Archive

Posts Tagged ‘atheists’

Why Atheism and Atheists Are Destructive To Civilization

Besides the obvious examples of mass murderers Stalin and Mao and the atheist-magic-believing anti-Christian, Hitler, who had indirectly murdered way, waaaay more people than even Catholics (unless perhaps if you count abortions, but Russian and Chinese communist-atheists may still be ahead there, especially if counting atheistic Buddhists), here’s super obvious reasons why and why atheists always remain a minority:

1. God-denial or divinity denialism to coin a new phrase is apparently born of bittnerness at life. An extreme bitterness, so extreme that it severely stunts an atheist’s ability to think rationally and without making the mistakes that make them qualify as hypocrites. That bitterness causes them to, out of bitterness (a kind of bottled up rage I suppose it could be called) deny the obvious or delude themselves into not believing it, and it takes up so much of their mental energy and causes their moral boundries (if they ever had any substantial ones) to disolve, so that being self-centered is no problem to them, like dwelling on mainly their needs, opinions, feelings and pain non-stop) that they, end up, just stupid. They end up ranting or having little anything or nothing useful to say regarding anything, scientific or not. In short, their anger and desire for revenge, like some stereotypical incel constantly distracts them and prevents them from doing much of anything useful, and progressing in knowledge and understanding. It works out the same way for anyone who isn’t an atheist and dwells on “how horrible God is for denying me that beautiful female, or sex with kids, or torturing kids and dogs for fun, or not being allowed to rape the weak, or sex with my sister, or slaving someone, or being made king of the world,” or how horrible God is for, “killing my sister when young, or embarassing me for letting me do something stupid in public and mocked over it,” or “for killing my sister who was a good person” and on and on. Atheism = “God is evil for making me feel bad, I don’t deserve to be mistreated by God, therefore I will deny his existence and deny I do anything bad to avoid further feeling bad”. Or can be defined as, “a belief or alleged belief in the non-existence of any being with superior intelligence and morality to themselves out of arrogant delusion and/or a revulsion of being made to feel unhappy about themselves.”

2. That bitterness and arrogant attitude (or narcissism) sets in motion the potential for any crime: child abuse, mass murder, ANYTHING.

3. Atheism necessarily denies any universal objective good or truth. Why? Morals are a set of information, laws, and unless there’s some reason to believe in universal morals (as in morals that are permanent and not subject to change, like the wrongness of lying and hownit should be totally avoided), such morals don’t originate with humans, as humans themselves deny morality has it source in them and can show it with proofs. Though some atheists claim it was humans who invented morallity, they have no proof and by making such a claim are claiming that “to not lie and to only tell the truth” is merely a human invention and not something necessarily true or to be obeyed as 1) there’s no permanent Hell for a liar to face 2) there’s no reason one should never lie and always be truthful as morality is relative to the human who comes up with or has morals. But suppose some atheist says, “No, there is definite evil, like “mindlessly obeying Jesus (whatever that would mean – as if Jesus ever said, “kill everyone who denies communism is best” or “lie, steal and murder” or the atheist says, “it’s wrong to lie, steal and murder because it just is, there’s no explaining why, no need for God or threats of Hell, it’s just bad”. So them, whether that even makes half sense or not, does the atheist then admit that when reasonably possible all lying, theft and murder should be punished? NO, because no atheist holds to a Biblical standard of “it’s simply not ‘good'” or “as defined by God”, and makes exceptions for “acceptable lying, theft and murder/killing”, even Sam Harris said so in one his books, that some people should be killed based alone on what they believe, and saying the type of belief qualifying a killing would be a “dangerous belief”. He obviously doesn’t consider the denial of absolute right from wrong or redefining theft, lying and murder or the belief that somd people deserve (such as himself) whatever they want, as “dangerous”. And dangerous to what or whom anyways, and in a world wherd there’s no Hell or Heaven and life could end in a blink why would any atheist’s beliefs about right from wrong matter than anyone elses? The Bible itself says that if death is the end then live how you want, as you may die the next day, and it’s just before the next day for you, it’s sure true.

4. Some atheists imply they hold life more dear than a Christian believing in permanent Hell as they’ll say, “You only live ones (so have as much fun as you can”), but a Christian would treasure life even more for the obvious reason: “if you don’t obtain God’s love you will suffer (possibly alone or among those you hate), forever”. Note: most false Christians don’t associate God’s love with protection/and salvation from Hell, but the true ones do. Some atheists hope in time travellers to rescue them I’d bet, or reincarnation, so even less so would they care about life.

5. Atheists, the more ignorant and hateful ones lump all religions and religious theists together as all the same and equally harmful and with no regard for their accomplishments or the age of the adherents (as in calling an eight-year old Christian ‘deluded, stupid, destructive and evil’) as if endless eight-year old Christians demonstrated that, when there are clear distinctions. Atheists themselves hate to be classified and “labelled” and “judged” as all being alike, so then why they do so to Christians, Judaics, Mulims or even Buddhists? Literal Christian law rejects all idols and worship of anything less than Supreme and murder, so how is it comparable with idol-ridden sexist Hinduism and idol-ridden Catholicism with it’s plague of gay priests, child aborting hetros and mass murderers (of about 50 million in Europe and Israel)? Islam and so on is not Reformed Southern Baptist, at all, and Reformed Southern Baptist is very disimilar from a Christian religion that refuses to identify as Reformed or Calvinistic but only as “fundamentalist” which at one time may have sufficed but now maybe a cover for a militant religion that seeks the death of anyone who isn’t Christian and holding “free will” to be “sacred and intrinsic and above God’s will) and doesn’t want to see gays, blacks and Muslims all hanging from whatever. But atheists in ignorance don’t know these distinctions, nor care even knowing them, as they are swimming in bitterness and wrong self-assuredness and abhor feeling wrong, so refuse to admit being wrong. If they here some truth that doesn’t fit their truth, they forget it or claim it’s merely a lie or think up some irrational argument against it and not caring about any errors in their argument or going with it anyways in futility as they’re sure, or hope they right anyways about their one central belief that God simply doesn’t exist, or even if so, doesn’t care about what he made.

Now, who would you trust to care for you or your disabled paralyzed kid or kid in chronic pain or with severe autism: someone who describes themselves as, “I don’t believe it’s always wrong to steal, lie or murder as most of the world has believed for thousands of years or those delusional awful hypocrite Christians and their terrible sex-hating boring Jesus who probably didn’t even exist or was just a magician, I believe in doing what makes me feel good so long as I think I’ll get away with it till I’m so old I’ll probably die soon before someone harms me for it”, or, “I believe in ‘as you would have done to you so do to others’ and practice this because by doing so everyone in general who follows that comes closer to what they want without offending others and causing fights, and because I have a loving God who showed me by example it’s the best way to live, and is working within me to adhere to that way of life”?

Again, who would you trust, “I do and think as I please no matter how extreme” or, “I obey the ten commandments well and the golden rule because I love to and God will permanently reward me for good deeds”? It’s super SUPER obvious who is more trustworthy or likely to be. If one has witnesses or documentation to back up being a moral person, why would you choose an atheist, who thinks or to annoy, says spending $500 million to build a telescope is just as useful as giving every poor person in America an equal share of that money, and billions more? What the is a bigger or more powerful scope going to do for America or anyone? But atheists in extreme spite and for the love of grant money and friendship with other useless God-haters love spending money on useless things.

Why Not to Trust Atheists – Yet More Hypocrisy from Atheists

January 20, 2013 7 comments

Some notes on yet more hypocrisy and insanity I’ve encountered from atheists, who many atheists claim merely by being an atheists makes them superior to anyone religious both morally and mentally. Let’s see: Yesterday night at about 10 I went to an atheist acquaintance to ask if I could use his vaccuum for 30 mins in exchange for a six back of beer, he said, “Sorry that desert dust isn’t good for the vacuum”, which he merely assumed was everywhere when he went into my apartment DRUNK, and HIGH and which I discovered while cleaning this morning had throw his cigarette onto my carpet, leaving it there for over a month, and this, after helping himself to SHOVING ASIDE SOME EASILY DAMAGED ROCKS I PUT ON MY KITCHEN COUNTER TO DISPLAY, then subjecting me to 20 minute begging session in which he begged me every which way for a recumbent bike I had bought, which he kept insisting I found rather than bought as I said I did, for no reason. This is the same moron I wrote about here that claimed I made his tarantula sick by putting it in a back of Doritos by the way. So back to me at his apartment: So then I offer him a six pack of beer, and he says, “Hell naw, I wouldn’t do it for a six pack of beer” or something about like that. Oh and, he was high again, and when I had come to his door and he didn’t open right away, I figured he couldn’t hear me because I minute passed and all I could hear was nonstop babble, so I shout his name softly right as he comes out and he says, “Yo don’t do that, there’s too much weird shit going around here, police asking me about homeless people, you have too much weird shit going on with you.” Well what that is about is A MONTH AGO, yes ONE MONTH AGO, I pointed out to him as he was pushing a guy in a wheelchair around, that some homeless people had harassed me, and he said, “I’ll stick around to see the cops mess with some homeless people,” and acted all happy about it, then went away. So I figure he was sitting out on his steps smoking as he usually does and a few days later maybe some cop or cops asked him about the incident. So over that he’s paranoid? Idiot. And then about the vacuum says, “Besides, it’s my girl’s vacuum and it cost forty three dollars.” WOW A WHOLE $43 JARED!? WOW. And why then didn’t he ask his “girl” if I could use it? Why was he speaking for her and not letting her know? So then I walk away and he says, “Sorry dog, I’ll let you use it for that bike though,” a bike that I repeatedly told him cost me $154, which he repeatedly said would take off my hands for $25, and then fix it up and, “You know what I would do with this thing? I could fix this thing up and I would cruise all over the place with it.” Yeah, so you can fix it up for nothing and then joy ride with it while I’m stuck with no to shitty transportation, atheist.

So then I go to dump out the vacuum a kind neighbor let me borrow last night into the desert, and a homeless woman who was flirting with me the day before by showing off the side of her breast to me boldly, gross – not that it was ugly but the rest of her was – a woman I’d repeatedly helped, and even the day before gave a near unused in near excellent condition $145 fake Tony Hawk bmx too, who only recently moved in, who I’d offered to let stay at my place during the extreme cold, who I gave a LED lamp too and nice amount of firewood too, walks up to me after I tell her I’m dumping out a vacuum to retrieve rocks I accidentally sucked into it, and starts whining about the shreds of paper and a few pieces of foam that came out, without me even saying I’d leave it there. I then tell her half jokingly that the Bible says to subdue the earth, and she says, “It does not say “subue”!” and argues about that, yes, argued, and I tell her “there’s like 50 translations that use that word,” and she then says, “Well they’re all wrong, they used the wrong word!” This is an atheist who maybe two weeks before said, “I’ve purged the Bible from my mind,” and seemed to get defensive when I told her that Jehovah’s Witnesses were a cult and promoted many false prophecies, to which she replied, “Only some did that,” yeah, that really makes it better, atheist. The point was, it’s a cult, their leaders put out false prophecies, and many no doubt promoted it and stuck with the cult despite that glaring bad fruit of the wolves in sheep’s clothing Jesus warned about.

I then tell I’ve picked up tons of plastic bags (I actually picked up a massive amount of trash and bagged it or put it in one spot and even DUG INTO THE GROUND WITH MY BARE HANDS TO GET AT SMALL SHARDS OF GLASS AND LARGE AMOUNTS OF VARIOUS KINDS OF FOAM AND OTHER GARBAGE to clean the desert! ONLY TO FIND OUT A LITERAL WITCH AND PSEUDO CHRISTIAN NAMED KATY, A SUPPOSED HERMAPHRODITE, A LESBIAN, WAS THE ONE BREAKING HER BEER BOTTLES IN THE AREA I WAS METICULOUSLY. CLEANING UP, EVEN AFTER I DID SO). And then to get rid of her tell her I’m going to bulldoze the place anyways. She then says, “That’s not good for the little creatures.” And I tell her there’s nothing around anyways, and she says, “Yes there is! There’s things around here!” Uh, no, there’s an occasional lizard and a bunch of sparse scrub and MASSIVE amount of glass everywhere. I told her one time I could make a rain cache and that she could of course use it, and she then like an unthankful brat says, “The water is dirty.” This is someone who boasted about being like a boyscout and made critical comments about two other homeless guys being nearby for being negative. So she can’t imagine how to filter the water, or getting a water filter?! Or asking me if I had one? Ridiculous. My point is, if the environment is so polluted that water from the sky instantly becomes too dirty to drink, the hell is she whining about “little creatures” in the desert for that that the water gets on of feeds on? Just shut up stupid atheist and stop being negative and preaching to me your liberal new age atheist environmentalist nonsense.

And then she, apparently boasting, says, “I pick up glass” (WHICH IS AROUND HER CAMP, WOW HOW CONVENIENT) and I tell her it’s a waste of time because you could just bulldoze it. And it takes up way more energy to pick it up by hand, or rather would if you attempted to clean up all the places it was in (especially when it just comes back because of repeated vandalism) because you could just bulldoze it. I then remind her indirectly that I gave her that bike, and had given her a missing bolt to it and she says, “Did you leave it on the bike?!” in a whiny hurt way. Wow, so all over a few shreds of paper dumped in a little ditch that you could easily get rid of, including by fire, that the sun would degrade into easily destroyed particles? What an idiot.

I can’t remember how, but she worked in Hurricane Sandy into her argument, because she said to me something about mother nature kicking everyone off the planet, to which I replied, “There’s 5 billion people on the planet, no one is being kicked off” and she said, “Oh yeah?! What was Hurricane Sandy?! There’s no one living there [New Jersey and New York she meant I guess], to which I replied, “There’s tons of people still living there.” That temporarily shut her up. This hypocrite by the way uses technology of course, technology she claims is bad for the planet. She reminds of other liberal hypocrites who claim the current population is bad Earth, that technology is bad, and yet use their self and technology to spread that message rather than killing themselves for the betterment of the world. It’s no different then liberals and fake Christians and other atheists who when you point out a contradiction they are making about God or some immoral behavior or speech of theirs, something hypocritical, reply, “You can’t judge, stop being critical, you’re so judgmental, Jesus said, ‘Don’t judge’, you should listen to your own Bible,” and yet that speech shows a negative attitude and is “judgmental” itself, yet another contradiction.

Like many would no doubt say who read this, “She’s homeless for a reason.” Here’s two obvious ones: Atheism and liberalism. By the way, she claimed her husband committed suicide, without a sound of sadness in her voice, and not long after the Sandy Hook massacre, asked her what she thought of it. And trying to sound wise, with a pretentious wise woman look, said, “They knew they were gonna die,” non nonchalantly, “they wanted to die.” She believes in karma which is why she was saying that. She also claimed earlier with a sly pretentious wise woman sounding voice, “I’ve studied religion for 45 years” (she’s no older than 40) and that that’s and that “the Hindu calendar ends on the same day; that can’t be a coincidence” for why something big would happen on December 23, 2012. Yes, she fell for the fake Mayan prophecy. And when I came on Christmas to ask if Miss Theologian of 45 Years Who Was Duped by a Fake New Age/Scammer Prophecy” wanted to stay over, remained silent under her tarp bed cover, as if I couldn’t tell she was awake. Yep, atheist.

And from a social media site here, from beginning to end, is a in order series of messages I sent to a Jewish atheist (and I’m posting it all so you can see there was no reason for his attacking me, and I hadn’t talked to him at any other time in any other way during these messages except to comment on something he said to all his pathetic looking and sad amount of friends, that being, “skank it up bitches!” to get people to “like” (thumb up) his band. His failed band, which includes a guy who plays accordion. To that I said, “Lol you can’t force people to like your music”. So, here’s the conversation with this idiot atheist and Satanist:

Conversation started October 30, 2012
12:55am
Daniel Knight

hey whats up man

12:55am
W. Neal

nada, just watching some QI

12:55am
Daniel Knight

what’s that?

12:55am
W. Neal

it’s a crazy british trivia show my GF showed me

12:56am
Daniel Knight

do you have a messenger? [a small deleted sentence came after this one, deleted for privacy reasons]

12:56am
W. Neal

they never really answer the questions, but the banter is great

hmm

12:56am
Daniel Knight

lol

12:56am
W. Neal

i haven’t used messengers in a while

12:56am
Daniel Knight

me neither

12:56am
W. Neal

let me see if i can log in to any

12:56am
Daniel Knight

yahoo refuses to stop starting up, msn has that big ugly add, they always ruin themselves

ad i mean

12:57am
W. Neal

i never used yahoo, i was a windows/aim guy

12:57am
Daniel Knight

or what they call their news thing

i just used aim recently, just to add some people, who apparently haven’t been on for many years

anyways when you’re not busy having a good time, give your msn email

i dont want to interrupt you right now

12:58am
W. Neal

[a deleted email was here]

12:58am
Daniel Knight

it can wait

seeya

oh by the way how good are you at the flute?

or harp?

i’d pay for a cover of various songs like at a party if you can play well

12:59am
W. Neal

flute i’m ok, and i can’tplaystring harp, but i can rock the harmonica

12:59am
Daniel Knight

like… a song from Conan the Barbarian…

lol conan on harmonica…

maybe i wud pay for that, that would be cool

ok well ill email u and email me back for a time better for u seeya

1:00am
W. Neal

will do

1:08am
Daniel Knight

what the

“A Plea of No Contest is not an admission of guilt, but is an admission to the truth of the facts alleged in the Complaint”

what the!!!!!!!!!!?

i just learned that!

is that true [deleted] ?

UGH!!!!!!!!!!!!

1:09am
W. Neal

yeah, kinda

1:09am
Daniel Knight

So how [deleted] can it not be an admission, isn’t that contradictory?

oh my god

1:10am
W. Neal

a no contest is you saying to the courts that you do not wish to fight it

1:10am
Daniel Knight

[deleted for privacy reasons]

1:10am
W. Neal

so it is seen as a tounge in cheek confession

1:10am
Daniel Knight

yeah but what the heck[,] an admission that the facts aren’t in dispute? [a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]

ugh Will.

this is a corrupt country

[a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]

1:11am
W. Neal

maybe you can

1:11am
Daniel Knight

[two sentences deleted for privacy reasons]

1:11am
W. Neal

maybe

1:11am
Daniel Knight

ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

sigh

1:11am
W. Neal

[a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]

1:11am
Daniel Knight

[five sentences deleted for privacy reasons]

1:13am
W. Neal

because our government does not care anymore for justice, they just want paychecks

1:13am
Daniel Knight

and then i got mad cuz [a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]

so my dad claimed tho he said he may have remembered wrong

so i was angry and emailed him saying [partial sentence deleted for privacy reasons]

because you know how that would look if someone discovered such an agreement

and plus i just never agreed, so i felt like im being punished after the fact

did you know that Zuckerberg moved out of the country hah?

guess why

damn man, [a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]

seeya

[link deleted for privacy reasons]

November 13, 2012
11:12pm
Daniel Knight

William, did you really “like” Walmart, or were you hacked or forced at gun point to do that…

11:41pm
W. Neal

I was working there at the time

1:14am
Daniel Knight

Okay.

I was just joking anyways.

2:53am
Daniel Knight

Hey you wanna secede with me? I’m seceding to Yellow Stone National Forest, I’m taking it over man, all the natives in america agreed to help me… I made a spear from a stick I found on the ground, I found a nickel too!

You have ten seconds to decide.

Happy birthday?

January 9
9:57am
Daniel Knight

William, don’t take this as flattery at all, but you’re too intelligent to be an atheist. I saw you liked Satanism. If you are Jewish you should remember that Hitler was an occultist, and that pagans don’t have a good reputation for morality. I read an ancient quote from some prominent Greek who said pagans didn’t care about the poor. The Greeks were also sexist as are the modern pagan Indians, aka Hindus as are the Taoists of China, who have very very low regard for females to the point where they kill them as babies. I’m sure you heard of China and now, India’s male to female ratio imbalance. In at least one large part of India, females are kidnapped for slaves, think about the irony of that. And remember I’m not a Catholic, a cult which is half-pagan, and I know you know their very bad reputation especially with regard to the treatment of children.

10:17am
W. Neal

Sir, Please do me the respect of not trying to convert me to your ignorant ways, I am a man of reason whom has studied many of the worlds faiths, i was a christian worship leader at a methodist church, taught meditation seminars at the zen center of southern nevada, engaged in worship rituals with hebrews for passover, celebrated ramadan and shivaratra, but i have found that none of these paths are valid points of view in the grand scheme of the universe, DO NOT EVER TRY TO CONVERT ME or i will report you to FB for harassment

Hail satan.

10:55am
Daniel Knight

“DO NOT EVER TRY TO CONVERT ME or i will report you to FB for harassment” I didn’t know FB was the Judge and Arbiter of What Christians May Do. Can’t you think for yourself Will? Why are you so weak minded to me telling you something peaceful and that has nothing to do with force? See: as an atheist and as someone who has rejected God, you’ve become paranoid and easily angered and self obsessed. You can’t even be peaceful about others obeying their own religion in a peaceful way, but in your paranoid arrogance have become a living time bomb over what is normal in life. You, as you can read for yourself, have only made mere claims and resorted to the logical fallacy of “The louder I yell” and “I’ll tell mommy and daddy” or “I’ll tell government on you” but of course as you’ve told me you’ve become so hateful you can’t even stand government. So where do you turn to, absurdly, Facebook, which any idiot paying attention to the news knows works with the government, and stated they do so.

“The words of his mouth are wicked and deceitful; he has ceased to be wise and to do good.” – Psalm 36:3

You are a living example of what happens to those who reject God after having come to know him, they become unwise, delusional, paranoid, fearful of Hell so badly they strain at a gnat to avoid the thought of Hell like a hyper child. You’re also an example of what happens when you dedicate yourself to Arminian theology, that salvation can be lost and that your will is more important that God’s: inevitably, you lose your “salvation”, the false salvation you never had based on your will being superior to God’s. Of course you would have fallen away being that you had no faith in God to keep you as Jesus said he would do with a (true) child of God.

You’re become so irrational you worship a permanently half-defeated demon whose future has been clearly laid out by Christ: he’s doomed to suffer forever, and no doubt so badly, his only thought will be that he is in pain, barely aware of anyone else. And as everyone knows William, who isn’t deluded, Satan hates everyone, but his own demons, and he barely has any love or them obviously.

Methodism is a false form of Christianity, big surprise it couldn’t save you. And as for atheism and pagans again, tell me William who pretends to be against racism to the point where you claim to have beat Nazis, but who clearly simply loves violence, what did Hitler do or Israel, and are the pagan and atheist countries supporting Israel, or is it alone in it’s cause to rid itself a terrorist group?

You’ve become unwise and I’m thinking, you’ll always be this way now. You would do good to get on marijuana to keep yourself from going ballistic over little things.

And William, what are you so scared and furious about me trying to “convert you” if as you believed as a Methodist and Satanist who hates everything that your will is superior, that I can convert you? And as someone who thinks he’s superior to all, why does it turn you into a wrathful demon at hearing there mere mention of God? God doesn’t act that way when he hears about Satan, so how are you superior if you lack the patience and self-control God has?

You’ve failed.

10:56am
W. Neal

I know i am superior to none, hence why i have no need to bring my beliefs to others, and i am agitated when others see me as a missionary project

10:57am
Daniel Knight

Will, you talk like someone with narcissism disorder.

You say u don’t think you’re superior to anyone yet “i’m his missionary project”

When did you become my project? I didn’t know you were so important.

10:58am
W. Neal

you don’t even know me. unfriend me

10:58am
Daniel Knight

I sent you one small message not saying anything about Christ and you turn into Mohammed.

I don’t need to know everything about you, now you’re playing Mr. Hit and Run because you know you’ve made a mess here.

William doesn’t know how to say sorry.

And William doesn’t know how to read patiently, he sees a first sentence in disagreement with him and freaks out, as a narcissist does.

http://narcissism.tk

10:59am
W. Neal

no, I choose not to engage on conversation with someone who sends me two paragraphs of hate speech about other faiths randomly

10:59am
Daniel Knight

How was my speech “hate” Mr. I’m going to tell facebook on you for harassment over your little paragraph! Hail Satan!”?

You William are the hip-shooter.

You read a little, blow up mentally, send little jabs and think that’s rational.

11:00am
W. Neal

and you continue conversations with people who tell you to leave them alone

11:01am
Daniel Knight

The Bible says, which you never did know well clearly, “Ignore arguments of ignorance” and since you’re easily upset over little things and see everything as an attack that doesn’t agree with his Highnesses Will, then no point in reading your replies anymore.

11:01am
W. Neal

one more message and you will be blocked

11:01am
Daniel Knight

You can’t even stand to read my little replies, what then is the point in talking to you?

11:01am
W. Neal

exactly, you are blocked

11:01am
Daniel Knight

Okay guy who acts like a bratty girl, run now Mr. I Have Satan’s Power

Run now Satanist.

[Note: W. Neal also claimed to be an atheist, and in a paranoid manner and tone, when I started reading some lyrics her wrote out loud around a few people who I knew would care less, excitedly told me not to do so, because, “I’m an anarchist” and some “the government is out to get anarchists” like comment.

In conclusion, humanism, Satanism, atheism, liberalism and liberal environmentalism, all stupid and evil, and never trust a humanist, Satanist, atheist, liberal or liberal environmentalist, ever, except to be hypocritical, highly irritating, self-righteous, self-centered, easily offended and easily upset and arrogant.

16 Reasons America Is Falling Apart

Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation.
And a house divided against a house falls. …
For from now on, there shall be five in one house divided,
three against two, and two against three.
Luke 11:17, 12:52

And if a house is divided against itself,
that house cannot stand.

Mark 3:25

1) Christianity in America is polluted with New Ageism, Arminianism and Liberalism or antiTrinitarian nonsense (which leads to polytheism nonsense). More than half the Christians have minds heavily polluted with logical fallacies that come from those three isms. Mormonism is polluted with Freemasonry and Occultism. The country is divided between a huge number of different types of Christians therefore, as in with different moral standards and interpretations of basic Bible scriptures. These false Christians also drain America’s money, especially using the tithing heresy, which is that Christians are to give a tenth of their income to their church (or whoever these false Christians make seem is the most worthy to get the tithe). Much of that donated money goes to either more advertising for more tithes or donations of other types, spreading their false version of Christianity and into their personal banks.

Many liberals are anti-science New Agers who drain America’s money by duping people or convincing them that New Age beliefs are right and traditional Christianity (the Reformed/Calvinistic type) is wrong. Because of this there is moral confusion as to right from wrong, and where there is moral confusion there are psychopaths and narcissists who will be raised up and who will multiply endlessly, and often getting into leadership positions (including parental) and in those positions, can do extreme damage, including mass murder.

2) Psychopaths and narcissists are becoming more and more common in America. They are one of the main reasons America is being ruined. A huge number of them are in prisons all over America (and the world) and everyone is being taxed to death because of it.

They are entrenched in many jobs, including leadership positions. Clinton and Obama are narcissists even and yet many Americans love and support them. They should be permanently enslaved and put to hard labor. The ones that committed crimes for sure in adulthood, and who do so for pleasure, should be fed poorly and made to do something useful like de-ice Greenland or mine dangerous mines and the things they mine out sold and the profit given over to orphanages or kids who need money to survive.

Any beautiful ones should be cloned and the clones raised lovingly so that they don’t turn out like their “parent”. Yes, I said cloned. Why? Because a loss of beauty from the human gene pool is a terrible thing. Also, the less genes there are to go around, the more like mass deaths might occur from people who lack immunity to withstand them. Yes, you just read that. Next:

There should be a standardized test given to everyone who applies for employment, to determine whether or not they are a psychopath (psych) or narcissist (narc), and if they fail, should be monitored from outside their property (no snooping unless evidence of a crime is committed) and any friends of family of theirs questioned to determine the personality of that person, and if good evidence comes up that they are a psych or narc, should be imprisoned until any change in their personality shows they are neither. Instead, the p’s and n’s are allowed to roam freely so long as they don’t commit any obvious crime, and so create all kinds of damage or stir up anger, which leads to mental illnesses or trauma and Hellish arguments that lead to crime.

3) America’s legal system accepts a single witness as sufficient to make an ACCUSATION despite no corroboration of the same event as EVIDENCE, a clear violation of common sense and a violation of the principle of the Declaration of Independence’s “right to pursue happiness”. You can’t pursue happiness if GOSSIP is entertained and accepted by law. It’s also hypocritically since “hearsay” is rejected, yet direct one person accusation testimony isn’t, why is one acceptable and the other not?! Nonsense logic.

4) Atheists and anti-Christians have gained a strong propaganda position for decades by having hijacked public schools and their history, literature and science textbooks and have made America in the eyes of hundreds of millions appear to be better off secular and made it appear as if those “founding fathers” including the Pilgrims, who left Britain, did so merely for “freedom of religion” rather than FREEDOM IN CHRIST. And they made it appear as if The Theory of Evolution was based on science, that science is the only way to know the truth, and that science and freedom to say and practice whatever religion or philosophy you want is what makes America great. Doing whatever you want is not what makes anything great, nor can people do whatever they want religiously: you aren’t allowed to murder in the name of some religion. To teach these things causes confusion about history and moral degredation.

5) In the liberal media, atheists and anti-Christians have made it appear as if “going with your heart” is also good, or the best thing to do, but that if you are a conservative and go against liberalism, evolution dogma or big bang dogma, that that’s bad. So multiple contradictions there which causes massive confusion and conflict among Americans, and anyone trying to reason with them.

6) The atheists and anti-Christians have successfully duped hundreds of millions of Americans every 20 years into giving up much of their money for secular education, in public schools, colleges and universities, forcing them to memorize their Darwin-and liberal/libertine-based dogma and to pander to those who are it’s main pushers in order to “get ahead” in life / make more money that the average person, not be poor, and to live comfortably. This causes moral degradation and leads to people caring more about money and pleasure than the truth, truth which leads to eternal peace and truth.

7) Atheists have polluted the Internet with many copycat pages of logical fallacy lists which Google, the most popular search engine, puts at the top of their search results, and of course these atheists have given these logical fallacy lists an anti-theism spin, deceiving millions every year into thinking that theism and religion is illogical, or of not deceiving, reinforcing existing deception. This causes moral degradation and confusion as to what logic is.

8) Bankers, clearly anti-Christian ones, the ones who manage billions of dollars, have used ursury to profit off of the world, and by doing so have helped drive everyone into debt. The Bible forbids ursury, and by not listening to the Bible, they have caused everyone to become desperate for money and comfort rather than allowing them to use their mental energies to focus on what matters more: pleasing God and getting eternal peace. So this too causes moral and economic degredation. Bankers now are known to have come with all kinds of evil schemes to steal money from others, even from other banks.

9) Celebrities, who are living idols, they by their example of lead America into going along with the bankers, atheists, liberals and anti-Christians. Youths, who are ignorant at first, are easily lead astray by those who are beautiful, powerful and who get the most attention. So celebrities have caused moral degredation.

10) Game designers have polluted the world with godless or anti-theistic, violent games, which male youths especially love, so they too have spread moral degredation.

11) The rich of the world have both sat on their money at the hurt of the poor and needy and used it to gain more money, and help the anti-Christians and liberals to continue propspering as a group, so that they can continue to dupe them into thinkng that it’s best to buy from their businesses and the anti-Christians and liberals, who are people who are immoral and arbitrary and wasteful with money.

12) As mentioned in the previous entry, the Federal and state governments of America have been stuffing jails and prisons with anyone and everyone for any reason, and police, especially in certain states, like New Mexico and Nevada, have been abusing their position of authority to retaliate, slander, libel and arrest people for disrespecting them or not pandering to them. This has an obvious destructive effect on the economy and morality as it provokes hostility towards those who are supposed to be upholding the laws of the country, not disregarding them.

13) This 12th reason, which is mentioned in the Bible, at least indirectly, is prostitution. Prostitution, as the Bible says, spreads crime. Just use yoru imagination to figure out why it works at that way, or go read why. Prostituion, for example, leads to higher rates of abortion. Abortion is murder, and the more you murder (if you have a conscience), the more you want to forget you’ve murdered. The usual way for a prostitute to try and forget is alcohol or some hard drug, like meth or crack, and overuse of alcohol and those drugs, which is common, leads to criminal acts and accidentally or in the heat of anger od desperation for more drugs, killing others. It also makes prostitutes vulnerable to rape, and of course prostites are more likely to be raped then not being that they are seen as near worthless except, logically, for sex.

14) The more abortions, the less competitive a nation is against other nations. Though the atheist nations China, Russia and Vietnam have a much higher abortion rates than the USA, so much higher that have a major male to female ration problem (which eventually leads to wars both internally and externally due to frustrated men or women) they make up for it with their superior resources, underground child labor, and greater use of their natural resources (unlike America, which locks up vast amounts of them in national forests like Yellowstone). Those countries also don’t have massive amount of their population imprisoned, and so have a larger work force. That is why, despite America’s large popular and figuratively speaking, limitless natural resources, it is losing against Russia and China. Consider: how many Tesla’s have their been in America’s history, or world history? Is it helping by aborting over 10 million babies a year? It’s a fact that extreme genius is often natural, like the ability to dance or sing well. Even if the abortions leave more resources for already existing geniuses to be able to be as helpful as Tesla, where are they then? Where are the super inventors? Where is even a Henry Ford? Clearly abortion kills not just babies, but the nation the they are killed in. The point, is that without these super innovators to come along ever few decades, that there will be technological stagnation, which helps to increase stress and frustration. With an expanding population, speedier technologies need to be created, otherwise information and help is delayed to the point where there are great losses, including life, and that causes resentment, and eventually the resentment, if not appeased, boils over into fighting, and if the fighting isn’t stopped, it leads to battles, and if the battles are not stopped, it leads to wars, and when war happens, the country is no longer a single country, but two new countries.

15) Physical health problems are everywhere in America. It’s as if they were covered with plagues. It’s a country filled with diseased people, cancer ridden people and very obese people and people who have a greatly reduced ability to work for various reasons, like meth or alcohol addiction, missing limbs, defective brains, or chronic fatigue caused by chronic depression or chemical poisoning from the water, air or prescription drugs with damaging side effects.

16) The Iraq War, aka Operation Iraqi Freedom and Afghanistan War aka Operation Enduring Freedom, besides having resulted in a loss of millions of lives, lives who were attacked without a just cause (not including God’s causes), for example the little Iraqi children who had nothing to do with the Iraq War except for being in Iraq, but have also cost America approximately 6 trillion dollars. The Chinese loan us money, we go into debt, and those who make the weapons of mass destruction, who drill for and supply the oil, and make the vehicles for transport and war, and who provide the drink and food, and the soldiers, they make money, but does it benefit America in general? No it doesn’t, because those profiting from the war are less than five percent of America, even when you include all the American employees of these companies that help the wars to continue. Yes, that less than five percent spends money on restaurants in America, grocery stores, and so on, but those who make the most money sit on it and many of them invest in foreign companies, not American. And they sit on their wealth so that they can take pride in being among the richest. Billions of dollars sit in banks, making bankers wealthy too, who also sit on their money to the hurt of everyone else. Sitting on millions and billions is like sitting on expensive goods and not using them. It doesn’t do anyone any good, not even the one sitting on them. It’s an act of hate, not love, to hoard wealth.

“The love of money is the root of all evil” – The apostle Paul

“A house divided against itself cannot stand” – Yeshua, the only Son of God

“because of lawlessness the love of many will grow cold” – – Yeshua, who is God

Related Articles:

The astonishing story of the last few decades is a massive redistribution of wealth, as the rich have shifted the tax burden

Buy Un-American

Domestic Stock Funds Now More Foreign – SmartMoney

Stock Trading Is Still Falling After ’08 Crisis

After Facebook, More Fear of Stock Market

Zynga plays BLAME GAME with Facebook as stock tanks 40%

Investing in domestic vs. foreign markets in a volatile economy

Jobs First? What Should Be Most Important For a President?

How Overincarceration Hurts Communities and Increases Violent Crime

25 U.S. cities with the highest percentage of children in poverty

Confidence in U.S. Churches Hits All-Time Low, Down To 44%

Prison and Jail Population Reaches 2.2 Million

Categories: The United States of America Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How the Atheist Government of China Terrorizes Its Citizens

November 12, 2011 Leave a comment

US Ambassador presses China on

forced-abortion opponent

Ambassador Gary Locke urges China to release blind lawyer-activist Chen Guangcheng.
November 6, 2011 08:06

China chen guangcheng anti forced abortion

In 2007 Chinese human rights activists Chen Guangcheng (in portrait, while jailed) was the recipient of the Ramon Magsaysay award for outstanding public service. (Romeo Gacad/AFP/Getty Images)

TAISHAN, China – US Ambassador Gary Locke is quietly pressuring the Chinese government on a high-profile human-rights case, acknowledging he had lodged a complaint over the extralegal home detention of blind lawyer Chen Guangcheng.

“We are very concerned about his treatment and, for instance, the reports his daughter was not allowed to go to school. Although he’s been freed, he is still under severe restrictions on his movements,” Locke told GlobalPost in a private interview Friday. He said the Chinese government has not yet responded to the letter he sent in September.

Chen was released last year after more than four years in prison but remains under house arrest, without charge, and has reportedly suffered beatings in captivity.

Since Locke sent the letter, Chen’s 6-year-old daughter has been allowed to leave her home to attend school, under guard.

The ambassador, who arrived in Beijing in August, added his voice to the chorus calling for China to ease its extreme treatment of the self-taught lawyer, who is known for exposing forced abortions in his hometown in Shandong province.

Chen has become a galvanizing figure for those concerned with human rights and with the growing clampdown on free expression in China. Dozens of activists, journalists and diplomats have tried to visit Chen in recent months. They have been chased away, beaten and robbed by gangs of thugs who stand 24-hour guard around Dongshigu village.

Still, the visits and support continue, with many referring to it as “adventure tourism” in Shandong.

In recent weeks, thousands of users of Sina Weibo, China’s micro-blogging service, have changed their photo icons to pictures of themselves wearing sunglasses in solidarity with the blind lawyer, who wears dark glasses. This week, iconic artist and government critic Ai Weiwei posted a photo of himself in shades to support Chen. Earlier this year, Ai himself was arrested and disappeared for three months over what he says is a fraudulent tax bill.

Chen, who turns 40 in the next few days, is a self-taught lawyer who ran afoul of authorities in Linyi, in Eastern China’s Shandong province, for exposing forced abortions of local women targeted by local officials under China’s one-child policy. After multiple run-ins with the law over his human-rights work, he was sentenced to prison for “damaging property and organizing a mob to disturb traffic.”

Since his release in 2010 Chen has been unable to leave his village or even his home. Last year, he and his wife managed to smuggle out a video detailing their lives in their home prison. After the video aired worldwide, Chen was reportedly beaten repeatedly. – More here

As for Biblical prophecy, besides this being more evidence of the last days, it also seems to imply that Asian countries, or certain ones, will be ruled by monarchies sometime in the future. This will be more likely to happen if enough Chinese citizens become wealthy enough, wealthy enough to afford guns, including sniper rifles, or grenade launchers. Once they can do that, they can overthrow their oppressive government, and China can then split up into various kingdoms:

Trainee Workers at Issue in China

From the Wall Street Journal:

Recent strikes in China are highlighting a technique widely used by foreign companies to keep costs down: hiring large numbers of “trainee” workers who can be paid less than the legal .

The practice, while legal, has been a source of complaint for at least some workers during recent strikes, and experts say foreign companies may have to refrain from overly relying on it.

For companies operating in China, “the whole labor-unrest saga should lead to a rethinking of labor relations,” said Andreas Lauffs, head of law firm Baker & McKenzie​’s employment-law group in Hong Kong.

As China’s become more aware of their legal rights, they are starting to question some employment practices, such as excessive overtime and the wide use of trainees on the factory floor.

For more on , see also an opinion piece in the Washington Post​ titled “China’s Workers Learn to Speak Up — But Carefully.”

Riot Erupts in Southwest China Town
Thousands rioted in Guizhou’s Qianxi County on Thursday, apparently incensed by an altercation with or “urban administration officials”. From Reuters:

The protest in Qianxi County, province, was the latest of thousands of brief, local and demonstrations that happen in China every year, and like many recent outbreaks this one pitted residents against “urban administration” officials charged with enforcing law and order.

A “clash broke out between urban administration officials and the owner of an illegally parked vehicle, drawing in thousands of onlookers and sparking incidents of crowds smashing law enforcement vehicles and blocking roads,” the website of China National Radio (cds.cnr.cn) reported on Friday.

“Crowds turned over the vehicle of the urban administration staff and attacked police who came to quiet down the situation,” the official Xinhua news agency reported.

The rioters smashed ten vehicles and torched another five, said Xinhua, adding that 10 police officers and guards were injured. The police arrested 10 people suspected of attacking the vehicles.

Unrest also broke out last month in the nearby city of Anshun after chengguan allegedly killed a fruit seller and single father, Deng Qiguo. Soon after, a journalist was beaten by local police after travelling to Anshun to investigate the story.

Strikes & Protests Surge in China

The Los Angeles Times’ Barbara Demick​ examines the continuing rise of “mass incidents” as a means to address specific grievances such as pollution and land seizures.

These demonstrators have a narrow agenda and concrete demands: Farmers want a stop to confiscations of their land or to get better compensation for lost property. Homeowners want to stop demolitions. People want cleaner air and water and safer food. Truckers and taxi drivers want relief from soaring fuel prices ….

The number of reported “mass incidents” rose from 8,700 in 1993 to more than 90,000 in 2006, according to the Chinese Police Academy. A professor at Tsinghua University, , has told Chinese reporters he believes the figure last year was up to 180,000 ….

In China, it is impossible to go to court to get a temporary restraining order if, for example, a factory is spewing harmful sustances into the water supply or somebody starts building on your land. Petitioning, an archaic practice dating to imperial times, requires the aggrieved to travel to Beijing and wait for months, if not years.

Rioting gets results. Quickly.

A new China Labour Bulletin report, meanwhile, focuses on the growing number of strikes and other labour protests, as young migrant workers become increasingly assertive in demanding wage increases. From Reuters:

Although migrant workers have often won pay rises in recent years, they feel poorly served by China’s official, Communist Party-run trade union, which has often sided with management in factory disputes, the China Labour Bulletin said in the report.

Instead, and labor have spread through informal channels, with workers often using mobile phones and Internet message sites to coordinate, it added.

“They are giving each other in real time updates of their protests, and this has allowed workers’ rights groups, lawyers interested in workers’ rights, to offer advice, help them push their demands,” said Crothall, the Labour Bulletin spokesman, speaking of these digital tools.

The China Labour Bulletin report estimates that in 2009 China experienced about 30,000 collective labor protests, and adds there is “certainly no reason to suspect that the number of strikes is decreasing.”

Related Article:

2 million Chinese people attempt to commit suicide every year: 5th Leading Cause of Death Among China’s Citizens

Atheists Do Worse Than Eating Babies: Response to Darrel the Atheist

September 2, 2011 14 comments

Darrel, an atheist said,

“If someone is insulted by my using a label that attributes two nice adjectives to myself, to bad. Want insulting? See “I am a member of the one true religion.” (“Jehovah’s Witness”, “Church of Christ” etc.)” (source)

Me: “etc” meaning what? What does “etc” include Darrel? Why would someone who believes they have the absolute truth be “ABSOLUTELY insulting” Darrel? So if someone believes they have the truth they should always qualify it with, “But I could be wrong and you could be the one with the absolute truth, oh Darrel the atheist.” What with your double standards and insanity? So if math teachers say, “10 X 100 = 1000” they are insulting for stating it as a fact? Or far more complex equations that are flawless?

And in response to Darrel’s, “Considering most people associate it with eating babies, yes, it’s pretty bad.”

Do you know what a strawman is? Who thinks atheists eats babies? How is that not insulting to say to those who disapprove of atheism or think that they are wicked? And hypocrite, they might as well eat babies: forcing abortions on the Chinese, aborting babies every day (that includes atheist Buddhists) WITHOUT ANESTHETIZING THE BABIES, and brutally murdering them.That’s not including the 500 million killed in the past 110 years by atheist leaders and those that went along with their “progress” and “evolution” or the atheists that supported the DDT ban and who continue to spread myths about DDT and all kinds of other lies that rob people of their health, wealth and life.

And Don the atheist, whom Darrel was replying to, said at the bottom of his blog (pretending that they were how theists would respond to being told that the person they are talking to is an atheist):

# They do not believe in God.
# Outrageous! How can this be! I’ve never met someone who didn’t believe in God before.

Don what Christian (not living in desperate poverty or far from a city who lacks an education) has never met an atheist or been informed that there are many of them? Oh the two-year old ones right unfunny, genius joker? Ever heard of the Internet either? Oh yeah no one ever meets an atheist on the Internet… So I shouldn’t think atheists are very dumb (at times), because? Though up until I read that part this post was unusually insightful for one made by an atheist. I found it by typing in that I thought the term freethinker stupid and insulting to Christians.

It’s thoughtless truth-careless hypocritical answers like yours Darrel, one that over looks the gross immorality of atheists over their blooming in the past 110 years, and which is in our faces every day, that many people consider atheists baby-eaters. You’re worse than that: you cut them up mercilessly and trash them or promote taking advantage of them even after that by trying to use their pieces murdered of them for the benefit of sick people psychos like yourselves, who defend all that evil. You are the ones who deserve to be cut up with anesthesia and trashed in Hell forever. Like it or not Darrel, absolute truth doesn’t agree with your lies, and it isn’t a sin to say that you know and understand God and that he loves you and that God doesn’t approve of “whatever” or only Darrel’s absolute truth, only Darrel’s fundamentalist, only what atheists believe is true. Just because atheists are offended, doesn’t mean the ones who offended should change their behavior beliefs or words, or now is “offense” the standard for truth, what offends atheists? Aren’t you blind and arrogant? Who made you God or our gods? How is it you don’t see design anywhere? Since you don’t see the obvious, it’s obvious you will have trouble seeing your own hypocrisy either.

Are Atheists Less Intelligent Than Theists In General? Judge.

In response to a the Cambridge Professor “Simon Baron-Cohen”, who wants everyone to be more specific then simply calling people “evil” and not looking into why a people are evil (as if no one ever tries to find out why people do evil things even though both former theists and religious people obviously do so all the time and though the Bible makes it clear why people are evil), an atheist named “Hector”, supposedly from Scotland, said,

I can buy this more than I can buy evil being a result of direct intervention by the Devil or any other made up mystical being. Why shouldn’t it be the case that “evil” people coming from terrible backgrounds, starved of love, nurturing and have suffered maltreatment, isolation and rejection. Why shouldn’t it be the case that society can looked into ways of fixing things.

– Hector, Edinburgh, Scotland, 08/5/2011 19:10

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

Source

So atheists are smarter than Christians huh.

Here’s my reply to comment:

“I can buy this more than I can buy evil being a result of direct intervention by the Devil or any other made up mystical being.”

The Devil isn’t “mystical”. And why would you be willing to “buy into” a made up being at all? I sure wouldn’t be willing to believe in lies. But an atheist would, as you admitted in your careless rant.

“Why shouldn’t it be the case that “evil” people coming from terrible backgrounds, starved of love, nurturing and have suffered maltreatment, isolation and rejection.”

Sadly, that jumble of words didn’t make any grammatical sense, so bad is the grammar, no point can be discerned by me, which is sad, since I usually can see the missing point in pointless and badly worded arguments.

“Why shouldn’t it be the case that society can looked into ways of fixing things.”

So, in your dark troll cave, no one has ever been “fixed” by becoming a Christian? No one has ever gotten better? No one has ever looked into “fixing” anyone? No Christian has? No Christian has ever helped anyone else to become a Christian and become more mentally stable and more logical? Get out of your dark troll hole and stop assuming things and babbling nonsense.

Atheist Evolutionists of National Geographic “Solved Mystery” Everyone!

September 7, 2010 Leave a comment

The Yeti crab is blind, yet still manages to see better than atheists with eyes that can see.

Check it out everyone, the atheist evolutionists of National Geographic have committed high blasphemy against Father Darwin by not mentioning evolution in one of their articles!:

Mystery Solved … Crab Swarm

A new study solves a longstanding mystery surrounding the crabs: how the the normally sedentary species has the stamina to “undergo one of the most arduous migrations on Earth,” in the words of study co-author Lucy Turner.

When the wet season blows into Christmas Island (map) each year, millions of Christmas Island red crabs hike for several days, from a high rain forest plateau down to Indian Ocean beaches, where the crabs mate in burrows.

“It’s an amazing feat—going from not being able to exercise for more than ten minutes to walking for several miles,” said Turner, a biologist at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom.

But by sampling circulatory fluid—the equivalent of blood—from migrating crabs, Turner and colleagues discovered that a surge in the crustacean hyperglycemic hormone works with glucose, an energy-producing sugar, to fuel the epic trek.

(See “World’s Longest Migration Found—Two Times Longer Than Thought.”)

The crab’s endocrine system also stockpiles enough sugar to allow the crabs to return to their forest homes, Turner added.

Study published in the September issue of the Journal of Experimental Biology.

—Christine Dell’Amore

Published September 3, 2010

(Just forget how the crab’s evolved to have such a system everyone and focus on how National Geographic posted a sciency “discovery”. Don’t ask questions, no further explanations needed; evolutionists are the bestiest, rightiest, “no Gods no guilt” non-group group of people with no beliefs, I mean who have different beliefs (and no similar ones, but “atheists are perfect.” Just look, they even posted a story on the danger of BPA SEVEN DAYS AGO! THEY ARE REALLY LEADING THE WAY ON HEALTH WARNINGS NOW! WOOOOOOIE! (This health campaign by Christians and others from May 12, 1999 to eliminate BPA doesn’t really count, it’s nooooot reeeeeeeeeeal peeeeeeoople, nothing to see here.) And they are letting tons of people comment too can’t you see?! Oh wait, they still have none, might be because everytime I try they give me the friendly message: “You are not allowed to comment.” Only atheists may speak their deep thoughts, like, “be honest you damn theists! Stop being hypocrites! I love to get drunk and act stupid with my sisters and try to deconvert them to atheism.” Atheists are so profound and scientific.)

Related Post:

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC DISCOVERS MISSING TRANSITIONAL BIRD FOSSIL!!!!!!!! FINALLY! ULTIMATE, SUPER PROOF OF PROOFS OF EVOLUTION PROOFS! MWUAHHAAAA HAAA, YOU FAIRY TAIL BELIEVING CHRISTIANS LOSE ROFLMAO!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! LEARN TRUTH LOGIC AND METAPHYSICS, N’ MATH, N’, STUFF YOU STUPID IMAGINARY GOD’S IN THE SKY DADDY CHILDREN. I ned to get another  beer hold on. – abbywood, college edjucaited hater of fundie Christians

See also: www.truth-haters.tk for more information on fundamentally ill atheists.

Abovetopsecret, Lying Atheists and Skeptics, Mel’s Hole and Screams from Hell

Post link: http://abovetopsecret.tk

Would have published this about 2 P.M. or earlier, but was really exhausted and had to sleep.

A fake news article headline says, “Researchers record the screams of the damned”

Early in the morning George Knapp had on Mark Allin, the corporate officer responsible for managing the day-to-day activities of the corporation and for operations management of “The Above Network” (abovetopsecret.com and belowtopsecret.com) and the co-creator of both sites. Mark is one of the men responsible for the discrimination of Christians in both websites, having them banned if they post Bible verses or speak against liberals or promote Christianity or creationism (despite the token forum sections set up for such talk). The corporation is meant to destroy all major religions, as his words, moderators and certain stories he features sometimes show. For example he made a nonsensical attack against all major religions when Knapp was interviewing, by saying that he (Mark) didn’t know why governments were hiding (and lying about) the fact that aliens and UFOs exist (after having given out the typical guesses as to why) being that “the major religions no longer control government”, or he said something almost exactly like that. In other words, “the major religions are against the truth, so I don’t know why non-religious people who now control the government won’t tell the truth”. That statement is a contradiction, besides being bigoted as it’s not based on truth itself and is libel against Christians who obey God and do good by doing so and that good ends up helping bigoted, vain, hypocritical liars like Mark to survive and live well. It’s also an absurd statement being that many people in governments all over the world are religious, which shows that Mark is an ignoramus and forgetful of the very obvious. It contradicts itself in that what he said implies that non-religious people are truth and beneficial, and so they shouldn’t be lying to or hiding helpful information from the world: they can’t be truth and hindering liars at the same time. It’s also a contradiction in that it makes out all religious people to be mere liars and people who only hide beneficial knowledge, but if that were true, they would all be dead and would not have formed governments let alone any family units that benefited anyone or which helped produce facts. No governments would have been formed being that the first people known to have existed were all religious (and therefore according to Mark, the opposite of orderly), and if you don’t believe that the fist humans were religious, archaeological logical evidence of all the first civilizations shows that they were entirely or mostly religious. The U.S. government also started out partially based on Christianity, and slowly became secular. In other words Mark implied that order and truth came from chaos, disorder, from liars and truth-hiders: but as we can see, liars and truth-hiders cannot maintain order on their own, they need the help of honest and beneficial people in order to do so, or have the appearance of doing so (and it sure wasn’t atheists or secularists who were secretly stabilizing the governments of the world for thousands of years). Because of people like Mark however, especially people who teach that the universe had it’s sole origin in a chaotic beginning and that chaos/randomness is a real “law of physics/nature” that affects everything, it doesn’t sound like a contradiction to them to say “disorder produced order”. If that is the case for you, consider this contradictory statement: “The liar is a truthful person” or this one, “those who hide the truth are people who show the truth”, or “those who promote disorder are people who promote what leads to order”.

Now some may argue that Mark was merely generalizing, but from the actions he allows on ATS, which is the endless banning of Christians and constant vilification of Christians (especially fundamentalists of any religion – and fundamentalists to them are basically, “people who teach that only one God exists and that he wants his will to be followed regardless of anyone elses will, and that God is perfect and wants you to be perfect too, and will punish you if you aren’t). And people like Mark (and many of them are atheists) always leave out that Christians or Muslims show any love. It’s also noteworthy that Mark said “major religions” which would include Buddhism, even though it’s atheistic, and so some might say that Mark isn’t an atheist and therefore very biased as I and other Christians might imagine, however, if Mark were the type who didn’t want to immediately offend, but to try and persuade people to go to his website to make a profit off them and continually by making converts of them to humanistic atheism, then it would have been logical for him to hide his hateful focus on Christians, Muslims and Hindus by making a more generalized statement, which in the minds of many, sounds more fair (and not a bias/hateful attitude due to pride) and therefore less offensive.

Mark, who makes himself out to be an knowledgeable of religion and conspiracies and mysteries also showed his vanity and carelessness when a caller that morning asked if Mark

had ever heard of the recording of screams from Hell made by a Russian researcher. Mark and Knapp said they didn’t know anything about it, but Mark said he had heard of “Mel’s Hole” and that it had been a popular topic when Art Bell was the main host of C2C A.M., and that Art was friends with Mel, and that Mel had made recordings of sounds in the hole and it probably had to do with the hole. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. It’s been shown for a long time now, more than a year, that “Mel’s Hole” and the screams from Hell were hoaxes. Even on ATS, one alien-believing member “AlienS” credit thieved off snopes.com and on the same day “ladyspiritguide” plagiarized AlienS and AlienS plagiarized snopes.com (owned by the Darwinist couple Barbara and David Mikkelson) and Barbara and David apparently credit-thieved off truthorfiction.com (credit-thieving and plagiarism is something common among non-fundamentalist Christians, and no surprise Darwinists are being that Darwin credit-thieved off Edward Blyth).

The skeptoid.com article I linked to as a reference (which I wouldn’t have done for a main reference if I had found another source I found years ago) itself has lies in it, claiming that a man named “Red Elk” claimed no native American ancestry, even though it’s clearly stated on Coast to Coast AM that he had (long before the Mel’s Hole skeptoid article was published). The skeptoid article also makes the absurd claim that,

These [Coast to Coast] episodes [in which hoaxes were accepted as fact by Art Bell and George Noory] show that Coast to Coast AM will gladly give a platform to any caller, with any story, no matter how preposterous, even those made up on the spur of the moment with no documentation or verification. Now, there’s nothing wrong with doing that and I don’t think it’s a fair criticism; after all it’s a show about weird stuff and they make no representation that everything (or anything) they broadcast is true.

Besides the obviously false claim that in order to have “weird” and strange material you most embrace any story that comes your way and that there’s nothing wrong with lying or assuming, it’s not true that C2C AM allows anyone on – as I’ve shown, it avoids fundamentalist Christians and usually belittles and vilifies them, and I don’t remember in my years of listening one Muslim guest.

Something I just realized after having typed all of the above info: George Knapp had expressed his disgust for skeptics while interviewing Mark, but Mark never once mentioned Bill Irvine, the CEO of Above Networks, and participating member of ATS, under the user name, “Skeptic Overlord”.

Fear of Atheists and Catholics Delays Justice for Gang-Raped 7-Year-Old in Trenton, NJ

April 3, 2010 4 comments

Trenton

Neighbors’ fear impedes NJ child gang-rape case

3/31/2010
by Aaron Morrison

Rowan Tower has a bad reputation. Gangs walk the streets nearby, and police are a constant, and some say ineffective, presence at the 15-story apartment building a stone’s throw from the Statehouse’s golden dome.

A 13-year-old girl was killed last year in a drive-by shooting a block away, and not a single person stepped forward to help police identify the attackers. This week, though, the mothers, grandmothers and children who live in the tower saw crime there sink to a new depth.

The reported gang rape of a 7-year-old girl who police say was offered for sale by her 15-year-old stepsister to a group of grown men has shocked residents and put them in a quandary. If they identify the men responsible, they risk violent retaliation from the street gangs that stalk the neighborhood.

“We are mothers,” said tenant Shawntel Abner. “If we aren’t here, there is no one to watch our children. You are asking a lot of us. You are asking us to put our lives on the line.”

Police said the rape unfolded this way:

The 15-year-old went to a party Sunday with some young men on the 13th floor of the building; her 7-year-old stepsister tagged along because she worried about the older girl’s safety.

The 15-year-old sold sex to men in the room, then took money to let them touch the younger girl. Touching turned to forcible sex as at least seven men raped the 7-year-old. The little girl then put her clothes on and left the apartments. That’s when two women found her crying and took her home.

The 15-year-old has been charged with promoting prostitution, aggravated sexual assault and other crimes; police have not released her name.

A 20-year-old man has been charged with having sex with the 15-year-old, but police don’t know who might have attacked the 7-year-old. Officials say, though, that someone in Rowan Tower does and are urging, even threatening, neighbors to identify them.

“People absolutely know who these men are,” Mayor Doug Palmer told The Associated Press on Friday. “If you were there and didn’t participate, you really need to come forward. If you don’t come forward, then you are going to be charged like you participated.” – More here.

Evil job Mayor Palmer: You didn’t say that you’d give protection to the witnesses or offer any money for a reward or to help them relocate. No wonder to me that your city if full of Catholics and atheists. Once again, the Bible’s prophecy that the world would become full of brutal and self-centered, uncompassionate God-haters has been shown true.

George Noory, Atheist-Hater, Shows His Hate For God

September 5, 2009 Leave a comment

When a caller called in at 12:15 P.M. tonight, he asked George if he could quote the Bible (to give his opinion on his UFO experiences), George replied, “Well, we don’t take quotes from the Bible.” This is the same George that said atheists were evil.

12:21 Update:

George said that after having a sound sleep he sometimes hears his doorbell, and has gone outside to see if anyone had pressed it, but finds no one around. Demons anyone? I wonder why demons would be attracted to George.

12:23 Update:

George claims that he’s seen shadow “rats” “with antenna” that move across the road.

May God save him.

Skepticism – A Biased Mindset that Leads to an Anti-Scientific Mentallity

(Warning, foul language)

From an atheist, who thinks he’s objective apparently, making a comment after watching a video of an alien flying somewhere, with audio track supposedly uncensored, revealing it to be a supposed hoax:

TheTimeTraveller: "I used to believe shit like this all the time when I was a kid. Even UFOs, Ghosts, Telepathy and Telekenisis, even fucking magic. When I turned 17 all that shit blew past me as obvious bullshit. Well done finding the original audio, and lets hope Weeaboos and Harry Potter faggots get a nice swift kick in the balls from this."

So then, this atheist when from being gullible and yet believing what was evident, to full biased against anything unusual so that he will only believe it is an illusion or something plain/boring/conventional and especially if an anti-Christian "scientist" says so. And, he’s slandering even mainstream scientists and calling millions liars. For example, there are dozens of scientists, police, military officers (and some who fly jets or helicopters), and civilian pilots who’ve seen things that are not any known human-made aircraft or any known natural phenomenon. The reports that are designated unexplained by the military and scientists go into the thousands at least, maybe over 100,000 if all the military accounts of the world are counted. Further, his mindset which isn’t just skeptical but fully atheist (which is worse then skepticism) won’t accept anything beyond strange, so that learning ceases to happen in new areas (thereby preventing technological and scientific advancement). So if someone for examples sees a new phenomenon or new animal, this atheist claims, "you’re a lying faggot who denies the obvious plain explanation which I feel is whatever I say it is and I hope you get harmed for your lying and disbelief in my simple atheist view."

And as history, recent events and on going events show, this violent mindset atheists have does often lead to them torturing and murdering when they are given the power to do so if their government allows or commands them to (like the atheist governments of China, Vietnam, Burma, Eritrea, and what was once called the Soviet Union).

Today, people think chronic doubt and biased against anything strange or against the belief that anything strange happens, or the chronic inability to believe in anything strange, is "healthy" or "good" attitude to have or mindset, as many Darwinists claim and even some prominent pagan creationists like George Noory.

No surprise to me TheTimeTraveller was banned from youtube. But to my disgust, and ironically, the apparent atheist that approved of his comment is still on youtube, and filters comments as I found out when I tried to reply to TheTimeTraveller, and many hours later, my reply still hasn’t been approved. Atheists truly are mentally sick and evil.

The Faith of Darwinists and Big Bombers

February 27, 2009 Leave a comment

In response to the freelance writer Jennifer Ouelette, who said, "Binary star systems are quite common, actually, occurring whenever two stars form out of a single cloud of gas and dust"… deluded much? Wow so you were around "billions" of years ago to witness this, and have a bag chalk full of evidence for this? What’s it like being an extremely deluded God-hating narcissist? Stop spreading untestable clearly absurd pseudoscience babble already. Stop setting back science for the world and hindering it with such hateful stupidity. Say what’s truly constructive for science, with love for God, then you will be honored by him.

Would absurd statements about knowing what happened billions of years ago exist, if conniving, credit-thieving Charles Darwin had kept his evolution lie to himself?: Here is an analysis of this "millions and billions of years" ago nonsense.

The Relentless Anti-Christian/Anti-Pagan Theme of the Stargate TV Series

February 25, 2009 7 comments

Was it relentles anti-Christian theme of the StarGate TV series that made is so boring and stupid?
I’m sure Protestants and Catholics, and perhaps pagans have noticed the anti-God/gods propaganda in the StarGate TV series. Do you who noticed, think that it was the writers’ obsessive hatred for the worship of divine beings that made the scripts so bad? Like I just watched one episode in which Garrick, one of the council members of the Jaffa, or however it’s spelled, said to another member, when talking about the book of Origin, “No… but if you, are to look REAL closely, you’ll find that everything that we want, is in here…” “REAL”? “YOU’LL”? That’s not eloquent, like the Jaffa are supposed to be, and that’s a child’s way of speaking, or ultra casual adult way of speaking, not what you would say when being ultra serious, especially on a life and death issue, like millions of your race being wiped out in a few minutes by “gods” with the ability to bring you back to life after being dead for a few minutes.

Another thing I noticed in the same episode with the “real” comment, was that Garrick later told one of the messengers of these “gods” that the Jaffa needed more time to change, and that real gods wouldn’t kill you right away for not worshiping (which sounds like the anti-Christian atheist’s “Worship God or die [right now]” absurd mock towards ALL Christians). Well to the atheists who approved of that argument in the show: HOW HAS 6500 YEARS NOT BEEN ENOUGH TIME FOR YOU TO REALIZE THAT GOD IS GOD, AND WORTHY OF WORSHIP FOR HIS PATIENCE, LASTING THOUSANDS OF YEARS LONGER THAN YOU WHO’S PATIENCE OFTEN RUNS OUT IN UNDER ONE SECOND? Or how is it not enough time for someone who lived to 65, lived a pleasant life, with good intelligence and access to the wisdom of millions at the presses of a few buttons on a keyboard and large screen to read that wisdom on, or to hear from speakers? Don’t even many American shallow teens consider 20 to be old, yet 65 isn’t a long time, not “old” enough to learn that God is good and deserving of your love?

Please think REAL hard peeps, and you’ll hopefully get a REAL good answer, LOL! I wonder how many atheists as opposed to theists like Stargate, or how much more highly they rate this ridiculous “Don’t worship spiritual beings or u’ll turn into a zombie with no free will!” show.

How Stupid the Darwinist Contributors and Moderators of Wikipedia Are

January 26, 2009 Leave a comment

On the Talk page of the Abiogensis page in Wikipedia it says (or did say a few weeks ago):

"This is a controversial topic that may be under dispute."

So these people are so blind, so ignorant, so stupid, that they can’t even agree as to whether or not there is agreement? So they are so ignorant they aren’t aware of Intelligent Design or Creationist scientists who dispute it? Really? So they don’t have any information on Wikipedia about Intelligent Design / Creation Science? They don’t have a list of any scientists who support that theory? So they don’t have a page on Answers In Genesis, or Ken Ham, or Michael Behe, or Francis Crick, etc.? They are so dumb, that they can’t even agree on whether or not anyone disputes the information on their page, and yet Wikipedians want us to believe that their encyclopedia is trustworthy, reliable. What evil, confused, and stupid liars they are.

Also on that page is this entry which I put in blue so that you know where it starts and ends (any bold lettering you see is from me so that you especially notice those parts):

Polyp2 (talk) 04:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

    If Tmol42 isn’t watching this page, you can get his attention by asking him at the bottom of User talk:Tmol42. There he will be notified as soon as he logs on. Art LaPella (talk) 04:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

    Polyp2, I see you are new to WP so will explain in a bit more detail. In short your edit was reverted as it was not substantiated by the reference you provided. The reference you provided to back up the edit was to a flyer for a book Here which turns out to be no more than an advert for the book with no explanation of the theory or a citation of research to substantiate the edit. In fact it appears the book is more to do with ‘a call to arms’ to start /continue research in this area talking about ID and Darwin. I see the author is postulating a Darwinian-linked theory which is in itself enough to ring alarm bells for some and claims of popularism from others. WP is an encyclopedia and not a place for promoting books per se which would be also be sufficient reason to remove the citation. In short its much better to stick to more traditional sources here.

    Visitors to WP should expect the content of articles to be reliable, have their rigor tested, and to be backed up by robust references. This is more often also achieved for such subjects through discussion and consensus reached on the Talk Pages, and is commonplace regardless of the notoriety of a fact or theory.

Yet another Wikipedian in addition to the Darwinist called "JoshuaZ" who says that the information on Wikipedia is there because of a concensus to keep it there, and not because it is TRUE. And don’t forget, according to JoshuaZ Wikipedia is not about truth, but references. So then, which is it controllers of Wikipedia, stop contradicting yourselves: Is the information you allow on Wikipedia, especially on evolution theories, there because it is true, or because of a "the concensus"? I’ll answer for you since you can’t help but make confusing lies:

Information in Wikipedia is there as long as it suits the personal feelings of the concensus of the HEAD MODERATORS of WIKIPEDIA. And there truths about the Bible are only allowed to remain there because you know that to tell certain lies about it are too obviously wrong to the many stupid visitors who come to your site, and you wouldn’t want to make it appear that your encyclopedia can’t be trusted. Plus, you might lose the support of your liberal Christian money donors. So then, Wikipedia is in part your campaign to deceive people into believing the Bible is not trustworthy. Oh, and lets not forget your deliberately suppressing information on the head bankers who oppress the world and the Free Masons who have done so. Of course, you will forget, because you hate remembering the truth.

If anyone doubts JoshuaZ said that Wikipedia was about concensus and not truth:

"Starfire, as I tried to explain to you Wikipedia cares about reliable sources and verifiability, not truth. Now, if you read that guideline, you may understand why in general AIG and many of the other sources you used are not reliable sources." – JoshuaZ

JoshuaZ is contradicting himself being that whether or not a thing is TRUE, TRUSTWORTHY is what determines it’s reliablity. JoshuaZ and his friend Darwinist administrators would like us to believe that a lie is reliable. Second, where in Wikipedia’s guidelines does it say that Answers In Genesis is unreliable? No where. So why is JoshuaZ lying? JoshuaZ is clearly an unreliable, untrustworthy, anti-Christian bigot as are those in Wikipedia who have been supporting him, which includes Jimmy Wales, whom they pretend was Wikpedia’s founder.

"Charming, and I was about to come and add a comment about how your remark here was WP:UNCIVIL but it could just as well apply to your above remark. In general saying editors are being "childish" is not advised and could lead to WP:BLOCK. As to why discussion would be preferred, see this page which explains the Wikipedia procedure in general. Wikipedia works by consensus and so if there is material that not all editors are ok with, they generally wish to discuss it. Very often some form of compromise or rewrite with some of the material will be included or all of it will be if the consensus is clear." – JoshuaZ (talk) 20:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Note: JoshuaZ again slandered me and plain lied: I didn’t say the editors of Wikipedia were childish, as in anyone who edits is childish, but THE MODERATORS (administrators).

Then JoshuaZ said:

"Also, I suggest you don’t use the edit summary "rebuke" indeed, the entire notion of rebuking editors with whom you disagree with is probably not a good one. I suggest you try to improve your attitude to be more cooperative with other editors. Wikipedia is not a battleground but a collective attempt to build an encyclopedia." – JoshuaZ (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

"probably"? JoshuaZ why would I care about your probablies? Who are you? And yet users like Griot were and are allowed to repeatedly harass and make insults (which are rebukes) against those who oppose them on Wikipedia. What a biased truth-hating hypocrite you are JoshuaZ. Stop babbling and stop lying.

And as for concensus, you idiot:

A Growing Concensus that Darwinists are Wrong

The Washington Times reports ‘a growing consensus’ among philosophers, intellectuals and scholars that atheism is in decline worldwide. But this does not mean that ‘re-Christianization’ is occurring—instead Flew and others merely believe in some form of intelligence behind the design of the universe.

The Washington Times, www.washtimes.com/world/20050303-115733-9519r.htm, March 9, 2005.

Or is the Washington Times not reliable JoshuaZ, will that be your next arbitrary excuse to supress the truths in the Bible?

Further, British philosopher Antony Flew, long renowned as ‘an intellectual ambassador of secular humanism’, is now a theist.

He said that it was impossible for evolution to account for the fact that a single cell can carry more data than all the volumes of the Encyclopaedia Britannica.
 

A Stupid Darwinist’s Stupid Explanation As To How Darwinism Can Be Compatible With Belief In God

January 25, 2009 Leave a comment

According to the Darwinist author of Fossil Legends of the First Americans, Adrienne Mayer, it would be more magnificant if God had let things evolve over millions of years rather than just created things and that the history of the universe "compressed" (yes, she and Ian The Moron Punnet said "compressed", as if Bible-believers taught that all life macro-evolved in 6000 years) into 6000 years is "not scientific but faith-based". Question for the Fossil Legend woman, who is a non-scientists she said: What the Hell does your opinion that brutish savage stupidity for millions of years is more glorious than God creating all living things as perfectly healthy, and building into them the ability to multiply rapidly into incredibly beautifully varied forms and still able to survive wonderfully, and still able to reproduce with one another, have to do with the Bible not being scientific for teaching that the universe is about 6000 years old? So what were you saying about "more amazing" and faith? So you really think that billions of unobservable years, billions of years you will never ever see, but can only barely and boringly imagine, of repetitive brutal killing and pointless storms and earthquakes, and pointless mass extinctions (and humans deliberately and stupidly causing extinctions of types of animals) is more wonderful than DELIBERATE DESIGN OF UNSEARCHABLY COMPLEX AND VERY BEAUTIFUL LIVING CREATURES ABLE TO SURVIVE DESPITE AND BY MAJOR MUTATIONS AND A DELIBERATE WORLD-WIDE FLOOD NEARLY ENDING ALL LAND-DWELLING LIFE ON EARTH? You’re that confused huh? So you’re so vain as to believe that you have the patience for billions of years of repetition that you’ll never see, and an evolutionary process you can’t explain logically, nor can Darwinist scientists, to pass before a HUMAN comes into being, a human that is far wiser than animal, able to write books like you have? So billions of years of brutal dumb-dumb repetition is more exciting to you then a perfectly wise and perfectly loving, and just being loving creating perfectly healthy, perfectly loving, super-beautiful and super-complex beings which were programmed with fantastic wisdom to survive on their own? You must hate creation then! You must hate writing books, teaching, technology, robots, robotics, artificial intelligence, and wisdom. Much better to you is billions of years of brutality than speed and peaceful constructiveness! Truly you are just as you claim: brutish animals which use lies to survive. You said it. I’m bored, I wanna go watch some animals brutality kill each other! Wanna watch a lion crush a Zebra’s neck with me? Or lets watch some soldiers bomb civilians! Survival of the fittest! Yaaaaaay! Wooooooh hooo, exciting! Come on lets have some blood-spattering, flesh-ripping, war-mongering, earthquake-killing fun for the next infinite years! Don’t come back Mr. God now ya hear! Yahear me God!? It would be boring if you came back and ruined this cool exciting and evolution stuff! Leave us alone to evolve and learn on our own you stupid boring God! You’re more exciting God if you just sit back and watch and do nothing! Yeah, that’s excitement, you doing nothing! Just go away, vanish, stop existing!

You atheists and Bible-doubting, liberal self-proclaimed "Christians" sure make sense huh? Not. So you want "proof" that God exists by seeing him, and yet say it’s more exciting if God has nothing to do with anything. What disgusting confused hypocrites you are. You truly do damn God and his followers no matter what they do or say. You are truly mentally ill and morally insane.