Whitley Strieber and Demons

Shortlink to this page: tiny.cc/communion

These are quotes of Whitley Strieber’s comments on the Coast to Coast AM Radio Show on August 5, 2022 with my comments on various parts of what he said:

Whitley: “(During my first abduction…”) A gentle voice asked me what they could do to calm me down… weird… of course it didn’t work. They assaulted me, they raped me with a machine… I was beat up…. The experience was absolutely devastating. …I also remembered being in the woods. …I thought, ‘My God I was the victim of a crime… I have been physically abused,; there’s no question of that.”

My comment: Why would someone come here, across the vastness of space and just (seemingly) fly around the vastness of space. …It’s about us.”

My comment: It’s because they aren’t “alien explorers”, they’re demons, angels who rejected God and ended up sinners (emotionally and mentally corrupt) and devising ways to torture and corrupt humans.

Whitley: “…There’s a consistent message among the (alien) abduction their concerns have to do with overpopulation, …so it’s not about politics, it’s about nature”

My comment: You didn’t notice Marxist atheists used Malthusianism with  Eugenics to cause worldwide slavery, racial division (Holocaust, mass baby-murders) AND extreme political division and attacks on Christians?!

Whitley: “They (the western mainstream media) never offer solutions,”

My comment: Yes they do, their elitist globalist bribers like Klaus Schwab, George Soros and Bill Gates used/uses the MSM to sow chaos, and these elites tried forcing on the world (non-westerners rejected them) false and deadly vaccines and (not Gates) electric, solar and arbitrarily shutting down coal and nuclear power plants under the pretense of population reduction to improve everyone’s life while reducing pollution (Gates wanted to corner the market with his own nuclear power plants). It’s a pretense since increasing carbon dioxide increases plant growth and prevents desertification and starvation and therefore animal extinctions, but demons prefer “dry places” as the Bible says.

Whitley: “They make their money off scaring people”,

My comment: In part Whitley, but to push their bribers’ business agendas, of elitists (super rich and often homosexual) narcissist globalists who monetarily compete with world leaders like Putin, Xi, Maduro and Cuban and North Korean leaders who, using the pretense of beneficial communism steal from their country.

Whitley: “the people (he means ‘the citizens of the world’) have no respect for the (their) government… (governments)”

My comment: Why should they respect liars? “Russia has no respect for the environment, neither does India (you forgot China?).

Whitley: “…we don’t have time… to reduce carbon in the atmosphere…” monoxide or dioxide? Why don’t we have time? You, like the MSM are using fear mongering to make money as you yourself said no one will use your “environmental” solutions, you said, “It’s not gonna happen.” So you’re offering futility.

Whitley: “it’s not political,”

My comment: Why does it matter if it’s “political” or not? What do you mean? And perhaps it’s not for you, but carbon dioxide reduction is an anti-Christian/religious, anti-conservative/political and a business weapon. The Bible is clear the greatest threats are supernatural and damnation in Hell, but climate change believers keep talking as if they don’t care, don’t know, or blind to the prophecies and signs of the times in the Bible, and only focus on material well-being with at best vague contradictory babble about spiritual things, or things they say are spiritual, and what they teach contradicts God’s word, like as some say, “it’s not about good or evil” or “there is no death, death is an illusion” and other baseless demonic claims.

Whitley: “most of those powerplants are in countries that would welcome the help”.

My comment: You just said Russia, India (China and Venezuala too) don’t care about the environment, so have contradicted yourself. It’s an over generalization. They have most corrupt political, religious and business leadership. Their political eaders steal and meddle with businesses, greedy elitist, gang problems and Satan’s corrupting influence.

Notice the careful and logical wording of the Chinese government on their environmental improvement efforts: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2018/03/12/upshot/china-pollution-environment-longer-lives.amp.html

They say “air pollution”, and it’s true coal plants pollute, but they don’t say “carbon dioxide” which is Satanic nonsense spread by western liberals who pretend they’re scientifically astute. But China welcomes the westerners spreading chaos-producing nonsense propaganda to reduce carbon dioxide and other such nonsense like LGBTQ+ propaganda as it gives them a greater advantage in politics, business and military, and it helps their religious propaganda as they may boast they are morally superior to the westerners who spread sexual immorality and suicide-causing nonsense like that little kids can know they are a wrong gender or neither and therefore should be homosexual, get genital surgery and take puberty-blocking hormones or hormones to make them appear as the opposite of their natural biological gender.

Other notes: Whitley said his (now deceased) wife Anne had said to him while she seemed awake and yet was not (as if were implying she were demon-possessed but from his teachings implies she was being influenced by, quoting him, “aliens, or whatever they are”), “don’t name the book, ‘Body Terror’, call it Communion.” He then implied Anne didn’t remember telling him this, and that he was going to name his book on his alien abduction experience “Body Terror” because, he said (I’m quoting as best I can remember for now), “because this experience I had caused a terror in me unlike anything I’d ever experienced, it was absolutely terrible.”

Now consider that demons are evil, and hate God and some mock God in twisted, blasphemous ways (as opposed to others which maybe keep to themselves mostly or lightly haunt some place): after how Whitley described the torment and rape he went through, and planned to tell the world about it in a book, why would the demon/s who tormented him want it to be called, “Communion”? On Google’s first search result (for a non-Catholic definition) is this,

“Communion is a time to remember the love and sacrifice of Jesus Christ. The Eucharist, another term for Holy Communion, literally means “thanksgiving” in a reference to the fact that Jesus gave thanks before receiving the Last Supper. In 1 Corinthians 11:24, believers are told to have communion with the text, “This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.” Protestant communion is a declaration and celebration of faith. The bread and wine used in the ceremony are a significant part of this tradition.”

We know soon after “the Last Supper” Jesus experienced the beginnings of God’s wrath so he could bear the punishment certain people deserved and eventually suffering it in full, and later the Bible said to remember this supper and his “sacrifice” that is represented before he went through it. So, Anne, under strong demonic influence, wanted to mock this tradition, this “communion” of God and man (and in a way also angels and man as angels interacted with man during Jesus’ life on the earth), a spiritual memorial, tradition, by equating it with Satan’s supernatural “rape” and “absolutely terrible”, “terror within” that Whitley (and surely perhaps other abductees the world would read about or remember reading and hearing about, like the Betty and Barney Hill abduction) described. In short Sat wanted to mock God and get people to think of these supernatural kidnappings (some ending is horrible and bizarre deaths of humans and animals, many never seen again) demon possessions, mental and physical attacks, flesh scarrings and rapes and the “poltergeist” activity often associated with it, including UFOs (which should include balls of lights/”orbs”, which are just demonic illusions or the demon/s making themselves partly visible) as the “communion” Christians speak of. In way one could say Satan is implying he’s giving last meals to the world and causing the world intense suffering, terror and then death afterwards. That’s Satan’s “communion”/intimate communication with mankind (and animals).

Have you heard of and seen “cow mutilations” and other apparent deadly supernatural attacks on  animals, including humans, cats, dogs, horses, sheep, and seal even References below:

“Alien” Abduction and Encounter Accounts:

Dorothy Izatt’s Encounter With Demons Many Claim Are Aliens, As Documented by Unsolved Mysteries: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qjhfhySLzcs

Warning, this site has false or demonic teachings about “Light Beings”: https://ourfamilyofthestars.blogspot.com/2013/10/dorothy-izatt-capturing-light.html?

https://www.theufochronicles.com/2007/11/antonio-villas-boas-total-abduction.html

https://www.wlox.com/story/7936092/gautier-man-shares-story-of-1973-alien-abduction/

https://www.clarionledger.com/story/magnolia/2018/08/16/look-back-charles-hickson-tells-his-abduction-ufo-miss/1006116002/

https://www.clarionledger.com/story/magnolia/2019/03/14/ufo-pascagoula-mississippi-calvin-parker-charles-hickson-other-witnesses/3129121002/

https://www.wlox.com/2019/03/15/pascagoula-ufo-new-witness-comes-forward/

https://www.gulflive.com/mississippi-press-news/2011/09/charles_hickson_ufo_abductee_w.html

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.sunherald.com/news/local/counties/jackson-county/article259619899.html

https://countryroadsmagazine.com/art-and-culture/people-places/the-pascagoula-abduction/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/countryroadsmagazine.com/api/amp/art-and-culture/people-places/the-pascagoula-abduction/

https://www.clarionledger.com/videos/news/2020/07/13/charles-hickson-calvin-parker-recorded-talking-alien-abduction-pascagoula-river/5409533002/

The Pascagoula River Aliens

https://www.google.com/amp/s/osr.org/blog/kids/pascagoula-ufo-encounter/amp/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/5517215/secret-police-audio-files-prove-men-who-claim-they-were-abducted-by-alien-creatures-with-lobster-like-claws-in-craziest-ufo-sighting-ever-recorded-were-telling-the-truth-researcher-claims/amp/

https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/features/60-years-later-the-alien-abduction-of-betty-and-barney-hill/97-ae2cf39f-f89c-4ba2-bde0-5cd69c9ae518

https://www.wmicentral.com/news/arizona_news/40-years-later-most-documented-ufo-sighting-abduction-still-draw-interest/article_f10689c2-8982-11e5-82e2-d3306821f49b.html

https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.4121639

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/news/little-green-men-origins-aliens-hopkinsville-kelly

https://www.grunge.com/299546/the-terrifying-true-story-of-the-cash-landrum-ufo-incident/

https://thejolt.net/2021/08/24/the-greatest-encounter-ever-told/

“Alien” Human and Animal Mutilations and Killings

POTOSI SHEEP SLAYER: (BOLIVIA)

https://allthatsinteresting.com/dyatlov-pass-photos

http://www.coral-hull.com/testimony/fallenangelsexposed/dyatlovpass/injuries-mutilation.html

https://dyatlovpass.com/death

https://sanperdidotradingco.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-dyatlov-pass-incident.html

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/17/has-an-old-soviet-mystery-at-last-been-solved

https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=28u0026amp;v=MNMsWhx8j8cu0026amp

https://badaliens.info/animal-mutilations

ALIENS = DEMONIC & EVIL | Human Mutilation by Aliens: What Are Aliens Doing on Earth?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2454624/Sheep-mutilations-Texas-linked-ALIENS-SATANIC-WORSHIP.html

Highly Strange Dog Death in Arkansas; 2000-Pound Bull Dropped On Log Pile and Calf Skinned

Animal Mutilations Reported in Switzerland, Hollywood and Kansas

https://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/headline_news/2014/07/10/8527-aliens-linked-to-dog-mutilation.html

https://english.pravda.ru/society/110783-cattle_mutilation/

https://www.phantomsandmonsters.com/2022/02/abductee-witnessed-cattle-mutilation-on.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20130723181149/

http://ufos.about.com/od/uforeportsjuly2013/a/Ufo-Abducts-Elk-In-Washington-State.htm

https://web.archive.org/web/20150227100807/

http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=197u0026amp;part=1

https://web.archive.org/web/20150227100807/

http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=197&part=1

https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2021/03/the-mystery-of-the-black-helicopters-ufos-and-cattle-mutilations/

https://www.biographic.com/mystery-of-the-corkscrew-seals/

https://www.mensjournal.com/adventure/mysterious-gray-whale-scars-baffle-experts/

https://apnews.com/article/dan-jenkins-us-news-ap-top-news-wa-state-wire-id-state-wire-3db8829a222e45b08ed93834f792e9c5

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1376533/8-000-cow-abductions-reported-southern-U-S-sent-White-House-panic.html

http://www.mnmufon.org/chup1.htm

How to Be Saved From Direct Demonic Attacks and Possession:

“Alien” (Demon) Abductions/Harassment When Humans Call On Christ For Help

Jesus’ Name Stops “Alien” Abductions

How to be saved from Satan and Hell, ultimately: https://eternian.wordpress.com/life

Conclusion: Whitley is obviously being deceived by Satan, but in my opinion he’s taking advantage of his fame to climb the Marxist-environmentalist social ladder to make more money from those people, by trying to appeal to their environmental cult beliefs, but I think he’s also trying to meaning jn what he went through by trying to appease the demons’ will in a lazy way, that being by selling fear of environmental doom. The message is contradictory and hypocritical as Whitley claims the abduction phenomenon is about humans (a vague way of saying “aliens” are around to do something or other with humans), but he’s wrong as it’s about Satan wanting to war against everything good, perhaps not just out of hate, but what he considers fun, which is to bring torment and death to whatever is not a demon as he is.

Scripture:

“the devil, who deceived them, was thrown into the lake of burning sulfur, where the beast and the false prophet had been thrown. They will be tormented day and night for ever and ever.” – Revelation

A Demon-fooled Mormon and Noory’s Evil Jester ”JC”

On the “NDEs and Open Lines” September 2, 2011 edition of Coast to Coast AM, after Noory interviewed Kathy Baker, he had open lines and spoke with a Mormon grandmother(?) who told him a detailed story. Her story added to the evidence for my claim that demons pretend to be angels and dead humans to fool people into thinking that the Bible (and the religion of fundamentalist Christians that is based on it) are wrong, in other words that you can get to Heaven without needing forgiveness. She told a story about a 5 year old boy whom she took care of who had a mom he hated. I think it was his grandmother. She said one day he said to her that he wanted to die and to make a long story short missed Jesus and wanted to be with him. And the next day said he could travel through time and space and one day found him in a perfect lotus position, and said that angels taught him how to do that. She said that amazed her because she was a Mormon and thought that only her religion was true. That was a stupid statement because simply sitting in a lotus position doesn’t mean there is more than one true religion, it’s just a way of sitting. It’s ironic too since logically she should have seen it as verification of her religion since unlike traditional Christianity, her false version (Mormonism) teaches we are with Jesus before we are born. But Mormons are stupid when it comes to evidence and logic, so no surprise there. It’s also not surprising she was duped into believing whatever it is those demons bothering the kid wanted them to believe, because the Mormon religion is based on a narcissist named Joseph Smith who supposedly received a revelation/having a vision from an angel or angels (and Joseph Smith kept changing his “first vision” story by the way, despite what most Mormon’s claim) or instead God and Jesus who gave Joseph a new gospel, that being that “none of [the churches] are true.” Gospel means “good news” if you don’t know. Great gospel huh? Instead of, “Good news, Jesus suffered and died for sinners making possible their ability to live in peace forever if they repent,” it’s, “You’re all wrong cuz I had a vision no one else saw, and I’ll not tell you why till nine years have gone by while I make my own more exciting Bible to show why you’re all wrong.” So, from the day the the 5 year old said he wanted to die, he got hit by a car 2 weeks later and died in a car “accident”. I suspect rather it was a demon or demons that caused it, he had been trying ever since he said that to kill the boy and possibly get the grandmother, mom and 16 year old guy who hit him, to all commit suicide.

George also let on a silly person called J.C. I think after the Mormon woman was on.

“J.C.” is an annoying person who has been on more than four times, and each time pretends to be a fundamentalist southern Baptist Christian as best I can tell. George said of him that he “cracks me up”. He decided to let J.C. give his usual rants and to do something “different” this time, and let him speak to other guests. The first caller that comes on at that point is a man who wanted to talk about his dead sister and clearly didn’t want to talk to J.C. So what does George do after J.C. trounces on the other caller? Allowed J.C. to move on to another caller while putting the other caller on hold… How about put J.C. on hold till that caller got to tell his story? Two other calls also didn’t want to talk to J.C. out of three and George finally got rid of J.C.

Ironically George had asked J.C. if he believed in ghosts and J.C. said of course and that they were bad spirits. Interestingly he didn’t say they were demons, but implied that they were dead humans who didn’t qualify to get to Heaven. He also seemed to indicate that he had a conscience without saying it when he pointed out that he would seem like a jerk to people listening when the first caller was someone who wanted to talk about his dead sister, which J.C. didn’t realize when joking with him. A person without a conscience wouldn’t have shown concern. So, I don’t think J.C. was “anti-social”. But, that comment about ghosts not being demons, that is unlike a fundamentalist Christian, since F.C.’s believe ghosts are demons pretending to be humans. On top of his usual poor imitation of them, that comment about ghosts he made is evidence to me that he has little knowledge of F.C.s, even if he used to attend some F.C. church. If he did, he must not have paid much attention. His stereotype is very narrow and seems outdated. For example he was saying that he was rescuing some woman from “rock n’ roll” music, which is something unheard of to me. At best a parent will just try and prevent their kid from listening to it, not try to “rescue” them from it. And not many Christians in my experience are against it. The only ones I knew of who were are the ones who follow the narcissist pseudo-Christian Bill Gothard and “orthodox” Presbyterians, not all of whom are against it, but who just have a problem with the lyrics or it not being a style of music that fits their usual moods, just like most people don’t listen to death metal, because it doesn’t fit their usual moods either.

I noticed that George seemed about to say that the angels the 5 year old had seen, might be demons, but him not being the type to offend, especially since the 5 year old died and the grandmother distraught, didn’t say that, but just, with a contrived tone, pretended they were angels coming to take him away. What was interesting is that when J.C. came on, my perception seemed right, since it seemed he was hinting at what he was actually thinking concerning the previous call, was that those angels were demons, because he asked J.C. what he thought of ghosts. That may seem like a stretch, but the grandmother had just gotten off and might have been listening, and if he said, “What do you think of those angels the five year old saw actually being demons trying to send him to Hell?” might have gotten the grandmother to cry more and upset a large number of listeners.

I wonder if George, who claims to be a Catholic, but who is more like a pseudo-Catholic, ever thinks about this verses in the Bible:

“God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong.” – Paul

“Man shall not live by bread alone, by by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” – Jesus

Evolutionist Fantasies – Logical Fallacies Made by Evolutionists

Yesterday, on Coast to Coast AM, “Ian Punnett was joined by psychology professor Douglas Kenrick for a discussion on how the primitive, animalistic underside of human nature, with its sexual fantasies and homicidal tendencies, has actually given rise to the most positive features of our race.” I listened to this show and found it interesting that this professor said that those who were exclusively homosexual were “a puzzle” to evolutionists, because it didn’t help to spread their genes. He made a one or two other nonsensical statements like this, which evolutionists often repeat, which is that “genes want to spread” / “copy themselves”. They do this so often without explaining further what they mean, that no one can tell if such crazy-talk is literal or not. Evolutionists literally believe that animals “desire to spread their genes”, as if that that is what they are thinking when they are “in heat” or trying to mate, and are literally “looking for a mate with good genes” or “the best genes”. It’s absolutely stupid to say such things. Animals obviously are not intelligent to think such things, and how much less would genes have thoughts and desires? And back to the homosexuality “puzzle” which he seemed to imply must have some usefulness; says who? Why would it have usefulness in evolution? Why can’t something be a non-useful trait in evolution? Douglas said himself that exclusive homosexuality is an irrational choice, and yet he insisted that it must have some usefulness that couldn’t be seen (a clear contradiction). Is he biased? Is he double-minded because he is pandering to the homosexuals “community” and the liberals that determine his pay or whether he gets paid or not? Why doesn’t he just say, “It’s an aberration that repeatedly gets eliminated like evolution, like a harmful genetic mutation”. He also said that, “It’s not like homosexuality is a choice”, which was evidence of his bias. Who says it’s not a choice and where is the evidence? There are homosexuals who have said that it is a choice. There are also former homosexuals. Sexual attraction is also something that develops over time; people’s tastes change. And who would argue that babies are born being sexually attracted to anything? Are babies also born in the act of theft? This claim that babies can be born gay and is why they are gay or bisexual seems to be tied in to the illogical belief and excuse that God made sinners. For example, it’s common for ignorant and confused people to blame God for themselves being corrupt, asking, “Why did God make people sinful?” or “Why did God make me gay?” That’s as nonsensical as asking, “Why did God ecreat me in the act of stealing a car?”; no one is created in the act of stealing, lying, murdering, having sexual thoughts or committing adultery, married to anyone, or born a “Jew” (“Jew” and “Jewish” are racial words which are often incorrectly used in place of “Judaism”) or Christian. And a side note: The “Free Will” Christians who often make these claims of God making them the way they are (in the act of doing something including lusting to do certain evil things) are contradicting their claim that they have a completely free will which God isn’t allowed to and doesn’t “mess with”.

Also, does evolution also have desires and want to perpetuate itself? Yet so called “scientists” like Professor Douglas and others who believe in evolution, especially evolution-scientists, keep making the clear logical fallacy of giving emotions to dna and genes, and another fallacy, which is giving animals (and they consider humans to also be animals) false motives. It’s also bizarre that they give animals and their “genes” and dna the same motives, as if the dna and genes that exist in the animal they are in have separate minds of their own and are not apart of one being (creature). Even if they are speaking figuratively, it is a bad form of teaching to repeatedly do this (as bad as the nonsensical cliches “science tells us” and “science says”) and not explain what you mean, and to keep doing that leads to the ones you saying it to, believing such fallacies and to their own hurt, leading them to Hell because of believing such stupid and illogical things. It may be that certain evolution-scientists used this stupid talk to make it easier for kids and “stupid people” to understand, and got into the bad habit of repeatedly explaining things this way, and/or that certain ones with bad intent, noticed that by saying “dna is programmed to replicate”, which some evolutionists will admit, gives the correct implication that it was intelligently programmed (because mindless things like evolution and so called “nature” do not program things, and obviously DNA didn’t create or program itself), and in their hatred of God and the Bible, didn’t and don’t want anyone to know or believe the truth, which is that we were created by God and that the laws of universe, including our biology, were made by him.

Demons Pretending to Be Angels and the Free Will Heresy

On Coast to Coast AM last night, George Noory had on “Doreen Virtue” which C2CAM says, “is a spiritual doctor of psychology and a fourth-generation metaphysician who works with the angelic, elemental, and ascended-master realms.” In other words, truthfully, “she communicates with demons which she has deluded herself into thinking are angels and so called ‘nature spirits'”. Doreen herself on the show acknowledged that demons can pretend to be angels and that people should not romance them for pleasure.

On the show, Doreen claimed that we must ask angels for help to get help from them, which reminded me of Mormons and other Free Will Christians, and suspected that that is why she said that, and then no surprise to me she confirmed it by saying that that was necessary or it would be a violation of our free will, however, she contradicted herself afterwards by saying that the only time they could help without our asking for it was “if it isn’t your time” (to die). It’s a contradiction because it implies that GOD’S WILL supersedes our own, and that isn’t compatible with the heretical “free will” nonsense teaching that I’ve been observing and learning about as I keep hearing the world talk about it. Basically, the world’s free will doctrine is that human free will is a sacred thing that must not be violated and that God won’t violate it (and many non-Christians believe that Earth aka Gaea and/or ‘Mother Nature’ also has a will of its/her own), yet, it’s a lie, and like so many lies, contradicts itself. Here is how it contradicts:

1) Wills are always in conflict everywhere, generally speaking, and depending on the personality of the ones who are not getting there way, it can lead to sin, crime, hateful arguing, rather than one side peacefully giving in to the other. So, to act like human’s wills can’t be violated as if it’s some physical law, is nonsense. It’s clearly observably wrong to claim our wills cannot be gone against successfully. Clearly not everyone’s will can be done as they want it to be done and there will always be unfilled will until there is perfect peace (which God says he will bring about, except in Hell). For the Free Will Christians who believe the Bible, who claim that God can’t go against our will, they are clearly wrong, since the Bible repeatedly claims God does that all the time. Some Christians try to brush that off with the ridiculous explanation that God isn’t really going against anyone’s will (how ridiculous!) when he punishes them, because they want to be punished. That is dumb, absolutely dumb. Sure, some people in bitterness say, “bring it on” or “I don’t care” but that’s because THEY DON’T KNOW THE WRATH in store for them. Like one proverb in the Bible says, “A servant cannot be corrected by mere words.” That (rebellious) servant can’t be corrected by mere talk because they aren’t feeling any pain and will especially dismiss warnings if they are feeling pleasure. It’s the same with a rebellious child or any person with a bad habit and who is having “a good time”: unless there is a painful negative consequence, emotionally or physically, they won’t stop. Further, why do so many people, when committing a crime, try to hide that they are committing a crime, or run when they think they are in danger of getting caught for that crime, or lie in court over whether they committed one or not? OBVIOUSLY, it’s because they don’t want to feel pain for what they did, not “BECAUSE THEY WANT TO BE PUNISHED”. But in order to defend their backwards doctrine, that is how absurd and childish heretics must think: backwards, backwards to the point of embarrassing absurdity that even kids who aren’t brainwashed can recognize is obviously stupid and illogical reasoning that goes against what even stupid people know is stupid.

2) If God’s will is also sacred and cannot be violated, then how can everyone else’s will also be sacred and forbidden from being violated being that God’s will is often not the will of man or anything else? That is a clear contradiction. And it is obvious that if anyone’s will is going to always be done, it’s going to be the all-knowing all-powerful eternal Creator’s, not the created things that like ants compared to him. The Bible even says that God’s will is always done in Heaven, and has us pray that it will always be done on Earth, and even Jesus said to God, “…but your will (be done), not mine.” Doreen tried to dismiss the Bible and untrustworthy because, “it’s been rewritten many times,” the cliche attack of an ignoramus who doesn’t know or refuses to acknowledge that the Bible is backed up by many old copies of itself showing that it has been copied very accurately in all the places that matter most, and that there is no evidence of loss of text. Her logic is also wrong in what she implied, which was that many copies necessarily lead to errors. She also stupidly implied that God can’t preserve his own word. With such an unreliable God why does Doreen pretend to love and honor him and that he’s in control? If he can’t preserve his own word, his laws, his commands to love, then how can we? And why follow him if he can’t keep track of what he says or if we can’t? Again: contradictions. That is the lot of liars: lies and contradictions.

3) Why would there be an exception like Doreen claims, that “unless it’s “not your time” angels can’t help you”? Is it just because she said so? Because some angel supposedly told her so. And so what if one did? Can demons pretend to be angels? She herself said so, so then she cannot simply claim, “angels never lie.” And being that humans can repeatedly make the same mistakes and be deceived till death, for years, she can’t claim, especially as a religion-ignorant, which she clearly is, that she is undecievable, immune to be fooled, tricked. Further, some demons, not merely staying in one place and keeping to themselves, go out of there way to lie to humans and deceive them, and having lived for thousands of years, have mastered deception and know how humans react to all kinds of situations and suggestions. And how long has Doreen lived in comparison to such demons? She sure has not lived long enough to become a master of the truth, nor has she studied well enough as was indicated by her evil broadside attacks against Christians, like that they “blackmail” people into believing there religion and her illogical vague statement that “preaching fear” is negative energy (a meaningless statement) with the implication that that is bad. And guess what Doreen is doing by making those claims? According to her vague nonsense, she’s also “preaching fear”. It’s also a clear lie to claim as she did, that all Christians do is talk about fear. Truly she’s a lying ignoramus. Who doesn’t know that millions of Christians have said and still do, “God is love” or “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whoever believes in him will not perish, but have everlasting life” or “love your neighbor as yourself” or “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” or “love your enemies” and “bless those who curse you” and the most famous of all, “Do unto others as you would have them do to you,” all of which are verses from the Bible. Yet she slanders all Christians, including the children, as “preach”ers “of fear” and negativity. Clearly it’s Doreen who is the preacher of fear and negativity by mainly focusing on what she perceives are “negative” things about Christians and mainly finding fault with them, when clearly they have done much good and continue to do so (I’m talking about true Christians, but even Free Will ones do some good, though at the expense of the truth about how to get saved and to lead people away from true salvation, though not all realize they are misleading people).

4) Doreen Virtue also made clearly wrong claims, which is that angels can’t help you unless you ask for it: but as she herself would know, angels are always helping people without them asking for it, and some don’t even believe in angels when they are helped by them. Many people also don’t pray for the help of angels, but ask for God’s help, knowing that he uses angels to do things for him, yet Doreen says to pray to the angels. Why would you pray to the angels rather than God who is in control of them? If you want a coworker to be friendly to you or to help you who is in a different state, do you pray to the coworker or to God? But Doreen hates God, so refuses to go to him for help, but instead wants to worship what he created.

5) Concerning again Doreen’s claim that angels need our permission to help us, how can she say that when surely she hears stories all the time of people being helped by angels and not knowing they were angels or being helped without asking? That could be seen a deliberate deception or insanity for her to ignore what she repeatedly sees contradicts her “free will” belief, which is really about pride and a childish attitude of rebellion towards God. And if angels need our permission, then doesn’t God? Does God need our permission for anything? Obviously to say he does is stupid. That’s lying say that I need the permission of a toy I made, even a living one with a mind, to do anything to it, or that a parent needs the permission of the child to move it somewhere, teach it something, feed it something, give it a gift, love it or even talk to it (which leads to a paradox: how can you ask for permission to talk without first talking if not given permission to talk?) And if a parent doesn’t need its the permission of its children for anything but a few exceptions, how much less does God the creator and sustainer of all things need it? And consider the evil consequences of this free will logic, at least Doreen’s: Humans must ask each other for permission to help each other in all circumstances, including to save each others lives. Consider how many more people in the world would be ignorant, sad, injured and dead from such a law. But many people realize the evil of such bad logic, and have made “good Samaritan” type laws as are mentioned on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law. It’s noteworthy that Wikipedia however, doesn’t point out the origin of such laws: God’s word.

“Do not let anyone who delights in false humility and the worship of angels disqualify you for the prize. Such a person goes into great detail about what he has seen, and his unspiritual mind puffs him up with idle notions.” – Colossians 2:18

“the devil took [Yeshua] to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. “All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.” Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.’” – Matthew 4:8-10

“I will keep on doing what I am doing in order to cut the ground from under those who want an opportunity to be considered equal with us in the things they boast about. For such people are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.” – 2 Corinthians 11:12-14

“who are you, a human being, to talk back to God? Shall what is formed say to the one who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’ Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?” – Romans 9:20-21

Update: 6-16-2011

Yesterday, after having written the above (except Romans 9:20-21 which I added while adding this note), I finally realized the solution to what was a long and great mystery to me: “Is the human will and all wills “random” (because random would seem to be the result of ‘not controlled’, in other words, not a machine that is just programming or being moved around by God directly or indirectly), and is randomness necessary, and if random, how could God predict what would happen in the future correctly? And is a random will necessary for self-awareness and responsibility for the actions of the person who makes choices using their will?” God’s word had the answer all along. First of all, it makes it clear that God predestines everything (and the claim that God doesn’t predestine anyone to Hell is stupid). God doesn’t destine some things and others allow to be loose, random and free to do whatever. Second, there is no evidence that a will must be random in order for a person to be aware of themselves and that their choices and to be responsible for them.

“To humans belong the plans of the heart” – Proverbs 16:1

“A person’s steps are directed by Yahweh” – Proverbs 20:24

“In Yahweh’s hand the king’s heart is a stream of water that he channels toward all who please him.” – Proverbs 21:1

11:11, Synchronicities and Evidence of Intelligent Design

About two weeks ago I think, while looking up more information on Srinivasa Ramanujan, a super mathematical genius who shamed atheists and Hinduism by his belief in some sort of God and gods etc., and because by obeying the Hindu religion his life was cut short, probably the greatest Indian who ever lived next to Christian ones (which shames Hinduism in that they lost their best man). Well, I found some British radio show on him, and downloaded it, and learned of a mathematical law, which is that the number one shows up the most frequently out of all other numbers. Those with a large amount of understanding and a brain might think, “Shouldn’t all numbers how up equally as much as the other since the universe is just random?” But the answer, is, NO. First of all, the universe isn’t random, it always follows laws that God put in place, always follows them unless he intervenes or changes them. To say otherwise is to make a Randomness of the Gaps, and to claim that “randomness did it” (for those of you who don’t know what I mean, I’m pointing out the hypocrisy of those who believe in randomness who also mock Christians by pretending that they merely explain why anything is by claiming merely that, “God did it” and claim such a God is a God of the gaps (gaps meaning “gaps in Christian knowledge” implying that Christians are very ignorant in the context these idiots use it in).

ANYWAYS, concerning George Noory’s claim that people are always seeing 11:11 when they look at a clock, I don’t know if he is right, since people look at clocks all the time and don’t see that number. George is probably imagining this because it’s four ones in a row, which he thinks is weirder than other number patters. It’s as silly as attributing something special to the number 100 or the year 1111 or 2000 or 2111 or 2222. However, you would see the number 1 more often then other numbers, so, if you see it more often on clocks when you do look, that isn’t out of the ordinary. To me it’s another indication that God exists. The number one being the most common number reminds me of Fibonacci numbers and the  chirality phenomenon, which is a name for the right-sided characteristic which all molecules in the human body have (and God made it that way).

And the reason I made this post (had finished most of it yesterday) was because a Buddhist or fan of Buddha put 11:11 in the subject of his email to me, which, in a way, was perpetuating the natural frequency of the number, which ironically, got me to write about it.

After I was done with this post, which didn’t include the above sentence, or this one, I glanced at my viewership stats, and was astonished a little when I saw the stats for the most viewed “page”, and then looked farther down, and was astonished again. This is what I saw some minutes ago… (I just looked at the clock and it’s 11:16 PM):

Update 3/23/2011:

I forgot to show this pic yesterday, which I took after I woke up and looked at my stove clock for the first time that day:

The clock was an hour behind.

Galaxies beautifully arranged everywhere, but hardly an atheist will think

On Coast to Coast AM tonight, at 10:24 P.M., Seth Shostak, of SETI, was asked by a logic-ignorant caller if whether or not it was a coincidence that during a solar eclipse it was a coincidence that the moon perfectly blocked out the sun (and asked some stupid questions), and Seth, an evolutionist and probably a Big Bang believer, said that he thought it was a coincidence. He didn’t say it was, I just realized, but that he didn’t think it was anything other than a coincidence. But when I listened to the caller bring up this fact, and knowing the other things about the universe and this planet and the solar system that make life possible here and possible all over the universe, knowing about the so called “fine tuning”, I was amazed, and knew it was no coincidence. The next caller was angry at Seth for not acknowledging that we were being visited by extraterrestrials, and brought up witnesses with high reputations for being honest and very intelligent, whom the caller said would be willing to sign affidavits. Seth gave an illogical and deceptive reply by saying that science wasn’t done by affidavits but by experiments. No Seth: science is not that simple; it doesn’t exist in a vaccuum. In science a hypothesis is made, like this: If intelligent life existed outside of Earth, and decided to visit various planets, and there is a great amount of intelligent life outside of Earth (and Seth emphatically implied that he believed there could be billions around the time that he was asked the question about the solar eclipse), and many of these living things were like humans, only able to survive by breathing in gas or liquid of a speficic type, needing protection from various temperatures and chemicals, and if space travel can be accomplished in various ways using ships with widely varying materials and energy sources, than we should see objects entering into our atmosphere from space which appear similar and very different to craft which we build, which show great speed and or manueverablity due to the aliens having enough intelligence to reach earth from great distances and who would logically want to creat a ship that can quickly avoid capture by enemies among themselves or among aliens, and to avoid collisions to be able to witness any amazing discoveries they make back to their own alien kind and bring back anything of value, or to trade with other aliens. Further, if any of these aliens appear to be non-human and not very similar to any life that is known to have existed on Earth since its beginning, than it would be further evidence that they were not from Earth, but outside of it. And to carry out an experiment to verify if such a thing were true, all one would have to have people watch the sky all over, and observe if there are any objects which appear to have superior speed and manuverability and a different shape than craft made by humans, and also to observe the outside of the atmosphere, and also to observe if anyone seese any beings which come out of these objects which appear to be non-human. Conveniently, people are often watching the sky and there are also cameras in human-made ships outside of the planet looking down upon it and away from it. And what are the results? There have been millions of people who have seen such craft that show superior speed and manueverablity to human-made ships (before we may have acquired alien technology and used it or copied it or both), and sometimes there are multiple witnesses to a craft, sometimes over one hundred, sometimes thousands. As for whether or not there have been two witnesses or more who have seen an extraterrestrial entering or leaving such craft, I don’t know, but there have been many people who saw aliens leaving or entering such craft, but with no second witness. There have also been two or more witnesses to an apparent alien or aliens (for example in Brazil (2) where a ship with some inside had crashed, and living occupants went out of it, with at least one was captured) There are also a few people who have regularly seen such a thing happen (which count as repeat experiments, and even if they were not intentional experiments, that would not invalidate what was seen and make the sighting invalid evidence).

How ironic that Seth and other God-deniers are blind to what is right in front of them, that even searching far out past this planet, they still see no sign of intelligence anywhere, not even when they see countless glorious galaxies containing countless glorious stars. Like God says of such people: they are always searching, but never coming to the truth.

Ian Punnet Does Some Good on Coast to Coast AM

Last night Ian had on a guest named Robert Landori on Coast to Coast AM, and as usual snorting a laugh soon into the show. At one point Landori made a very ignorant comment, claiming that Christianity taught that mankind was good but sometimes fell off the boat. When Ian began to reply to Landori’s mistake it sounded to me at first like he was going to overlook the comment or try to say something in agreement with it, but instead and he seemed to seemed to be trying to gently correct him, by just saying the opposite without a hint of anger in his voice, and his guest seemed to agree with Ian’s response. Whether or not Ian should have been blunt and simply said that he was wrong and gave evidence for the opposite I’m not sure, but at least he gave some correction. When I first heard the topic of the show I was somewhat angry, since I was hoping for something about the supernatural or cryptozoology or UFOs, but the guest and the stories he told turned out to be interesting and in keeping with the theme of the show, some were strange, yet all amazing, to me at least.

Jews With Heart-Walls Turn to Dead False Prophet

At about 11:40 P.M. yesterday, on Coast to Coast AM, the following exchange was made between George Noory and conartist Dr. Bradley Nelson (a moron who claims that there are more than nine emotions, and had trouble getting the number straight when asked and who claimed you can inherit emotional problems called heart-walls composed of more than 20 emotions):

Dr. Bradley Nelson: When someone in high school or college tells you to follow your heart, that is the best advice they can give you.

George: Absolutely.

Since when is following your heart, let alone of all times when you are teen or in college, the best advice, let alone the best advice? How many more divorces, yelling arguments, physical fights, crushed feelings leading to suicide and baby-murders does there need to be before people like the self-proclaimed emo-doctor, doctor Bradley, realize that he and heart-followers like him are the ones creating so called heart-walls, not curing them? And this conartist, when asked by a caller how she could find out how to remove her heart-wall, advised her merely to go to his website, watch his videos and buy his books, and that that would make her certified to remove them. How convenient that he, having the cure for all of humanities emotional problems, can’t give a basic explanation as to how to cure the world, and can only do so through profit. To my disgust the caller flattered him greatly and praised him for his advice – what advice? Here’s simple free advice for getting rid of “pent up” emotions, so called heart-walls: find out from the Bible what you should feel and why and why you feel the way you do. The short answer: because God gave us the ability to feel, and allowed us to to sense things which we would desire or dislike, be happy, sad, angry, afraid, curious, worried, amazed or surprised over, and because of man’s inability to be logical apart from God’s love and help, they chose to feel things that they should not in certain situations. And how can this Bradley Nelson be a doctor of emotions and not know there are at a maximum, no more than nine core emotions? Imagine someone calling themselves a doctor of the body and first claiming there was an extreme of 180, and then a few seconds later, 18. Would you call such a person a doctor or think him qualified to heal you of anything, or even sane? Would you trust him with your life?

George Noory also interviewed a heretic Moshe Yess, a so called “rabbi” and Judaic (people often mistakenly refer to Judaics as “Jews”, as if there is no Jewish race) who was a heretic. He believed in a ridiculously named “Messiah” who was, get this: dead. How corrupt can Judaism get? So now instead of waiting for a living Messiah, instead of worshiping a living man, now there is a sect that worships a DEAD messiah! Talk about hating God! Instead of worshiping the true Messiah who died for the sins of the world, who has come back to life, whose demonstrated his all-surpassing love and power before many witnesses, a section of the Judaic group has become so twisted that they not only reject that one, but instead accept some obscure demonic Judaic who died in the 90’s, and expect him to return! How convenient that after the New Testament already came up with the concept of a Messiah who could die and who would return does now, these Judaics, come up with one 2000 years later and act like they have something original to give the world, and so original, as to be ridiculous. The Rabbi Schneerson cult also claims not to be a “team” that is above other teams, but that this Rabbi Schneerson will save everyone. The rabbi also claimed that there will be nothing “negative” when Rabbi Schneerson returns to change the universe, which is a comment that makes it a New Age cult: New Agers smear everything that they personally dislike (including fundamentalist Christians) as “negative” or evil, in place of the word immoral or wicked because those words remind people of the Bible and it’s laws. The word evil is also a Biblical word, but was a word that was used for hundreds of years, unlike “negative”, as a term for what was generally considered “immoral” by everyone, though it was also used like the word “negative” in that a good/righteous or decent person or group would be called “evil” by someone or some group that personally disliked them. The word “negative” however, unlike “evil” is used much more vaguely and more often used.

You can always hear many false Christians and non-Christians, including atheists, calling other groups, including true Christians, “negative”, but less so “evil”, because that word evil, as I said, is a biblical word, further, true Christians use it often to describe some non-Christians who repeatedly reject Christ after he is explained to them (I don’t mean that true Christians will say to anyone’s face that they are evil after first seeing what they are like, but to others so as not to get into a physical fight or embarrass the evil person or group they met). And so, the non-Christians who were condemned as evil will avoid using the word evil so as not to be reminded of the condemnation from Christians. So, this Schneerson cult is “universalist”, meaning that ultimately, or indirectly, it approves of any and every belief, including evil ones, with the exception of the true religion (the one given by God), because the true religion (which promotes only the truth and is accepted fully only by those who are honest), directly opposes universalism, which accepts lies and liars.

I’ve already been given eternal life, and don’t need a dead “rabbi Schneerson”, who comes on not just 2000 years late on the seen, but who even when he died was late in letting the world know he existed, let alone died, to give me life.

At 12:46 A.M., George asked this “rabbi” Moshe Yess: Is there anything to our free will? …can we change them [future events]?

This question once again demonstrates the misconception the world has over the meaning of “free” and “will” and no surprise then the term “free will”. The Mormons and every false Christian (that includes Catholics like George Noory), misunderstand “free will” to mean “free physical actions” as in freedom to do ANYTHING you want to do. George asked if free will could change physical events, because he was confused, or, was completely deceived into thinking his will could affect physical events (and he does believe literally in wishful thinking, that willing something to happen with enough will power can change the physical environment (just like many insane Pentecostals believe, who believe they can wish money into their purses and wallets with faith). He may have been asking the rabbi that question to see if the rabbi was on his side, his side that precious “free will” (a subconscious code for “Man’s sovereignty) was sacred, and above God’s will.

At 1:51 A.M., the false rabbi reminded me of something George Noory says now and then, which is that he doesn’t believe in coincidence, and I immediately realized that by saying that, Noory was contradicting himself in his belief that the future can be changed. For George, who is a believer in a thinking God who designed and created the universe, who still interacts in the world at least indirectly – for him to say that there is no coincidence, is to say that there is no randomness, no chaos, but that everything happens based on someone’s will, and due to “natural laws” which God created, and which God sets aside at times to accomplish something according to his will.

I also noticed that a few minutes later, near the end of the show, that the false rabbi went against the statement of the final caller, which was that the world was not controlled by an illuminati, but that we were all under the control of God. This was deceptive statement, and unwise to say, because as I often point out, the world doesn’t understand “free will” and God’s control correctly, and so when someone simply says God control’s everything to the masses, it doesn’t advance their understand but ends up creating more contention, in general. His reply was also deceptive, because the Bible itself says that Satan is the god of this world, figuratively, but that literally there are demons who rule certain sections of this planet, who, like human rulers, fight against the good (however the demons also fight against angels, which demons once were).

I’m curious if Noory, being someone who confuses “free will” with being able to do whatever you want to do, took the claim of the rabbi that God is in control to be true or false, and if he understood it to mean a general control (as in spiritual to a limited degree, and also fully environmental) or if he took it to mean in control of even the will of others (which wouldn’t make sense by the way since a will by definition has to be free to choose otherwise it’s not a will). l also wonder what the false rabbi meant by saying “control”: if he meant complete control or a general overall control so that his plans are always fulfilled without failure of any kind.

There was one good thing that Moshe Yess said, which was that he distinguished Jews from Judaism, indirectly acknowledging/implying that a Jew was still one racially, and not only a person who practiced Judaism.

What is the Best Evidence for Reincarnation and Karma If Any?

On Coast to Coast AM tonight, George Noory was once again allowing the reincarnation and karma deception to be spread, this time by Barbara Martin and Dimitri Moraitis. These false teachings, which besides having no evidence for them, contradict God’s word, and God said that we only have one life, and that after an unforgiven person dies, they sleep and await condemnation and permanent imprisonment in Hell, and that when an forgiven person dies, their spirit goes to Heaven immediately and their physical body will one day be resurrected in perfect health and transformed into an immortal one that can withstand the glory of God and be in its presence without harm.

Teaching that reincarnation and karma are real, is dangerous. It’s dangerous because they make God out to be a liar, but God is the truth, and gives the true and only way to eternal peace, and who warns us with an eternity of non-stop suffering in Hell if we are not forgiven by Him, and His forgiveness comes with his Son’s salvation from sin, temporary pain and imprisonment in Hell (how to be saved is explained here).

Many people say that the best evidence for reincarnation comes from little kids who say things that they only could have known if they had been another person (as in “had a previous body”) and could only have certain behaviors that are similar or the same to that previous body if it had been theirs, and that another evidence is having a birthmark similar to some wound or fatal wound of the other body from which they have memories from. But there is no logical connection as to why they must have had that previous body merely because they have some of the memories of that body and some similar or some of the same behaviors of it. And, because of other possibilities as to how those memories and behaviors can be acquired, and with no proof that it is from reincarnation only, it cannot be proven that reincarnation would be the only mechanism by which those memories and behaviors were acquired. For example, demons (former angels that God has permanently shunned for rebelling against him) possess people, and are able to take over their bodies, including brain, and being that they have demonstrated the ability to manipulate flesh in supernatural ways, for example making it impervious or highly resistant to damage, causing it to change shape without damaging it, restoring it after changing its shape, and levitating it. So it is not a stretch to think that a demon could read the memories of a person it possesses and have done so, or that they memorize the events that have happened in the lives of various people, and later implant those memories into someone else after that person dies, and that some go so far as to manipulate the flesh of a baby in the womb so that it has some birthmark similar to the person whose memories it is implanting into the baby’s brain. Some demons may have targeted certain babies for confusion because the demon saw that the baby had a birthmark that reminded the demon of some non-fatal or fatal wound that it saw had been inflicted on some human that it had memories of. According to Scripture, demons in general try to lead people away from the truth about God, especially trying to prevent them from learning the truth about how to be saved. They use subtle ways to lead people astray all the way to trying to force them to reject Christ by having non-Christians persecute them, or by causing fights between Christians in various ways, like by getting some false or non-Christian to turn them against each other using false information or some unkind acts to provoke them to unkind against each other. Scripture makes it clear that demons can memorize things, can have great power and intelligence (like Satan), and can be extremely hateful (Satan tried many ways to get Jesus to fall, and fooled “the world” into murdering Him, but for all his scheming, God’s perfect wisdom caused Satan’s wisdom in evil, to backfire).

The claims of those in the reincarnation-believing group refute their own claim that reincarnation exists or can be said to be true in some case, this is because some say that demons exist and can possess people, some believe in “walk-ins” (which is when a spirit from a dead human possesses a living human’s body), some say that after a person dies they go to Heaven (with other human spirits) and choose the life they won’t live next, some say that aliens can possess a person’s body and many believe in psychic powers and that knowledge can be gained from reading the minds of others or seeing into the past or future supernaturally, and some believe a person can leave their body and learn things outside of their body, and even learn any past event from a spiritual place where it is recorded. If these seven things can happen according to many of them, why do they claim with certainty that when anyone has “past memories” that they didn’t go through in their current body, that it must have been because they once had another body, that they must have been reincarnated? And should Buddhists who don’t believe in any of the other seven possiblities claim with certaintity that reincarnation is the only reason why someone would have memories from another person when Buddhists claim that reality is an illusion or that they are deluded until they reach a state of perfection? And even if a person who believes in reincarnation doesn’t believe in any of the other seven possibilities, but unlike Buddhists believes reality to be a definite thing and that reality is not even subjective, how can they state with certainty that “past memories”, behaviors from another person’s body, and a birthmark similar to some wound they had, is due to reincarnation if they can’t see how the “past memories” are gained and when they can’t show any evidence that demons don’t manipulate people anymore than anyone can show evidence that God doesn’t exist and that the most of the Bible isn’t his word, or that his word hasn’t been effective in persuading people to do good, like not hating others but loving them, and not lying, stealing, murdering, but helping people to live well, or survive and to be at peace (except to those who refuse such help and even attack Christians who try to give it)?

As for the birthmark “evidence”, why would a baby have a birthmark similar to a wound from a previous body it had? What would cause such a wound? It would require intelligence for such a wound to be imitated on its new body, but what would make more sense, that the baby, in its stupid ignorant state decided to replicate the wound, or that another being did, one which obsesses on violence and is murderous (demons), or that the birthmark is natural and a demon targeted the baby when it saw the mark? An argument I can think of against the targeting argument, is that the demon would have to have to go far and wide looking for someone who had a wound in the same spot that lead to their death or was some area where they had cancer, or some traumatic relation like that, but such an argument ignores that demons talk with each other, can share memories (at least 1000 according to the Bible possessed one person), and aren’t all physically limited to slowly reading and understanding information like us, and aren’t all limited to certain languages, but could read information from a hard drive without needing a monitor or printer to read what is on it, and even when the hard drive is not powered on, and so, could scan through billions of hospital, police and obituary records and learn about various wounds or skin diseases or skin infections certain people had, and find someone who had such a problem on their skin that matched the birthmark of the baby they want to confuse (and those who get to know the baby), and then the demon could look for other personal information on the deceased people they chose for their scheme, asking other demons if they know anything much about those people it chose, and if one or more does, then transmitting the memories it has of that person into the little child all at once or over time or repeatedly putting the memories into the child. Some children have reported having nightmares of certain memories, supposedly from “a past life”, which I believe is from a demon somehow causing the child to focus on that memory or memories while that child is dreaming.

Concerning karma, the concept doesn’t make sense because it for people to “get back what they put out” or as said, to have negative or positive consequences for a financial act, and for everything they do, karma would have to be alive and have a mind and be intelligent and know right from wrong, and have the desire to judge and punish or reward or give consequences. Even if karma were not that specific, it would still have to have intelligence in order to do such things. How can a non-living thing, like a rock, tell the difference between a good or bad act, or good or bad speech? Further, it would have to coordinate all of the “positive or negative” things it did to people so that each one got what it deserved, otherwise it would be chaotic and nonsensical. On top of that, karma would also have to deal with giving positive or negative things to non-human things, even aliens if they existed. How could a non-living thing, unless it was programmed with future events, know how to respond in every situation? And how is it able to manipulate every single thing in such a way that everyone “gets what they deserve” or “gets What they put out”? It would have to be a computer far more advanced that we can comprehend, and the one who programmed it even more advanced since it would have to know how to program such complex tasks and would have to have the power to give the computer such power to manipulate the countless things in this universe so that everything came out as the programmer wanted it to. Karma then wouldn’t be karma as Buddhists, Hindus or New Agers claim it is, but a tool of a being who would be best described as God, and who has destined all things already since this karma machine would always achieve its goals. And no Buddhist, Hindu or New Ager has ever even hinted that karma fails, so they cannot argue without showing that they simply being contentious, argumentative, that karma doesn’t always work out. And even if it didn’t always work out, what would their point be? It would be self-defeating to argue that since they would be admitting that karma isn’t just, but unfair, and it wouldn’t explain how karma knows what to do to a person for their actions, how it knows a good thing from an evil thing.

Another problem with karma is that it justifies any evil act committed against another person, because according to the doctrine on karma, whatever bad thing happens to you, you deserve. So if a baby or little kid or anyone is abused in some way, sexually or not, or murdered, it was because they deserved it. Is that true? According to the Bible even a person who is suffering or who is in need or handicapped, isn’t always suffering or in need or handicapped because God is punishing them, but to test them (as evidence for or against something, like if they are patient or impatient, good or bad), or to show his love through them, like when Jesus healed various people who were handicapped.

Another problem with karma is that it justifies (according to the doctrine or personal belief of many who believe in karma) someone giving things to the rich who don’t need what they give them and which rich people have no intention of giving what they received from that person to the poor or little or anything of the things they already have and even things they most likely don’t or won’t need in the future. And the personal beliefs of many who believe in karma, even justify giving such things to the rich even if those rich people are stingy and hoard their wealth, even if they are giving to such rich people out of kindness or love for them. But according to the doctrine or personal belief of others, those things, including gifts, should be given to the poor who need them, or at least the poor who are decent, especially to ones who are righteous or good, and to such poor who even share with others who are poor. So who does karma consider to be in the right? And according to the simplistic doctrine that most have on karma (I’ve never heard them debating this and only bring up their thoughts about it if any when I bring it up to them), if an evil person who mostly does evil, but to whom mostly good is done, deserves that goodness. So for example, when Hitler was murdering the Jews and was having good things done to him and when many were doing almost whatever he asked them to do, it was because he deserved it. Or if someone was hoarding their wealth all throughout their life and using it for little good or only using it to make a profit and doing it oppressively in general (there have been many people like that all throughout history), and those people had many good things done to them, more than the evil things, it was because they deserved it.

The doctrine of karma reminds me of the false tithing doctrine that many false Christians (and sadly some true Christians) teach, because both are vague and the proof for both is arbitrary. Promotors of tithing (especially Pentecostals) claim that if something bad happens to you, it was because you were robbing God of money, of 10% of your weekly income, and that if you were giving it, you’d get 100 times back sometime in the future, unless you “didn’t have enough faith” (when you gave the money?). Isn’t that vague to say, “sometime in the future” or “didn’t have enough faith”? How much faith do you need to get the 100 times back of the money you gave, and how long must you have faith? Ironically such Christians refer to a passage in Malachi as evidence that you must tithe your money to God, however that verse indicates that God was asking them to test him, to see if he would reward them for tithing (something other than their money) and taking into account their lack of faith so that they would have faith after seeing Him pass their test. And how much faith would they have if God said, “I’ll reward you later, sometime, just wait.” Who would have faith after 60-80 years and believe God after waiting for so long? How would they know after having waited so long that the reward, the “reaction” wasn’t just “chance”? And how is karma any different? When is it working? When is it taking place? Does it take place right after an evil or good act or is there a delay? And how long is the delay? It matters because since there is no Laws of Karma, unlike in the Law in the Bible, the many commandments in the Bible, so it’s impossible to know when you are breaking the laws of karma. By the way, I’ve also noticed that those who strongly believe in the tithe-for-profit doctrine treat people cruelly, coldly or with unkindness. They justify their treatment of others this way because of their, “You reap what you sow” belief which they take out of context in the Bible to make it seem that because God is punishing you then they then have the right to hate you and also have the right to punish you. They might as well say, “You get what you put out.” In fact, a Pastor Galen of First Family Assemblies of God Church in Albuquerque, who is the father of the younger and unmarried one who is also a pastor in his church, told me that I was the most negative person he ever met (after reading a short critique of his son’s misteachings). And by ignoring God’s law and replacing it with their “Be positive whenever you talk to me or else I have the right to treat you negative and will do so” doctrine, they might as well be teaching the vague doctrine of karma, which can suit whoever believes in it.

Another problem with karma, is how to know how to comply with it so that what you want to happen to you, happens, but the problem is, how can I know what it considers good or evil being that it doesn’t show it in any way and can’t be found or accessed? Does it consider it a good thing to kill a person who is mostly destructive or bent on destroying things, or does it consider it an evil eating certain food in front of another person considers immoral to eat? Does it consider saying, “Allah doesn’t exist”, “Buddha doesn’t exist”, or “Moses didn’t exist” evil things to say? Does it consider that one person’s conscience isn’t the same as someone else’s, and that some people have no conscience, like psychopaths? Does it consider any lying to be evil, even a lie that doesn’t harm anyone but instead saves a life or lives? Does it consider stealing a weapon or what someone intends to use as a weapon to commit murder a good thing or a bad thing? Where is the rule book or commandments of karma? Some might argue that karma judges you by your own standard, but if that is true, and my standard is to do whatever I feel like: steal, lie, commit adultery, hate people for no good reason, dishonor my parents even when they do good to me, abuse animals, endanger the lives of others, including by polluting in such a way that it is a certain danger to others, or murdering people whenever I feel like it, and I do those things, then shouldn’t karma “reward” me? Some might argue that no one is like that, but that isn’t the point, the point is that that can be a standard, and besides that, there are people like that, and hundreds of millions if not billions of people have died because of people who made it their standard, at least for a moment, to speak and act in those wrong ways.

Almost every race and culture believes in demons, with the exception of most Buddhists, and even many atheists believe in “negative spirits (without a body)”, so to claim that reincarnation must be the reason for anyone having past memories of being in another body, and having a birthmark related to that other body, and having certain behaviors of that other body, is either assuming things or ignoring other evidence or both.

Update 10/29/2010:

References:

The Buddhist and Hindu View of Reincarnation and Karma: http://www.thebigview.com/buddhism/karma.html

The Hindu Caste System and Their Teaching On Reincarnation and Karma: http://philosophy.lander.edu/oriental/caste.html

Ian Punnett’s Lies, Near Death Experiences, OOBE, Demons and Hell

This morning on the Coast to Coast AM radio show Ian Punnett was hosting and interviewed Pim van Lommel concerning his book Consciousness Beyond Life,The Science of the Near-Death Experience. Ian, a false Christian heretic sophist on the Bible, once again spread misinformation about it, saying that it spoke little of Hell (wrong) and that what it did say described it as a place of rebirth. HUH!? Where did Idiot Punnett get that from? According to the Bible once a human is in Hell you don’t get out, and it is a place of permanent continuous painful punishment and sorrow with little comfort:

“There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores. The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. In hell, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’ But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’ He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father’s house, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.'” – Luke 16:19-28

“When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory. 32All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’ Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” – Matthew 25:46

And this much older passage says,

In the twelfth year, on the fifteenth day of the month, the word of Jehovah came to me: “Son of man, wail for the hordes of Egypt and consign to the earth below both her and the daughters of mighty nations, with those who go down to the pit. Say to them, ‘Are you more favored than others? Go down and be laid among the uncircumcised.’ They will fall among those killed by the sword. The sword is drawn; let her be dragged off with all her hordes. From within the grave the mighty leaders will say of Egypt and her allies, ‘They have come down and they lie with the uncircumcised, with those killed by the sword.’ Assyria is there with her whole army; she is surrounded by the graves of all her slain, all who have fallen by the sword. Their graves are in the depths of the pit and her army lies around her grave. All who had spread terror in the land of the living are slain, fallen by the sword. Elam is there, with all her hordes around her grave. All of them are slain, fallen by the sword. All who had spread terror in the land of the living went down uncircumcised to the earth below. They bear their shame with those who go down to the pit. A bed is made for her among the slain, with all her hordes around her grave. All of them are uncircumcised, killed by the sword. Because their terror had spread in the land of the living, they bear their shame with those who go down to the pit; they are laid among the slain. Meshech and Tubal are there, with all their hordes around their graves. All of them are uncircumcised, killed by the sword because they spread their terror in the land of the living. Do they not lie with the other uncircumcised warriors who have fallen, who went down to the grave with their weapons of war, whose swords were placed under their heads? The punishment for their sins rested on their bones, though the terror of these warriors had stalked through the land of the living. You too, O Pharaoh, will be broken and will lie among the uncircumcised, with those killed by the sword. Edom is there, her kings and all her princes; despite their power, they are laid with those killed by the sword. They lie with the uncircumcised, with those who go down to the pit. All the princes of the north and all the Sidonians are there; they went down with the slain in disgrace despite the terror caused by their power. They lie uncircumcised with those killed by the sword and bear their shame with those who go down to the pit. Pharaoh—he and all his army—will see them and he will be consoled for all his hordes that were killed by the sword, declares the Sovereign Jehovah. Although I had him spread terror in the land of the living, Pharaoh and all his hordes will be laid among the uncircumcised, with those killed by the sword, declares the Sovereign Jehovah.” – Ezekiel 32:17-32

Another ancient passage says:

From one New Moon to another and from one Sabbath to another, all mankind will come and bow down before me,” says Jehovah. “And they will go out and look upon the dead bodies of those who rebelled against me; their worm will not die, nor will their fire be quenched, and they will be loathsome to all mankind.” – Isaiah 66:23-24

So where did this heretic get “rebirth” out of eternal punishment? What a deceiving teacher this Punnett is, and shameful that as usual, he is still careless with his babble about the Bible despite me writing to him about his severe mistakes on the Bible long ago. Dr. Pommel also said soon after Ian’s nasty mistake that the people who return from their oobe’s come back more spiritual and less religious and are more in to reading the Bible and that “church is not as important” to them, all of these things, except for reading the Bible more, are more contrary to God, not more morally positive or “spiritually evolved” as some simpleton morons would say. This is because the Bible teaches that religion IS spiritual, which is true, because spiritual things are intangible, and much of the religion of Christianity is spiritual based: obeying good laws like refraining from making and worshiping imaginary gods, not lying, not stealing, not committing adultery, not murdering, loving your neighbor as yourself and which includes being forgiving. So this Dr., not surprising, is babbling when it comes to religion, and this is not surprising being that he does not have expertise in religion and is not very familiar with it, but rather with medicine and what those who’ve died have said about their experiences. It is apparent that at least some of these experiences are demonic illusions created around the SOUL (not spirit) of a person while it is out of their body (though not disconnected) to give them a false impression of what the real situation is concerning religion and God. This matches what the Bible says about deceiving demonic manifestations (which would include visions). For those who don’t know much about the Bible, you should also know that it says that Satan and his angels (demons) can appear as angels of light, in other words can look like the good angels.

A while after this Ian got a caller named Jim who informed Ian of his error about the Bible not talking about Hell much, and Jim made the mistake of going on about Jesus being the only way to Heaven rather than saying what Jesus said about Hell, as Ian then lowered the volume on the caller as he was speaking claiming that he (Ian) was talking about what people said about Hell after the Bible was written (which was a lie as that isn’t what Ian said), and that the caller was injecting descriptions about Hell which were not in the Bible, which was a lie as the caller didn’t give any descriptions that could be heard and Ian lowered the volume on him and spoke over him, and then Ian gave this alleged error the caller was making a technical theological name to sound like he was some scholar on the Bible, only briefly allowing the volume back at a normal level at which the caller asked something like, “You’re saying I’m describing Hell in the way the Bible doesn’t?” or at least that is what he meant. So Ian lied and used a bait and switch tactic: switching from his false claim that the Bible didn’t mention Hell much and the caller pointing out Jesus talked about it a lot, and then switching to a different subject: what people describe Hell as being like after the die. On top of that Ian didn’t say what the Bible says about Hell after implying that the caller’s (non)description was false. So tell us Ian Expert on the Bible With His Perfect Lense on the Bible and Life: what is the correct description? Tell us Great Judge Ian. But you didn’t, because you’re an ignorant idiot when it comes to the Bible and like every prideful fool, you resent being corrected.

Ian then smugly said that “maybe Jim shouldn’t read this book” because it doesn’t confirm that Jesus is the only way to Heaven and that Christians have the same experience as non-Christians (which implies that the book is evidence that the Bible is a lie, evidence that Jesus isn’t needed), and that our “lense” on life is important and then implied that that lense biases us, which is load of false claims, because,

1) that same lense would bias you too hypocrite Ian who denies with your lense comment that anyone but those who agree with your feelings and your lense can know the absolute truth (hypocrisy),

2) besides the Bible already being confirmed by all kinds of evidences as being true itself,

3) the book does not contain evidence that anyone who went to Heaven was allowed to stay, only an implication that some people had a choice, and yet at least one testimony the Dr. mentioned which slipped right over Ian’s head, was that one woman while out of her body was forced to go back in to care for her children;

4) Ian stereotyped all Christians!: Who said a Catholic is the same as a Calvinist?;

5) None of the testimony in the book said anything about God saying that Jesus was not needed to get to Heaven, not from the mouth of Jesus or God;

6) Ian was deceptive about what both non-Christians and Christians have said about what Hell is like when they experienced what they thought was it while out of their body. Ian was deceptive by being vague, and by being vague didn’t distinguish between misconptions of what Hell is like (like some people are so stupid they think they can have some kind of tormented fun / “rule in Hell” by tormenting others and bossing them around, and OOB descriptions of Hell, eye witness testimony that is, which DOES match the Bible’s description, except one case I remembered from Unsolved Mysteries, in which a mean-hearted atheist named Howard Storm had a vision of Hell or had gone there as he believed, and as a result (contrary to what Dr. Lommel said was the normal reaction: to become “more spiritual” (in some vague, nebulous way)), BECAME A CHRISTIAN MINISTER AS A RESULT! In old age Howard still repeated his testimony. Another example come from Bill Wiese, who became a fundamentalist Christian after experiencing what he believed was Hell, whom George Noory interviewed just last month! The show was on July 12, 2010. He called that segment of his show “23 minutes in Hell”, and what a surprise: George made fun of him and denied that Jesus could be the only way when the guest told him that (and big surprise too then that Ian, whom George protects so far as to pretend nothing happens when Ian blunders (obvious example which Ian joked about on a recent show, has the same outspoken hateful denial.) And just six months before that, George interviewed (again), a non-Christian named Glenn Kimball, who would vainly spend his money to study various ancient religious texts. Now this man Glenn was important to the staff of Coast to Coast AM because he was their first guest allegedly and a universalist like them. He was so loved by them that they did a tribute show to him and made sort of memorial to him on their Coast to Coast AM website coasttocoastam.com. Ian also did a tribute to him on a show. The coasttocoastam.com biography page on Glenn Kimball says:

Glenn Kimball has a B.A. in Journalism and an M.A. in Communications. In addition he has successfully completed all course work for a Ph.D. in Communications and passed his doctoral exams, lacking his dissertation. He was the former president of International Exchange School and vice president of two cellular phone companies. Glenn has taught school at Southern Illinois University and was ranked by student evaluations in the top ten instructors at the university. He has been collecting ancient texts since the age of fifteen and is famous for being able to integrate very diverse texts into a contiguous story line.

And there is more vain babble about him which disgusts me too much to put here. In his last interview, with George, Glenn

Now why does he matter?: because in his last interview, which George Noory performed, Glenn gave his testimony about his over 24 hours worth of experiencing Hell, saying that it was so bad that he wouldn’t wish the experience on anyone, AND GEORGE DID NOT MAKE FUN OF HIM, unlike how he treated the fundamentalist Christian. And Ian, not surprisingly, made no mention of this in his tribute. I wrote about this last interview with Glenn soon after it was made. George also did not bring up Glenn’s testimony again. How can they both be so conveniently forgetful? Even if Hell is merely a state of mind as George claimed, why would it still be nothing to mention? Are states of mind easy always easy change? When a person is sad let alone depressed, is it easy to just be happy as some shallow morons and “gurus” claim it is? NO, everyone knows that, even the morons who peddle their “just be happy, don’t worry” nonsense. Though the Bible says to think on that which is lovely and good, no doubt to help people break out of their sadness, worries and anger, it never treats any of those experiences as something you can just snap out of. So there are three testimonies which refute George and Ian and other universalists like them, again: Howard Storm, former atheist, to Glenn Kimball, a vain universalist like George and Ian have a spiritually ill love for, to Bill Wiese, a Calvinist.

7) Ian is probably thinking (or feeling rather) that the anti-Christian behavior of people after having had an OOBE is evidence against the Bible being fully true, but why would that be evidence against it? Were the people who saw the miracles of Jesus right to believe Jesus to be a liar after seeing the miracles, or right to side with the Pharisees out of fear of being put out of their church (synagogue)? NO! Like the Bible says, humans are desperately wicked and make mistakes, and simply leaving your body does not make you an automatic wise person on religion or so called “spirituality”, nor does seeing an angel, or a miracle or being helped by an angel.

Besides those things, Ian is being gullible and a simpleton, just believing whatever it is these oobe experiencers say, and making the very mistake he claimed Jim and other fundamentalist Christians make, which is injecting their own views and allowing their biased view to distort what they are seeing. Ian is a blind guide parroting cliche attacks that lack evidence and depth, and parroting them in hypocrisy. Ian was basically using the typical “point and making lying accusations without evidence with a calm confident tone” way of arguing. Ian, like many arrogant people, make the mistake of flattering themselves as being decent or good which includes reasonable and logical, and taking their belief in their decentness or goodness as evidence that they are truly decent or good, reasonable and logical, but a person’s mere belief in whatever it is they believe, is not evidence by itself that it is a correct belief.

Note: In one of the video testimonies of Howard Storm he said about humans: “you’re not that bad” which sounds like a contradiction to the rest of his testimony about how sins are so bad that people end up in Hell for them, but he may have mispoke and meant, “You’re not so bad that God can’t forgive you”. But such a statement is not accurate, as the Bible teaches that there is the possiblity of committing the unforgivable sin (to speak against the Holy Spirit), which God won’t forgive, and also there is a cut off point for forgiveness for people who hear the gospel and don’t respond to it or respond to it: if the hear but then despise Christianity, or if they half-heartedly respond (as in only act like a Christian but fail to actually become forgiven) and then abandon Christianity; like the unforgivable sin, there is no possiblity for forgiveness afterwards. I pointed out earlier in this post and on the one on Glenn Kimball, that some people even after seeing God’s wonders (that includes Hell), get worse, not better, and that includes people who become false versions of true Christians, who I’m sure will be among the ones on the Day of Judgment, who will ask God, “but didn’t I sit with you?”

Related Post:

Massive Amount of New Powerful Scientific Evidence of Souls, Life After Death, Angels, and for the Son of God

Odors of Sanctity, Visions and Healings by ‘Mary’ and Bleeding Saints

Last night and into the early morning George Noory, the main host of the Coast to Coast AM radio show, interviewed Kevin Cook author of Marian Apparitions, talking about visions of Mary and other various miracles that his guest no doubt wanted to use as evidence that the Catholic Church was a legitimate religion. George did a good job interviewing this time, and so made the show interesting.

Kevin claimed that he had had an inner calling in him while he was a Methodist pastor to become a Catholic (not that the Bible taught that Catholicism was the true religion) and so he became one because of that he implied. He said that he knew George Noory was a Catholic, and George immediately acknoweledged that he was right, in some way that I forget. Ironically George showed his anger at one caller who tried to raise fervor for the Catholic Church, telling him the show was about visions of Mary, not the Catholic Church.

Kevin brought up various miracles and Catholic prophets, and I knew that the usual would happen, which is that people would here this who were not saved and think that these were signs that the Catholic Church is or might the “true religion”. The problem with these miracles Kevin brought up, is that he himself acknoweldged that these Mary ghosts showed no concern for a true religion, but that she accepted anyone (which refutes Catholicism as being the true religion and shows the demonic nature of these Mary ghosts) and that the “miracle” of the smell of roses from no known source does’t just happen at Catholic churches or when Catholics are around, which eliminates the notion that it’s a Catholic only miracle. As for those who wonder if demons can heal, like I have for many years, they clearly can from what Revelation says, which is that the anti-Christ will receive a deadly head wound, but that it would be healed. So any healings that Catholics are able to perform or that seem to come from objects or places used in the Catholic religion should not cause anyone to wonder if Catholicism is the true religion. On top of that, the Bible said that the coming of the anti-Christ would come with demonic deceptions:

The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with the work of Satan displayed in all kinds miracles, signs and lying wonders, and in every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. – 2 Thessalonians 2:9-10

Notice the Bible there doesn’t say, “fake miracles, signs and wonders” meaning “man-made miracles or mistaken for miracles or demon-made but having no effect,” but instead says that they are “lying” as in they give people false information, for example the false implication that any religion except ones which are good in God’s eyes or that those who do as they please won’t be punished, except of course those who go against such a message (which would be the people of the true religion, the loved children of God).

The Bible also teaches in the Old Testament that God allows for the possiblity of prophecies that come true but which were falsely claimed to have come from Him or from a false god, and that he does this to test people (to condemn or justify them in other words), to reveal if they are faithful to him or merely following their own heart ultimately. So, no one should be afraid when a Catholic makes a successful prophecy, especially not a vague one.

Another warning sign that these miracles are of Satan, is that the Catholic Church won’t reveal what this so called final (third) secret of Fatima is, which apparently is that it will be a perpetrator of child abuse: http://catholicism.about.com/b/2010/05/14/the-third-secret-of-fatima-and-clerical-sexual-abuse.htm. Ironically that page, which is propaganda, which attempts to legitamize the Catholic Church though showing that the Pope danced around the issue of the third “secret” deceptively, refutes Catholicism by implying that the forgiveness of priests does not atone for anyone’s sins, that justice has not been satisfied.

Before that show, Art Bell did a show, and said, “It’s okay to attack someone’s beliefs… to attack their data… but when you attack their character, that’s another story.” That is a deceptive and immoral statement because it is obvious that attacking a belief or data (as if it were a lie and not good) without evidence, is considered to be a crime of harassment, and in a way it is an attack against the character of the one who has the beliefs being attacked, and, Art’s statement implies that you may not rebuke a person for being thief, liar, adulterer, fornicator, idolator, rebel or murderer, which would mean we should all allow people commit repeat crimes to get away with their crimes without justice.

Art Bell and the False Flood Prophet, “Doctor” Peter Ward aka “Screed”

The global warming hysteria continues: Tonight and into the morning Art Bell of Coast to Coast AM has on a ranting grand liberal poobah moron named Peter Douglas Ward (2) (3). Peter Ward is a narcissistic fruity mainstream scientist and a bigot. Besides laughing hysterically at things that aren’t funny, he indirectly implies that scientists are only people who practice science (which most likely is the stereotypical lie of what scientists are: people who experiment with “natural sciences”) and that no creationists are scientists and that scientists who don’t believe in global warming are not scientists. What he is implying is like someone implying that blacks are inferior to whites, or that blacks can’t be scientists, it’s similar because both are discrimination not based on evidence, and therefore hateful. Peter was also pushing the over population myth, claiming that the world’s population must go in reverse in order to raise everyone’s standard of living, which is circular reasoning. His reasoning goes like this:

“The population must be reduced to raise the standard of living, the standard of living must raise by lowering the population.” There is no evidence in the statement. Further, he said, “Everyone has the right to have a high standard of living.” Says who? Who made you God Peter? What is the evidence for this claims? Peter, obey the Bible which says to ask the rich to be generous to the poor, and which teaches the rich to use their money to help the needy, not kill “the burden of these extra mouths” as you said.

Peter also made the crazy statement on this show that increasing carbon dioxide would reduce plant growth, specifically, crops. Uh Peter the “scientists”, the “professor”: plants become healthier and grow better with carbon dioxide. No one has ever shown a crop dying from too much carbon dioxide. No marijuana plant has ever died from too march carbon dioxide. You’re deluded, your common sense buried under a flood of delusions just as God once flooded the world and buried it’s wisdom, so yours is deep under lies, covered in oil.

Art Bell is pandering to this moron as I write this, and earlier on this same show pretentiously claimed that he could understand why certain people were denying Global Warming, which was that it was for political reasons or they were tied into an oil company, but not for the average person, but just a few minutes earlier said that it was because people didn’t want to change their life style and so were in denial, which was evidence that he was pandering and making up stuff like a little kid as he went along. Art Bell, also on this show, said, “People just don’t like change”, an obviously false comment, which he seems to have noticed as he then tried to qualify it by saying, “they don’t like negative change.” Art then made the rhetorical question (and Peter chimed in after) “in there’s an infinite supply of oil” then “why are we drilling” “in dangerous places” to get oil and straining to get it. Here stupid: BECAUSE THE POPULATION OF THE PLANET KEEPS GROWING. You can’t support a planet full of people on one oil well you idiot. And who said it was infinite you liar? Though the Bible does imply that it will last a long time since it prophecied that the children of Ishmael (the Arabs) would make their profit from the blood of the earth (and live by war). Peter also agreed with Art’s reasoning parroting the same type of rhetorical question and also asked why people were using coal when it was easier to turn oil into electricity. Easy: To create more jobs, and because the U.S. government doesn’t always make it easy to drill for oil, and bans various people from drilling or pays them not to. There are national parks with oil but you can’t drill for it and there are environmentalists constantly trying to make it illegal for people to drill for oil in certain places, that includes on dry land, like in Alaska. Further, it’s not as simple as you try to make it seem: not everyone has easy access to oil, like South Africa, so they convert their coal to oil. Further, the cost simply isn’t in the conversion of coal or oil to electricity, there is also the cost of drilling and digging, and depending on the location of the coal and oil, it can be more or less expensive. Further, countries are constantly in a struggle with being energy independent or taking money from various energy companies to take their energy instead (for example the U.S.A. relies heavily on oil from the Middle East because of “price wars” and that includes using bribes).

Oil supplies are also used like weapon (besides being used to run weaponized machinery), for example you can flood a market with it at low prices to lower its price and by doing so lower the income those profiting from it. So if a country that was relying on oil from another country decided to hurt that country, or the oil company they were relying on, they would go exploring for oil, and after finding it, use it for themselves and sell it themselves. And you use coal for war too. Which reminds me: Germany also relied heavily on coal during WWII, converting it to oil and Japan went to war with America over President F.D.R. withholding it from them.

Here’s some advice for you Art: stop ranting, stop being mentally lazy by resorting to stupid cliches, CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH.

Also misleading about Peter’s comment on oil being easier to convert to electricity to coal was that he didn’t mention that oil isn’t simply used for energy (and neither is coal when it is converted to oil only used for energy). It’s used for many other things other than energy, including vaseline.

I can see and hear why Peter is being used as a front for evolution and Big Bang propaganda: he has an appearance of wisdom (physically and from his educational record), but sounds like a liberal 2o-year-old. If only he would accept the fact that his head puppeteers, the rich globalists with the help of their fanatical nature worshipers (hippies), manipulate his anti-petrol propaganda in an attempt to get rid of the middle class, destroy Christianity, and keep third world countries poor and easy to take advantage of.

There is another Peter Ward, a “Peter L. Ward”  of Teton Tectonics who claims that the main cause of global warming is sulfur dioxide from volcanic eruptions, and uses the mythical evidence from the mythical time from before 6,500 years ago as evidence.

I have a message specifically for you Peter:

You said on Coast to Coast AM this morning, when asked by a caller how oil got down thousands of miles deep below the earth into the ocean if it was from plants, simply repeated, WITHOUT EVIDENCE, that it was from plants that were under great pressure. Peter how does that answer how the plants got down there? You didn’t answer the question, you bullshitted because you had no answer. You basically said, “It just is.” So who has the “God of the Gaps”, who is teaching anti-science Mr. It Just Is. Plants get eaten by bacteria and weathered away and burned away for fuel, they don’t magically pile up and rot into oil anymore than the plants of today do.

The Bible is true as is clear from the evidence: http://20questions.tk (scroll down to the links). You would be aware of this if you weren’t always dwelling on yourself and how you feel about things. As you are supposed to remember: truth is not determined by how you personally feel about it. You can talk all day long about the Earth being underwater, but God already flooded it, as you can see, as anyone can see from the jumble of sea fossils scattered all over the world’s dry land masses, including on the tops of mountains. There is no nice neat organized strata showing an imaginary steady gradual evolution from little “primitive” crystal fairy beings to “big advanced complex” beings. That’s all in your head, which you’ve chosen to fill with fanciful delusions. You are the absurd one to pretend TO SAY THAT YOU SPEAK FOR ALL SCIENTISTS IN YOUR FIELD LET ALONE ALL SCIENTISTS, that is a narcissist talking, not someone who is mentally sound. Who the Hell are you Mr. Liberal Friends Gave Me Fancy Sounding Degrees, to say a creationist isn’t a scientist or that a Christian is not one? Or that “bigger is righter”? What a fool, ignoring the obvious so that you can have fun getting everyone to listen to your drama queenery. “Oh look everyone the world is flooding, oh don’t believe that God Bible man in the sky which said the world could be flooded, that’s fairy toilet paper, but listen to us modern day evolutionist atheists and anti-Christian theists who were the only scientists and came up with all the inventions in the world and are non stop charities (yeah right): the world’s gonna be flooded again!” Is that what God reveals in any prophecies in Revelation? No. But what does it say after the flood occurred: THAT GOD WOULD NOT FLOOD THE WORLD AGAIN AND THAT THE RAINBOW WOULD BE A CONSTANT SIGN OF THIS. MAN IS NOT IN CONTROL OF THE WORLD: GOD IS. And wow, so you know what happened billions of years ago, 15 billion huh? But we Christians are the absurd ones for believing what happened 6,500? Insane much? Backwards much? You’re backwards. The primitive one is you and those who think backwards like you, who accuse others of the very hypocrisy you resort to just to look right, despite being an obvious liar. Listen to God false prophet, not your feelings. He made it convenient for you to learn what he taught, but you come up with every and any arbitrary excuse not to study. “Waaaah, I have to learn more after getting a thorough brainwashing from my evolutionist friends?! No thanks Daniel Knight I’ll stick with my way! No one can change my beliefs!” Yes, I know you’re a religious fanatic, what about it? How can someone with so many degrees be ignoring so much evidence against his insane ranting? You’re corrupt. You should have learned logic and studied morality and religion: life is not livable no matter how many numbers you fill your head with and no matter how many physics facts you learn, if you forget logic and moral laws. The scientific method is not a substitute for do not lie at all It’s not a commandment warning people about the danger of Hell. And if it helps, read Judges, and see if you can spot where it reveals the scientific method. And if it makes you feel any better, God made everyone a scientists. You’re not the only one who 1) Imagines 2) Tries 3) Tries again 4) Gives up or succeeds. That’s programmed into us all genius. Did you know that? Maybe if you weren’t so busy playing follow-my-liberal-feelings-preacher you would have noticed that Mr. I’m a Scientist Haha You’re Not. And Peter, you said you would take on arguments against global warming, why then did you reply with “that’s just a load of crap”, “that’s screed” when you were told that the eugenics movement was apart of the depopulation movement you’re supporting? You’re a liar. And what a hypocrite and weasel: You said on Art’s show this morning that the booing you got from creationists when you spoke scared your eight-year-old, awww poor you and poor eight-year-old, what about the millions of Christian kids murdered by the pagans of Rome, then millions more by the Catholics of Rome, then many millions more and more than just Christians killed by atheists in the name of “progress” and using “evolution” as justification? What about the endless bullying of Christians in atheist dominated countries like China, Russia and it’s former states and Vietnam, the endless tortures and imprisonments and enslaving of Christians in those countries? What about the babies you encourage mothers to murder in their womb, cut up without anesthetics? But yeah: poor you, you got booed when you spoke to endorse TORTURE, BULLYING, AND MURDER OF KIDS, OF BABIES EVEN, and your kid was scared. If you had taught your kid to fear God, and not you, then he wouldn’t have feared his idol dad being boed. What a self-centered, insulting, arrogant, hateful, ignorant wimp. You’re a babbling, gullible sophist, not a professor, and not a “Doctor” as Art and others pretentiously call you.

Learn more about broken logic here: http://circularreasoning.tk if you’d like and why it is false that the universe and Earth are older than 6,500 years, why the radiometric dating you rely on is false evidence.

Update:

I asked Peter to fulfill his claim on taking on anti-global warming arguments. Here was my letter to him:

[On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Daniel Knight wrote:]
You said you would take on the anti-global warming arguments, can you
take on the one here?: http://artbell.tk

What answer could you possibly give other than, “Oh.” ?

As for email being the most hateful form of communication? Is that some
science based claim or your opinion?

God bless you.

And here was his hypocritical, bigoted biased reply:

There is no god.  Wake up.

Professor Peter D Ward
Dept of Biology
The University of Washington
Seattle, 98195
206-543-2962  ( Office )

In other words, this hypocrite atheist sent me the very hate mail he complained about, all because I asked God to bless him. In other words, he booed me for blessing him, but was perfectly happy to accept Art Bell’s, who has emphatically stated that he doesn’t believe in the Big Bang Theory. Someone that gets as easily upset as Ward, isn’t going to have the mental stamina to know much truth, especially if they spend their time obsessing on controlling what others think and say.

“This only have I found: God made mankind upright, but men have gone in search of many schemes.” – Ecclesiastes 7:29

Jeff Kripal and Other Authors of Impossible Stupidity

Jeffrey Kripal, Chair of the Department of Religious Studies at Rice University, is a typical mainstream moron, but extra smug as could be heard with his disgusting attitude towards religious persons, especially Christians on Coast to Coast AM tonight. This person heard from George Knapp that religious persons don’t have a problem accepting the reality of UFO’s, and I as a fundamentalist Christian, a Calvinist, don’t and easily accept them, yet this snot ass Jeffrey Crippled Brain merely used some narcissistic babble with a smug attitude to dismiss their acceptance, saying he had a hard time believing it: WELL DUMB ASS HOW CAN YOU BE A PROFESSOR OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES IF YOU DIDN’T BOTHER ASKING ANY RELIGIOUS PERSON WHAT THEY THOUGHT ABOUT UFO’S OR BOTHERED TO READ ABOUT WHAT THEY THOUGHT ABOUT THEM? And what moron hasn’t heard that the Catholic Church has said that aliens are also God’s creatures? Jeff, on Coast to Coast used Ezekiel as an example of UDOs in the Bible, showing how this conniving worm and weasel is a typical idiot who simply takes the Bible out of context arbitrary to make it fit his hatred of God. There is NO EVIDENCE that Ezekiel saw a UFO. And Jeff even acknowledged that by using the cliche IF WE COULD PROVE, WELL YOU CAN’T SMUG ARROGANT ONE, SO WHY ARE YOU SAYING “IF”? What a stupid childish God-hating brat. IF IF IF IF IF IF, WHO CARES ABOUT “IFS”?, THE POINT IS WHAT DOES THE EVIDENCE SHOW, WHAT DOES THE TRUTH SHOW. This moron also can’t even define words like paranormal right, or rather refuses to. This person thinks that people who can contact the dead are proof that the Bible and religion isn’t needed. HUH???????! IN OTHER WORDS: GHOSTS TELL ALL AND KNOW ALL AND PEOPLE WHO CAN TALK TO THE DEAD CAN TALK TO GOD. What the HELL? How can a “professor” of religion say such obviously demented crazed wrong stupidity? Since when do ghosts or any thing on “the other side” tell everyone whatever they want to know? What a stupid turd brain. Jerk time waster. And who in the world but a small group of crazed morons claim to be able to talk to God, oh wait there are a bunch of crazed Christians who make that claim, AND THE ENTIRE BIBLE CLAIMS TO BE FROM GOD, NOW HOW IN THE WORLD DID THAT GO RIGHT OVER MR. PROFESSOR OF RELIGION’S HEAD? So everything but the Bible counts. This moron also said that what mediums and psychics say “ARE NOT 100% RELIABLE BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION” and notice the narcissistic cliche phrase “by any stretch of the imagination”? God forbid the moron talk simply, because that might mean he’s a simpleton. This guy in other words is A MORON, HE GOT HIS JOB WRONGFULLY AND HAS NO BUSINESS BEING CALLED A PROFESSOR OF RELIGION OR CLAIMING TO BE ONE. He’s a person who contradicts himself and refuses to accept facts concerning religion, and indirectly calls you a liar to your face if you are a religious person, and most disgusting of all, with a smug attitude, as if his personal self assurance is evidence in and of itself that he is right, and that is a mistake that many religious people also make, and yet he pretends to be above them. Hypocrites them all!

On top of all that, how in the Hell is this moron’s book original or contributing anything? So no one RELIGIOUS HAS ALREADY GIVEN THEIR PERSPECTIVE? Not Kyle Ain on youtube? UH YEAH HE DID TWO YEARS AGO AND IT’S STILL THERE AND IS EXTENSIVE. But Jeff wants in on the fame so he puts out smug babble and rehash thinking he is someone just because his friends gave him a title and degrees. Get lost you bitter jealous skeptical jerk.

And I have to go back his claim that if you can talk to the dead you can talk to God and can know all there is to know. WHAT IDIOT DOESN’T KNOW THAT TO BE FALSE??? Anyone ever heard of anyone knowing everything just because they could talk to a spirit? Does anyone in the Bible make that claim, Moses even? NO, A MASSIVE NO. So what the Hell is this person talking about? What demon, what angel, has given us the history of the world and good laws like don’t lie, don’t steal, don’t murder and don’t commit adultery and love your neighbor as yourself and enemies? NONE! What angel has given us prophecy after prophecy that could be confirmed like the ones in the Bible? NONE, not even Nostradamus comes close because his is in code form if sensible at all. Why does this profressor dismiss the Bible as “stuff about UFOs and aliens”? Oh, he can’t because he said himself “if we could prove”. And NO ONE CAN OBVIOUSLY SO WHY IS HE BOTHERING TO SAY THAT? What a stupid HATEFUL moron! Why doesn’t he take into account the Shroud of Turin, or the many miracles that happen today? This guy can’t keep his story straight, he won’t say what he believes, just makes vague babble and laughs. I can’t stand people like that. He is the type of mentally ill person the Bible warns to avoid: A QUESTION-HANKERER, in other words a person who takes joy in questions and is addicted to questioning, thinking it makes them wise to babble on and on asking questions and saying, “We’re still learning” as is typical of God-haters WHO DON’T WANT TO ACCEPT THE ANSWER NO MATTER HOW APPARENT NO MATTER HOW OBVIOUS. And yet this person acts self-assured that no one else can know the truth but him. Contradictory moron Jeff you can’t claim to know the truth while claiming know one else can. How can you know the truth while claiming no one else can know it? Jeff is of the group that believes “THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE TRUTH”, which is A CONTRADICTION. No Jeff, you can’t know every single thing, but you can know the Bible is true and that just because you FEEL that Ezekiel saw UFOs, doesn’t mean the Bible isn’t true. You don’t dismiss thousands of years of work because OMG you feel someone saw flying saucers, but oh, can’t prove it.

According to Jeff, as he said on Coast to Coast AM, because one priest considered UFO’s demonic, that that is why he skeptical about “religion” (that is the word he used) being able to handle UFOs and aliens. And yet this asshole snickered when Knapp told him that three religious persons had no problem accepting it. So one Catholic priest = “why I am a smug asshole and hate religious people and don’t take them at their word and stereotype them all” is all the proof he needs, but three mean nothing and are really lying, cuz, uh, cuz Jeff snickered and is a skeptic, and skeptics are cool and know everything because they can talk to ghosts, uh, yeah. No crack pottery there. Jeff you’re a jerk, you are the definition of biased, jerk and bigot and the type of person religious people would love to punch into a pulp for being a snot.

According to Jeff on Coast to Coast AM, this book was made to give the paranormal a serious treatment in an artistic way, and that he “frames the paranormal as sacred”. If that isn’t the babble of a self-centered narcissist what is? So Mr. Professor of Religion Jeff Kripal is the first person to treat the subject with seriousness? You mean the Bible hasn’t? You mean the Bible isn’t artistic? You mean no religion has taken “the paranormal” seriously? Why does Jeff act like paranormal means something other than supernatural or miraculous? Typical liberal who arrogantly thinks that because he’s read a lot, that he knows and understands enough to be a teacher about religion, yet is clearly such an ignorant and forgetful person that he can’t even remember what “paranormal” means, while often babbling about it!

And Jeff, go ask a ghost to tell you if Ezekiel saw a UFO or not, and what UFOs are. Oh you mean they didn’t and won’t tell you anything believable? So much for not needing the Bible and “sacred ghosts”.

Don’t give this arrogant fraud your money, let him get a job and work for it. He’s better suited to breaking open peanut shells in a dark room where he can’t annoy the Hell out of anyone with his, “Well I have a hard time believing that cuz me is a professor of religion according to me liberal friends” attitude.

Unholy Ian Punnett and Monica Holy: Two Confused ”New Age” Teachers

Tonight, the heretic Ian Punnett had on an “afterlife paramedic” named Monica, who said that “on the other side” (some vague place where spirits can be seen) “there is no right, there is no wrong” and that “there’s an equal shift of giving and receiving”. So it’s not wrong to lie or steal or abuse anyone, and of course, stereotypical meaningless vague New Age babble about giving and receiving stuff in equal amounts. It’s a common tactic of Satan to try and comfort people by talking about “balance” and “equality” and being vague about what is meant and avoiding specific details, the idea being to make it harder for people to spot obvious contradictions. It would be like a liberal saying, “Children are equal to adults” and not saying in what way or literally meaning what they said. Monica might as well have said, “Everything is equal”, which would have been just as false and without evidence.

Ian asked her if there was a maleveolant force, and she said that she’d experienced “various dark energies in various forms”. Yet more vaguenes with no reference to Satan or other demons. She didn’t say, “Yes I saw a bad person” or “bad being” or “evil”, which would have directly contradicted her statement about there being no right or wrong, so she used the vague word, “negative”, a word which weasels (like fake Christians and anti-Christians) often use in place of “evil”, “wrong” and “bad” in order to avoid being being accused of “judging” or “condemning”. False Christians will also use “Satanic” in addition to “negative”. It stems from their hatred, ironically, of God’s laws, which also ironic, is a Satanic attitude itself, and definitely “negative”.

At about 1:12 A.M. (mountain time), after I had written the above: Almost immediately after a commercial break, Monica told Ian, “I found… an equilibrium” and a few seconds after that she’d encountered a “negative energy” and called it “an equilibrium setting”. Just as I said, “equality” is used as a catch word (by such non-Christians).

1:27 AM: More narcissist, word salad New Age babble from Monica: After being asked by Ian if there was a Heaven or Hell, she gave the cliche, “I believe Hell is of our own making… it really is… there’s different levels of frequency where emotions are concerned… there’s vibrating… there’s lower frequency emotions.” Again, it’s also a typical tactic of Satan to use “high words” that people don’t understand, and applying them in ways that make them seem understandable but are vague and nonsensical, and then getting other ignoramuses to repeat them in those wrong ways, and worse, which inflates their pride because they think they are saying something profound and wise. George Noory does it when he uses the word “dimensional” in a sentence like, “Are these beings dimensional or are they physical” which makes an illogical contrast between dimensional and physical, as if they were opposite and incompatible things, when they are not. Dimensional simply means,
having dimensions” not “spiritual” or “from another universe” or
from another dimension (that we can’t perceive)” as George incorrectly implies it means.

It’s really sad that so many people are confused like this and buy into the kind of nonsense that Ian, George and Monica put out, and wor3savesave resse, binds people more greatly on their way to Hell.

At about 1:48, Monica said that she believed that people chose to be born in their circumstances (for example homeless or disabled), and Ian replied, I find the idea of predestination very Calvinist, it’s very old school, I don’t know if I can accept that. Ian’s complaint was absurd and nonsensical since Monica was saying that we with out will were choosing our circumstance before hand, not “God does”. That is just another example of how stupid and ignorant and nonseniscal Ian’s reasoning is when it comes to anything that has to do with religion in general. He’s clearly, to those who can see, spiritually blind.

It would have been appropriate however, if Ian had asked Monica, “So you’re saying that if a little kid is sexuallyy abused, it’s okay, because they wanted to be sexually abused? Or if someone is raped it’s not really raped because they wanted to have sex?” So Monica not only has said that there is no right or wrong wherever it is she believes that spirits exist, but has also implied that there is no right or wrong where physical beings exist. Yet more justification criminal behavior.

Monica also said that dogs can see the “infrared plane” and that she had heard that it was a plane (as in a spiritual plane of existance). The infrared is actually a form of light, not a place or plane. Ian shamefully didn’t correct her, or was ignorant about this too. “Plane” is another one of those catch words that ignorant people fancy using, especially those who regard themselves as “spiritual”. To say “plane” in reference to spiritual places seems to me to be a Dungeons and Dragons invention, a fancy word in place of “place”. It’s also nonsensical since it implies that spiritual places are flat, or have flat surfaces. It reminds me of people who supposedly believed that Earth was flat. No surprise that make-believe books are part of the source of such New Age beliefs.

Smug Ian Punnett Spoils the ”Lost” TV Series for Millions of C2C AM Listeners

Yesteday night on Coast to Coast, the host, the awful Ian Punnett, a false Christian, decided to let loose again with his heart and mind to let millions of people know what he was thinking, and right away, spoiled th plot of the very popular TV series, Lost, which I had been hard at work trying to watch. After having spent many weeks trying, I was very disappointed to hear him give the main point away, especially since I’ve been waiting a very long time to watch something original. Ian Punnet, you are a careless, self righteous idiot, jerk, hypocrite, and snorting moron. Ian is so stupid such a stupid fake Christian, that he confidently stated, that the KJV Bible is not a good translation, and that the Bible no where forbids homosexuality, and yet he proudly allows himself to be used as and considered to be a teacher and scholar of the Bible, because, wow: he graduated from a seminary, as if any and every one was  good.