Posts Tagged ‘knight’

A Prediction – What May Happen After WW3

September 21, 2012 Leave a comment

If Israel fires a nuke over Iran, and specifically targets them for an EMP attack (rather than directly killing anyone and being seen as mass murderers for at least years). And suppose they do so to Saudi Arabian and Jordan just to be on the safe side, and protect themselves from revenge attacks, this would surely start WW3 as it would be seen as a major economic attack affecting all countries’ economies negatively, including the US. This then would trigger at least other EMP attacks throughout the world and nations that wouldn’t be affected much by it due to being poor, would probably face major food and ammunition shortages due to the shortage on oil (due to the electronics needed to distribute the oil worldwide in mass, being destroyed) needed for transportation of those things. And that in turn would cause the poor for sure, to start trying to steal from their neighbors for a while. That in turn would eventually lead to inter-town and city battles, perhaps even state and country battles over food and ammo and other resources to help the survivors live comfortable lives during such a horrible time. And if things get really bad because of such worldwide conflicts, food would become even scarcer. That would be due to farmers fleeing in fear for their lives when their farms or ranches are raided by everyone and their seeds perhaps even taken. Afterwards, people might start resorting to murder for food (cannibalism I mean) everywhere, after having first eaten their pets if any, hopefully, before resorting to such a horrible thing.

There would be some countries with a large amount of intact electronics though I think, mainly in Africa and South America. I believe that after or during the cannibalism stage, or just when it started, a clever man, a psychopathic narcissist would appear to take advantage of everyone’s desperation, the anti-Christ. Most likely seeing what is happening now, he’s already plotting as to how to take advantage of the world, moving his chess pieces into place, securing other partners in crime (and even planning on taking advantage of them too and backstabbing them in his justified paranoia).

I imagine he’s at leat a multi-millionaire, if not billionaire, or perhaps the spoiled son of one, and has stored away an enormous amount of fuel, food, weapons, military gear, horses and electronics to use for a world wide presidential campaign so to speak, with a well armed secret service. I imagine he’s secured friends, through bribery, promises of power and/or sexual favors of some sort, in countries not likely to be struck by EMP weapons, friends who will come to help him during his run for emperor of the world. After dispatching messengers throughout all the major cities, and acquiring followers for himself, through food handouts more lies, he’ll then have his followers resort to pillaging anyone who won’t follow him, and murdering them for food for others, as in more cannibalism. The envoys will use scare tactics, and a clever and conniving way to pressure everyone else to fall in line: take our masters mark on your forehead or hand where everyone can see it, or you won’t get our help, and no one will be able to buy or sell from those getting our help.

The millions of true Christians of course will realize what is going on, and will reject these envoys of doom, realizing they are the anti-Christ’s henchman though not yet knowing what this anti-Christ looks like. When the envoys realize the Christians are a “problem”, they will become hostile towards them and use them as a scapegoat and punching bag of convenience for the problems everyone is facing and an “easy” (so they think) source of plunder. like the Jews were in Hitler’s time and onward to today.

Some of these Christians will probably become farm and sex slaves and food fodder for the world. the Jews of of Hitler’s time. Even now most of the world scapegoats the Christians. Too bad they don’t do so with Christ and be saved (Christians who know the Bible well enough to know the Biblical term “scapegoat” know what I mean by that).

The prophecy Jesus made about the world being worse than it was then (just) before the Flood of Noah already came true, the world has gotten worse, mainly, because God’s word is available to all, and clear enough in various pages (and even if not, there are plenty of Christians and informational sources that most people can get access to through someone who has a car and computer) that anyone can find out it is his word. There are libraries everywhere. A Muslim could even trick one of his leaders by saying, “Bring me a Bible so I can show everyone how false it is” or secretly got o some Christian community for one, if he wants to check for himself if it could possibly be God’s word. The Quran itself says the Bible is God’s word, yet many Muslims won’t even listen to that, their own “holy book” from the man Mohammed they worship and whom some will murder over in their passion for him and pride. Instead they make up some easy excuse without evidence, like, “The Bible’s been tampered with so now we can’t believe it” or “Our God did away with it, said it was not as good as the Quran.” And though knowing God’s word is here on Earth, and having a good example of the Baptists and Presbyterians (the non-liberal ones) for them to follow, Christians all over the world, and though not being rich being charitable even to Muslims and other enemies of Christ, the world still refuses to heed Christ, even though knowing his greatest law: “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” So jealous are they as were the ancient Greek philosophers of Moses, that they will only refer to Christ now and then, as a good man or spiritual master, but more rare will they mention the good things he said and did. And when they do, they use them as tickets for a continued life of sin, a passport for evil. They’ll take him out of context and say, “Don’t judge.” (there should be no period after that, despite the translators of the Bible putting one there) or the other famous line, “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” And though people who say that are enemies of Christ, of the true Christians, they won’t even repeat, “Love your enemies” or “forgive your enemies” or “bless those who curse you”, because such words cut them to the heart too much, and are much harder to conceal of the meaning of. “Judge” is confused by Christian haters as meaning, “condemn” or “say we’re wrong”, though Jesus by “judge” in the “Don’t judge” passage, meant “make a moral determination about whether someone is doing right or not” (he also separated that from “condemn” mentioning that right after). So, there is a layer of confusion to figuring out what it means to judge. Those who repeat it don’t necessarily know they are saying something in a vague way or confusing way that often delays them being easily or quickly judged again, it’s due to their own confusion of the word. If they knew what Jesus meant, then they’d realize they were being hypocritical being that they are doing the very same thing by merely saying, “Don’t judge” to anyone. However, if they were to say, “You should just forgive and love your enemies like Jesus said to”, what confusion over that would there be? They’d realize in their hateful response (even though saying a good thing like that) that they are not forgiving and loving the Christian who judged them for whatever, the Christian they consider an enemy. They think they are okay as long as they say, “Don’t judge” because perhaps it is true, they don’t say, “Oh you Christians are wrong” (though hypocritically often many liberals will say fundamentalist Christians are conservatives and will say or imply that they steal, murder by war or poisoning the environment, and covet (are jealous of what they have). I think also they don’t use that line because they are simply very ignorant of the Bible, have forgotten what it teaches if they ever learned that part, and don’t want to remember and deliberately forget. So the most they do in response to a Christian word-wise when trying to use the Bible directly against them is, “Don’t judge.” Other common responses are: “Hypocrite,” “You’re ranting,” “You shouldn’t condemn,” “troll,” “go away,” “you’re crazy,” “you’re stupid,” “you’re obsessed,” “you’re a fanatic,” “you’re ignorant,” “God forbid someone else have an opinion (which is a conniving weasel tactic meant no one can have factual things to say except that Christianity is false and Christians are bad), “I have my way you have yours,” and absurd, arrogant, hypocritical and common, “Don’t shove your religion down my throat.” All of which are usually ended by a period, because they are mere insults and cheap shots meant to shield their minds from guilt or fear of God. Those insults also all apply to them.

My suggestion, learn wilderness survival skills, and buy some tent or tents and survival equipment and most important of all, learn how to get saved. If you want live forever, read this

Mat 7:15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.
Mat 7:16 You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?
Mat 7:17 So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit.
Mat 7:18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.
Mat 7:21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’
Mat 7:23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’
Mat 7:24 “Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock.
Mat 7:25 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock.
Mat 7:26 And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand.
Mat 7:27 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.”
Mat 7:28 And when Jesus finished these sayings, the crowds were astonished at his teaching,
Mat 7:29 for he was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.

Atheist Evolutionists of National Geographic “Solved Mystery” Everyone!

September 7, 2010 Leave a comment

The Yeti crab is blind, yet still manages to see better than atheists with eyes that can see.

Check it out everyone, the atheist evolutionists of National Geographic have committed high blasphemy against Father Darwin by not mentioning evolution in one of their articles!:

Mystery Solved … Crab Swarm

A new study solves a longstanding mystery surrounding the crabs: how the the normally sedentary species has the stamina to “undergo one of the most arduous migrations on Earth,” in the words of study co-author Lucy Turner.

When the wet season blows into Christmas Island (map) each year, millions of Christmas Island red crabs hike for several days, from a high rain forest plateau down to Indian Ocean beaches, where the crabs mate in burrows.

“It’s an amazing feat—going from not being able to exercise for more than ten minutes to walking for several miles,” said Turner, a biologist at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom.

But by sampling circulatory fluid—the equivalent of blood—from migrating crabs, Turner and colleagues discovered that a surge in the crustacean hyperglycemic hormone works with glucose, an energy-producing sugar, to fuel the epic trek.

(See “World’s Longest Migration Found—Two Times Longer Than Thought.”)

The crab’s endocrine system also stockpiles enough sugar to allow the crabs to return to their forest homes, Turner added.

Study published in the September issue of the Journal of Experimental Biology.

—Christine Dell’Amore

Published September 3, 2010

(Just forget how the crab’s evolved to have such a system everyone and focus on how National Geographic posted a sciency “discovery”. Don’t ask questions, no further explanations needed; evolutionists are the bestiest, rightiest, “no Gods no guilt” non-group group of people with no beliefs, I mean who have different beliefs (and no similar ones, but “atheists are perfect.” Just look, they even posted a story on the danger of BPA SEVEN DAYS AGO! THEY ARE REALLY LEADING THE WAY ON HEALTH WARNINGS NOW! WOOOOOOIE! (This health campaign by Christians and others from May 12, 1999 to eliminate BPA doesn’t really count, it’s nooooot reeeeeeeeeeal peeeeeeoople, nothing to see here.) And they are letting tons of people comment too can’t you see?! Oh wait, they still have none, might be because everytime I try they give me the friendly message: “You are not allowed to comment.” Only atheists may speak their deep thoughts, like, “be honest you damn theists! Stop being hypocrites! I love to get drunk and act stupid with my sisters and try to deconvert them to atheism.” Atheists are so profound and scientific.)

Related Post:


See also: for more information on fundamentally ill atheists.

”23 Minutes In Hell” and Liar, George Noory’s Confused ”state of mind”

July 13, 2010 3 comments

Last night, George Noory had on a guest, Bill Wiese, obviously a Christian, who gave his account of being in Hell. At first George said it was a near death experience, but he was later corrected. Odd that being that he had his own OBE (out of body experience) that he’d mess up the details, especially on a rare incident like seeing Hell. You could say it was disrespectful on George’s part. Anyways, George, who prides himself on keeping his opinion out of the stories he gets, wrecked this story by, guess, injecting his opinion to try and refute this Christian, who was obviously the fundamentalist type, but the good kind, not the “be good by obeying God and not rejecting your forgiveness to get to Heaven” type (also known as Arminians). Unfortunately, sadly, Bill was being cowardly or weak when George rudely tried to refute him: George gave his usual Universalist Christian cliche, “I know a lot of people who don’t believe in God, I have on psychics who don’t do anything wrong, they don’t murder anyone. I think Hell is just a state of mind” reply which he gives when he hears, “If you don’t believe in God you’re going to Hell.” When George, or anyone says that, he’s saying it without evidence, and playing God over right and wrong. In list form, this is what he is doing wrong when he says such a thing:

1) He’s contradicting the commandments, which Jesus also repeated as valid, as did every Christian in the Bible. No one said (as sick Christians do), “Oh that’s legalistic to try and obey God to the letter” or “perfectly”. None said, “Just believe what you want” or “your religion is personal” or “God won’t punish reasonable people” or “right and wrong is whatever George Noory or I say it is.” For George to say that a person is “good”, besides being absurd, since there are hardly even any good true Christians, is also absurd because he’s pretending, obviously pretending, to know the hearts and to have seen the lifetime of deeds of the guests he has on. Can he really know what is going on in over a thousand peoples’ lives, even enough to say they’ve never murdered anyone? So he’s been watching them every hour of their life? That’s like a 16-year-old on facebook or myspace or bebo with over 200 friends, pretending that every single one of them is a close friend, and that they know them. I don’t think so. At best you can really “know” about twenty people after having worked with them for a few years, and a typical 16-year-old American or British person would know at best about 41 people from having been around them often. The Bible clearly states that it is wrong to deny God’s existence and that people who refuse to love him will not be forever tolerated in any place other than Hell. It clearly causes a disturbance of the peace, at the very least God’s, and disgusts every Christian, as in real Christ-followers, to see rebellion. A Christian may not make it apparent right away that you’re disturbing them by acting impure, and they might even find it funny for a a while, but after, it disgusts them. God wants, in the end, the majority of rebellious people be sent away, to disturb only other rebels, and get what they deserve for their hostility.

2) George is contradicting his claim that he doesn’t give his opinion, which he says he doesn’t do because the audience doesn’t want to hear him, but what the guests have to contribute. But he is a hypocrite obviously, a false Catholic (or an example of a typical Catholic, hypocritical), because when he hears the truth about God preached, his evil heart kicks back in it’s taking offense at being called “evil” or “not good”. He’s obviously bigoted, as are all who hate Christians.

3) George is contradicting his teaching that right and wrong is just whatever you believe it to be (even going so far as to teach that Hell is just a state of mind), and might as well be teaching that reality is whatever you want it to be. It’s a contradiction, because when then isn’t what a fundamentalist Christian believes to be just as real? It also shows hypocrisy and bigotry to imply that only Christians and murderers can’t affect anything with their beliefs.

4) It’s also a contradiction for George to imply or say that murderers and Christians can’t affect anything with their beliefs, since his hostile attitude towards them clearly implies that he does believe that what they believe can affect reality. It affects reality in this way: what people believe determines their behavior, including their speech, and many people know this, and so try and change the education people get in school, what they see and hear on the “news”, in movies, what they read in books, even going so far as to make corrupt translations of the Bible to fool people into believing things like that Peter was “the rock” or making it hard to determine if Jesus was not God (something Catholics have done with many translations).

5) By itself, it makes no point to say that “Hell is a state of mind.” If George’s point was simply that Hell was a state of mind, then how does that change that people will be in extreme torment? It’s just as pointless as saying, “I think Heaven is a state of mind.”

6) There is no evidence that Hell is a state of mind.

7) It makes no sense to say that Hell is a state of mind, because Hell is described the Bible as a place, just as it describes Heaven as a place and other locations, and besides that, there is indirect evidence that it does exist from the testimony of Christians and non-Christians whose soul or spirit has left their body. It’s just as much a place as is the bottom of the deepest part of the ocean, which though is rarely seen from eyes behind plastic or glass or from a few feet away, can be seen indirectly in other ways. A person would be thought of as fool to say that the bottom of the deepest part of the ocean is a state of mind, or that the farthest place in the universe from Earth is a state of mind, or that the center of the Earth is a state of mind or that the freezing Arctic is a state of mind.

8) Illogical bias: Does George also believe that Heaven and angels are also a state of mind? If not, why? Clearly he’s biased since rarely if ever does a person say that Heaven is a state of mind, except perhaps people of a certain religion, like Buddhism maybe. For a part Christian like George to dismiss Hell, but not Heaven, makes his bias obvious. He’s effectively saying, “I like this part of the Bible, but I personally hate this part, so don’t believe it.” Why would Heaven be real but not Hell?

9) Hypocrisy: George has, with bitterness in his voice, stated that he would not forgive someone who murdered a family member. He said this after a guest caller made a silly rant about how he had been taught from some spiritual beings or being, that his murdered family member wanted to be murdered (and so everything was okay) and so he forgave the murderer when he found himself next to him. If George isn’t willing to forgive murderers, why should God? Why shouldn’t God send them to Hell forever if George doesn’t believe they shouldn’t be forgiven? Further, the world figuratively speaking, murdered Jesus, and that was God’s family member, as were, indirectly, the millions of Christians who were killed for being Christ-followers. If God were to not forgive those who murdered or who greatly contributed to those murderers, then more than the number of those who killed Jesus and millions of Christians would be permanently unforgiven, and that may be, but the point is, then why would George feel repelled by the thought of many millions of murderers being in Hell?

10) Another contradiction, in a way, is that if George meant by, “Hell is just a sate of mind and therefore just change your outlook on life” is denying that murderers should be punished, because God wouldn’t send anyone to a prison, which is basically, is what Hell is. Basically, Hell i, “a prison below ground without light and in which you are continually in pain.”

11) Encouraging crime: if George was implying the disgusting cliche which is that, “Life is what you make of it” in other words, “Just change how you view things”, he’s teaching (just as other guests on Coast to Coast have, especially, big surprise, “psychics”), that harming people can be a good thing, or neither right or wrong, if that’s how you want to view it, and that painful punishment for harming someone, can simply be viewed as peaceful and pleasurable and a reward for harming people. And that’s also a contradiction of George’s teaching or encouraging people to hate murderers then.

12) George’s attempt to make it seem like God isn’t harsh/hard/strict/wouldn’t forgive by trying to do away with sending the criminals to prison, and just making it a “state of mind” reminds me of the dumb Arminian line that God didn’t design Hell for humans, but for Satan and demons (for example a Pastor Galen (father of the wifeless Pastor Dustin Galen said that), which is bigoted, because it’s making out humans to be inherently better than angels, like saying, “God didn’t make Hell for whites, but for black people”, on top of that it’s not Biblical in that the Bible teaches that angels are greater than humans, sinless in fact, and the Bible teaches that God predestined all things, including what we choose to do (using direct and indirect acts) and nothing in the Bible says Hell was only intended for sinful angels. On top of that, God clearly is going to send billions of humans to Hell, so what difference does it make if it were designed only for demons? And concerning destiny, why would it be good for God to control the wills of demons, but not humans? George seems to be trying to make it so that God doesn’t seem so bad by believing that he wouldn’t actually send criminals to a prison forever, but would only trick them into thinking that they were in Hell. Why would God simply use a mind-trick or senses-trick? So he’s going to have billions of people scattered about screaming in agony bursting with tears writhing in pain screaming blasphemies while they are in the renewed glorified universe of peace? And where would they be? Would they be scattered here and there among the peaceful and good people who are trying to enjoy the renewed universe and Heaven, or all in a big pile right next to God’s throne? Talk about dumb. There’s no point in keeping them around and it’s not just and makes God out to be a liar, being that he promised justice and perfect eternal peace for those who love him, not eternal torment by listening and seeing or feeling up against them those in eternal torment.

13) Another contradiction is that if reality is just a state of mind, as George implied by his Hell statement and his teaching or implying that reality can be affected by intent, is that murder doesn’t have to be considered murder, but like his ranting guest caller who said that his family member wanted to be murdered, a murderer can simply be a person doing a good deed or helping out by fulfilling a request, among other things, including just being an angel in disguise giving the gift of a peaceful death, even if it was by torturing a person to death.

This “reality is whatever I believe it to be and whatever everyone but fundamentalist Christians or Calvinist Christians want it to be” is clearly a hypocritical and nonsensical teaching. Not surprising to me, on the same show, George had on the narcissist (that includes elitist) scientist David Sereda, who was encouraging everyone to intend the oil spill to go away, and talked about supposed evidence from some prestigious university from some prestigious top physicist that your intentions and “karma” could, he implied, affect in a “positive” way, whatever you wanted to be fixed. He didn’t say positive, but that is what he implied. I point that out because he didn’t give any evidence that you could harm something or make water impure by intending it and doing a “good deed”. His mentioning of karma and “meditating” (on intending things to change, like for the oil spill to go away) by the way, is further of evidence of my belief that he is a Buddhist, though I’ve never heard him say or write that he was. And now that I write that, that’s just more evidence that Buddhists are also confused as to what is real or not (and big surprise since they, or many of them at least, believe that nothing exists, and is just an “illusion”). And now that I write about that, doesn’t that sound like what George was teaching: that reality is just an illusion? The illusion, for many millions, if not billions, sadly, is that George and his fellow host Ian Punnet, and their many psychopathic guests, are good teachers of the truth.

7-15-2010: Yesterday night George was asked if he was religious, or someone said, “I don’t know if you’re religious” and George gave this cliche response, “I’m spiritual”, which besides showing him to be a false Catholic, or not one at all, and just a supporter, shows his ignorance of what “spiritual” means. It simply means, “Having to do with that which is spiritual” WHICH IS TRUE FOR EVERYONE, since everyone processes and outputs information, which is a spiritual thing (you can’t see information itself, it can only be represented, though God may be able to see it directly somehow and allow others to).

7-18-2010: On the absurd Time Travelers show George Noory hosted, I think yesterday night, George lied and misquoted Wiese, asking this rambling deluded guest who never stops talking, Dr. Bruce Goldberg, if (George didn’t say his name, or rather forgot) a guest he had on who had seen Hell, was right to say that (with a sarcastic voice) “if you believe in very religious things, you’re going to Hell” which isn’t what Bill said, and shows more how childish Noory is. What is the difference between a religious and very religious thing? Weird. Was it not sufficient to say “religious things” or “trus in God” or “trust in Christ”? Apparently the names “Jesus” and “Christ” are terrible words to Noory, like rays of sunlight to a vampire. Bill Wiese basically said that Christ must be accepted as God’s (only direct) son and that you must accept him as your saviour (from your sins, as in you must ask God to forgive you for them and trust Jesus suffered the punishment you deserved for them: the shedding of his blood, hanging on a tree, and physical death, and suffering an eternity of pain for all your sins, not just some or certain ones, in a prison called “Hell”). What does that have to do with “things that very much have to do with a system of worship”? (which is what Noory said by “very religious things”). Dr. Goldberg gave a disgusting cliche response, which was something about how scare tactics like that are used when their power is threatened. WHAT POWER? Calvinists have great control over the world? I wish. And like Noory and Goldberg have no power or money interest, no customers? On top of that Goldberg is a hypnotist, taking advantage over weak-willed people and who commands people what to do without them resisting him. What hypocrite he is, taking the Bible out of context to make it appear to be a mere threat, and making an arbitrary attack like that. God’s power is not threatened by ranting morons who believe that time travelers exist and are whoever they feel them to be, and who say that they know what dogs see when they die and believe any fanciful story as long as it doesn’t threaten their beliefs. According to Dr. Bruce Goldberg then, every threat of punishment is about a fear of loss of control or power, it’s never about keeping peace or trying to give or restore peace in any way, and there should be no threat punishment to the breaking of any law nor a fear of being punished for breaking any laws, including abusing children, robbing the poor and needy, discriminating against strangers and murdering the innocent; did you expect the opposite belief from a “doctor” who believes that it’s okay to control the will of another person and to take advantage of them for fun and profit?

A few minutes later yet another caller praised George for not being confrontational to his guests. He sure is s sarcastic lying, conniving, jerk towards those who threaten the control (as in influence they have over others) and income that he and his “Psychic Hotline to Heaven” friends have. Hypocrites.

Hell is no more in the mind than Heaven. If Hell is in the mind, why not Heaven? If only painful things are in the mind, why not pleasurable? To those Satan isn’t blinding, it is obvious that there is no more reason to believe that Hell or Antarctica are “states of mind” or that “we make Hell here on Earth” anymore than Heaven is a state of mind and something we make on Earth. Those are stupid atheist and New Age cliches meant to express a denial of Biblical facts/that the Bible is God’s word, or that the Bible makes literal statements about a place called Hell and what it will be like in Hell, after God sets it on fire.

A World Full of Hypocrites

Beware of those who say, “Do not judge.”
yet who could care less about the Bible and
hypocritically say, “Do not judge.” whenever
it is convenient for them to dismiss criticism
of their wrongs. Beware of those who say that
all humans are equal (a favorite excuse of
Catholics to excuse themselves of punishment):

Beware of homosexuals, who admit to being liars:

The “10% of adults are gay” myth

A gay celebrity says all gays are liars

Beware of the hypocrisy and insanity of
psychopaths and narcissists, who obsess
on mere appearance, beauty and first
impressions, who favor the charming,
judge books by their covers, ignore
the poor and favor the wealthy:

Beware of those using and prescribing
drugs over right behavior and logic,
repenting and seeking God’s wisdom:
Beware of the hypocrisy of atheists:

Beware of vain bigots, who idolize men
and show contempt for their Maker, and
show contempt for those who exalt Him
above their idols:

Beware of the hypocrisy of Judaics,
who pretend be wise and loving,
who want the money of foreigners,
yet use it oppress the foreigners in
Israel and Christians:

Beware of the hypocrisy of Catholics:

Beware of those who think that they control
their destiny and not God:

Beware of the hypocrisy of false Christians:

Beware of the hypocrisy of those who act like experts,
but show no expertise, beware of deists:


Beware of the hypocrisy of those who say you
must be baptised to be forgiven of your sins:
Beware of Muslims who claim they are good yet who all use
false arguments against why the Bible is inferior or not true.

Beware of Muslims, who claim to have the truth about the
Bible, but are unwilling to tell you what it is, and instead
tell you to go to some other Muslims for answers.

Beware of Muslims who resort to violence, because the
Qur’an commands them to be randomly violent to non-Muslims.

Beware of the Muslims, who only love their children based on the
condition that their children make Mohammed’s word equal to God’s:

Beware of those who believe in karma, because karma justifies
any crime, including crimes against children:

What Buddhists forget, when babbling about Buddha
(his correct sayings):
Believe nothing on the faith of traditions,
even though they have been held in honor
for many generations and in diverse places.
Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it.
Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past.
Do not believe what you yourself have imagined,
persuading yourself that a god inspires you.
Believe nothing on the sole authority of you

[earthly] masters and priests.
After examination, believe what you yourself have tested
and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.

Buddhist Extremists in Bangladesh Beat, Take Christians Captive

Sri Lanka bans American rapper Akon for ‘defaming Buddhism’

The Dalai Lama incites violence against theist Buddhists:

The extreme oppression of the Tibetans under the Lamas: The Story of Tibet’s Serfs

Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth

Beware of Buddhists, who lied about
not being superstitious, and who used
Uniformatarianism, Darwinism, and
Psychoanalysis, and other false
sciences, to obtain more power:

Beware of numerology and astrology,
which are false sciences:

Beware of Wiccans,
who claim to to respect
their law, “Do no harm”,
but neglect the harm
that can be inflicted
with words and neglect.:

Beware of neo pagans who claim
to be at one with “nature”, and
to worship “nature”, and to be it’s
protectors, yet neglect man, which is
apart of it.

Beware of the hypocrisy of worshipers of the
false god Random, also known as “Chaos”
(which is really Satan):

“Stop judging by mere appearances
and make a right judgment.”
Yeshua, the King of Heaven