Archive

Posts Tagged ‘science fraud’

Senator Bernie Sanders, Out of Touch Liberal Voted Against August 2nd Debt Ceiling Bill


Senator Bernie Sanders, helping the Jews, liberals and socialists to look bad

About 2 hours ago I listened to Bernie Sanders, a junior senator from Vermont, and one of SEVEN senators who voted to keep funding the infamous A.C.O.R.N. AFTER it was exposed), said on CNN today, sometime around 3 PM I think, why he voted AGAINST the debt deal that Obama recently signed to raise the debt ceiling. He said, to my amazement, that it was because it would cut hundreds of thousands of police and EVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION jobs, and a few others including fire protection. Did he say police and environmental protection!? Dead give away of a liberal when you mention environmental protection, and shows an out-of-touch person when you say police, as if whatever American police anywhere simply make things better (just like democrats Bernie probably thinks does us good, he probably thinks it would also be a tragedy if the TSA also lost their jobs). Bernie claims that he is a democratic socialist, big surprise. He also said on CNN at that time that the citizens who were calling him were making known to him that they were mainly worried if they would be getting their social security checks, able to send their kids to college (anyone heard about the student loan scam that the government involved itself in yet?) and if they would get their meal-on-wheels. When asked if the default would have been disastrous, he said, “yes”, but also said before that the deal was negotiable, but mentioned that so was social security being cancelled. But, despite it being negotiable, and up against the day of default, Bernie said he voted against the deal. Who elected this person and why is he still in office? Does Bernie know yet the terrible actions of the EPA, like promoting fluoride in the public water supply? Does he know that fluoride is harmful to human cells and bone?

Days after terrorists brought down the World Trade Center towers, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the air was safe to breathe, but that proved to be a dangerously optimistic assessment. Nearly two years later, EPA’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) reported that the EPA “did not have sufficient data and analyses to make such a blanket statement,” as “air monitoring data was lacking for several pollutants of concern.” – Source

If not, why not? Truly liberals are destroying the country.

References:

latest in a long line of bogus assaults on dioxin
Is [the] EPA ready for the truth about dioxin?
Vanishing Act [of the EPA]
EPA Ignores Advisers On Particulate Matter Standards
EPA Takes a Lax Approach to E-Waste Monitoring, GAO Report Finds
EPA’s Failure To Publicize Drinking Water Data Prompts Agency, Congress To Rethink Policies
EPA’s New Particulate Matter Standards Fail To Protect Public Health
EPA Fails to address Chemical Evaluation Problems
Farm Bureau Sues EPA Over Chesapeake Bay Cleanup
Home builders group sues EPA over new Chesapeake Bay pollution regulations
Corruption and Fraud at the EPA
Investigatiion of Corruption of Science Panels at EPA
Warning: This bill [on the National Uniformity for Foods Act] could make you sickEnvironmentalist Corruption: EPA funds Green Groups That Sue the Government
The EPA Versus the USA
Dow’s Toxic Legacy Of EPA Corruption
The Case Against Fluoride
Hobbes’ Mistake – The Rational Case For Anarchy

The Great Gravity Probe B Hoax: More Evolutionist (Anti-Christian) Fraud

May 13, 2011 1 comment

Sadly, evolutionists have further wrecked science, spreading more lies in the astronomy field, spreading more confusion and causing more scientific and technological stagnation and religious/spiritual confusion as a result. They have done so this time by making false claims about the Gravity Probe B satellite experiment, which in 2008 NASA had made clear was a failed experiment. But now, in March 2011, it’s suddenly a success. Look at how much propaganda was spread by the experimenters:

78 news articles claiming that the GPBSE was a success, and many blogs, including Michio Kaku’s.

Even Wikipedia is spreading the hoax which is evident from the title of the Gravity Probe B experiment picture they placed on the Gravity Probe B page. It says, “Gravity_Probe_B_Confirms_the_Existence_of_Gravitomagnetism.jpg” (the same picture I used for this post). I wonder if that was the original title or if some weasel retitled it.

At this Google knol link here, physics researcher Michael Suede points out why the claim of success and vindication is false, among other reasons for Relativity being false. He claims that the GPB error data was used to produce a positive result, which the geocentrist Malcom Bowden predicted would happen.

If you hate reading or would rather watch videos of evidence against General Relativity, here are some videos on Youtube:

Einstein Was Wrong – Falsifying Observational Evidence Presented

Quasars: Why Einstein Was Wrong

Related Videos and Articles:

Geoncentrism Evidence:

Hidden scientific evidence for geocentrism

Evidence of Geocentrism 1 of 3

Evidence of Geocentrism 2 of 3

Evidence of Geocentrism 3 of 3

Geocentricism – The Orrery

The geocentric Venus-Mars-cycle – animation

Earth, Venus, Sun: Geocentric Orrery

Geocentric Model with Sun and Venus

Geocentric model of the solar system, demonstrating the celestial sphere and epicycles

Morning Meteors Explain Geocentrism

Geocentricity – Satellites + Mach

GEOCENTRISM – Sagnac’s experiment – an animated explanation

Geocentricity explains the seasons

The Static Earth – The Geostationary Model works!

Geocentric Universe – Celestial Poles

GEOCENTRICITY – An animated explanation of “Airy’s Failure”

Galileo – Quadricentennial Myth vs fact

A written rebuttal against the arguments of Los Almos’ Nieto’s arguments against geocentrism

Big Bang Contradictions:

Technical Paper on Plasma Cosmology and Big Bang

The Big Bang Theory–A Scientific Critique

Fast stars challenge big bang origin for dwarf galaxies

Why we’ve got the cosmological constant all wrong (note the comments too)

New Discovery: Dwarf Galaxies May Nix Theory of Dark Matter in the Universe

Faster Than Light? Neutrino Finding Puzzles Scientists

Faster than a Speeding Light Wave

The First Test That Proves General Theory of Relativity Wrong

Was the Speed of Light Faster In the Early Universe?

Faster Than the Speed of Light: The Story of a Scientific Speculation

Speed of Light May Have Varied in the Early Universe

Copernicus and his Revolutions

The Decrease In the Speed of Light – An Update On Developments

Reports of the Death of Speed of Light Decay are Premature

On the Constancy of the Speed of Light

Starlight and Time

Categories: Astronomy, evolution propaganda, evolution propaganda, Physics Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lying About Loch Fossils: Mainstream Science Cult Lies Again

April 14, 2011 1 comment

Post link: http://lochfossils.tk

More sickening propaganda and greed come from the Mainstream Science Cult news source Sciencedaily:

Loch Fossils Show Life Harnessed Sun and Sex Early on [because the greedy cultists said so]

ScienceDaily (Apr. 14, 2011) — Remote lochs along the west coast of Scotland are turning up new evidence about the origins of life on land [because the greedy cultists said so].

A team of scientists from the University of Sheffield, the University of Oxford and Boston College [grant money grubbers], who are exploring rocks around Loch Torridon, have discovered the remarkably preserved remains [evidence of a 6,500 Earth, not “billions and billions of years old”] of organisms that once lived on the bottom of ancient lake beds as long as a billion (1,000 million) years ago [because the greedy cultists said so].

These fossils illuminate a key moment in the history of evolution when life made the —-> leap <—- [weasel word] from tiny, simple bacterial [because the greedy cultists said so, show the evidence, liars] (prokaryote) [oh look they used a “science” word kids and morons, so they must be smart n’ wise n trustworthy, they must know what they’re talking about!, not those dummy wummy fundie Kwistins] cells towards larger, more complex (eukaryotic) [more complex means it must have evolved from less because the greedy cultists said so: it’s logical fallacy to make such a claim] cells which would make photosynthesis and sexual reproduction possible [because the greedy cultists said so]. The findings are reported in the journal Nature.

Some of these ancient fossils are so finely ornamented, and so large and complex, that they are evidence for a surprisingly early start for the emergence of complex eukaryote cells on land [HUH?! SO THE EARLIER YOU FIND A COMPLEX ORGANISM THE “MORE RIGHTER WE ARE YOU FUNDIES!” HUUUUUUUUUUUUH!!!!???????????!?!?!?!!? NO SUPER MORON LIARS: THAT’S MORE EVIDENCE THAT BIBLE, GOD’S WORD IS RIGHT, NO YOUR LIE THAT EARLIER = MORE SIMPLE.] The researchers believe that it was from complex cells such as these that green algae and green land plants — everything from lettuce to larch trees — were able to evolve and colonise the land [Sure the cultists do. Just like Mormons don’t doubt their religion when their leaders have them shun learning anything outside of their religion that shows it to be false]. – Source

Well, so much for the “skeptics'” claims that ancient bacteria can’t survive after millions of years, let alone a million. This article didn’t even mention how “skeptics” can’t believe or are “skeptical” that it’s possible for life or even DNA to last that long (yes: it is really unlikely if Earth was billions of years old, let alone a million or millions, right, Mainstream Science Cult and supporters?) I wonder why it’s not mentioned? Could it be because it would make Mainstreamers and their Skeptic sect look anti-scientific, because it would kill the excitement of the story, because it would make it look like Skeptics, which many Mainstreamers claim to be, like hinderers of science, or because it might provoke thought outside of the tiny mental box they try to trap everyone in? Because it might get the thoughtless to lift up their blinders and peek at the things in the light, and try to make out what they are seeing clearly? Can’t have that can we cultists? Thinking for yourself is a sin to cultists.

So, let’s get this lesson clear kids and morons: According to the Mainstreamers, the “earlier” a life form existed, the more simple, but if it’s complex [contradiction], the Darwin Cult of Mainstreamers are still right, cuz its just means like got complex suddenly, and the “earlier” a complex form of life is found, the more sudden it happened, and the later a simpler life form is found, it must not have evolved, or come from something simpler, because complex things only get more complex, never simpler, just like this circular reasoning.”

Anti-Christians and Mainstream Science Cult: Please stop teaching kids and morons bad logic, please stop wasting time and money by promoting lies with your time and the money God allows you to have and use. Please, it’s sickening, and inviting pain and death when you keep stealing, provoking, lying and hiding the truth and wrecking lives and wasting everyone’s time.

Categories: creation science, creationism, Mainstream Science Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why Do Evolutionists Insist On Using Strawmen and Bait and Switch Against Creationists and Fundamentalists?

Post link: http://talkorigins.tk

Written in response to an essay by Jorge A Fernandez entitled “Talk.Origins: Deception by Omission”:

Why Do Creationists Insist on Linking Abiogenesis and Evolution?
One of the problems that Christian fundamentalists (specifically Biblical literalists) have in dealing with biologists who say “Evolutionary biology and abiogenesis are two different topics” is that they have no answer.

And why do fundamentalist evolutionists insist on using over-generalizations and strawmen attacks on creationists like that? Even a moron could type “abiogenesis problems” in a search engine and find articles by ICR and AIG treating them as separate, and hundreds of others.

And what hypocrisy:

In Talk.Orgins’ pre-feedback rules, it says:

Understand that abusive, inflammatory, and willfully dishonest statements, as well as cowardly anonymity (e.g., bogus email addresses), lend no credibility to one’s position.

And yet childish jabs at fundamentalists like the screed above are accept by the Talk.Orgins cult? What did you do take a survey on fundamentalists Jorge? So you said, “Hey you who say abiogenesis is impossible and therefore evolution, are you a fundie?”

Being that Talk.Origins doesn’t obey it’s own hypocritical rules (and by the way where did you get those rules? Did you just magically come up with them on their own, or could CHRISTIANITY HAVE POSSIBLY INFLUENCED THOSE ARBITRARY RULES? YOU KNOW: LIKE, OH: “DO TO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO TO YOU”? OR, “DON’T LIE,” “DON’T MURDER,” “DON’T ENDANGER THE LIFE OF YOUR NEIGHBOR,” OR “LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.” OR HOW ABOUT, “DON’T EXCHANGE REVILING FOR REVILING”? You are blind credit thieving hypocrites, just like your father Satan.

But here’s an answer for you stereotyping moron: “IF LIFE CREATED BY RANDOM CHANCE ISN’T POSSIBLE, THEN HOW THE HELL IS ONE ANIMAL TURNING INTO ANOTHER BY RANDOM CHANCE? WHICH IS HARDER: THE CREATION OF MULTI-EMOTIONAL, SENTIENT, REPRODUCING (IN MULTIPLE WAYS) LIVING THINGS, THAT ARE BORN KNOWING HOW TO EAT AND REPRODUCE AND SURVIVE, BY RANDOM CHANCE, BY STILL UNKNOWN MEANS, OR, AFTERWARDS, WHEN ALL THAT MAGIC IS ACCOMPLISHED, A LITTLE ROUND BACTERIA TURNING INTO A LONG ONE WITH A DIFFERENT CELL WALL AN MORE ARMS?

And why do evolutionists keep insisting on pretending “evolution” only means one thing, and so committing the logical fallacy of ambiguity by doing so and setting up, in your willful bigotry, the same old strawman argument of “Creationists say evolution is wrong” against us? MACRO AND MICRO EVOLUTION ARE NOT THE SAME THINGS. HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU NEED TO BE TOLD THAT YOU PSYCHOPATHS?

And why do evolutionist keep insisting on associating CREATIONISTS AND FUNDAMENTALIST CHRISTIANS when they attack creationists? What a big “Ooops, oh yeah, we, forgot we do that all the time.” And why do Darwinists insist on calling fundamentalists “biblical literalists”? Evil morons: can you stop misdefining fundamentalism and pretending we believe a multihorned monster is going to come out of the sea with a whore riding on it with a crown on her head, you conniving ignorant arrogant morons who hate to be called what you are? Do you love the fallacy of ambiguity much? Love using weasel words much? Love bait and switch much? Bigoted much? Discriminate much? Block science much? Hypocrites much? So much for your CREDibility and love. What you love to do is argue in your lazy mindedness towards the truth and hatred towards God.

And please: stop the avoidance game already: IT IS YOU, WHO HAVE NO ANSWER. NO ANSWER FOR THAT PRACTICE AND NO ANSWER FOR WHERE THE EVIDENCE FOR ABIOGENESIS, “EVOLUTION”, OR YOUR BIG DEFLATED BANG. You have, NO TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS. IT’S YOU WHO WORSHIP A GOD OF THE GAPS. We do have an ever increasing amount of living fossils though, including bacteria that “skeptics” insist can’t be real even when their own scientist kin find them in “millions of years old” rocks, tar, animal stomachs and ice. I wonder why they just can’t believe it? I wonder. Not: BECAUSE THE “MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD BACTERIA” ARE VERY LITTLE DIFFERENT THEN THEIR MODERN ANCESTORS. And of course, they know their enemies, the real scientists, the fundamentalists and creationists, will point that out. So no evidence against their God of the Gaps Trinity: Big Bang God, Magic Puddle of Spontaneously Generated Life From Whatever Soup God and Magical Animals God,which forms the “Flying Spaghetti and Meatballs Monster” godhead, is good enough for a deluded liar who refuses to love the truth, and is only interested in rebellion.

More on the Mainstream Science cult and how these pleasure and money-addicted Mainstream morons obstructs scientific progress and causes it to stagnate and enables mass murder, even of babies: http://vainstream.tk

Ann Coulter: 10 Foot Tall Radioactive Woman From Hell (To Liberals)

March 22, 2011 1 comment

http://lowdr.tk

Why Ann Coulter Needs To Go To Fukshiheema!? DUH!
Bye Facebook Linda-Mocker Whorebockle, Credentials and Qualifications: liberal feminist woman, with advanced armored shoulder pads (by Mindy Fem Corp, sorry had to plug my Mindy, she’s so hot), researcher of Gypsies, Wiccan , Shamaness, lover of sushi, general foodie, professional top writer on science issues
3/22/2011, USA Great Britainy Greenwitch Time

Okay people, like, omg gag me with a spoon, like omg, like omg, like O, M, S, G, can you believe that blonde ditz, that dumb blonde, ugh, like, ug, that she said this stuff?: http://www.anncoulter.com

Can you believe she said high doses of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear reactor is good for you and that that is why we should all live inside of it in the Fukushima island? OMG, LAME, RETARDED, DID I SAY LAME?

That fail girl just, like, well omg like she acshually made fun of the Fukushimanese n, like, can you believe that? She said the radiation there is good for you? She pretends to be a scientists expert n like yet and doesn’t believe in Big Bangs, the Urine Miller experiments (the lighting that hits the chemicals and made living creatures which proved living life), and, she doesn’t believe in this people, like omg: EVOLUTION! Holy lolipops look, how can she even talk about science and like be one of those idiots that believes the world is 6,500 years old, like how can anyone know what happened that far back? Like duh, and yet she won’t believe what obviously happened 34 billion years ago, or millins of years of evolution? What kind of stupid Christian girl is that? Like duh of course you can know what happened 34 billion years ago, there’s so much damn evidence, just ask NASA and Telslascope Sciencetists, and the Observatationilist people who live in those white domes, I mean God they live with telelscopes and look through them all day I’d think that’s a scientist and wood know how old the universe and planet is, so how can she act like she knows about 6,500 years, which is way to long to know? Okay now if you can’t understand what I just said ur obviously not logical nor an expert in science and expertism like me. So. Oh and, look at this anti-science crap I found on the net, look old it is, like gawd, 1988? Can we say outdated and obsolete and useless and age matters so don’t date people more than 3 years out of your range cuz that makes you a pervert and pedophile and dirty old man? Ugh, must accept homosexuality and lesbianisms and bi-transgender beastialists already you modern times haters! Stop hating animals and denying them love! Ugh, haters. Well just look already at this ancient nonsense:

Radon: is a little good for you?
by Janet Raloff
10/15/1988

Risks now associated with low-dose exposures to ionizing radiation hae been extrapolated from effects seen in people exposed to high doses — generally atomic-bomb survivors, recipients of early X-rays, or workers in uranium mines. Because no one has established that there is a threshold to radiation effects — a level below which no hazard exixts — policymakers have conservatively assumed that even tiny exposures present some risk. However, controversial new radon studies in humans now challenge the no-threshold view — and even go a step further. They hint, as a few animal studies have, that it’s possible some radiation may actually be beneficial.

The studies, by Bernard Cohen at the University of Pittsburgh, compared U.S. data on average indoor-radon levels with average lung-cancer rates for the county in which each measurement was taken. According to the no-threshold theory, Cohen says, one would expect to find a trend toward higher lung-cancer rates for those counties with the highest indoor-radon averages. But to the contrary, he says, “we found there’s a strong tendency for counties that have high radon levels to have low lung-cancer rates.”

One study, representing data from 415 counties, was based on 39,000 measurements taken in the main living rooms (not basements, where readings are typically highest) of homes in which the residents had purchased their first radon test kit. Based on the radon average, a no-threshold estimate would have predicted female lung-cancer rates 25 percent higher than the national average. Instead, Cohen says, “the data show a 30 percent decrease.” Comparisons for men and women in the 10 states for which there are data on 10 or more counties give similar “negative correlations in 80 percent of the cases. And in the states where there is a positive correlation,” he adds, “it is very slight and not statistically significant.” But this study was clearly nonrandom, since it involved only homes where the residents were worried enough to pay for radon measurements. – More fake science nonsense here people of world including the Fukushimaneese!

My very intelligent commennts: What was all that stuff? So many hard words bleah. Obviosly he’s an oldieeeee. Don’t look at little girls old man! Ew!

Afraid of Radiation? Low Doses are Good for You
4/2/2004
by Donald W. Miller, Jr., MD

Fearful of the harm that radiation can do, the citizens of Sacramento, in a public referendum, had the city shut down its Rando Seco nuclear power plant. The Sacramento Municipal Utility District put up windmills instead, which on a windy day produces 1 percent of the power the nuclear plant did, and built a photovoltaic solar plant that generates one-third of one percent of that power. Eight nuclear power plants have been decommissioned in the U.S. since 1990. None ordered after 1974 were completed, and no orders have been placed for any since 1978. The 103 nuclear reactors in the U.S. that remain operational produce 7.6 percent of the nation’s energy, as electricity. There are 442 nuclear power plants worldwide, with 35 under construction — 24 of them in Asia.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NCR), two federal entities charged with addressing radiation safety, hold the view that exposure to any amount of ionizing radiation, no matter how small, is harmful. No amount of radioactivity can be proclaimed safe. Accordingly, the EPA and the NCR have set extremely stringent regulatory limits for public exposure to radiation — 15 and 100 mrem (millirem)/year respectively. This is the level of cleanup radioactive sites have to achieve, for example, before they can be released for public use. The initial limit for radiation exposure was 36 rem (36,000 mrem). With the advent of nuclear-powered ships, where sailors would be in close proximity to nuclear reactors for extended periods of time, it was though prudent to reduce it to15 rem, even though no deaths or injuries were documented under the 36-rem protection limit. (For practical purposes, rad, rem, Sievert, and Grey are interchangeable measures of radiation, where 1 rad = 1 rem, 1 Sievert = 1 Grey, and 100 rad or rem = 1 Sievert or Grey. A millirem — mrem — is 1/1000th of a rem.)

Along with the EPA and NRC, elected government officials, newspaper science writers, TV reporters and journalists, and, consequently, most Americans believe that low doses of radiation are harmful. People have “radiophobia” — the fear that any level of ionizing radiation, no matter how small, is dangerous. Why? For one thing, the news media fosters it because fear sells. Scary stories about the dangers of radiation keep people tuned in. Another reason, which lies deeper in the collective psyche, is that this phobia expresses the deep-seated sense of revulsion that Americans feel over the devastation and loss of life caused by the atomic bombs that its country dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II. A third, more correctable reason is that the relationship between radiation dose and its biological effects is believed to conform to the “Linear (No-Threshold) Hypothesis,” or “model.” Regulators use this model to predict the number of cancer deaths that low doses of radiation are assumed to cause and then cite these predictions to justify their draconian radiation safety standards. – More here

My comentts: Whats an MD? A monster dummy? Probably. And wow like 2004? keep up with the times monster head! And OMG so many words! Wow I didn’t ask for a book! Who even has time to read all that stuff: BORING! SEX SEX SEX! ABORTION COUPONS FOR CHRISTMAS AND EVERY DAY FOREVER!

Ok next stupid babble! from conservatives!:

Low Dose Radiation Evades Cancer Cells’ Protective ‘Radar’
ScienceDaily <— OMG FAKE JUNKSCIENCE SITE OBVIOUSLY!
11/6/2004
A new study shows that lower doses of radiation elude a damage detection “radar” in DNA and actually kill more cancer cells than high-dose radiation. With these findings, scientists believe they can design therapy to dismantle this “radar” sensor allowing more radiation to evade detection and destroy even greater numbers of cancer cells.

Researchers at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center tested the low-dose radiation strategy on cultured prostate and colon cancer cell lines and found that it killed up to twice as many cells as high-dose radiation. The extra lethality of the low-dose regimen was found to result from suppression of a protein, called ATM* which works like a radar to detect DNA damage and begin repair.

Theodore DeWeese, M.D., who led the study, speculates that cells hit with small amounts of radiation fail to switch on the ATM radar, which prevents an error-prone repair process. DeWeese, who will present his evidence at the annual meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology on October 5 in Atlanta, explains.

“DNA repair is not foolproof – it can lead to mistakes or mutations that are passed down to other generations of cells,” explains DeWeese, chairman of the Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences at Johns Hopkins. “A dead cell is better than a mutant cell, so if the damage is mild, cells die instead of risking repair.”

Higher doses of radiation cause extreme DNA damage and widespread cell death, so the ATM damage sensor is activated to preserve as many cells as possible, protecting, ironically, the cancer cells under target for destruction by the radiation. – More here

My comments: RANT. Wtfrag is “DNA”? So wow, this is “science”, uh “really” “um” “I” “don’t” “think” “so”. “Science”daily “my” perfect bi-bunny “ass”! LOL LOL LOL RFLLOAMA FLAMAOAF! OVF! ASLKCJASDKJASDKJ! FOO! OMG!

OMG OMG JUNK SCIENCE ALERT JUNK SCIENCE ALERT!: http://radiationhormesis.com OMG MAKING FUN OF HOMOSEXUALS?! IT’S NOT HORMESIS IT’S HOMOSEXUALS! HE CAN’T EVEN SPELL HOMOSEXUALS RIGHT WHEN HE MAKES FUN OF THEM!!!! STUPID FUNDIE!!!!!

And omg what’s this? garbage? Why is google supporting these fake science sites?! WHO EVEN HAS TIME TO READ ALL THAT “RESEARCH” AND “THEORIES” AND UGH!:

OMG ust look at how much of this silly old junky science stuff is: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=pzB&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&prmdo=1&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A10%2F4%2F1981%2Ccd_max%3A3%2F6%2F2006&q=%2B%22low+dose+radiation+therapy%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=f&oq=

AND O M GEEEEE: LOOK THIS BOOK EXPOSES FAKE SCIENCE!: http://amzn.to/lowdr SEE WE LIBERALS ARE RIGHT DDT AND RADIATION KILLS! DO U WANT TO BE MURDERERS LIKE THE CHRISTIANS WHO BURNED 10 MILLION WITCHES IN THE BURNING TIMES OR THE CHRISTIAN HYPOCRITES THAT KILLED 1 MILLION WITCHES IN THE SALEM WITCH TRIALS!???? IF U DO UR A MURDERER! WHAT DID THOSE 1 MILLION WITCHES DO WRONG OR THE 10 MILLION?! HUH? NOTHING THEY WERE JUST PRACTICING THEIR PEACEFUL NATURE WORSHIP AND LOVING THE GODESSESS AND GIVING OUT HERBS TO HELP HEAL HURT DEER AND HERMITS! LEAVE US ALOOOOOOOOOONE! HAVEN’T U DONE ENOUGH DAMAGE CHRISTIAN HYPOCRITES! STOP BEATING UR WIVES AND HITTING UR KIDS!!!!!!!!! THOU SHALT NOT HARM! DO NOT HARM! DO AS THOU WILT BUT HARM YE NONE! NOT: STONE UR KIDS IF THEY REBEL AGAINST UR PATRIARCHY GOD! HYPOCRITE CHRISITIANS! YOU WANT TO BURN ME DON’T YOU! YOU KNOW U DO U HYPOCRITE HATEFUL HEARTS!

I hate you Ann Coulter you homophobe anti-feminissms hater! HAHA I WIN. FAIL, FAIL, FAIL! FAKE!

So many kooks n crazie old peoples out there! OMG I’M SO AFRAID. I’M PUTTING A BAG OVER MY HEAD SO OLD VIOLENT PERVERTED STRANGERS WITH CANDY WON’T MOLEST AND RAPE ME! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!! ANNE COULTER IS CRAZY! Yeah.

KEYWORDS: WHY ANN COULTER IS A DUMMY! I win! Facebook Linda-Mocker Whorbockle is winning! liberals can’t fail, Facebook Linda-Mocker Whorbockle is a genius, Facebook Linda-Mocker Whorbockle went to college, Facebook Linda-Mocker Whorbockle has a cute bf, Facebook Linda-Mocker Whorbockle has a cute gf, HAHA! I’m s beautiful and Ann is still a virgin! I’m rich! Poor people haha!

MORE KEYWORDS FOR GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE: So much for Ann Coulter being an “expert scientist” like oh yeah that’s “science theory” to say radiation is good. Ugh. Conservamtives fail. HAHA THEY ARE RED SKINNED AND FAT HAH. Conservatives are psyhopaths with no consiunce. I think I spelled cnservatives right this time. Bleah. Who cares. My bf is so hot. He owns me : )

You can’t have me oldies, I’m hot!

Oh yeah shout out to my friend in Hawaii Miss Luscious Lucy, haha she’s going to so be the next Lady Gaga. Lady Gaga rules! Hahah! I love you MJ even though ur dead and there’s no Heaven or sky daddies! But if there is it’s probably like a Wiccan one and so if u can hear me I love u, hope u reincarnate as yourself again okay? Bye Michael Jackson u were the best singer!

Please note, (See:): This was peer reviewed by my spirit guide MJ (MJ’s sweet doppleganger which is a twin spirit of energy and love) also by my friend Mindy of Mindy’s Shirts and Designs! She loves science!!!!!

Why Ann Coulter Is Wrong!?
(polls)

BYE RADIATIONS BITCH FROM HELL : )

YOU’LL NEVER BEAT US! WE HAVE GAY POWER ON OUR SIDE! PROUD TO BE BISEXUAL! STOP STEREOTYPING LIBERALS! PHOBE! OK, I’m done. No to play Grand Theft Auto with my lil bro for another 23 hours while getting drunk hee hee. Science rules! Keep your religion out of it fundies!: IT’S NOT YOUR WORLD! WE WITCHES WERE HERE FIRST! JUST ASK ARCHEOLOGISTS AND EVOLUTIONISTS AND AFROPOLOGISTS! OH AND ASTRONOMMERS, THE ONES WHO MAKE TELESCOPES! DUH! BLIND BITCH! YOU OBVIOUSLY JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND SCIENCE ANN MY DEAR! QUACK! CRACKPOT! LOONY! KOOK! CRAZY PERSON! GET MEDS UR BIPOLAR AND SYCKO!

Oh yeah people tommorrow my lil bro has to get chemotherapy or i think it’s acshually called chemicaltherapy, it’s not radiative deadly particles like from Fumkushima that Ann Coulter wants us to take baths in, so, so use our combined consciousness powers of positive wishful thinking that it will work okay people (not talking to you fundies, no one needs you)? the radiation kills the cancer, k? Oh also use your positive intentions I get the Ferrari I want!

UPDATE: OMG OMG OMG UPDATE PEOPLE!:

ON FACEBOOK I FOUND THIS AWESOME SCIENTIFIC COMMENT FROM A LIBERAL FRIEND!:

“Ruprecht Rogers
“NUCLEAR RADIATION: IT DOES A BODY GOOD” or “Ann Coullter’s Latest Batsh#t Rant” – MORE HERE!!!!

OMG HE IS SO RIGHT BATSHIT IS TERRIBLE PEOPLE! LIBERALS ARE SO SMART!!! BAT POOP IT’S SO BAD FOR PLANTS AND TREES TOTALLY WORTHLESS AND SICKENING EEEEEEW. IT’S SO STUPID! BATSHIT IS WORTHLESS JUST LIKE FUNDIES AND THEIR KIDS AND BABIES AND BABIES THAT SHUDE BE ABORTED AND UM, ALSO, UM, WAIT WHAT WAS I THINKING? OH YEAH GLOBAL WARMING! STOP IT FUNDIES YOU’RE MAKING THE EARTH HOT! STOP THE CARBON DIOXIDE FROM GETTING INTO PLANTS IT’S KILLING THEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! UR HURTING THE PLANET FUNDIES AND THE CUTE ANIMALS IN IT!!!!!!! NOOOO I LOVE CAAAAAAAAAAAAATS!!!! STOP IIIIIIIIIIT!!!! : (

KILL BATS INSTEAD CAUSE THEIR BAT POOPS ARE GETTING ALL OVER THE PLACE AND MAKING GERMS AND IT KILLS PLANTS FROM THE POOP AND GERMS IN IT! IT’S FILTHY! POOP IS NOT CLEAN PEOPLE IT’S SUPPOSED TO GET FLUSHED INTO THE TOILET AND GO INTO LARGE HOLES IN THE GROUND THAT GO REALLY DEEP AND SO NO ONE EVER DRINKS OR TOUCHES IT OKAY? Don’t play with bat poop okay people? It’s worthless, throw it away and um, oh yeah so use ur intentions to get me a Ferrari okay!!!!? THAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANKS!

UPDATES : (

OMG I THINK I FEEL SICK FROM THE FOODIEISHIMA’S RADIATION : (

SOMEONE HELPS ME PLEASE GIVE ME THOSE BROWN PILLS UM, IDONINE? IODINE? I DUNNO BUT I NEED THEM, MY THYROID HURTS : ((((((

STUPID FUMISHIMA PEOPLE! I WISH YOU WOULD ALL GO LIVE IN FUMISHIMA BECAUSE OF HOW UR MAKING ME FEEL RIGHT NOW! THIS IS GOING TO LIKE, RUIN MY DAY : (

I LIKE THEIR SUSHI THO. OKAY SO I GUESS IT BACK BCUZ OF THE SUSHI? SORRY PEOPLE. IT’S THE RADIATIONS PARTICULES IN THE AIR : (

LETS COMBINE OUR INTENTIONS TO MAKE THEM BLOW AWAY OKAY? LOVE YOU BYEEEE {{{{{{{{{{{{{HUGZ – LIBERALISSSSSM LBGT LOVEEEEEEEE}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

FIGHT THE AIDS EPIDEMIC IN THE USA IT’S KILLING US ALL AND THE WEATHER FROM CHANGINGGGGGGG!!!!! (omg i hate the cold! beautifil bf please hug me and keep me warm! : )

UPDATE 3/23/2001!!!!:

UPDATE!: OMG I LOST MY BOX OF CONDUMS!!!!! I CAN’T BE GUILTY OF OVERPOPULATION OF THIS WORLD! OF MOTHER GAYA! OMGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! PLEASE USE UR INTENTION EXPERIMENTS SO I CAN’T HELP USE UP THE PEAK OIL WITH MORE BABIES!!!!!!!!!! I HATE HAVING ABORTIONS!!! Wait… I like women better anyways, never mind people. Omg… I feel, like I can’t breath n like i have no room to walk, OMGGGGGGGGGGGGGG OVERPOPULATTTTTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIONNNNNN!!!!! STOP OVERPOPULATING THE PLANET FUNDIES!!!!!! ABORT YOUR BABIES!!!!! KILL THEM EVEN IF IT’S LIKE ABOUT TO COME OUT!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!! I CAN’T BREAAAATHE!!!!! OMGGGGG MY SPLEEEEN! MY SPLEEN HURTS :(

wait, oh that’s just my box of condumns in my pocket sorry! YAAAAY, I CAN HAVE SEX WITH MORE GUYS AGAAAAIN HEEE HEEE! Wait… I can’t even have kids anyways I’m a guy, but what if I evolve?!

OMG I THINK I FEEL TSUNAMI! OMG I BETTER FIND SOLAR PANEL AS A RAFT SO I CAN HAVE POWER FOR MY IPOD!!!!!!!!! OMGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!

——————————–!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!———————————-

EXTREME UPDATE ALERT FOR THE PEOPLE OF THIS EARTH

NOT THE ONES IN PARALLEL UNIVERSES! AS SPECULATED ON

BY GEORGE NOORY AND OTHER HIGH METAPHYSICISTS!

I THINK THE HOLE IN THE OZONE LAYER IS GETTING…

BIGGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WAIT… OMG, OH, MY, GOD…. OHMYGOD… I WAS USING

HAIRSPRAY TODAY!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

I’M SO SORRY MOTHER GAYA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I FROGOT IT HAD TOXIC CFCS IN IT THAT HARM

GOLDEN POISON ARROW FROGS AND THE YOUR

OZONE HOLE!!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

{{{{FROGIVE MEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!}}}}

~Part 2!~

Categories: Health and Medicine, liberalism, radiation Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,