Post link: http://vainstream.tk
Mainstream Science is both a propaganda system and philosophy (A belief or system of beliefs accepted as authoritative by some group or school) controlled by various rich persons who are against obedience to the God of the Bible. It is also a cult of various personalities, their main founders being, besides Satan, Kepler, Copernicus, Darwin and Einstein, mainly Copernicus, Darwin and Einstein, which are like an evil version of the Christian Trinity. The equivalent of spiritual prophets who came after the founders, were/are Galileo, Bernard Shaw, Frederick Nietzsche, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Richard Dawkins, Mike Shermer, and to some degree, Michio Kaku. It also includes and any scientist who strongly oppose the claim that God exists, or who refuse to say that he does, who claim that even if he does exist, has no concern about what happens around Him and who say or imply that there is no evidence for the Bible being true. The core beliefs and propaganda are these:
1) Sentient aliens inside of our solar system don’t exist and any that are outside can’t come to earth because nothing can have the intelligence to make a portable energy source or engine that would allow them or any unmanned machine to get to Earth.
2) Machines that can travel faster than light are impossible to make.
3) Communication that can be done faster than light is impossible.
4) Aliens can’t be more intelligent than humans.
5) It’s so improbable that aliens would find us that it will never happen because there is nothing special about our location in the universe for anything intelligent to come to us and because we haven’t existed long enough to be found
6) If aliens made it to earth they would be perfect and so never have any accidents, like whatever ship they come in to Earth, crashing on our planet.
7) The universe came into existence about 30 billion years ago for no reason from an unknown thing.
8) The event that created the universe was not caused or directed by anything intelligent and galaxies, planets, stars, asteroids and comets weren’t either.
9) The creation of life was not created by anything intelligent nor it’s development directed by anything intelligent (nor could it have been), and only humans and human like beings on earth when they came into existence were able to intelligent direct things in the universe to their liking, like breeding plants and animals and creating tools.
10) Giant hair-covered or hairless hominids, including humans, can’t and don’t exist and couldn’t have for the past 100,000 years.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
11) Dinosaurs never lived with humans and couldn’t have.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
12) Humans didn’t exist before 100,000 years ago and couldn’t have.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
13) Dinosaurs didn’t exist for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.
14) Dinosaurs haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.
15) Dragons never existed (or: Dragon’s haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.)
16) You can’t know if God exists unless he is a material thing that you can both see and touch and perform experiments on to see that he is God.
17) If God exists he doesn’t care about what happens around Him.
18) Reincarnation is impossible.
19) Spirits don’t exist.
20) The physiology, behavior and communicatory behavior done by animals, which include humans, can be explained by Big Bang Theory, Darwinian Evolution Theory, including why rape and why abuse of children happens.
21) More energy can’t be produced than the energy that was needed to produce that energy (for example, zero point energy devices can’t exist).
22) Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity is at least 99% true, and no other theory of how the universe works therefore can replace it.
23) Quantum Mechanical Theory is 100% true.
24) Only mainstream scientists can known if something is true or not and only through them can non-mainstream scientists and non-scientists know if something is true or not.
25) Something is true if a consensus of mainstream scientists say it is (therefore, truth is not absolute, since they can change their minds, and therefore morality is also determined by the consensus of mainstream scientists, including whether or not rape and abusing child is good or bad).
26) Charles Darwin, Mark Twain, Frederick Nietzsche, Carl Sagan, Bernard Shaw, Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Richard Dawkins, Mike Shermer and Michio Kaku are like gods (or the wisest men and their claims that the things in this list are true cannot be refuted).
27) Theists who worship a person who chooses to be invisible or invisible to mainstream scientists cannot be scientists, nor can any who disbelieve any of the 21 things in this list. Stated another way: Religion isn’t compatible with science.
28) Disorder can produce order (for example the “Big Bang” or explosions can result in Earth with all the life in it and all the countless ordered complexity with all it’s countless types of beautiful features and emotions.
29) Low order can produce higher order (like how disorder can produce order).
30) Governments can’t keep secrets for longer than 40 years.
31) Governments have never conspired against their citizens
32) Governments can’t conspire against their citizens.
33) You should doubt whatever you hear, especially those who make claims against Mainstream Science.
34) Anyone who disagrees with mainstream science should be ignored, or laughed at or spoken out against, verbally harassed, lied about, physically abused or murdered.
35) Less intelligent people should be discriminated against.
36) If aliens did make it to Earth they would make it their goal to first meet with the mainstream scientists and peaceful leaders of the world, like President Obama.
37) The climate is getting more extreme and most of the land might mostly be under water one day, therefore, stop making any carbon dioxide.
First, some of you who read this list might notice it’s core beliefs (37 I listed) are more than double the size of the ten commandments. The ten commandments can be turned into 11 or 12 and 14 if you add the “Love the Lord your God with all your heart” and “Love your neighbor as yourself” ones, and 15 if you add the new commandment Jesus made, which was that Christians were to love each other above non-Christians (and therefore non-Christian neighbors). If you added other core beliefs of Fundamentalist Christians, like that salvation is only through Christ, that Christ suffered for 100% for 100% of whatever the sins were of whoever he suffered and died for, that God is Triune, that God is all knowing (including knows the future, that God is all powerful, and that the Bible (whatever God originally said) is perfect, and that God is always to be obeyed no matter what, then you get 20 “laws”, and despite that, there is still 17 more in the Mainstream Cult.
So, at the most, 38 more things (see “Second”) must be believed in the mainstream scientist list, to be a good, decent person, reasonable, logical and “acceptable” person. So, no one who supports mainstream science can say that Mainstream Science is much easier on the mind then the Bible and that the Bible has so many laws that it makes life unbearable, without contradicting themselves.
Second, there are obvious contradictions in this list:
How is Earth having been around for 4 billion years, which mainstream scientists claim (and could be a 38th law in the list), not long enough of a time for aliens to find us?! How extremely absurd that they claim that it’s too absurd for Earth to have only been around for 6,500 years, but absurd that after FOUR BILLION any aliens could find us! It’s as if their logic is totally backwards on everything!
If aliens would be more intelligent than us, then wouldn’t we be more intelligent than the aliens that consider us aliens? It makes no sense.
I can point out the errors in mainstream cultic thinking, easily:
1) Sentient aliens inside of our solar system don’t exist and any that are outside can’t come to earth because nothing can have the intelligence to make a portable energy source or engine that would allow them or any unmanned machine to get to Earth.
There’s no evidence for this belief; they are mere claims.
2) Machines that can travel faster than light are impossible to make.
No evidence for this belief.
3) Communication that can be done faster than light is impossible.
It’s impossible in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, not other theories or ideas.
4) Aliens can’t be more intelligent than humans.
No evidence for this belief, and it’s a contradiction since other aliens would consider us “aliens”.
5) It’s so improbable that aliens would find us that it will never happen because there is nothing special about our location in the universe for anything intelligent to come to us and because we haven’t existed long enough to be found
No evidence for this belief. There is even evidence against it: Tychonic Geocentric Theory and the implication in the Bible that Earth is the center of the universe. Tycho is mostly an accepted scientist who contributed to astronomy science, and God, he made it: God + Tycho, how can you beat that?
6) If aliens made it to earth they would be perfect and so never have any accidents, like whatever ship they come in to Earth, crashing on our planet.
No evidence for this belief. Why would the ability to get from a far star to Earth = you become a god, especially when Mainstreamers supposedly don’t know how to travel faster than light, and therefore what would be required to do so!? For all they know you could do it with some combination of parts from Radio Shack and a nuclear submarine.
7) The universe came into existence about 30 billion years ago for no reason from an unknown thing.
No evidence for this belief, and much evidence against the Big Bang, so much it exhausts me to try and list it all, and I never end up finishing a book about it (which I keep trying to make).
8) The event that created the universe was not caused or directed by anything intelligent and galaxies, planets, stars, asteroids and comets weren’t either.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
9) The creation of life was not created by anything intelligent nor it’s development directed by anything intelligent (nor could it have been), and only humans and human like beings on earth when they came into existence were able to intelligent direct things in the universe to their liking, like breeding plants and animals and creating tools.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. There is also something silly about those who parrot this claim, which is that food only tastes good to us because man learned how to breed what he liked… if that isn’t arrogant and ignorant, what is? How stupid must you be, and ignorant, to not know that tons of wild food taste good, and that we still rely on it? It’s so extremely dumb to take glory away from God with such a claim. People who make this claim are either very very hateful and self-centered on their own feelings, but not mentally ill, or have anti-social personality disorder, and therefore are mentally ill. It’s also dumb because the people who make such a claim imply that they’ve tasted the differences between the many wild and “domesticated” things in the world, and that only what they prefer is what tastes good (and that wild foods don’t taste good at all). Do you see how dumb that is, what bizarre logic that is? It reminds me of North Korea’s dead and insane leader, whatever his name was.
10) Giant hair-covered or hairless hominids, including humans, can’t and don’t exist and couldn’t have for the past 100,000 years.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. Just look at the heretic Christian Steve Quayle’s site for pictures and Burlington News for extensive records of findings of giant human skeletons.
11) Dinosaurs never lived with humans and couldn’t have.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. Just read the book Forbidden Archeology, made by a Hindu who believes Earth is millions or billions of years old (apparently finding out that mainstream scientists are oppressive liars wasn’t a big enough bang for him that their theories might also be oppressive lies).
12) Humans didn’t exist before 100,000 years ago and couldn’t have.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
13) Dinosaurs didn’t exist for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
14) Dinosaurs haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
15) Dragons never existed (or: Dragon’s haven’t existed for the past 100,000 years and couldn’t have.)
No evidence for this belief, much against it.
16) You can’t know if God exists unless he is a material thing that you can both see and touch and perform experiments on to see that he is God.
And why would this be true? No evidence for this belief, much against it.
17) If God exists he doesn’t care about what happens around Him.
If God doesn’t exist how could you know what his personality be like if he did?! Mainstream scientists keep replacing the God of the Bible, like pathologically mentally ill people, with a God in their own image: one who does whatever they want and thinks however they want him to: that’s not “God”, that’s a slave!
18) Reincarnation is impossible.
It’s not impossible, but there is no evidence that shows it to be true, and a lot of indirect evidence against it (some which I point out out here, the rest scattered throughout my journal which is evidence for the Bible, and the Bible contradicts reincarnation, as it says man only gets one life to live here, and then either goes to Heaven, or must face condemnation and be imprisoned in Hell).
19) Spirits don’t exist.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
20) The physiology, behavior and communicatory behavior done by animals, which include humans, can be explained by Big Bang Theory, Darwinian Evolution Theory, including why rape and why abuse of children happens.
There are so many things about animals and humans that are not just “not easily explained” but for which no explanation can even be imagined, as other evolutionists have admitted in almost the same way I just said it, that you can feel (if you’re not insane and have read the news and about evolution a lot) that whatever explanation that is come up with, would be a mere claim, and probably stupid. For example: how can behaviors done by stupid animals, like maggots, which show wisdom or rather knowledge of what another thing is thinking (like larvae disguising themselves to continue eating prey) have evolved to have such knowledge? How would a newborn thing “know” to disguise itself by random events that lead to it being what it is? Try and imagine: some chemicals come together one day and turn into a thing that replicates and attaches to other chemicals to exist for a while, and then eventually, it gets nervous system, then a brain that can make decisions about where it wants to go and eat and what to touch, then it gets the ability to smell, taste, feel by touch, see, hear, and then emotions of all kinds, then the ability to talk, then to know what other animals are thinking, and then the desire to dance, sing, collect things, make art and tools and the desire to explore and have relations with other animals and aliens. Not necessarily in that order or having all the sensory abilities, but how? No one has even come up with close to an explanation as to how such things would happen by random events so that billions of “religious fanatics” would become mainstream scientists, instead, they stay loyal to whatever God or gods they worship. So clearly, there is something about theistic religions that are convincing the majority of the world to stay theists and religious. And there are many agnostics who refuse to entirely embrace mainstreamism (which ironically sounds like “extremism”).
21) More energy can’t be produced than the energy that was needed to produce that energy (for example, zero point energy devices can’t exist).
And the evidence for this is? I’m also curious to know then how nuclear power plants can be explained: If I cause an explosion that leads to a nuclear detonation that puts out more energy than I did to make the explosion, would that violate this law? Or is all the energy I used and whatever energy was used to get me to that point taken into the equation?
22) Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity is at least 99% true, and no other theory of how the universe works therefore can replace it.
There’s much evidence against GTR and Special Relativity. For those of you who want to see it, ask, and I might show it to you if I’m in a position to, or just search the Internet.
23) Quantum Mechanical Theory is 100% true.
There’s scientists who claim to have come up with evidence that it is not true.
24) Only mainstream scientists can know if something is true or not and only through them can non-mainstream scientists and non-scientists know if something is true or not.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. It’s also used or implied against those who find evidence against mainstream science, like some fossil that a non-scientist discovered which shows Mainstream age dating to be wrong.
It’s also contradictory: if only Mainstreamers can know what is true, then how can they cause anyone else to know, who isn’t one? It’s like saying, “Only Catholics can have the Holy Spirit, and therefore you can only be a Catholic if you have the Holy Spirit.”: Then how does anyone become a Catholic in the first place? Or a better analogy: “It’s impossible for there to be any other king than God, but he can make you a king if he decides to,” which makes no sense because it’s supposed to be impossible.
25) Something is true if a consensus of mainstream scientists say it is (therefore, truth is not absolute, since they can change their minds, and therefore morality is also determined by the consensus of mainstream scientists, including whether or not rape and abusing child is good or bad).
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. If it were true than racism, discrimination against people merely over their age, rape and child abuse could be “good” and “moral”, but they obviously aren’t to those who still have still have their moral instincts regarding the right or wrongness of those things.
26) Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo, Charles Darwin, Mark Twain, Frederick Nietzsche, Carl Sagan, Bernard Shaw, Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Richard Dawkins, Mike Shermer and Michio Kaku are like gods (or the wisest men and their claims that the things in this list are true cannot be refuted).
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it. That Nietzsche committed suicide says a lot, if he was supposed to be one of the most logical and right-thinking people ever.
27) Theists who worship a person who chooses to be invisible or invisible to mainstream scientists cannot be scientists, nor can any who disbelieve any of the 21 things in this list. Stated another way: Religion isn’t compatible with science.
No evidence for this belief, mountains of obvious against it: at least 40% of the people who are employed as scientists in the world are religious, and the majority of inventions in the world, or the components (which are also inventions) that make up those inventions, are religious people. Even if it were a smaller number at this time, the fact is: most of the kinds of types inventions ever made, were made by religious people, or those living in a mostly religious environment. Rarely if ever is something new come up with these days, let alone something very useful or affordable, let alone by a mainstream scientist. Even if something is, it’s often hidden from the public or ignored by other mainstream scientists in favor of things which already exist or inferior things.
28) Disorder can produce order (for example the “Big Bang” or explosions can result in Earth with all the life in it and all the countless ordered complexity with all it’s countless types of beautiful features and emotions.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
29) Low order can produce higher order (like how disorder can produce order).
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
30) Governments can’t keep secrets for longer than 40 years.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
31) Governments have never conspired against their citizens
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
32) Governments can’t conspire against their citizens.
No evidence for this belief, mountains against it.
33) You should doubt (be skeptical of) whatever you hear and see, especially those who make claims against Mainstream Science.
Why? Why not just use “science” to see if a thing is true without making up your mind first? Why assume? Is assuming scientific? Presuming and assuming are stupid and evil and anti-scientific. To teach a child to doubt everything except mainstream science sets them up for a pathological disorder like Insanity of Doubt, a mental disorder which Mainstreamers managed to erase from the psychology field. They are even trying to get rid of narcissism as a disorder, using the excuse that “it’s common,” which is not a logical reason. Child abuse is common, that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be looked at as illogical or immoral or be seen as good even. Something also to note is that “Skeptics” in ancient times were a group of pagan truth seekers. Mainstreamers however have hijacked it and made their own dishonest version of this group. Insanity of Doubt can lead to illogical behaviors, for example not doing something which is logical because you doubt it is logical and that you will be vilified, mocked, harassed or killed for doing the right thing. Teaching people to be skeptical leads them to develop a pathological avoidance of doing what is morally correct and logical, which includes learning what is morally correct and logical, let alone being moral and logical, out of fear of the previously mentioned things and out of doubt that it is useful to learn them.
34) Anyone who disagrees with mainstream science should be ignored, or laughed at or spoken out against, verbally harassed, lied about, physically abused or murdered.
Hence why many millions have been killed in the past 100 years, since Darwin-worship began. And there’s no evidence for belief 33, and evidence against it. Hence why science has largely stagnated and why little has been advanced in propulsion and energy, and why we are stuck on this pollution-accumulating planet.
35) Less intelligent people should be discriminated against.
Hence why many millions have been killed in the past 100 years, since Darwin-worship began. And there’s no evidence for belief 33, and evidence against it. Hence the Eugenics movement and the many forced sterilizations of Americans in the past.
36) If aliens did make it to Earth they would make it their goal to first meet with the mainstream scientists and peaceful leaders of the world, like President Obama.
Mainstreamers are filled with mentally ill people, and Obama is a big business pandering warmonger, just like the former Bush presidents.
37) The climate is getting more extreme and most of the land might mostly be under water one day, therefore, stop making any carbon dioxide and spend money to do so.
But according to the implication of the Mainstreamer Science religion, we’ll evolve to live under water and some humans will be amphibous with something like gills or some other underwater breathing system, or did you forget your own “scientific” Waterworld movie? And without carbon dioxide all plants will die. If all plants die, about every other living thing would die and all the eart would be desert, mud or rock. I’d rather live under water. It’s also unlikely: With humans needing more and more water, they’d eventually begin mining ice and creating more desalinization plants, and using slave labor if they had to, unless there was something to stop them from doing so, so the water would end up in us, animals, plants, us, goods requiring water and containers, not wasted into the ocean. I bet it would be cheaper and more productive to build nuclear powerplants and nuclear powered drill machines to colonize Antarctica and Greenland and make heat radiating cities to turn the ice and snow into water than can be used for drinking, food and technology. Or is it better for them to remain under ice forever, while the warmer lands gets more expensive and more polluted? No, it’s not better.
38) There are too many humans on the planet, and there should only be allowed to be a billion or less for all time.
There’s no evidence that there are too many humans. There’s plenty of land left to grow food on and plenty of underwater land to build underwater buildings in and we can build colonies on the Moon and Mars and space stations. But the jealous, greedy, pleasure-addicted and God-hating, joy-killing, “if we can’t have fun then no one can” Mainstream Scientists are deliberately discouraging it, which is why it isn’t done, and why everyone is mislead into devoting their money and energy into living only on land, and suffering for it.
In conclusion, mainstream scientists are a willfully ignorant cult who hinder and crush other scientists and threads of other scientific fields without a logic reason, like Medical Scientists and Medical Science and Creation Scientists and Creation Science, and who endanger lives and kill people (over 260,000,000 deaths, millions of whom were unborn babies). They are part of the reason that the public doesn’t have anti-gravity or zero-point energy technology and why there is a constant increasing flow of crime and illogical behavior and increasing pathological mental disorders like narcissism, sociopathism, and psychopathism. Those who support mainstream scientists or their bad logic and propaganda are also part of the reason that these things have happened and are still happening. They are part of the reason that many cures for sicknesses and diseases are suppressed, lost or no longer known about. They are part of the reason millions of children are suffering in the USA and a billion more outside of America. They are part the reason the world is in poverty. The people who fund them are also part of the reason, and the leaders over them, and the leader of them, which is Satan.
They are deliberately ignorant of and fight against and shun the facts, including what correct morality is (obedience to whatever laws Jesus said are still to be obeyed) when they see it. Therefore, they should be fought against and shunned and not be given any funding. They are a hypocritical, deceptive, misleading, body-destroying, parasitic cult just like Karl Marx cults, Scientology, Raeleanism and other UFO cults. Those who are against Mainstreamers should set up their own.
Note: Michio and Einstein are not atheists, nor do they fit perfectly into Maintream Scientism because of this, though the Mainstream Media, who have the same leaders as the MS’s, try to spin them as being Mainstreamers. Spinoza, who some might consider one of the gods of Mainstreamers, also was not an atheist. All three believe God caused and directed the formation of the universe. Michio speaks through Einstein to let the world know this, and to keep his job and Mainstreamers from harassing him. I also have not said that all Mainstreamers are equally bad, and hate God so much that they can feel that hatred. Some hate him, but don’t think about him, and so their hatred is like someone who hates a person that they don’t think about.
These are a list of prominent scientists who are either haven’t conformed to the Mainstream Science or who are not promoters of atheism (which is done by the most hardened Mainstreamers), but who haven’t been rejected by them (probably because these scientists have so much credentials and credibility with the masses that to do so would causes mainstream scientists to be seen for what they really are: an extremist anti-God cult, and then rejected by most people):
Arthur C. Clark (whose faith wavered about God’s existence and who wouldn’t mock those who weren’t Mainstreamers, at least not in an obvious way)
Albert Einstein (a deist creationist, whose “scientific” theory was unfortunately has been a great hindrance to science and religion, and one of the greatest next to Darwinian Evolutionary Theory and Freudian Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy)
Michio Kaku (who said on Coast to Coats AM, “the Bible is a scientific book”)
William R. Corliss (who points out how evolutionists ignore “ooparts” and make absurd reasons for it)
Maurice Allais
Stanton Friedman (who points out the absurd reasons Mainstreamers use to explain away the significance of UFOs)
Stephen Hawking (a prominent handicapped physicist who is against atheism, though still panders to atheists)
Thomas Edison (a creationist, but was also a schemer with little conscience)
Dr. Andrew Wakefield (a British former surgeon and medical researcher known for his independant exposure of the causative connection between the measles, mumps and the rubella (MMR) vaccine, autism and autistic enterocolitis. The hypocrite Mainstream Science Cult, atheist, liberal, frauds of Wikipedia and Conservapedia libel him as being a fraud based on a fraudulent news report from the Sunday Times reporter Brian Deer and the British General Medical Council (more Mainstreamers)).
Dr. Paul Connett (a Professor of Chemistry at St. Lawrence University who is an anti-fluoride activist who protests against the fluoridated public water supplies being forced on the public)
Michael Behe (a famous scientists whose book Darwin’s Black Box caused a huge controversy when it showed flaws in Darwinian beliefs)
Here is a huge list of scientists who are opposed to the physics knowledge filter caused by the Big Bang Propgandists: http://www.cosmologystatement.org
Martin Fleischmann ()
Dr. Stanley Pons ()
Bockris
Dr. Claude Allegre (“a top geophysicist and French Socialist who has authored more than 100 scientific articles and written 11 books and received numerous scientific awards including the Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical Society of the United States, converted from climate alarmist to skeptic in 2006”)
Bruno Wiskel (a geologist “of the University of Alberta recently reversed his view of man-made climate change and instead became a global warming skeptic. Wiskel was once such a big believer in man-made global warming that he set out to build a “Kyoto house” in honor of the UN sanctioned Kyoto Protocol which was signed in 1997”)
Here is a huge list of scientists opposed to the knowledge filter caused by Global Warming Propagandists:
There is also a famous writer, science educator, teacher, and philosopher named Loren Eiseley, who is not rejected by Mainstream Scientists, and he exposed Darwin as a credit thief who took most of his evolution theory from others, and changed it (by removing God) and adding that animals could turn into other animals or new kinds of animals (“species” was the word he used for “kind”, but confusingly it can also mean “type” and the word continues to be used ambiguously by Mainstreamers to this day).
Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called “consensus” on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.
The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007.
Even some in the establishment media now appear to be taking notice of the growing number of skeptical scientists. In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics “appear to be expanding rather than shrinking.” Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears “bite the dust.” (LINK) In addition, many scientists who are also progressive environmentalists believe climate fear promotion has “co-opted” the green movement. (LINK)
This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate.
Many of the scientists featured in this report consistently stated that numerous colleagues shared their views, but they will not speak out publicly for fear of retribution. Atmospheric scientist Dr. Nathan Paldor, Professor of Dynamical Meteorology and Physical Oceanography at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, author of almost 70 peer-reviewed studies, explains how many of his fellow scientists have been intimidated.
“Many of my colleagues with whom I spoke share these views and report on their inability to publish their skepticism in the scientific or public media,” Paldor wrote. – Source
How to Get to Heaven 