Yesterday night George featured the medium Mary Ann Winkowski. She is used, sadly, but not surprisingly, by the FBI. George allowed people to call in and ask her questions, and she was asked if she believed in the Bible, and she said that she did, and the same caller then told her that the Bible said that “the dead know nothing”, and said that Satan likes to play tricks, but she dismissed it, and instead of saying, “That’s not true” was disgustingly sly by instead saying that not all (human) spirits cross over, and so, negating God’s word in the next breath. A few minutes later another person called in and asked her why not all spirits cross over, and she gave the common, but nonsensical reason, which is that God gave us free will (and by saying this again negated God’s word and which implies that man’s will/what he wants is more important that God’s). Though she no doubt believed that God’s will was that man’s will be done, it’s a clear nonsensical error because mankind has multiple conflicting wills, things like I’m sure, putting God in Hell, or making a visible slave of him on Earth. So how can God do both? Obviously he can’t be in Hell and on Earth at the same time, or have the same woman’s body in two different locations for whatever man would like to be with her. The Bible clearly teaches that it is God’s will that is always done.
On top of that, Mary was implying (and all Arminian Christians, which includes many Pentecostals, and any Christian who believes that man’s will is accomplished over God’s) is implying the insane, the illogical: that man can do anything he wants simply by wanting to, by willing to do so in other words, or some would say, “wishing for it”. How insane is that? It’s against the common sense that everyone on Earth believes, except the severely insane, to believe that you can do whatever you want simply by wishing to. This teaching I just remembered, is more widespread than I realized: ever remember being taught “if you want something enough you can have it” or “if you try hard enough” or “you can accomplish whatever you want if you set your mind to it“? These pretentious cliches are used to encourage kids and young adults in public schools, especially the poor minorities no doubt (and no wonder most of them remain poor and die young being mislead by such stupidity). It was also spread all over the world by “gurus” by people like the super narcissist Tony Robbins.
A little while later, another caller asked Mary if she believed in reincarnation. Mary reluctantly said that she did believe in. When George asked why she was uncomfortable saying that she did, she said that she wasn’t supposed to because, get this: she was a Catholic.
Why doesn’t the Pope, if he is a so called by Catholics, “good man”, “of God”, does he, the leader of the Catholic Church, excommunicate Noory and Catholics worse than him? Some Catholic may say, “Well we don’t believe whatever the Pope says, only if he says it comes from God,” well hello: The Pope didn’t get to be the Pope by accident: he was put there by the other leaders you put yourselves under. And don’t Catholics realize that they are admitting that the Pope is a liar then? Does the Pope say, “It’s my opinion that babies shouldn’t be aborted”? No: he and your leaders state in public that it is wrong. Now if that is merely their opinions, then they are lying by claiming it’s Catholic doctrine, God’s will that it not be done. So Catholics are not justified by simply dismissing things the Pope says as merely his isolated opinions. It’s the same with child sexual abuse that occurs in their church: if it’s epidemic and generated by some sanctioned teaching itself in the church, like that priests should abstain from having a wife and sex at all, than to support that same “Church” is to approve of the child sexual abuse.
An argument against that, which I just realized, that someone might use against that, is “Well aren’t you supporting the evils of the US government or your local ones if you pay taxes to them and you know they will use it for wrong?” My answer is “No”, because the tax money is spread out for many different uses, often good, and are not highly focused in what they are used for, which in the Catholic church is always, supplies for demonic rituals, dogmatizing, setting up situations for secret abuse, church utility bills, with a little help for the poor and needy on the side, and that even is meant to convert/draw people into people to Catholicism. All governments are corrupted with evil men and women in them, so it can’t be helped that some of the tax money they get will be wrongly used. If there was a better government and not hard to live under, and the difference in behavior was great, and it wouldn’t kill you to try and go live under them, then I would agree you should do so. Besides that, God said,
If a ruler listens to lies, all his officials become wicked. (Proverbs 29:12)
And God is trustworthy. Therefore, anyone who accepts the Pope as their leader is very evil and an overall liar, and therefore a person who shouldn’t be trusted at their mere word and especially not for important jobs, especially not with saving someone’s life, unless that Catholic is highly constrained to do what is right.
After Mary, George had Hank Wesselman as his main guest. That man was so annoying, so pretentious, and mixed anthropology, traditional Darwinism and demonism (he said he was communicating with “jinn” (the Arabic word for demons) at one time. He went on and on excruciatingly about his talks with jinn, acting like he was telling the world something profound, and like he was some super holy wise man for having had the experience). Incredibly this man was so hardened, that even though he had read Forbidden Archaeology “for hours”, he still refused to believe the obvious fact that Earth is not older than 7000 years and implied a damaging confusing teaching was that he would have to see the objects himself that were mentioned in the book in order to believe in them. By so doing this evil idiot was teaching that multiple written eyewitness testimony cannot be trusted, but illogically that only him directly seeing and testing the objects is the only way to know (which is the attitude of a narcissist and blind person). Many excuse-makers who don’t want to believe the Bible use his excuse of, “I have to see it myself” yet hypocritically don’t use this standard for other things which they don’t perceive as validating the Bible (like seeing someone on TV jumping on an alligator or a singer at a concert – they just believe those things really happen). Yet if they see video or pictures of things which validate the Bible, they automatically doubt for not logical reason, and can’t be bothered to do a little research on the discoveries, and if they do, and find what merely appears to be a reasonable argument against the evidence, like in some forum or blog, they then automatically write the evidence off, and forget about it.
No wonder the world is devolving into extremely immoral idiots, like Adrianne Curry: they embrace demons. Even police officers and governments themselves are doing so. And this validates the incredible claim in the Bible that in the last days the world will openly accept Satan, calling him “The Beast”, and if not openly accepting him, openly accepting someone whom they know has his character.