Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Russian politics’

Why Liberals and the Liberal MSM Hate and Attack Russia, Putin and President Trump

Why Liberals and the Liberal Media Demonize Russia, Putin and President Trump

First of all liberals oppose conservativism, and therefore Republicans, and Trump at least verbally sides with conservatives. Second, Putin and allegedly all of the government under him openly opposes homosexuals and pro homosexual speech. It’s actually against Russian law to endorse homosexuality. Now then logically Russia must oppose liberalism as all liberals support homosexuality, and many even support letting little children having homosexual sex, at least with others their age, and no doubt liberals would enjoy watching it, not many would admit it in public out of fear of coming across as perveted predatory sex-addicts who care more about their personal sexual gratification then children, or almost entirely, or, entirely about their satisfaction, as a psychopath would be like. Now, does anyone think political liberals, well-studied ones who enjoy pushing their beliefs, their faith, their philosphies of men on others will simply sit quietly and let Putin and his conservative anti-gay government who view (at least claim to view) gays as mentally ill or logically confused) become influential in American politics, like tolerate the possibility that some part of the Russian government tried to get a spiritually and morally similar or preferable (at least as far as they could tell) president elected, especially if the opposition candidate was liberal and barely lost by a few votes? Especially if they thought Russia helped to demonize that candidate? Of course, with the tons and tons of wealthy busy-body, gossip-hungry, strife-loving liberals in America they’d counter attack, they’d look for holes in Trump’s armor, try and take him down. Personally and as a true Christian, I oppose conservatism and liberalism as both are anti-Biblical philosophies. I oppose the conservatism of the type of the corrupt hypocrite, Freemason, deist, two-faced, man-fearing, founding fathers because they sanction liberal speech, or at least they claimed to, as do their cult followers called “Constitutionalists” and conservatives. How the humans act who claim to uphold those laws isn’t necessarily going to be in obedience.

That is why CNN.com today said Russia has a “hostile” government, a misleading lie, a deception. It’s HOSTILE TO LIBERALISM AND LIBERALS and by extension to atheists, which is ironic as Russia used to be atheist dominated. Liberals play the same word game propaganda endorsing liberalism in sneaky ways by demonizing creationists and Bible-obeying Christians by promoting so called “mainstream science” meaning pro-atheist science, a scientific philosophy not based on science that denies Biblical creationism and the need to worship SOLEY the God of the Bible or alternatively, any “God” or god at all. The Bible strongly warns against Christians allowing godlessness in the church, but to instead make sure their children are at least theistic. That’s really what this is about: liberals opposing traditional anti-homosexual, monotheistic Christianity. So then one must wonder why then do liberals support Islam, which is also monotheistic (in a wrong way) and anri-homosexual? Because, the smarter liberals think or did think they could turn these “stupid” Muslims to their side by welcoming them, perhaps also because some liberals found out many Muslims were pro homosexual child-sex lovers and engaged in it but also for a more malicious reason, that being that many Muslims are militant and willing to blow up their enemies (Christians, some liberals think, are their main enemies) and therefore could help kill the “worst” Christians like Pat Robertson and others. Tbe problem: Some militant Muslims must believe if they truly know the Quran and believe it, that “Christians are the closest (you Muslims) have to friends”, which is basically a verse in the Quran. It’s not talking about liberal Christians, but Catholics (that’s all Mohammed knew of in his experience, not Calvinists or Lutherans). So, of course, some Muslims would first attack liberals, like ones in a gay club, not Christian churches first. Think: would a Muslim want to attack first fellow worshipers of God with the good ten commandments, or atheists and “the immoral”, the “lawless” liberals who despise traditional Christian and the similar Islamic morals? But liberals being severely chaotic inside and blind often reject the obvious and do what is stupid, childish and against common sense, severely, so they end up being blown up by the dogs and swine they want to partner with or befriend. Befriending scorpions and venomous snakes is not wise. So, elite liberals in politics who enjoy manipulating and attacking anti-liberals are trying to turn two conservative governments (the US partially conservative) from joining forces and even becoming a single government in the future perhaps which may crush liberals. That, is what this is about. It’s not about liberals wanting justice or fairness or caring about treason or if Obama was really a citizen of the USA or not, but their feelings and philosophy, their point of view not being trashed, and ultimately, their hatred of God.

Now, someone may ask me, “whose side are you on if you are against attacking LGBTQs and persecuting them by saying, ‘Libs hate God'”?

1. Am I not allowed my own opinion whether political, religious or philosophical? May I even dare to believe I have factual reality-based beliefs or must I only side exactly with you or some group which often cannot even entirely agree amongst themselves. For example how many LGBTQs agree on calling people “queer” or gender neutral people? Many insist that’s a biologal impossibility and unscientific.

2. I specifically referred to elite liberals, that does not even mean LGBTQs. The “1%”ers are a very specific group.

3. Did I say I support Russia or Trump?

4. Did I say which version of God LGBTQs hate?

Make no assumptions about me, just as you’d like me not to do to you.

 

Advertisements