Archive

Posts Tagged ‘mainstream science cult’

The Dangers of Atheism, Narcissism and Secular Science

March 29, 2014 4 comments

I’ll try to make this short and to the point. Atheism is a dangerous mind set because it is a delusional state of mind in which a person has convinced themselves that morality comes not from a God who may send you to suffer forever in Hell if break his morality/by disobeying his commandments/laws, but from man, and is therefore something that is not permanent and in which there is no danger of eternal suffering for disobeying. I can give all kinds of horrific examples of how then an atheist could then justify what most people would call psychopathic behavior. As in what most people would call evil acts committed without showing any guilt over it. I say “most people”, because most people are not atheists, unless you count Buddhists of the East, though Buddhists at least have some sort of commandments, but how well they adhere to it, who knows: www.sacred-texts.com/bud/busc/busc11.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Precepts#Ten_Precepts

Clear examples of atheism leading to murderous psychopathic behavior were given by the atheist leaders Stalin, Hitler (who, being a clever atheist, used religion to mask his agenda of subjugating everyone), Mao and perhaps Pol Pot, whose atheism though not stated is perhaps evidenced by his complete lack of promoting any religion. The murders of those atheists combined exceed the murders of the Catholic cult for the past 1000 years. In just 100 years those atheists murdered or killed over 50 million people. There are about 300 million people in the United States, imagine if 50 million of them were suddenly wiped out by some disease spread by an atheist biologist going around the country releasing his virus into water supplies.

I met one narcissist atheist who regularly trolls the internet – he’s a stalker of mine, who claimed that it wasn’t the fault of atheism, but communism. In other words: just ignore that they were atheists and focus only on communism. Talk about “intellectually dishonest”. Just imagine the field day atheists would have if a communist Christian had murdered 50 million people. They’d ignore the communism and trump up, “He believed in those horrible ten commandments!” Actually no they wouldn’t, because they conveniently ignore the ten commandments, knowing they are good, at least instinctively, so would more likely say with pretentiousness, “See what good religion is?! It lead to such a great loss, oh the tragedy. Religion is the cause of all wars.” In other words they’d be vague, ignoring specifics, pretending all religions are the same, ignoring what type of Christian this person was (meaning failing to examine if he was someone who misinterpreted the Bible and had a very warped understanding of it, or simply didn’t care if he was disobeying it). Most atheists I encounter off or on the net are either mentally ill or are very stupid and ignorant and think in this way. “Religion is to blame” is their excuse for their hypocritical behavior. Kind of like saying, “Religion made me do it/hurt that person.” Consider the irony of that excuse! An atheist is more likely to blame religion for their evil behavior than a religious person is likely to blame their religion I imagine.

People with the permanent mental disorder known as narcissistic personality disorder seem more likely to be atheists than of some traditional type of Christian religion like Catholicism, Lutheranism or the Calvinistic branches. That is because those religions teach that God’s commandments should be obeyed and worshiped. Catholicism however is polytheistic in that if adds gods to be worshiped of a sort, like Mary, angels and so called saints. Though they deny it it’s clear they do and in their “Catholic Bible” the commandment about not making or bowing down to idols has been removed. Consider the blasphemy of doing that. The Bible also says that anyone altering Scripture like that has a curse put on them. A narcissist DOES NOT want to worship anyone, but to have himself worshiped or rather have whatever he says don.

A narcissist is permanently bent towards an evil disposition, and so if he is also an atheist, becomes a criminal-minded person. Such people, horrifically, can rise all the way to leadership of countries with millions of people and have: Stalin, Hitler, Mao and possibly others. It seems impossible to many I imagine, that people who would seem to be so mentally unhealthy could gain such power, but it is possible because there can be those among them that have just enough patience, cleverness, know-how when it comes to lying to pull it off. And consider that it is probably not the hardest thing in the world to form a gang which can grow in power through theft, murder, stalking, bullying and technology, including through gun use till it takes over and takes a part of a large country. Consider also the “psychopath/serial killer” next door, who by pretending to be a normal good person by his behavior and words, imitating those he or she instinctively senses are the opposite of them, manages to blend in, while secretly, sometimes when alone or with a partner they think or is like themselves, tortures or murders others in darkness or isolation from the rest of civilization.

Some might think that in a world where governments are plagued with narcissists and psychopaths, that the world can still get by advancing till it weeds them out, and they look to the present state of the world as an example I imagine. For example Hitler was eventually gotten rid of, even if he did manage to escape to Indonesia, and George Bush Jr. was not elected again, and Popes given to murdering their opposition are no longer in power, seemingly, and the Dalai Lama (who was part of a long line of very evil oppressors in Tibet) was ousted by China (yet many Tibetans want him back!). But I think rather than it isn’t that such evil has been done away with or is being done away with, or being coped with successfully, I think what has happened is that more clever narcissists have come to power, ones who having studied history, seeing what keeps a person in power or not, have learned how to mask even better their evil personality and evil intent. A certain clever narcissist in power of the most powerful country today works in a very stealthy and slick way to pick apart what he personally does not like, which besides being the world in general, is mostly those who are for capitalism, a republic and Christianity.

A major problem in attempting to eliminate narcissism and atheism is that such people have already corrupted many others with their beliefs, including theists, so much so that they still support them even when they do great evils. For example Hitler, Mao, the Dalai Lama and I’d bet Stalin, all still have many supporters. It’s similar to how the ancient Jews under Egypt’s oppressive rule chose in their evil disposition to lose patience in their time of freedom WHILE SUFFERING to then, nonsensically, want to go back under a time of oppression WHILE FEELING GOOD, like eating after doing work, and so on. And many see the teaching of evolutionism and Big Bangism as having freedom them from oppression (and perhaps they instinctively sense that those teachings are what helped bring to power such evil leaders), and think that if they are gotten rid of, that “bad religion” would come back into “the schools” and “brainwash” everyone into being “slaves” again (slaves of what?) or technologically backwards (as if ipods, phones, cars and telescopes to play with didn’t exist because of Moses, Christ and the apostle Paul – but it’s disobedience to God that hinders technological progress actually). So, many people suffering now in America, Russia, Tibet or China, due to their poverty or being oppressed by current leaders desire to go back to an even worse time with worse leaders, who they rationalize as being better because, “At least they did such and such like Putin/Obama etc. and did not do such and such like those men.” But they ignore or don’t see that such times were hardly, if at all, better than now. Though I can probably easily argue that the early 1900s were much better than now (more traditional Christian values were upheld throughout the world, Darwinism and Big Bang propaganda was not so wide spread or rather did not have as many believers), I can just as easily show it was about as bad as it is right now in 2014. Examples: WW1 and WW2 and other wars besides those, the many cults that existed then most of which still seem to be around and even larger now, the many deceptions being spread and bad policies, like the Prohibition, lies about hemp and marijuana, so it’s not hard to show that the recent past was not much better. I’m sure too that there were many crimes being committed by police from 1900 to 1945, when traditional Christian values were nearing a slow but severe erosion in America and Europe, starting at about 1958 it seems to me. That was a time when Elvis rose to power and the U.S. “military-industrial complex”.

“Don’t ask, ‘Why were the old days better than these?’ For it is not to be wise that you would ask such questions.” – Ecclesiastes 7:10, King Solomon

The Boyd Bushman Hoax and Appeal to Authority Fallacy

July 11, 2012 3 comments

Boyd Bushman being interviewed by the mathematician, UFO investigator, theoretical physcist and New Ager, David Sereda

An image of one of Boyd supposedly demonstrating anti-gravity


David Sereda, idiot New Ager genius

I saw this comment on YouTube, which was in reply to someone who said that a former employee, a scientific researcher and inventor, in other words a research and development worker, named Boyd Bushman, was a fraud. Whether he really was an employee of Lockheed I don’t know, but he does have at least one patent. But so, in reply to the one calling him a fraud, someone made an illogical comment and perpetuated/parroted a common logical fallacy used by Big Bangers and Evolutionists/Mainstream Science cultists/anti-fundamentalist Christians (fundamentalists are also known as Reformed Christians aka Calvinists and wrongly as conservative Christians who are usually Catholics, Episcopalians, Methodists, and Free Will (Arminian) Christians, though some Reformed Christians do call themselves conservatives, which I think is confusing):


“Don’t you love all the experts on youtube who think they are smarter than a senior scientist from lockheed martin.. Yea, all the while they are working at mcdonalds, yet when they are on the internet they suddenly become expert physicists, describing how experts from Lockheed are wrong and are frauds.. Google patents – Boyd Bushman

My reply:

Just because someone works for Lockheed or performed odd experiments doesn’t mean they know what they are talking about or won’t do deceptive things, AT ALL. A good example is mainstream scientists: they spread bad theories like the big bang and evolution, and stars-from-gas using the good base of the scientific method, why?: money and fame, and many of them have narcissism disorder (narcissists tend to be at the front of the face of everything in the world, including governments. That is because of their ill desire for large amounts of attention and praise).

Boyd even, in one video deliberately talks very vague in a childish and unhelpful way, childish in that he’s not saying anything specific but what it is common for any seasoned scientist like David Sereda who interviewed him, rather, Boyd said “watch nature”. Well what scientist DOESN’T OBSERVE NATURE?! Hello: NEWTON, EINSTEIN, GALILEO and on and on, and biologists regularly attempt to copy God’s work, looking for new industrial or medical chemicals in plants and animals.

Leedskalnin, was he a scientist? Do you know who he is? He was the “McDonalds cashier” scientist as a narcissistic scientist  might say, but despite being a “nobody” lacking college degrees still made an enormous monument using what seemed to be by a combination of antigravity and the use of a traditional weights, levers and pulley moving method. To use the McDonalds cashier insult is a bad stereotype, since genius and truth spring as much from idiots and the lowly as much as the wealthy and elite-schooled; it’s a very wrong stereotype.

Another reason it’s not wise to make fun of McDonald’s employees, is because, supposing for all you know you’re making fun of someone who only has a part time job is an employee there and yet has expertise in some field of physics or some other science field, like logic, theology, maths or physics (and does it take a great imagination to consider that many McDonald’s cashiers are college or university students in some science class, including physics?) and may even be a paid teacher of any of those, maybe even a theoretical physics teacher, which is are types people like yourself usually exalt above as superior persons. And in this so called “bad world economy” it’s very likely that many people of prestige have some second lowly job, especially being that theoretical science isn’t an easy job to profit from. If you hadn’t noticed Michio does a lot of interviews, do you think he does them all for free? Someone of prestige with many high degrees could have some second lowly job just to get rid of the last few payments they own on a loan or to get a loan, or make the final payments on whatever or to help care for a new baby or adopted son or daughter they have to live comfortably.

Back to Leedskalnin: you could reasonably think of him as a type of Boyd Bushman, because tho he was able to pull off amazing things, he didn’t say anything useful enough to be able to duplicate his feats, instead he gave a theory which was so vague (like Boyd) it amounted to vain showing off. That is the case with Boyd. Boyd, Leedskalnin, Maurice Ward (supposed inventor of Starlite) and Hutchison are, in comparison to the inventor Morgado, the inventor of the MYT Engine and Tesla useless people, and shameful even.

Rather than mocking McDonald’s cashiers as being stupid and unreliable for scientific truth and as none being people with any expertise in science, it’s Mainstream Scientists, including any atheist, humanist, pagan, Armininan, New Age, Hindu, Buddhist or Muslim ones, who should be mocked, who should be called “kooks” or “crackpots”. But you shouldn’t say that to just anyone’s face, because you wouldn’t want to unnecessarily insult someone or provoke a violent person to harm you or someone else. They should be called those things if they teach their bad beliefs or endorse them by name, like saying, “Yes being a Muslim is good” or “There’s nothing wrong with being a pagan” or “Fundamentalism is bad (fundamentalism is just belief in basic teachings of the Bible necessary for being a good Christian).” I’m not saying that just because someone is a kook or crackpot or stupid that they can’t come up with anything useful or don’t do anything useful or that nothing useful can be learned from accidental discoveries they make, just that any severely bad teachings they have or believe would make them those things, as opposed to simply having some lowly job at McDonald’s and/or not having any degrees or prestigious awards or prestigious scientists agreeing with you or some popular people.

Also, to attack someone as having illegitimate critique skill or judgment merely because they work at McDonald’s, or as cashier or some other “lowly” job there is called an “Ad Hominem Fallacy”, which is when you personally insult someone for something they do that is far from directly related to what they arguing about, merely talking about or endorsing.

Related Articles:

Autodidactic Hall of Fame – Self-educated People Who’ve Made a Difference

6 Uneducated Amateurs Whose Genius Changed the WorldRead more: 6 Uneducated Amateurs Whose Genius Changed the World (Cracked.com)

1 Cor 1:25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
1 Cor 1:26 For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth.
1 Cor 1:27 But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong;
1 Cor 1:28 God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are,
1 Cor 1:29 so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. – ESV

Psalm 8:2: From out of the mouths of infants and sucklings you have established strength on account of your adversaries, to cause the silence of the enemy and vengeful foe.

Matthew 11:25: “Jesus said, ‘I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from wise and intelligent people and have revealed them to infants.'”

John 7:24: “Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.”

UPDATE: Recently Boyd Bushman was shown in a video as having “disclosed” that aliens and their ships were here on Earth at Area 51 and “24 hours a day working on UFOs”. In one picture he showed what was to me an obviously fake alien, and used poorly made photographs to use as his evidence. The cameraman interviewing him seemed to be doing a deliberately poor job interviewing him and even keeping the camera in focus or used a deliberately poor camera. One commenter on Youtube.com showed an obscenely titled link to a model statuette of the same fake-looking alien Boyd had shown in one of his crappy pictures. Even though that was pointed out in the comments, the one doing so did not get any votes up as far as I could see, rather those praising Boyd and/or while criticizing his and the camera man’s method of presentation were the ones getting votes up. Why is Youtube filled with such gullible idiots? I wonder if the Internet naturally attracts narcissists and those who are gullible and wanting attention, and those who are not gullible and attention-craving abstain from wasting their time voting, in general, to their hurt in many cases. I say that because votes and comments can persuade others to be stupid and evil or wise in a morally good way.

Boyd Bushman Fake Alien (Doll) Hoax Picture Boyd Bushman Fake Alien (Doll) Hoax Picture Comparison
Obviously a doll, and in the second comparison picture it’s obvious the “teeth and smile” are jpeg noise from picture compression. Being that the keywords on the tinypic.com were the same obscene ones as the page of the full picture of the doll it’s obvious this is from the hoaxer, having a laugh at everyone.

By the way, if anyone does want to invest their time or money in a real anti-gravity saucer project, one you can see being made in real time, consider funding my project at http://gofundme.com/deception, which some asshole/s on Craigslist keep flagging away. If you have any mechanical engineering skills and knowledge of physics and would like to apply for a job helping to build this craft attraction go ahead and email me.

Categories: Logic Fallacies Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Two Mainstream Science Geniuses Call Skeptic Mainstreamers “Brainwashed”

November 3, 2011 Leave a comment

The Mind, Physics and a “Breakthrough” Theory of Everything

On the radio show Coast to Coast AM, on the second half of the show today (not the upcoming one today), were two Mainstream Science guests and scientific geniuses. George Noory was the host who interviewed them. Here are the biographies of these two scientists:

Bio on Dr Vernon Neppe

Vernon M . Neppe MD, PhD(Med), FRSSAf, FFPsych(SA), FRCPC, MMed (Psych), DipABPN (Psychiatry; Geriatric Psychiatry; Forensic Psychiatry), DABFM, DABFE, DABPS (Psychopharmacology), FACFE, LMACFE, MB, BCh, DPsM , BA is Director of the Pacific Neuropsychiatric Institute in Seattle, WA, Adjunct Professor of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO and formerly Director, Division of Neuropsychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Dr Neppe has contributed internationally in the specialties of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Neurology, Psychopharmacology, Forensic Psychiatry, Anomalistic Psychology and Epileptology. He also is an author, professional speaker, playwright and philosopher. His books on brain medications include Cry the Beloved Mind: A Voyage of Hope and Innovative Psychopharmacotherapy as well as The Psychology of Déjà Vu.

His listings include editions of Americas Top Doctors, Whose Who in the World, Best Doctors in America, Two Thousand Notable American Men, Five Thousand Personalities of the World, Five Hundred Leaders of Influence, Great Minds of the 21 st Century and Americas Top Psychiatrists. He was an International Man of the Year, received a Millennium Medal of Honor, and has recently been honored for his scientific contributions by being possibly the first USA based physician to be elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of South Africa. He has written more than two hundred publications, and lectured in a dozen countries on four continents and at about 90% of the medical schools in the USA. He was educated in South Africa where he obtained both his primary Medical and PhD degrees, and at Cornell University.

Dr Vernon Neppe founded the PNI in Seattle, WA in late 1992. Dr Neppe also does extensive forensic consultations, and records review but does not do criminal medicolegal work.

Bio on Dr. Edward R. Close PhD, PE

Dr. Close studied physics, math, philosophy, and creative writing at Central Methodist College, receiving his Bachelor of Arts degree in Math and Physics in 1963. He spent one year in the graduate physics program at the University of Missouri at Rolla and one year in the environmental engineering PhD program at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. Additional studies were completed at UCLA, UC Davis, Case Western Reserve and elsewhere. He completed his thesis and received his PhD in environmental science and engineering in 1988.

The focus of Dr. Close’s work is the integration of science and consciousness studies. As a physicist, his areas of research are relativity and quantum mechanics. Since 1959, his exploration of the physical sciences has been enhanced by the intensive practice of consciousness expansion techniques. A member of several professional organizations, MENSA, the International Society for Philosophical Enquiry (ISPE) and Self-Realization Fellowship (SRF), he has traveled extensively and taught mathematics, physics, and meditation techniques. He has recently accepted the position of Science Editor for Telicom, the journal of the ISPE.

Edward R. Close, PhD, PE, is a recognized expert in environmental science, has served as environmental advisor to more than fifteen Fortune 500 companies, and has more than forty years experience in the environmental field. He is the author of numerous technical papers and five nonfiction books, including Nature’s MoldRx – The Non-Toxic Solution to Toxic Mold (2007), as well as the DVD: Toxic Mold – A Breakthrough Discovery.

Dr. Close has more than forty years’ experience in environmental planning and management, engineering, hydrology, hydrogeology, and industrial-waste management with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 1965-1978, and private consulting firms, 1978-1995. While working as a research hydrologist in the Water Resources Division of the USGS, he was chosen from hundreds of employees, nationwide, to become one of the seven scientists selected to form the first Department of Interior, Systems Analysis Mathematical Modeling Group, where he worked with internationally known environmental mathematicians, including Dr. Nickolas Matalas, Dr. John Bredehoft, and Dr. Benoit Mandelbrot.

In 1995, Dr. Close opened Close Environmental Consultants in Southeast Missouri. He continues to serve clients that range from Fortune 500 companies, mid-size and small local businesses to individual property owners as principal consultant with EJC Enterprises. He has worked in eleven U.S. States, on the island of Puerto Rico, and in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Dr. Close is a member of numerous professional societies, including the Indoor Air Quality Association (IAQA), the National Society of Professional Engineers, the American Water Resources Association, the National Water Well Association, the American Institute of Hydrology, the Cape Area Engineers, MENSA, and the International Society for Philosophical Enquiry (ISPE). He currently serves as Science Editor for “Telecom,” an ISPE quarterly periodical, is a Registered Professional Engineer (PE) in the State of Missouri, a Registered Environmental Site Assessor, a Registered Well Installer, and a Registered Professional Hydrologist.

Dr. Close has on-going interests in language, linguistics, symbolic logic, and consciousness studies. One of his books, Transcendental Physics (1997), explores the interface of modern physics and consciousness and has been cited in numerous publications including Dr. David Stewart’s book The Chemistry of Essential Oils Made Simple.

——————————–

This is the Coast to Coast AM show description (from coasttocoastam.com) of the show they were on:

Consciousness & Reality
Date: 11-02-11
Host: George Noory
Guests: Dr. Vernon Neppe, Edward R. Close, Jerome Corsi

Neuropsychiatrist Dr. Vernon Neppe and physicist Dr. Edward Close discussed their work integrating science, mathematics, and philosophy with consciousness studies to arrive at their new paradigm shifting model– “Reality Begins with Consciousness.” Neppe (who appeared in the 2nd & 4th hours) pointed out how every ‘Theory of Everything,’ such as put forth by Einstein and Hawking, has had major failings because they haven’t factored in consciousness into the equation. He described three levels of consciousness– neurological, psychological, and a kind of meta-consciousness which pulls in information from all sources, and “technically would not require a brain…and implies infinity.”

Meta-consciousness suggests that life-after-death is a reality, as consciousness can exist outside the brain, Neppe noted. “In our model, we cogently argue that time is not just one linear dimension that goes past, present, future, but that there are several different dimensions of time,” and all of existence could be said to exist at the same time because “we have an extended amount of time that always is, was, and will exist,” he continued. Dr. Close (appearing in the third hour) commented that scientific views have been limited for many years, and required a more expansive paradigm or framework.

Using mathematics, Close developed his theory of “dimensional extrapolation,” which suggests the existence of additional dimensions– at least 10, which coincides with what has been said in string theory. There are three dimensions of time, three of space, and three of consciousness, and a 10th dimension that is “transfinite,” he detailed. Humans inhabit all of these dimensions, “however there are also other forms of consciousness that inhabit some of the dimensions” that may or may not impinge on what we experience through our physical senses, he explained. “The universe itself is conscious and intelligent and has an innate order to it,” Neppe added.

According to these two scientists, there was nothing that ruled out the existence of God in their Theory of Everything. One of them also said that their science colleagues were afraid to talk about UFOs because they were afraid their reputation might be damaged and would not get the support they wanted or were getting from the University they were in. I don’t remember if these scientists believed in intelligent design or not. They did however believe in UFOs and psychic phenomenon, and said that those scientists who denied such things were real were brainwashed. And if you read their biography, it’s clear that these are not simple idiots but among the top “wise” of the world. One of them is even an expert in psychology, brain medicines, and even on how the brain physically works! So if they are saying Mainstream Scientists are (in general), brainwashed, and you combine that statement with the claims of scientists who believe in Intelligent Design and/or the Bible and ones who are also accomplished ones (and combine that with the former atheist champion Antony Flew‘s statements against atheism); it puts Mainstreamers in a very bad light and is strong evidence that they are not trustworthy with philosophical or religious truths, let alone ones discovered through the classical scientific method of Mainstreamers. <a href="http://amzn.to/thoeryofeverything“>Dr. Close published a book this Theory of Everything. I’m not sure why Neppe isn’t included as at least an editor since I thought I heard them say they both worked on this theory, or maybe Neppe just “peer reviewed” it. The show can be heard on Youtube, just click here. It’s sad that it will take seeing God himself and being before the entrance to Hell before some will finally believe in God and his justice, and by that time, there will be no more mercy, no more offer of salvation.

Categories: Mainstream Science Cult, philosophy, Theories of Everything (TOEs) Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

FTL: New Evidence Against Relativity… From CERN

September 23, 2011 1 comment

[There is an update to this story, the experiment has been repeated and succeeded again click here to read about it]

Faster than light? CERN findings bewilder scientists
By Eryn Brown and Amina Khan, Los Angeles Times
9/23/2011

Physicists at the lab near Geneva say they’ve observed subatomic particles moving faster than the speed of light. If confirmed, it would defy Einstein — and upend our understanding of physics.

The globe of the CERN laboratory shines outside Geneva. A team of experimental physicists there says it has recorded neutrinos traveling 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light. Albert Einstein had the idea. A century of observations have backed it up. It’s one of the cornerstones of physics: Nothing travels faster than the speed of light.

But now a team of experimental physicists at the European Organization for Nuclear Research, known as CERN, says that one exotic particle possibly can.

The scientists reached their conclusion after sending streams of tiny, subatomic particles called neutrinos hurtling from an accelerator at CERN outside Geneva to a detector at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy, about 450 miles away.

The neutrinos seemed to get there too soon — 60 nanoseconds too soon, give or take — than they should if they’d been traveling at the speed of light.

That slight edge, if it holds up under scrutiny, has enormous implications for our understanding of the laws of nature, physicists said – More here

“Basically, all of special relativity would be wrong,” said Drexel University physics professor Dave Goldberg, referring to Einstein’s 1905 theory establishing that light travels at a constant speed, regardless of how fast an observer is traveling, and that nothing in the universe can go faster than it. – More here

More information:

The Great Gravity Probe B Hoax

Faster Than Light? Neutrino Finding Puzzles Scientists

Faster than a Speeding Light Wave

The First Test That Proves General Theory of Relativity Wrong

Was the Speed of Light Faster In the Early Universe?

Speed of Light May Have Varied in the Early Universe

The Decrease in The Speed of Light (Video) Part 1

The Decrease in The Speed of Light (Video) Part 2

The Decrease In the Speed of Light – An Update On Developments

Reports of the Death of Speed of Light Decay are Premature

On the Constancy of the Speed of Light

Starlight and Time

‘Government Really Not Good at Keeping Secrets’ and Other Logical Fallacies of Skeptics

August 16, 2011 Leave a comment

For the second time this week I’ve heard the logical fallacy that the (US) government has no secrets because it’s not good at keeping secrets. If that isn’t circular reasoning than what is? I just heard it repeated again on Coast to Coast AM by Ronald L. Mallett. The show edition is described by the Coast site as,

Time Travel
Date: 08-15-11
Host: George Noory
Guests: Ronald L. Mallett, Lauren Weinstein

Physics Professor Ronald Mallett will discuss his breakthrough research on time travel, as well as share an update on the latest in theoretical physics.

Ronald was responding to a caller who asked if the government was hiding a secret program on time travel. Ronald then immediately contradicted himself by saying, “Whatever the human mind can think of, it can and will achieve.” In other words: “IF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT CONCEIVES OF A WAY TO KEEP SECRETS THEN IT WILL SUCCESSFULLY DO SO.” So, once again, a non-Christian, a Mainstreamer Cultist severely contradicts himself in a breath without even realizing it, and if he did realize it, he should have corrected himself, but failed and allowed others to be deceived. Some might ask, “What does that matter?” It matters because it helps people to be gullible and naive that they can believe whatever the government says, which is utter nonsense. The statement that the government is bad at keeping secrets is also nonsensical in that it contradicts itself, because it’s implying to opposite things: that the government can’t do anything in secret, and the opposite: when it does do something in secret it’s exposed right away. That is what people mean but are vague. Vague as in, how long can’t the government keep a secret? Ronald made it clear, “really bad” at it, so, not long. But what is the evidence that the government can’t do so? That’s also a logical fallacy because it’s the same as saying, “I know that the government can’t keep a secret for long because because it can only do so for a short time because it’s bad at keeping secrets” but saying so without evidence. Ronald is claiming he knows all the secrets and therefore knows all the secret departments of the military, all military secrets, that none have been kept for long, like a year? (vague), everything said in secret by every individual apart of the government, including the FBI, CIA and NSA, and that even when they classify something as above top secret and make UFOs more secret than the atomic bomb (which the military stated it did do), that he would know soon. So then, China and every other country with spies in America must know all the secrets of our government, because it has none, or accidentally reveals it soon after. So can Ronald tell us what the secret craft are that the military has? Can he tell us what happened at Area 51 for the past 40 years? Can he tell us what crashed at Roswell?: Which story out of three conflicting ones that the military gave is correct? What are the names of the many Area 51 workers that are flown and bussed in to Area 51? What are the launch codes for all the nuclear missiles of the USA and what are the names of the ones who possess the launch keys? Ronald’s claim is also logically fallacious and arrogant in another way: he’s negating that any non-government person, no citizen, can find out about the secrets, and only the government and military would in their incompetence or by accident, or that some spy would reveal it (but not a citizen who is spying on behalf of some government like China). In other words: us stupid citizens are stupid, only government and the military is smart and wise, just not smart and wise enough to keep secrets from us… uh wait, but us stupid citizens can’t find out about their secrets because we’re stupid… and there is yet another contradiction from the Royal Mainstream Scientist Ronald Mallett, wannabe time traveler, who’s motivation for going back in time, according to his self-proclaimed Skeptic self, to see his dad again. Can anyone say “shallow”? How much more needs to be pointed out about the Mainstream cult to show that they are very bad at logic in general, and that also effects their effectiveness in scientific research, and therefore can’t be trusted with their fundamental(ist) claims: There was a Big Bang billions of years ago, we evolved from some simple creatures that were created by lightning hitting chemicals (able to reproduce and think and sense what was around them), and that after billions of years, turned into (super complex and much more intelligent animals and super intelligent) humans, with many characteristics (that can’t be reasonably explained without resorting to God as having designed us), and that aliens can’t get here, because… well one guest evolutionist this or last year, on Coast to Coast AM said because it would be too coincidental. And it would be too coincidental that they showed up during this time of our evolution. But why? If there are trillions of planets with possible life and some aliens evolved to become intelligent much sooner then us, then why wouldn’t there be any chance of “just another planet out of trillions” being visited by some alien out of those trillions? Mainstream scientists truly are confused and forgetful of what they study, ever learning and never able to reach the truth. I think that if they would stop obsessing on money and selfish and shallow desires they wouldn’t be so “scatter-brained” and forgetful.

I’ve also been noticing, that recently (others would probably say often) Noory has been asking really stupid questions. During the show he asked Mallet if the time travel he was working on would be MENTAL or physical. What the Hell kind of question is that? George was asking “is your time travel device going to be metaphysical and use spiritual time travel”, because the mind is a spiritual thing, it’s not material. That’s a fact by the way, you materialists, because awareness for example, which you must have a mind for, is not a physical thing, just as actions and information are not physical things. But Ronald Mallett obviously was not talking about a spiritual device or one that manipulated the mind. I wonder if George prepares questions long before the show starts. It doesn’t seem he does, otherwise his questions wouldn’t be so dumb. But, at least God lets me use them to teach profound, deep and useful things.

There was also something else that Ronald implied which is typical of how Mainstreamers, and which shows how their morality leads to things like the 500+ million people killed by atheists (not all atheists obviously): when he said that humans can achieve anything they can think of, he was answering the same caller I mentioned earlier who brought up a stupid example for his question, which was that Suparman’s dad said that going back in time was forbidden and so asked Ronald if God ever forbade it (how about read the Bible and study religion idiot, and ask a religious person and not a materialist Mainstreamer?). Ronald, besides saying humans could do whatever they wanted to, said that if we weren’t meant to do something, then God wouldn’t allow it. That answer implies that if child molestation happens and anything that is obviously evil, it’s good or permitted by God, because we were able to do it. That besides being evil reasoning, is also a logical fallacy: if you aren’t doing something then it can be said you aren’t meant to do anything that you aren’t doing. So then it’s also contradictory. And Ronald was implying that to know if something is permitted by God, you should do it, and he surely meant that, because he also said in his answer, and I’m paraphrasing this part till I can listen again to what he said, that it was wrong to not learn and progress.

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. – Romans 8:28

Categories: Mainstream Science Cult, Skepticemia, Skepticism, skeptics Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

What the Moderators of PhysicsForums Didn’t Want You To See

April 16, 2011 9 comments

For evidence of geocentrism, click here.

What the Crackpot Troll Moderators of PhysicsForums Didn’t Want You To See, Because None of their Darwinist and Big Bang Believer Members Nor Their Darwinist Big Bang Cult Moderators Could Refute In Any Scientific, Logical or Mature Way, In Fact: HAD NO RESPONSE TO, Not Even After Day Had Passed.

A very long silence speaks loudly.

The philosophical and religion ignorant moderators of PhysicsForums didn’t want anyone to see this reply to a comment one of their members made in a post in PhysicsForums on Void Theory (three times it was posted, and three times they removed it using insults as there reasons, no science at all, and attempting to be feelings and thoughts police). And what got one of them to remove it? When a called a newbie to knowledge moron member named Nick an insulting troll who put words in my mouth, a moron with three posts on his belt in PhysicsForums, named Nick, for saying I was pretending to believe that Earth was no older than 6,500 years old, and that “it wasn’t impossible” that the Bible used figurative language, and assuming (or rather ignoring that I wasn’t) a newbie to science, literature or religion, pointed me to the figure of speech page on Wikipedia. So, his assumption that some verse/s(?) somewhere in the Bible (couldn’t be bothered to read it himself of course), because it was possible figurative language, made me wrong, and for that my first reply below was REMOVED (but I wasn’t banned) and then what? Remove three more times despite there being no replies to them, and Nick’s reply was also removed. And for reposting my first reply, I was repeatedly banned (why, if it didn’t get me banned the first time when everyone saw it and it stayed for 24 hours?). And here is the first reply that stumped, embarrassed and humiliated the weak minded moderators and anti-creationist members of PhysicsForums:

The problem with the big void of smaller density leading to apparent dark energy term is that we have to be very close to the center of the void, otherwise everything will look anisotropic. Being close to the center is HIGHLY improbable, much more improbable than being in a void at all.

Why is shoutingly HIGHLY improbable? Because you said so? NO! BECAUSE YOU ARE DELUDED, REPEATEDLY IGNORING THE DESIGN OF GOD ALL AROUND YOU AND PRETENDING IT’S RANDOM. Nothing is impossible for God, except lying. What a contradiction too: Do you think the Big Bang was HIGHLY probable? How about it being HIGHLY probable let alone at all, despite evidence repeatedly being found against it, and pointing towards a 6,500 year old universe? And where are you instincts?: You think it’s probable regardless of the repeated contrived explanations to get rid of giant problems like the billions of light years wide void in space?

What about this contradiction: It’s highly unlikely we live in the center of a void, of the universe, but it is for light of countless many kinds, countless many types, randomly, by unknown means, with many distinct emotions, a heart, desires, mind, will, self-awareness, conscience, soul, extremely complex DNA, beauty of countless kids and types wherever you look, sometimes astonishingly beautiful, life that dances, sings, sleeps (something which has been a mystery for thousands of years or millions if you believe the Big Delusion) imitates for fun, has humor (a very hard to explain thing), plays games (came up with chess, for which no perfect solution has yet been found), tries to solve everything (to various degrees), even how to create other life with understanding of how exactly to do so from start to finish, can naturally/supernaturally reproduce in three different ways: cloning, sex, and self fertilization, can withstand all kinds and types of damage, and REPAIR themselves without knowing how, and still live and flourish, on a planet on which food and drink of all kinds exist, and useful poison, with material that can form countless useful things, and though being recombined in endless ways still be beautiful, forms of life which rely on each other, help each other, and even love each other, and able to communicate in thousands of different languages or more.

Also explain to me how it is probable that various flies evolved to look almost exactly like bees, despite the upheavals all over the world that were so great they magically got rid of the trillions of transitional fossils that should exist. Please explain the fly I saw, which hovered and turned like a machine, which when I first saw thought was a Cecada Killer, but as I concentrated on, saw was a giant fly (a small strip of forest in Reston, VA). So a fly, evolved, over billions of years, to look like a somewhat related animal, with superior flying ability? That’s probable?! And not just one fly, but there is mimicry of all kinds! Even bacteria and viruses have mimicking abilities DESIGNED to fool the things they live on. And is it probable that seeds from plants would germinate after thousands of years, or millions? I haven’t looked, but I wouldn’t be surprised if someone has or will discover a seed in millions of years old strata that germinates.

And though life is often very hostile and even self-destructive, it’s flourished, with all the kinds life forms that existed in the past, still existing. And life has flourished so much, that many humans even fear “overpopulation” and come up with evil schemes to murder most people rather than schemes to populate other planets (because they are silly and evil morons with little conscience and morals). And we’ve even succeeded in going to other planets. And, there are obviously spirits, many of which clearly hate us, and though clearly having the ability destroy us, are obviously being prevented from doing so, by what are clearly good spirits, which sometimes show their presence in some way when they save a life or lives. It’s also clear, unless you’re stupid or ignorant or a stubborn God-hater, that aliens are visiting us every day, or if not visiting, having bases on Earth or nearby, and sight-seeing, even showing off to some degree I would guess. Why are there very beautiful light-up jellyfish at the bottom of the oceans? Are chameleons and cuttlefish that can also camouflage themselves AND LIGHT UP in various ways probable? What about octopi that can camouflage themselves and hide themselves in a cloud of blackness? Is it probable that life is able to flourish at the very bottom even underneath the oceans of the world? Is it probable that there would be life living in boiling ocean water at the bottom of oceans, or boiling tar, or that could survive extreme heat then extreme cold then extreme radiation, and in space? How probable was it that the Crotoniidae mite would “reevolve” the ability sexually reproduce after millions of years? What are the odds of that happening after an alleged millions of years? Yet ALL OF THAT is probable to you, from randomness? And just how many random universes do you know of that existed before to imply we are probable? And if you believe i random universes exiting before, then why would you say it’s HIGHLY improbable that we live in the center of a void? Confused much? In addition to all that, you think that all is probable, even with living “fossils” repeatedly being found, inferior in design to their giant armored forms WHICH DIDN’T SURVIVE while the smaller weaker forms did, and giant ones like Brontosaurus with inferior armor to other dinosaurs still surviving (and/or living comfortably) in the Congo, and unarmored snakes, even giant ones, surviving despite having no legs or arms or wings and a massive body exposed to easy damage? And not only have many snakes that grow to giant size survived, but can live for many decades. How do animals know how to reproduce, eat, find food, sing, dance, protect themselves, walk, fly, glide, climb, dig, slither, and some, even birds, can make tools. Is that probable? Is it probable that insects and cats have brains faster than the fastest publicly known super computers? Can you explain why dolphins, cuttlefish, octopi and parrots are as intelligent as they are? Can you explain how the Lyre bird evolved its ability to imitate any sound? How did the Bombardier beetle evolve? How do skunks know that its musk glands will repel other animals? And how do flowers know when to bloom, the beauty and scent of many which attract man to spread more of them?

Can you also tell me how probable it was for all life on the planet to have evolved into its many forms over billions of years, with everything else I mentioned? How probable also is it that when Daniel Tammet hit is head that he acquired god-like calculation and communication abilities? How does evolution explain Euler, Ramanujan and Tesla? And no doubt there are other such geniuses, who get no where because their minds have been filled with science-hindering lies and liars who go around making stupid insults to scare them into submission like, “God did it (so no need to learn anything)”. No, “evolution did it, so rape doesn’t matter, nor murdering the unborn, BUT, Christians are EVIL who dare judge that that rape and child murder are evil, and that unnatural sex which leads to population decline, which leads to fewer minds to save the world from murderous atheists and pagans. How dare they believe an old book full of contradictions and missing books! How dare they continue knowledge and preserve it! Why can’t they just forget like us and come up with new things that might be true and faith that they are true? Let’s rape and encourage pornography and abuse and murder children. Or, let’s just drink more beer and play games while trying to save the world by letting it kill itself off, so that there is less carbon dioxide, because, I don’t want to evolve to live under the ocean.” And do you think all of that is probable, including man’s extreme stupidity despite his extremely intelligent mind with it’s massive umber of neurons all interconnected (why is man so stupid and why does he do such great evil despite his intelligence and a common programmed conscience aware of good and evil), which in mentally healthy people will “burn” when they do wrong – you think all that is probable along with the fine-tuning necessary for that to all be possible?:

http://www.aish.com/ci/sam/48937152.html
http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/designun.html
http://www.godsci.com/gs/new/finetuning.html

I would also like to know from you: How likely is it that giant amphibious or fully aquatic dinosaurs have come to live in small bodies of water in the USA, far away from oceans? Jacque Cousteau knows at least one exists in Lake Tahoe. Or how is it that shrimp came to live in the middle of a desert, on a large rock structure, in Australia, extremely far any ocean? How about the fish of Death Valley, and note the word “death” in the name of that valley? How did a giant structure, broken in two, in the shape of Noah’s Ark, get on mount Ararat? “More improbable” for your random universe: why is the impression of the shape of the bottom of a ship doing at the foot of that mountain? How do you explain the many out of place artifacts in the world” (2)? Are they probable too in this billions of years old universe of your invention?


More popular is the other theory that the dark energy is apparent due to the cumulative effects of the light passing through many voids. That avoids the need for us to be in a center of a spherical void.

And why might it be more popular, TO PEOPLE LIKE YOU (NOT EVERYONE), who ignores the obvious all around you and takes it out of context in a world of people who hate God for not doing whatever they want him to do, like you? Can you make a correct guess, based on evidence, and not mere faith, so called “blind faith” by atheists and agnostics?

What a sad world atheists and pagans have made for themselves. What to choose, a life realizing how sad their lie is, and being hated for not pretending it’s truth, or joining the lie at the risk of ending up tortured and murdered by one of the liars? Who to trust, those who when they kill your body can do no more to you, or the one who can destroy both body and soul in Hell, while continuing their suffering forever and can also give eternal peace to those who trust in him? Temporary vs. eternal. What is the logical choice to make to survive, and live?

There clearly is a corrupting being that causes stupidity and evil among us, making us much worse than seems logical, and there clearly is a being that only does good and will not give in to evil, and restrains it.

Why God would isolate Earth from the rest of the universe, why he would make it difficult for the rest of his intelligent creatures to find us, why a loving being would not want to see Hell and death spread over billions of light years in all directions, why he would choose to limit sadness and pain? If he was a merciful, compassionate and loving God, it would be understandable. In conclusion, be thankful for what God has shown you, and turn to him, before it is too late, and you no longer see, smell, hear or touch his wonders.

It does not go against reason and learning to say, “In the beginning, God made the heavens and the earth,” and that God does what is wondrous in our eyes, but it does when you to try and explain everything away with “Say, ‘It was chance and evolution for why things are the way they are,’ because it’s money that matters, not truth, if you want many friends to have a comfortable life.”

God have mercy on you who hate God, because his hatred is much greater and just, and he is able to carry out anything he wills. And one day, his Son will return, both to save and to destroy.

—————–end—————–

Instead of resorting to mere insults and banning whatever you disagree with, moderators of PhysicsForums, how about be scientific and honest? How about showing the truth, instead of hiding it and accusing everyone else who disagrees with your attitude and feelings and opinions as being crackpots, trolls, making “noise” and having an attitude? If you resort to mere insults and banning along with it, doesn’t that show that you have an attitude that needs to be “canned”? Why are you above your own rules? Is that logical to attack and condemn others for/as being, doing and having those things when you yourselves make mere insults and have an “attitude”? How about you stop with the double standards, lies, and hypocrisy and encouraging immorality by claiming or implying that there is no absolute truth or morality? It is absolutely wrong to abuse and murder babies and children, why can’t you agree with that? Why does that deserve mere insults and banning? You’re not experts in religion, the Bible, God or Christianity, merely because you have some great amount of knowledge in math, biology, or physics, or are a moderator of PhysicsForums, that doesn’t make you God or my Judge does it? Promote true science and peace, not hatred with your evil attitude and cowardly anonymous attacks.

Related Information:

Characteristics of the Mainstream Science Cult and How it Imprisons the World

An Alien Base (Or Ship, Or Ancient Human-made Structure) On the Moon

“…their ships were far superior to ours, both in size and technology – Boy, were they big!… and menacing! No, there is no question of a space station… – Neil Armstrong, NASA astronaut, one of the first humans on the moon in the modern age

Categories: atheism, atheist morality, atheists, Intelligent Design vs Darwinian Evolution Theory Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Characteristics of the Mainstream Science Cult and How It Imprisons the World

Post link: http://vainstream.tk

Mainstream Science is both a propaganda system and philosophy (A belief or system of beliefs accepted as authoritative by some group or school) controlled by various rich persons who are against obedience to the God of the Bible. It is also a cult of various personalities, their main founders being, besides Satan, Kepler, Copernicus, Darwin and Einstein, mainly Copernicus, Darwin and Einstein, which are like an evil version of the Christian Trinity. The equivalent of spiritual prophets who came after the founders, were/are Galileo, Bernard Shaw, Frederick Nietzsche, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Richard Dawkins, Mike Shermer, and to some degree, Michio Kaku. It also includes and any scientist who strongly oppose the claim that God exists, or who refuse to say that he does, who claim that even if he does exist, has no concern about what happens around Him and who say or imply that there is no evidence for the Bible being true. The core beliefs and propaganda are these:

1) Sentient aliens inside of our solar system don’t exist and any that are outside can’t come to earth because nothing can have the intelligence to make a portable energy source or engine that would allow them or any unmanned machine to get to Earth.

2) Machines that can travel faster than light are impossible to make.

3) Communication that can be done faster than light is impossible.

4) Aliens can’t be more intelligent than humans.

5) It’s so improbable that aliens would find us that it will never happen because there is nothing special about our location in the universe for anything intelligent to come to us and because we haven’t existed long enough to be found

6) If aliens made it to earth they would be perfect and so never have any accidents, like whatever ship they come in to Earth, crashing on our planet.

7) The universe came into existence about 30 billion years ago for no reason from an unknown thing.

8) The event that created the universe was not caused or directed by anything intelligent and galaxies, planets, stars, asteroids and comets weren’t either.

9) The creation of life was not created by anything intelligent nor it’s development directed by anything intelligent (nor could it have been), and only humans and human like beings on earth when they came into existence were able to intelligent direct things in the universe to their liking, like breeding plants and animals and creating tools.

10) Giant hair-covered or hairless hominids, including humans, can’t and don’t exist and couldn’t have for the past 100,000 years.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

11) Dinosaurs never lived with humans and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

12) Humans didn’t exist before 100,000 years ago and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

13) Dinosaurs didn’t exist for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.

14) Dinosaurs haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.

15) Dragons never existed (or: Dragon’s haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.)

16) You can’t know if God exists unless he is a material thing that you can both see and touch and perform experiments on to see that he is God.

17) If God exists he doesn’t care about what happens around Him.

18) Reincarnation is impossible.

19) Spirits don’t exist.

20) The physiology, behavior and communicatory behavior done by animals, which include humans, can be explained by Big Bang Theory, Darwinian Evolution Theory, including why rape and why abuse of children happens.

21) More energy can’t be produced than the energy that was needed to produce that energy (for example, zero point energy devices can’t exist).

22) Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity is at least 99% true, and no other theory of how the universe works therefore can replace it.

23) Quantum Mechanical Theory is 100% true.

24) Only mainstream scientists can known if something is true or not and only through them can non-mainstream scientists and non-scientists know if something is true or not.

25) Something is true if a consensus of mainstream scientists say it is (therefore, truth is not absolute, since they can change their minds, and therefore morality is also determined by the consensus of mainstream scientists, including whether or not rape and abusing child is good or bad).

26) Charles Darwin, Mark Twain, Frederick Nietzsche, Carl Sagan, Bernard Shaw, Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Richard Dawkins, Mike Shermer and Michio Kaku are like gods (or the wisest men and their claims that the things in this list are true cannot be refuted).

27) Theists who worship a person who chooses to be invisible or invisible to mainstream scientists cannot be scientists, nor can any who disbelieve any of the 21 things in this list. Stated another way: Religion isn’t compatible with science.

28) Disorder can produce order (for example the “Big Bang” or explosions can result in Earth with all the life in it and all the countless ordered complexity with all it’s countless types of beautiful features and emotions.

29) Low order can produce higher order (like how disorder can produce order).

30) Governments can’t keep secrets for longer than 40 years.

31) Governments have never conspired against their citizens

32) Governments can’t conspire against their citizens.

33) You should doubt whatever you hear, especially those who make claims against Mainstream Science.

34) Anyone who disagrees with mainstream science should be ignored, or laughed at or spoken out against, verbally harassed, lied about, physically abused or murdered.

35) Less intelligent people should be discriminated against.

36) If aliens did make it to Earth they would make it their goal to first meet with the mainstream scientists and peaceful leaders of the world, like President Obama.

37) The climate is getting more extreme and most of the land might mostly be under water one day, therefore, stop making any carbon dioxide.

First, some of you who read this list might notice it’s core beliefs (37 I listed) are more than double the size of the ten commandments. The ten commandments can be turned into 11 or 12 and 14 if you add the “Love the Lord your God with all your heart” and “Love your neighbor as yourself” ones, and 15 if you add the new commandment Jesus made, which was that Christians were to love each other above non-Christians (and therefore non-Christian neighbors). If you added other core beliefs of Fundamentalist Christians, like that salvation is only through Christ, that Christ suffered for 100% for 100% of whatever the sins were of whoever he suffered and died for, that God is Triune, that God is all knowing (including knows the future, that God is all powerful, and that the Bible (whatever God originally said) is perfect, and that God is always to be obeyed no matter what, then you get 20 “laws”, and despite that, there is still 17 more in the Mainstream Cult.

So, at the most, 38 more things (see “Second”) must be believed in the mainstream scientist list, to be a good, decent person, reasonable, logical and “acceptable” person. So, no one who supports mainstream science can say that Mainstream Science is much easier on the mind then the Bible and that the Bible has so many laws that it makes life unbearable, without contradicting themselves.

Second, there are obvious contradictions in this list:

How is Earth having been around for 4 billion years, which mainstream scientists claim (and could be a 38th law in the list), not long enough of a time for aliens to find us?! How extremely absurd that they claim that it’s too absurd for Earth to have only been around for 6,500 years, but absurd that after FOUR BILLION any aliens could find us! It’s as if their logic is totally backwards on everything!

If aliens would be more intelligent than us, then wouldn’t we be more intelligent than the aliens that consider us aliens? It makes no sense.

I can point out the errors in mainstream cultic thinking, easily:

1) Sentient aliens inside of our solar system don’t exist and any that are outside can’t come to earth because nothing can have the intelligence to make a portable energy source or engine that would allow them or any unmanned machine to get to Earth.

There’s no evidence for this belief; they are mere claims.

2) Machines that can travel faster than light are impossible to make.

No evidence for this belief.

3) Communication that can be done faster than light is impossible.

It’s impossible in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, not other theories or ideas.

4) Aliens can’t be more intelligent than humans.

No evidence for this belief, and it’s a contradiction since other aliens would consider us “aliens”.

5) It’s so improbable that aliens would find us that it will never happen because there is nothing special about our location in the universe for anything intelligent to come to us and because we haven’t existed long enough to be found

No evidence for this belief. There is even evidence against it: Tychonic Geocentric Theory and the implication in the Bible that Earth is the center of the universe. Tycho is mostly an accepted scientist who contributed to astronomy science, and God, he made it: God + Tycho, how can you beat that?

6) If aliens made it to earth they would be perfect and so never have any accidents, like whatever ship they come in to Earth, crashing on our planet.

No evidence for this belief. Why would the ability to get from a far star to Earth = you become a god, especially when Mainstreamers supposedly don’t know how to travel faster than light, and therefore what would be required to do so!? For all they know you could do it with some combination of parts from Radio Shack and a nuclear submarine.

7) The universe came into existence about 30 billion years ago for no reason from an unknown thing.

No evidence for this belief, and much evidence against the Big Bang, so much it exhausts me to try and list it all, and I never end up finishing a book about it (which I keep trying to make).

8) The event that created the universe was not caused or directed by anything intelligent and galaxies, planets, stars, asteroids and comets weren’t either.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

9) The creation of life was not created by anything intelligent nor it’s development directed by anything intelligent (nor could it have been), and only humans and human like beings on earth when they came into existence were able to intelligent direct things in the universe to their liking, like breeding plants and animals and creating tools.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. There is also something silly about those who parrot this claim, which is that food only tastes good to us because man learned how to breed what he liked… if that isn’t arrogant and ignorant, what is? How stupid must you be, and ignorant, to not know that tons of wild food taste good, and that we still rely on it? It’s so extremely dumb to take glory away from God with such a claim. People who make this claim are either very very hateful and self-centered on their own feelings, but not mentally ill, or have anti-social personality disorder, and therefore are mentally ill. It’s also dumb because the people who make such a claim imply that they’ve tasted the differences between the many wild and “domesticated” things in the world, and that only what they prefer is what tastes good (and that wild foods don’t taste good at all). Do you see how dumb that is, what bizarre logic that is? It reminds me of North Korea’s dead and insane leader, whatever his name was.

10) Giant hair-covered or hairless hominids, including humans, can’t and don’t exist and couldn’t have for the past 100,000 years.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. Just look at the heretic Christian Steve Quayle’s site for pictures and Burlington News for extensive records of findings of giant human skeletons.

11) Dinosaurs never lived with humans and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. Just read the book Forbidden Archeology, made by a Hindu who believes Earth is millions or billions of years old (apparently finding out that mainstream scientists are oppressive liars wasn’t a big enough bang for him that their theories might also be oppressive lies).

12) Humans didn’t exist before 100,000 years ago and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

13) Dinosaurs didn’t exist for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

14) Dinosaurs haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

15) Dragons never existed (or: Dragon’s haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.)

No evidence for this belief, much against it.

16) You can’t know if God exists unless he is a material thing that you can both see and touch and perform experiments on to see that he is God.

And why would this be true? No evidence for this belief, much against it.

17) If God exists he doesn’t care about what happens around Him.

If God doesn’t exist how could you know what his personality be like if he did?! Mainstream scientists keep replacing the God of the Bible, like pathologically mentally ill people, with a God in their own image: one who does whatever they want and thinks however they want him to: that’s not “God”, that’s a slave!

18) Reincarnation is impossible.

It’s not impossible, but there is no evidence that shows it to be true, and a lot of indirect evidence against it (some which I point out out here, the rest scattered throughout my journal which is evidence for the Bible, and the Bible contradicts reincarnation, as it says man only gets one life to live here, and then either goes to Heaven, or must face condemnation and be imprisoned in Hell).

19) Spirits don’t exist.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

20) The physiology, behavior and communicatory behavior done by animals, which include humans, can be explained by Big Bang Theory, Darwinian Evolution Theory, including why rape and why abuse of children happens.

There are so many things about animals and humans that are not just “not easily explained” but for which no explanation can even be imagined, as other evolutionists have admitted in almost the same way I just said it, that you can feel (if you’re not insane and have read the news and about evolution a lot) that whatever explanation that is come up with, would be a mere claim, and probably stupid. For example: how can behaviors done by stupid animals, like maggots, which show wisdom or rather knowledge of what another thing is thinking (like larvae disguising themselves to continue eating prey) have evolved to have such knowledge? How would a newborn thing “know” to disguise itself by random events that lead to it being what it is? Try and imagine: some chemicals come together one day and turn into a thing that replicates and attaches to other chemicals to exist for a while, and then eventually, it gets nervous system, then a brain that can make decisions about where it wants to go and eat and what to touch, then it gets the ability to smell, taste, feel by touch, see, hear, and then emotions of all kinds, then the ability to talk, then to know what other animals are thinking, and then the desire to dance, sing, collect things, make art and tools and the desire to explore and have relations with other animals and aliens. Not necessarily in that order or having all the sensory abilities, but how? No one has even come up with close to an explanation as to how such things would happen by random events so that billions of “religious fanatics” would become mainstream scientists, instead, they stay loyal to whatever God or gods they worship. So clearly, there is something about theistic religions that are convincing the majority of the world to stay theists and religious. And there are many agnostics who refuse to entirely embrace mainstreamism (which ironically sounds like “extremism”).

21) More energy can’t be produced than the energy that was needed to produce that energy (for example, zero point energy devices can’t exist).

And the evidence for this is? I’m also curious to know then how nuclear power plants can be explained: If I cause an explosion that leads to a nuclear detonation that puts out more energy than I did to make the explosion, would that violate this law? Or is all the energy I used and whatever energy was used to get me to that point taken into the equation?

22) Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity is at least 99% true, and no other theory of how the universe works therefore can replace it.

There’s much evidence against GTR and Special Relativity. For those of you who want to see it, ask, and I might show it to you if I’m in a position to, or just search the Internet.

23) Quantum Mechanical Theory is 100% true.

There’s scientists who claim to have come up with evidence that it is not true.

24) Only mainstream scientists can know if something is true or not and only through them can non-mainstream scientists and non-scientists know if something is true or not.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. It’s also used or implied against those who find evidence against mainstream science, like some fossil that a non-scientist discovered which shows Mainstream age dating to be wrong.

It’s also contradictory: if only Mainstreamers can know what is true, then how can they cause anyone else to know, who isn’t one? It’s like saying, “Only Catholics can have the Holy Spirit, and therefore you can only be a Catholic if you have the Holy Spirit.”: Then how does anyone become a Catholic in the first place? Or a better analogy: “It’s impossible for there to be any other king than God, but he can make you a king if he decides to,” which makes no sense because it’s supposed to be impossible.

25) Something is true if a consensus of mainstream scientists say it is (therefore, truth is not absolute, since they can change their minds, and therefore morality is also determined by the consensus of mainstream scientists, including whether or not rape and abusing child is good or bad).

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. If it were true than racism, discrimination against people merely over their age, rape and child abuse could be “good” and “moral”, but they obviously aren’t to those who still have still have their moral instincts regarding the right or wrongness of those things.

26) Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo, Charles Darwin, Mark Twain, Frederick Nietzsche, Carl Sagan, Bernard Shaw, Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Richard Dawkins, Mike Shermer and Michio Kaku are like gods (or the wisest men and their claims that the things in this list are true cannot be refuted).

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. That Nietzsche committed suicide says a lot, if he was supposed to be one of the most logical and right-thinking people ever.

27) Theists who worship a person who chooses to be invisible or invisible to mainstream scientists cannot be scientists, nor can any who disbelieve any of the 21 things in this list. Stated another way: Religion isn’t compatible with science.

No evidence for this belief, mountains of obvious against it: at least 40% of the people who are employed as scientists in the world are religious, and the majority of inventions in the world, or the components (which are also inventions) that make up those inventions, are religious people. Even if it were a smaller number at this time, the fact is: most of the kinds of types inventions ever made, were made by religious people, or those living in a mostly religious environment. Rarely if ever is something new come up with these days, let alone something very useful or affordable, let alone by a mainstream scientist. Even if something is, it’s often hidden from the public or ignored by other mainstream scientists in favor of things which already exist or inferior things.

28) Disorder can produce order (for example the “Big Bang” or explosions can result in Earth with all the life in it and all the countless ordered complexity with all it’s countless types of beautiful features and emotions.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

29) Low order can produce higher order (like how disorder can produce order).

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

30) Governments can’t keep secrets for longer than 40 years.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

31) Governments have never conspired against their citizens

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

32) Governments can’t conspire against their citizens.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

33) You should doubt (be skeptical of) whatever you hear and see, especially those who make claims against Mainstream Science.

Why? Why not just use “science” to see if a thing is true without making up your mind first? Why assume? Is assuming scientific? Presuming and assuming are stupid and evil and anti-scientific. To teach a child to doubt everything except mainstream science sets them up for a pathological disorder like Insanity of Doubt, a mental disorder which Mainstreamers managed to erase from the psychology field. They are even trying to get rid of narcissism as a disorder, using the excuse that “it’s common,” which is not a logical reason. Child abuse is common, that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be looked at as illogical or immoral or be seen as good even. Something also to note is that “Skeptics” in ancient times were a group of pagan truth seekers. Mainstreamers however have hijacked it and made their own dishonest version of this group. Insanity of Doubt can lead to illogical behaviors, for example not doing something which is logical because you doubt it is logical and that you will be vilified, mocked, harassed or killed for doing the right thing. Teaching people to be skeptical leads them to develop a pathological avoidance of doing what is morally correct and logical, which includes learning what is morally correct and logical, let alone being moral and logical, out of fear of the previously mentioned things and out of doubt that it is useful to learn them.

34) Anyone who disagrees with mainstream science should be ignored, or laughed at or spoken out against, verbally harassed, lied about, physically abused or murdered.

Hence why many millions have been killed in the past 100 years, since Darwin-worship began. And there’s no evidence for belief 33, and evidence against it. Hence why science has largely stagnated and why little has been advanced in propulsion and energy, and why we are stuck on this pollution-accumulating planet.

35) Less intelligent people should be discriminated against.

Hence why many millions have been killed in the past 100 years, since Darwin-worship began. And there’s no evidence for belief 33, and evidence against it. Hence the Eugenics movement and the many forced sterilizations of Americans in the past.

36) If aliens did make it to Earth they would make it their goal to first meet with the mainstream scientists and peaceful leaders of the world, like President Obama.

Mainstreamers are filled with mentally ill people, and Obama is a big business pandering warmonger, just like the former Bush presidents.

37) The climate is getting more extreme and most of the land might mostly be under water one day, therefore, stop making any carbon dioxide and spend money to do so.

But according to the implication of the Mainstreamer Science religion, we’ll evolve to live under water and some humans will be amphibous with something like gills or some other underwater breathing system, or did you forget your own “scientific” Waterworld movie? And without carbon dioxide all plants will die. If all plants die, about every other living thing would die and all the eart would be desert, mud or rock. I’d rather live under water. It’s also unlikely: With humans needing more and more water, they’d eventually begin mining ice and creating more desalinization plants, and using slave labor if they had to, unless there was something to stop them from doing so, so the water would end up in us, animals, plants, us, goods requiring water and containers, not wasted into the ocean. I bet it would be cheaper and more productive to build nuclear powerplants and nuclear powered drill machines to colonize Antarctica and Greenland and make heat radiating cities to turn the ice and snow into water than can be used for drinking, food and technology. Or is it better for them to remain under ice forever, while the warmer lands gets more expensive and more polluted? No, it’s not better.

38) There are too many humans on the planet, and there should only be allowed to be a billion or less for all time.

There’s no evidence that there are too many humans. There’s plenty of land left to grow food on and plenty of underwater land to build underwater buildings in and we can build colonies on the Moon and Mars and space stations. But the jealous, greedy, pleasure-addicted and God-hating, joy-killing, “if we can’t have fun then no one can” Mainstream Scientists are deliberately discouraging it, which is why it isn’t done, and why everyone is mislead into devoting their money and energy into living only on land, and suffering for it.

In conclusion, mainstream scientists are a willfully ignorant cult who hinder and crush other scientists and threads of other scientific fields without a logic reason, like Medical Scientists and Medical Science and Creation Scientists and Creation Science, and who endanger lives and kill people (over 260,000,000 deaths, millions of whom were unborn babies). They are part of the reason that the public doesn’t have anti-gravity or zero-point energy technology and why there is a constant increasing flow of crime and illogical behavior and increasing pathological mental disorders like narcissism, sociopathism, and psychopathism. Those who support mainstream scientists or their bad logic and propaganda are also part of the reason that these things have happened and are still happening. They are part of the reason that many cures for sicknesses and diseases are suppressed, lost or no longer known about. They are part of the reason millions of children are suffering in the USA and a billion more outside of America. They are part the reason the world is in poverty. The people who fund them are also part of the reason, and the leaders over them, and the leader of them, which is Satan.

They are deliberately ignorant of and fight against and shun the facts, including what correct morality is (obedience to whatever laws Jesus said are still to be obeyed) when they see it. Therefore, they should be fought against and shunned and not be given any funding. They are a hypocritical, deceptive, misleading, body-destroying, parasitic cult just like Karl Marx cults, Scientology, Raeleanism and other UFO cults. Those who are against Mainstreamers should set up their own.

Note: Michio and Einstein are not atheists, nor do they fit perfectly into Maintream Scientism because of this, though the Mainstream Media, who have the same leaders as the MS’s, try to spin them as being Mainstreamers. Spinoza, who some might consider one of the gods of Mainstreamers, also was not an atheist. All three believe God caused and directed the formation of the universe. Michio speaks through Einstein to let the world know this, and to keep his job and Mainstreamers from harassing him. I also have not said that all Mainstreamers are equally bad, and hate God so much that they can feel that hatred. Some hate him, but don’t think about him, and so their hatred is like someone who hates a person that they don’t think about.

These are a list of prominent scientists who are either haven’t conformed to the Mainstream Science or who are not promoters of atheism (which is done by the most hardened Mainstreamers), but who haven’t been rejected by them (probably because these scientists have so much credentials and credibility with the masses that to do so would causes mainstream scientists to be seen for what they really are: an extremist anti-God cult, and then rejected by most people):

Arthur C. Clark (whose faith wavered about God’s existence and who wouldn’t mock those who weren’t Mainstreamers, at least not in an obvious way)
Albert Einstein (a deist creationist, whose “scientific” theory was unfortunately has been a great hindrance to science and religion, and one of the greatest next to Darwinian Evolutionary Theory and Freudian Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy)
Michio Kaku (who said on Coast to Coats AM, “the Bible is a scientific book”)
William R. Corliss (who points out how evolutionists ignore “ooparts” and make absurd reasons for it)
Maurice Allais
Stanton Friedman (who points out the absurd reasons Mainstreamers use to explain away the significance of UFOs)
Stephen Hawking (a prominent handicapped physicist who is against atheism, though still panders to atheists)
Thomas Edison (a creationist, but was also a schemer with little conscience)
Dr. Andrew Wakefield (a British former surgeon and medical researcher known for his independant exposure of the causative connection between the measles, mumps and the rubella (MMR) vaccine, autism and autistic enterocolitis. The hypocrite Mainstream Science Cult, atheist, liberal, frauds of Wikipedia and Conservapedia libel him as being a fraud based on a fraudulent news report from the Sunday Times reporter Brian Deer and the British General Medical Council (more Mainstreamers)).
Dr. Paul Connett (a Professor of Chemistry at St. Lawrence University who is an anti-fluoride activist who protests against the fluoridated public water supplies being forced on the public)
Michael Behe (a famous scientists whose book Darwin’s Black Box caused a huge controversy when it showed flaws in Darwinian beliefs)
Here is a huge list of scientists who are opposed to the physics knowledge filter caused by the Big Bang Propgandists: http://www.cosmologystatement.org
Martin Fleischmann ()
Dr. Stanley Pons ()
Bockris
Dr. Claude Allegre (“a top geophysicist and French Socialist who has authored more than 100 scientific articles and written 11 books and received numerous scientific awards including the Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical Society of the United States, converted from climate alarmist to skeptic in 2006”)
Bruno Wiskel (a geologist “of the University of Alberta recently reversed his view of man-made climate change and instead became a global warming skeptic. Wiskel was once such a big believer in man-made global warming that he set out to build a “Kyoto house” in honor of the UN sanctioned Kyoto Protocol which was signed in 1997”)

Here is a huge list of scientists opposed to the knowledge filter caused by Global Warming Propagandists:

There is also a famous writer, science educator, teacher, and philosopher named Loren Eiseley, who is not rejected by Mainstream Scientists, and he exposed Darwin as a credit thief who took most of his evolution theory from others, and changed it (by removing God) and adding that animals could turn into other animals or new kinds of animals (“species” was the word he used for “kind”, but confusingly it can also mean “type” and the word continues to be used ambiguously by Mainstreamers to this day).

Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called “consensus” on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.

The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007.

Even some in the establishment media now appear to be taking notice of the growing number of skeptical scientists. In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics “appear to be expanding rather than shrinking.” Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears “bite the dust.” (LINK) In addition, many scientists who are also progressive environmentalists believe climate fear promotion has “co-opted” the green movement. (LINK)

This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate.

Many of the scientists featured in this report consistently stated that numerous colleagues shared their views, but they will not speak out publicly for fear of retribution. Atmospheric scientist Dr. Nathan Paldor, Professor of Dynamical Meteorology and Physical Oceanography at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, author of almost 70 peer-reviewed studies, explains how many of his fellow scientists have been intimidated.

“Many of my colleagues with whom I spoke share these views and report on their inability to publish their skepticism in the scientific or public media,” Paldor wrote. – Source

Categories: Pseudoscience, Skepticism, skeptics Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,