Posts Tagged ‘liberalism’

How Liberalism Is Rapidly Destroying THE WORLD, not just America

November 20, 2015 Leave a comment

First of all what exactly is liberalism?:

Wikipedia uses a reference at the top of it’s article on Liberalism that says,

“Liberalism in the United States is a broad political philosophy centered on the unalienable rights of the individual. The fundamental liberal ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion for all belief systems, and the separation of church and state, right to due process, and equality under the law are widely accepted as a common foundation across the spectrum of liberal thought.

Modern liberalism in the United States includes issues such as same-sex marriage, voting rights for all adult citizens, civil rights, environmental justice, and government protection of freedom from want.”

And this is why that is stupid and hypocritical:

Liberalism is not BROAD as it claims, those who are actually liberals are hypocrites who by trying to enforce liberalism are enforcing a religion of a type on those who have anti-liberal religions! FURTHER, just as liberal scientists use double speak and word obfuscation (when using words like “science”, “evolve”, “theory”, “religion”, “peer review”, “scientist”) to fool people into thinking they are teaching and only teach legitimate science (like relativity, evolution, heliocentrism, long term climate change prediction, big bangism, liberal-biased, anti-Christian archeology). For example when they say, “we’re for the same rights for all!”, no they aren’t for “all”, liberals are anti-fundamentalist Christian and would discriminate against them, they always do, it’s obvious, they deny it at times in stupidity and their evil stubbornness to cause hardships for those who point out their hypocrisy. When they refer to “science” they mean science that liberals approve of, not science that creationists for example claim is correct science, or so called “young earth creationists”). Liberals, when they claim to be “the truth” so to speak are no different than Satan when he pretends to be the truth in place of Christ. BUT, how specifically does liberalism “destroy”?

1. It causes strife because liberalism is not logical and a certain degree of logic is needed for peace enough that actual progress in anything takes place, especially having peace with God and ultimately leading to eternal life from Him

2. It perpetuates sin by promoting sinful speech and acts. Disobeying God does not lead to any lasting peace, it can be a temporary band aid but it doesn’t last long before it falls off and the wound is exposed and gets infected even worse.

3. It’s adherents and preachers strive over stupid things that waste time and money trying to accomplish.

Very specifically this is how liberalism is causing mass-time and money-waste and mass strife among those they keep trying to convince to go along with their striving:

1. Spaying and neutering every cat and dog except for those LIBERALS who can afford a license to breed. However liberal “extremists” so called like PETA would instead prevent anyone from owning any animal at all and have them instead killed or put into the wild somewhere or just to wander around wherever or even force humans to move so no cats get run over where humans live.

2. Trying to deny anyone except LIBERAL police and the military or anyone at all the use of guns, a futile thing to try because though it may be that in certain cultures in the world guns disappear, others who have the power and guns will not allow themselves to be disarmed except to the death, people so powerful they’d instead poison the well by firing nuclear missiles to trigger a world wide nuclear and EMP war so that everyone eventually dies from radiation poisoning and lack of working electronics.

3. Pushing homosexuality so hard and trying to make it so attractive and even among children that just as with mass spaying and neutering causing the extinction of all humans. If everyone turned gay, evolving to be gay, and suddenly there were massive disease out breaks or nuclear wars everywhere, WHO, WHAT would survive, especially if homosex had been going on for so long that there was negative population growth, and so long even that there were only a few million humans left, and only around because they were being cloned?

4. Denying the right to eat any kind of animal (however some liberals especially atheists don’t care what you eat, and might even let you literally eat parts of their body) like dogs, cats or parrots, because to many liberals the animal matters more or is equal to a human, even a stupid angry cat that is genetically programmed or neurologically wired so that it’s easily angered and making a bad animal. Stupid people would tell you that a cat that is always angry around humans even when it was raised kindly by them is still a good cat. No, it isn’t, it’s stupid and angry over nothing, just as a human would be called stupid and bad if as a child it cried over and got angry over small things all the time or things a person is not supposed to get upset over, like sharing food when you have plenty. SO, say someone is starving wherever and no thanks to liberal stinginess and bad rules, liberals won’t allow you to just catch or kill some wild cat or dog to eat, they’d rather you starve and end up begging till cops arrest you and send you to jail and cause you to live in an endless cycle of being jailed and getting warrants for not showing back up to court to tell the judge you’re not a beggar anymore or for not paying a fine for begging. Or still some security guard assaults and robs you and trespasses you till you have to live as a thief or in an entirely different state and go through it all again. Better the liberal will tell you, to starve to death than disobey liberal rules and the inalienable rights of, stupid angry cats (even if they are “overpopulating” the world as many liberals claim they are, so much so that they absolutely must be spayed no matter how well behaved or how rare their heat cycles are or how long they last).

5. Denying the right to own or use various types of weapons for self defense or hunting (from bass knuckles to cross bows to knives over some length like oh God no! “3 inches” (maybe it’s a phallic insecurity of some kind), like of course, any gun. “We can all just live on tofu, seaweed, tumeric and carrots” some would say, ignoring that sometimes animals like deer, wolves or bear can become so numerous they can start attacking humans for food or spread massive disease outbreaks). Or some will say it’s unfair to an animal if you hunt it with a crossbow because… and give you some illogical reason for it. Of course if a liberal cop needs a gun to take down a Christian who is making gays feel bad and causing them to feel bullied by reading certain verses of the Bible, that’s okay, or to crucify the Christian with a cross weapon till the Christian turns gay and admits he’s not worth anything even after becoming gay and should just hang there till vultures tell him he’s not even worth eating and the sun tells him he’s not worth drying out and bacteria shun even eating him so that he hangs there for eternity in a kind of Hell for making the perfectly behaved homosexuals who never do wrong to anyone else feel bad.

6. Attempting to cause everyone to abandon traditional interpretations of the Bible to the point where the Bible only teaches according to liberals: liberalism. Any other interpretation they would say is evil and hateful and even if correct they would say is out dated and should not be read anymore (similar to their claim that the Bible is not something to read or bother understanding because books were removed from it and verses changed, verses that really say, “It’s okay to be gay and liberal and love Miley Cyrus and Lady Gaggag for their stupidity, time and money-wasting, because it’s not really wasting anything, they’re useful for bettering technology, science and morality and having more fun most of all!”). Yeah, that was taken out… Oh wait no, it was the verse that said, “Alien reptiles are ruining the world and they push conservatism or Christianity to harm homosexuals, heroine addicts, atheists and liberals.” I’m being constructively sarcastic for those of you who can’t tell. Obviously such teachings never existed in the Bible, anyone who tried to put them in there was simply trying and could never succeed, you can lie and deceive but in the end God will expose all the lies and show everyone the truth.

7. Preventing child labor except when it comes to modeling and acting (and in both the modeling and acting industries liberals are often caught or rumored to be molesting kids, the same liberals and gays among them who explode at those who claim to desire “straight sex” with kids or who have it). So it comes back to liberals being hypocrites and having perverse agendas in their rules. There is nothing wrong with a child working for money or goods or services in general, just as with an adult, what is wrong is abusing either the child or adult, the end. But liberals are stupid and self defeating and plagued with narcissist adherents making up stupid rules out of their mental illness. While other countries are making huge profits off their kids, America barely progresses in getting wealthier and in MOST places loses money as their kids and older youths waste time babbling in McDonalds or wherever, putting graffiti on buildings, bullying someone, skateboarding till they can’t have kids anymore or injuring someone or stealing something from a store or someone’s bike.

8. Preventing business and technological expansion by preventing oil drilling.

9. Encouraging bad religions (and yes that means anything other than fundamental Christianity), especially Catholicism and Islam and that mind-blanker “Buddhism”.

10. Encouraging time wasting activities like “high art” and on and on and on rather than work that leads to progress in technology, wealth-gain, understanding (like in math, biology, mechanics or physics), and goodness.

11. Another problem that American liberalism creates is conflict with other countries, even with atheistic countries where you’d think American liberalism would be accepted since it promotes either atheism or paganism, but other countries even though atheist or atheist-dominated are not all as stupid as American liberals as to accept all their “ideals”. So for example atheist-dominated China which has some liberal rules is not entirely stupid enough to allow homosexuality and pornography to become something widely accepted. However I have no doubt that all the Christian-hating countries of the world, will become at least as bad as American liberals eventually and in many places as bad as violent Muslims willing to blow themselves up for whatever reason.

12. How an liberals claim to be for personal human rights when of all the humans to ignore the personal rights of, they do so to the unborn and encourage murdering them in cruel and unusual ways, even profit off selling body parts from them? No wonder that if they have no respect for the unborn they have little respect for guarding the sanity of kids by training them up into a correct sexual mindset, and instead want it to be perverted despite their supposed claims of not wanting kids to be sexually confused. Liberals are for aborting the babies of the poor and elitist white liberals for aborting the babies of blacks and other minorities in their belief that besides these races being inferior but that there are too many people populating the planet in general, however I believe some use that teaching of overpopulation as an excuse to get rid of races they see as inferior or ugly and some wanting to get rid of them because of racist feelings. Of course many liberals will claim that it’s the conservatives who are racist, I believe there are many racist conservatives too, but how can a culture as corrupt as the liberal one be any more free of racism? Impossible! But back to the point I meant to get at: Liberals are murderers or encourage murder and of one of the worst types. The next step for them is to encourage the murder of Christians, the kind they call fundamentalists, and I don’t mean Catholics of which many are liberals.

It’s not just liberals ruining the world obviously, it is conservatives too, many who are just as greedy for money as liberals and just as cold to the poor, just as willing to make war with “barbarians” like the Native Americans (especially Muslims) for American profit or their rich white friends overseas.

And so the liberals and conservatives want to say:

“Oh so you can do better by ruling over us you who damn either side!? You want to have a theocracy over us and you telling us what God wants you hateful little person?” Here’s God’s reply:

“A man of noble birth went to a distant country to have himself appointed king and then to return. 13 So he called ten of his servants and gave them ten minas.[a] ‘Put this money to work,’ he said, ‘until I come back.’

14 “But his subjects hated him and sent a delegation after him to say, ‘We don’t want this man to be our king.’

15 “He was made king, however, and returned home. Then he sent for the servants to whom he had given the money, in order to find out what they had gained with it.

16 “The first one came and said, ‘Sir, your mina has earned ten more.’

17 “‘Well done, my good servant!’ his master replied. ‘Because you have been trustworthy in a very small matter, take charge of ten cities.’

18 “The second came and said, ‘Sir, your mina has earned five more.’

19 “His master answered, ‘You take charge of five cities.’

20 “Then another servant came and said, ‘Sir, here is your mina; I have kept it laid away in a piece of cloth. 21 I was afraid of you, because you are a hard man. You take out what you did not put in and reap what you did not sow.’

22 “His master replied, ‘I will judge you by your own words, you wicked servant! You knew, did you, that I am a hard man, taking out what I did not put in, and reaping what I did not sow? 23 Why then didn’t you put my money on deposit, so that when I came back, I could have collected it with interest?’

24 “Then he said to those standing by, ‘Take his mina away from him and give it to the one who has ten minas.’

25 “‘Sir,’ they said, ‘he already has ten!’

26 “He replied, ‘I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what they have will be taken away. 27 But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them—bring them here and kill them in front of me.’” – NIV

Police Corruption: A Question for Liberals and Conservatives and Notice to Libertarians

November 17, 2015 Leave a comment

Concerning the behavior of the so called bad cops, of which there are endless amounts among the few decent cops I’ve encountered, and decent doesn’t mean “let’s you go no matter what”, I’m not a moron or sociopath aka psychopath, don’t make assumptions about me:

Being that liberals dominate America, and even conservative cops, if such exist, must fall in line with liberal laws like upholding hate crimes laws, a liberal invention, not that all cops enforce them or actually care, and doing such has a liberal influence on any supposed conservative cops — and being that liberalism and similar views had a very early and strong increasing influence on America including during the segregation days — do you not think there is a correlation between increasing genuine HATE crimes by cops against anyone and everyone, and by hate, I mean any hateful behavior, because, oh God how dare I point it out: anything can be a hate crime, it’s not exclusive to precious gays, blacks and blah blah, you can kick cats because you hate them, yet no one makes laws defending cats under “hate crimes”, hypocrites. But back to corrupt police being hired, YOU are the ones hiring them, you are the ones letting endless immoral lying wannabe cops become cops, it’s not libertarians or fundamentalist Christians doing the hiring, so how can you Conservatives that side with Arminiastic Christianity and Catholicism pretend Calvinists are dangerous extremists, blasphemers, and how can you liberals who lump unknowingly Calvinists in with anyone you think is a “fundamentalist” (which in your culture you define as a literalist who believes in the dominant traditional interpretations of Scripture and in your ignorance lump in Calvinist (a type of Protestant) views in with Catholic (despite them being eternal enemies in various core teachings) blame them? Now you can put blame on Catholics, who dominate the world so much so there are over a billion of them of various types, liberal and conservative (hardly unified then, Catholics), because as Calvinists may point out now and then, Catholics are heretics who teach evil things, a wrong way to Heaven that leads not just to Hell, but makes the person who was converted worse off, because rather than being able to claim to God on Judgment Day, “I was ignorant, never read the Bible or much of it, didn’t hear much preaching, didn’t see any hint of what being a true Christian was like”, instead it will be the opposite to varying degrees. God will point out that they did have strong warnings of what was true.

Simply put: It is Calvinists or fundamentalist PROTESTANTS (conservative Christians of the non-Catholic type) running the show as you might put it, or the liberals and the conservatives (and if you hadn’t noticed, many conservatives are hypocrites who though blabbing about their Methodist or Catholic or Anglican church, HARDLY stay true to the Bible and rather get twisted up in political wranglings and babble to Christians directing it to THEIR OWN TYPE OF PEOPLE (not the rare Calvinist type that disgust them, the GENUINE fundamentalist Christians) to get their support, OR is the LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES that dominate government who have created laws and an environment leading to endless police corruption? Who do you think is screening those applying to be cops, is it CALVINISTS who teach that God destines you to Heaven or Hell, who oppose homosexuality, and strictly teach that God must be obeyed to the letter to have consistent blessings which at least and surely will be fulfilled after death or upon Christ’s return, who oppose getting tied up in politics and wordly struggles (like where such and such building should be built or if at all, if a new Starbucks is needed around the corner to attract more narcissists to the neighborhood), or are the screeners liberal, or conservative, or both?

SO, please please please liberals and conservative and liberal Catholics, Methodists, Anglicans, Episcopalians, Lutherans, please stop lumping in Calvinists of the Presbyterian and Baptist and possibly Lutheran branches into your “it’s your fault the world is so miserable” comments. It’s little better than blaming all Israeli’s and all Jews for the problems of the world. Of course, some Jews cause problems and they can have far reaching effects, but so can a rich person of any race and there are many super rich people of races other than Jews who make life miserable for the majority by hoarding their wealth and living off the interest from it rather than sharing and helping the needy out, I don’t mean helping out druggies and drunks who hide their sociopathy or narcissists pretending to be normal under the guise of being addicted or victims of the world, but decent people in need who really are victims of some type, or disabled in various ways or some severe way.

Now of course guess what the liberals or conservatives who hate the true Christian types will say who read this article and get the point? Being that they hate God and the important truths in life, they will, true to their evil and addiction to evil say, “Oh, so stranger/s to reality, you who claim to have the truth unlike us, are you saying you should be our judges, you cultists?! Hah! We’re in charge, deal with it!” And as an atheist scientist whether of China, Russia or America might reason when serious flaws are pointed out in their evolution theories, global warming / climate change claims or pretend heliocentrism based and Big Bang based astronomy and theoretical physics, “We’re still learning/evolving/getting better/weeding out the flaws with peer review/it’s working you science haters!” You’re gonna take how much longer to learn not to hire corrupt police? You’re gonna make sure no “good cops” go bad HOW? Two hundred years later and two hundred years more of non-stop police harassment every hour in every city and town HOW? You’re deluded if that’s what you think. AND NO: I DID NOT AND AM NOT IMPLYING TO HIRE POLICE ON THE BASIS THAT THEY HATE HOMOSEXUALS OR ATHEISTS OR CATHOLICS; Calvinism does not exclude or oppose and requires “Love your neighbor as yourself” and to forgive till God says to stop and to do to others as you’d have done to you.

LISTEN: Insane people repeat their mistakes, a good person repeatedly does good and tries not to do evil, not so that they merely appear to be good and/or to gain an advantage by making friends for their personal gain, but because they love to do good and love God. If you can’t tell a good from evil person, pray to God about that, and pray to know who God actually is and what he is truly like.

Have a nice day, or next day.

Hi liberals and spay and neuter obsessed morons, question/s for you

November 7, 2015 Leave a comment

Can you give me a good reason why animal shelters in Nevada do not respect owner rights:

1. Why if my cat is chipped are they going to give it away after the third day?
2. Why if you liberals are adamantly pro choice do you not respect pet owner rights to not have their pets cut up, spayed and neutered?
3. Why is poverty not considered when making a price for getting your animal back?
5. Why is WHERE YOU LIVE not considered, as in if you even live in Nevada or another country and were merely visiting or are not there by convenience, but forced to stay from poverty?
6. Why must I be forced to pay a fee to do not work on my cats, that is to not surgically alter them, spay, neuter? Shouldn’t I pay for work done, not a hypothetical that they will produce unwanted cats as if I might be a future criminal and want to live in this disgusting state and produce them here and as if any cat produced is a burden and worthless?
7. What EXACTLY is your definitive scientific logically explainable evidence for there being “CAT OVERPOPULATION”, what does “I see cats outside” mean, little ones? What does, “Well they kill lots of birds” mean in scientific formulas? What’s it mean to God or evolution? Or how about gods and godesses. Is there some rule or law in science or spiritual whatever somewhere that demands cats and dogs be neutered or so called “fixed” because someone feels there is too many, or says so, or because YOU CHOOSE TO PUT YOUR MONEY INTO CAPTURING AND KEEPING ANY AND EVERY CAT AND DOG PUT TO YOU? Are you forced to do that or to use tax payer money up like that? Please tell me in a mainstream scientific way and avoiding any logical fallacies as Aristotle the pagan formulated, otherwise I’ll ignore your response to that question. Please don’t reply with, “but don’t you care”? That will tell me you didn’t read this entire message.
8. Why, if no one in the entire state of Nevada when I begged you repeatedly and tried selling off all my valuables and extremely cheap prices and offered to repay a very small loan should it matter to you then if I take revenge on your disgusting laws to ignore owner rights and LOGIC with regard to spay and neuter?
9. What do you think of my response to you trying to force your religious “ethics” on others, your opinions on these matters, and due to your callousness as I’ve pointed out in keeping someone else’s pets or animals or service animals (and remember what God says in the Bible when you find someone else’s animal? It doesn’t say keep it till they pay a care fee or for cutting it’s balls off): In response to you being heartless petty disrespectful careless flippant hyporites, if I wage war on your immoral forced opinions, your bashing it on them opinions/laws by going to China and the Koreas and any other country to start dog and cat cloning businesses to make such meat cheap, especially for the poor hungry humans who cannot afford much meat, let alone those types? Because that is where you’ve put me by doing this to my cats, the loves of my life, I will wage war on your stupid opinions and make them backfire in your face.I WILL DO EVERYTHING I CAN TO MAKE CAT AND DOG CLONING BUSINESSES FOR ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING INCLUDING MAKING FUR CLOTHING. Good riddance to you hypocrites, go down in history as shameful blights in the universe, your hypocrisy backfiring in your face forever. You shit on my daughters, back at your kids and your stupid opinions.

One more question: Liberals, and ocd fixing people, why aren’t you capturing pigeons and spaying and neutering them or putting down dirty ones? There’s so much tax payer money, and are pigeons, THE BIRDS not worth as much as cats and dogs?! I thought you’re trying to save them from cats?

See, LISTEN: When you cut into a cat or dog or anyone else’s pet or service animal without their permission who have done no wrong to you or that animal or any wrong that justifies that act, you’re doing it to the owner too. You’re cutting them, and I will bring that back to you, Lord willing. You think that that is loving your neighbor as yourself, and doing to others as you would have them do to you? Then offer yourselves for sterilization to me freely, don’t resist me if I come for you to prevent you from your overpopulation of this planet, you bullies, extorters, animal hoarders, you makers of cheap arguments that can just as easily be used against you, you control freaks and kidnappers.

Pray I get my cats back, happy and unmolested and intact and that the evil you intended for them doesn’t fall on you.

God bless you hypocrites, bless you.

Hope you do a uturn on your pet owner violating “laws”, because this post is not a joke, nor mere sarcasm. You don’t have the right to make decisions for those treating their pets right, caring for them. If those pets or animals are being cared for and there’s truly “overpopulation” and those pets are not in some dire danger and whether or not those animals are depressed or not is really not your business, though you can always make an offer to buy them or help out, nosy busy bodies, you have no right to “rescue” them as you would try and rationalize it as.

Smithsonian and “Jesus Died In Japan”

December 29, 2012 Leave a comment

And it allowed a stupid “Paula” to make a stupid and worthless comment:

“This makes as much sense as anything in the bible.”

What did I say?:

“A silly legend. I’ll stick with my eternal God who made and rules the omniverse and will one day bring salvation to all those who loved truth, justice and mercy, and eternal sorrow and destruction to those who hated or ignored it in their addiction to pleasure, or pride or concern more for their own temporary life than God’s eternal will, which if followed, brings eternal contentment and joy.

@Paula “This makes as much sense as anything in the bible.” said the religious ignoramus who couldn’t figure out what

Don’t make or worship imaginary gods:
Don’t use the name Yahweh in vain
Don’t steal
Remember the sabbath, that God made the universe in five days and rested on the sixth,
Don’t bear false testimony,
Don’t commit adultery,
Honor your parents,
Don’t covet what belongs to your neighbor,
The Lord your God is one, love him with all your heart and mind,
Love your neighbor as yourself,
Do to others as you would have them do to you,
Forgive all

Oh, so nonsensical Paula. Truly the nonsensical ones are people like you, who hatefully parrot, who smugly make attacks because it merely feels good. Evil is what you are for denying what is clearly sensible and obviously good.

Now do tell us queen Paula what is your list of good to compare to the one God gave us more than 2000 years ago Miss “I Invented The Real Wheel, Ignore That Thing Over there Which The World Has Been Using and Advancing With for 2000 Years”? You are blinded by Satan and love ignorance.”

Will the liberal, atheist Smithsonian allow my comments? According to smug liberals, they are fair and tolerant of all religions and of all religions too, except to those which say homosexuality is wrong (and why just that, I imagine because it reflects their thought that perversion is a holy and sacred thing, and is one of those things which expresses their deepest hatred of God).

Find out at

The Plain Arrogance of Liberals Like Piers Morgan and Why Gun Banning Is Wrong

December 23, 2012 1 comment

On Twitter:

@piersmorgan “6600 Americans signed the petition to deport me – meaning 311,993,400 clearly want me. Thanks.”

And by that silly logic Piers, 311,993,400 clearly clearly want to have and keep fully automatic guns and see all children abused and turned into psychopathic narcissistic murderers. Only 14% of Americans use Twitter, 311,993,400 clearly aren’t following you. Thanks. Britain banned the narcissist Michael Savage for unpleasant political speech, why not Piers Morgan the pandering narcissist for his speaking out against the law of America?

Retweeted by Piers Morgan: (from “btannebaum”) “I want to sign a petition to end all White House Petitions”.

Meaning you’re an illogical contradictory hypocrite, Mr. “Silence the Mouth of the People, But Not Mine” Tannebaum. If King Hussein did his job there would be no need for any.

Anti-Christians are very good at punching themselves in the mouth or placing their fist right in front of their face so that slight stumble on a block of truth lands a punch.

Please sign the White House petition to send Piers Morgan to Mars (peace be upon him/pbuh)

Why Trying to Ban Gun Ownership or Ownership of High Capacity Magazines By Citizens Is Wrong and Unhelpful or: Why Piers Morgan’s Reasons for Attacking the 2nd Amendment Is Illogical:

1) The government is not perfect at all, nor the police, so to make out citizens who have “treated him incredibly well” as why to leave, is backwards, hypocritical and oblivious thinking.

2) It is because so many citizens are well armed that the federal government, on a whim can’t easily or can only inefficiently commit a war of tyranny or to try and subjugate all the citizens to conform to its will and desires (non-Christians often try to get people to obey their desires without saying what those desires are or indicating them to someone who is unfamiliar with them, which is nonsensical of non-Christians, for example the “I don’t know you therefore I don’t want to be your friend or help you” paradox: how then does the non-Christian get help when they want it or how did they make their friends?). Piers is also ignoring that governments and police misuse guns and their weapons by using them as a mere threat to enforce bad laws and grope or arrest you over their mere suspicions or hurt pride. So then Piers should be against the ownership of guns by even government, police and soldiers too.

3) Piers, rather than admit he is in error, is choosing to hold on to his pride. This is typical of non-Christians. “Pride comes before a fall.” – God

4) Guns don’t kill people, people kill people, therefore it’s certain type of people who should be “repealed” from owning guns. That is already in place, but Morgan is blaming a mom’s bad decision to leave her guns out (or in the exhaustion of caring for her son herself, perhaps rejecting to use a nanny to help out), which is then throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Imagine if someone made a bow and arrow so strong it could penetrate two deer at once, or go an extremely long distance. And say “a crazy” gets one and uses it to assassinate someone, should then that bow and arrow be banned so that the advantage for hunters who use it is lost, because a small many misused them?

16 Reasons America Is Falling Apart

Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation.
And a house divided against a house falls. …
For from now on, there shall be five in one house divided,
three against two, and two against three.
Luke 11:17, 12:52

And if a house is divided against itself,
that house cannot stand.

Mark 3:25

1) Christianity in America is polluted with New Ageism, Arminianism and Liberalism or antiTrinitarian nonsense (which leads to polytheism nonsense). More than half the Christians have minds heavily polluted with logical fallacies that come from those three isms. Mormonism is polluted with Freemasonry and Occultism. The country is divided between a huge number of different types of Christians therefore, as in with different moral standards and interpretations of basic Bible scriptures. These false Christians also drain America’s money, especially using the tithing heresy, which is that Christians are to give a tenth of their income to their church (or whoever these false Christians make seem is the most worthy to get the tithe). Much of that donated money goes to either more advertising for more tithes or donations of other types, spreading their false version of Christianity and into their personal banks.

Many liberals are anti-science New Agers who drain America’s money by duping people or convincing them that New Age beliefs are right and traditional Christianity (the Reformed/Calvinistic type) is wrong. Because of this there is moral confusion as to right from wrong, and where there is moral confusion there are psychopaths and narcissists who will be raised up and who will multiply endlessly, and often getting into leadership positions (including parental) and in those positions, can do extreme damage, including mass murder.

2) Psychopaths and narcissists are becoming more and more common in America. They are one of the main reasons America is being ruined. A huge number of them are in prisons all over America (and the world) and everyone is being taxed to death because of it.

They are entrenched in many jobs, including leadership positions. Clinton and Obama are narcissists even and yet many Americans love and support them. They should be permanently enslaved and put to hard labor. The ones that committed crimes for sure in adulthood, and who do so for pleasure, should be fed poorly and made to do something useful like de-ice Greenland or mine dangerous mines and the things they mine out sold and the profit given over to orphanages or kids who need money to survive.

Any beautiful ones should be cloned and the clones raised lovingly so that they don’t turn out like their “parent”. Yes, I said cloned. Why? Because a loss of beauty from the human gene pool is a terrible thing. Also, the less genes there are to go around, the more like mass deaths might occur from people who lack immunity to withstand them. Yes, you just read that. Next:

There should be a standardized test given to everyone who applies for employment, to determine whether or not they are a psychopath (psych) or narcissist (narc), and if they fail, should be monitored from outside their property (no snooping unless evidence of a crime is committed) and any friends of family of theirs questioned to determine the personality of that person, and if good evidence comes up that they are a psych or narc, should be imprisoned until any change in their personality shows they are neither. Instead, the p’s and n’s are allowed to roam freely so long as they don’t commit any obvious crime, and so create all kinds of damage or stir up anger, which leads to mental illnesses or trauma and Hellish arguments that lead to crime.

3) America’s legal system accepts a single witness as sufficient to make an ACCUSATION despite no corroboration of the same event as EVIDENCE, a clear violation of common sense and a violation of the principle of the Declaration of Independence’s “right to pursue happiness”. You can’t pursue happiness if GOSSIP is entertained and accepted by law. It’s also hypocritically since “hearsay” is rejected, yet direct one person accusation testimony isn’t, why is one acceptable and the other not?! Nonsense logic.

4) Atheists and anti-Christians have gained a strong propaganda position for decades by having hijacked public schools and their history, literature and science textbooks and have made America in the eyes of hundreds of millions appear to be better off secular and made it appear as if those “founding fathers” including the Pilgrims, who left Britain, did so merely for “freedom of religion” rather than FREEDOM IN CHRIST. And they made it appear as if The Theory of Evolution was based on science, that science is the only way to know the truth, and that science and freedom to say and practice whatever religion or philosophy you want is what makes America great. Doing whatever you want is not what makes anything great, nor can people do whatever they want religiously: you aren’t allowed to murder in the name of some religion. To teach these things causes confusion about history and moral degredation.

5) In the liberal media, atheists and anti-Christians have made it appear as if “going with your heart” is also good, or the best thing to do, but that if you are a conservative and go against liberalism, evolution dogma or big bang dogma, that that’s bad. So multiple contradictions there which causes massive confusion and conflict among Americans, and anyone trying to reason with them.

6) The atheists and anti-Christians have successfully duped hundreds of millions of Americans every 20 years into giving up much of their money for secular education, in public schools, colleges and universities, forcing them to memorize their Darwin-and liberal/libertine-based dogma and to pander to those who are it’s main pushers in order to “get ahead” in life / make more money that the average person, not be poor, and to live comfortably. This causes moral degradation and leads to people caring more about money and pleasure than the truth, truth which leads to eternal peace and truth.

7) Atheists have polluted the Internet with many copycat pages of logical fallacy lists which Google, the most popular search engine, puts at the top of their search results, and of course these atheists have given these logical fallacy lists an anti-theism spin, deceiving millions every year into thinking that theism and religion is illogical, or of not deceiving, reinforcing existing deception. This causes moral degradation and confusion as to what logic is.

8) Bankers, clearly anti-Christian ones, the ones who manage billions of dollars, have used ursury to profit off of the world, and by doing so have helped drive everyone into debt. The Bible forbids ursury, and by not listening to the Bible, they have caused everyone to become desperate for money and comfort rather than allowing them to use their mental energies to focus on what matters more: pleasing God and getting eternal peace. So this too causes moral and economic degredation. Bankers now are known to have come with all kinds of evil schemes to steal money from others, even from other banks.

9) Celebrities, who are living idols, they by their example of lead America into going along with the bankers, atheists, liberals and anti-Christians. Youths, who are ignorant at first, are easily lead astray by those who are beautiful, powerful and who get the most attention. So celebrities have caused moral degredation.

10) Game designers have polluted the world with godless or anti-theistic, violent games, which male youths especially love, so they too have spread moral degredation.

11) The rich of the world have both sat on their money at the hurt of the poor and needy and used it to gain more money, and help the anti-Christians and liberals to continue propspering as a group, so that they can continue to dupe them into thinkng that it’s best to buy from their businesses and the anti-Christians and liberals, who are people who are immoral and arbitrary and wasteful with money.

12) As mentioned in the previous entry, the Federal and state governments of America have been stuffing jails and prisons with anyone and everyone for any reason, and police, especially in certain states, like New Mexico and Nevada, have been abusing their position of authority to retaliate, slander, libel and arrest people for disrespecting them or not pandering to them. This has an obvious destructive effect on the economy and morality as it provokes hostility towards those who are supposed to be upholding the laws of the country, not disregarding them.

13) This 12th reason, which is mentioned in the Bible, at least indirectly, is prostitution. Prostitution, as the Bible says, spreads crime. Just use yoru imagination to figure out why it works at that way, or go read why. Prostituion, for example, leads to higher rates of abortion. Abortion is murder, and the more you murder (if you have a conscience), the more you want to forget you’ve murdered. The usual way for a prostitute to try and forget is alcohol or some hard drug, like meth or crack, and overuse of alcohol and those drugs, which is common, leads to criminal acts and accidentally or in the heat of anger od desperation for more drugs, killing others. It also makes prostitutes vulnerable to rape, and of course prostites are more likely to be raped then not being that they are seen as near worthless except, logically, for sex.

14) The more abortions, the less competitive a nation is against other nations. Though the atheist nations China, Russia and Vietnam have a much higher abortion rates than the USA, so much higher that have a major male to female ration problem (which eventually leads to wars both internally and externally due to frustrated men or women) they make up for it with their superior resources, underground child labor, and greater use of their natural resources (unlike America, which locks up vast amounts of them in national forests like Yellowstone). Those countries also don’t have massive amount of their population imprisoned, and so have a larger work force. That is why, despite America’s large popular and figuratively speaking, limitless natural resources, it is losing against Russia and China. Consider: how many Tesla’s have their been in America’s history, or world history? Is it helping by aborting over 10 million babies a year? It’s a fact that extreme genius is often natural, like the ability to dance or sing well. Even if the abortions leave more resources for already existing geniuses to be able to be as helpful as Tesla, where are they then? Where are the super inventors? Where is even a Henry Ford? Clearly abortion kills not just babies, but the nation the they are killed in. The point, is that without these super innovators to come along ever few decades, that there will be technological stagnation, which helps to increase stress and frustration. With an expanding population, speedier technologies need to be created, otherwise information and help is delayed to the point where there are great losses, including life, and that causes resentment, and eventually the resentment, if not appeased, boils over into fighting, and if the fighting isn’t stopped, it leads to battles, and if the battles are not stopped, it leads to wars, and when war happens, the country is no longer a single country, but two new countries.

15) Physical health problems are everywhere in America. It’s as if they were covered with plagues. It’s a country filled with diseased people, cancer ridden people and very obese people and people who have a greatly reduced ability to work for various reasons, like meth or alcohol addiction, missing limbs, defective brains, or chronic fatigue caused by chronic depression or chemical poisoning from the water, air or prescription drugs with damaging side effects.

16) The Iraq War, aka Operation Iraqi Freedom and Afghanistan War aka Operation Enduring Freedom, besides having resulted in a loss of millions of lives, lives who were attacked without a just cause (not including God’s causes), for example the little Iraqi children who had nothing to do with the Iraq War except for being in Iraq, but have also cost America approximately 6 trillion dollars. The Chinese loan us money, we go into debt, and those who make the weapons of mass destruction, who drill for and supply the oil, and make the vehicles for transport and war, and who provide the drink and food, and the soldiers, they make money, but does it benefit America in general? No it doesn’t, because those profiting from the war are less than five percent of America, even when you include all the American employees of these companies that help the wars to continue. Yes, that less than five percent spends money on restaurants in America, grocery stores, and so on, but those who make the most money sit on it and many of them invest in foreign companies, not American. And they sit on their wealth so that they can take pride in being among the richest. Billions of dollars sit in banks, making bankers wealthy too, who also sit on their money to the hurt of everyone else. Sitting on millions and billions is like sitting on expensive goods and not using them. It doesn’t do anyone any good, not even the one sitting on them. It’s an act of hate, not love, to hoard wealth.

“The love of money is the root of all evil” – The apostle Paul

“A house divided against itself cannot stand” – Yeshua, the only Son of God

“because of lawlessness the love of many will grow cold” – – Yeshua, who is God

Related Articles:

The astonishing story of the last few decades is a massive redistribution of wealth, as the rich have shifted the tax burden

Buy Un-American

Domestic Stock Funds Now More Foreign – SmartMoney

Stock Trading Is Still Falling After ’08 Crisis

After Facebook, More Fear of Stock Market

Zynga plays BLAME GAME with Facebook as stock tanks 40%

Investing in domestic vs. foreign markets in a volatile economy

Jobs First? What Should Be Most Important For a President?

How Overincarceration Hurts Communities and Increases Violent Crime

25 U.S. cities with the highest percentage of children in poverty

Confidence in U.S. Churches Hits All-Time Low, Down To 44%

Prison and Jail Population Reaches 2.2 Million

Categories: The United States of America Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Are Libertines and Liberals the Same?

March 28, 2012 3 comments

(Continued from the previous post):

In order of what seemed to be most relevant (in my opinion):


According to “The New Liberalism” “liberalism was strategically misrepresented libertinism” by unnamed persons, so for all anyone knows this is just a delusion or lie by the writer who himself recognizes a real connection.

According to “The New Revolution: Libertine Liberal vs Classic Liberal”:

There is a difference between “liberal” and “libertine”. We have, in the course of many social revolutions, struggled to define that line with varying degrees of success. “Libertine” behavior has and will always be looked upon askance because the connotation of “libertine” means the breakdown of society and the breakdown of society has not always been for the good of society. “Libertine” is to be free, not only in thought and expression, but from morality and societal norms. “Liberal” is to believe in and support the idealism of freedom of thought and expression, but to lend it support from a moral base.

Therein lies our problem with modern day definition of the term “liberal”. Somewhere around 1967 the term “liberal” became confused with the “libertine” revolution of the counter culture. While the movement began in the grandest of idealism of freedom and equality for minorities, retaining its “liberal” idealism for a time, it quickly slipped its anchorage and drifted resolutely towards the “libertine”.

My thoughts on “Liberal” is to believe in and support the idealism of freedom of thought and expression, but to lend it support from a moral base.” is that it sounds like to me, “Liberalism is libertinism only with the attempt to justify it using morals” which is an obvious contradiction. It seems analogous to me like saying (without the pretentious “idealism” word), “Liberalism is the belief that you should be able to think whatever you feel like without being punished, and studying how to justify this belief using current (Christian?) morals or believing that they are (for what reason?)”. Therefore, liberalism is the belief that you should be able to think (what about “and feel”?) whatever you want to, from abusing and raping, torturing and murdering for fun, to imagine and express with delight abusing kids and the destruction of all moral beings with the justification for doing so with (Christian?) morality. This is obviously a contradictory belief system, just like Hinduism with it’s original practices of widow-burning and ritualistic murder of strangers/travelers yet claiming that it’s about enlightening yourself by avoiding “evil”, and not saying what “evil” is.

Strangely, Wikipedia (which says a libertine is a person without morals) has a hidden key phrase on its libertinism entry: “Classical liberalism”. Being that Wikipedia is controlled by liberals (the head being the liberal and atheist Jimmy/Jimbo Wales (who also apparently has narcissism disorder), it’s obvious to me why they would hide saying that liberalism was based on immorality. Why they would hide the phrase though, is something I don’t understand, though I can imagine a demon was mocking God in a connivingly and malicious way, by possessing someone and getting them to place that hint. I tried to see if the phrase was simply an outdated Google result by looking at Google’s cache, but found nothing. The Classical Liberalism entry also makes no connection. The only page in which the two are mentioned together is the Individualism page (which by the way is worded pretentiously and not something a “lay person” could easily understand).

Side note: To my surprise I found out that John Calvin had interacted with and spoke against “libertines” (1)(2)(3), surprised because that man figures prominently in my life, and just didn’t think it would have anything to do with him.

The sad thing is is that “libertine” would best have been associated with Christianity, especially Catholics who became true Christians after being freed from Roman Catholicism, but “freethinkers” (many of whom seem to be atheists) messed that up, just like they did with the words “free”, “liberal*”, “science” and “skeptic” (1)(2). They also try to do this with logical fallacies (which has to do with philosophy). The only atheist I can think of who made a decent contribution to any of these fields is Bertrand Russel for philosophy and Tesla for electronics and engineering. Mark Twain contributed to humor.

*The link to the word liberal (above) links to a blog on the ancient meaning of the word liberal and uses a certain word for a certain male private part that some may consider offensive.

Related Info:
Christianity and Libertarianism: Do they belong together?


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 58 other followers