Archive

Posts Tagged ‘climate change’

Saving The Oceans by Reclaiming Spilled Fuel and Annhilating the ‘Great Island of Trash’

August 12, 2019 Leave a comment

For a very long time, about twenty five years I have on and off studied alternative physics, energy, propulsion and all kinds of other things. Because my brain cannot process math correctly at a normal rate or well compared to most people (I have dyscalculia, numerical dyslexia) I must rely on other logical methods of deduction to determine if what I’m reading or not is true, including identifying biased statements, empty claims/baseless statements and accepted claims. It’s no different then how one would judge if some car was good or not. I was as are many fascinated by claims of “free energy” and “antigravity” and alternative theories to Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, aether/ether theories, what photons and electrons might truly be and how gravity and magnetism truly work. Eventually I did discover some miraculous-like technology which had been mostly overlooked for the wrong reasons. Many people including their inventors made bad judgments and due to a lack of good, helpful friends and promotion and a lack of money did not get far. Their inventions either were mostly forgotten or have remained in extreme obscurity. It’s also due to the “media”/news reporters going with more sensational stories day after day and relentless competition and many being overloaded with work, tending to their family, friends or pets, or their health, or distracted with addictions and lusts, that these revolutionary concepts and inventions ended up in perpetual obscurity.

Consider the Antikythera Device which is said to be 1000-2000 years ahead of its time. For the usual reasons in life, including thefts, jealousies, “idea theft” aka “intellectual property theft”, business sabotage, wars, false religions, bad government, diseases, and on and on, the inventors and this combination of inventions never evolved into anything more till it was rediscovered, and by that time there was nothing useful to be learned by it, it had literally become outdated. It did however further make clear that atheism-based (anthropological, archaeological and evolutionary) science (so called “mainstream science) was completely wrong regarding how mankind came about. Like the Piri Reis Map it was irrifutable evidence that evolutionist and Big Bang timelines did not (and cannot) match the technological development rate of mankind. They do not sync up in otherwords with the “stupid cave men/monkeys dragging females by their hair” and only becoming intelligent when Galileo claimed Earth wasn’t at the center of the universe and Darwin claiming we came from animals or when in 1924, Russian biochemist Alexander Oparin theorized that living things came from chemical reactions of dead things. No, some of the oldest Egyptian pyramids were built around 2630 B.C., and Biblical literature, the Book of Genesis, was written more than 3,200 years ago, the famous Mitchell Hodges skull perhaps created in Idar Oberstein, Germany around 1800, using lapidary technology that was invented in at least the early 1400s, the microscope and telescope were invented from 1590-1650, Minoan’s were at least 1,400 years more technologically advanced than the Romans and the Romans had surgical technology equal to 18th and 19th century technology (1,800 years more advanced than the rest of the world. There are other engineering feats of extreme yet unknown age, 1000s of years old, feats showing the ability to carve, move and build with stone blocks weighing 140 tons to one kiloton. At Göbekli Tepe, one of tbe first stone built cities or worship sites to be built after Noah’s Flood (or perhaps soon after the construction of the Tower of Babel was stopped), already showed mankind was moving 50 ton blocks of stone. In ancient Egypt and India there was also advanced drilling technology and super advanced stone-cutting technology, anywhere from 4000 to 700 years more advanced than modern drilling and cutting technology and techniques, which only until these years may finally have been understood. The most famous lost ancient technology is Damascus Steel, there is even a lost ancient Chinese sword-making method that was copied by the Japanese and a Japanese man recently recreated this same or similar lost art. There were also super strong knives made in modern times, but the inventor died without letting anyone know how he made them, I cannot remember his name and Google disappointingly does not mention him anymore when doing a search for “world’s hardest knives” or “toughest” or “strongest” even with “antiques”. The inventor then has quickly disappeared from public knowledge and only very knowledgeable knife collectors would then know his name. So, consider the 100% reality that mankind creates advance technologies, ignores, overlooks or even destroys them out of incompitence, jealousy, pride, competition/greed and ignorance.

Now after pointing this out want to tell everyone that I discovered of a combination of cheap technologies that would completely eliminate pollution from gas and diesel engines and even the super-polluting smog caused by combusting “bunker fuel” (sulphur-heavy fuel) burned by mass cargo ocean transport ships/mass cargo vessels. To make and implement them is much cheaper and much more effective then hydrogen engines, catalytic converters and scrubbers. This combination of technologies could also use methane converted to liquid gas. What’s most astonishing is that the world’s oceans could be cleaned up of all the toxic fuel and chemicals being spilled into and leaking into the rivers and oceans of the world, rapidly, without having to filter out the water. For example the polluted Ganges River and shores of Nigeria, especially at Bodo could quickly be cleaned and the siphoned pollution used as fuel and “burned up” without any toxic emissions. Total fuel costs for all petrol-burning vehicles, trucks, ships and turbo-prop planes could be reduced by 30-80%, in my opinion, possibly 95%.

Being that I must make a living as much as anyone else, am selling what I know, and so I may go into business by manufacturing and using these technologies myself. My knowledge will not come cheap, as for each person who wishes to know must pay a $475,500 down payment, and they must sign a non-disclosure contract. I advise anyone who wishes to use what I know to secure manufacturing contracts for the tech I will disclose to you. Once I have obtained approximately $100 million in purchases will attempt to develop and manufacture the necessary technologies myself. To ignore what I know will be a disgrace to the world. My offer is very cheap for saving the world’s rivers, oceana, ground water, human and animal life. I am especially concerned for the Ganges River dolphin and the food they rely on, they are almost extinct and the Nigerians of Bodo who are living on small contaminated snails and polluted fish and living on land polluted with crude oil.

Most Americans I imagine will think, “Who cares about Nigeria and some dolphins and pathetic India’s dirty creek? What about making profitable jobs for Americans?” To such a complaint, consider the Taylor Oil Spill Disaster which could last for hundreds of years if not stopped.  Under my business plan I would continually suck up the polluted sea water to be reused as fuel without the need for seperating the petrol from the water. It would be resold cheaper than sulphur laden oil which is the lowest grade of bulk fuel used by marine shipping companies cargo container ships.

HHO Fuel-Saving Device 1 - cheetalynx@gmail.com

HHO Fuel-Saving Device 1 – cheetalynx@gmail.com

I also intend to create a business of ever expanding trash collecting ships which will float over and by floating the Great Pacific Garbage Patch and atomize it, as in safely and efficiently reducing it to tiny harmless particles. It will be sustainable from the waste oil collected from spill sites and the toxic chemicals siphoned from the Ganges River. The process by which the trash is atomized (destroyed) will also greatly reduce any radioactive waste. Now that truly will help the world. Who wants radioactive waste washing up at the beech? I also suspect one of the technologies I discovered will make using shale oil less dangerous and costly.

If you would like to donate to me or purchase information regarding the obscure technologies I’ve discovered, donate or pay to my paypal email.

If you want to promote yourself of business by donating, donate at least $50 directly to my bank acount and I will link to you on the bottom of this article. And so the world knows, those donating to me does not mean they believe everything or I do, so don’t accuse my donors of supporting evil, hate or lies, listen to your own wordly advice: don’t be negative, don’t judge, be loving. Or, as Jesus said (who is God according to John chapter 1), “As you want done to you, so do others.” Isn’t that the most valuable advice of all time?

Art Bell and the False Flood Prophet, “Doctor” Peter Ward aka “Screed”

July 24, 2010 5 comments

The global warming hysteria continues: Tonight and into the morning Art Bell of Coast to Coast AM has on a ranting grand liberal poobah moron named Peter Douglas Ward (2) (3). Peter Ward is a narcissistic fruity mainstream scientist and a bigot. Besides laughing hysterically at things that aren’t funny, he indirectly implies that scientists are only people who practice science (which most likely is the stereotypical lie of what scientists are: people who experiment with “natural sciences”) and that no creationists are scientists and that scientists who don’t believe in global warming are not scientists. What he is implying is like someone implying that blacks are inferior to whites, or that blacks can’t be scientists, it’s similar because both are discrimination not based on evidence, and therefore hateful. Peter was also pushing the over population myth, claiming that the world’s population must go in reverse in order to raise everyone’s standard of living, which is circular reasoning. His reasoning goes like this:

“The population must be reduced to raise the standard of living, the standard of living must raise by lowering the population.” There is no evidence in the statement. Further, he said, “Everyone has the right to have a high standard of living.” Says who? Who made you God Peter? What is the evidence for this claims? Peter, obey the Bible which says to ask the rich to be generous to the poor, and which teaches the rich to use their money to help the needy, not kill “the burden of these extra mouths” as you said.

Peter also made the crazy statement on this show that increasing carbon dioxide would reduce plant growth, specifically, crops. Uh Peter the “scientists”, the “professor”: plants become healthier and grow better with carbon dioxide. No one has ever shown a crop dying from too much carbon dioxide. No marijuana plant has ever died from too march carbon dioxide. You’re deluded, your common sense buried under a flood of delusions just as God once flooded the world and buried it’s wisdom, so yours is deep under lies, covered in oil.

Art Bell is pandering to this moron as I write this, and earlier on this same show pretentiously claimed that he could understand why certain people were denying Global Warming, which was that it was for political reasons or they were tied into an oil company, but not for the average person, but just a few minutes earlier said that it was because people didn’t want to change their life style and so were in denial, which was evidence that he was pandering and making up stuff like a little kid as he went along. Art Bell, also on this show, said, “People just don’t like change”, an obviously false comment, which he seems to have noticed as he then tried to qualify it by saying, “they don’t like negative change.” Art then made the rhetorical question (and Peter chimed in after) “in there’s an infinite supply of oil” then “why are we drilling” “in dangerous places” to get oil and straining to get it. Here stupid: BECAUSE THE POPULATION OF THE PLANET KEEPS GROWING. You can’t support a planet full of people on one oil well you idiot. And who said it was infinite you liar? Though the Bible does imply that it will last a long time since it prophecied that the children of Ishmael (the Arabs) would make their profit from the blood of the earth (and live by war). Peter also agreed with Art’s reasoning parroting the same type of rhetorical question and also asked why people were using coal when it was easier to turn oil into electricity. Easy: To create more jobs, and because the U.S. government doesn’t always make it easy to drill for oil, and bans various people from drilling or pays them not to. There are national parks with oil but you can’t drill for it and there are environmentalists constantly trying to make it illegal for people to drill for oil in certain places, that includes on dry land, like in Alaska. Further, it’s not as simple as you try to make it seem: not everyone has easy access to oil, like South Africa, so they convert their coal to oil. Further, the cost simply isn’t in the conversion of coal or oil to electricity, there is also the cost of drilling and digging, and depending on the location of the coal and oil, it can be more or less expensive. Further, countries are constantly in a struggle with being energy independent or taking money from various energy companies to take their energy instead (for example the U.S.A. relies heavily on oil from the Middle East because of “price wars” and that includes using bribes).

Oil supplies are also used like weapon (besides being used to run weaponized machinery), for example you can flood a market with it at low prices to lower its price and by doing so lower the income those profiting from it. So if a country that was relying on oil from another country decided to hurt that country, or the oil company they were relying on, they would go exploring for oil, and after finding it, use it for themselves and sell it themselves. And you use coal for war too. Which reminds me: Germany also relied heavily on coal during WWII, converting it to oil and Japan went to war with America over President F.D.R. withholding it from them.

Here’s some advice for you Art: stop ranting, stop being mentally lazy by resorting to stupid cliches, CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH.

Also misleading about Peter’s comment on oil being easier to convert to electricity to coal was that he didn’t mention that oil isn’t simply used for energy (and neither is coal when it is converted to oil only used for energy). It’s used for many other things other than energy, including vaseline.

I can see and hear why Peter is being used as a front for evolution and Big Bang propaganda: he has an appearance of wisdom (physically and from his educational record), but sounds like a liberal 2o-year-old. If only he would accept the fact that his head puppeteers, the rich globalists with the help of their fanatical nature worshipers (hippies), manipulate his anti-petrol propaganda in an attempt to get rid of the middle class, destroy Christianity, and keep third world countries poor and easy to take advantage of.

There is another Peter Ward, a “Peter L. Ward”  of Teton Tectonics who claims that the main cause of global warming is sulfur dioxide from volcanic eruptions, and uses the mythical evidence from the mythical time from before 6,500 years ago as evidence.

I have a message specifically for you Peter:

You said on Coast to Coast AM this morning, when asked by a caller how oil got down thousands of miles deep below the earth into the ocean if it was from plants, simply repeated, WITHOUT EVIDENCE, that it was from plants that were under great pressure. Peter how does that answer how the plants got down there? You didn’t answer the question, you bullshitted because you had no answer. You basically said, “It just is.” So who has the “God of the Gaps”, who is teaching anti-science Mr. It Just Is. Plants get eaten by bacteria and weathered away and burned away for fuel, they don’t magically pile up and rot into oil anymore than the plants of today do.

The Bible is true as is clear from the evidence: http://20questions.tk (scroll down to the links). You would be aware of this if you weren’t always dwelling on yourself and how you feel about things. As you are supposed to remember: truth is not determined by how you personally feel about it. You can talk all day long about the Earth being underwater, but God already flooded it, as you can see, as anyone can see from the jumble of sea fossils scattered all over the world’s dry land masses, including on the tops of mountains. There is no nice neat organized strata showing an imaginary steady gradual evolution from little “primitive” crystal fairy beings to “big advanced complex” beings. That’s all in your head, which you’ve chosen to fill with fanciful delusions. You are the absurd one to pretend TO SAY THAT YOU SPEAK FOR ALL SCIENTISTS IN YOUR FIELD LET ALONE ALL SCIENTISTS, that is a narcissist talking, not someone who is mentally sound. Who the Hell are you Mr. Liberal Friends Gave Me Fancy Sounding Degrees, to say a creationist isn’t a scientist or that a Christian is not one? Or that “bigger is righter”? What a fool, ignoring the obvious so that you can have fun getting everyone to listen to your drama queenery. “Oh look everyone the world is flooding, oh don’t believe that God Bible man in the sky which said the world could be flooded, that’s fairy toilet paper, but listen to us modern day evolutionist atheists and anti-Christian theists who were the only scientists and came up with all the inventions in the world and are non stop charities (yeah right): the world’s gonna be flooded again!” Is that what God reveals in any prophecies in Revelation? No. But what does it say after the flood occurred: THAT GOD WOULD NOT FLOOD THE WORLD AGAIN AND THAT THE RAINBOW WOULD BE A CONSTANT SIGN OF THIS. MAN IS NOT IN CONTROL OF THE WORLD: GOD IS. And wow, so you know what happened billions of years ago, 15 billion huh? But we Christians are the absurd ones for believing what happened 6,500? Insane much? Backwards much? You’re backwards. The primitive one is you and those who think backwards like you, who accuse others of the very hypocrisy you resort to just to look right, despite being an obvious liar. Listen to God false prophet, not your feelings. He made it convenient for you to learn what he taught, but you come up with every and any arbitrary excuse not to study. “Waaaah, I have to learn more after getting a thorough brainwashing from my evolutionist friends?! No thanks Daniel Knight I’ll stick with my way! No one can change my beliefs!” Yes, I know you’re a religious fanatic, what about it? How can someone with so many degrees be ignoring so much evidence against his insane ranting? You’re corrupt. You should have learned logic and studied morality and religion: life is not livable no matter how many numbers you fill your head with and no matter how many physics facts you learn, if you forget logic and moral laws. The scientific method is not a substitute for do not lie at all It’s not a commandment warning people about the danger of Hell. And if it helps, read Judges, and see if you can spot where it reveals the scientific method. And if it makes you feel any better, God made everyone a scientists. You’re not the only one who 1) Imagines 2) Tries 3) Tries again 4) Gives up or succeeds. That’s programmed into us all genius. Did you know that? Maybe if you weren’t so busy playing follow-my-liberal-feelings-preacher you would have noticed that Mr. I’m a Scientist Haha You’re Not. And Peter, you said you would take on arguments against global warming, why then did you reply with “that’s just a load of crap”, “that’s screed” when you were told that the eugenics movement was apart of the depopulation movement you’re supporting? You’re a liar. And what a hypocrite and weasel: You said on Art’s show this morning that the booing you got from creationists when you spoke scared your eight-year-old, awww poor you and poor eight-year-old, what about the millions of Christian kids murdered by the pagans of Rome, then millions more by the Catholics of Rome, then many millions more and more than just Christians killed by atheists in the name of “progress” and using “evolution” as justification? What about the endless bullying of Christians in atheist dominated countries like China, Russia and it’s former states and Vietnam, the endless tortures and imprisonments and enslaving of Christians in those countries? What about the babies you encourage mothers to murder in their womb, cut up without anesthetics? But yeah: poor you, you got booed when you spoke to endorse TORTURE, BULLYING, AND MURDER OF KIDS, OF BABIES EVEN, and your kid was scared. If you had taught your kid to fear God, and not you, then he wouldn’t have feared his idol dad being boed. What a self-centered, insulting, arrogant, hateful, ignorant wimp. You’re a babbling, gullible sophist, not a professor, and not a “Doctor” as Art and others pretentiously call you.

Learn more about broken logic here: http://circularreasoning.tk if you’d like and why it is false that the universe and Earth are older than 6,500 years, why the radiometric dating you rely on is false evidence.

Update:

I asked Peter to fulfill his claim on taking on anti-global warming arguments. Here was my letter to him:

[On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Daniel Knight wrote:]
You said you would take on the anti-global warming arguments, can you
take on the one here?: http://artbell.tk

What answer could you possibly give other than, “Oh.” ?

As for email being the most hateful form of communication? Is that some
science based claim or your opinion?

God bless you.

And here was his hypocritical, bigoted biased reply:

There is no god.  Wake up.

Professor Peter D Ward
Dept of Biology
The University of Washington
Seattle, 98195
206-543-2962  ( Office )

In other words, this hypocrite atheist sent me the very hate mail he complained about, all because I asked God to bless him. In other words, he booed me for blessing him, but was perfectly happy to accept Art Bell’s, who has emphatically stated that he doesn’t believe in the Big Bang Theory. Someone that gets as easily upset as Ward, isn’t going to have the mental stamina to know much truth, especially if they spend their time obsessing on controlling what others think and say.

“This only have I found: God made mankind upright, but men have gone in search of many schemes.” – Ecclesiastes 7:29

U.N. Climate Panel Admits Making False Prediction on Rise of Sea Level

February 24, 2010 Leave a comment

from reuters.com

U.N. climate panel admits Dutch sea level flaw

2/13/2010
edited by Louise Ireland

OSLO (Reuters) – The U.N. panel of climate experts overstated how much of the Netherlands is below sea level, according to a preliminary report on Saturday, admitting yet another flaw after a row last month over Himalayan glacier melt.

Green Business | COP15

A background note by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said a 2007 report wrongly stated that 55 percent of the country was below sea level since the figure included areas above sea level, prone to flooding along rivers.

The United Nations has said errors in the 2007 report of about 3,000 pages do not affect the core conclusions that human activities, led by burning fossil fuels, are warming the globe.

“The sea level statistic was used for background information only, and the updated information remains consistent with the overall conclusions,” the IPCC note dated February 12 said.

Skeptics say errors have exposed sloppiness and over-reliance on “grey literature” outside leading scientific journals. The panel’s reports are a main guide for governments seeking to work out costly policies to combat global warming.

The 2007 report included the sentence: “The Netherlands is an example of a country highly susceptible to both sea level rise and river flooding because 55 percent of its territory is below sea level.”

“A preliminary analysis suggests that the sentence discussed should end with: ‘because 55 percent of the Netherlands is at risk of flooding’,” the IPCC note said.

The Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, the original source of the incorrect data, said on February 5 that just 26 percent of the country is below sea level and 29 percent susceptible to river flooding.

The IPCC said the error was widespread — it quoted a report from the Dutch Ministry of Transport saying “about 60 percent” of the country is below sea level, and a European Commission study saying “about half.”

The panel expressed regret last month after admitting that the 2007 report exaggerated the pace of melt of the Himalayan glaciers, which feed rivers from China to India in dry seasons, in a sentence that said they could all vanish by 2035.

The 2035 figure did not come from a scientific journal. – Source.

Big Banged-up-headed Darwinists are truly right when they say “(We Big Bangin’ Darwinist) scientists (who are the only true scientists) are still learning!”

Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of argument admits: ‘There has been no global warming since 1995′

February 17, 2010 Leave a comment

by Jonathan Petre
2/14/2010

Data for vital ‘hockey stick graph’ has gone missing
There has been no global warming since 1995
Warming periods have happened before – but NOT due to man-made changes
Professor Phil Jones admitted his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’

The academic at the centre of the ‘Climategate’ affair, whose raw data is crucial to the theory of climate change, has admitted that he has trouble ‘keeping track’ of the information.

Colleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers.

Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.

The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

The admissions will be seized on by sceptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made. – More here.

Again, this is also old news, from September 2009!: The Dog Ate Global Warming

The “skeptics” should also seize upon this evidence that Darwinists and Big Explosionists can’t be trusted being that their logic and morals have been severely compromised by their severe error of denying or disbelieving the clear intelligent design of this only known universe.

Himalayan glaciers: New errors in IPCC climate change report

February 11, 2010 Leave a comment

Himalayan glaciers: New errors in IPCC climate change report
By Richard Gray and Ben Leach
Published: 9:00PM GMT 06 Feb 2010

Last month, the IPCC was forced to issue a humiliating retraction after it emerged statements about the melting of Himalayan glaciers were inaccurate Photo: ALAMY

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) report is supposed to be the world’s most authoritative scientific account of the scale of global warming.

But this paper has discovered a series of new flaws in it including:

* The publication of inaccurate data on the potential of wave power to produce electricity around the world, which was wrongly attributed to the website of a commercial wave-energy company.

* Claims based on information in press releases and newsletters.

* New examples of statements based on student dissertations, two of which were unpublished.

* More claims which were based on reports produced by environmental pressure groups.

They are the latest in a series of damaging revelations about the IPCC’s most recent report, published in 2007.

Last month, the panel was forced to issue a humiliating retraction after it emerged statements about the melting of Himalayan glaciers were inaccurate.

Last weekend, this paper revealed that the panel had based claims about disappearing mountain ice on anecdotal evidence in a student’s dissertation and an article in a mountaineering magazine.

And on Friday, it emerged that the IPCC’s panel had wrongly reported that more than half of the Netherlands was below sea level because it had failed to check information supplied by a Dutch government agency.

Researchers insist the errors are minor and do not impact on the overall conclusions about climate change.

However, senior scientists are now expressing concern at the way the IPCC compiles its reports and have hit out at the panel’s use of so-called “grey literature” — evidence from sources that have not been subjected to scientific ­scrutiny.

A new poll has revealed that public belief in climate change is weakening.The panel’s controversial chair, Rajendra Pachauri, pictured right, is facing pressure to resign over the affair.More here.

Weather forecaster says: ”Brutal cold” to strike USA soon

February 5, 2010 Leave a comment

Masses of Freezing Cold Are Approaching the USA…

Brutal Cold Set to Invade Plains, East Next Week / A Storm to Remember
2/5/2010/9:24 A.M.

A winter storm that will be remembered for decades to come will cause major travel issues across the mid-Atlantic with over 2 feet of snow possible in some areas by Saturday evening. The heaviest snow will fall across northern Virginia, Maryland, Delaware and southern New Jersey.

Snow will continue to overspread eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey through this evening, making the commute home from work slow and slippery.

The heaviest snow will fall overnight into Saturday morning before tapering off by Saturday evening in most areas. At the height of the storm, blowing and drifting snow with near-zero visibility will make travel nearly impossible. Source

Brutal Cold Set to Invade Plains, East Next Week
2/5/2010/ 9:24 A.M

Next week, a new major winter storm that will threaten the southern Plains could spread snow to the Great Lakes and Northeast. Most of the eastern two-thirds of the nation will have to endure brutal cold following the storm.

After a bit of snow creates a few slick spots in the northern Plains into Saturday, arctic air will blast into the region Sunday.

The invading frigid air will cause temperatures to plummet through Sunday across the northern High Plains. Temperatures will drop below minus 10° near the Canadian border Sunday night, then may not recover much above zero Monday.

Highs elsewhere across the nation’s northern midsection Monday will be held to the single digits and teens, which is 10 to 20 degrees below normal. Source

Blizzard to Bury the East
2/5/2010/8:49 P.M. E.T

Heavy snow is moving up I-95 from D.C. and Baltimore to Philly. Some areas will get more than 2 feet with blizzard conditions. Join Evan Myers and Jon Porter. Video here.

Related book: Not by Fire… What Killed the Dinosaurs (Note: I think the title of the book is misleading as it implies that extremely huge amounts of people will die as a result of cold weather, however the Bible makes it clear that it will not be due to the weather that an extreme amount of people will die in the future, but rather from fighting, misinformation, and, fire (extreme heat caused by God himself), though not only from those things).

Global Water Vapor Changes Shows Another Major Flaw In Global Warming, Climate Change Hoax

February 3, 2010 Leave a comment

Water vapour a ‘major cause of global warming and cooling’
By David Derbyshire
Last updated at 6:30 PM on 31st January 2010

Climate scientists have overlooked a major cause of global warming and cooling, a new study reveals today.

American researchers have discovered that the amount of water high in the atmosphere is far more influential on world temperatures than previously thought.

Although the findings do not [*cough* sure they don’t *cough*] challenge the theory of man-made global warming, they help explain why temperatures can rise and fall so dramatically from decade to decade.

The study, published in the journal Science, says a 10 per cent drop in humidity 10 miles above the Earth’s surface explains why global temperatures have been stable since the start of the century, despite the rise in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

And a rise in water vapour in the 1980s and 90s may also explain why temperatures shot up so quickly in the previous two decades, they say.

More here.