Archive

Posts Tagged ‘junk science’

The Boyd Bushman Hoax and Appeal to Authority Fallacy

July 11, 2012 3 comments

Boyd Bushman being interviewed by the mathematician, UFO investigator, theoretical physcist and New Ager, David Sereda

An image of one of Boyd supposedly demonstrating anti-gravity


David Sereda, idiot New Ager genius

I saw this comment on YouTube, which was in reply to someone who said that a former employee, a scientific researcher and inventor, in other words a research and development worker, named Boyd Bushman, was a fraud. Whether he really was an employee of Lockheed I don’t know, but he does have at least one patent. But so, in reply to the one calling him a fraud, someone made an illogical comment and perpetuated/parroted a common logical fallacy used by Big Bangers and Evolutionists/Mainstream Science cultists/anti-fundamentalist Christians (fundamentalists are also known as Reformed Christians aka Calvinists and wrongly as conservative Christians who are usually Catholics, Episcopalians, Methodists, and Free Will (Arminian) Christians, though some Reformed Christians do call themselves conservatives, which I think is confusing):


“Don’t you love all the experts on youtube who think they are smarter than a senior scientist from lockheed martin.. Yea, all the while they are working at mcdonalds, yet when they are on the internet they suddenly become expert physicists, describing how experts from Lockheed are wrong and are frauds.. Google patents – Boyd Bushman

My reply:

Just because someone works for Lockheed or performed odd experiments doesn’t mean they know what they are talking about or won’t do deceptive things, AT ALL. A good example is mainstream scientists: they spread bad theories like the big bang and evolution, and stars-from-gas using the good base of the scientific method, why?: money and fame, and many of them have narcissism disorder (narcissists tend to be at the front of the face of everything in the world, including governments. That is because of their ill desire for large amounts of attention and praise).

Boyd even, in one video deliberately talks very vague in a childish and unhelpful way, childish in that he’s not saying anything specific but what it is common for any seasoned scientist like David Sereda who interviewed him, rather, Boyd said “watch nature”. Well what scientist DOESN’T OBSERVE NATURE?! Hello: NEWTON, EINSTEIN, GALILEO and on and on, and biologists regularly attempt to copy God’s work, looking for new industrial or medical chemicals in plants and animals.

Leedskalnin, was he a scientist? Do you know who he is? He was the “McDonalds cashier” scientist as a narcissistic scientist  might say, but despite being a “nobody” lacking college degrees still made an enormous monument using what seemed to be by a combination of antigravity and the use of a traditional weights, levers and pulley moving method. To use the McDonalds cashier insult is a bad stereotype, since genius and truth spring as much from idiots and the lowly as much as the wealthy and elite-schooled; it’s a very wrong stereotype.

Another reason it’s not wise to make fun of McDonald’s employees, is because, supposing for all you know you’re making fun of someone who only has a part time job is an employee there and yet has expertise in some field of physics or some other science field, like logic, theology, maths or physics (and does it take a great imagination to consider that many McDonald’s cashiers are college or university students in some science class, including physics?) and may even be a paid teacher of any of those, maybe even a theoretical physics teacher, which is are types people like yourself usually exalt above as superior persons. And in this so called “bad world economy” it’s very likely that many people of prestige have some second lowly job, especially being that theoretical science isn’t an easy job to profit from. If you hadn’t noticed Michio does a lot of interviews, do you think he does them all for free? Someone of prestige with many high degrees could have some second lowly job just to get rid of the last few payments they own on a loan or to get a loan, or make the final payments on whatever or to help care for a new baby or adopted son or daughter they have to live comfortably.

Back to Leedskalnin: you could reasonably think of him as a type of Boyd Bushman, because tho he was able to pull off amazing things, he didn’t say anything useful enough to be able to duplicate his feats, instead he gave a theory which was so vague (like Boyd) it amounted to vain showing off. That is the case with Boyd. Boyd, Leedskalnin, Maurice Ward (supposed inventor of Starlite) and Hutchison are, in comparison to the inventor Morgado, the inventor of the MYT Engine and Tesla useless people, and shameful even.

Rather than mocking McDonald’s cashiers as being stupid and unreliable for scientific truth and as none being people with any expertise in science, it’s Mainstream Scientists, including any atheist, humanist, pagan, Armininan, New Age, Hindu, Buddhist or Muslim ones, who should be mocked, who should be called “kooks” or “crackpots”. But you shouldn’t say that to just anyone’s face, because you wouldn’t want to unnecessarily insult someone or provoke a violent person to harm you or someone else. They should be called those things if they teach their bad beliefs or endorse them by name, like saying, “Yes being a Muslim is good” or “There’s nothing wrong with being a pagan” or “Fundamentalism is bad (fundamentalism is just belief in basic teachings of the Bible necessary for being a good Christian).” I’m not saying that just because someone is a kook or crackpot or stupid that they can’t come up with anything useful or don’t do anything useful or that nothing useful can be learned from accidental discoveries they make, just that any severely bad teachings they have or believe would make them those things, as opposed to simply having some lowly job at McDonald’s and/or not having any degrees or prestigious awards or prestigious scientists agreeing with you or some popular people.

Also, to attack someone as having illegitimate critique skill or judgment merely because they work at McDonald’s, or as cashier or some other “lowly” job there is called an “Ad Hominem Fallacy”, which is when you personally insult someone for something they do that is far from directly related to what they arguing about, merely talking about or endorsing.

Related Articles:

Autodidactic Hall of Fame – Self-educated People Who’ve Made a Difference

6 Uneducated Amateurs Whose Genius Changed the WorldRead more: 6 Uneducated Amateurs Whose Genius Changed the World (Cracked.com)

1 Cor 1:25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
1 Cor 1:26 For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth.
1 Cor 1:27 But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong;
1 Cor 1:28 God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are,
1 Cor 1:29 so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. – ESV

Psalm 8:2: From out of the mouths of infants and sucklings you have established strength on account of your adversaries, to cause the silence of the enemy and vengeful foe.

Matthew 11:25: “Jesus said, ‘I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from wise and intelligent people and have revealed them to infants.'”

John 7:24: “Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.”

UPDATE: Recently Boyd Bushman was shown in a video as having “disclosed” that aliens and their ships were here on Earth at Area 51 and “24 hours a day working on UFOs”. In one picture he showed what was to me an obviously fake alien, and used poorly made photographs to use as his evidence. The cameraman interviewing him seemed to be doing a deliberately poor job interviewing him and even keeping the camera in focus or used a deliberately poor camera. One commenter on Youtube.com showed an obscenely titled link to a model statuette of the same fake-looking alien Boyd had shown in one of his crappy pictures. Even though that was pointed out in the comments, the one doing so did not get any votes up as far as I could see, rather those praising Boyd and/or while criticizing his and the camera man’s method of presentation were the ones getting votes up. Why is Youtube filled with such gullible idiots? I wonder if the Internet naturally attracts narcissists and those who are gullible and wanting attention, and those who are not gullible and attention-craving abstain from wasting their time voting, in general, to their hurt in many cases. I say that because votes and comments can persuade others to be stupid and evil or wise in a morally good way.

Boyd Bushman Fake Alien (Doll) Hoax Picture Boyd Bushman Fake Alien (Doll) Hoax Picture Comparison
Obviously a doll, and in the second comparison picture it’s obvious the “teeth and smile” are jpeg noise from picture compression. Being that the keywords on the tinypic.com were the same obscene ones as the page of the full picture of the doll it’s obvious this is from the hoaxer, having a laugh at everyone.

By the way, if anyone does want to invest their time or money in a real anti-gravity saucer project, one you can see being made in real time, consider funding my project at http://gofundme.com/deception, which some asshole/s on Craigslist keep flagging away. If you have any mechanical engineering skills and knowledge of physics and would like to apply for a job helping to build this craft attraction go ahead and email me.

Categories: Logic Fallacies Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Two Mainstream Science Geniuses Call Skeptic Mainstreamers “Brainwashed”

November 3, 2011 Leave a comment

The Mind, Physics and a “Breakthrough” Theory of Everything

On the radio show Coast to Coast AM, on the second half of the show today (not the upcoming one today), were two Mainstream Science guests and scientific geniuses. George Noory was the host who interviewed them. Here are the biographies of these two scientists:

Bio on Dr Vernon Neppe

Vernon M . Neppe MD, PhD(Med), FRSSAf, FFPsych(SA), FRCPC, MMed (Psych), DipABPN (Psychiatry; Geriatric Psychiatry; Forensic Psychiatry), DABFM, DABFE, DABPS (Psychopharmacology), FACFE, LMACFE, MB, BCh, DPsM , BA is Director of the Pacific Neuropsychiatric Institute in Seattle, WA, Adjunct Professor of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO and formerly Director, Division of Neuropsychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Dr Neppe has contributed internationally in the specialties of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Neurology, Psychopharmacology, Forensic Psychiatry, Anomalistic Psychology and Epileptology. He also is an author, professional speaker, playwright and philosopher. His books on brain medications include Cry the Beloved Mind: A Voyage of Hope and Innovative Psychopharmacotherapy as well as The Psychology of Déjà Vu.

His listings include editions of Americas Top Doctors, Whose Who in the World, Best Doctors in America, Two Thousand Notable American Men, Five Thousand Personalities of the World, Five Hundred Leaders of Influence, Great Minds of the 21 st Century and Americas Top Psychiatrists. He was an International Man of the Year, received a Millennium Medal of Honor, and has recently been honored for his scientific contributions by being possibly the first USA based physician to be elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of South Africa. He has written more than two hundred publications, and lectured in a dozen countries on four continents and at about 90% of the medical schools in the USA. He was educated in South Africa where he obtained both his primary Medical and PhD degrees, and at Cornell University.

Dr Vernon Neppe founded the PNI in Seattle, WA in late 1992. Dr Neppe also does extensive forensic consultations, and records review but does not do criminal medicolegal work.

Bio on Dr. Edward R. Close PhD, PE

Dr. Close studied physics, math, philosophy, and creative writing at Central Methodist College, receiving his Bachelor of Arts degree in Math and Physics in 1963. He spent one year in the graduate physics program at the University of Missouri at Rolla and one year in the environmental engineering PhD program at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. Additional studies were completed at UCLA, UC Davis, Case Western Reserve and elsewhere. He completed his thesis and received his PhD in environmental science and engineering in 1988.

The focus of Dr. Close’s work is the integration of science and consciousness studies. As a physicist, his areas of research are relativity and quantum mechanics. Since 1959, his exploration of the physical sciences has been enhanced by the intensive practice of consciousness expansion techniques. A member of several professional organizations, MENSA, the International Society for Philosophical Enquiry (ISPE) and Self-Realization Fellowship (SRF), he has traveled extensively and taught mathematics, physics, and meditation techniques. He has recently accepted the position of Science Editor for Telicom, the journal of the ISPE.

Edward R. Close, PhD, PE, is a recognized expert in environmental science, has served as environmental advisor to more than fifteen Fortune 500 companies, and has more than forty years experience in the environmental field. He is the author of numerous technical papers and five nonfiction books, including Nature’s MoldRx – The Non-Toxic Solution to Toxic Mold (2007), as well as the DVD: Toxic Mold – A Breakthrough Discovery.

Dr. Close has more than forty years’ experience in environmental planning and management, engineering, hydrology, hydrogeology, and industrial-waste management with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 1965-1978, and private consulting firms, 1978-1995. While working as a research hydrologist in the Water Resources Division of the USGS, he was chosen from hundreds of employees, nationwide, to become one of the seven scientists selected to form the first Department of Interior, Systems Analysis Mathematical Modeling Group, where he worked with internationally known environmental mathematicians, including Dr. Nickolas Matalas, Dr. John Bredehoft, and Dr. Benoit Mandelbrot.

In 1995, Dr. Close opened Close Environmental Consultants in Southeast Missouri. He continues to serve clients that range from Fortune 500 companies, mid-size and small local businesses to individual property owners as principal consultant with EJC Enterprises. He has worked in eleven U.S. States, on the island of Puerto Rico, and in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Dr. Close is a member of numerous professional societies, including the Indoor Air Quality Association (IAQA), the National Society of Professional Engineers, the American Water Resources Association, the National Water Well Association, the American Institute of Hydrology, the Cape Area Engineers, MENSA, and the International Society for Philosophical Enquiry (ISPE). He currently serves as Science Editor for “Telecom,” an ISPE quarterly periodical, is a Registered Professional Engineer (PE) in the State of Missouri, a Registered Environmental Site Assessor, a Registered Well Installer, and a Registered Professional Hydrologist.

Dr. Close has on-going interests in language, linguistics, symbolic logic, and consciousness studies. One of his books, Transcendental Physics (1997), explores the interface of modern physics and consciousness and has been cited in numerous publications including Dr. David Stewart’s book The Chemistry of Essential Oils Made Simple.

——————————–

This is the Coast to Coast AM show description (from coasttocoastam.com) of the show they were on:

Consciousness & Reality
Date: 11-02-11
Host: George Noory
Guests: Dr. Vernon Neppe, Edward R. Close, Jerome Corsi

Neuropsychiatrist Dr. Vernon Neppe and physicist Dr. Edward Close discussed their work integrating science, mathematics, and philosophy with consciousness studies to arrive at their new paradigm shifting model– “Reality Begins with Consciousness.” Neppe (who appeared in the 2nd & 4th hours) pointed out how every ‘Theory of Everything,’ such as put forth by Einstein and Hawking, has had major failings because they haven’t factored in consciousness into the equation. He described three levels of consciousness– neurological, psychological, and a kind of meta-consciousness which pulls in information from all sources, and “technically would not require a brain…and implies infinity.”

Meta-consciousness suggests that life-after-death is a reality, as consciousness can exist outside the brain, Neppe noted. “In our model, we cogently argue that time is not just one linear dimension that goes past, present, future, but that there are several different dimensions of time,” and all of existence could be said to exist at the same time because “we have an extended amount of time that always is, was, and will exist,” he continued. Dr. Close (appearing in the third hour) commented that scientific views have been limited for many years, and required a more expansive paradigm or framework.

Using mathematics, Close developed his theory of “dimensional extrapolation,” which suggests the existence of additional dimensions– at least 10, which coincides with what has been said in string theory. There are three dimensions of time, three of space, and three of consciousness, and a 10th dimension that is “transfinite,” he detailed. Humans inhabit all of these dimensions, “however there are also other forms of consciousness that inhabit some of the dimensions” that may or may not impinge on what we experience through our physical senses, he explained. “The universe itself is conscious and intelligent and has an innate order to it,” Neppe added.

According to these two scientists, there was nothing that ruled out the existence of God in their Theory of Everything. One of them also said that their science colleagues were afraid to talk about UFOs because they were afraid their reputation might be damaged and would not get the support they wanted or were getting from the University they were in. I don’t remember if these scientists believed in intelligent design or not. They did however believe in UFOs and psychic phenomenon, and said that those scientists who denied such things were real were brainwashed. And if you read their biography, it’s clear that these are not simple idiots but among the top “wise” of the world. One of them is even an expert in psychology, brain medicines, and even on how the brain physically works! So if they are saying Mainstream Scientists are (in general), brainwashed, and you combine that statement with the claims of scientists who believe in Intelligent Design and/or the Bible and ones who are also accomplished ones (and combine that with the former atheist champion Antony Flew‘s statements against atheism); it puts Mainstreamers in a very bad light and is strong evidence that they are not trustworthy with philosophical or religious truths, let alone ones discovered through the classical scientific method of Mainstreamers. <a href="http://amzn.to/thoeryofeverything“>Dr. Close published a book this Theory of Everything. I’m not sure why Neppe isn’t included as at least an editor since I thought I heard them say they both worked on this theory, or maybe Neppe just “peer reviewed” it. The show can be heard on Youtube, just click here. It’s sad that it will take seeing God himself and being before the entrance to Hell before some will finally believe in God and his justice, and by that time, there will be no more mercy, no more offer of salvation.

Categories: Mainstream Science Cult, philosophy, Theories of Everything (TOEs) Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Senator Bernie Sanders, Out of Touch Liberal Voted Against August 2nd Debt Ceiling Bill


Senator Bernie Sanders, helping the Jews, liberals and socialists to look bad

About 2 hours ago I listened to Bernie Sanders, a junior senator from Vermont, and one of SEVEN senators who voted to keep funding the infamous A.C.O.R.N. AFTER it was exposed), said on CNN today, sometime around 3 PM I think, why he voted AGAINST the debt deal that Obama recently signed to raise the debt ceiling. He said, to my amazement, that it was because it would cut hundreds of thousands of police and EVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION jobs, and a few others including fire protection. Did he say police and environmental protection!? Dead give away of a liberal when you mention environmental protection, and shows an out-of-touch person when you say police, as if whatever American police anywhere simply make things better (just like democrats Bernie probably thinks does us good, he probably thinks it would also be a tragedy if the TSA also lost their jobs). Bernie claims that he is a democratic socialist, big surprise. He also said on CNN at that time that the citizens who were calling him were making known to him that they were mainly worried if they would be getting their social security checks, able to send their kids to college (anyone heard about the student loan scam that the government involved itself in yet?) and if they would get their meal-on-wheels. When asked if the default would have been disastrous, he said, “yes”, but also said before that the deal was negotiable, but mentioned that so was social security being cancelled. But, despite it being negotiable, and up against the day of default, Bernie said he voted against the deal. Who elected this person and why is he still in office? Does Bernie know yet the terrible actions of the EPA, like promoting fluoride in the public water supply? Does he know that fluoride is harmful to human cells and bone?

Days after terrorists brought down the World Trade Center towers, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the air was safe to breathe, but that proved to be a dangerously optimistic assessment. Nearly two years later, EPA’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) reported that the EPA “did not have sufficient data and analyses to make such a blanket statement,” as “air monitoring data was lacking for several pollutants of concern.” – Source

If not, why not? Truly liberals are destroying the country.

References:

latest in a long line of bogus assaults on dioxin
Is [the] EPA ready for the truth about dioxin?
Vanishing Act [of the EPA]
EPA Ignores Advisers On Particulate Matter Standards
EPA Takes a Lax Approach to E-Waste Monitoring, GAO Report Finds
EPA’s Failure To Publicize Drinking Water Data Prompts Agency, Congress To Rethink Policies
EPA’s New Particulate Matter Standards Fail To Protect Public Health
EPA Fails to address Chemical Evaluation Problems
Farm Bureau Sues EPA Over Chesapeake Bay Cleanup
Home builders group sues EPA over new Chesapeake Bay pollution regulations
Corruption and Fraud at the EPA
Investigatiion of Corruption of Science Panels at EPA
Warning: This bill [on the National Uniformity for Foods Act] could make you sickEnvironmentalist Corruption: EPA funds Green Groups That Sue the Government
The EPA Versus the USA
Dow’s Toxic Legacy Of EPA Corruption
The Case Against Fluoride
Hobbes’ Mistake – The Rational Case For Anarchy

Evolutionist Fantasies – Logical Fallacies Made by Evolutionists

June 19, 2011 4 comments

Post link: www.gaydna.tk

Yesterday, on Coast to Coast AM, “Ian Punnett was joined by psychology professor Douglas Kenrick for a discussion on how the primitive, animalistic underside of human nature, with its sexual fantasies and homicidal tendencies, has actually given rise to the most positive features of our race.” I listened to this show and found it interesting that this professor said that those who were exclusively homosexual were “a puzzle” to evolutionists, because it didn’t help to spread their genes. He made a one or two other nonsensical statements like this, which evolutionists often repeat, which is that “genes want to spread” / “copy themselves”. They do this so often without explaining further what they mean, that such insane-talk can be taken literally. Evolutionists literally believe that animals “desire to spread their genes”, as if that that is what they are thinking when they are “in heat” or trying to mate, and are literally “looking for a mate with good genes” or “the best genes”. It’s absolutely stupid to say such things. Animals obviously are not intelligent to think such things, and how much less would genes have thoughts and desires? And back to the homosexuality “puzzle” which he seemed to imply must have some usefulness; says who? Why would it have usefulness in evolution? Why can’t something be a non-useful trait in evolution? Douglas said himself that exclusive homosexuality is an irrational choice, and yet he insisted that it must have some usefulness that couldn’t be seen (a clear contradiction). Is he biased? Is he double-minded because he is pandering to the homosexuals “community” and the liberals that determine his pay or whether he gets paid or not? Why doesn’t he just say, “It’s an aberration that repeatedly gets eliminated like evolution, like a harmful genetic mutation”. He also said that, “It’s not like homosexuality is a choice”, which was evidence of his bias. Who says it’s not a choice and where is the evidence? There are homosexuals who have said that it is a choice. There are also former homosexuals. Sexual attraction is also something that develops over time; people’s tastes change. And who would argue that babies are born being sexually attracted to anything? Are babies also born in the act of theft? This claim that babies can be born gay and is why they are gay or bisexual seems to be tied in to the illogical belief and excuse that God made sinners. For example, it’s common for ignorant and confused people to blame God for themselves being corrupt, asking, “Why did God make people sinful?” or “Why did God make me gay?” That’s as nonsensical as asking, “Why did God ecreat me in the act of stealing a car?”; no one is created in the act of stealing, lying, murdering, having sexual thoughts or committing adultery, married to anyone, or born a “Jew” (“Jew” and “Jewish” are racial words which are often incorrectly used in place of “Judaism”) or Christian. And a side note: The “Free Will” Christians who often make these claims of God making them the way they are (in the act of doing something including lusting to do certain evil things) are contradicting their claim that they have a completely free will which God isn’t allowed to and doesn’t “mess with”.

Also, does evolution also have desires and want to perpetuate itself? Yet so called “scientists” like Professor Douglas and others who believe in evolution, especially evolution-scientists, keep making the clear logical fallacy of giving emotions to dna and genes, and another fallacy, which is giving animals (and they consider humans to also be animals) false motives. It’s also bizarre that they give animals and their “genes” and dna the same motives, as if the dna and genes that exist in the animal they are in have separate minds of their own and are not apart of one being (creature). Even if they are speaking figuratively, it is a bad form of teaching to repeatedly do this (as bad as the nonsensical cliches “science tells us” and “science says”) and not explain what you mean, and to keep doing that leads to the ones you saying it to, believing such fallacies and to their own hurt, leading them to Hell because of believing such stupid and illogical things. It may be that certain evolution-scientists used this stupid talk to make it easier for kids and “stupid people” to understand, and got into the bad habit of repeatedly explaining things this way, and/or that certain ones with bad intent, noticed that by saying “dna is programmed to replicate”, which some evolutionists will admit, gives the correct implication that it was intelligently programmed (because mindless things like evolution and so called “nature” do not program things, and obviously dna didn’t create or program itself), and in their hatred of God and the Bible, didn’t and don’t want anyone to know or believe the truth, which is that we were created by God and that the laws of universe, including our biology, were made by him.

Categories: creation science, creationism, evolution propaganda, Evolutionist Education, evolutionist morality, Intelligent Design vs Darwinian Evolution Theory Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Great Gravity Probe B Hoax: More Evolutionist (Anti-Christian) Fraud

May 13, 2011 1 comment

Sadly, evolutionists have further wrecked science, spreading more lies in the astronomy field, spreading more confusion and causing more scientific and technological stagnation and religious/spiritual confusion as a result. They have done so this time by making false claims about the Gravity Probe B satellite experiment, which in 2008 NASA had made clear was a failed experiment. But now, in March 2011, it’s suddenly a success. Look at how much propaganda was spread by the experimenters:

78 news articles claiming that the GPBSE was a success, and many blogs, including Michio Kaku’s.

Even Wikipedia is spreading the hoax which is evident from the title of the Gravity Probe B experiment picture they placed on the Gravity Probe B page. It says, “Gravity_Probe_B_Confirms_the_Existence_of_Gravitomagnetism.jpg” (the same picture I used for this post). I wonder if that was the original title or if some weasel retitled it.

At this Google knol link here, physics researcher Michael Suede points out why the claim of success and vindication is false, among other reasons for Relativity being false. He claims that the GPB error data was used to produce a positive result, which the geocentrist Malcom Bowden predicted would happen.

If you hate reading or would rather watch videos of evidence against General Relativity, here are some videos on Youtube:

Einstein Was Wrong – Falsifying Observational Evidence Presented

Quasars: Why Einstein Was Wrong

Related Videos and Articles:

Geoncentrism Evidence:

Hidden scientific evidence for geocentrism

Evidence of Geocentrism 1 of 3

Evidence of Geocentrism 2 of 3

Evidence of Geocentrism 3 of 3

Geocentricism – The Orrery

The geocentric Venus-Mars-cycle – animation

Earth, Venus, Sun: Geocentric Orrery

Geocentric Model with Sun and Venus

Geocentric model of the solar system, demonstrating the celestial sphere and epicycles

Morning Meteors Explain Geocentrism

Geocentricity – Satellites + Mach

GEOCENTRISM – Sagnac’s experiment – an animated explanation

Geocentricity explains the seasons

The Static Earth – The Geostationary Model works!

Geocentric Universe – Celestial Poles

GEOCENTRICITY – An animated explanation of “Airy’s Failure”

Galileo – Quadricentennial Myth vs fact

A written rebuttal against the arguments of Los Almos’ Nieto’s arguments against geocentrism

Big Bang Contradictions:

Technical Paper on Plasma Cosmology and Big Bang

The Big Bang Theory–A Scientific Critique

Fast stars challenge big bang origin for dwarf galaxies

Why we’ve got the cosmological constant all wrong (note the comments too)

New Discovery: Dwarf Galaxies May Nix Theory of Dark Matter in the Universe

Faster Than Light? Neutrino Finding Puzzles Scientists

Faster than a Speeding Light Wave

The First Test That Proves General Theory of Relativity Wrong

Was the Speed of Light Faster In the Early Universe?

Faster Than the Speed of Light: The Story of a Scientific Speculation

Speed of Light May Have Varied in the Early Universe

Copernicus and his Revolutions

The Decrease In the Speed of Light – An Update On Developments

Reports of the Death of Speed of Light Decay are Premature

On the Constancy of the Speed of Light

Starlight and Time

Categories: Astronomy, evolution propaganda, evolution propaganda, Physics Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Characteristics of the Mainstream Science Cult and How It Imprisons the World

Post link: http://vainstream.tk

Mainstream Science is both a propaganda system and philosophy (A belief or system of beliefs accepted as authoritative by some group or school) controlled by various rich persons who are against obedience to the God of the Bible. It is also a cult of various personalities, their main founders being, besides Satan, Kepler, Copernicus, Darwin and Einstein, mainly Copernicus, Darwin and Einstein, which are like an evil version of the Christian Trinity. The equivalent of spiritual prophets who came after the founders, were/are Galileo, Bernard Shaw, Frederick Nietzsche, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Richard Dawkins, Mike Shermer, and to some degree, Michio Kaku. It also includes and any scientist who strongly oppose the claim that God exists, or who refuse to say that he does, who claim that even if he does exist, has no concern about what happens around Him and who say or imply that there is no evidence for the Bible being true. The core beliefs and propaganda are these:

1) Sentient aliens inside of our solar system don’t exist and any that are outside can’t come to earth because nothing can have the intelligence to make a portable energy source or engine that would allow them or any unmanned machine to get to Earth.

2) Machines that can travel faster than light are impossible to make.

3) Communication that can be done faster than light is impossible.

4) Aliens can’t be more intelligent than humans.

5) It’s so improbable that aliens would find us that it will never happen because there is nothing special about our location in the universe for anything intelligent to come to us and because we haven’t existed long enough to be found

6) If aliens made it to earth they would be perfect and so never have any accidents, like whatever ship they come in to Earth, crashing on our planet.

7) The universe came into existence about 30 billion years ago for no reason from an unknown thing.

8) The event that created the universe was not caused or directed by anything intelligent and galaxies, planets, stars, asteroids and comets weren’t either.

9) The creation of life was not created by anything intelligent nor it’s development directed by anything intelligent (nor could it have been), and only humans and human like beings on earth when they came into existence were able to intelligent direct things in the universe to their liking, like breeding plants and animals and creating tools.

10) Giant hair-covered or hairless hominids, including humans, can’t and don’t exist and couldn’t have for the past 100,000 years.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

11) Dinosaurs never lived with humans and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

12) Humans didn’t exist before 100,000 years ago and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

13) Dinosaurs didn’t exist for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.

14) Dinosaurs haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.

15) Dragons never existed (or: Dragon’s haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.)

16) You can’t know if God exists unless he is a material thing that you can both see and touch and perform experiments on to see that he is God.

17) If God exists he doesn’t care about what happens around Him.

18) Reincarnation is impossible.

19) Spirits don’t exist.

20) The physiology, behavior and communicatory behavior done by animals, which include humans, can be explained by Big Bang Theory, Darwinian Evolution Theory, including why rape and why abuse of children happens.

21) More energy can’t be produced than the energy that was needed to produce that energy (for example, zero point energy devices can’t exist).

22) Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity is at least 99% true, and no other theory of how the universe works therefore can replace it.

23) Quantum Mechanical Theory is 100% true.

24) Only mainstream scientists can known if something is true or not and only through them can non-mainstream scientists and non-scientists know if something is true or not.

25) Something is true if a consensus of mainstream scientists say it is (therefore, truth is not absolute, since they can change their minds, and therefore morality is also determined by the consensus of mainstream scientists, including whether or not rape and abusing child is good or bad).

26) Charles Darwin, Mark Twain, Frederick Nietzsche, Carl Sagan, Bernard Shaw, Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Richard Dawkins, Mike Shermer and Michio Kaku are like gods (or the wisest men and their claims that the things in this list are true cannot be refuted).

27) Theists who worship a person who chooses to be invisible or invisible to mainstream scientists cannot be scientists, nor can any who disbelieve any of the 21 things in this list. Stated another way: Religion isn’t compatible with science.

28) Disorder can produce order (for example the “Big Bang” or explosions can result in Earth with all the life in it and all the countless ordered complexity with all it’s countless types of beautiful features and emotions.

29) Low order can produce higher order (like how disorder can produce order).

30) Governments can’t keep secrets for longer than 40 years.

31) Governments have never conspired against their citizens

32) Governments can’t conspire against their citizens.

33) You should doubt whatever you hear, especially those who make claims against Mainstream Science.

34) Anyone who disagrees with mainstream science should be ignored, or laughed at or spoken out against, verbally harassed, lied about, physically abused or murdered.

35) Less intelligent people should be discriminated against.

36) If aliens did make it to Earth they would make it their goal to first meet with the mainstream scientists and peaceful leaders of the world, like President Obama.

37) The climate is getting more extreme and most of the land might mostly be under water one day, therefore, stop making any carbon dioxide.

First, some of you who read this list might notice it’s core beliefs (37 I listed) are more than double the size of the ten commandments. The ten commandments can be turned into 11 or 12 and 14 if you add the “Love the Lord your God with all your heart” and “Love your neighbor as yourself” ones, and 15 if you add the new commandment Jesus made, which was that Christians were to love each other above non-Christians (and therefore non-Christian neighbors). If you added other core beliefs of Fundamentalist Christians, like that salvation is only through Christ, that Christ suffered for 100% for 100% of whatever the sins were of whoever he suffered and died for, that God is Triune, that God is all knowing (including knows the future, that God is all powerful, and that the Bible (whatever God originally said) is perfect, and that God is always to be obeyed no matter what, then you get 20 “laws”, and despite that, there is still 17 more in the Mainstream Cult.

So, at the most, 38 more things (see “Second”) must be believed in the mainstream scientist list, to be a good, decent person, reasonable, logical and “acceptable” person. So, no one who supports mainstream science can say that Mainstream Science is much easier on the mind then the Bible and that the Bible has so many laws that it makes life unbearable, without contradicting themselves.

Second, there are obvious contradictions in this list:

How is Earth having been around for 4 billion years, which mainstream scientists claim (and could be a 38th law in the list), not long enough of a time for aliens to find us?! How extremely absurd that they claim that it’s too absurd for Earth to have only been around for 6,500 years, but absurd that after FOUR BILLION any aliens could find us! It’s as if their logic is totally backwards on everything!

If aliens would be more intelligent than us, then wouldn’t we be more intelligent than the aliens that consider us aliens? It makes no sense.

I can point out the errors in mainstream cultic thinking, easily:

1) Sentient aliens inside of our solar system don’t exist and any that are outside can’t come to earth because nothing can have the intelligence to make a portable energy source or engine that would allow them or any unmanned machine to get to Earth.

There’s no evidence for this belief; they are mere claims.

2) Machines that can travel faster than light are impossible to make.

No evidence for this belief.

3) Communication that can be done faster than light is impossible.

It’s impossible in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, not other theories or ideas.

4) Aliens can’t be more intelligent than humans.

No evidence for this belief, and it’s a contradiction since other aliens would consider us “aliens”.

5) It’s so improbable that aliens would find us that it will never happen because there is nothing special about our location in the universe for anything intelligent to come to us and because we haven’t existed long enough to be found

No evidence for this belief. There is even evidence against it: Tychonic Geocentric Theory and the implication in the Bible that Earth is the center of the universe. Tycho is mostly an accepted scientist who contributed to astronomy science, and God, he made it: God + Tycho, how can you beat that?

6) If aliens made it to earth they would be perfect and so never have any accidents, like whatever ship they come in to Earth, crashing on our planet.

No evidence for this belief. Why would the ability to get from a far star to Earth = you become a god, especially when Mainstreamers supposedly don’t know how to travel faster than light, and therefore what would be required to do so!? For all they know you could do it with some combination of parts from Radio Shack and a nuclear submarine.

7) The universe came into existence about 30 billion years ago for no reason from an unknown thing.

No evidence for this belief, and much evidence against the Big Bang, so much it exhausts me to try and list it all, and I never end up finishing a book about it (which I keep trying to make).

8) The event that created the universe was not caused or directed by anything intelligent and galaxies, planets, stars, asteroids and comets weren’t either.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

9) The creation of life was not created by anything intelligent nor it’s development directed by anything intelligent (nor could it have been), and only humans and human like beings on earth when they came into existence were able to intelligent direct things in the universe to their liking, like breeding plants and animals and creating tools.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. There is also something silly about those who parrot this claim, which is that food only tastes good to us because man learned how to breed what he liked… if that isn’t arrogant and ignorant, what is? How stupid must you be, and ignorant, to not know that tons of wild food taste good, and that we still rely on it? It’s so extremely dumb to take glory away from God with such a claim. People who make this claim are either very very hateful and self-centered on their own feelings, but not mentally ill, or have anti-social personality disorder, and therefore are mentally ill. It’s also dumb because the people who make such a claim imply that they’ve tasted the differences between the many wild and “domesticated” things in the world, and that only what they prefer is what tastes good (and that wild foods don’t taste good at all). Do you see how dumb that is, what bizarre logic that is? It reminds me of North Korea’s dead and insane leader, whatever his name was.

10) Giant hair-covered or hairless hominids, including humans, can’t and don’t exist and couldn’t have for the past 100,000 years.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. Just look at the heretic Christian Steve Quayle’s site for pictures and Burlington News for extensive records of findings of giant human skeletons.

11) Dinosaurs never lived with humans and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. Just read the book Forbidden Archeology, made by a Hindu who believes Earth is millions or billions of years old (apparently finding out that mainstream scientists are oppressive liars wasn’t a big enough bang for him that their theories might also be oppressive lies).

12) Humans didn’t exist before 100,000 years ago and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

13) Dinosaurs didn’t exist for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

14) Dinosaurs haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

15) Dragons never existed (or: Dragon’s haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.)

No evidence for this belief, much against it.

16) You can’t know if God exists unless he is a material thing that you can both see and touch and perform experiments on to see that he is God.

And why would this be true? No evidence for this belief, much against it.

17) If God exists he doesn’t care about what happens around Him.

If God doesn’t exist how could you know what his personality be like if he did?! Mainstream scientists keep replacing the God of the Bible, like pathologically mentally ill people, with a God in their own image: one who does whatever they want and thinks however they want him to: that’s not “God”, that’s a slave!

18) Reincarnation is impossible.

It’s not impossible, but there is no evidence that shows it to be true, and a lot of indirect evidence against it (some which I point out out here, the rest scattered throughout my journal which is evidence for the Bible, and the Bible contradicts reincarnation, as it says man only gets one life to live here, and then either goes to Heaven, or must face condemnation and be imprisoned in Hell).

19) Spirits don’t exist.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

20) The physiology, behavior and communicatory behavior done by animals, which include humans, can be explained by Big Bang Theory, Darwinian Evolution Theory, including why rape and why abuse of children happens.

There are so many things about animals and humans that are not just “not easily explained” but for which no explanation can even be imagined, as other evolutionists have admitted in almost the same way I just said it, that you can feel (if you’re not insane and have read the news and about evolution a lot) that whatever explanation that is come up with, would be a mere claim, and probably stupid. For example: how can behaviors done by stupid animals, like maggots, which show wisdom or rather knowledge of what another thing is thinking (like larvae disguising themselves to continue eating prey) have evolved to have such knowledge? How would a newborn thing “know” to disguise itself by random events that lead to it being what it is? Try and imagine: some chemicals come together one day and turn into a thing that replicates and attaches to other chemicals to exist for a while, and then eventually, it gets nervous system, then a brain that can make decisions about where it wants to go and eat and what to touch, then it gets the ability to smell, taste, feel by touch, see, hear, and then emotions of all kinds, then the ability to talk, then to know what other animals are thinking, and then the desire to dance, sing, collect things, make art and tools and the desire to explore and have relations with other animals and aliens. Not necessarily in that order or having all the sensory abilities, but how? No one has even come up with close to an explanation as to how such things would happen by random events so that billions of “religious fanatics” would become mainstream scientists, instead, they stay loyal to whatever God or gods they worship. So clearly, there is something about theistic religions that are convincing the majority of the world to stay theists and religious. And there are many agnostics who refuse to entirely embrace mainstreamism (which ironically sounds like “extremism”).

21) More energy can’t be produced than the energy that was needed to produce that energy (for example, zero point energy devices can’t exist).

And the evidence for this is? I’m also curious to know then how nuclear power plants can be explained: If I cause an explosion that leads to a nuclear detonation that puts out more energy than I did to make the explosion, would that violate this law? Or is all the energy I used and whatever energy was used to get me to that point taken into the equation?

22) Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity is at least 99% true, and no other theory of how the universe works therefore can replace it.

There’s much evidence against GTR and Special Relativity. For those of you who want to see it, ask, and I might show it to you if I’m in a position to, or just search the Internet.

23) Quantum Mechanical Theory is 100% true.

There’s scientists who claim to have come up with evidence that it is not true.

24) Only mainstream scientists can know if something is true or not and only through them can non-mainstream scientists and non-scientists know if something is true or not.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. It’s also used or implied against those who find evidence against mainstream science, like some fossil that a non-scientist discovered which shows Mainstream age dating to be wrong.

It’s also contradictory: if only Mainstreamers can know what is true, then how can they cause anyone else to know, who isn’t one? It’s like saying, “Only Catholics can have the Holy Spirit, and therefore you can only be a Catholic if you have the Holy Spirit.”: Then how does anyone become a Catholic in the first place? Or a better analogy: “It’s impossible for there to be any other king than God, but he can make you a king if he decides to,” which makes no sense because it’s supposed to be impossible.

25) Something is true if a consensus of mainstream scientists say it is (therefore, truth is not absolute, since they can change their minds, and therefore morality is also determined by the consensus of mainstream scientists, including whether or not rape and abusing child is good or bad).

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. If it were true than racism, discrimination against people merely over their age, rape and child abuse could be “good” and “moral”, but they obviously aren’t to those who still have still have their moral instincts regarding the right or wrongness of those things.

26) Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo, Charles Darwin, Mark Twain, Frederick Nietzsche, Carl Sagan, Bernard Shaw, Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Richard Dawkins, Mike Shermer and Michio Kaku are like gods (or the wisest men and their claims that the things in this list are true cannot be refuted).

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. That Nietzsche committed suicide says a lot, if he was supposed to be one of the most logical and right-thinking people ever.

27) Theists who worship a person who chooses to be invisible or invisible to mainstream scientists cannot be scientists, nor can any who disbelieve any of the 21 things in this list. Stated another way: Religion isn’t compatible with science.

No evidence for this belief, mountains of obvious against it: at least 40% of the people who are employed as scientists in the world are religious, and the majority of inventions in the world, or the components (which are also inventions) that make up those inventions, are religious people. Even if it were a smaller number at this time, the fact is: most of the kinds of types inventions ever made, were made by religious people, or those living in a mostly religious environment. Rarely if ever is something new come up with these days, let alone something very useful or affordable, let alone by a mainstream scientist. Even if something is, it’s often hidden from the public or ignored by other mainstream scientists in favor of things which already exist or inferior things.

28) Disorder can produce order (for example the “Big Bang” or explosions can result in Earth with all the life in it and all the countless ordered complexity with all it’s countless types of beautiful features and emotions.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

29) Low order can produce higher order (like how disorder can produce order).

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

30) Governments can’t keep secrets for longer than 40 years.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

31) Governments have never conspired against their citizens

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

32) Governments can’t conspire against their citizens.

No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.

33) You should doubt (be skeptical of) whatever you hear and see, especially those who make claims against Mainstream Science.

Why? Why not just use “science” to see if a thing is true without making up your mind first? Why assume? Is assuming scientific? Presuming and assuming are stupid and evil and anti-scientific. To teach a child to doubt everything except mainstream science sets them up for a pathological disorder like Insanity of Doubt, a mental disorder which Mainstreamers managed to erase from the psychology field. They are even trying to get rid of narcissism as a disorder, using the excuse that “it’s common,” which is not a logical reason. Child abuse is common, that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be looked at as illogical or immoral or be seen as good even. Something also to note is that “Skeptics” in ancient times were a group of pagan truth seekers. Mainstreamers however have hijacked it and made their own dishonest version of this group. Insanity of Doubt can lead to illogical behaviors, for example not doing something which is logical because you doubt it is logical and that you will be vilified, mocked, harassed or killed for doing the right thing. Teaching people to be skeptical leads them to develop a pathological avoidance of doing what is morally correct and logical, which includes learning what is morally correct and logical, let alone being moral and logical, out of fear of the previously mentioned things and out of doubt that it is useful to learn them.

34) Anyone who disagrees with mainstream science should be ignored, or laughed at or spoken out against, verbally harassed, lied about, physically abused or murdered.

Hence why many millions have been killed in the past 100 years, since Darwin-worship began. And there’s no evidence for belief 33, and evidence against it. Hence why science has largely stagnated and why little has been advanced in propulsion and energy, and why we are stuck on this pollution-accumulating planet.

35) Less intelligent people should be discriminated against.

Hence why many millions have been killed in the past 100 years, since Darwin-worship began. And there’s no evidence for belief 33, and evidence against it. Hence the Eugenics movement and the many forced sterilizations of Americans in the past.

36) If aliens did make it to Earth they would make it their goal to first meet with the mainstream scientists and peaceful leaders of the world, like President Obama.

Mainstreamers are filled with mentally ill people, and Obama is a big business pandering warmonger, just like the former Bush presidents.

37) The climate is getting more extreme and most of the land might mostly be under water one day, therefore, stop making any carbon dioxide and spend money to do so.

But according to the implication of the Mainstreamer Science religion, we’ll evolve to live under water and some humans will be amphibous with something like gills or some other underwater breathing system, or did you forget your own “scientific” Waterworld movie? And without carbon dioxide all plants will die. If all plants die, about every other living thing would die and all the eart would be desert, mud or rock. I’d rather live under water. It’s also unlikely: With humans needing more and more water, they’d eventually begin mining ice and creating more desalinization plants, and using slave labor if they had to, unless there was something to stop them from doing so, so the water would end up in us, animals, plants, us, goods requiring water and containers, not wasted into the ocean. I bet it would be cheaper and more productive to build nuclear powerplants and nuclear powered drill machines to colonize Antarctica and Greenland and make heat radiating cities to turn the ice and snow into water than can be used for drinking, food and technology. Or is it better for them to remain under ice forever, while the warmer lands gets more expensive and more polluted? No, it’s not better.

38) There are too many humans on the planet, and there should only be allowed to be a billion or less for all time.

There’s no evidence that there are too many humans. There’s plenty of land left to grow food on and plenty of underwater land to build underwater buildings in and we can build colonies on the Moon and Mars and space stations. But the jealous, greedy, pleasure-addicted and God-hating, joy-killing, “if we can’t have fun then no one can” Mainstream Scientists are deliberately discouraging it, which is why it isn’t done, and why everyone is mislead into devoting their money and energy into living only on land, and suffering for it.

In conclusion, mainstream scientists are a willfully ignorant cult who hinder and crush other scientists and threads of other scientific fields without a logic reason, like Medical Scientists and Medical Science and Creation Scientists and Creation Science, and who endanger lives and kill people (over 260,000,000 deaths, millions of whom were unborn babies). They are part of the reason that the public doesn’t have anti-gravity or zero-point energy technology and why there is a constant increasing flow of crime and illogical behavior and increasing pathological mental disorders like narcissism, sociopathism, and psychopathism. Those who support mainstream scientists or their bad logic and propaganda are also part of the reason that these things have happened and are still happening. They are part of the reason that many cures for sicknesses and diseases are suppressed, lost or no longer known about. They are part of the reason millions of children are suffering in the USA and a billion more outside of America. They are part the reason the world is in poverty. The people who fund them are also part of the reason, and the leaders over them, and the leader of them, which is Satan.

They are deliberately ignorant of and fight against and shun the facts, including what correct morality is (obedience to whatever laws Jesus said are still to be obeyed) when they see it. Therefore, they should be fought against and shunned and not be given any funding. They are a hypocritical, deceptive, misleading, body-destroying, parasitic cult just like Karl Marx cults, Scientology, Raeleanism and other UFO cults. Those who are against Mainstreamers should set up their own.

Note: Michio and Einstein are not atheists, nor do they fit perfectly into Maintream Scientism because of this, though the Mainstream Media, who have the same leaders as the MS’s, try to spin them as being Mainstreamers. Spinoza, who some might consider one of the gods of Mainstreamers, also was not an atheist. All three believe God caused and directed the formation of the universe. Michio speaks through Einstein to let the world know this, and to keep his job and Mainstreamers from harassing him. I also have not said that all Mainstreamers are equally bad, and hate God so much that they can feel that hatred. Some hate him, but don’t think about him, and so their hatred is like someone who hates a person that they don’t think about.

These are a list of prominent scientists who are either haven’t conformed to the Mainstream Science or who are not promoters of atheism (which is done by the most hardened Mainstreamers), but who haven’t been rejected by them (probably because these scientists have so much credentials and credibility with the masses that to do so would causes mainstream scientists to be seen for what they really are: an extremist anti-God cult, and then rejected by most people):

Arthur C. Clark (whose faith wavered about God’s existence and who wouldn’t mock those who weren’t Mainstreamers, at least not in an obvious way)
Albert Einstein (a deist creationist, whose “scientific” theory was unfortunately has been a great hindrance to science and religion, and one of the greatest next to Darwinian Evolutionary Theory and Freudian Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy)
Michio Kaku (who said on Coast to Coats AM, “the Bible is a scientific book”)
William R. Corliss (who points out how evolutionists ignore “ooparts” and make absurd reasons for it)
Maurice Allais
Stanton Friedman (who points out the absurd reasons Mainstreamers use to explain away the significance of UFOs)
Stephen Hawking (a prominent handicapped physicist who is against atheism, though still panders to atheists)
Thomas Edison (a creationist, but was also a schemer with little conscience)
Dr. Andrew Wakefield (a British former surgeon and medical researcher known for his independant exposure of the causative connection between the measles, mumps and the rubella (MMR) vaccine, autism and autistic enterocolitis. The hypocrite Mainstream Science Cult, atheist, liberal, frauds of Wikipedia and Conservapedia libel him as being a fraud based on a fraudulent news report from the Sunday Times reporter Brian Deer and the British General Medical Council (more Mainstreamers)).
Dr. Paul Connett (a Professor of Chemistry at St. Lawrence University who is an anti-fluoride activist who protests against the fluoridated public water supplies being forced on the public)
Michael Behe (a famous scientists whose book Darwin’s Black Box caused a huge controversy when it showed flaws in Darwinian beliefs)
Here is a huge list of scientists who are opposed to the physics knowledge filter caused by the Big Bang Propgandists: http://www.cosmologystatement.org
Martin Fleischmann ()
Dr. Stanley Pons ()
Bockris
Dr. Claude Allegre (“a top geophysicist and French Socialist who has authored more than 100 scientific articles and written 11 books and received numerous scientific awards including the Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical Society of the United States, converted from climate alarmist to skeptic in 2006”)
Bruno Wiskel (a geologist “of the University of Alberta recently reversed his view of man-made climate change and instead became a global warming skeptic. Wiskel was once such a big believer in man-made global warming that he set out to build a “Kyoto house” in honor of the UN sanctioned Kyoto Protocol which was signed in 1997”)

Here is a huge list of scientists opposed to the knowledge filter caused by Global Warming Propagandists:

There is also a famous writer, science educator, teacher, and philosopher named Loren Eiseley, who is not rejected by Mainstream Scientists, and he exposed Darwin as a credit thief who took most of his evolution theory from others, and changed it (by removing God) and adding that animals could turn into other animals or new kinds of animals (“species” was the word he used for “kind”, but confusingly it can also mean “type” and the word continues to be used ambiguously by Mainstreamers to this day).

Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called “consensus” on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.

The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007.

Even some in the establishment media now appear to be taking notice of the growing number of skeptical scientists. In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics “appear to be expanding rather than shrinking.” Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears “bite the dust.” (LINK) In addition, many scientists who are also progressive environmentalists believe climate fear promotion has “co-opted” the green movement. (LINK)

This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate.

Many of the scientists featured in this report consistently stated that numerous colleagues shared their views, but they will not speak out publicly for fear of retribution. Atmospheric scientist Dr. Nathan Paldor, Professor of Dynamical Meteorology and Physical Oceanography at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, author of almost 70 peer-reviewed studies, explains how many of his fellow scientists have been intimidated.

“Many of my colleagues with whom I spoke share these views and report on their inability to publish their skepticism in the scientific or public media,” Paldor wrote. – Source

Categories: Pseudoscience, Skepticism, skeptics Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Massive Nemesis of Stupidity in Nonexistant Oort Cloud Threatens to Destroy Earth’s Science Even Further

December 10, 2010 6 comments

Massive Nemesis of Stupidity in Nonexistant Oort Cloud Threatens to Destroy Earth’s Science Even Further:

Massive dark object ‘lurking on edge of solar system hurling comets at Earth’
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:28 PM on 10th December 2010
Comments (190) Add to My Stories
A massive dark object may be lurking on the edge of our solar system, according to scientists. [What ‘scientists’? Not all scientists despite the implication of this immoral weasel.]

Most comets that fly into the inner solar system seem to come from the outer region of the Oort cloud [seem to who you weasel? So you speak for everyone? Arrogant.]- a region of icy dust and debris left over from the birth of the solar system [it’s an evolutionist theory, not a known real region as you imply].

The cloud starts from a point about 93 billion miles from the Sun and stretches for around three light years and contains billions of comets, most of them small and hidden [so goes the theory, liar. And if most of them are small and hidden, how do you know this cloud exists, or your “scientists” friends? Contradict yourself much Mr. Evolutionist Pretending to Be a Scholarly Scientists and Journalist?].
A Nasa graphic which illustrates how the Oort Cloud surrounds our solar system. [really? It’s from NASA, that company packed full of creationist scientists? No.] Scientists believe [what scientists you weasel? All scientists? No.] that an object with a huge mass may be pushing comets towards Earth from the cloud[.][And? We should believe with these so far unknown scientists, because? Well because you’re talking pretentiously, like you’re king of the world, and mentioned scientists all believing so and so, and you mentioned NASA, the great center of scientific mastery, which is why it still uses rocket technology from the 60’s.]
Now new calculations suggest a large object that is up to four times as big as Jupiter could be responsible for sending them in our direction. [Cool: “Now new calculations”. I’m scared. I’ve now abandoned Christianity and recalculated my life to be atheist and believe in evolution and read dailymail all day long. I’m really productive now!]

The scientists [what scientists? ‘Just have faith’ right?] have analysed the comets in the Oort cloud [you can’t analyse something that hasn’t been found] and deduced that 25 per-cent of them would need a nudge by a body of at least Jupiter size before they changed orbit. [You still haven’t explained why these scientists believe in this flying elephant planet.]

Astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire at the University of Louisiana came up with theory said that ‘something smaller than a Jovian mass would not be strong enough to perform the task’. [You still haven’t explained why these scientists believe in this flying elephant planet.]
They believe that our solar system has a hidden ‘companion’ that has so far remained undetected. [You still haven’t explained why these scientists believe in this flying elephant planet, or why I should trust in these people. Oh I know: because you called them astrophysicists. They must be trustworthy..]
The scientists [the what? Repeat that 100 times in a row to brainwash me more.] have been studying the cloud using WISE, Nasa’s infra-red space telescope that is capable of detecting dark objects. [And what did they find?]
Matese said: ‘I think this whole issue will be resolved in the next five to 10 years, [Oh, they found nothing, and yet you speak of them as having found something. You wasted my time and the time of thousands of others.] because there’s surveys coming on line that will dwarf the comet sample we have today. [Because you said so.]

‘Whether these types of asymmetries in the directions that comets are coming from actually do exist or not will definitely be hammered out by those surveys,’ Matese added. [Wait: you mean you don’t know? But this article was about you and other “scientists” knowing.] ‘We anticipate that WISE is going to falsify or verify our conjecture.’ [Wait again: I thought you were already sure and full of evidence for this imaginary cloud. And uh, so why was this invisible planet of faith brought up again? Oh: sensationalism, draw in people to read your article. Liars won’t win in end, nor thieves. ]
About 3,200 long-period comets are known, one of the most famous being Hale-Bopp which was visible to even the naked eye during 1996 and 1997. [But where’s the cloud?]
Halley’s Comet, which reappears about every 75 years, is a ‘short-period’ comet from a different part of the Solar System called the Kuiper Belt.

[…]These occasional comet showers could be why the mass extinctions on Earth are so regular, some scientists believe. [What… is this an allusion to evolution… in an astrophysics article…? No: evolutionists never use propaganda in other fields of science, they never associate things like the Big Bang with evolution and then repeatedly mock Christians by asking them why they “always talking about the Big Bang and evolution as if they have something to do with each other,”… nah: they never do that…]

The research appeared in the online edition of the journal Icarus. [Sounds sciency and cool: must be trustworthy.]
‘Most planetary scientists would not be surprised if the largest undiscovered companion was Neptune-sized or smaller, but a Jupiter-mass object would be a surprise,’ Matese told SPACE.com [And how does this person know that it’s “most scientists” who would not be surprised at this? Did he take a poll? Is there a survey on this somewhere? ]
‘If the conjecture is indeed true, the important implications would relate to how it got there — touching on the early solar environment — and how it might have affected the subsequent distributions of comets and, to a lesser extent, the known planets.’ [“early solar system environment”: How early? Are you trying to bring us back to the Big Bang? Weasel.] – Source

It occurred to me after having finished this post, and then adding the tags for it, that as I typed planet x as part of the keywords, repeatedly, realized this dailymail article and the “scientists” it quotes were trying to cash in on the Planet X scam, something which is discussed on certain radio shows and websites repeatedly, to get more visitors and more money from advertisers.

“Most of them small and hidden” indeed, just like the good deeds of these “scientists”. They are all liars, just as God said.

The Huffington Post and Wikipedia is for Anti-Science Morons: Both Promote Lynne McTaggart

Talk about careless, stupid “a joke” and pathetic, the Huffington Post I just found out, has allowed the anti-science con artist  Lynne McTaggart to post a conspiracy rant claiming that Dan Brown’s “Science Fiction is Mostly Fact” speaking of his “The Lost Symbol” book. And wow what a clever title she came up with” “science fiction is fact” what a clever contrast! So original to say “why his lies are mostly truthful” too right? Lynn’s article begins with, “The most vehement criticism of Dan Brown’s new book The Lost Symbol concerns the view of many reviewers that while the material about Freemasonry may be based on fact, the science is more akin to science fiction.” Whatever. Lynn is a moron, she put out a book called “The Intention Experiment” in which she makes a big deal over something obviously false, which is that intentions can influence things, in other words, that you can will things to happen, such as events, not merely moving an object, in other words: WISHING! Talk about “wishful thinking”! When I made a sarcastic review of her book soon after it was listen on Amazon, the community moderators aggressively took action to suppress my review which was, as I intended, getting votes up immediately. Meanwhile they allow endless fake, malicious, sarcastic rants on books which promote or show evidence for creation science / intelligent design. Wikipedia even allows itself to be used to promote Lynn McMoron, meanwhile, they harassed me and aggressively, for including a page on the scientist prominent J.L. Naudin, aggressively attacking me for it and then deleting the page after pretentious consideration of it, and also for making a page on the prominent con artist Tom Bearden, for showing him to be a pseudo scientist while also attacking me for supposedly promoting Naudin for being a pseudo scientist and another scientist and inventor. The points: don’t trust the Huffington Post or Wikipedia. Liberals just make no sense: they latch on to main stream scientists in order to repel Christianity and promote them as legitimate unlike Christian ones, and at the same time also embrace clear pseudo scientists like McTaggert and Bearden in order to gain more followers against the honest Christian scientists. Their acceptance of liars in their hatred of God works against them; it self-defeating and so long as they do this, the greater technologies they desire, just in reach, will, in my opinion, continue to be withheld from the majority of them by God, and for the evil ones that do obtain or already have them, will not benefit the majority.