Archive for the ‘creationists’ Category

New Ceres Data Defies Big Bang and Evolution Theories, Supports Genesis Creationism

Source: New Ceres Data Defies 4.5 Billion Years


Michio Kaku: The Blind Physicist Who Elected Himself Spokesperson for All Scientists

May 16, 2009 2 comments

“when you ask where physical law comes from, then you run into big problems” – Michio Kaku, December 18, 2002

“when someone asks us where string theory came from, at that point we just throw up our hands, we don’t know” – Michio Kaku, December 18, 2002

You don’t speak for all scientists Mich, and it was hateful for you to claim that creation scientist Christians say that they don’t know where the physical laws of the universe came from. Disorder doesn’t lead to order, and as you yourself said, on December 18, 2002, the chance of life coming about on its own is near to zero, which is a lie, since life can only come about from order, not disorder, so it is not near to zero, it is zero.

Update 4/15/2011:

Other Information on Michio’s Character

I found more info about Michio’s character some days ago, but because my laptop doesn’t have enough memory to handle what I do to it, I’ve delayed posting this info for a long while. But this is what I found on Mainstream Scientist Peter Woit’s blog:

A commenter points out that on [Michio’s] MySpace site [Michio] has posted a copy of a forthcoming article by him that is supposed to appear in New Scientist. It is about the controversy over string theory, but doesn’t at all deal with the criticisms of the theory contained in my book and Smolin’s. It does contain a thoroughly dishonest paragraph about me, misrepresenting my position at Columbia (Kaku is well aware than I am a faculty member and teach graduate courses here, as well as administering the department computer system), and describing me as a “former particle physicist” (he’s well aware I have recently written a book on the subject of particle physics and continue to conduct research on the subject; then again, many people consider him to be a “former particle physicist”). He ascribes my criticism of string theory to jealousy over having been turned down for tenured positions at prestigious universities in favor of string theorists, and misquotes something I wrote about string theory:

String theory has only a “poetic relationship” to reality.

I never have said or written anything like this.

More here

Related article: What Does Michio Kaku Believe?

More Historical Facts Atheists Avoid Like the Plague

February 17, 2008 Leave a comment
Categories: creationists, darwin, evolution

I Wonder If the Atheist Evolutionists Will Allow This Relevant Info

January 25, 2008 Leave a comment

I decided to add some important information to the wikipedia pages on evolutionist “Eiseley” and “Origin of the Species” concerning Darwin’s credit thievery. I wonder if they’ve buried it already.

Wikipedia Still Dominated By Hypcoritical Snakeoil Scientists

January 23, 2008 Leave a comment

I posted this rebuke on the discussion page on Venus of Wikipedia:

Unscientific Hypocritical Propaganda


“Venus is thought to undergo periodic episodes of plate tectonics, in which the crust is subducted rapidly within a few million years, separated by periods of a few hundred million years of relative stability. This contrasts strongly with Earth’s more or less steady state of ongoing subduction and continental drift, but is consistent with how geological processes operate without oceans, since oceans are believed to act as a lubricant in subduction. It is believed the surface rocks of Venus are only about a half-a-billion years old as impact crater analysis suggests that its surface dynamics have exchanged its surface for a clean face (wiping out old craters) sometime in the last billion years.”

Where is the citation for even one of these statements? Where even a “citation needed”? Why hypocrites you evolutionists and panspermians are. It is also false as there are many scientists who believe it is about 6000 years old. SINCE WHEN IS EVIDENCELESS SPECULATION, “just trust me” “cuz I said so” objective fact? Is this the same as what so many anti-christians on wikipedia call weasel wording? It should be. It is weaseling in anti-biblical propaganda in the guise of science.

So this is what the wikipedia “community” (anti-christian propagandists) considers one of the best examples of their Wickedpedia work? They are right, it is one of the best examples of their subtle sneaking in of lies without immediately looking like hypocrites to the masses of gullible and deluded. I think you all should watch Tainted Evidence – Forensics On Trial and Forensics on Fire to get another dose of reality. Mere pretension does not make something scientific.


Evolutionists Approve of Rape, Child Molestion, Thievery and Lying

January 19, 2008 Leave a comment

What has happened when not just your typical ignorant evolutionists, but the most well educated ones do not accept these most basic and obvious and facts, even scientifically evident: that the universe is designed and all the things in it?

What happens when people think mere rhetorical questions, sarcasm, mockery, insults, their skepticism, disbelief or belief or the strength of their belief = evidence?

What happens when people forget the most basic meanings of common and essential words and concepts such as truth, lie, evidence, proof, love, mercy, justice, law, good, evil, material, spiritual, and God?

What happens when Darwin-worshipers, anti-creationists, and moral, scientific, and historical ignoramuses pretend that everyone is his own god? You get a nutty rape-infested liar’s paradise:

Stupidity, bias, and complacency leads to destruction, not evolution. The fittest won’t just survive, but will live forever in peace and joy.

Yet Another Atheist Pretending to Be a Scientist Exposed

January 9, 2008 Leave a comment

On amazon you can find a false review by IslandMoonWatcher (because the amazon moderators are anti-christian bigots who refuse to be fair to Christian authors and film-makers unless maybe you complain). Here my refutation:

“More idiotic drivel from the creationist camp.”

Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.

“It actually deserves zero stars. Even your own evangelists like Chuck Colson, Phillip E. Johnson and Hugh Ross agree on a “Big Bang”, ie; God waved his magic wand about 14.7 billion years ago (or 6,600 years ago….whatever) and “POOF”,”

Cuz u said so, and whatever the false scientist says who provides no evidence says is true, is true.

“the universe and everything else was magically created out of pixie dust–fully aged of course,”

Who said it was created by pixie dust you slandering hypocrite? Slandering hypocrite where did the big bang come from? Ooops? Blind and bigoted much? Second, contradictory hypocrite, who said it appeared fully aged? Just because something as an appearance of age to you = it’s therefore aged? You can that science you ranting, slandering, hypocrite? Hypocrite, if it was created new, then the AGE is not AGED you hypocrite, big duh. Also hypocrite it’s already been shown that a new geological feature can have the appearance of being aged, see Tuluman Island you arguer from ignorance.

“like a good cheese.”

God has problems making good cheese? Are you stupid? Why would it be hard for God to make good cheese if he can make a universe? Can you make any sense you babbler?

“PLEASE get a life”

Say what about eating your words?

“and leave science to scientists, not fairy-tale mythicists.”

Cuz the non-scientist said so, and whatever the non-scientist says is true is true.

“Maybe I’ll write a convincing-sounding fairy tale story about Noah and the Flood so I can sell books to the choir and steal a few thousand dollars too! “

So stereotypes = the truth? Hypocrite? So over 40 million Presbyterians and Baptists including their pastors and elders donating their hard earned money, not out of their riches and risking their lives to save others in third world countries and gang plagued areas, not thanks your evil silly Darwin god’s racist preaching and you who parrot it like you’ve done here, are stealing and greedy? Thanks for the deep reasonless hatred that is the heart of a atheist myth-loving evolutionist.

Note: Notice you can’t tell what IslandMoonWatcher has “reviewed”? So this is atheist “science” for you: ranting stupidity and falsely accusing others of the very evil the love.