Archive

Posts Tagged ‘abortion’

23 Signs of the Last Days Before Christ’s Return

September 1, 2017 Leave a comment

1. Serial Killers/massive murder counts by psychopaths including mass abortions/baby-murdering

2. Narcissists everywhere, both homeless/poverty stricken and wealthy in leadership positions

3. Casual and legalized prostitution, pornagraphy, homosexuality and homosexual marraige (mass sexual immorality)

4. Punishment and persecution of those refusing to facilitate homosexuality

5. Teaching children that homosexuality is normal, good and desirable

6. Sexual confusion and delusion as to sex as in rejection that males and females are what tbey are and can be a sex of their choice and should change it if they claim to feel “confused” and persecution and punishment of straight persons who engage in romantic or sexual relations with “underage” (a subjective term) persons and anyone “older” (subjective term) who does so with anyone even a year younger (yes, a mere year in dating difference can cause some humans to be filled with self-righteous demonic hate)

7. Mass pandering (teachers, judges, police, business owners, doctors and leaders pretending they believe in sex-changing for profit, advancement and to avoid persecution (similar to false Christians rejecting Christ out of fear of persecution)

8. Policies and laws driven by bribes, profit motive, advancement, fear of others in power, and sexual lust so that homosexuality and porography are legal, certain drugs and industrial chemicals not (like bans on alcohol, marijuana, hemp, chlorofluorocarbons, DDT) and bans on having unsterilized cats or dogs or more than one child) and those who oppose it are persecuted and punished

9. Greater concern showed for stupid animals and animals in general more than humans, even good human children, so that tax payer money is devoted to spaying and neutering animals rather than to help impoverished and disabled humans or diseased children and so that humans are punished sometimes severely for harming their own animal or making it uncomfortable

10. Laws based on feelings and subjectivity rather than reason and God’s commands, like judging a person made an animal uncomfortable or tortured or unsafe because someone feels it was so

11. Disrespect for property rights, examples the Civil War and persecution of impoverished persons who care for and own animals or those who make animal zoos (comsider what has happened to Sea World and the cattle, poultry and swine businesses – note: I do not condone cruelty to animals but do condemn placing animal welfare above human welfare, it is anti-human, inhuman and morally backwards, like abortion)

12. Cruel treatment of animals (endless examples including in the businesses I mentioned) and serial abuse and murders of animals including by animal control officers and vetrinarians

13. Mass lawlessness: mass thefts of everything and anything, mass sexual abuse, mass murders and torturings (like in the American jail/prison system, North Korea and Muslim dominated countries), and casual and mass police and leadership corruption (police steal, endanger lives, bully, harass, take bribes, phsyically abuse and lie continually), consider also lawless countries and cities where police have little power or are unwilling to enforce law like in Guatemala, Mexico, Sweden, Germany, Britain, Las Vegas, Saint Louis, Chicago etc., consider also massive numbers of violent gangs  Lawlessness is also due to the poor lacking the money to sue and defend themselves.

14. Mass drug addiction

15. Forbidding children to work, adding to mass impoverishment, child prostitution and abuse at home and punishing those who employ children

16. Stealth and open racism, discrimination of the poor and Christians

17. Extremely violent murders (bombings by American and other NATO soldiers and Muslims) and extremely sadistic (decapitations, skinning, eye-gouging, bombing, stoning and decapitating children)

18. Protection of evil speech and destructive heresies (liberals, libertarians and conservatives all protect evil speech, though liberals are hypocritical and inconsistent about it)

19. Lying for profit and out of bitterness against God (the lies that promote evolution, panspermia, big bang and steady state theories and in the food and medical subjects like that saturated fat is bad, marijuana is bad)

20. Mass endangerment of lives for profit (using high fructose syrup and hydrogenation) that lead to diabetes and cancer in high consumption

21. Mass stupidity (endless examples, one is using the word “racism” or “racist” to describe someone against Islam or “phobic/Islamphobic” which is of course a backhanded conniving insult like calling a Christian “homophobic” (persecuting the Christian to get them to be silent or agree with the one bullying them).

22. Mass atheism, mass godlessness, one might say Buddhists are godless however many if not all worship Buddha, which is nonsensical since his identity/self according to Buddhism shouldn’t exist since he attained “nirvana”, a Buddhist version of perfection, but such blindness, confusion and hypocrisy is to be expected of cults, including man-centered ones (that includes Islam, Catholocism, New Ageism and Mormonism

23. Mass divorce

Advertisements

Liberal Scientists Murder Healthy Baby Natasha, Because ”She Was Handicapped”

February 27, 2012 Leave a comment

Aborted baby lived 45 minutes, but still deliberately terminated by doctors.

2/27/2012 5:52 P.M:

I had a realization about five minutes ago: If abortion supporters justify abortion, the murder of a baby on the inside of another human’s body by saying, “A woman has the right to do what she wants with her own body” or “We have the right to…” then using that logic shouldn’t they also approve of murdering people outside of their own body, since they say they can do what they want with their body? Because doing whatever you want would include ANYTHING, not just anything TO YOUR OWN BODY. And so they should also approve of taking whatever drug we want to, eating whatever we want to, suicide and external torture of others, murder (murdering people outside the body), torture and death penalties. Further evidence of their contradictory justification and hypocrisy is if they claim they simply have been poorly wording their justification and meant what I stated here, which is “OWN BODY” they would be evidently lying, since pro-abortionists ALWAYS SUPPORT using ANOTHER HUMAN to murder the baby OF ANOTHER HUMAN, in other words, using someone elses help, like a practiced abortionist or using the help of the one who got them pregnant if no one else will. No pro-choice person as far as I know in my my long experience in life, has ever said, “You should abort your own baby by yourself.” Although I am sure there are people who though supporting “a woman’s right to choose” who wouldn’t, and who would say something like, “You let yourself get pregnant, be responsible for killing your own baby then and don’t involve someone else who had nothing to do with it, except probably in the case of rape.” But, I no of no one who has ever said that, so I am confident to say all abortion-supporters are contradictory hypocrites who support the worst kind of murder: murdering a defenseless baby while it’s still being formed within it’s mother. Not even attempting to kill a child who can run, and who can be argued has already committed some bad sins, by being unthankful to its parents after a few years of kindness, and being a trouble-maker, but a baby who has barely had a chance to live, who hasn’t even breathed air yet.

Further, it’s now a known fact that most people abort a baby out of “convenience,” making these abortion-supporters all the more evil, since the majority of them aren’t doing it for some noble reason like they might want Christians to think, like, “To keep the population down, so others can live without starving and being in great pain, and to keep people from living miserably from being very poor and being oppressed by the rich,” no, it’s so, “I can live more comfortably.” So, a brutal murder of the most least bad humans of all so you can afford more barbecue or tofu, soy milk, have more carefree sex, parties, relaxation, sleep, an easier time in school and a better social life, just forget about the person you murdered or about to be murdered never getting to experience those things on Earth. And how convenient for the ones that believe in reincarnation: “It’ll be someone elses problem, and eventually someone won’t abort them and they will be born to a well-off family or someone who is willing to suffer dealing with a kid.” And some, especially atheists, justify baby-murder as “punishment of rapists” (and rapists care? all rapists? rapists aren’t interested in sex it’s about making babies?). Using that logic how can they then bash God and the Bible for “punishing the children for the sins of their fathers” as he once did, or punishing anyone to teach someone else “a lesson” or scare them or punish them somehow so they won’t “sin” again? And how hypocritical for the abortion supporters who condemn capitalism and living an “excessive” life-style and who believe in being one with nature, who justify abortion for “convenience”; I’m sure hypocrites like that exist because I encounter incredibly stupid, hypocritical and contradictory people often. There is another point of hypocrisy with pro-choicers: Why do they say, “It’s a woman’s right to choose” rather than “It’s a female’s right to choose” being that as far as I’ve read and heard, they also support the right of a 12 year old to abort her baby. And being that they support that, and being that many of them also support homosexual (gay and lesbian) preteen sex, shouldn’t they also support the right of pre-teens to have sex whenever they want to, and with anyone of any age? Why y if they can “choose their own sexuality, have sex with the same sex while still a preteen, and brutally murder their own baby while it’s even still inside of them without their parents consent” would it be “a sin” or “immoral” or “unethical” or “bad karma” as all these confused and confusing groups say, who can hardly get along with each other at times, draw the line at a pre-teen or teen having sex with someone one or two years older or younger or much older or younger, at some age difference that they can’t agree on? Many don’t even realize that marrying age laws differ from state to state and country to country, and that they simply believe what they do due to cult-like brainwashing and blindly and arbitrarily following perverted old men and women in the government (and the lobbyists who bribe them) who hate them or believe that they are superior to them. They sure do love to oppose them though when these old perverted men when it comes to religion in public and private (free speech issues), same-sex sexuality issues, saving “nature” and baby-killing (and baby killing is okay for many liberal “save the trees, chickens, cows and Lady Gaga” people), but uh oh, bad if a kid wants to have sex with an adult. And many conservatives, libertarians and liberals think or say they think that that isn’t possible, maybe because they’ve been living in underground caves watching CNN, Fox News or Nickelodeon all day and were ugly all throughout their childhood and young adult years and their parents had them playing with stupid toys or studying all day. Either they are pretending they don’t think it’s possible out of some collective paranoia, or they really are that stupid, ignorant and unaware of the obvious. And why for those who call preteens and people up to 21 even, “kids” do they approve of them doing drugs, aborting, and having sex, but just not with someone some arbitrary number of years younger or older than them?! And if they are so against Christians judging others, and saying who should be able to have sex with who, let alone murdering a bay being right or not, why then do they often become infuriated at the thought of a “kid” having sex with an adult or even just flirting with one, or “worse”, if the adult flirts back or allows the kid to have sex with them? Why the crazy standards? Can anyone explain away all these hypocritical standards and judgments? Only a stupid, arrogant, evil person who didn’t bother to read this article carefully would believe they could.

Clearly, to those who aren’t spiritually blind, pro-abortionists have exchanged God for temporary comfort and truth for ignorant “bliss” and have seared their conscience and deluded themselves into thinking to murder the innocent for whatever reason is better than being inconvenienced and struggling in life, and as a result are callous, cold-hearted, shallow and deeply confused.

Categories: abortion, homosexuality, Homosexuals, junk science, karma, liberalism, liberals, Mainstream Science, preteen and teen sexuality, sexuality Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Alex Jones Partners With Con Man David Icke

February 23, 2010 5 comments

A few days ago Alex Jones had David Icke on, a man who was humiliated in Britain for his claim to be the Son of God (as in Jesus Christ). Most likely, to hide his shame, he decided to play fault-finder and increase his wisdom about the world. David Icke is known by hundreds of thousands of people for his claim that the world is being ruled by Satanic reptilian aliens who commit the evil of being attracted to human children and torturing them in extremely horrible ways (an obvious attempt to take advantage of people’s fears of people who find children sexually attractive (and probably the supposed honorable side of criminals in prison even, who pride themselves on being better than “pedophiles”), and to appear to be an angel of light by doing so). David Icke also teaches that most people have a false reality, in that they don’t realize what they are living in is a deceptive hologram (he no doubt read or heard of the old book (A Holographic Universe), for over a year now at least. That’s his fancy way of saying, “The world is brainwashed” in order to appear wise.

On the 18th, Icke was on the Alex Jones show, and said something that Alex no doubt hated, which was, “We don’t need to defend ourselves”, which is an absurd statement, and contradicts Icke’s own teachings to protect yourselves from Reptilian brain-programming, and your children from being kidnapped and tortured by them, yet Alex didn’t disagree, no doubt pandering to Icke because of Icke’s large following. On the 22, Alex started talking about how things were worse than he had predicted, much worse, and said that he was holding back information. Then he said, “That’s right ladies and gentleman, I’m holding information back. … The history we’ve been given is nothing close to reality. We’re living in a matrix of deception. The human brain is a computer…” Sounds like he’s been reading Icke’s books or listening to Icke’s lectures or interviews, or both. Alex has further damaged his reputation with this false drama, and by having partnered with the con man Icke.

Alex also said that we wouldn’t believe what he knows, and that it’s so bad that they would forget the other things he talks about. But he implied that he doesn’t talk about it because he only publishes what he can document. Perhaps he meant that with his own eyes he’s seen things that he couldn’t document. Regardless, why can’t he say? He doesn’t have to name names. People say anecdotal things all the time. He even let David Icke, who makes absurd claims about Reptilians and the claim that there are Reptilian covens severely torturing children in mass all over the world, and yet Alex let him on his show. And what’s worse than over a million of babies every two years being cut up and thrown in the trash without even anesthetizing them first (and sometimes their own mothers are the ones directly murdering them, not just permitting the murder by an evil stranger)? Why then won’t Alex to spend a few minutes telling his anecdotes? So for Alex to have said he was holding back super-bad information makes him sound delusional or a liar using scare-tactics to scare people into action, or to worship him for his special secret knowledge. Alex Jones, though very honorable, is clearly suffering from narcissism, and making true Christians look bad by making silly side-comments and ranting.

When words are many, sin is not absent,
but he who holds his tongue is wise.

Proverbs 10:19

How Untrustworthy Is the American Congress and Why Are They So Stubborn?

Why are America’s highest leaders so evil? Why are they corrupt? (I leave out Ron Paul as evil  although he rejects creationism). Why are American’s highest leaders so stubborn? Think about this: When someone repeatedly commits severe crimes thereby repeatedly degrading themselves, do they become more willing to do good, like admitting when they are wrong, or do they become more cold-hearted and stubborn to doing good? What evil things have Congress (and President Obama was once a senator) and the President repeatedly promoted which would qualify as a severe crime? They’ve said it is good for parents to murder defenseless children before those children have even been born in order to protect themselves from those children. To those who are not evil this is a sick teaching and a nonsensical one. Of course the "protection" refers to children who if their mothers allow them to be born risk dying in the process, but there is no excuse for those women who know that giving birth has its risks, and those that commit murder against their babies who know this areeven more guilty then those who didn’t realize they could die giving birth.

God does not permit murder or give men or women to kill their babies or kids to save their own lives. It’s ironic that anti-Christians love to parade around the time when God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his only son Isaac, who not a baby, yet persecute Christians when the Christian preach against the murder of babies, and God didn’t even have Abraham sacrifice Isaac, but was merely testing them both to see if they would obey him as they should. Meanwhile anti-Christians and false Christians constantly murder their own children and those that aren’t theirs and think they are "good" and helping both those that they murder and the world. They imagine they are helping with silly excuses like, "We;re helping to keep population down," or "We’re punishing the rapists" (yeah you’re really punishing the rapists by murdering defenseless babies that they’ve abandoned and as if rapists go around to have kids instead of to satisfy their sexual desires – But I thought rape was an act of violence like Oprah and her supporters once said, not an act of procreation – can you make up your mind anti-Christians and fake Christians and stop making up contradictory excuses to murder babies?) or "We’re helping those babies and kids to not have a miserable life". Yeah: let’s all die before we’re born or when we’re facing a distressing situation so that we don’t have to face anymore – so much for "grow up", "evolution", and "progress", clearly pro-abortionists are confused hypocrites who they say "grow up" and say or imply that evolution and "progress" is a good thing.

So, would people who have been committing murder of or who have committed murder of defenseless innocent babies or those promoting the murder of the defenseless to make themselves personally feel better and to make the parents feel better and who claim they are doing good by doing so, would they be likely and easily and suddenly with joy admit they have done extreme evil for their murder/s of babies or promoting them? No, they try to hide their shame and justify their crimes, their sins, their disobedience. They try to remain ignorant, hoping to achieve bliss, they try to blank their minds, they try to forget, they try to "meditate" on nothing hoping to achieve "nirvana", they try to avoid "the truth" of what they are really like, and to do so they naturally avoid the source of truth or deny His existence, but the truth cannot be aborted and thrown into a trash can and buried. It cannot be mocked. It will take revenge, revenge on liars.