Muslim Men May Use Acid Attacks To Punish Sexual-Rejection

Note: “ISLAM” MEANS, “SUBMISSION”, NOT, “PEACE”.

Click here to watch videos on how many plastic surgeries it took some of these women to get to look like what some of them do now in those pictures, yes: the damage was so bad that even after multiple major facial operations they still look like that. I don’t say that to insult them or make them feel worse, but to let everyone know how demonic and incredibly damaging this crime is. It’s as if death were thrown on these women and children and men.

Acid attack on boy who ‘refused sex with Muslim cleric
by Massoud Ansari in Karachi
2/8/2004/12:01 A.M. GMT

On his hospital bed last week, 16-year-old Abid Tanoli sat listless and alone, half of his body covered by burns that all but destroyed both his eyes and left his face horribly disfigured.

The teenager talked, with difficulty, of how his life had been destroyed since the fateful day in June 2002 when he refused to have sex with his teacher at a religious school in Pakistan.

The boy was horrifically injured in an acid attack after he rebuffed the Muslim cleric’s sexual advances. Now, he has alarmed Pakistan’s powerful religious establishment by pressing charges against his alleged assailants.

A teacher at the school, who cannot be named for legal reasons, and two of his friends are in prison awaiting trial for attempted murder and rape. All three deny the charges. A fourth alleged attacker is still at large.

It is the first such case to be brought against a Muslim cleric and threatens to expose a scandal of sex abuse within Pakistan’s secretive Islamic schools. – More here.

ACID ATTACKS ON WOMEN AND GIRLS are increasingly common in the Muslim world
8/25/2009

When we hear the words Islamic Terrorism, we may think about suicide missions, mustard gas, the World trade centre blowing up, and hotel bombings. But men have found another way to pass on their control and power.

And this unspeakable, uncontrolled practice is called: “Acid Attacks”. … Fozila was attacked because she refused a marriage proposal. Hasina was set upon after an argument over a bucket of water. Two women in the seething Bangladesh capital Dhaka whose lives changed in a blinding flash. They were attacked with acid.

Last year in Bangladesh there were 179 recorded cases of acid attacks. Hydrochloric and nitric acid are cheap and readily available – used by the gallon in the grimy jewellery workshops in the backstreets of the city. In the wrong hands though, it can be devastating. Eating quickly through skin and bone and doing irreparable damage. The victims are targeted usually over land disputes or spurned advances. – More here.

Afghan journalist injured in acid attack
from the CNN Wire Staff
1/2011/ 2:16 P.M. ET

An Afghan journalist suffered first-degree burns in an acid attack in the capital earlier this week, a report said.

Razaq Mamoon is a writer and television presenter, according to Reporters Without Borders, a media rights organization.

Mamoon was attacked with acid Tuesday night as he left home, the group said. He is hospitalized with nonlife-threatening injuries.

A suspect, identified only as Rafiullah, has been arrested, the Interior Ministry said Friday.

Reporters Without Borders is urging the Afghan government to fully investigate the attack.

“We have already identified a dozen or so cases of violence against Afghan journalists for 2011,” the group said. “The authors and originators of this barbarous act must be swiftly identified and arrested.”

Acid attacks on journalists are not common in the country, according to NIA, an Afghan organization that protects journalists. – Source

Muslims just keep stooping lower and lower. What is next, peeing on and throwing their feces at those who disagree with their religion? Or throwing acid on them too? Truly a person’s beliefs about right from wrong do matter, whether they are a Muslim, Christian, Hindu witch, agnostic or atheist.

State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron
from the BBC
2/2011/13:55 ET

David Cameron has criticised “state multiculturalism” in his first speech as prime minister on radicalisation and the causes of terrorism.

At a security conference in Munich, he argued the UK needed a stronger national identity to prevent people turning to all kinds of extremism. …

In the speech, Mr Cameron drew a clear distinction between Islam the religion and what he described as “Islamist extremism” – a political ideology he said attracted people who feel “rootless” within their own countries.

“We need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing,” he said.

My Commentary:

What is, “extremism”? The extremists are you anti-Christians, who take evil to the extreme, like these Muslims who throw acid on women and children, and now news reporters.

“Beyond a norm in views or actions”, and what is the “norm”? Even in ancient Islamic practices do we find Muslims waging war on each other for whatever reason. In Catholicism were extreme acts like the poorly named “Piedmont Easter” event which should be called The Catholic Rape and Massacre of True Christians/Waldensians (other references: (1) (2)(3)(4)). You can judge a tree by it’s fruit. If it’s s fruit mostly bad, or it has nothing good, and fertilizer doesn’t help even, you know it is bad, or so diseased it isn’t worth saving. Likewise, a violent and hypocritical culture or religion, one that keeps murdering it’s babies or before they are even born–how can it be “good”? What are they doing having babies in the first place if they cannot handle them or plan on murdering them as a solution for having reckless sex? If we drill down in the various religions of the world to see which are mainly serene and peaceful, either cold (not much fruit, but still there) or hot (much good works), those with spiritual eyes that are not blind would see, if God was willing, that it is the traditional Baptists and Presbyterians who are the true church. They accept the Bible as God’s word and do not attempt to manipulate it with made up traditions and false teachings like that the apostle Peter is the foundation of the Church and use imaginary evidence and wishful thinking as support for such teachings and ignoring various Scriptures to hide the facts. Muslims do the same: ignore the Bible or only teach the parts that agree with their religion (so they, the Catholics too, take the Bible out of context, and effectively break it’s law then to not take away or add to God’s word).