C2C AM – How to Get to Heaven

A Demon-fooled Mormon and Noory’s Evil Jester ”JC”

On the “NDEs and Open Lines” September 2, 2011 edition of Coast to Coast AM, after Noory interviewed Kathy Baker, he had open lines and spoke with a Mormon grandmother(?) who told him a detailed story. Her story added to the evidence for my claim that demons pretend to be angels and dead humans to fool people into thinking that the Bible (and the religion of fundamentalist Christians that is based on it) are wrong, in other words that you can get to Heaven without needing forgiveness. She told a story about a 5 year old boy whom she took care of who had a mom he hated. I think it was his grandmother. She said one day he said to her that he wanted to die and to make a long story short missed Jesus and wanted to be with him. And the next day said he could travel through time and space and one day found him in a perfect lotus position, and said that angels taught him how to do that. She said that amazed her because she was a Mormon and thought that only her religion was true. That was a stupid statement because simply sitting in a lotus position doesn’t mean there is more than one true religion, it’s just a way of sitting. It’s ironic too since logically she should have seen it as verification of her religion since unlike traditional Christianity, her false version (Mormonism) teaches we are with Jesus before we are born. But Mormons are stupid when it comes to evidence and logic, so no surprise there. It’s also not surprising she was duped into believing whatever it is those demons bothering the kid wanted them to believe, because the Mormon religion is based on a narcissist named Joseph Smith who supposedly received a revelation/having a vision from an angel or angels (and Joseph Smith kept changing his “first vision” story by the way, despite what most Mormon’s claim) or instead God and Jesus who gave Joseph a new gospel, that being that “none of [the churches] are true.” Gospel means “good news” if you don’t know. Great gospel huh? Instead of, “Good news, Jesus suffered and died for sinners making possible their ability to live in peace forever if they repent,” it’s, “You’re all wrong cuz I had a vision no one else saw, and I’ll not tell you why till nine years have gone by while I make my own more exciting Bible to show why you’re all wrong.” So, from the day the the 5 year old said he wanted to die, he got hit by a car 2 weeks later and died in a car “accident”. I suspect rather it was a demon or demons that caused it, he had been trying ever since he said that to kill the boy and possibly get the grandmother, mom and 16 year old guy who hit him, to all commit suicide.

George also let on a silly person called J.C. I think after the Mormon woman was on.

“J.C.” is an annoying person who has been on more than four times, and each time pretends to be a fundamentalist southern Baptist Christian as best I can tell. George said of him that he “cracks me up”. He decided to let J.C. give his usual rants and to do something “different” this time, and let him speak to other guests. The first caller that comes on at that point is a man who wanted to talk about his dead sister and clearly didn’t want to talk to J.C. So what does George do after J.C. trounces on the other caller? Allowed J.C. to move on to another caller while putting the other caller on hold… How about put J.C. on hold till that caller got to tell his story? Two other calls also didn’t want to talk to J.C. out of three and George finally got rid of J.C.

Ironically George had asked J.C. if he believed in ghosts and J.C. said of course and that they were bad spirits. Interestingly he didn’t say they were demons, but implied that they were dead humans who didn’t qualify to get to Heaven. He also seemed to indicate that he had a conscience without saying it when he pointed out that he would seem like a jerk to people listening when the first caller was someone who wanted to talk about his dead sister, which J.C. didn’t realize when joking with him. A person without a conscience wouldn’t have shown concern. So, I don’t think J.C. was “anti-social”. But, that comment about ghosts not being demons, that is unlike a fundamentalist Christian, since F.C.’s believe ghosts are demons pretending to be humans. On top of his usual poor imitation of them, that comment about ghosts he made is evidence to me that he has little knowledge of F.C.s, even if he used to attend some F.C. church. If he did, he must not have paid much attention. His stereotype is very narrow and seems outdated. For example he was saying that he was rescuing some woman from “rock n’ roll” music, which is something unheard of to me. At best a parent will just try and prevent their kid from listening to it, not try to “rescue” them from it. And not many Christians in my experience are against it. The only ones I knew of who were are the ones who follow the narcissist pseudo-Christian Bill Gothard and “orthodox” Presbyterians, not all of whom are against it, but who just have a problem with the lyrics or it not being a style of music that fits their usual moods, just like most people don’t listen to death metal, because it doesn’t fit their usual moods either.

I noticed that George seemed about to say that the angels the 5 year old had seen, might be demons, but him not being the type to offend, especially since the 5 year old died and the grandmother distraught, didn’t say that, but just, with a contrived tone, pretended they were angels coming to take him away. What was interesting is that when J.C. came on, my perception seemed right, since it seemed he was hinting at what he was actually thinking concerning the previous call, was that those angels were demons, because he asked J.C. what he thought of ghosts. That may seem like a stretch, but the grandmother had just gotten off and might have been listening, and if he said, “What do you think of those angels the five year old saw actually being demons trying to send him to Hell?” might have gotten the grandmother to cry more and upset a large number of listeners.

I wonder if George, who claims to be a Catholic, but who is more like a pseudo-Catholic, ever thinks about this verses in the Bible:

“God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong.” – Paul

“Man shall not live by bread alone, by by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” – Jesus

Demons Pretending to Be Angels and the Free Will Heresy

On Coast to Coast AM last night, George Noory had on “Doreen Virtue” which C2CAM says, “is a spiritual doctor of psychology and a fourth-generation metaphysician who works with the angelic, elemental, and ascended-master realms.” In other words, truthfully, “she communicates with demons which she has deluded herself into thinking are angels and so called ‘nature spirits'”. Doreen herself on the show acknowledged that demons can pretend to be angels and that people should not romance them for pleasure.

On the show, Doreen claimed that we must ask angels for help to get help from them, which reminded me of Mormons and other Free Will Christians, and suspected that that is why she said that, and then no surprise to me she confirmed it by saying that that was necessary or it would be a violation of our free will, however, she contradicted herself afterwards by saying that the only time they could help without our asking for it was “if it isn’t your time” (to die). It’s a contradiction because it implies that GOD’S WILL supersedes our own, and that isn’t compatible with the heretical “free will” nonsense teaching that I’ve been observing and learning about as I keep hearing the world talk about it. Basically, the world’s free will doctrine is that human free will is a sacred thing that must not be violated and that God won’t violate it (and many non-Christians believe that Earth aka Gaea and/or ‘Mother Nature’ also has a will of its/her own), yet, it’s a lie, and like so many lies, contradicts itself. Here is how it contradicts:

1) Wills are always in conflict everywhere, generally speaking, and depending on the personality of the ones who are not getting there way, it can lead to sin, crime, hateful arguing, rather than one side peacefully giving in to the other. So, to act like human’s wills can’t be violated as if it’s some physical law, is nonsense. It’s clearly observably wrong to claim our wills cannot be gone against successfully. Clearly not everyone’s will can be done as they want it to be done and there will always be unfilled will until there is perfect peace (which God says he will bring about, except in Hell). For the Free Will Christians who believe the Bible, who claim that God can’t go against our will, they are clearly wrong, since the Bible repeatedly claims God does that all the time. Some Christians try to brush that off with the ridiculous explanation that God isn’t really going against anyone’s will (how ridiculous!) when he punishes them, because they want to be punished. That is dumb, absolutely dumb. Sure, some people in bitterness say, “bring it on” or “I don’t care” but that’s because THEY DON’T KNOW THE WRATH in store for them. Like one proverb in the Bible says, “A servant cannot be corrected by mere words.” That (rebellious) servant can’t be corrected by mere talk because they aren’t feeling any pain and will especially dismiss warnings if they are feeling pleasure. It’s the same with a rebellious child or any person with a bad habit and who is having “a good time”: unless there is a painful negative consequence, emotionally or physically, they won’t stop. Further, why do so many people, when committing a crime, try to hide that they are committing a crime, or run when they think they are in danger of getting caught for that crime, or lie in court over whether they committed one or not? OBVIOUSLY, it’s because they don’t want to feel pain for what they did, not “BECAUSE THEY WANT TO BE PUNISHED”. But in order to defend their backwards doctrine, that is how absurd and childish heretics must think: backwards, backwards to the point of embarrassing absurdity that even kids who aren’t brainwashed can recognize is obviously stupid and illogical reasoning that goes against what even stupid people know is stupid.

2) If God’s will is also sacred and cannot be violated, then how can everyone else’s will also be sacred and forbidden from being violated being that God’s will is often not the will of man or anything else? That is a clear contradiction. And it is obvious that if anyone’s will is going to always be done, it’s going to be the all-knowing all-powerful eternal Creator’s, not the created things that like ants compared to him. The Bible even says that God’s will is always done in Heaven, and has us pray that it will always be done on Earth, and even Jesus said to God, “…but your will (be done), not mine.” Doreen tried to dismiss the Bible and untrustworthy because, “it’s been rewritten many times,” the cliche attack of an ignoramus who doesn’t know or refuses to acknowledge that the Bible is backed up by many old copies of itself showing that it has been copied very accurately in all the places that matter most, and that there is no evidence of loss of text. Her logic is also wrong in what she implied, which was that many copies necessarily lead to errors. She also stupidly implied that God can’t preserve his own word. With such an unreliable God why does Doreen pretend to love and honor him and that he’s in control? If he can’t preserve his own word, his laws, his commands to love, then how can we? And why follow him if he can’t keep track of what he says or if we can’t? Again: contradictions. That is the lot of liars: lies and contradictions.

3) Why would there be an exception like Doreen claims, that “unless it’s “not your time” angels can’t help you”? Is it just because she said so? Because some angel supposedly told her so. And so what if one did? Can demons pretend to be angels? She herself said so, so then she cannot simply claim, “angels never lie.” And being that humans can repeatedly make the same mistakes and be deceived till death, for years, she can’t claim, especially as a religion-ignorant, which she clearly is, that she is undecievable, immune to be fooled, tricked. Further, some demons, not merely staying in one place and keeping to themselves, go out of there way to lie to humans and deceive them, and having lived for thousands of years, have mastered deception and know how humans react to all kinds of situations and suggestions. And how long has Doreen lived in comparison to such demons? She sure has not lived long enough to become a master of the truth, nor has she studied well enough as was indicated by her evil broadside attacks against Christians, like that they “blackmail” people into believing there religion and her illogical vague statement that “preaching fear” is negative energy (a meaningless statement) with the implication that that is bad. And guess what Doreen is doing by making those claims? According to her vague nonsense, she’s also “preaching fear”. It’s also a clear lie to claim as she did, that all Christians do is talk about fear. Truly she’s a lying ignoramus. Who doesn’t know that millions of Christians have said and still do, “God is love” or “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whoever believes in him will not perish, but have everlasting life” or “love your neighbor as yourself” or “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” or “love your enemies” and “bless those who curse you” and the most famous of all, “Do unto others as you would have them do to you,” all of which are verses from the Bible. Yet she slanders all Christians, including the children, as “preach”ers “of fear” and negativity. Clearly it’s Doreen who is the preacher of fear and negativity by mainly focusing on what she perceives are “negative” things about Christians and mainly finding fault with them, when clearly they have done much good and continue to do so (I’m talking about true Christians, but even Free Will ones do some good, though at the expense of the truth about how to get saved and to lead people away from true salvation, though not all realize they are misleading people).

4) Doreen Virtue also made clearly wrong claims, which is that angels can’t help you unless you ask for it: but as she herself would know, angels are always helping people without them asking for it, and some don’t even believe in angels when they are helped by them. Many people also don’t pray for the help of angels, but ask for God’s help, knowing that he uses angels to do things for him, yet Doreen says to pray to the angels. Why would you pray to the angels rather than God who is in control of them? If you want a coworker to be friendly to you or to help you who is in a different state, do you pray to the coworker or to God? But Doreen hates God, so refuses to go to him for help, but instead wants to worship what he created.

5) Concerning again Doreen’s claim that angels need our permission to help us, how can she say that when surely she hears stories all the time of people being helped by angels and not knowing they were angels or being helped without asking? That could be seen a deliberate deception or insanity for her to ignore what she repeatedly sees contradicts her “free will” belief, which is really about pride and a childish attitude of rebellion towards God. And if angels need our permission, then doesn’t God? Does God need our permission for anything? Obviously to say he does is stupid. That’s lying say that I need the permission of a toy I made, even a living one with a mind, to do anything to it, or that a parent needs the permission of the child to move it somewhere, teach it something, feed it something, give it a gift, love it or even talk to it (which leads to a paradox: how can you ask for permission to talk without first talking if not given permission to talk?) And if a parent doesn’t need its the permission of its children for anything but a few exceptions, how much less does God the creator and sustainer of all things need it? And consider the evil consequences of this free will logic, at least Doreen’s: Humans must ask each other for permission to help each other in all circumstances, including to save each others lives. Consider how many more people in the world would be ignorant, sad, injured and dead from such a law. But many people realize the evil of such bad logic, and have made “good Samaritan” type laws as are mentioned on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law. It’s noteworthy that Wikipedia however, doesn’t point out the origin of such laws: God’s word.

“Do not let anyone who delights in false humility and the worship of angels disqualify you for the prize. Such a person goes into great detail about what he has seen, and his unspiritual mind puffs him up with idle notions.” – Colossians 2:18

“the devil took [Yeshua] to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. “All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.” Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.’” – Matthew 4:8-10

“I will keep on doing what I am doing in order to cut the ground from under those who want an opportunity to be considered equal with us in the things they boast about. For such people are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.” – 2 Corinthians 11:12-14

“who are you, a human being, to talk back to God? Shall what is formed say to the one who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’ Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?” – Romans 9:20-21

Update: 6-16-2011

Yesterday, after having written the above (except Romans 9:20-21 which I added while adding this note), I finally realized the solution to what was a long and great mystery to me: “Is the human will and all wills “random” (because random would seem to be the result of ‘not controlled’, in other words, not a machine that is just programming or being moved around by God directly or indirectly), and is randomness necessary, and if random, how could God predict what would happen in the future correctly? And is a random will necessary for self-awareness and responsibility for the actions of the person who makes choices using their will?” God’s word had the answer all along. First of all, it makes it clear that God predestines everything (and the claim that God doesn’t predestine anyone to Hell is stupid). God doesn’t destine some things and others allow to be loose, random and free to do whatever. Second, there is no evidence that a will must be random in order for a person to be aware of themselves and that their choices and to be responsible for them.

“To humans belong the plans of the heart” – Proverbs 16:1

“A person’s steps are directed by Yahweh” – Proverbs 20:24

“In Yahweh’s hand the king’s heart is a stream of water that he channels toward all who please him.” – Proverbs 21:1

11:11, Synchronicities and Evidence of Intelligent Design

About two weeks ago I think, while looking up more information on Srinivasa Ramanujan, a super mathematical genius who shamed atheists and Hinduism by his belief in some sort of God and gods etc., and because by obeying the Hindu religion his life was cut short, probably the greatest Indian who ever lived next to Christian ones (which shames Hinduism in that they lost their best man). Well, I found some British radio show on him, and downloaded it, and learned of a mathematical law, which is that the number one shows up the most frequently out of all other numbers. Those with a large amount of understanding and a brain might think, “Shouldn’t all numbers how up equally as much as the other since the universe is just random?” But the answer, is, NO. First of all, the universe isn’t random, it always follows laws that God put in place, always follows them unless he intervenes or changes them. To say otherwise is to make a Randomness of the Gaps, and to claim that “randomness did it” (for those of you who don’t know what I mean, I’m pointing out the hypocrisy of those who believe in randomness who also mock Christians by pretending that they merely explain why anything is by claiming merely that, “God did it” and claim such a God is a God of the gaps (gaps meaning “gaps in Christian knowledge” implying that Christians are very ignorant in the context these idiots use it in).

ANYWAYS, concerning George Noory’s claim that people are always seeing 11:11 when they look at a clock, I don’t know if he is right, since people look at clocks all the time and don’t see that number. George is probably imagining this because it’s four ones in a row, which he thinks is weirder than other number patters. It’s as silly as attributing something special to the number 100 or the year 1111 or 2000 or 2111 or 2222. However, you would see the number 1 more often then other numbers, so, if you see it more often on clocks when you do look, that isn’t out of the ordinary. To me it’s another indication that God exists. The number one being the most common number reminds me of Fibonacci numbers and the chirality phenomenon, which is a name for the right-sided characteristic which all molecules in the human body have (and God made it that way).

And the reason I made this post (had finished most of it yesterday) was because a Buddhist or fan of Buddha put 11:11 in the subject of his email to me, which, in a way, was perpetuating the natural frequency of the number, which ironically, got me to write about it.

After I was done with this post, which didn’t include the above sentence, or this one, I glanced at my viewership stats, and was astonished a little when I saw the stats for the most viewed “page”, and then looked farther down, and was astonished again. This is what I saw some minutes ago… (I just looked at the clock and it’s 11:16 PM):

Update 3/23/2011:

I forgot to show this pic yesterday, which I took after I woke up and looked at my stove clock for the first time that day:

The clock was an hour behind.

Ian Punnett’s Lies, Near Death Experiences, OOBE, Demons and Hell

This morning on the Coast to Coast AM radio show Ian Punnett was hosting and interviewed Pim van Lommel concerning his book Consciousness Beyond Life,The Science of the Near-Death Experience. Ian, a false Christian heretic sophist on the Bible, once again spread misinformation about it, saying that it spoke little of Hell (wrong) and that what it did say described it as a place of rebirth. HUH!? Where did Idiot Punnett get that from? According to the Bible once a human is in Hell you don’t get out, and it is a place of permanent continuous painful punishment and sorrow with little comfort:

“There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores. The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. In hell, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’ But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’ He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father’s house, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.'” – Luke 16:19-28

“When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory. 32All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’ Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’ They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” – Matthew 25:46

And this much older passage says,

In the twelfth year, on the fifteenth day of the month, the word of Jehovah came to me: “Son of man, wail for the hordes of Egypt and consign to the earth below both her and the daughters of mighty nations, with those who go down to the pit. Say to them, ‘Are you more favored than others? Go down and be laid among the uncircumcised.’ They will fall among those killed by the sword. The sword is drawn; let her be dragged off with all her hordes. From within the grave the mighty leaders will say of Egypt and her allies, ‘They have come down and they lie with the uncircumcised, with those killed by the sword.’ Assyria is there with her whole army; she is surrounded by the graves of all her slain, all who have fallen by the sword. Their graves are in the depths of the pit and her army lies around her grave. All who had spread terror in the land of the living are slain, fallen by the sword. Elam is there, with all her hordes around her grave. All of them are slain, fallen by the sword. All who had spread terror in the land of the living went down uncircumcised to the earth below. They bear their shame with those who go down to the pit. A bed is made for her among the slain, with all her hordes around her grave. All of them are uncircumcised, killed by the sword. Because their terror had spread in the land of the living, they bear their shame with those who go down to the pit; they are laid among the slain. Meshech and Tubal are there, with all their hordes around their graves. All of them are uncircumcised, killed by the sword because they spread their terror in the land of the living. Do they not lie with the other uncircumcised warriors who have fallen, who went down to the grave with their weapons of war, whose swords were placed under their heads? The punishment for their sins rested on their bones, though the terror of these warriors had stalked through the land of the living. You too, O Pharaoh, will be broken and will lie among the uncircumcised, with those killed by the sword. Edom is there, her kings and all her princes; despite their power, they are laid with those killed by the sword. They lie with the uncircumcised, with those who go down to the pit. All the princes of the north and all the Sidonians are there; they went down with the slain in disgrace despite the terror caused by their power. They lie uncircumcised with those killed by the sword and bear their shame with those who go down to the pit. Pharaoh—he and all his army—will see them and he will be consoled for all his hordes that were killed by the sword, declares the Sovereign Jehovah. Although I had him spread terror in the land of the living, Pharaoh and all his hordes will be laid among the uncircumcised, with those killed by the sword, declares the Sovereign Jehovah.” – Ezekiel 32:17-32

Another ancient passage says:

From one New Moon to another and from one Sabbath to another, all mankind will come and bow down before me,” says Jehovah. “And they will go out and look upon the dead bodies of those who rebelled against me; their worm will not die, nor will their fire be quenched, and they will be loathsome to all mankind.” – Isaiah 66:23-24

So where did this heretic get “rebirth” out of eternal punishment? What a deceiving teacher this Punnett is, and shameful that as usual, he is still careless with his babble about the Bible despite me writing to him about his severe mistakes on the Bible long ago. Dr. Pommel also said soon after Ian’s nasty mistake that the people who return from their oobe’s come back more spiritual and less religious and are more in to reading the Bible and that “church is not as important” to them, all of these things, except for reading the Bible more, are more contrary to God, not more morally positive or “spiritually evolved” as some simpleton morons would say. This is because the Bible teaches that religion IS spiritual, which is true, because spiritual things are intangible, and much of the religion of Christianity is spiritual based: obeying good laws like refraining from making and worshiping imaginary gods, not lying, not stealing, not committing adultery, not murdering, loving your neighbor as yourself and which includes being forgiving. So this Dr., not surprising, is babbling when it comes to religion, and this is not surprising being that he does not have expertise in religion and is not very familiar with it, but rather with medicine and what those who’ve died have said about their experiences. It is apparent that at least some of these experiences are demonic illusions created around the SOUL (not spirit) of a person while it is out of their body (though not disconnected) to give them a false impression of what the real situation is concerning religion and God. This matches what the Bible says about deceiving demonic manifestations (which would include visions). For those who don’t know much about the Bible, you should also know that it says that Satan and his angels (demons) can appear as angels of light, in other words can look like the good angels.

A while after this Ian got a caller named Jim who informed Ian of his error about the Bible not talking about Hell much, and Jim made the mistake of going on about Jesus being the only way to Heaven rather than saying what Jesus said about Hell, as Ian then lowered the volume on the caller as he was speaking claiming that he (Ian) was talking about what people said about Hell after the Bible was written (which was a lie as that isn’t what Ian said), and that the caller was injecting descriptions about Hell which were not in the Bible, which was a lie as the caller didn’t give any descriptions that could be heard and Ian lowered the volume on him and spoke over him, and then Ian gave this alleged error the caller was making a technical theological name to sound like he was some scholar on the Bible, only briefly allowing the volume back at a normal level at which the caller asked something like, “You’re saying I’m describing Hell in the way the Bible doesn’t?” or at least that is what he meant. So Ian lied and used a bait and switch tactic: switching from his false claim that the Bible didn’t mention Hell much and the caller pointing out Jesus talked about it a lot, and then switching to a different subject: what people describe Hell as being like after the die. On top of that Ian didn’t say what the Bible says about Hell after implying that the caller’s (non)description was false. So tell us Ian Expert on the Bible With His Perfect Lense on the Bible and Life: what is the correct description? Tell us Great Judge Ian. But you didn’t, because you’re an ignorant idiot when it comes to the Bible and like every prideful fool, you resent being corrected.

Ian then smugly said that “maybe Jim shouldn’t read this book” because it doesn’t confirm that Jesus is the only way to Heaven and that Christians have the same experience as non-Christians (which implies that the book is evidence that the Bible is a lie, evidence that Jesus isn’t needed), and that our “lense” on life is important and then implied that that lense biases us, which is load of false claims, because,

1) that same lense would bias you too hypocrite Ian who denies with your lense comment that anyone but those who agree with your feelings and your lense can know the absolute truth (hypocrisy),

2) besides the Bible already being confirmed by all kinds of evidences as being true itself,

3) the book does not contain evidence that anyone who went to Heaven was allowed to stay, only an implication that some people had a choice, and yet at least one testimony the Dr. mentioned which slipped right over Ian’s head, was that one woman while out of her body was forced to go back in to care for her children;

4) Ian stereotyped all Christians!: Who said a Catholic is the same as a Calvinist?;

5) None of the testimony in the book said anything about God saying that Jesus was not needed to get to Heaven, not from the mouth of Jesus or God;

6) Ian was deceptive about what both non-Christians and Christians have said about what Hell is like when they experienced what they thought was it while out of their body. Ian was deceptive by being vague, and by being vague didn’t distinguish between misconptions of what Hell is like (like some people are so stupid they think they can have some kind of tormented fun / “rule in Hell” by tormenting others and bossing them around, and OOB descriptions of Hell, eye witness testimony that is, which DOES match the Bible’s description, except one case I remembered from Unsolved Mysteries, in which a mean-hearted atheist named Howard Storm had a vision of Hell or had gone there as he believed, and as a result (contrary to what Dr. Lommel said was the normal reaction: to become “more spiritual” (in some vague, nebulous way)), BECAME A CHRISTIAN MINISTER AS A RESULT! In old age Howard still repeated his testimony. Another example come from Bill Wiese, who became a fundamentalist Christian after experiencing what he believed was Hell, whom George Noory interviewed just last month! The show was on July 12, 2010. He called that segment of his show “23 minutes in Hell”, and what a surprise: George made fun of him and denied that Jesus could be the only way when the guest told him that (and big surprise too then that Ian, whom George protects so far as to pretend nothing happens when Ian blunders (obvious example which Ian joked about on a recent show, has the same outspoken hateful denial.) And just six months before that, George interviewed (again), a non-Christian named Glenn Kimball, who would vainly spend his money to study various ancient religious texts. Now this man Glenn was important to the staff of Coast to Coast AM because he was their first guest allegedly and a universalist like them. He was so loved by them that they did a tribute show to him and made sort of memorial to him on their Coast to Coast AM website coasttocoastam.com. Ian also did a tribute to him on a show. The coasttocoastam.com biography page on Glenn Kimball says:

Glenn Kimball has a B.A. in Journalism and an M.A. in Communications. In addition he has successfully completed all course work for a Ph.D. in Communications and passed his doctoral exams, lacking his dissertation. He was the former president of International Exchange School and vice president of two cellular phone companies. Glenn has taught school at Southern Illinois University and was ranked by student evaluations in the top ten instructors at the university. He has been collecting ancient texts since the age of fifteen and is famous for being able to integrate very diverse texts into a contiguous story line.

And there is more vain babble about him which disgusts me too much to put here. In his last interview, with George, Glenn

Now why does he matter?: because in his last interview, which George Noory performed, Glenn gave his testimony about his over 24 hours worth of experiencing Hell, saying that it was so bad that he wouldn’t wish the experience on anyone, AND GEORGE DID NOT MAKE FUN OF HIM, unlike how he treated the fundamentalist Christian. And Ian, not surprisingly, made no mention of this in his tribute. I wrote about this last interview with Glenn soon after it was made. George also did not bring up Glenn’s testimony again. How can they both be so conveniently forgetful? Even if Hell is merely a state of mind as George claimed, why would it still be nothing to mention? Are states of mind easy always easy change? When a person is sad let alone depressed, is it easy to just be happy as some shallow morons and “gurus” claim it is? NO, everyone knows that, even the morons who peddle their “just be happy, don’t worry” nonsense. Though the Bible says to think on that which is lovely and good, no doubt to help people break out of their sadness, worries and anger, it never treats any of those experiences as something you can just snap out of. So there are three testimonies which refute George and Ian and other universalists like them, again: Howard Storm, former atheist, to Glenn Kimball, a vain universalist like George and Ian have a spiritually ill love for, to Bill Wiese, a Calvinist.

7) Ian is probably thinking (or feeling rather) that the anti-Christian behavior of people after having had an OOBE is evidence against the Bible being fully true, but why would that be evidence against it? Were the people who saw the miracles of Jesus right to believe Jesus to be a liar after seeing the miracles, or right to side with the Pharisees out of fear of being put out of their church (synagogue)? NO! Like the Bible says, humans are desperately wicked and make mistakes, and simply leaving your body does not make you an automatic wise person on religion or so called “spirituality”, nor does seeing an angel, or a miracle or being helped by an angel.

Besides those things, Ian is being gullible and a simpleton, just believing whatever it is these oobe experiencers say, and making the very mistake he claimed Jim and other fundamentalist Christians make, which is injecting their own views and allowing their biased view to distort what they are seeing. Ian is a blind guide parroting cliche attacks that lack evidence and depth, and parroting them in hypocrisy. Ian was basically using the typical “point and making lying accusations without evidence with a calm confident tone” way of arguing. Ian, like many arrogant people, make the mistake of flattering themselves as being decent or good which includes reasonable and logical, and taking their belief in their decentness or goodness as evidence that they are truly decent or good, reasonable and logical, but a person’s mere belief in whatever it is they believe, is not evidence by itself that it is a correct belief.

Note: In one of the video testimonies of Howard Storm he said about humans: “you’re not that bad” which sounds like a contradiction to the rest of his testimony about how sins are so bad that people end up in Hell for them, but he may have mispoke and meant, “You’re not so bad that God can’t forgive you”. But such a statement is not accurate, as the Bible teaches that there is the possiblity of committing the unforgivable sin (to speak against the Holy Spirit), which God won’t forgive, and also there is a cut off point for forgiveness for people who hear the gospel and don’t respond to it or respond to it: if the hear but then despise Christianity, or if they half-heartedly respond (as in only act like a Christian but fail to actually become forgiven) and then abandon Christianity; like the unforgivable sin, there is no possiblity for forgiveness afterwards. I pointed out earlier in this post and on the one on Glenn Kimball, that some people even after seeing God’s wonders (that includes Hell), get worse, not better, and that includes people who become false versions of true Christians, who I’m sure will be among the ones on the Day of Judgment, who will ask God, “but didn’t I sit with you?”

Smug Ian Punnett Spoils the ”Lost” TV Series for Millions of C2C AM Listeners

Yesteday night on Coast to Coast, the host, the awful Ian Punnett, a false Christian, decided to let loose again with his heart and mind to let millions of people know what he was thinking, and right away, spoiled th plot of the very popular TV series, Lost, which I had been hard at work trying to watch. After having spent many weeks trying, I was very disappointed to hear him give the main point away, especially since I’ve been waiting a very long time to watch something original. Ian Punnet, you are a careless, self righteous idiot, jerk, hypocrite, and snorting moron. Ian is so stupid such a stupid fake Christian, that he confidently stated, that the KJV Bible is not a good translation, and that the Bible no where forbids homosexuality, and yet he proudly allows himself to be used as and considered to be a teacher and scholar of the Bible, because, wow: he graduated from a seminary, as if any and every one was good.