “The idea is that we working climate scientists should have a place where we can mount a rapid response to supposedly ‘bombshell’ papers that are doing the rounds” in aid of “combating dis-information,” one email explained, referring to criticisms of the hockey stick and anything else suggesting that temperatures today were not the hottest in recorded time. One person in the nine-member Realclimate.org team — U.K. scientist and Green Party activist William Connolley — would take on particularly crucial duties.
Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used information source the world has ever known – Wikipedia. Starting in February 2003, just when opposition to the claims of the band members were beginning to gel, Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site. He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling. …
All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity.
Full article here.
More information on The Connolley Conspiracy here.