Posts Tagged ‘pedophiles’

About Pedophiles and Anti-Pedophiles

February 4, 2016 Leave a comment

In my middle age I’ve learned all I need to know about this world:

God has one way to truth: being truthful and loving being truthful, (not loving all truths, because many truths are extremely sad and things to forget because of how sad and cruel they are), and Satan is a twister of truth and tries to imitate it at times to cause those who listen to him to have a greater damnation.

Do you know this saying?: “if it seems to good to be true it probably is”?

What do you think of someone with a criminal background who despises any authorities like the government, judges and law enforcers, who say “I hate pedos” and talk about wanting to kill them? I see:

1. An arrogant, untrustworthy person with corrupt judgment because he’s said he hates (in part) enforcers and judges of right from wrong (so he then acts like only his judgments are valid!)

2. A cold hearted plotter of murder

3. A voilent person with a bad temper (such people are abusive to anyone young or old, and therefore hypocritical when they claim to be anti-abuse)

4. A moron, because pedophelia can mean more than one thing, isn’t a black and white issue, but contentious because it’s NOT non-tradition in many cultures to marry young or immoral to marry young to old, and “attraction to a younger person” doesn’t at all necessarily = “a sexual predator of youths”, not at all. A “pedophile” can be a mislabel by such morons, or someone with a true unhealthy obsession with KIDS (not adolescents or teens, as teens are young adults, and it’s not outside of historical norms to be attracted to or to marry an adolescent).

5. Biased possibly because they were molested as a kid (and taught wrongly a molester = pedophile and pedophile = has no normal attractions and is evil and prone to molesting. It’s circular reasoning. Not only that, by similar logic an anti-pedophile (as in a Westerner or someone against age difference attractions) molested person may claim a kid molester was likely molested and therefore not trusthworthy around kids, obviously then the reasoning/judgment and self-control of the molested one is also suspect! They can’t be trusted either!

Attraction to a kid anymore than an adult with kid-like features doesn’t make them “pathologically obsessed with those a year or more younger” or “to kids/persons under 12”, or someone attracted to dominating or abusing kids, a true pedophile OBSESSES on those under 12, and has a non-normal view of what is attractive. To them any kid with some beauty is sexually attractive or a certain look or looks among kids, as in a fetish. It is as not normal as someone obsessed with 23-year-olds, an unhealthy fixation on a particular age. In fact it is unhealthy (think about the tons of divorces among antipedophiles) to try to only be attracted to a date someone of your own age! By doing so you are acting and thinking like a Catholic priest who tries to abstain from sex (which the Bible forbids! among Christian leaders!!) and due to that unnatural restriction ending up not just being hypocritical in the end when like a priest you break you moral standard but go even further and molest or rape someone due to the heavy mental burden you took on, bottling up a huge amount of sexual pressure which then ferments into rage.

Yes: anti-“pedophelia” speech, laws and voilence LEADS to “child abuse”!

Don’t invent unecessary laws like the Pharisees in the Bible did, which was their cheap fake way of trying to hide their evil and appear righteous, which the ignorant q d gullible fell for. It’s enough to avoid sex and sexual lust out of wedlock and not go to extremes, like marrying a 7 year old or expecting a kid to behave and think like an adult!

You criminals in jail and prison: stop with cheapshots against “pedos” and boasting about your hate for them when your very crimes are what (especially combined with the crimes of everyone and your unknown crimes) causes righteous and especially already evil people to crack under pressure and take their anger out on kids! Beat up yourselves if you hate child abuse so much because you yourselves contributed to it you hypocritical judges who conveniently boast! That goes for paid judges too: You judges of many years know you have often been sloppy in your judging and careless of truth, such judging causes intense hatred in those you judge which provokes them to true or further crimes like “child abuse”.

Anyone can say, “I hate those people, I want to kill them”, how are you by saying that showing YOU’RE MORALLY GREATER THAN A “PEDOPHILE” OR “RAPIST”?! Such talk is too convenient especially for someone not willing to commit to perfectly obeying God’s laws, like not stealing, lying, murdering, worshiping things other than God, remembering the Sabbath and loving and forgiving all. If you make yourself judge and punisher God will hold you to a much higher standard of judgment too you blind hypocrites!

Finally, you if you harm or kill the “pedophile” may cause the destruction of the children dependant on them and cause them in their grief and rage to become “pedophiles” to avenge and satisfy themselves.

Work on yourself first, stop with the cheap talk and pretending your hate and voilence makes up for your sins, your other hate and voilence! Go to God over your sins instead of pretending your cheap talk and voilence will get God to forgive you, you’ll not, you’ll be punished and despised by God even more!

“You hate all who do wrong.” – Psalm 5:5


Some New Logical Fallacies Explained

January 5, 2013 Leave a comment

This journal has more on logical fallacies than this one page. You can use the search engine specific to this journal to find them, not the one on the very top, or google “Knight’s, eternian, logical fallacies” or use the keyword or category tag I used.

More Common Logical Fallacies

Converse Accident aka Hasty Generalization: Considering only a few cases, or only exceptional cases, and making an erroneous generalization from these limited examples. “Some pedophiles had been abused, therefore abuse is obviously the cause of pedophilia”

False Attribution: This is when a false description of someone or a group is made and based on the arguer’s repudiation on that description. “All pedophiles abuse children, (so then I say:) pedophilia is therefore evil.”

False Cause aka Non Causa Pro Causa: This is to mistake what is not the cause of a given effect for its real cause. “Pedophiles were abused, therefore abuse causes pedophilia.” One variation of this fallacy is called Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, assuming causation from mere temporal precedence.

Causal Link Fallacy: These are false arguments which simply conclude that one thing causes another though the relation between cause and effect is a complex one without clear evidence that no other cause could the reason or when there is just as much or more evidence that there is another causal relation. Example: “Disordered brain mechanisms that cause pedophilia which causes them to molest children is a mystery.” Here the arguer assumes not just one, but three inappropriate links: that disordered brain mechanisms cause pedophilia, (and that supposing it is a genuine disorder) that it’s not a mental disorder as in in the mind rather than brain and that pedophilia causes children to be molested. Another example, “Disordered brain mechanisms that cause adultophilia which causes them to watch adult porn, commit adultery against adult marriage partners, to divorce their marriage partners, mistreat their children by assuming things about them and basing their actions based on those assumptions, be overbearing to their children, mistrust their children and have evil suspicions about them, go into an irrational rage and have violent temper tantrums at thinking they are close by to a pedophile and to desire or attempt to murder them, to peep on and rape adult women and fight off anyone who tries to stop them or flee in fear when discovered committing rape, is a mystery.” Here the arguer links immoral actions committed by adults with attraction to other adults merely because they are. Another example, ” “Disordered brain mechanisms that cause blacks to commit more crimes than whites and to be attracted to other blacks who are less attractive and more criminal prone than whites is still a mystery.” Another example, ” “Disordered brain mechanisms that cause white women to be attracted to black and vice versa men is still a mystery.”

All kinds of other variations could be made so that these logical fallacies were full of other kinds of logical fallacies, some of these ones I made are fallacies of other types or arguably so, but I chose to keep this article simple.

An Interesting Story About Pedophile Paranoia, Hypocrisy and Clashing Religious Views