Is Alex Jones a Zionist?

Jeff Rense recently became enemies with Alex Jones. Alex was furious over Jeff accusing Alex of being a Zionist, but just now Alex Jones said, “Israel certainly engages in it’s share of bad behavior and crime.” after saying that Israel is made out to be a bogyman.

I don’t think he would say that if he were a Zionist.

In other news about Alex, he just now misdefined eugenics, saying that it had to do with the leaders killing the first born children of their slaves who read too much, as a test of strength. Obviously Alex is ignorant when it comes to religion and Darwinism. Now to get some sleep.

now Alex Jones said, “Israel certainly engages in it’s share of bad behavior and crime.” after saying that Israel is made out to be a bogyman.

I don’t think he would say that if he were a Zionist.

In other news about Alex, he just now misdefined eugenics, saying that it had to do with the leaders killing the first born children of their slaves who read too much, as a test of strength. Obviously Alex is ignorant when it comes to religion and Darwinism. Now to get some sleep.

Damn

Alex Jones believes in macro-evolution it seems, being that he just said a few minutes ago, “That’s your primitive synapses firing” while talking about his elation over him and his friends having victory over the globalists in the global warming debate. Not surprising to me though since he doesn’t get into the macro-evolution vs. Genesis debate, and he avoids trying to offend Catholics and anyone of any religion except ones that he personally perceives as Satanic. Right now, I’m listening to him talk about not dividing over religion; I knew I was right. He says that that is how the “power group” divides and conquers. Now he just said, “I’m not Catholics, I have nothing against Catholics.” and something like, “My family is full of famous Protestants.”

Oh Alex: We are already divided by having no gods, different gods or false Gods. Using your logic we shouldn’t talk about religion or philosophy, but then how would you or anyone else be able to point out an “evil” or “Satanic” religion or philosophy? So close to the truth, yet so far away. So sad.

The Faithless Still Behold God’s Wonders, Yet Refuse to Praise Him

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/12/photogalleries/091211-alien-jellyfish-pictures-arctic/photo6.html

How many amazing designs of living things and beautiful arrangements of stars and nebulas must a faithless person see before he finally acknowledges the existence of God and that he is The Designer of Designers?

When Will the AntiChrist Appear?

It seems to me, that the former President Bush senior and Obama were two living symbols from God, strong clear examples from Him, as to how easily an Anti-Christ could deceive most of the world. Someone more clever than these two, with great beauty and charisma and the political and monetary support, could easily deceive the world. The reason it would be more likely than ever is due to the extreme ignorance of most people, and their wanting to save face after what is most likely going to be a humiliating defeat at Copenhagen. The world will focus its anger against the fundamentalist Christians who most opposed the Global Warmers. The atheists of Russia, China and Vietnam may also join in hypocritically just to crush fundamentalist Christianity and/or because they will think that the fundamentalist Christians were deliberately trying to impoverish these countries via the anti-carbon dioxide treaty of Copenhagen (which they might think because America is thought of as a Christian nation). Fundamentalist Catholics might also be persecuted. According to the Bible, the anti-Christ will also attack the Catholics and not just the true Christians. He may use their opposition against Global Warmers as at least part of his justification for attacking these two groups.

If civil war breaks out in the USA between the libs and the conservs, it’s pretty obvious the libs would lose fast without military and police support. Though libs are violent, in general they lack the intelligence necessary to use it effectively. I doubt the U.S. military would help the libs since libs seem to be opposed to the U.S. military, seeing them as mostly fundamentalist Christians. I suspect the reason that Bush and Obama let the Iraq and Afghanistan wars drag on for so long and with poor management, was to keep the money flowing to their business friends of the military-industrial complex, and to wear down and indirectly murder the U.S. military. This is also evidenced by the harmful vaccines that the troops were forced to take (for example in the Gulf War). With the U.S. military weakened and tired from war, the U.N. troops would have a better chance at subduing them and the conservs. I realized this months ago, except for the the inadequate-amount-of-troops-for-more-money-scheme, which I realized about four days ago.

I think that the libs will wait about five years to shed the humiliation of their global warming  scam while working on finding someone to become a world leader as they wished Obama to be, but who clearly won’t be due to his great failings and endless, annoying “uh”’s.

I think the world may be reluctant however to be quick to embrace in mass another supposed savior after having been badly duped by Obama. But would then would get them to do so? It would have to be another disaster, on a larger scale than 9/11. Earthquakes will be on the rise for sure in the next five years, and with the 2012 scare, will greatly help persuade world into finding another saviour, one who will save them from the imminent end of the world in flames, in their minds, rather than some decades away supposed one degree rise in temperature.

The Stupidity of Liberals Never Ceases to Amaze Me

A famous radio show host named Phil Cunningham a few minutes ago, on air, asked a liberal what Obama has done and the liberal woman said, “May I finish?” Phil repeated himself a little saying, “Talk is cheap,” and then she continued and said, or almost exactly said,  “He’s trying to bring people together to talk. …” Can you figure out the irony of her answer?

And a few days ago Sean/Shawn Hannity interviewed, briefly, two democrat senators. Shawn stupidly said, “We don’t torture” (it just occurred to me plenty of Americans are abusive and historical shows that many Americans in government have tortured and as Shawn himself knows many liberals use psychological torture), and asked this senator a hypothetical question, something like, “If your son had been kidnapped and the police captured captured one of the men who knew where your son was, would you not do everything in your power to get that information out of him?” The senator kept insisting, “I’d do whatever the law allows” and Shawn got mad over his question-dodging, but eventually got him to say something like, “In an extreme case, yes.” though the senator said it with a quiet muddled voice, as if begrudgingly answering. Then he asked what he would do to prevent Amadinejad from nuking Israel. The senator said that we have to talk and blah blah blah blah and when Shawn asked him what he’d say concerning Amadinejad’s Holocaust denying (and had to ask more than once), the senator replied, something almost exactly like, “I’d say to him, ‘Stop it. Stoooop. Stop this talk about the holocaust not having happened.” Like Shawn, I was highly disturbed as such a naive attitude. Shawn told him that Obama was tougher than he was. Next time I talk to my stalkers I’ll just ask them to sit down with me and then , “Stop. Just stoooop. Stop stalking. I’ll give you some donuts if you stop.” I wish I could afford a gun or a sword, because something tells me a kindly donut-offering wouldn’t help.

Still working on the rest of my response to The Joker (Shermer), but more interested in trying to finish one of my books first.

CATO Institute Ignored by Global Warmers Since 1992!

http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html

More Global Warming Consensus myth busters:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=70005

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGquwwoQfVY

And to the idiotic Arminians, Neopagans, and Atheists (“Believers” I call them):

A majority of people believing that a thing is true doesn’t make that thing true.

That isn’t science and never will be.

Global Warming Ate My Homework

Today in class, I had the perfect excuse for why I didn’t have a minimum ten page proof of Global Warming. I said to the teacher:

“Teacher, the Earth is getting really hot. In fact hundreds of years from now my Florida beach front property will be under water and millions of people on the beach will be screaming dying because they couldn’t take a hint when they saw that while they were walking around and lying down, all the sand was under water, and so in their arrogantnessness, will just lie down and gurgle gurgle die. Now it takes oxygen to write stuff, and trees and power to cut trees to write the stuff on that you wanted me to write stuff on, etc. And that causes carbon dioxide poisoning. In fact I’m poisoning you all right now, and you’re killing me with your breath too. So, I’m deciding I’m not going to be a killer anymore, and be a good Liberal and just walk outa this classroom and save you all from an agonizing heat stroke.”

I heard giggling all throughout the classroom and the teacher starred at me, as if not knowing what to say. Suddenly the teacher picked up some textbooks off her desk and threw them down. “I’m sorry I said,” as I saw her face nearly become pure evil. She then began stomping on the textbooks repeatedly and everyone looked afraid. “Damn these tree-killers!” she shouted. Then she said, “You’re right! Damnit carbon dioxide damnit trees just damn everything to Hell we’re all gonna die because of Christians! They even kill pine trees for Christmas and act like the trees have no feelings! Oh the hypocrisy!”

“Yes teacher, yes!” I replied with great joy and Liberal giddiness. Can we go now? Look: even the desks are made of trees!” I starred at her with my hands in front of me held together, big open eyes and my mouth hanging open, eagerly awaiting her answer.

“Class dismissed!” she shouted.

Suddenly the whole class erupted in joy and we all hugged each other and we quickly left the classroom. But before I left I told her to recycle the book she had just stamped on. “Oh you’re right, I’ll do that,” she replied. Then we hugged each other and I left. Gullible.

Icebergs Away!

A giant iceberg is headed for Australia! So much for global warming lol! Resolved the contradiction I thought I found in the Bible; it never existed. Still working on my previous post, but a messed up mouse and my attempt to finish a 2-year-old book is delaying that.

Update: Some fool emailed me in ignorance claiming that it was Alaska that was going to be destroyed by a monster iceberg (um no if you hadn’t noticed it says “Australia”, you also coulda clicked the link to the article. And how hard was it to notice “australia” in my article’s tag list? Might wanna see a Christian psychiatrist for that vision and anti-link-clicking problem of yours). He also cast the, “God did it” and “you don’t reason [therefore]” stereotype at me (last time I checked throwing baby insults didn’t change any scientist’s or Calvinist’s mind). Apparently super moron didn’t bother reading the rest of my entries or visiting any of the links at the sides of my journal or reading any books, but merely parroting what merely sounded right to him, thinking it would get him a permanent place as God in Heaven. Whatever you say Mr. Randomness Made A Giant Explosion Billions of Years Ago and Spontaneously Created Self-Aware Emotional Reasoning Life That Repeatedly Turned Into Other Fully Functional Animals Till It Became A Fully Functional Animal Man Via Gas That Turned Into A Star and Floating Rock From Nowhere That Slowly Over Billions of Years Became a Planet With Magic Soup Puddles. So what was that about me and other Christians not being able to reason? Your magic imaginary Disorderly Random Chaos god who enjoys puppeting you is no match for God. This 4-year-ear-old also thinks that merely mentioning, “fossils” and “carbon dating” makes him right.  Mr. 4-year-old: learn to read and use a search engine and to remove your bias-blinders, and you might wanna read the rest of my journal entries before babbling like you were the Christopher Columbus of weather findings and science. As I’ve pointed out for over a year now, merely saying, “fossils”  or “carbon dating” isn’t an argument, but apparently you’re too busy reading some child’s book from 1943 over and over to catch up with modern science or to learn anything new.

This ricky123 fool also thinks that saying “global warming did it” makes him right. No idiot: science isn’t “global warming did it because I feel so”. Once again you’ve shown what hypocrite accusers atheists and Liberals are. When will your magic-believing group accept that just because something seems to be true doesn’t mean it is? Hint hint: notice the article I linked to first doesn’t say a thing about the ice shelf having cracked because of warm air? Hint, hint, hint? Hint? Hello? Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiint. Does that little climatology science lesson soothe your global warming fears (and like you really care about the life of anyone who disagrees with your paranoia let alone those decades from now Mr. Believe Me or Die by Global Warming). What will you care stupid atheist, if your dead, just like the mentally ill Skeptic Shermer said? DUH? Why do you forget your own anti-Christian, anti-Bible, anti-religion “philosophical” ranting? Like the Bible itself says, if there is no resurrection, go have fun, stop worrying! Worrying will kill you much sooner that your prophecied death of beach front property by global warming.

So did you delete your email after realizing you were no match for my ability to reason, logically? What were you afraid of that you dared not receive a reply from me? And yes ricky123 the Liberal: I am sick of liberals and their made up science. Use a dictionary next time: you may be surprised that fossils doesn’t mean, “Liberals are right and Christians are wrong” or that carbon dating means, “Insert arbitrary age here.” But hey: what does it matter since you don’t care about the truth, but just showing off for attention and sexual gratification?

Update 2: The anonymous cowardly liberal has informed that he deleted his email because,

I am getting ready to commit suicide after realizing I’ve indirectly been murdering millions of unborn babies, kids, and adults by starving them via my stupid “save the ozone layer, whales, and icebergs via making more oil out of corn” scheme. I’ve forced the poor and needy to rely on technology that they can’t even buy to rely on, like my failed Magic Save The Ozone Layer As Seen On Tv Gas which my Random Disorganized Liberal Church of Greed was selling at too high a price and which actually turned out (according to our Liberal Book of Holy Random Science) to be destroying the ozone layer even more on top of all that! Hopefully by killing myself I’ll save a whale which will one day, billions and billions of years from now, turn into a whale-man which will be humbler and more tree-hugging than I could ever hope to be. Or maybe Dolphin Men and Octopi Men will rule the world day and kill us horrible humans all off! Or maybe viruses will evolve into little Virus Men and do it! Hopefully my suicide will encourage all other humans to kill themselves. Oh but let’s release all the animals from the horrible dungeon-prisons first (I think they are called zoos?) and from those experiment places with like tortured mice and pigs inside etc. Okay, I’m talking waaaay too much obviously and that’s causing too much deadly carbon dioxide to be produced. Eh, eh… eeeeuhhh, all the cabon dioxide I just breathed out, eeeeh, I’m dying from it! *Dies*

Yet another atheist dies by psychosomatic paranoid delusion. *Shakes head*.

Lesson: “reason” is not mere insults, stereotypes, refusing to accept that you cannot know everything (let alone may never know how God created the first things in detail) or ignoring what Christians say, just because you hate to accept that God exists, is always right, and that Christians are morally superior to non-Christians. “Reason” is not insulting someone for not believing whatever you say and for telling the truth. “Reason” isn’t lying for money, fame, pleasure, or revenge. “Reason” is accepting the truth and living by it.

Note: If you delete the email account that you used to send a buffoon-attack, don’t expect me to post it.

Skeptic ‘Dr.’ Michael Shermer Speaks On Coast to Coast A.M.

I listened to Michael Shermer as soon as he was on Coast to Coast AM tonight and almost immediately he made a mistake, saying, “Scientists are just naturally skeptical.” That’s false because scientists are human like everyone else and there are different types of science, some with very different degrees of credibility. Further, not all scientists have the same education and training (or “brainwashing”), so even if they are taught a scientific method like this one. To say that a scientist will naturally become skeptical or will become more logical, which is what skeptics and their panderers equate with being logical or more logical, is as deeply stupid as saying that U.S. senators,  lawyers and police officers will become or become more so, good and logical because they take an oath to uphold the Constitution. On top of that, at least mainstream scientists are not made to swear an oath to uphold any scientific method, at least it’s not a common practice. On top of that, the scientific method does not say at the end to come to a truthful conclusion nor does it say how to draw a correct conclusion let alone how to analyze the results of the tests NOR HOW TO CARRY OUT CORRECT/GOOD/RELEVANT tests! It simply says, “draw a conclusion”. And some might argue that “draw a conclusion” is an illogical step since a mere two or more tests will not always give you results to believe one thing or the other.

At about 11 P.M., George Noory asked him, “Do you take anything at faith?” and Shermer replied, “probably most of my emotional life” and implied that his emotional life only had to do with his relationships with those he loved or was hoping to have a loving relationship with, which is not logical, since an emotional life is your entire life. A person’s entire life comes with emotions and your interaction with other people or animals. And if Shermer says that he takes things on faith with those he loves or hopes to love, why would he be anymore logical with his other interpersonal reactions? If he’s biased when it comes to those he loves, his liberal and/or macro-evolution and/or Big Bang-believing friends, how can he be a logical person overall? If he can’t be logical when it comes to those he loves, how much more will he be illogical with those he has little to no concern for, and hates?

When George asked him if he believed in, or rather why he didn’t believe in out-of-body occurrences, Shermer said that he didn’t believe because (among a few other reasons), that he didn’t know what the method would be for transferring his memories. But why does he conclude that the memories of a person is in their brain? Further, why would not knowing how everything works mean it shouldn’t be believed, and that last argument is one which which Darwinists, Big Bang-believers and Global Warmers love and often use against Christians, as if Christians are the illogical ones.

Shermer also said that he didn’t believe there was enough evidence to know what the effects of (slight) global warming would be. So much for a scientific consensus that Global Warming is going to be a bad thing, even if that had been true, Shermer’s statement, because of his high standing among mainstream scientists and his popular Skeptics magazine, will heavily influence them to follow his lead. On top of that, the truth is not determined by majority vote, let alone a universal agreement.  This is known in many places, including on Wikipedia, where especially the administrators there will admit that the truth is not determined by consensus, but deny this and contradict themselves with their actions by their one-on-one-bullying or ganging up on anyone who opposes their beliefs, and verbally contradicting themselves by saying or implying that only the “mainstream scientists / the majority of scientists should be believed or are the credible or most credible scientists.

No doubt to me, even if Christians became the majority of scientists, these Wickedpedians would simply claim that whether Christians can be scientists or not is debatable in  order to throw the truth into doubt.

When George asked him if the universe and us were created by a roll of the dice, Shermer replied, “No, if it was just a roll of the device we certainly would not be here… evolution is not random… but random variations” do occur. So Shermer admits that it took organized, precise for the universe and the first living thing to have their existence and design. Shermer also said, “You disagree with Huxley at your own peril.” and that Huxley had said that you can’t know if God exists by using science. And why is that Shermer, did you use the scientific method to find that out?

Shermer said that he had once been an evangelical Christian, but not a Calvinist. It’s known by many millions, that evangelicals, which are usually associated with the crazy charismatics and often crazy Pentecostals,  have a high rate of losing faith or reverting back to their old way of thinking and life, unlike Calvinists. So, it’s no surprise to me or them that Michael lost his faith.

When George asked him about prayer, he also said, “Why does he need anyone to remind of who needs help; he doesn’t.” The Bible also says that God knows what you want before you Jealousy is a human emotion. The problem with evil is an insurmountable one to unbelievers

Michael also said that it was ridiculous that any alien would give us a five year advance in technology because, “Any alien [that can get to Earth?] would be able to create [life] so how is that any different than what we know as God [and God doesn't help anyone if he exists].” Says who Michael? You said you had no evidence that God didn’t or did exist, so how would you know if he’s helping anyone or not, and why if someone were much more advanced than us, would they not want to help us at all unless it were to give us a massive boost in technology or technologies? Using Michael’s logic, aliens and God should make all of us humans into Supermen even though Michael often claims in various ways that the majority of the world is stupid, weird, unscientific and destructive.

This is a stupid man, one of those typical stupid narcissists who claims everyone else is stupid, who because of their ignorance and hatred of God’ law, and impatience, fall for some narcissist giving them clever-sounding  live-life-how-you-feel-like-not-God-justifications, “Do you really think God, a supreme being, would feel jealously?” from another narcissist. Yet they think they are wiser because they use big words and make clever analogies and metaphors, and/or in eloquent or confident-sounding ways (though very rarely original ways, and they often make a fuss over Christians not being original), and because they aren’t afraid of Hell or death. But what’s their feelings have to do with them being right? How does not being afraid of something make them right? How does confidence or doubting/skepticism make them right? How does feeling superior make them right? How does using “big words” or being eloquent make them right? Such behavior are all signs of a narcissist who has nothing to back up his claims, even running away from the truth, always AFRAID of having to live in fear.

Shermer, in denying that 9/11 was an “inside job” replied, “Clinton couldn’t even pull off a blow job in the white house… [without being found out, how is the government going to pull off a conspiracy] “for months on end without anyone noticing?” Shermer, conspiracies are pulled off all the time without anyone noticed for months on end, or do you not know the obvious. Apparently no amount of being Big Banged on your head with the Bernie Madehoff stories made any impression on your very aware self. Oh, I know, you were skeptical of that Bernie or anyone could get away with robbing people for years, let alone months. So according to Shermer, there are no secrets that can be held long for a month before the public knowing about them. So everyone knows every business, engineering, miltary, and scammer secret. We all know every single military device in existence, we all know every technology being researched and developed and which people in what city in what building.  And what is your scientific evidence for these teachings Shermer? Oh wait, people only find out about conspiracies in a few weeks, not other types of secret collaborations, because, uh, cuz Shermer feels and said so! He’s God!

Shermer also said that God wouldn’t feel jealousy because, “jealousy is such a human emotion” Says who Shermer? Why if we were made in God’s image would it only be an emotion that humans would feel? So no alien even would feel jealousy, no animal? Why would jealousy only be something humans would feel? He also said that Greek god’s were portrayed as jealous, but how is that evidence that God wouldn’t feel jealousy of any kind for any reason? If humans are constantly attributing jealousy to divine beings, how is that evidence AGAINST divine beings feeling jealousy? How about, Michael, it being evidence FOR divine beings feeling jealousy if humans INSTINCTIVELY attribute divine beings to having feelings like us? And what Michael, would be those “not such human emotions” that God WOULD feel in your biased opinion? Did you perform some secret science experiment that told you what were “not such human emotions that God would feel” and decide to hide your magic results from us? And yet you write a book called, “Why People Believe Weird Things”? Arrogant, blind, hypocritical, bigoted. Truly the ones who speak “mumbo jumbo” are anti-Christians.

Shermer also said that a universe with a jealous God is no different than saying that “stuff just happens.” This is the same Dr. Michael Shermer who said just a few minutes earlier, said that the universe and everything in with a design [not created by humans or aliens], appeared by ordering, right after that mutations were “random”/”just happen”. Why and how would the creation of the universe and the first living things in it be created in a specific knowable way, yet not “natural selection”? And since when are mutations not predictable in any way, or random just because we can’t know every process involved in causing a mutation?

Yet another blind guide.

To The Lithuanian Neopagan Giedrius

You contradict yourself concerning Christianity:

You said on your anti-Catholic page that Catholics are the ones who were violent, and even persecuted the protestants, and that the protestants FLED and didn’t fight, yet you have an anti-Christianity page that simply says all Christians were evil. That makes no sense, you said that PROTESTANTS FLED, not FOUGHT. Also protestants didn’t exist till the 1600’s, and as you know and history shows, they were almost 100% non-violent, with some rare exceptions.

Also, Christianity didn’t simply spread because of Catholic violence, BUT BECAUSE OF THE JEWS AND JESUS! You act like Jesus went around murdering people by not mentioning him, how blasphemous and stupid of you. And after Jesus the apostles PEACEFULLY spread Christianity.

The pagans of ancient Rome persecuted and murdered about 6,000,000 Christians and tortured them to death, INCLUDING THE CHILDREN. And you dare say Christians are all the evil ones? Look how stupid your religion has made you! Hugging oak trees and believing whatever you feel is true doesn’t make you wise, BELIEVING AND HEEDING THE TRUTH DOES!

FURTHER: The book of Revelation warned that the Catholic church would pollute the world with sin and would be a great murderer of the true Christians, it is called the whore that rides the beast.

Now what is your excuse for continuing to be so ignorant?

God bless you with his forgiveness and eternal life.