Posts Tagged ‘global warming’

Saving The Oceans by Reclaiming Spilled Fuel and Annhilating the ‘Great Island of Trash’

August 12, 2019 Leave a comment

For a very long time, about twenty five years I have on and off studied alternative physics, energy, propulsion and all kinds of other things. Because my brain cannot process math correctly at a normal rate or well compared to most people (I have dyscalculia, numerical dyslexia) I must rely on other logical methods of deduction to determine if what I’m reading or not is true, including identifying biased statements, empty claims/baseless statements and accepted claims. It’s no different then how one would judge if some car was good or not. I was as are many fascinated by claims of “free energy” and “antigravity” and alternative theories to Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, aether/ether theories, what photons and electrons might truly be and how gravity and magnetism truly work. Eventually I did discover some miraculous-like technology which had been mostly overlooked for the wrong reasons. Many people including their inventors made bad judgments and due to a lack of good, helpful friends and promotion and a lack of money did not get far. Their inventions either were mostly forgotten or have remained in extreme obscurity. It’s also due to the “media”/news reporters going with more sensational stories day after day and relentless competition and many being overloaded with work, tending to their family, friends or pets, or their health, or distracted with addictions and lusts, that these revolutionary concepts and inventions ended up in perpetual obscurity.

Consider the Antikythera Device which is said to be 1000-2000 years ahead of its time. For the usual reasons in life, including thefts, jealousies, “idea theft” aka “intellectual property theft”, business sabotage, wars, false religions, bad government, diseases, and on and on, the inventors and this combination of inventions never evolved into anything more till it was rediscovered, and by that time there was nothing useful to be learned by it, it had literally become outdated. It did however further make clear that atheism-based (anthropological, archaeological and evolutionary) science (so called “mainstream science) was completely wrong regarding how mankind came about. Like the Piri Reis Map it was irrifutable evidence that evolutionist and Big Bang timelines did not (and cannot) match the technological development rate of mankind. They do not sync up in otherwords with the “stupid cave men/monkeys dragging females by their hair” and only becoming intelligent when Galileo claimed Earth wasn’t at the center of the universe and Darwin claiming we came from animals or when in 1924, Russian biochemist Alexander Oparin theorized that living things came from chemical reactions of dead things. No, some of the oldest Egyptian pyramids were built around 2630 B.C., and Biblical literature, the Book of Genesis, was written more than 3,200 years ago, the famous Mitchell Hodges skull perhaps created in Idar Oberstein, Germany around 1800, using lapidary technology that was invented in at least the early 1400s, the microscope and telescope were invented from 1590-1650, Minoan’s were at least 1,400 years more technologically advanced than the Romans and the Romans had surgical technology equal to 18th and 19th century technology (1,800 years more advanced than the rest of the world. There are other engineering feats of extreme yet unknown age, 1000s of years old, feats showing the ability to carve, move and build with stone blocks weighing 140 tons to one kiloton. At Göbekli Tepe, one of tbe first stone built cities or worship sites to be built after Noah’s Flood (or perhaps soon after the construction of the Tower of Babel was stopped), already showed mankind was moving 50 ton blocks of stone. In ancient Egypt and India there was also advanced drilling technology and super advanced stone-cutting technology, anywhere from 4000 to 700 years more advanced than modern drilling and cutting technology and techniques, which only until these years may finally have been understood. The most famous lost ancient technology is Damascus Steel, there is even a lost ancient Chinese sword-making method that was copied by the Japanese and a Japanese man recently recreated this same or similar lost art. There were also super strong knives made in modern times, but the inventor died without letting anyone know how he made them, I cannot remember his name and Google disappointingly does not mention him anymore when doing a search for “world’s hardest knives” or “toughest” or “strongest” even with “antiques”. The inventor then has quickly disappeared from public knowledge and only very knowledgeable knife collectors would then know his name. So, consider the 100% reality that mankind creates advance technologies, ignores, overlooks or even destroys them out of incompitence, jealousy, pride, competition/greed and ignorance.

Now after pointing this out want to tell everyone that I discovered of a combination of cheap technologies that would completely eliminate pollution from gas and diesel engines and even the super-polluting smog caused by combusting “bunker fuel” (sulphur-heavy fuel) burned by mass cargo ocean transport ships/mass cargo vessels. To make and implement them is much cheaper and much more effective then hydrogen engines, catalytic converters and scrubbers. This combination of technologies could also use methane converted to liquid gas. What’s most astonishing is that the world’s oceans could be cleaned up of all the toxic fuel and chemicals being spilled into and leaking into the rivers and oceans of the world, rapidly, without having to filter out the water. For example the polluted Ganges River and shores of Nigeria, especially at Bodo could quickly be cleaned and the siphoned pollution used as fuel and “burned up” without any toxic emissions. Total fuel costs for all petrol-burning vehicles, trucks, ships and turbo-prop planes could be reduced by 30-80%, in my opinion, possibly 95%.

Being that I must make a living as much as anyone else, am selling what I know, and so I may go into business by manufacturing and using these technologies myself. My knowledge will not come cheap, as for each person who wishes to know must pay a $475,500 down payment, and they must sign a non-disclosure contract. I advise anyone who wishes to use what I know to secure manufacturing contracts for the tech I will disclose to you. Once I have obtained approximately $100 million in purchases will attempt to develop and manufacture the necessary technologies myself. To ignore what I know will be a disgrace to the world. My offer is very cheap for saving the world’s rivers, oceana, ground water, human and animal life. I am especially concerned for the Ganges River dolphin and the food they rely on, they are almost extinct and the Nigerians of Bodo who are living on small contaminated snails and polluted fish and living on land polluted with crude oil.

Most Americans I imagine will think, “Who cares about Nigeria and some dolphins and pathetic India’s dirty creek? What about making profitable jobs for Americans?” To such a complaint, consider the Taylor Oil Spill Disaster which could last for hundreds of years if not stopped.  Under my business plan I would continually suck up the polluted sea water to be reused as fuel without the need for seperating the petrol from the water. It would be resold cheaper than sulphur laden oil which is the lowest grade of bulk fuel used by marine shipping companies cargo container ships.

HHO Fuel-Saving Device 1 -

HHO Fuel-Saving Device 1 –

I also intend to create a business of ever expanding trash collecting ships which will float over and by floating the Great Pacific Garbage Patch and atomize it, as in safely and efficiently reducing it to tiny harmless particles. It will be sustainable from the waste oil collected from spill sites and the toxic chemicals siphoned from the Ganges River. The process by which the trash is atomized (destroyed) will also greatly reduce any radioactive waste. Now that truly will help the world. Who wants radioactive waste washing up at the beech? I also suspect one of the technologies I discovered will make using shale oil less dangerous and costly.

If you would like to donate to me or purchase information regarding the obscure technologies I’ve discovered, donate or pay to my paypal email.

If you want to promote yourself of business by donating, donate at least $50 directly to my bank acount and I will link to you on the bottom of this article. And so the world knows, those donating to me does not mean they believe everything or I do, so don’t accuse my donors of supporting evil, hate or lies, listen to your own wordly advice: don’t be negative, don’t judge, be loving. Or, as Jesus said (who is God according to John chapter 1), “As you want done to you, so do others.” Isn’t that the most valuable advice of all time?

Wikipedia Popular Pages Stats Prove That Most Americans and Brits Are Stupid. And What Beggar Jimmy Wales and His Army Want Your $5 For

January 5, 2012 Leave a comment

(The Essjay Scandal and It’s Effect On Wikipedia’s Donations for the Months Ahead)

Wikipedia is a propaganda tool for anti-Christians and narcissists who want to somehow prove that they are superior to those around them and to feed their craving for attention, but without risking their public reputation by being exposed as cyberbullies and retaliation against them for it (hence why they hide their identities). The goal of Wikipedia is also to subtly fool people into thinking that Wikipedia is trustworthy and that the Bible is only partially reliable and ultimately that since there is no God to answer to or who can hurt or reward anyone, that whoever has the control (which wouldn’t be God) makes right, as a narcissist might say.

So what does Jimmy Wales and his army of gullibles want our money for, or as Jimmy puts it currently, our $5 for? They seem to fancy that ht money is meant to enlighten you about anything and everything you want to know about, but it’s not that simple. First, the obvious: Wikipedia is an excellent propaganda tool. The information on it can be found elsewhere, and it puts it together on one page. So what. Second, the money doesn’t just go to bandwidth in general, it’s used up mostly on stupid pages (see list of stupid waste of bandwidth pages below). Guess why? Because most of the world is stupid. I’m sure the idea is to get people to think, “Wow Wikipedia got this right, wow it let me know all these cool facts really fast about Michael Jackson and din’t make fun of him, my hero, at all” so that when Wikipedia says that evolution is true and creationism false, the same idiot will think, “Well they got MJ’s profile right, so they must be trustworthy with everything else,” in the hopes that such morons will influence others to be the same way till there are no Christians left, just stupid and easy-to-manipulate people who won’t make them (the Wikipedia know-it-alls) feel bad for being the immoral, self-centered, lying, hypocrite, manipulators that they are. So, what those donations are mostly covering are pages that don’t further civilization/advancement in living longer, happier, with an improved knowledge of the most helpful truths for those things, but instead, destroy it. Here’s the top 100 most popular pages on Wikipedia for 2009, with my comments written after the number of people given who viewed the page for the year).

1. Wiki (131,383 page hits per day) = 47,954,795 total views for the year. So, Jimmy Wales wants Christians, all theists, and all atheist to pay $5 to teach people that he invented Wikipedia (false)? Cuz that’s the claim where “Wiki” ends up leading visitors to.

2. The Beatles (111,896) = 40,842,040 million hits a year. Jimmy Wales wants Christians, all theists, to pay $5 so the world can learn about the Beatles? No Jimmy atheist, no.

3. Michael Jackson (79,734) = 29,102,910. Jimmy Wales wants Christians, all theists, to pay $5 so the world can learn about Homosexual Pedophile-inclined singer with multiple bad nose jobs even in the controversy section, which Jimmy whitewashes out of the MJ article? Because? Is Wikipedia for celebrity promoting and advertising Jimmy? No Jimmy Atheist Wales, you’re not getting my money.

4. Favicon.ico (78,077) = 28,498,105. No Jimmy, won’t be donating so that you can have more bandwidth to teach people about favicon.ico.

5. YouTube (72,318) = 28,498,105. No I won’t donate $5 so you can learn about Youtube, just go to Youtube and learn from Youtube itself.

6. Wikipedia (52,542) = 19,177,830. No I’m not donating $5 so you can learn about Wikipedia or learn a new random fact from it’s homepage.

7. Barack Obama (49,401). Liberal fodder. No five.

8. Deaths in 2009 (48,758). Lovely what attracts the non-Christian and false Christian world. Not “Breakthroughs of 2009” not “Greatest achievements of 2009” or just all time world-benefiting breakthroughs or achievements, not even for the decade, no, it’s “deaths for this year.” And the anti-Christian world says Christians are morbid and full of hate? Backwards, evil, blind, negative idiots. You’re not inspiring at all anti-Christians, you’re depressing and morbid with an unhealthy interest in pain, fighting and death.

9. United States (46,545). You can only learn about the US from Wikipedia? Nope, far from it. There’s city-data, the CIA, and many other sites.

10. Facebook (42,679). Try watching Social Networking first.

11. Current events portal [] (40,962). An encyclopedia of current events? Uh… what happened to CNN, Fox, ABC, NBC, Reuters, Bloomberg, Asianews, CNBC, and using the many years old RSS feed button? No five dollars.

12. World War II (29,736). But you won’t be learning that Hitler was a narcissist who endorsed atheism. No five for you.

13. Twitter (28,511). Boring. No five.

14. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (28,395). Of course anti-social nerds with no life and little kids are attracted to Wikipedia: it talks about anything and everything except actually giving all the facts against evolutionism, big bangism, and the Jimmy Wales Wikipedia cult.

15. Slumdog Millionaire (26,755). That’s an important topic to use up thousands of dollars of bandwidth for isn’t it? No. No five let alone five million.

16. Lil Wayne (26,210). But not Jesus. No five.

17. Adolf Hitler (25,481). No five unless you’re going to point out Hitler had narcissism disorder and endorsed the atheist Nietzsche’s books (and in stop lying about Christians, Christian history and the Bible).

18. India (25,380). Like the USA, you can learn about India from plenty of other sources than the untrustworthy Wikipedia. I know that Indians are one of the main drivers of the traffic to that page. It’s also one of the most popular because India has one of the world’s largest populations.

19. Transformers 2 (24,842). Fail again.

20. Scrubs (TV series) (24,758). And again.

21. Sex (24,754). Nope: can’t learn about sex elsewhere: you need Jimmy Wales to explain it to you. And like a hodgepodge fest of narcissist atheist nerds have any business teaching anyone about sex? Eeek.

22. Rhianna (24,670). Wow, no. I wonder why Jenna Jameson isn’t in the top 100. Says a lot that no matter how much you whore yourself and no matter how beautiful you still won’t make the top 100 in Wikipedia.

23. United Kingdom (24,300). Same as USA and India: look elsewhere.

24. Abraham Lincoln (23,743). Hmmm, let me guess if there would be an atheist spin on Abraham Lincoln. I wonder why American Civil War and the American Revolution aren’t in the top 100. I know those are standard public school topics. Maybe liberals have marginalized them for fear of being accused of spreading Christian teachings.

25. Heroes (TV series) (23,569). No I won’t donate to Wikipedia.

26. Watchmen (film) (23,544). No Jimmy Silly Wales, I can always go to IMDB.

27. Lady GaGa (23,376). No I won’t give $5 so you can learn extensive information about the idiot narcissist who wears meat on her head and thinks the most important thing in life is looking like a rich crazy. Anyone know what a dandy is?

28. Star Trek (film) (22,990). Atheist Trek.

29. 2009 Swine Flu outbreak (22,968). I really wanna give $5 for atheist propaganda allied with the CDC (Center for Disease Censorship and Propaganda that started off with deadly experiments on humans). Not.

30. Featured content portal (22,829). So Wikipedia home page gets 19,177,830 hits a year, + millions more to their ,”Recommended by atheist narcissist control-freak nerds for the day” page. No five.

31. Megan Fox (22,573). And no one is hotter than MF? Sad. No five for the nerds who obsess on MF on Wikinerdia.

32. Naruto (22,573). Wow, kid and nerdfest. Where’s Pokemon?

33. Australia (22,544). See popular page 38.

34. Canada (22,437). Canada? Wonder if it has anything to do with marijuana.

35. World War I (22,307). Oh I get it: in American public school they have you do a piece on WWI and WW2, so guess where all the kids and teens and college students go for quick facts to reword, and why: cuz Google and Yahoo put it on the top five results (and no doubt those $5 bills are going to pay Google to be on the top ten.)

36. Vagina (22,295). Of course Jimmy is using the world’s money to teach everyone about the female private parts. No five.

37. List of House episodes (21,950). Wow, talk about sad net pollution.

38. Japan (21,797). (Oh I see why now Germany, Japan, China, Russia, Australia, the UK and the US are in the top 100, after I read through the top 100 and had a lil drink of beer): they were the major players in WWI AND WWII and linked to those pages.

39. Martin Luther King Jr (21,786). I wonder if shampedia mentions that MLK JR was an adulterer who preached a social gospel (a false gospel). Obviously this is public school generated traffic and white washed to appease blacks.

40. Miley Cyrus (21,724). Nerds.

41. Robert Pattinson (21,515). Not Pat Robertson? No, Wikipedia doesn’t want you to learn more about a false Christian and why he’s false. Instead it wants to cater and pander to Twlight obsessed emoMoron nerds like themselves. E-morons are not getting my $5 to learn about a pretty boy.

42. Deadpool (comics) (21,264). Shallow silly nerds who think reading narcissistic babble in comic book = learning something useful. Interesting that Superman, Dare Devil, Ghost Rider, Spiderman, Spawn, Hulk and Punisher aren’t in the top 100. I’m sure they’re close by though.

43. Twilight (2008 film) (21,158). Shallow nerds. It says a lot that Wikipedia attracts people who are into shedding blood and using violence to get there way and pretending to have super powers.

44. Windows 7 (21,018). Yawn. No where else in the universe can you learn about Windows 7 except Wikipedia? Try No doubt Jimmy Wales is friends with the ultimate nerd and pays to get that page in Google’s top five so that Bill Gates, a closet atheist (who wants the world’s population reduced to only what he considers the perfect special people), is put in a good light. I’d bet the people going to this page are W7-haters and elderly people who rarely use a computer and looking for info on them.

45. House (TV series) (20,882). No five.

46. Terminator Salvation (20,743). Nerds.

47. Kristen Stewart (20,538). Nerds.

48. Internet Movie Database (20,422). What? Dumb.

49. 2012 (20,347). New Age nerds : )

50. X-Men Origins: Wolverine (20,150). Ultra nerds.

51. Penis (20,076). Sad. I’m sure this is a page popular with sociopaths and psychopaths.

52. List of Presidents of the United States (19,884). Public school fodder. A clever way to draw in kids to Wikipedia and to get them to trust Wikipedia as a reliable source of info, including the Big Bang, abiogensis, and evolution pages. Evil.

53. List of sex positions (19,876). Ultimate nerd and new age grannies fodder. This page I bet links to India too, which would cause India to have higher traffic than many other pages and countries.

54. Masturbation (19,730). N.E.R.D.S., and kids.

55. William Shakespeare (19,714). Emo and narcissist fodder. Jesus should at least be here.

56. Farrah Fawcett (19,584). Wow nerdy.

57. Germany (19,514). Not “beer”?

58. Swine flu (19,092). CDC propaganda page.

59. Israel (19,077). See above. (Yeah atheists are really gonna be experts on Israel).

60. Google (19,070). Of course.

61. George W. Bush (18,964). Liberal fodder.

62. Global warming (18,809). LOL.

63. Wikipedia About Page (18,803). WOW. Six million+ people a year go to learn the Jimmy Wales invented Wikipedia fantasy and that Wikipedia is mostly free of bias it’s atheists claim. No five, for wasting time.

64. New York City (18,251). The mecca or narcissist/dandies, liberals, atheists, and the avaricious.

65. Tupac Shakur (18,186). Losers.

66. Taylor Swift (18,101). Of course the Swift fans making sure everything is factual.

67. Henry VIII of England (17,912). Because atheists need to find dirt about the funder of the King James Bible. “Did you know HVIII was a homosexual you fundies!? Therefore the KJV is bad and God doesn’t exist and the KJV shouldn’t be read and Christianity fails.” Atheist logic = roach poop.

68. Jade Goody (17,802). Who? Don’t care. Wait, let me guess, something to do with Twilight?

69. Sexual intercourse (17,716). NERDS.

70. The Notorious B.I.G. (17,572). WOW, SAD.

71. Human penis size (17,403). ULTRA SAD NERDFEST. Of course it’s the kids too.

72. 2009 in film (17,270). Try IMDB instead.

73. Anal sex (17,052). Wow nerds, get lives.

74. Twilight (novel) (17,040). *Shakes head*. What happened to Star Wars and Harry Potter? Are they too intellectual for nerds?

75. Natasha Richardson (17,001). Who? Oh is that Charlie Sheen’s wife? No that’s Denise.

76. China (16,935). Wow never heard of China. Gotta go to Wikipedia to learn… oh: Chinese going to read about themselves. Probably public school fodder too. No doubt anti-communists and conservatives wondering what the atheist liberals have to say about their atheist “one child for Chinese citizens only or we’ll kill your extra kid and sterilize you” brethren.

77. American Idol (16,728). Booooooooring.

78. MySpace (16,240). Super boring.

79. France (16,198). Bleah.

80. Metallica (16,110). Nerds trying to be cool by swinging their heads up and down with long hair and shutting out the world with earphones and pretending to play the drums. Really sad and really anti-social.

81. Relapse (album) (16,099). Whatever. Where’s Bach, Mozart or Vivaldi? Not Chinese or Greek ancient music? Not medieval or renaissance “age of atheist enlightenment” music? … oh, cuz the music wasn’t enlightened by atheists. Fail.

82. List of Family Guy episodes (15,961). Massive conniving atheist nerd fail. Where’s South Park? I guess it would be too embarrassing for atheists to frequent a page about paper cut outs babbling childish nonsense? Pathetic.

83. Bleach (manga) (15,947). But not Hentai? I’m sure in a few years Hentai will pop up in the top 100.

84. Russia (15,674). Same as China: learn elsewhere. Wait, the Russians must be googling, “What does helve Westerners think ehbout Russia, what say them on wooorld’s most poopular ensickcloopedia?”

85. Mickey Rourke (15,616). Sounds familiar.

86. Jonas Brothers (15,561). Gay nerds?

87. Vietnam War (15,306). Public school fodder, college fodder, Vietnamese and American veterans and their family doing fact-checking. no doubt to me.

88. Kim Kardashian (15,213). What? Not Kim Jong Il?

89. Lost (season 5) (15,107). Atheist and liberals are truly lost.

90. Selena Gomez (15,086). Get a life. She’s dead. I wonder how many Mexicans make up the traffic to that page.

91. Wolverine (comics) (15,062). Lol nerds.

92. Family Guy (15,013). This again? Talk about obsessed.

93. Valentine’s Day (14,924). Huh… I wonder why nerds are so interested in this day… oh, never mind. I can just imagine, “We’ll you see my nerd blow up doll girlfriend, this isn’t really a day that needs to be celebrated because it’s really a Catholic thing, and look how much people spend on this day to give silly gifts. See, it’s all about making money, so we can safely ignore this day.”

94. Hotmail (14,880). Holy nerd fest.

95. The Dark Knight (film) (14,782). Ultra nerd fest.

96. America’s Next Top Model (14,752). So sad, nerds have no life.

97. Mexico (14,709). Nerds wishing to escape to the greener grass on the other side, dreaming of seducing an ignorant poor chica. I wonder if there’s such thing as Mexican brides.

98. Batman (14,654). Classic nerd icon.

99. List of Heroes episodes (14,652). *Shakes head.* No five.

100. Pornography (14,650). Of course: the ultimate atheist liberal kids-looking-for-easy-porn nerd food. I wonder if Hentai is somewhere in there.

How are atheists and liberals supposed to be more informed about Christianity and religion then Christians when no where in these top 100 is anything about religion, not even about the worlds biggest religions, not even Catholicism, not even the Bible or most popular Bible verse, “Do to others as you’d have them do to you,” or “mistakes in the Bible” even, and not even EVOLUTION! Not DARWIN, NOT CARL SAGAN, NOT MICHIO KAKU, not the word “atheist” or “Big Bang” or “arguments against religion.” And only two wars (no doubt atheists looking for something to blame theists on too) but not the Crusades which atheists love to use as a sole top example of why not to be religious (talk about simple-minded and not reasoning)? WIKIPEDIA IS AWESOME: because it is useful for showing what is on the mind of non-Christians and anti-Christians, even the rest of the world (which no doubt to me parallels the English world’s fixations and idols). It shows atheists, liberals, anti-Christians and the world in general is NOT scholarly, is not more interested in what matters most in life, but rather, temporary pleasure fixes, what kids and silly females and boys are interested in for the moment. Tis is what the atheists loons, nerds with no life, and liberals attract with Widgetpedia: Shallow morons, narcissists, kids, teens, recluses, fanboys and fangirls, in other words, stupid people, shallow people, ignorant people, those curious about what liberals have to say about pop culture figures and idolaters/man-worshipers. What a whopping massive monster of a fail. But of course, it’s not a fail in that atheists have managed to put a somewhat fun and professional face on the chaotic, warped, morbid mass-murder-filled face of atheism, and the atheists who pretend that atheism = “this life now matters most (meaning their life, not yours)” rather than simply meaning “no belief in God or gods.” But again, a fail: because Wikipedia’s information content would have had to have come mostly from theists, since atheists only make up 4% of the world by some estimates, and there is no way it’s more than 10%, and there’s no evidence that atheists contribute more information than theists. It’s the crazy shattered-mirror reflection of the combined faces of the atheists and liberals in control of Wikipedia.

It’s a satisfying feeling to know Wikipedia’s bandwidth is being drained away on stupidity. Hopefully one day an EMP will disable that monster propaganda machine, or God will take it over.

Related Info:

Top 10 Reasons Not to Donate to Wikipedia (haven’t read it yet)
Jan/13/2011: “Jimmy Wales says Wikipedia too complicated for many.” Thanks Captain Obvious. Now guess why Wikipedia is mostly staffed by obsessive compulsive, social misfits and hatemongers with no lives, aka: “geeks”?


Categories: atheism, liberalism, Wikipedia Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Art Bell and the False Flood Prophet, “Doctor” Peter Ward aka “Screed”

July 24, 2010 5 comments

The global warming hysteria continues: Tonight and into the morning Art Bell of Coast to Coast AM has on a ranting grand liberal poobah moron named Peter Douglas Ward (2) (3). Peter Ward is a narcissistic fruity mainstream scientist and a bigot. Besides laughing hysterically at things that aren’t funny, he indirectly implies that scientists are only people who practice science (which most likely is the stereotypical lie of what scientists are: people who experiment with “natural sciences”) and that no creationists are scientists and that scientists who don’t believe in global warming are not scientists. What he is implying is like someone implying that blacks are inferior to whites, or that blacks can’t be scientists, it’s similar because both are discrimination not based on evidence, and therefore hateful. Peter was also pushing the over population myth, claiming that the world’s population must go in reverse in order to raise everyone’s standard of living, which is circular reasoning. His reasoning goes like this:

“The population must be reduced to raise the standard of living, the standard of living must raise by lowering the population.” There is no evidence in the statement. Further, he said, “Everyone has the right to have a high standard of living.” Says who? Who made you God Peter? What is the evidence for this claims? Peter, obey the Bible which says to ask the rich to be generous to the poor, and which teaches the rich to use their money to help the needy, not kill “the burden of these extra mouths” as you said.

Peter also made the crazy statement on this show that increasing carbon dioxide would reduce plant growth, specifically, crops. Uh Peter the “scientists”, the “professor”: plants become healthier and grow better with carbon dioxide. No one has ever shown a crop dying from too much carbon dioxide. No marijuana plant has ever died from too march carbon dioxide. You’re deluded, your common sense buried under a flood of delusions just as God once flooded the world and buried it’s wisdom, so yours is deep under lies, covered in oil.

Art Bell is pandering to this moron as I write this, and earlier on this same show pretentiously claimed that he could understand why certain people were denying Global Warming, which was that it was for political reasons or they were tied into an oil company, but not for the average person, but just a few minutes earlier said that it was because people didn’t want to change their life style and so were in denial, which was evidence that he was pandering and making up stuff like a little kid as he went along. Art Bell, also on this show, said, “People just don’t like change”, an obviously false comment, which he seems to have noticed as he then tried to qualify it by saying, “they don’t like negative change.” Art then made the rhetorical question (and Peter chimed in after) “in there’s an infinite supply of oil” then “why are we drilling” “in dangerous places” to get oil and straining to get it. Here stupid: BECAUSE THE POPULATION OF THE PLANET KEEPS GROWING. You can’t support a planet full of people on one oil well you idiot. And who said it was infinite you liar? Though the Bible does imply that it will last a long time since it prophecied that the children of Ishmael (the Arabs) would make their profit from the blood of the earth (and live by war). Peter also agreed with Art’s reasoning parroting the same type of rhetorical question and also asked why people were using coal when it was easier to turn oil into electricity. Easy: To create more jobs, and because the U.S. government doesn’t always make it easy to drill for oil, and bans various people from drilling or pays them not to. There are national parks with oil but you can’t drill for it and there are environmentalists constantly trying to make it illegal for people to drill for oil in certain places, that includes on dry land, like in Alaska. Further, it’s not as simple as you try to make it seem: not everyone has easy access to oil, like South Africa, so they convert their coal to oil. Further, the cost simply isn’t in the conversion of coal or oil to electricity, there is also the cost of drilling and digging, and depending on the location of the coal and oil, it can be more or less expensive. Further, countries are constantly in a struggle with being energy independent or taking money from various energy companies to take their energy instead (for example the U.S.A. relies heavily on oil from the Middle East because of “price wars” and that includes using bribes).

Oil supplies are also used like weapon (besides being used to run weaponized machinery), for example you can flood a market with it at low prices to lower its price and by doing so lower the income those profiting from it. So if a country that was relying on oil from another country decided to hurt that country, or the oil company they were relying on, they would go exploring for oil, and after finding it, use it for themselves and sell it themselves. And you use coal for war too. Which reminds me: Germany also relied heavily on coal during WWII, converting it to oil and Japan went to war with America over President F.D.R. withholding it from them.

Here’s some advice for you Art: stop ranting, stop being mentally lazy by resorting to stupid cliches, CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH.

Also misleading about Peter’s comment on oil being easier to convert to electricity to coal was that he didn’t mention that oil isn’t simply used for energy (and neither is coal when it is converted to oil only used for energy). It’s used for many other things other than energy, including vaseline.

I can see and hear why Peter is being used as a front for evolution and Big Bang propaganda: he has an appearance of wisdom (physically and from his educational record), but sounds like a liberal 2o-year-old. If only he would accept the fact that his head puppeteers, the rich globalists with the help of their fanatical nature worshipers (hippies), manipulate his anti-petrol propaganda in an attempt to get rid of the middle class, destroy Christianity, and keep third world countries poor and easy to take advantage of.

There is another Peter Ward, a “Peter L. Ward”  of Teton Tectonics who claims that the main cause of global warming is sulfur dioxide from volcanic eruptions, and uses the mythical evidence from the mythical time from before 6,500 years ago as evidence.

I have a message specifically for you Peter:

You said on Coast to Coast AM this morning, when asked by a caller how oil got down thousands of miles deep below the earth into the ocean if it was from plants, simply repeated, WITHOUT EVIDENCE, that it was from plants that were under great pressure. Peter how does that answer how the plants got down there? You didn’t answer the question, you bullshitted because you had no answer. You basically said, “It just is.” So who has the “God of the Gaps”, who is teaching anti-science Mr. It Just Is. Plants get eaten by bacteria and weathered away and burned away for fuel, they don’t magically pile up and rot into oil anymore than the plants of today do.

The Bible is true as is clear from the evidence: (scroll down to the links). You would be aware of this if you weren’t always dwelling on yourself and how you feel about things. As you are supposed to remember: truth is not determined by how you personally feel about it. You can talk all day long about the Earth being underwater, but God already flooded it, as you can see, as anyone can see from the jumble of sea fossils scattered all over the world’s dry land masses, including on the tops of mountains. There is no nice neat organized strata showing an imaginary steady gradual evolution from little “primitive” crystal fairy beings to “big advanced complex” beings. That’s all in your head, which you’ve chosen to fill with fanciful delusions. You are the absurd one to pretend TO SAY THAT YOU SPEAK FOR ALL SCIENTISTS IN YOUR FIELD LET ALONE ALL SCIENTISTS, that is a narcissist talking, not someone who is mentally sound. Who the Hell are you Mr. Liberal Friends Gave Me Fancy Sounding Degrees, to say a creationist isn’t a scientist or that a Christian is not one? Or that “bigger is righter”? What a fool, ignoring the obvious so that you can have fun getting everyone to listen to your drama queenery. “Oh look everyone the world is flooding, oh don’t believe that God Bible man in the sky which said the world could be flooded, that’s fairy toilet paper, but listen to us modern day evolutionist atheists and anti-Christian theists who were the only scientists and came up with all the inventions in the world and are non stop charities (yeah right): the world’s gonna be flooded again!” Is that what God reveals in any prophecies in Revelation? No. But what does it say after the flood occurred: THAT GOD WOULD NOT FLOOD THE WORLD AGAIN AND THAT THE RAINBOW WOULD BE A CONSTANT SIGN OF THIS. MAN IS NOT IN CONTROL OF THE WORLD: GOD IS. And wow, so you know what happened billions of years ago, 15 billion huh? But we Christians are the absurd ones for believing what happened 6,500? Insane much? Backwards much? You’re backwards. The primitive one is you and those who think backwards like you, who accuse others of the very hypocrisy you resort to just to look right, despite being an obvious liar. Listen to God false prophet, not your feelings. He made it convenient for you to learn what he taught, but you come up with every and any arbitrary excuse not to study. “Waaaah, I have to learn more after getting a thorough brainwashing from my evolutionist friends?! No thanks Daniel Knight I’ll stick with my way! No one can change my beliefs!” Yes, I know you’re a religious fanatic, what about it? How can someone with so many degrees be ignoring so much evidence against his insane ranting? You’re corrupt. You should have learned logic and studied morality and religion: life is not livable no matter how many numbers you fill your head with and no matter how many physics facts you learn, if you forget logic and moral laws. The scientific method is not a substitute for do not lie at all It’s not a commandment warning people about the danger of Hell. And if it helps, read Judges, and see if you can spot where it reveals the scientific method. And if it makes you feel any better, God made everyone a scientists. You’re not the only one who 1) Imagines 2) Tries 3) Tries again 4) Gives up or succeeds. That’s programmed into us all genius. Did you know that? Maybe if you weren’t so busy playing follow-my-liberal-feelings-preacher you would have noticed that Mr. I’m a Scientist Haha You’re Not. And Peter, you said you would take on arguments against global warming, why then did you reply with “that’s just a load of crap”, “that’s screed” when you were told that the eugenics movement was apart of the depopulation movement you’re supporting? You’re a liar. And what a hypocrite and weasel: You said on Art’s show this morning that the booing you got from creationists when you spoke scared your eight-year-old, awww poor you and poor eight-year-old, what about the millions of Christian kids murdered by the pagans of Rome, then millions more by the Catholics of Rome, then many millions more and more than just Christians killed by atheists in the name of “progress” and using “evolution” as justification? What about the endless bullying of Christians in atheist dominated countries like China, Russia and it’s former states and Vietnam, the endless tortures and imprisonments and enslaving of Christians in those countries? What about the babies you encourage mothers to murder in their womb, cut up without anesthetics? But yeah: poor you, you got booed when you spoke to endorse TORTURE, BULLYING, AND MURDER OF KIDS, OF BABIES EVEN, and your kid was scared. If you had taught your kid to fear God, and not you, then he wouldn’t have feared his idol dad being boed. What a self-centered, insulting, arrogant, hateful, ignorant wimp. You’re a babbling, gullible sophist, not a professor, and not a “Doctor” as Art and others pretentiously call you.

Learn more about broken logic here: if you’d like and why it is false that the universe and Earth are older than 6,500 years, why the radiometric dating you rely on is false evidence.


I asked Peter to fulfill his claim on taking on anti-global warming arguments. Here was my letter to him:

[On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Daniel Knight wrote:]
You said you would take on the anti-global warming arguments, can you
take on the one here?:

What answer could you possibly give other than, “Oh.” ?

As for email being the most hateful form of communication? Is that some
science based claim or your opinion?

God bless you.

And here was his hypocritical, bigoted biased reply:

There is no god.  Wake up.

Professor Peter D Ward
Dept of Biology
The University of Washington
Seattle, 98195
206-543-2962  ( Office )

In other words, this hypocrite atheist sent me the very hate mail he complained about, all because I asked God to bless him. In other words, he booed me for blessing him, but was perfectly happy to accept Art Bell’s, who has emphatically stated that he doesn’t believe in the Big Bang Theory. Someone that gets as easily upset as Ward, isn’t going to have the mental stamina to know much truth, especially if they spend their time obsessing on controlling what others think and say.

“This only have I found: God made mankind upright, but men have gone in search of many schemes.” – Ecclesiastes 7:29

Bill Gates’ Global Warming Propaganda Speech Refuted

March 4, 2010 12 comments

In February, 2010, Bill Gates rushed a speech at the TED building which I’ve made evident below. What makes it relevant is that his speech was classic propaganda, and that even with his great riches, “all the money in the world” figuratively speaking, his speech was childish and it showed that his wisdom was shallow, having diminished over the years. Yes, he succeeded in becoming a very rich man, the richest for many years, but that wasn’t all due to his wisdom, and especially not due to any righteous words and behavior, but in large part from having had access to his parent’s riches and being a money-hoarding, pushy schemer (2) and (hypocritical (2)).

Whether he realized he was pitching propaganda or not, I don’t know, but that is what it was. It seems to me that someone coached him in what to say, to help him continue to be on the world stage in a positive light, no doubt to try and dwarf his history of failures (the biggest of which was his, and to this day, for no apparent logical reason, allowing at least twenty-five highly efficiency-sapping annoyances in Windows XP, Vista and 7 (and here is a security major flaw that I just discovered which was recently discovered to affect nearly all Windows OS’s:,9477.html).

The speech appears to propaganda because it is dumbed down so that even children can understand it, contains simplistic lies (insulting ones), for example that make it appear as if all the top scientists in the world are in agreement with what he’s saying, which is an easily discovered lie.

Now why was his simpleton speech aimed at adults? Perhaps it was to make it look like his speech wasn’t a simplistic one meant for kids, but for adults. The main target audience must have been young adult teens, or a little older than 19, and the elderly being that people in their 20’s and up to 65 already know the line “C02 bad, makes Earth hot, ice melt, polar bears die, penguins drown, world sinks under wadder. Dis is bad.” Teens are usually to busy doing stupid things to care to remember words like C02 and the elderly, suffering from senility often and major fatigue would be likely to forget it to, and being that everyone knows Bill Gates is a billionaire (which is rare and something most people wish they were) and both a failure and a success, would be likely to at least see a partial transcript of his speech passed down by someone who was interested in what he had to say, like me. By the time I realized there was a transcript with the video’s page, I had made my own unique one, but that saves me from having to deal with copyright attacks.

Either he is severely out out of touch with reality (so that he doesn’t realize that most Westerner’s already know the basics), or didn’t realize he was being deceived into targeting teens and the elderly, that is my educated opinion.

He also, as you may have heard by now, seemed to accidentally admit that vaccines were meant to reduce the human population of the world. What would he say to make it appear as if that wasn’t what he meant, or what whoever crafted the speech for him meant. I’m thinking… Ok, now I remember what I was trying to remember: That people who are healthy and prosperous don’t have as many kids because they don’t need anyone to take care of them right away, and vaccines are supposed to make you healthier. However, during the part of that speech that he said that, the audience laughed at an interesting moment, which indicates like I said, that his audience was already informed about global warming and alleged overpopulation, especially being that they laughed at a moment that indicated they were thinking about genocide or something like it. Read and watch the video for yourself if you don’t believe me.

Here were the most relevant parts showing the childish, time-wasting, simplicity, claims without evidence, and the “top scientists are whoever I think they are” lines:

… The climate is getting worse, means that many years, their crops won’t grow. … And that leads to starvation… And so the climate changes, will be terrible for them. … Also, the price of energy is very important to them. … Advanced civilization, uh is based on advances in energy. … But, as we make it cheaper,

(takes a breath and looks worried as he starts to say): we need to meet a new constraint. And that constraint, has to do with, C02. C02, is warming the planet. Aaand, thee equation on C02, is actually euh, uh very straight forward one.

Bill helps us masses of simpleton idiots to finally understand what C02 does with this
simple picture, which is clear scientific proof that much C02 is very negative,
so negative in fact that Earth will turn into Mars in just 40 years,
at which point Windows XP will lose any chance of ever being fixed.

If you sum up, the C02, that gets emitted, that leads to temperature uh increase. And that temperature increase, leads to some very negative effects. The effects on the weather, ump perhaps worse than the indirect effects, in that, uh theih natural ecosystems can’t adjust (said adjust with emphasis) to these rapid changes, and so you get ecosystems collapses. Now the exact amount, of how you map fromuh uh, certain increase in of C02, to what temperature will be and where the positive feedbacks are, there’s some uncertainty there, but not very much. And there’s shertainly uncertainty about how bad those effects would be, but they will be extremely bad.

I asked the top scientists in this several times, “Do we really have to get down, to near zero, can’t we just you know cut in half or in a quarter, and the answer is that until we get near to zero,

the temperature will continue to rise. …

And somehow we have to make changes, that will bring that (C02) down to zero. … So we have to go from rapidly rising, to falling, and falling all the way to zero. … Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero. Uh thats… (audience makes long laugh) Uh first we’ve got population. … that’s headed up to about 9 billion. … Now if we do a really great job sooon, new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that perhaps by 10 or 15 percent, but there we see an increase [in population at the same time] of uh about 1.3 [percent]. (end)

After his stupid speech, he did a Q & A with an ugly middle-aged Irish person with a gay lisp (no doubt to me so that Bill would be appealing to gays and foreigners and so that his speech would seem to be of worldwide importance). That he chose an Irish person was extremely stupid, because Ireland has one of the smallest populations in the world of any country except tiny islands. It only has about four million people and has an area of 42,712 sq miles: a much population smaller than the poor African country Benin, which has 7.1 million people and is only a little larger in size at 43,483 square miles (771 square miles more). On top of that, Ireland’s population is in severe decline. The last thing they need is Bill’s vaccines.

Here is a plain contradiction that Bill made, showing that he is lying:

Now the exact amount, of how you map fromuh uh, certain increase in of C02, to what temperature will be and where the positive feedbacks are, there’s some uncertainty there, but not very much. And there’s [c]ertainly uncertainty about how bad those effects would be, but they will be extremely bad.

Besides the grammar slips, what matters most is that he said there uncertainty about how bad the effects would be, but in the next half of his short sentence says it will specifically be “extremely bad” not, “but it could be extremely bad”. So which is it: it might be bad or extremely bad?

In addition to that, Bill is either ignorant about nuclear power generators or is lying, since there are nuclear generators that don’t put out weaponizable waste, and are virtually clean power generators.

And what is he talking about when he says that ecosystems could be destroyed by the drastic weather changes: Hello Bill: ever heard of a sunny day suddenly turning rainy, or snow appearing in large amounts where there was no snow? How about giant-sized-hail showers? How about hurricanes, monsoons, floods and large forest fires? Does the plant like all just suddenly disappear never to return because of those things? When a volcano erupts and pours lava everywhere, does it stay barren of life forever? And are any of those events gradual weather changes? Obviously not, and yet he wants us all to worry and spend our hard earned money to prevent GRADUAL whether changes in which the temperature rises one or two degrees over 100 to 1000 years, which according to Darwinists, all living things would adapt to and become more complex allowing them to have greater intelligence! So these Darwinists, like Bill Gates, are blind, confused, liars, and want us to fight against evolution, the very thing they make out to be a god!

He also gave us a deadline, forty years (global warmers think 40 years is sudden?), which was very important since it gives those who are truly concerned about the truth a way to test if whether or not what these false prophets are giving us accurate prophecies, or lies.

Near the end of his speech he said that the “R & D is ridiculously underfunded”. Hey billionaire: put your money where your begging the poor to stop breathing (and in so doing kill off most of the plant life) is. Put up the bulk of your own money and hoarded charity money, then you can preach to the poor masses you believe are beneath you in all their wisdom. They were “smart enough” to buy your Hellish junk weren’t they? Junk you couldn’t be bothered to improve, but fobbed off on idiots who carried over many of the same problems from your older operating systems and introduced new ones from Hell. Here is the video source of Bill’s semi-rant.

So this is the result of turning away from God, the source of truth: believing lies, lying, and until you become insane from the confusion that results in having to filter out your own lies.

A rich man may be wise in his own eyes,
but a poor man who has discernment sees through him.
Proverbs 28:11

Liberals Score Points On ”Conservatives” Beck and O’Reilly

February 27, 2010 Leave a comment

Liberal Keith Oberman highlights the lies of news reporter Bill O’Reilly and pandering radio show entertainer Glenn Beck:

Glenn Beck went goes on O’Reily’s show to explain his childish attack on a caller named Kathy who challenged his opposition to the Obama healthcare plan:


Glenn Beck Was Against the American Health Care System Before He Was For It

8/14/2009/6:43 AM
by The Cajun Boy

In January of 2008, just 16 months ago, Glenn Back underwent “ass surgery” to remove a hemorrhoid. The Daily Show dug up video of Beck detailing how horrific his personal experience was, video that contradicts everything he’s been saying lately.

This should serve as yet another bright, shining example of how much of an utter fraud Beck is. You gotta give the guy some credit though — he’s a charlatan’s charlatan, a near-perfect modern television bullshit artist who fully understands how the slightest glance, vocal inflection, or codeword can plant a seed deep down inside of a feeble mind and germinate.

But still, it’s hard not to watch this clip and come away feeling that he’s an even bigger piece of shit than you probably thought he was previously, because it’s just so goddamn obvious that the man will do or say anything to dig his hook even deeper into the sad dolts who tune into to his show each day seeking guidance. – More here


by Paul Joseph Watson

Anointed Leader Of Conservative Movement Glenn Beck Now Believes In Global Warming

The stunning duplicity of Fox News host Glenn Beck has been exposed once again after the talk show host told USA Weekend magazine that he now believes in man-made global warming, after years of assuring his viewers that he was on the side of skeptics who questioned the science behind AGW claims.

In an article entitled Don’t judge Beck by his cover, Beck tells interviewer Dennis McCafferty, “You’d be an idiot not to notice the temperature change.”

“He also says there’s a legit case that global warming has, at least in part, been caused by mankind,” writes McCafferty, under the subheadline, “He believes in global warming.”

Beck’s sudden conversion to the increasingly debunked man-made global warming belief system is a shocking stab in the back of conservatives who consider Beck to be their anointed leader.

For years, Beck has railed against the insistence on behalf of global warming alarmists that “the debate is over” on man-made climate change, a claim that has been soundly trashed by the recent and ongoing Climategate scandal.

Even before Beck arrived at Fox News, when he still had his CNN show, he was attacking global warming as the greatest scam in history. – More here.


Does Glenn Beck really believe in global warming?

2/26/2010/12:40 AM Eastern
by Chelsea Schilling

“Is this satire? I really want to know!”

That’s just one of many questions bloggers and Glenn Beck fans are asking about a Feb. 21 interview story in a leading national Sunday-newspaper magazine that claims the newest superstar among conservatives “believes in global warming.”

USA Weekend interviewed Glenn Beck for its article “Don’t judge Beck by his cover,”

“You’d be an idiot not to notice the temperature change,” Beck said, according to USA Weekend. – More here.


Beck’s Failure To Retract Global Warming Advocacy Provokes Online Firestorm

by Paul Joseph Watson

Becks Failure To Retract Global Warming Advocacy Provokes Online Firestorm

Glenn Beck has failed to respond to a firestorm of reaction to his comments made during a February 21st interview with USA Weekend magazine in which he completely reversed his position on climate change by revealing that he believed in man-made global warming.

As we reported earlier this week, Beck appeared to stab his conservative audience in the back when he told USA Weekend magazine that man-made climate change was occurring in an article entitled Don’t judge Beck by his cover.

In the article, Beck tells interviewer Dennis McCafferty, “You’d be an idiot not to notice the temperature change.”

“He also says there’s a legit case that global warming has, at least in part, been caused by mankind,” writes McCafferty, under the sub headline, “He believes in global warming.” – More here. Suddenly Finds Out: ”global warming data skewed by heat [from technology]”

February 16, 2010 Leave a comment

Weather stations which produced data pointing towards man-made global warming may have been compromised by local conditions, a new report suggests.

by Heidi Blake

The IPCC claimed the Himalayan glaciers will disappear by 2035 – hundreds of years earlier than other studies suggest Photo: ALAMY

The findings are set to cast further doubt on evidence put forward by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which claims the science supporting rising temperatures is unequivocal.

The report co-written by Anthony Watts, an American meteorologist and climate sceptic, shows photographs of weather stations near heat-generating equipment which could be distorting their readings.

Some are next to air-conditioning units or on waste-treatment plants, while one sits alongside a waste incinerator. A weather station at Rome airport was found to catch the hot exhaust fumes emitted by taxiing jets.

Rising temperatures around the stations, which have been in use for 150 years, could also have been caused by urbanisation, the study claimed. One weather station at Manchester airport, which was built when the surrounding land was mainly fields, is now surrounded by heated buildings. – More here.

This info is over 2 years old, and yet Telegraph, who has pushed the global warming nonsense, and still does, acts like this is new info.

National Post Exposes Massive Wikipedia Global Warming Conspiracy

December 23, 2009 1 comment

The Climategate Emails describe how a small band of climatologists cooked the books to make the last century seem dangerously warm. The emails also describe how the band plotted to rewrite history as well as science, particularly by eliminating the Medieval Warm Period, a 400 year period that began around 1000 AD. The Climategate Emails reveal something else, too: the enlistment of the most widely read source of information in the world — Wikipedia — in the wholesale rewriting of this history. …

band members turned to their friends in the media and to the blogosphere, creating a website called “The idea is that we working climate scientists should have a place where we can mount a rapid response to supposedly ‘bombshell’ papers that are doing the rounds” in aid of “combating dis-information,” one email explained, referring to criticisms of the hockey stick and anything else suggesting that temperatures today were not the hottest in recorded time. One person in the nine-member team — U.K. scientist and Green Party activist William Connolley — would take on particularly crucial duties.

Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used information source the world has ever known – Wikipedia. Starting in February 2003, just when opposition to the claims of the band members were beginning to gel, Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site. He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling. …

All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity.

Full article here.

More information on The Connolley Conspiracy here.

Climate Change Attacks European Train, Strands Tens of Thousands

December 23, 2009 1 comment

When Will the AntiChrist Appear?

December 15, 2009 Leave a comment

It seems to me, that the former President Bush senior and Obama were two living symbols from God, strong clear examples from Him, as to how easily an Anti-Christ could deceive most of the world. Someone more clever than these two, with great beauty and charisma and the political and monetary support, could easily deceive the world. The reason it would be more likely than ever is due to the extreme ignorance of most people, and their wanting to save face after what is most likely going to be a humiliating defeat at Copenhagen. The world will focus its anger against the fundamentalist Christians who most opposed the Global Warmers. The atheists of Russia, China and Vietnam may also join in hypocritically just to crush fundamentalist Christianity and/or because they will think that the fundamentalist Christians were deliberately trying to impoverish these countries via the anti-carbon dioxide treaty of Copenhagen (which they might think because America is thought of as a Christian nation). Fundamentalist Catholics might also be persecuted. According to the Bible, the anti-Christ will also attack the Catholics and not just the true Christians. He may use their opposition against Global Warmers as at least part of his justification for attacking these two groups.

If civil war breaks out in the USA between the libs and the conservs, it’s pretty obvious the libs would lose fast without military and police support. Though libs are violent, in general they lack the intelligence necessary to use it effectively. I doubt the U.S. military would help the libs since libs seem to be opposed to the U.S. military, seeing them as mostly fundamentalist Christians. I suspect the reason that Bush and Obama let the Iraq and Afghanistan wars drag on for so long and with poor management, was to keep the money flowing to their business friends of the military-industrial complex, and to wear down and indirectly murder the U.S. military. This is also evidenced by the harmful vaccines that the troops were forced to take (for example in the Gulf War). With the U.S. military weakened and tired from war, the U.N. troops would have a better chance at subduing them and the conservs. I realized this months ago, except for the the inadequate-amount-of-troops-for-more-money-scheme, which I realized about four days ago.

I think that the libs will wait about five years to shed the humiliation of their global warming  scam while working on finding someone to become a world leader as they wished Obama to be, but who clearly won’t be due to his great failings and endless, annoying “uh”‘s.

I think the world may be reluctant however to be quick to embrace in mass another supposed savior after having been badly duped by Obama. But would then would get them to do so? It would have to be another disaster, on a larger scale than 9/11. Earthquakes will be on the rise for sure in the next five years, and with the 2012 scare, will greatly help persuade world into finding another saviour, one who will save them from the imminent end of the world in flames, in their minds, rather than some decades away supposed one degree rise in temperature.

Darwinist and Liberal ‘Integrity’ Torched by ClimateGate

November 30, 2009 Leave a comment

Has anyone noticed how Darwinists were the ones who were mainly promoting and worrying over global warming, and that it was the opposite in the case of Creationists?:

And now, it’s recently been found that the some of the top global warming scientists, all Darwinists, had been lying about there being a global warming trend, and that Earth had actually been cooling, possibly about to enter another ice age even (on the ice age site is a link to a book being sold which goes along with the false claim that Earth is billions of years old, and that animals suddenly evolved new useful features or into other animals because of magnetic reversals, but obviously magnets don’t cause people to grow wings or tails).

One notorious psuedo-scientist, a trolling idiot, claimed that it wasn’t true that Darwinists were the ones always promoting global warming when a notorious plagiarist atheist and wannabe-wise woman noticed the same thing months ago, claiming, “Not true” because oil companies were denying global warming. So a few oil companies are the majority of Darwinists? There are so many millions of Darwinists oil companies that other atheists not apart of any oil companies or any company at all are just a small minority? And how can oil companies deliberately lying (lying in their own minds) count as people who sincerely deny the truth, if, again, they “knew” they were lying? How absurd and stupid atheists are, especially Darwinist ones.

On top of that, Mr. “Not True” Atheist was lying about all oil companies denying global warming, though in my judgment in his ignorance being that he busies himself trolling Christian creationists, desperately and frantically posting mere claims without evidence to defend anti-Christian doctrine, like he did in this case, rather than carefully researching.

Here’s another passage, 2 years older than Mr. Not True’s lie, which refutes it,

And just a few words later, months before the Prison Planet article, this Businessweek article then says,

There’s a maddening grammatical error in the top part of that article by the way.

So, Psuedo Christian Science Monitorers, who seven months ago mocked Christians and those who believed in Intelligent Design scientists over their disbelief of global warmin, lumping them in with astrologers, and who continues to mock them, clearly, the jokers, are you, the evil type: mockers. Not April fools, you liberal fools.

Atheist Darwinist Global Warmingist Self-called “Dawdler” Hates Bible Verses, Juz Cuz

January 6, 2009 Leave a comment

Since atheist” Dawdler” of Wikipedia is so angry at the Bible for being true, let’s see if he can tolerate atheist and Darwinist verses:


1. “Christianity has fought, still fights, and will fight science to the desperate end over evolution, because evolution destroys utterly and finally the very reason Jesus’ earthly life was supposedly made necessary. Destroy Adam and Eve and the original sin, and in the rubble you will find the sorry remains of the son of god. Take away the meaning of his death. If Jesus was not the redeemer that died for our sins, and this is what evolution means, then Christianity is nothing.” – G. Richard Bozarth, “The Meaning of Evolution”, American Atheist, 20 Sept. 1979, p. 30 (the true meaning of atheist "evolutionary science")

2. “Despite many claims to the contrary, life does not begin at conception: It is an unbroken chain that stretches back nearly to the origin of the Earth, 4.6 billion years ago. Nor does human life begin at conception: it is an unbroken chain dating back to the origin of our species, tens or hundreds of thousands of years ago. Every human sperm and egg is, beyond the shadow of a doubt, alive. They are not human beings of course. However it could be argued that neither is a fertilized egg.” – Carl Sagan, “Is It Possible To Be Pro-Life and Pro-Choice”. Parade Magazine, 22 April 1990, p. 5 (wow dead Carl, ".6" huh? You musta been there dead guy. Not)

3. “By the sixth week, the embryo is 13 millimeters (about 1/2 inch) long. The eyes are still on the side of the head, as in most animals and the reptilian face has connected slits where the mouth and nose eventually will be.”

“By the end of the seventh week, the tail is almost gone, and sexual characteristics can be discerned (although both sexes look female). The face is mammalian, but somewhat pig-like.”

"By the end of the eighth week, the [human fetus’] face resembles a primate, but is still not quite human.” – Carl Sagan, “Is It Possible To Be Pro-Life and Pro-Choice”. Parade Magazine, 22 April 1990, p. 6 (someone dead was living in Deluded La La Fantasy Land)

4. “Why has it taken 100 years to learn that one of the largest of all dinosaurs Apatosaurus (Brontosaurus of the school book) has been wearing the wrong head? That seems rather basic. How did this mix-up occur; and where has the old fellow’s head been all of this time? The answer to the last question is, of course, that its true head has been in the museum’s research collection for all these many years, patiently waiting for research to catch up to reality.” – Taken from the display notebook at Dinosaur National Park Museum, Vernal Utah. (Ooopsie: were that many Darwinists easy to fool, talk about "gullible", "blind", "ignorance-loving" and "living in Fantasy Land")

5. “Take black matter, for example. As fate would have it, the most recent and popular theories in physics just don’t work. It’s not as if there are some loose threads around the edges; the theories don’t work at all. If they did, the universe would instantaneously fall in on itself or fly apart. Now those of us who are not astrophysicists would probably do something like discard the theories. Not astrophysicists. They readjust the uncooperative universe to fit their theories, postulating a gigantic quantity of invisible gravity-producing stuff they call black matter, even though it’s not black and maybe not even matter. And there you are. Just like that, the modern, popular theories are back in business. I can imagine that readers new to physics and its way of doing things might be skeptical, but those of us who are higher up in the world of science feel nothing but anticipation in all this theorizing. It could, after all, be a step toward a newer and even sillier putty.” – Roger L. Welsch, “Astrophys Ed”, Natural History, February 1994, p. 25 (Can I have some Dark Matter for dinner Mr. Ben "I Only Believe What I See" Dawdler? Please Mr. I Don’t Have Faith In Anything Dawdler? What’s wrong, can’t you see any Dark Matter and get some for me? Oh, you can’t see it? Why do you believe in it then, you dummy? Contradict yourself much hypocrite?)

6. “In seeking to understand why the Haeckelian view persisted so long, we have also to consider the alternatives. We often are highly conservative and will hold to a viewpoint longer than is justified when there is no alternative or, worse, when the logical alternative upsets the rest of our world view.” Keith Stewart Thomson, “Marginalia Ontogeny and phylogeny recapitulated”, American Scientist Vol. 76, May-June 1988, p. 274 (Say what about sticking with fantasies and illogical views? I must be fantasizing again, cuz Dawdler the atheist said so, yeah. Not)

7. “The secrets of evolution are time and death. Time for the slow accumulations of favorable mutations, and death to make room for new species.” – Carl Sagan, “Cosmos”, program entitled “One Voice in the Cosmic Fugue.” (Well no wonder atheists like Dawdler love hatered so much, it leads to death. No wonder they’ve killed 150+ plus million people, mostly religious, in less than 100 years; they think it’s progress!)

8. “Atheism is the philosophy, both moral and ethical, most perfectly suited for a scientific civilization. If we work for the American Atheists today, Atheism will be ready to fill the void of Christianity’s demise when science and evolution triumph.
Without a doubt, humans and civilization are in sore need of the intellectual cleanness and mental health of Atheism.” – G. Richard Bozarth, “The Meaning of Evolution”, American Atheist, 20 Sept. 1979, p. 30 (But I thought atheism was just "no beliefs"… shakes head at atheists’ inablity to get their fantasies straight.)

9. “These “creation-science” textbooks, if allowed in our schools, can only serve to increase that mental anguish by teaching that the Genesis gibberish is a legitimate scientific theory.” – G. Richard Bozarth, “The Meaning of Evolution”, American Atheist, 20 Sept. 1979, p. 19 (And whatever the Darwinists insult makes them true. Truely they are ill.)

10. “We can use TV as a potent propaganda machine. The stage is set for the infusion of true Satanic philosophy and potent (emotionally inspiring) music to accompany the inverted crosses and pentagrams. Instead of holding our rituals in chambers designed for a few dozen people, we are moving into auditoriums crowded with ecstatic Satanists thrusting their fists forward in the sign of the horns.” – Anton Szandor LaVey, “The Devil’s Notebook”, p. 85 (Someone say "propaganda"? Nah, couldn’t be, I must be living in that creationist Fantasy Land)

11. “THE NINE SATANIC STATEMENTS … 4. Are we not all predatory animals by instinct? If humans ceased wholly from preying upon each other, could they continue to exist?”
“7. Satan represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, more often worse than those that walk on all-fours, who, because of his “divine spiritual and intellectual development,” has become the most vicious animal of all!” – Anton Szandor LaVey, “The Satanic Bible”, p. 25, 33. (Someone "atheistic" say something about violence being good? Nah, must be my fantasy weirdo self just makin that up with Bible verses again. Silly me.)

12. “All Abortions 25% Off: In January, a Denver General Hospital clinic began a program to attract reluctant inner-city pregnant women to get prenatal care by offering them free lottery tickets. And in May, a fee-charging family planning clinic in Wilmington, Del., began offering abortions at a 25 percent discount to women under age 18.” – Chuck Shepherd, News of the Weird, The Salt Lake Tribune, July 25, 1993, p. A-17 (Didn’t you say something about weird Dawdler? I remember you called someone a weirdo, were you talking about me, or you, who supports weirdos like this, who try to profit of murdering defenseless kids? Are you there sicko?)

13. “In May, biology professor George Hunt of the University of California-Irvine led a field trip to the Channel Islands near Oxnard, Calif., where he had originally spotted what he called ‘lesbian sea gulls’ in the 1970’s. Hunt had reported then that 14 percent of the 1,200 gull pairs he studied were lesbian. He admitted that he cannot tell males and females apart, but inferred because of the larger number of eggs in some nests that the hatching pair of gulls on those nests were both female.” – Chuck Shepherd, News of the Weird, The Salt Lake Tribune, October 24, 1993 (What weirdos these Darwinists are, living in the Fantasy Land in their stupid gullible heads they are)

14. “It is better for all the world if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.” – Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), p. 205 (Weirdo Darwinist who pretends to be for "progress" and loving said what?

15. “It cannot be accidental, one is tempted to conclude, that the percentage of salt in our bloodstreams is roughly the same as the percentage of salt in the oceans of the world. The long and intricate process by which evolution helped to shape the complex interrelationship of all living and nonliving things may be explicable in purely scientific terms, but the simple fact of the living world and our place on it evokes awe, wonder, a sense of mystery—a spiritual response when one reflects on its deeper meaning.” – Al Gore, “Earth in the Balance”, p. 264 (What a dumb deluded weirdo that Al Global Warming Gore is. I wish these dumb Darwinists would shut up about their Invisible Global Warming Monster already)

16. “Human beings are made up mostly of water, in roughly the same percentage as water is to the surface of the earth. Our tissues and membranes, our brains and hearts, our sweat and tears—all reflect the same recipe for life, in which efficient use is made of those ingredients available on the surface of the earth…” … “But above all we are oxygen (61 percent) and hydrogen (10 percent), fused together in the unique molecular combination known as water, which makes up 71 percent of the human body. So when environmentalists assert that we are, after all, part of the earth, it is no mere rhetorical flourish. – Al Gore, “Earth in the Balance”, pp. 99-100 (Is a Darwinist, again, copying the Bible and AGAIN, trying to steal credit away from the Bible that they claim shouldn’t be quoted to promote the truth? I coulda sword God said something about making man from the dust of the earth… must be my fantasy prone imagination again. How convenient that Darwinist Dawdler and his dummy friends don’t want creationists quoting the Bible, but are plenty happy to steal teachings from it. Do as the Darwinists say, but not as they do huh Darwinist Dawdler? Hypocrite.)

17. “Human evolution, of course, is responsible for our very long period of childhood, during much of which we are almost completely dependent on our parents. As Ashley Montagu first pointed out decades ago, evolution encouraged the development of larger and larger human brains, but our origins in the primate family placed a limit on the ability of the birth canal to accommodate babies with ever-larger heads. Nature’s solution was to encourage an extremely long period of dependence on the nurturing parent during infancy and childhood, allowing both mind and body to continue developing in an almost gestational way long after birth.” – Al Gore, “Earth in the Balance”, p. 229 (Al Gore, a Carbon-hating (Carbon-hating = Life-hating) Darwinist, pushing the "bigger brains = smarterbrains" myth, after having been shown false DECADES ago.)

18. “I am an atheist, out and out. It took me a long time to say it. I’ve been an atheist for years and years, but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable to say one was an atheist, because it assumed knowledge that one didn’t have. Somehow it was better to say one was a humanist or an agnostic. I finally decided that I’m a creature of emotion as well as of reason. Emotionally I am an atheist. I don’t have the evidence to prove that God doesn’t exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn’t that I don’t want to waste my time.”
Isaac Asimov, “Free Inquiry”, Spring 1982, vol. 2 no. 2, p. 9 (Wow, so this highly respected atheist Darwinist by Darwinists admits to believing God doesn’t exist without evidence. And Dawdler called me a weirdo and told me that creationists are the fanciful ones? Creation SCIENTISTS and Calvinist Creationists believe on evidence unlike you weirdos who believe on ur special little feelings.)

19. “Everybody knows fossils are fickle; bones will sing any song you want to hear.”
J. Shreeve, “Argument over a woman”, 1990, Discover, Vol. 11 (8), p. 58 (As in DISCOVER MAGAZINE? THAT SAME DARWINIST ATHEISM-BIASED PRESTIGIOUS AMONG ATHEISTS AND DARWINISTS MAGAZINE? I must be fantasizing again because Dawdler said so! Right Dawdler?)

20. “Imaginations run riot in conjuring up an image of our most ancient ancestor—the creature that gave rise to both apes and humans. This ancestor is not apparent in ape or human anatomy nor in the fossil record.” … “…anatomy and the fossil record cannot be relied upon for evolutionary lineages. Yet palaeontologists persist in doing just this.”

21. The Nature of the Fossil Record. …

95% of the fossils (by number) consist of shallow marine organisms (e.g. corals, shellfish) Of the remaining 5%, 95% are all the algae and plant/tree fossils (including the coal) and all the other invertebrate fossils (e.g. insects)

5% of the 5% (or 0.25% of the entire fossil record) are the vertebrate fossils (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals)

only 1% of this 0.25% (or 0.0025% of the entire fossil record) are vertebrate fossils that consist of more than a single bone! (e.g. there are only about 2,100 dinosaur skeletons in all the world’s museums.)


22. “‘When paleontologists see Archaeopteryx, they see an earth-bound dinosaur that somehow mysteriously sprouted feathers for swatting insects or some other purpose, and they say flight originated from the ground up.’ Feduccia says. ‘However, when most ornithologists see Archaeopteryx, they see a flying bird because everything about feathers says flight to them. The conclusion we have drawn is that flight originated from trees down, which makes a lot more sense.’” Alan Feduccia, Professor of biology at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “News Notes”. Geotimes. April 1993: p. 6 (YOU CREATIONIST! ALAN’S A WEIRDO CREATIONIST EVERYONE! DON’T BELIEVE HIS LIES! WATCH *SNICKER SNARK*, I BET HE’S GONNA QUOTE A HOST OF BIBLE VERSES AS A RESPONSE! WATCH EVERYONE. NANNY NANNY BOO BOO ALAN I KNOW UR A CREATIONIST BUT WHAT AM I! HAH I GOT YOU NOW, YOU CAN’T QOUTE THE BIBLE ALAN CUZ I MADE FUN OF IT AND SAID I HATED IT HAH!)

23. “Many animals which are well-known and accepted were once controversial—or at least ‘unexpected’ [BY DARWINISTS] Some of the more interesting of these cryptozoological precedents are:

* The gorilla, largest of all the primates, discovered in Central Africa in 1847;

* Baird’s tapir, discovered in Central America in 1863;

* The giant panda, discovered in China in 1869, but not collected alive until 1936;

* Przewalski’s horse, discovered in Mongolia in 1881;

* The mountain gorilla, a subspecies, discovered in East Africa in 1902;

* The okapi, a fossil giraffid, discovered in Zaire in 1901;

* The pygmy chimpanzee, described in 1929, but not brought back to Europe from Zaire
until the late 1930’s;

* The coelacanth, a 6-foot Mesozoic fish (a true ”living fossil”), discovered in South Africa
in 1938;

* The Chacoan peccary, a Pleistocene fossil form, discovered alive in Paraguay in 1975;

* Megamouth, a 15-foot shark, representing a completely new species, genus, and family,

24. “Insect resistance to a pesticide was first reported in 1947 for the Housefly (Musca domestica) with respect to DDT. Since then resistance to one or more pesticides has been reported in at least 225 species of insects and other arthropods. The genetic variants required for resistance to the most diverse kinds of pesticides were apparently present in every one of the populations exposed to these man-made compounds.” – Francisco J. Ayala. “The Mechanisms of Evolution”, Scientific American, Sept. 1978, p. 65 (Francisco is a creationist everyone! Don’t believe him! And you can trust the Scientific American, becuz, becuz, well Dawdler said it’s American! That’s why! And obviously it’s just a creationist propaganda tool! Like Dawdler says, you can’t trust any Americans! They are all creationist and not scientists, they are all stupid losers!)

25. “Scientists at the University of Alberta have revived bacteria from members of the historic Franklin expedition who mysteriously perished in the Arctic nearly 150 years ago. Not only are the six strains of bacteria almost certainly the oldest ever revived, says medical microbiologist Dr. Kinga Kowalewska-Grochowska, Three of them also happen to be resistant to antibiotics… In this case, the antibiotics clindamycin and cefoxitin, both of which developed more than a century after the men died, were among those used.” –
Ed Struzik, Dr. Kinga Kowalewska-Grochowska, “Ancient bacteria revived”, Sunday Herald, 16 Sept. 1990 (What’s ur point huh liars?! HUH! ARE YOU CREATIONISTS! YES YOU ARE! DAWDLER SAID SO! NOW GO QUOTE SOME BIBLE VERSES!)

26. “Darwin calculated that at the rate of one baby elephant per breeding couple every 10 years, starting with a single pair, there would be 15 million elephants in only 500 years.”

27. “But the reports of Eve’s death may have been greatly exaggerated. Indeed, no one argues with the idea that all modern humans inherited their mitochondrial DNA from one common female ancestor. But what is in dispute is the hypothesis first put forth in 1987 by molecular anthropologist Allan Wilson of University of California, Berkeley who claimed to know Eve’s age and whereabouts-that she lived about 200,000 years ago in Africa.”

28. American Atheists, today, has demanded that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission modify its newly issued regulations and guidelines to include protection for Atheists against religious harassment in the workplace. These demands include the following:
(1) The physical work place, itself, should be religion-free, that is without religious radio programs, signs, framed mottos, pictures, poems, calendars, ornaments, jewelry, brochures, crucifixes, Bibles or religious literature, and religious notices (on shared communications boards). – “American Atheists” Press Release, For release: May 2, 1994 (LIEEEEEEEES!!!! ATHEISTS DON’T HATE RELIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGION!!!!! WE JUST HAVE NO BELIEFS! WHY WON’T YOU BELIEVE USSSSSSS????!!!!)

29. “One interesting idea put forward in 1962 supposes that the evolution of those flowering plants was followed by the first appearance of the butterflies and moths… The caterpillars of butterflies and moths feed almost entirely on plants: today their numbers are kept down by natural enemies, notably birds, but when the caterpillars first appeared on the scene the birds had not yet realized how good they were to eat. For some time, therefore, the caterpillar population increased without check. They ate so much plant food that none remained for the plant-eating dinosaurs; the plant-eating dinosaurs died of starvation, and so the meat-eating dinosaurs which preyed on them also without food.”
Alan Charig, “A New Look At The Dinosaurs”, pp. 150-151

“On the other hand, they may have eaten too much and died of overeating! A further possibility is that there were too many meat-eating dinosaurs; they ate all the plant-eaters and then themselves died of hunger. One popular idea is that the little mammals of the Cretaceous were very fond of dinosaur eggs and ate so many of them that the dinosaurs died out.

It has sometimes been suggested that the dinosaurs were poisoned…”
“Other causes put forward include parasites, diseases, slipped discs, shrinking brain and greater stupidity, over-specialization and inability to change…”
“The latest idea in 1982 is that the gradual warming of the earth led to premature cataract in the eyes of the dinosaurs; they eventually became blind and perished before they were old enough to reproduce.” – Alan Charig, “A New Look At The Dinosaurs”, p. 151 (What!?!?! I THOUGHT IT WAS A METEOR THAT HIT THE DINOSAURS, AND LIKE, THEY DIED N STUFF!!!!??? ALAN MUST BE A CREATIONIST!!!! DON’T LISTEN TO HIM HE’S JUST TRYING TO MAKE US DARWINISTS LOOK STUPID AND CONFUSED AND LIKE WE’RE JUST MAKING STUFF UP SO WE DON’T HAVE TO LISTEN TO THE BIBLE!!!)

30. “Among the even less likely causes suggested for the death of the dinosaurs are poison gases, volcanic dust, meteorites, comets, sunspots, God’s will,mass suicide (like lemmings!) and wars. Utterly ridiculous is the idea that all the dinosaurs were killed off by cavemen… The last three causes that we shall mention are raids by little green hunters in flying saucers, lack of even standing room for the dinosaurs in Noah’s Ark, and sheer boredom with their prehistoric world.” – Alan Charig, “A New Look At The Dinosaurs”, p. 151 – (SHUT UP ALAN SHUT UP! I CAN’T HEAR YOU NANNY NANNY BOO BOO UR A STUPID CREATIONIST WEIRDO!)

31. "The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution." – Stephen Jay Gould (Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University), "Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging?" Paleobiology, vol. 6(1), January 1980, p. 127 (YOU CREATIONIST! STEPHEN IS A CREATIONIST EVERYONE! SHUN HIM! INSULT HIM! HAHAHA STEPHEN IS DUMB! YOU HIGHEST ORDER OF A WHACK JOB! UR NOT EVOLVED!HAH HAH EVERYONE STEPHEN ISN’T EVOLVVVED. WE DARWINISTS ARE MORE EVOLVED THEN HIM! HE’S JUST A, HAHA – I’M SO FUNNY, LISTEN TO THIS: A HIGHEST ORDER WHACK JOB EVERYONE! HAHAHA I’M SO CLEVER AND COOL, MY JOKES ARE SO COOL AND NEAT AND SMARTY! I’M A COOL PERSON, DEFINITELY NOT A DUMB EMPTY-HEADED NERD LOSER UNFUNNY IDIOT WHO CALLS HIMSELF "DAWDLER"!)

32. "Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory." – Ronald R. West, PhD (paleoecology and geology) (Assistant Professor of Paleobiology at Kansas State University), "Paleoecology and uniformitarianism". Compass, vol. 45, May 1968, p. 216 (LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!)

33. "The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that ‘a tornado sweeping through a junk yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein’." – Sir Fred Hoyle (English astronomer, Professor of Astronomy at Cambridge University), as quoted in "Hoyle on Evolution". Nature, vol. 294, 12 Nov. 1981, p. 105 (SHUT UP YOU CREATIONIST!)

34. "Echoing the criticism made of his father’s habilis skulls, he added that Lucy’s skull was so incomplete that most of it was ‘imagination made of plaster of Paris’, thus making it impossible to draw any firm conclusion about what species she belonged to." – Referring to comments made by Richard Leakey (Director of National Museums of Kenya) in The Weekend Australian, 7-8 May 1983, Magazine, p. 3 (RICHARD IS A CREATIONIST! DON’T BELIEVE HIM!)

35. "The entire hominid collection known today would barely cover a billiard table, … the collection is so tantalizingly incomplete, and the specimens themselves often so fragmented and inconclusive, that more can be said about what is missing than about what is present. …but ever since Darwin’s work inspired the notion that fossils linking modern man and extinct ancestor would provide the most convincing proof of human evolution, preconceptions have led evidence by the nose in the study of fossil man." – John Reader, photo-journalist and author of "Missing Links", "Whatever happened to Zinjanthropus?" – New Scientist, 26 March 1981, p. 802 (NOOOO! NOT NEW SCIENTIST AGAIN! UR SUPPOSED TO BE A BRITISH DARWINIST MAGAZINE, NOT A CREATIONIST WEIRDO MAGAZINE! JUST ASK BEN DAWDLER!!!! DAMNIT NOOOO, I’M MELTING! MEEEEEEEEEELTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTING!!!)

Where is the wise? Where the scribe? Where the lawyer of this world? Did God not make the wisdom of thisworld foolish? For since in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom did not know God, God was pleased through the foolishness of preaching to save the ones believing.
And since Jews ask for a sign, and Greeks seek wisdom, we, on the other hand, preach Christ crucified (truly an offense to Jews, and foolishness to Greeks) – 1 Corinthians 1:20-23. And you sure let us millions of Christians know how much the Bible offends you, so much so you felt you had to insult me into not using it you easily annoyed, weak-minded, absurd dummy.


They set a net for my steps; my soul was bowed down. They dug a pit in my way, but they have fallen into it themselves. – Psalm 57:6

For the sin of their mouths, the words of their lips, let them be trapped in their pride. For the cursing and lies that they utter, consume them in wrath; consume them till they are no more, that they may know that God rules over Jacob to the ends of the earth. Each evening they come back, howling like dogs and prowling about the city. They wander about for food and growl if they do not get their fill. But I will sing of your strength; I will sing aloud of your steadfast love in the morning. For you have been to me a fortress and a refuge in the day of my distress. O my Strength, I will sing praises to you, for you, O God, are my fortress, the God who shows me steadfast love. – Psalm 59:12-17

Did that host of verses hurt your feelings? Are you reeling in pain, you weak-minded moron? Why moron? Why moron who pretends the Bible has done no good, and contains no truths, and that merely quoting it is a bad thing? Oh, is it juz cuz you said so? Well if Dawdler said it I believe it! Not. Don’t worry dog who hates hearing God’s word, which has never been outsold, outspread, or outdefeated by sin-lovers like you: you’ll get your fill on Judgment Day, and your time-wasting money-wasting delusions will be crushed once and for all to your eternal shame.


Looking forward to more childish boasting (like speaking for the world let alone 60+ million Calvinists as if they were atheist Darwinists who believe in Global Warming), nerdy unfunny emotionally immaturity, bitterness-revealing, insecurity-about-your-penis-revealing, jokes, more accusations and proof of global warming, macroevolution and "no God"  based on insults, mere questioning, expressions of your dumb doubt (ur special little worthless stinky feelings and that of other gullibles like yourself), opinions, mere claims, and psuedoscience, more ranting about the earth being flat, bleeding yourself as a cure-all, how hot it is right now during winterand how melting ice in Antarctica is ruining your life and making you oh so angry, contradictions, rehashed parrotted defeated "evidence" for "evolution" from 10 to 108 years ago give or take a few ever-changing figures of billion imaginary years ago (cuz ur still "learning"), and how you have no beliefs becuz ur an atheist. Cheers you time-wasting moron. Hur hur, isn’t me funny, cuz me said "Cheers" to you. See, me is smart because me used original sarcasm, me invented sarcasm "Cheers" meself, me from Birtain so me smarter too, now u must believe me is smart n’ u dumb cuz ur American n creationist. Me is Dawdler, me smart. Hur hur.

My Reply To Yet Another Atheist Moron Named “Dawdler” Who Thinks Raging Insults Is Science

January 6, 2009 Leave a comment

(No Subject)‏
From: Ben Hall (
  Medium riskYou may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as unsafe
Sent: Mon 1/05/09 12:54 PM
To: danielknight
You are a whack-job of the highest order.
I have had a look through some of your ‘work’ and your comments on – why post on such a site if you live in the fairytale land of religion?
You are a hopeless American loser who is going nowhere.
Lets hope you shuffle off this mortal coil soon and don’t bother the rest of us with your creationist bigotry.
Looking forward to a host of biblical quotes as a response….


Super moron, that you side with a Darwinist who said evolution is "magic" shows what a super moron you are. That you insult me for my citizenship shows that it is you who is the moron of the highest order. That you side with a moron, with  morons who state as a fact what happened billions of years ago ON A SPECIFIC YEAR, SHOWS WHAT IT IS YOU WHO IS LIVING IN FANTASY LAND, YOU SUPER MORON- BIGOT.

If you really "read" my posts then how di you miss that I repeatedly pointed out that mere claims and insults are not evidence, you dumb moron? If you "read" my posts then why are you angry that I rebuked moron Darwinists like yourself for speaking for 60+ million Calvinists, you moron? Get a le you self-pushing idiot who pretends to care for the truth merely so he can enjoy arguing and hating those who are good. And as I say all the time to idiots like you, and said in one of my posts, USE A DICTIONARY MORON, IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE WORDS LIKE SCIENCE, YOU IDIOT, LEARN WHAT IT MEANS AND STOP ACCUSING THE GOOD OF THE EVIL YOU DO. The one  living in a fantasy world is clearly you, and the non-comformists like me, a "weirdo" for not being a dumb parroting slave like you, will never stop loving God to make reality-haters like you happy. We already have God you moron, get a life and stop pushing yourself on us you airhead.

As for going no where, moron, I’ve lead over 100 people to Christ, have saved lives, and have repeatedly refuted hate-loving ignorance-loving parasite-morons like you for years.

Happy so upset your evil fantasy you global warming ranting dawdling moron, and God  bless you.


LOL! I just notice this dumb part of Dawdlers rant after posting and editing my response:

"Looking forward to a host of biblical quotes as a response…."

Moron, the Bible is free, the most widely available book, and book translated into the most languages, and you, a moron, need me to quote it for you? DUR? SUPER MORON? Haven’t you already read it yet moron? If you had carefully read it moron, then you wouldn’t be looking forward to any quotes from it idiot, because you’d already know why you were wrong to insult God and I you moron. Clearly you haven’t read it carefully, if at all, so what then is your excuse for arguing against it you silly air-headed idiot? DUR?


FURTHERMORE MORON  SINCE WHEN DOES ANYONE NEED TO QUOTE THE BIBLE TO POINT OUT TO MORONS LIKE YOU THAT THE UNIVERSE IS DESIGNED AS ARE THE LIVING THINGS IN IT AND THEREFORE ARE NOT CREATED BY CHANCE? DUR? OBVIOUSLY LIVING THINGS HAVE A DESIGN, YOU BLIND  MORON FANTASY-LOVING IDIOT. AND WHAT WOULD BE WRONG WITH QUOTING THE TRUTH ANYWAYS IDIOT? TRUTHS THAT HAVE BEEN OUTSELLING YOUR ATHEIST RANTS FOR DECADES? What a dumb stupid idiot you are, what a little kid you are, to think that using "reverse psychology" and insulting rhetoric to get me to NOT quote the Bible to refute you, and implying that using it is all I can do, will KEEP ME FROM QUOTING IT! NO YOU MORON, I WILL QUOTE IT ALL THE MORE TO REFUTE YOU YOU REALITY-HATING GOON. But first, how about reading quotes from reality-hating goons just like yourself  you moron, you moron who PRETENDED that all creationists do is use the Bible, who pretends because he’s AFRAID THAT HEARING GOD WILL MAKE HIM FEEL EVEN WORSE ABOUT HIS IDIOT SELF):


High Weirdeness As Evidence for God

January 8, 2008 Leave a comment

I was watching Fraggle Rock cartoons yesterday, then while looking up info on a invention salesmen named Dennis Lee just now found a Wikipedia article on “Dennis Lee” ” but it turns out to be another Dennis Lee who wrote the lyrics to the Fraggle Rock intro theme.

I found a news article recently showing that Global Warming scare mongers ripped off over $2 billion from poor countries while simultaneously making the whole world worse according to certain of their like-minded scientists. On top of that, these scientists had been warning them that they would make things worse or were for years. That just goes to show how sick these global warmers are.