Concerning the behavior of the so called bad cops, of which there are endless amounts among the few decent cops I’ve encountered, and decent doesn’t mean “let’s you go no matter what”, I’m not a moron or sociopath aka psychopath, don’t make assumptions about me:
Being that liberals dominate America, and even conservative cops, if such exist, must fall in line with liberal laws like upholding hate crimes laws, a liberal invention, not that all cops enforce them or actually care, and doing such has a liberal influence on any supposed conservative cops — and being that liberalism and similar views had a very early and strong increasing influence on America including during the segregation days — do you not think there is a correlation between increasing genuine HATE crimes by cops against anyone and everyone, and by hate, I mean any hateful behavior, because, oh God how dare I point it out: anything can be a hate crime, it’s not exclusive to precious gays, blacks and blah blah, you can kick cats because you hate them, yet no one makes laws defending cats under “hate crimes”, hypocrites. But back to corrupt police being hired, YOU are the ones hiring them, you are the ones letting endless immoral lying wannabe cops become cops, it’s not libertarians or fundamentalist Christians doing the hiring, so how can you Conservatives that side with Arminiastic Christianity and Catholicism pretend Calvinists are dangerous extremists, blasphemers, and how can you liberals who lump unknowingly Calvinists in with anyone you think is a “fundamentalist” (which in your culture you define as a literalist who believes in the dominant traditional interpretations of Scripture and in your ignorance lump in Calvinist (a type of Protestant) views in with Catholic (despite them being eternal enemies in various core teachings) blame them? Now you can put blame on Catholics, who dominate the world so much so there are over a billion of them of various types, liberal and conservative (hardly unified then, Catholics), because as Calvinists may point out now and then, Catholics are heretics who teach evil things, a wrong way to Heaven that leads not just to Hell, but makes the person who was converted worse off, because rather than being able to claim to God on Judgment Day, “I was ignorant, never read the Bible or much of it, didn’t hear much preaching, didn’t see any hint of what being a true Christian was like”, instead it will be the opposite to varying degrees. God will point out that they did have strong warnings of what was true.
Simply put: It is Calvinists or fundamentalist PROTESTANTS (conservative Christians of the non-Catholic type) running the show as you might put it, or the liberals and the conservatives (and if you hadn’t noticed, many conservatives are hypocrites who though blabbing about their Methodist or Catholic or Anglican church, HARDLY stay true to the Bible and rather get twisted up in political wranglings and babble to Christians directing it to THEIR OWN TYPE OF PEOPLE (not the rare Calvinist type that disgust them, the GENUINE fundamentalist Christians) to get their support, OR is the LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES that dominate government who have created laws and an environment leading to endless police corruption? Who do you think is screening those applying to be cops, is it CALVINISTS who teach that God destines you to Heaven or Hell, who oppose homosexuality, and strictly teach that God must be obeyed to the letter to have consistent blessings which at least and surely will be fulfilled after death or upon Christ’s return, who oppose getting tied up in politics and wordly struggles (like where such and such building should be built or if at all, if a new Starbucks is needed around the corner to attract more narcissists to the neighborhood), or are the screeners liberal, or conservative, or both?
SO, please please please liberals and conservative and liberal Catholics, Methodists, Anglicans, Episcopalians, Lutherans, please stop lumping in Calvinists of the Presbyterian and Baptist and possibly Lutheran branches into your “it’s your fault the world is so miserable” comments. It’s little better than blaming all Israeli’s and all Jews for the problems of the world. Of course, some Jews cause problems and they can have far reaching effects, but so can a rich person of any race and there are many super rich people of races other than Jews who make life miserable for the majority by hoarding their wealth and living off the interest from it rather than sharing and helping the needy out, I don’t mean helping out druggies and drunks who hide their sociopathy or narcissists pretending to be normal under the guise of being addicted or victims of the world, but decent people in need who really are victims of some type, or disabled in various ways or some severe way.
Now of course guess what the liberals or conservatives who hate the true Christian types will say who read this article and get the point? Being that they hate God and the important truths in life, they will, true to their evil and addiction to evil say, “Oh, so stranger/s to reality, you who claim to have the truth unlike us, are you saying you should be our judges, you cultists?! Hah! We’re in charge, deal with it!” And as an atheist scientist whether of China, Russia or America might reason when serious flaws are pointed out in their evolution theories, global warming / climate change claims or pretend heliocentrism based and Big Bang based astronomy and theoretical physics, “We’re still learning/evolving/getting better/weeding out the flaws with peer review/it’s working you science haters!” You’re gonna take how much longer to learn not to hire corrupt police? You’re gonna make sure no “good cops” go bad HOW? Two hundred years later and two hundred years more of non-stop police harassment every hour in every city and town HOW? You’re deluded if that’s what you think. AND NO: I DID NOT AND AM NOT IMPLYING TO HIRE POLICE ON THE BASIS THAT THEY HATE HOMOSEXUALS OR ATHEISTS OR CATHOLICS; Calvinism does not exclude or oppose and requires “Love your neighbor as yourself” and to forgive till God says to stop and to do to others as you’d have done to you.
LISTEN: Insane people repeat their mistakes, a good person repeatedly does good and tries not to do evil, not so that they merely appear to be good and/or to gain an advantage by making friends for their personal gain, but because they love to do good and love God. If you can’t tell a good from evil person, pray to God about that, and pray to know who God actually is and what he is truly like.
Have a nice day, or next day.
Can you give me a good reason why animal shelters in Nevada do not respect owner rights:
2. Why if you liberals are adamantly pro choice do you not respect pet owner rights to not have their pets cut up, spayed and neutered?
3. Why is poverty not considered when making a price for getting your animal back?
5. Why is WHERE YOU LIVE not considered, as in if you even live in Nevada or another country and were merely visiting or are not there by convenience, but forced to stay from poverty?
6. Why must I be forced to pay a fee to do not work on my cats, that is to not surgically alter them, spay, neuter? Shouldn’t I pay for work done, not a hypothetical that they will produce unwanted cats as if I might be a future criminal and want to live in this disgusting state and produce them here and as if any cat produced is a burden and worthless?
7. What EXACTLY is your definitive scientific logically explainable evidence for there being “CAT OVERPOPULATION”, what does “I see cats outside” mean, little ones? What does, “Well they kill lots of birds” mean in scientific formulas? What’s it mean to God or evolution? Or how about gods and godesses. Is there some rule or law in science or spiritual whatever somewhere that demands cats and dogs be neutered or so called “fixed” because someone feels there is too many, or says so, or because YOU CHOOSE TO PUT YOUR MONEY INTO CAPTURING AND KEEPING ANY AND EVERY CAT AND DOG PUT TO YOU? Are you forced to do that or to use tax payer money up like that? Please tell me in a mainstream scientific way and avoiding any logical fallacies as Aristotle the pagan formulated, otherwise I’ll ignore your response to that question. Please don’t reply with, “but don’t you care”? That will tell me you didn’t read this entire message.
8. Why, if no one in the entire state of Nevada when I begged you repeatedly and tried selling off all my valuables and extremely cheap prices and offered to repay a very small loan should it matter to you then if I take revenge on your disgusting laws to ignore owner rights and LOGIC with regard to spay and neuter?
9. What do you think of my response to you trying to force your religious “ethics” on others, your opinions on these matters, and due to your callousness as I’ve pointed out in keeping someone else’s pets or animals or service animals (and remember what God says in the Bible when you find someone else’s animal? It doesn’t say keep it till they pay a care fee or for cutting it’s balls off): In response to you being heartless petty disrespectful careless flippant hyporites, if I wage war on your immoral forced opinions, your bashing it on them opinions/laws by going to China and the Koreas and any other country to start dog and cat cloning businesses to make such meat cheap, especially for the poor hungry humans who cannot afford much meat, let alone those types? Because that is where you’ve put me by doing this to my cats, the loves of my life, I will wage war on your stupid opinions and make them backfire in your face.I WILL DO EVERYTHING I CAN TO MAKE CAT AND DOG CLONING BUSINESSES FOR ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING INCLUDING MAKING FUR CLOTHING. Good riddance to you hypocrites, go down in history as shameful blights in the universe, your hypocrisy backfiring in your face forever. You shit on my daughters, back at your kids and your stupid opinions.
One more question: Liberals, and ocd fixing people, why aren’t you capturing pigeons and spaying and neutering them or putting down dirty ones? There’s so much tax payer money, and are pigeons, THE BIRDS not worth as much as cats and dogs?! I thought you’re trying to save them from cats?
See, LISTEN: When you cut into a cat or dog or anyone else’s pet or service animal without their permission who have done no wrong to you or that animal or any wrong that justifies that act, you’re doing it to the owner too. You’re cutting them, and I will bring that back to you, Lord willing. You think that that is loving your neighbor as yourself, and doing to others as you would have them do to you? Then offer yourselves for sterilization to me freely, don’t resist me if I come for you to prevent you from your overpopulation of this planet, you bullies, extorters, animal hoarders, you makers of cheap arguments that can just as easily be used against you, you control freaks and kidnappers.
Pray I get my cats back, happy and unmolested and intact and that the evil you intended for them doesn’t fall on you.
God bless you hypocrites, bless you.
And it allowed a stupid “Paula” to make a stupid and worthless comment:
“This makes as much sense as anything in the bible.”
What did I say?:
“A silly legend. I’ll stick with my eternal God who made and rules the omniverse and will one day bring salvation to all those who loved truth, justice and mercy, and eternal sorrow and destruction to those who hated or ignored it in their addiction to pleasure, or pride or concern more for their own temporary life than God’s eternal will, which if followed, brings eternal contentment and joy.
@Paula “This makes as much sense as anything in the bible.” said the religious ignoramus who couldn’t figure out what
Don’t make or worship imaginary gods:
Don’t use the name Yahweh in vain
Remember the sabbath, that God made the universe in five days and rested on the sixth,
Don’t bear false testimony,
Don’t commit adultery,
Honor your parents,
Don’t covet what belongs to your neighbor,
The Lord your God is one, love him with all your heart and mind,
Love your neighbor as yourself,
Do to others as you would have them do to you,
Oh, so nonsensical Paula. Truly the nonsensical ones are people like you, who hatefully parrot, who smugly make attacks because it merely feels good. Evil is what you are for denying what is clearly sensible and obviously good.
Now do tell us queen Paula what is your list of good to compare to the one God gave us more than 2000 years ago Miss “I Invented The Real Wheel, Ignore That Thing Over there Which The World Has Been Using and Advancing With for 2000 Years”? You are blinded by Satan and love ignorance.”
Will the liberal, atheist Smithsonian allow my comments? According to smug liberals, they are fair and tolerant of all religions and of all religions too, except to those which say homosexuality is wrong (and why just that, I imagine because it reflects their thought that perversion is a holy and sacred thing, and is one of those things which expresses their deepest hatred of God).
Find out at http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/The-Little-Known-Legend-of-Jesus-in-Japan-183833821.html
(Continued from the previous post):
In order of what seemed to be most relevant (in my opinion):
According to “The New Liberalism” “liberalism was strategically misrepresented libertinism” by unnamed persons, so for all anyone knows this is just a delusion or lie by the writer who himself recognizes a real connection.
According to “The New Revolution: Libertine Liberal vs Classic Liberal”:
There is a difference between “liberal” and “libertine”. We have, in the course of many social revolutions, struggled to define that line with varying degrees of success. “Libertine” behavior has and will always be looked upon askance because the connotation of “libertine” means the breakdown of society and the breakdown of society has not always been for the good of society. “Libertine” is to be free, not only in thought and expression, but from morality and societal norms. “Liberal” is to believe in and support the idealism of freedom of thought and expression, but to lend it support from a moral base.
Therein lies our problem with modern day definition of the term “liberal”. Somewhere around 1967 the term “liberal” became confused with the “libertine” revolution of the counter culture. While the movement began in the grandest of idealism of freedom and equality for minorities, retaining its “liberal” idealism for a time, it quickly slipped its anchorage and drifted resolutely towards the “libertine”.
My thoughts on “Liberal” is to believe in and support the idealism of freedom of thought and expression, but to lend it support from a moral base.” is that it sounds like to me, “Liberalism is libertinism only with the attempt to justify it using morals” which is an obvious contradiction. It seems analogous to me like saying (without the pretentious “idealism” word), “Liberalism is the belief that you should be able to think whatever you feel like without being punished, and studying how to justify this belief using current (Christian?) morals or believing that they are (for what reason?)”. Therefore, liberalism is the belief that you should be able to think (what about “and feel”?) whatever you want to, from abusing and raping, torturing and murdering for fun, to imagine and express with delight abusing kids and the destruction of all moral beings with the justification for doing so with (Christian?) morality. This is obviously a contradictory belief system, just like Hinduism with it’s original practices of widow-burning and ritualistic murder of strangers/travelers yet claiming that it’s about enlightening yourself by avoiding “evil”, and not saying what “evil” is.
Strangely, Wikipedia (which says a libertine is a person without morals) has a hidden key phrase on its libertinism entry: “Classical liberalism”. Being that Wikipedia is controlled by liberals (the head being the liberal and atheist Jimmy/Jimbo Wales (who also apparently has narcissism disorder), it’s obvious to me why they would hide saying that liberalism was based on immorality. Why they would hide the phrase though, is something I don’t understand, though I can imagine a demon was mocking God in a connivingly and malicious way, by possessing someone and getting them to place that hint. I tried to see if the phrase was simply an outdated Google result by looking at Google’s cache, but found nothing. The Classical Liberalism entry also makes no connection. The only page in which the two are mentioned together is the Individualism page (which by the way is worded pretentiously and not something a “lay person” could easily understand).
Side note: To my surprise I found out that John Calvin had interacted with and spoke against “libertines” (1)(2)(3), surprised because that man figures prominently in my life, and just didn’t think it would have anything to do with him.
The sad thing is is that “libertine” would best have been associated with Christianity, especially Catholics who became true Christians after being freed from Roman Catholicism, but “freethinkers” (many of whom seem to be atheists) messed that up, just like they did with the words “free”, “liberal*”, “science” and “skeptic” (1)(2). They also try to do this with logical fallacies (which has to do with philosophy). The only atheist I can think of who made a decent contribution to any of these fields is Bertrand Russel for philosophy and Tesla for electronics and engineering. Mark Twain contributed to humor.
*The link to the word liberal (above) links to a blog on the ancient meaning of the word liberal and uses a certain word for a certain male private part that some may consider offensive.