Posts Tagged ‘creationists’

A Russian Cryptid? – On Rare Lake Creatures (‘Monsters’, ‘Serpents’, ‘Water Horses’, ‘Beasts’)

October 23, 2019 Leave a comment


I was curious about a certain lake “monster”, what some might call a sea dinosaur, maybe in ignorance, that supposedly lives in Lake Ouich, as I saw video of what might be it on the show “Strange Evidence”, but there was nearly no info about it, not even mention of the video. But one or more websites mention a Lake Lochy which has an alternate name too. There was interesting info about a sea creature that lived there, mentioned in the 1830s in a book I found through Google’s book archives, I suppose may be a legend hundreds of years old, but reasonably from the the 1800s. I discovered, no surprise to me, that Lake Lochy and other Lochs (lakes in Ireland) that have accounts of large mysterious creatures in them are all connected to Loch Ness. It’s obviously some ecosystem God has preserved for these species of monsters, something to strengthen the faith of Christians and frustrate the faithlessness of skeptics/doubters, atheists, and anti-creationists. The earliest account I could find on a large Lake Lochy creature referred to it as a ‘water horse’. There’s even a modern news article documentimg the find of a government official who found a headless amd tailless skeleton of what might have been this creature, or of some connected loch. My research lead me to a book of news for the year 1859 that mentioned Lake Lochy and other connected ones and then in the next short article, perhaps coincidentally mentions a sighting by a “Captain John Dunn”, who saw an unknown water creature at “59.14 lattitude north” by “59.10 longitude west”, a frustrating way of giving the location as Google did not show any websites that allowed me to find where this was by typing in those numbers, and one website required me to put in the city of the coordinates first (why?! how stupid!). I ended up, perhaps on the same site having to manually move and tap my finger on a tiny map and on my little phone which ended up with the page repeatedly going to some other site due to Android’s stupid programming and the website’s failure to ask if I wanted to leave the page. When I tried to go back to the page and did it would always reset the map location, so then I tried it on my tablet which was a little easier and eventually pinpointed a length of water with a very small width it seemed which almost exactly fit the coordinates. There were no very nearby lakes or even ponds, but some large lake was connected to this stream some miles away, but is in Russian, so, I couldn’t read it in English. If anyone can translate the names of that lake and the cities or towns nearby as shown in the screenshots with this article I’ve written, please do. Please also translate the name of the stream where the creature was sighted, obviously using the comment function here on this webpage.

My guess is that the streams were once much larger, but thar rerouting the water to what appears to be various farms all around it caused it to not just greatly dwindle but move a little so that there is no longer water at the place the creature was seen. The creature or creatures probably resides in the large lake miles away now. If any Russians or tourists have seen unknown creatures in that lake or the streams please leave detailed comments on this article about what you saw, including the time, day, month, year or season of your sighting and if you were drunk or high or your eyes blurry or clear and distance you saw the creature or creatures at.

I’d also appreciate other comments about your personal sightings if any of unknown Russian lake dragons/serpents/dinos/water horses/water dogs or however it looked to you. Perhaps you’ve seen a creature not even mentioned before in history. And if you’ve seen a dinosaur or dragon on land, let readers here know the details and time.

A Test: 66 Questions for Philosophers, Mathematicians, Agnostics, Atheists and Evolutionists

August 9, 2012 3 comments

Note: this is copyrighted, and use of it for profit, for example, in a sermon or employment application, advertisement, written material for sale or any other items, including clothing, requires the permission of the copyright holder.

“For the most divine knowledge is… most worthy of honor. … other sciences… are more necessary than [theology,] but none more excellent… For by theology you may find reason to continue living and even obtain eternal peace.” Said by Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher, over 321 years before the giving of eternal life, Christ, was born into a human body.

Aristotle was wrong. Knowing and understanding God is the most important thing, because, as he said, it is necessary for achieving eternal peace. “Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” “It is the spirit that quickens; the flesh profits nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.” – Yeshua, Christ

The Questions:

1) The emotional system (spiritual heart). How many types of emotions can a human feel? Where are the emotions being felt, what location? Do emotions have a color, smell, and can they be felt or directly seen? What is the maximum emotional intensity a person can feel without becoming insane? What causes emotions? Why do humans or animals have desires? Why aren’t humans non-emotional, and simply like programs in an unemotional machine? How is the mind able to be connected to the heart? What caused this connection? What caused self-awareness? What caused the connection of the mind to the brain? Why do humans have different types of personalities? Why do humans interact with happiness, anger or dislike for each other? Why do they have concern of any kind for anything at all, why are they curious about anything?
2) The mental system (mind). What is the cause of human thoughts? Why does a mind think, reason? Where is the will located? Why do humans have a will, rather than simply a program like a computer with no will, that needs to be directly made to do something to perform another function? How did the human mind obtain the ability to create thoughts in the human brain and move muscles by willing/wishing to do so? Is this some sort of psychokinesis? How is the mind able to reproduce sounds and other sensations it’s heard? What caused this ability? How is the heart able to be connected to the mind? What caused this connection? What caused the connection of the heart to the rest of the body’s sensory system and how is it connected to it? Why do all living things, when repeatedly harmed, tend towards an insane/chaotic/disordered/illogical way of life, except humans, which need a guide and training to live a religious/ordered/logical of life and?
3) The neurological system (brain, including spinal cord). How fast is the human brain? How fast is the human brain? How fast are individual brain cells/neurons? What is its maximum memory capacity? How fast can it store a memory? How many neurons does the average adult have? How many functions does the human brain have. Can a brain grow new brain cells? How many regulatory functions (how many systems in the human body) does the brain monitor and control and how complex is this task and how many neurons does it require for the brain to do so? How is the mind able to reproduce sounds and other sensations it’s heard? What caused this ability? Why don’t damage brain cells regenerate faster?
4) The digestive system. Is it simple or complex? How complex is it? How many types of food can be digested?
5) The lingual system. Where did language come from? How many languages can a person speak, how many types of tastes can the tongue taste, and how much heat can the human mouth withstand without being burned, or coldness, without being damaged? And how many types of chemicals can be put in the mouth, and at what level, without it being damaged, or beyond the point of healing, for example, pepper and toxic wastes from various types of bacteria?
6) The optical system (eyes). How many colors can the eye see, and how many mega pixels? How close and far away can optimal eyes see? How many different color combinations do eyes come in? What is the maximum amount of light a human eye can withstand without being damaged?
7) The nasal system (nose). How many smells are discernable? A small simple number? And how is it possible?
8) The touch system (skin and nerves), including sensations from body hairs, which also makes possible the euphoric feeling of feeling fine hair brush against skin and sexual contact.
9) The auditory system (ears). What is the frequency rance of hearing?
10) The nervous system (nerves, including spinal cord). How many nerves does the average human body have, and how many types of sensations can it feel, and to how many organs does it connect to and how fast can a nerve respond to a sensation?
11) The immune system. How are immune cells know how to defend themselves? Why do immune cells not attack each other, helpful bacteria, or the body they are within, or anything? Why do immune cells only attack specific things? Why is it never beneficial for an immune cell to mutate if mutations are what caused immune cells to reach their level of complexity and abilities to defend themselves and the human body against countless types of bacteria and non-living chemicals and be at peace with countless other types of chemicals? How did immune cells get their ability to communicate with each other and other cells?
12) The cardiovascular system (lungs, throat, nasal passage). How many functions are performed by this system and how complex is it compared to that of the simplest known life form?
13) The gastrointestinal system (gall bladder, pancreas, intestines). What are the functions of this system? How complex is this system, it’s total number of functions?
14) The circulatory system. What are the functions of this system? How complex is this system, it’s total number of functions?
15) The skeletal-musculatory system (bones and cartilage). How many bones are in the human body? How many muscles are in the human body? How complex is this system? How many bones does a human have? Why does the body reduce it’s number of bones over time? Why and how does the body know to reduce the number of bones in its body? Why isn’t the human body armored? Why aren’t human skeletons made of titanium or some other extremely strong and light metal? Why doesn’t the human skeletal system regenerate faster? How many total muscles are there in the human body? What is required for a human to balance itself when standing and what amount of programming is necessary for it to be able to walk and to run and to do so while turning its head from side to side or up and down or even with its eyes closed?
16) The hair texture, coloration and pattern. Why do humans have different varieties of hair types? How many different shades of human hair are there? Why is there curly, wavy and straight human hair rather than just one type? How long can human hair grow? What are the total number of functions of human hair? Why is scalp hair different from eyebrow hairs, mouth and chin and pubic hairs, why isn’t there just one type of hair texture? How many different texture types of human hair are there? What are the total number of human hair patterns, why do some humans have different hair covering patterns?
17) How many types of laws of physics does the human body operate by to function?
18) The sleep cycle. Why do humans sleep? What is the average length of time a human sleeps, and why? How did the human body get the ability to continue breathing, moving to keep from blood clotting and suffocation and keep from going to the bathroom, while sleeping, and ability to cease when a person needs to urinate or defecate?
19) The life cycle. Why do humans live on average 70 to 80 years, and at most 250 years? Why don’t humans live indefinitely or even longer, like turtles, alligators, crocodiles, Redwood and Joshua trees and other long-lived trees?
20) The human genetic system (genes, DNA and RNA). How complex is the human genetic system? How many total functions does the human genetic program contain? How does DNA and RNA cause certain molecules to form structures, or entire humans or perform tasks? What caused DNA to form?
21) The human reproductive system. Why are there male and female humans as opposed to non-sexual humans? How many functions do the reproductive systems have? How complex are the female and male human reproductive systems? Why does it take many months for a human to be born?
22) Why don’t human body parts regenerate faster and why only finger and toe tips and other small amounts of skin and muscle parts? Why does it regrow scar tissue instead of the former tissue?
23) Why are some living things born self-sufficient, like ants, bees, caterpillars, spiders, beetles, worms, bacteria, fungi, mushrooms, crabs after hatching, not needing a guide or training, and others needing them, like humans, apes, monkeys, dolphins, whales, birds, dogs, rodents, cats, scorpions, some crabs, elephants, rhinos, giraffes, pigs, cattle, goats and sheep? How do animals that require milk to feed know to suck on a teet for milk, or a baby human on a nipple for milk? How do animals know what to eat and drink? Why do animals run, hide, attack, pretend to be dead or stay still to avoid danger, even when very young? How did they learn to do these things? Why do most animals protect their eggs and angrily if they sense the eggs are in danger? Why do some animals show concern for each other, and others not? Why do some animals get along with other kinds of animals, and others not?
24) How many functions are there in Earth’s ecosystem? How complex is Earth’s ecosystem?
25) The second heaven: How many stars are there? How many planets are there? How many galaxies are there? How many stars far outside of galaxies exist? How many types of stars exist? How many types of planets are there? How many known physical universes are there?
26) What difference would it make if there was one galaxy containing all the stars, planets and comets in the universe, rather than none, and if no star or planet or comet ever diminished, or collided?
27) How many physical laws are there? How complex are all of these laws together, or what is the total amount of information of all of the known laws? How many letters or words would it take to list all of the laws and the total number of ways in which they affect other things?
28) What is science? Can science teach anyone anything?
29) What is religion? Can religion teach anyone anything?
30) What is a human? Can a human teach anyone anything?
31) What is an animal? Can an animal teach anyone anything?
32) What is the Bible? How many books are in the Bible? How many words are in the Bible? How many laws are in the Bible? What are the main laws of the Bible? How many events are in the Bible? When was the Bible written? How many different people are mentioned in the Bible? How many countries are named in the Bible? How many cities are named in the Bible? How many races are named in the Bible? How many languages are mentioned in the Bible? How many concepts are there mentioned in the Bible? How many emotions are mentioned in the Bible? Does the Bible say anywhere to reason? Does the Bible say anywhere to make judgments? Does the Bible mention anything similar to the scientific method? Does the Bible say anywhere to not assume things? Does the Bible anywhere say to take disobedience to God seriously? Does the Bible anywhere say not to take disobedience against God seriously? How seriously does the Bible say to take disobedience against God? What are three other words the Bible uses to describe disobedience to God?
33) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if there Bible was never written, besides people merely not knowing what the Bible was?
34) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if no one ever said what was true, besides that they always lied?
35) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if no one believed in any spiritual or alien being with the ability to imprison or kill any animal or human, besides that no one would believe in such beings?
36) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if no one ever made a judgment? Do you need to know the scientific method or perform it to know what would happen if no one ever made judgments?
37) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if if no one ever pointed out whenever someone lied, stole, murdered, showed hatred towards another person for an unjust reason, or never obeyed their parents?
38) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if everyone believed they were merely an animal, besides that everyone believed they were an animal, and not human?
39) Can you show, even by the scientific method, whether or not an animal is more important than a human, or if any living thing is more important than another? How do you measure “importance”?
40) Can you give twenty historical and twenty everyday examples of what most people would consider evil when humans believe they are merely animals and not beings who are responsible to a god or God?
41) Can you give twenty historical and twenty everyday examples of what most people would consider good when humans believe they are merely animals and not beings who are responsible to a god or God?
42) Can you give twenty historical and twenty everyday examples of what most people would consider good when humans believe they are responsible to a pagan god, including “Allah” and the Yahweh said to have only written the Old Testament?
43) Can you give twenty historical and twenty everyday examples of what most people would consider good when humans believe they are responsible to the Yahweh said to have written the Bible through humans?
44) What is a Catholic? How are they different from Calvinists?
45) Do you know the definition of all of what are commonly called “the major religions of the world” and the alleged origins of and a short history of each?
46) Do you know who the top 50 scientists of the world were, and what their religion or “way of life” was or that of their parents or ancestors?
47) Do you know who the inventor of the pyramid was, when and how all the known pyramids were built, how long it took to make the ones that still stand and what their functions were, or who made the first magnifying glass, microscope, telescope, hot air balloon, blimp, steam engine, gasoline engine, electric motor, modern battery, calculator, telephone, radio, light bulb, airplane, car, bicycle, motorcycle, skateboard, refrigerator, tape recorder, television, computer and satellite were, or of their parents or ancestors?
48) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what difference it would make if everyone believed that Earth was not the center of the universe or not?
49) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what difference it would make if everyone believed in Relativity?
50) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what difference it would make if everyone believed in abiogenesis?
51) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what difference it would make if everyone believed evolution?
52) How many generations of creatures would it take
53) How do you define beneficial, good and evil and why?
54) Is your definition of beneficial, good and evil the same as everyone of every culture, religion, philosophy, city or country?
55) What is the definition of “proof”?
56) What is the definition of “evidence”?
57) What is the definition of “fact”?
58) What is the definition of “truth”?
59) What is the definition of “transitional fossil”?
60) Did you realize how unfathomably complex this universe and the living things in it were? Do you know? How much more do you understand and why should I care? How much do you really know and understand, you who don’t believe in God, who believes the universe was always here, or came from an explosion, and that living things formed without intent and that at least one living thing turned into humans? Do you know and understand as much as you thought you did after reading these questions?
61) Are you my God? If you don’t believe in a god or God, should you tell me right from wrong or command me to do anything?
62) Is there any point in loving anything or getting angry at anything or being curious about anything?
63) What is “circular reasoning” and can you give examples of it?

Three more questions:

64) If evolution truly happened, than how many generations of creatures would it take, starting with the first ancestor of humans, and how long, to evolve into us unfathomably complex humans, along with our differing reproductive organs? Would it take a hundred years? A thousand? 10,000? 100,000? 1 million? 2 million? 50 million? 100 million? 500 million? 1 billion? 5 billion? 10 billion? 14.7 billion years? Think about how long it would take for everything to work out to get to us.

65) If there are no transitional fossils, due to Earth repeatedly having massive changes to its land and ocean scape, why are there many so called “living fossils” which haven’t changed from billions to millions of years? Examples: the giant triops, which the evolutionists at Wikipedia, headed by an atheist, deliberately erased from their triops article, even though a video of it was clearly shown and seen by hundreds of thousands of people? Did billions of people have to see it for it to be admitted what it was to be acceptable to the evolutionist, liberal, anti-Christian, narcissist atheists and greedy businessman who control Wikipedia? And that’s just one of many “living fossils”, which obviously aren’t living fossils, because there obviously is no such thing as evolution. It’s a made up story, believed or used by the bitter, the prideful, and cultists, like Mainstream Scientologists.

Would you like more questions to think about?

66) Animal behavior: Why do nearly blind scorpions, when repeatedly disturbed and not knowing where the location is of what disturbed it, stand tall while walking with their tails raised tall? Are they, which are nearly blind, thinking, “I will scare others with my height and the with the stinger and the poison in my stinger. I will cause them pain or kill them and eat them if they are small enough”? What’s your answer? How do birds know to keep their eggs warm, and at a certain temperature? Did other birds tell them, “It must kept at this amount of warmth, don’t let it get colder than this temperature”? So, who would you say is stupid and delusional? Who would you say is blind and hypocritical Who would you say is, “intellectually dishonest,” whatever that’s supposed to mean? Who would you say doesn’t think for themselves?

The 2 Peter 3 Prophecy

3 Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. 4 They will say, “Where is this ‘coming’ he promised? Ever since our ancestors died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation.” 5 But they deliberately forget that long ago by God’s word the heavens came into being and the earth was formed out of water and by water. 6 By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. 7 By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly. – NIV

The Romans 1 Prophecy:

18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator – NIV

The Prophecy Jeremiah Spoke to the Jews,
Concerning Their Punishment

This is what the Lord says:
“Stand at the crossroads and look;
ask for the ancient paths,
ask where the good way is,
and walk in it,
and you will find rest for your souls.
But you said, ‘We will not walk in it.’
I appointed watchmen over you and said,
‘Listen to the sound of the trumpet!’
But you said, ‘We will not listen.’
Therefore hear, you nations;
you who are witnesses,
observe what will happen to them.
Hear, you earth:
I am bringing disaster on this people,
the fruit of their schemes,
because they have not listened to my words
and have rejected my law.

What do I care about incense from Sheba
or sweet calamus from a distant land?
Your burnt offerings are not acceptable;
your sacrifices do not please me.”
Therefore this is what the Lord says:
“I will put obstacles before this people.
Parents and children alike will stumble over them;
neighbors and friends will perish.

Related Article
The Mathematical Impossibility Of Evolution

Categories: agnosticism, atheism, creationism, evolution, ID theory, Inflation Theory Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Evolutionist Fantasies – Logical Fallacies Made by Evolutionists

June 19, 2011 4 comments

Post link:

Yesterday, on Coast to Coast AM, “Ian Punnett was joined by psychology professor Douglas Kenrick for a discussion on how the primitive, animalistic underside of human nature, with its sexual fantasies and homicidal tendencies, has actually given rise to the most positive features of our race.” I listened to this show and found it interesting that this professor said that those who were exclusively homosexual were “a puzzle” to evolutionists, because it didn’t help to spread their genes. He made a one or two other nonsensical statements like this, which evolutionists often repeat, which is that “genes want to spread” / “copy themselves”. They do this so often without explaining further what they mean, that such insane-talk can be taken literally. Evolutionists literally believe that animals “desire to spread their genes”, as if that that is what they are thinking when they are “in heat” or trying to mate, and are literally “looking for a mate with good genes” or “the best genes”. It’s absolutely stupid to say such things. Animals obviously are not intelligent to think such things, and how much less would genes have thoughts and desires? And back to the homosexuality “puzzle” which he seemed to imply must have some usefulness; says who? Why would it have usefulness in evolution? Why can’t something be a non-useful trait in evolution? Douglas said himself that exclusive homosexuality is an irrational choice, and yet he insisted that it must have some usefulness that couldn’t be seen (a clear contradiction). Is he biased? Is he double-minded because he is pandering to the homosexuals “community” and the liberals that determine his pay or whether he gets paid or not? Why doesn’t he just say, “It’s an aberration that repeatedly gets eliminated like evolution, like a harmful genetic mutation”. He also said that, “It’s not like homosexuality is a choice”, which was evidence of his bias. Who says it’s not a choice and where is the evidence? There are homosexuals who have said that it is a choice. There are also former homosexuals. Sexual attraction is also something that develops over time; people’s tastes change. And who would argue that babies are born being sexually attracted to anything? Are babies also born in the act of theft? This claim that babies can be born gay and is why they are gay or bisexual seems to be tied in to the illogical belief and excuse that God made sinners. For example, it’s common for ignorant and confused people to blame God for themselves being corrupt, asking, “Why did God make people sinful?” or “Why did God make me gay?” That’s as nonsensical as asking, “Why did God ecreat me in the act of stealing a car?”; no one is created in the act of stealing, lying, murdering, having sexual thoughts or committing adultery, married to anyone, or born a “Jew” (“Jew” and “Jewish” are racial words which are often incorrectly used in place of “Judaism”) or Christian. And a side note: The “Free Will” Christians who often make these claims of God making them the way they are (in the act of doing something including lusting to do certain evil things) are contradicting their claim that they have a completely free will which God isn’t allowed to and doesn’t “mess with”.

Also, does evolution also have desires and want to perpetuate itself? Yet so called “scientists” like Professor Douglas and others who believe in evolution, especially evolution-scientists, keep making the clear logical fallacy of giving emotions to dna and genes, and another fallacy, which is giving animals (and they consider humans to also be animals) false motives. It’s also bizarre that they give animals and their “genes” and dna the same motives, as if the dna and genes that exist in the animal they are in have separate minds of their own and are not apart of one being (creature). Even if they are speaking figuratively, it is a bad form of teaching to repeatedly do this (as bad as the nonsensical cliches “science tells us” and “science says”) and not explain what you mean, and to keep doing that leads to the ones you saying it to, believing such fallacies and to their own hurt, leading them to Hell because of believing such stupid and illogical things. It may be that certain evolution-scientists used this stupid talk to make it easier for kids and “stupid people” to understand, and got into the bad habit of repeatedly explaining things this way, and/or that certain ones with bad intent, noticed that by saying “dna is programmed to replicate”, which some evolutionists will admit, gives the correct implication that it was intelligently programmed (because mindless things like evolution and so called “nature” do not program things, and obviously dna didn’t create or program itself), and in their hatred of God and the Bible, didn’t and don’t want anyone to know or believe the truth, which is that we were created by God and that the laws of universe, including our biology, were made by him.

Categories: creation science, creationism, evolution propaganda, Evolutionist Education, evolutionist morality, Intelligent Design vs Darwinian Evolution Theory Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Darwinist and Liberal ‘Integrity’ Torched by ClimateGate

November 30, 2009 Leave a comment

Has anyone noticed how Darwinists were the ones who were mainly promoting and worrying over global warming, and that it was the opposite in the case of Creationists?:

And now, it’s recently been found that the some of the top global warming scientists, all Darwinists, had been lying about there being a global warming trend, and that Earth had actually been cooling, possibly about to enter another ice age even (on the ice age site is a link to a book being sold which goes along with the false claim that Earth is billions of years old, and that animals suddenly evolved new useful features or into other animals because of magnetic reversals, but obviously magnets don’t cause people to grow wings or tails).

One notorious psuedo-scientist, a trolling idiot, claimed that it wasn’t true that Darwinists were the ones always promoting global warming when a notorious plagiarist atheist and wannabe-wise woman noticed the same thing months ago, claiming, “Not true” because oil companies were denying global warming. So a few oil companies are the majority of Darwinists? There are so many millions of Darwinists oil companies that other atheists not apart of any oil companies or any company at all are just a small minority? And how can oil companies deliberately lying (lying in their own minds) count as people who sincerely deny the truth, if, again, they “knew” they were lying? How absurd and stupid atheists are, especially Darwinist ones.

On top of that, Mr. “Not True” Atheist was lying about all oil companies denying global warming, though in my judgment in his ignorance being that he busies himself trolling Christian creationists, desperately and frantically posting mere claims without evidence to defend anti-Christian doctrine, like he did in this case, rather than carefully researching.

Here’s another passage, 2 years older than Mr. Not True’s lie, which refutes it,

And just a few words later, months before the Prison Planet article, this Businessweek article then says,

There’s a maddening grammatical error in the top part of that article by the way.

So, Psuedo Christian Science Monitorers, who seven months ago mocked Christians and those who believed in Intelligent Design scientists over their disbelief of global warmin, lumping them in with astrologers, and who continues to mock them, clearly, the jokers, are you, the evil type: mockers. Not April fools, you liberal fools.

Michio Kaku: The Blind Physicist Who Elected Himself Spokesperson for All Scientists

May 16, 2009 2 comments

“when you ask where physical law comes from, then you run into big problems” – Michio Kaku, December 18, 2002

“when someone asks us where string theory came from, at that point we just throw up our hands, we don’t know” – Michio Kaku, December 18, 2002

You don’t speak for all scientists Mich, and it was hateful for you to claim that creation scientist Christians say that they don’t know where the physical laws of the universe came from. Disorder doesn’t lead to order, and as you yourself said, on December 18, 2002, the chance of life coming about on its own is near to zero, which is a lie, since life can only come about from order, not disorder, so it is not near to zero, it is zero.

Update 4/15/2011:

Other Information on Michio’s Character

I found more info about Michio’s character some days ago, but because my laptop doesn’t have enough memory to handle what I do to it, I’ve delayed posting this info for a long while. But this is what I found on Mainstream Scientist Peter Woit’s blog:

A commenter points out that on [Michio’s] MySpace site [Michio] has posted a copy of a forthcoming article by him that is supposed to appear in New Scientist. It is about the controversy over string theory, but doesn’t at all deal with the criticisms of the theory contained in my book and Smolin’s. It does contain a thoroughly dishonest paragraph about me, misrepresenting my position at Columbia (Kaku is well aware than I am a faculty member and teach graduate courses here, as well as administering the department computer system), and describing me as a “former particle physicist” (he’s well aware I have recently written a book on the subject of particle physics and continue to conduct research on the subject; then again, many people consider him to be a “former particle physicist”). He ascribes my criticism of string theory to jealousy over having been turned down for tenured positions at prestigious universities in favor of string theorists, and misquotes something I wrote about string theory:

String theory has only a “poetic relationship” to reality.

I never have said or written anything like this.

More here

Related article: What Does Michio Kaku Believe?

Yet Another Bigot Atheist Who Thinks His Mere Claims With Boasting and Mocking Is Scientific Proof

December 17, 2008 Leave a comment

Here is one of many false reviews (with my replies) on against a creationist book (the amazon CEO and his company moderators are fine with false and slanderous attacks against Christians) on  the book Of Pandas and People

(5 Stars [Which moron Tony and other atheist morons like himself gave the book in order to trick people into reading their review) 64 of 190 people found the following review helpful: Truth is finally revealed!, September 26, 2005 By Tony P. Konig "K-Tone"

"That silly fossil record has all the scientists fooled."

1. Not the creationist scientists.

2. Why did you stereotype all scientists as not being creationists? Do you know what lying is? Do you know what evidence is? Because evidence are not insults. Did you notice that the authors of this book were biologists, scientists, unlike you, moron? So then if scientists are the ones who are always right, according to your mind, why then are you slandering them? Contradict yourself much? Hence you reveal what a biased person you are. Would you believe evolutionist scientists then, gullible one who believes whatever matches his feelings? Testing 1 2 3, testing:

textbook discussions of ancestral descent are "a festering mass of unsupported assertions." – John Bonner, a biologist at Princeton

"Fossils are a great embarrassment to Evolutionary theory and offer strong support for the concept of Creation." – Dr. Gary Parker, Ph.D., Biologist AND paleontologist AND textbook author AND FORMER Evolutionist)

Still there with your fairytale "only evolutionists are scientists" belief?

3. What is your evidence the fossil record conforms to Darwinian theory? Oh, let me guess, you believed the little quotes and pictures in your 3rd grade biology class, and after having heard the propaganda lines like, "the fossil record proves evolution" repeated to you over and over, decided that it just must be true. No wait, you saw a cartoon, no wait, you watched a movie on the Discovery Channel in 3D! And you know when it’s 3D it just must be true! No wait you saw a "paleontologist" with an Indiana Jones hat on whining about how the fossil record is "tantalizingly" incomplete (and that supports evolution how moron?) Dummy says what? "But ‘tantalizing is a big word, sir, and people who use big words, especially who say they are paleontologists and go to a important-sounding university, must be right." Why then moron don’t you believe the scientist from Princeton, who admits secular biology books are filled with assumptions? Say what? "Well, cuz I didn’t see him in a neat 3D cartoon animation on the Discovery Channel, and not with a Indiana Jones hat on either, I loves those hats, it’s my favorite hat." Ok scoffer, but moving on to the rest of your "scientific" analysis:

4. Did you bother to read about and look at the evidence (which dummies like yourself hide by babbling dumb ignorance and never bothering to listen carefully but rather obsess on your feelings, awww, your feelings, how scientific). Hint super dummy: Answers In Genesis or Forbidden Archeology. Read super moron, read. And look at the pictures too, we know you like pictures. Don’t you just demonstrate how good you are are listening with your rant, but not replying to what’s in the book, but making dumb insults in ignorance? No, so read moron, read, read things other than your own reviews, based on your dumb assumptions in rehashed years old defeated "proof".

"Don’t they get it? God is messing with our heads."

Moron, don’t blame God for your mistakes made due to you following your heart rather than being careful in what you believe. Don’t blame God, you moron, when you make mistakes due to you assuming things, and believing what merely seems right, than what is right. But it is true, that he controls your heart, and does not want all to be saved, hence why you, a moron, may be a moron forever:

"[God] has blinded their eyes and deadened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts, nor turn" – John 12:40

And he also uses Satan to accomplish this:

The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. – 2 Corinthians 4:4

"He wants to challenge us to really have faith by putting something so believable in front of your eyes that it can not be denied…"

Like this super moron?:

Awwww: was a supernaturally made image of Jesus upon his resurrection, as recorded by the archaeologically proven (not proven to morons like you who suffer from mental-laziness, delusions of grandeur, and skepticemia however) Bible? How about this Mr. Fossil Record Proves My Scientific Feelings True:

I like how that fossilized tree trunk is sticking like a middle finger up at you right up through those millions of years old strata layers. Oh but wait let me guess, "It’s just an illusion! Satan put it there!" : )

On and where’s the roots? I wonder why they are gone… hint hint, hit hard by the flood waters you. Oh and by the way, those TRUNKS (not that one wasn’t sufficient evidence to refute scoffers like yourself) are in Germany and there are a forest of them in Yellowstone too.

Can you tell us how these fossils fit in to your oh so obvious logical progression of fossils?:

Oh you didn’t know about those? G I wonder why. Not. Moron what made you think all scientists are honest and that CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS JUST HAPPENED TO BE THE DISHONEST ONES, YOU MORON? CAN EXPLAIN THAT BIAS YOU IDIOT? Don’t ya know creation scientists are in the habit of sabotaging fellow creation scientists to get grant money and to get teaching positions in universities like evolutionist scientists are known for doing by many morons (but apparently not by ignorant morons like yourself). Can you really blame your being fooled on their propaganda and them hiding the truth so that they can become famous and make money and not have to hear about that oh so "unfun" Bible? Can you really blame them for you not taking a few seconds to ponder if evolutionist scientists were perfect or not, and why they might not be? CLAIMING TO BE A SCIENTIST AND PRACTICING "SCIENCE" OR EVEN DOING SO MOST OF YOUR LIFE WILL NOT MAKE YOU A MORAL PERSON IDIOT, ANYONE CAN DO SCIENCE AND DENY THE RESULTS. BIG MASSIVE DUH. I MEAN YOU’RE ONLY ACCUSING MILLIONS OF CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS AND CHRISTIANS PRACTICING SCIENCE OF DOING THE SAME, SO HOW DID THAT SLIP PAST YOU IDIOT? FULL OF BITTER HATE MUCH?

"and then contradicting it with the book he gave mankind."

Oh yes you moron, don’t you know the Bible you don’t read, let alone carefully, says, "Animals evolved." DON’T YOU KNOW?

"The point God is making is that science should be denied"


HYPOTHESIS: DOES GOD HAVE THE ABILITY TO ACCOMPLISH THINGS SUPERNATURALLY AND AM I TALKING TO GOD?: Gideon said to God, "If you will save Israel by my hand as you have promised"

FIRST TEST: "’look, I will place a wool fleece on the threshing floor. If there is dew only on the fleece and all the ground is dry, then I will know that you will save Israel by my hand, as you said.’ And that is what happened. Gideon rose early the next day; he squeezed the fleece and wrung out the dew—a bowlful of water.

REPEAT THE TEST: "Then Gideon said to God, ‘Do not be angry with me. Let me make just one more request. Allow me one more test with the fleece. This time make the fleece dry and the ground covered with dew." That night God did so. Only the fleece was dry; all the ground was covered with dew.

So what were you saying ignorant psuedoscientist false wise man, scoffer?

"regardless of how much sense it makes"

Speaking for the world again, which is hardly all atheists, and contains 60+ million Calvinists who know you’re wrong?

"because our fate depends on it."

Yeah, you really needed to add that part, that just made so much to include in your rant.

"Faith trumps logic for most people in the world."

Your’re so right, and that must then include you moron, and the rest of the world who believes in evolution, which doesn’t include Calvinists, the minority. Thank you, moron, for contradicting yourself again. Let’s have another example of that baseless faith (hint hint… faith doesn’t mean "illogical" definition-impaired moron) that you fully admit the world often has in place of logic:

So what was that your moron evolutionist friends said, jokingly, in mockery of Christians, about Satan tampering with fossils? DUR?

"That’s the way humans are supposed to be."

Insano who thinks he’s God, suffering from delusions of granduer, says what? Clearly you’re no scientist, no wise man. You are an unoriginal moron though.

"I mean, we’re not Vulcans, thank God."

Yes, we’re not the emotionless moron make-believe aliens made up by an atheist moron. What’s your point unfunny time-wasting dork?

"If you let logic trump faith;"

Dummy, get a dictionary, and look up "logic" and "faith". They aren’t mutually exclusive words. Stop assuming what the Bible teaches, actually carefully read or listen to what you argue against next time, don’t assuming then you won’t be arguing against against your nonsensical imagination.

"if you decide to believe in the illusion that God created to test your faith,"

What illusion? Fantasize much?

"you will fail the test and roast in the fires of hell forever."

No moron, it’s hating God and not repenting of it, which will have you suffering forever in Hell, in total darkness, with a worm constantly eating away at your burning rotting body, while you tearfully scream in agony, forever in shame for having followed your feelings over the obvious truth.

"It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, where ‘their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.’ Everyone will be salted with fire." – Jesus, who, unlike you, has, for thousands of years been saving lives, and improving them, and making peace where there was Hell. Who’s word, unlike yours, is a best seller, and has been for decades. So who are you, to speak against him, and arrogantly like you do? Get a life scoffer.

"Put your faith in the Big Prankster."

Oh the  moron with his backwards mind, calls God "Satan", and makes light of Satan on top of it. No moron, God is The Truth, who made a clearly beautiful universe, clearly full of order, adhering to "laws" and even gave us moral laws, good ones, which you did not come up with. So what was that about "illusions" and "pranks", blind moron? I don’t see randomness or chaos anywhere except in the thoughts of morons like you, who’s logic is no logic at all, but the baseless faith you accuse Christians of having, you dumb moronic hypocrite. Stop projecting, stop trying to drag everyone down to your dumb level. Stop being jealous that God chose to allow others to see the obvious, and that you have no way to refute it but with nutty insults.

"He’s just messing with you."

Unfunny third grade brat who’s shaming himself in front of adults says what?

"He created the fossil record at the same time he created all the living beings on this planet."

Huh? Hey everyone let’s go to and to learn some real science instead of dumb third grader poo-poo jokes. Progress is great!

"This is a test of faith."

Will you stop rambling already dummy? Oy my, look, more stupidity below:

"Doesn’t it comfort you that God would play such a joke on mankind?"

Hey, do you know when to quit an unfunny joke, and when endless repition is useless? How about if I call you moron 6000 times more in a row, then will you get the point you Show-off-of-his-stupid-feelings?

"He gave us the intelligence to figure out the logical progression of life from clues he planted intentionally to fool us,"

Hey dummy, are you still ranting nutsense? Yeah, don’t we all know that what are "clues ["OF EVOLUTION" YOU WEASEL WORDING IDIOT] are clues of evolution to everyone else, including the 60+ million creationists and Calvinists like me? Why do you morons always speak like that for everyone on the planet, including tens of millions who DISAGREE WITH YOU? WHY? DUH? COULD SOMEONE BE A MASSIVELY DELUDED ARROGANT IDIOT? I THINK SO. How about instead of repeating your dumb opinions, you instead study carefully? Is that too hard for your lazy mind to do? Too much pain to think huh? Yes, it is easier to type uncreative unoriginal dumb opinions over and over, but progress is much better, learning the truth is much better, don’t you think?

"then he gave us a book whose wisdom challenges the logical progression he laid"

Still making a fool of yourself? Can you show us this "logical progression", at least one picture of life starting by chance and then evolving into a man? Come on even one transitional fossil out of the billions that supposedly once existed over the billions of years that they supposedly did? Dur? Oh you’re going to show me a picture form who? National Geographic? Aren’t those the same morons that were duped by the archeoraptor "transitional fossil"? Aren’t those the ones who pretended that deformed flatfish becoming more deformed was, LOL, EVOLUTION, and that it couldn’t be explained by Intelligent Design believers (oh yes it’s just so hard to explain why a planet God cursed with death and evil morons like yourself keep getting more deformed, damn, that’s just so hard, dur). So why then why, would you show me anything from them, you idiot, or any other idiots who were duped like them, which includes you?

Another free tip for you: repeating "high words" and phrases doesn’t make you right or intelligent moron, and if it did, you’d be one of the dumbest of all in comparison to creationists and Calvinists. Another free hint: Saying that you’re right doesn’t make you right idiot, so no matter how many times you claim to be logical (and you’ve shown yourself to be a moron instead) it won’t make you logical. But do tell us about this book which trumps anything you’ve ever done in your worthless life… Hello? Still there?

"out and told us to believe in it, or else."

No dummy, he didn’t say that. But thanks for making it ever more clear what an assuming moron you are:

"You may say to yourselves, "How can we know when a message has not been spoken by Yahweh?" If what a prophet proclaims in the name of Yahweh does not take place or come true, that is a message Yahweh has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him." – Deuteronomy 18:21-22 ("Ooopie" you? Go punch yourself in the face now? That’s only the fifth book in the Bible, out of about 66, written about 4000 years ago. Was that too late of a hint for you, oh scientific genius and wise man of the obvious? DUR? DOH?)

"Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the miracles themselves." – John 14:11, Yeshuah, the man born of a virgin, as prophecied (can you prophecy air head?), who is far more famous than you for being both wise and good, unlike you.

"Now he’s waiting to see whether he can float us on a cloud"

No arrogant dummy: "all things are possible with God." – Mark 10:27,

"or roast us on a spit for all eternity based on our decision.

These thoughts are what help me to sleep peacefully at night."

Where does say"roast us on a spit" in the Bible, moron scoffer? Tell us mocker. But since you are making fun of your Creator, and using a lie to do it, can you imagine what he will do to you on the day of judgment? Dur? An can you figure out yet why he would punish a severely evil man like you, for all eternity? Can you figure it out slanderer and mocker of Jesus (Jesus who suffered an eternity of pain and allowed himself to be shamefully executed for evil men like you)? Can you figure it out you who insulted all the Christians, including Christian kids, who suffered to do right, even when being punished unjustly by evil ignorance-loving scoffers like you, even to death? Can you figure it out you who insulted all the Christian kids who have been tortured to death in evil ways by men like you, and the babies who were murdered because their parents were Christians? Dur? Can you figure it out you who WON’T REPENT and MOCKS GOD ON TOP OF IT? DUR? DOH? You’re a dumb scoffer.

"Penalties are prepared for mockers, and beatings for the backs of fools." – Proverbs 19:29

"the smoke of their torment rises for ever and ever. There is no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and his image, or for anyone who receives the mark of his name." – Revelation 14:11

"How long will you simple ones love your simple ways? How long will mockers delight in mockery and fools hate knowledge? If you had responded to my rebuke, I would have poured out my heart to you and made my thoughts known to you. But since you rejected me when I called and no one gave heed when I stretched out my hand, since you ignored all my advice and would not accept my rebuke, I in turn will laugh at your disaster; I will mock when calamity overtakes you, when calamity overtakes you like a storm, when disaster sweeps over you like a whirlwind, when distress and trouble overwhelm you. Then they will call to me but I will not answer; they will look for me but will not find me. Since they hated knowledge and did not choose to fear Yahweh, since they would not accept my advice and spurned my rebuke, they will eat the fruit of their ways and be filled with the fruit of their schemes. For the waywardness of the simple will kill them, and the complacency of fools will destroy them; but whoever listens to me will live in safety and be at ease, without fear of harm." – Proverbs 1:22

"He mocks proud mockers but gives grace to the humble." – Proverbs 3:34

Will those thoughts also help you to sleep at night too? Keep heaping up your sins stupid, you’ll only be punishing yourself in the end.

Tony is, in his own words: "an enthusiast of Buddhism, I am inclined to agree that I would have liked to heard more from the Dalai Lama himself". Yes, but his actions or should I say inactions, Tony the gullible-violence lover, are more important that his words. That video was made in part by those foul-mouthed atheists speaking on the video – now if you don’t believe your own kind, then who will you believe?

The people you support reflect your personality. I support Jesus; who do you support world?