I just read a stupid attempt at refuting the watchmaker argument, getting past all the rambling irrelevant glitter the author, David R Schwartz filled his attempt at a rebuttal with, he said,
“If we say that life is designed, again, with what are we making the comparison?”
His argument is illogical because it’s a non sequitur, in other words, it makes zero sense. Imagine if a teacher presented a story to a student and the student, refusing to learn or accept the authority of the teacher, said to him, “How do I know this group of words you put together and call ‘A story’ was really arranged and not just randomly put together? I have nothing to compare it to, therefore it’s just a bunch of words.” Do you understand what the student is missing? The teacher has made two baseless propositions:
1. The student has assumed you can’t compare a story (an arrangement of words designed to convey understandable information) to anything that would indicate it’s a story. Wrong. You simply need a definition, an explanation, of what a story is. You don’t need to hold up to a child that doesn’t know what a story is an ANTI-STORY to help him understand what a story is, you simply explain what a story is and it would help of course to tell him one. You can also demonstrate what don’t count as stories, for example to read a nonsensical grouping of words. That could be said to be “random”, although there is no such thing as true randomness
2. He’s assumed there needs to be something random, something that is the complete opposite of disorder in order to recognize order.
3. There is no such thing is random, complete disorder, everything happens for a reason, the universe goes by physical laws that God made possible in some way. Even in the Bible, where God tells the story of the beginning of the universe, though he says that earth at first had no form, he doesn’t say, “It was moving around for no logical reason”, he is simply indicating it had no stable shape, not that there were no laws governing it’s movement.
4. The student’s argument is self-refuting. Using her logic, if you need complete disorder, randomness, to recognize order, the student could reply, “I have nothing to compare your words to or anything else, therefore I don’t recognize you, your authority, or anything you say as making sense.” Imagine if the student had two sons, and said to them, “Get your room in order, clean it up, organize.” Imagine if his kids replied, “As opposed to what? What’s the opposite of complete disorder? Therefore it’s ordered and there’s nothing to organize.” In other words the teacher’s argument is self-refuting. It contradicts, it makes no sense. The student is admitting there is design to the student by acknowledging that there is something to compare his story to by citing complete disorder: how, unless the teacher recognized order, would she know there was disorder, the opposite of it? So then he’s admitting she has the ability to measure the teacher’s story, to see if it’s designed, and not just designed, but understandable, and that there doesn’t need to be some example of complete disorder. This is what David A. Schwartz and other atheists like him do. They propose that you can’t recognize if there was a God who designed anything because there’s no OPPOSITE of design to compare to, when by their very words and every day actions, RECOGNIZING DESIGNS ALL AROUND THEM MADE BY THEMSELVES AND OTHERS OTHER THAN GOD, pretend they can’t recognize design IN NATURE, in other words, things not made by man or things other than God. That is a clear bias. Is David too stupid to recognize when he sees an idol, a statue, a clear picture of some common creature, or even some fanciful drawing of a cliche alien? Of course not. Ironically, in the Bible, God says not to make idols and points out that they can’t help you because they aren’t alive, have no functioning body parts. How much more than can we recognize that a living creature, like a human, is designed? That is how spiritually blind and arrogant people like David and other deliberate atheists are: they, in the face of the absolute obvious, endless obvious evidence, deny it, and smugly so, as if they were wiser than God himself, and that is a clear absurdity. But that is how blind people like David are, how deluded.
5. The student is also assuming THAT THERE IS something that isn’t designed. Who said there was? Why would there be an undesigned thing? There’s no reason to believe anything exists in such a state.
6. The student is also assuming that no one has an instinctive ability to recognize design, not even herself, or is suppressing her ability to do so by deluding himself (convincing herself something is true that isn’t).
7. The opposite of non-design is obvious: nothing, empty space. That is super obvious. What it comes down to is the basis for the atheists rejection of truth: “If I can’t see it, it must not exist.” So if the short sighted blind atheists can’t imagine what the opposite of design is, is too stupid to figure it out, if it’s not handed to him on a plate and singing to him, there must not be such a thing. This is truly the ultimate anti-scientific attitude, and why atheists make awful and unreliable scientists and philosophers. And you’ll fine few who claim to be a theologian because of the heavily illogical mindset. They may give a shallow appearance of being logical, but it’s smoke and mirrors, shallow imitation based on mere claims using somewhat to very fancy words, boasting and insults as the smoke and mirrors.
David went on to say, “All that is non-life? OK, but then we would still have to say that all non-life is not designed.”
Here David has made a nonsensical assumption, why would “we still have to say all non-life isn’t designed”? I don’t have to say it, David is merely making the claim I have to say it. If David sees a cloud, a beautiful cloud, if he’s saying “It’s a beautiful day,” what is forcing him to conclude the day wasn’t designed? And further, how can he recognize beauty, beautiful as opposed to what? What makes a thing, “beautiful”? Design.
Then he said, “But suppose we say that the entire universe is designed. Well, we don’t have another universe to compare ours to, and as Hume points out, that’s exactly the problem. We only have experience with one universe, and unless we have the opportunity to examine other universes (if they exist, of course), we cannot say with any degree of certainty that our universe is designed,”
Here David has committed another non sequitur, meaning, a completely nonsensical statement. He’s said that because we have no universes to compare ours to, we can’t say it’s designed. And why is that? As I explained above with the teacher and her student example, there is no reason to make that conclusion. David is proposing a nonsensical method to determine design. He might as well have said, “Unless I have a non-statue to compare this statue to, we can’t recognize statues” or, “Unless I have a non-planet to compare this planet to, we can’t recognize planets,” or even, “Unless there’s a flying banana with thirty eyes in it, I can’t recognize design.” Absurd, stupid, illogical, nonsense.
Then he goes on to say, “nor do we have any reason to believe it is in the first place.” Here you who are in your right mind can see David simply denying the endless evidence for creation, and “speaking for all”, speaking for intelligent design scientists and creationists and everyone else on the planet who doesn’t give in to his will and beliefs. That is a strong indicator of not just his extreme blindness, or arrogance, but that he’s delusional. He’s the type who pretends he can’t type into a search engine, “Bible, evidence” or pick up a book showing evidence for design in a book store or library or that none have any without bothering to read them. In other words, he’s am arrogant moron and a bitter liar. He has such a deep hatred for God and authority, his mind doesn’t even come up with the thought to do an honest study, to look around with sincerity, to do tough research without assumption, but rather to search only for, if at all, “Evidence against the Bible”, or “Proof there’s no design,” in other words, to start out biased and look only to confirm his bias and assumptions.
And in the end, David and other atheists ALWAYS fail the morality test: If there is no God, what is truly moral and why would lying be wrong if there’s no God to say, “This is wrong, it’s not good”? No atheist can say, “I am right as to what is right or wrong, listen to me, I am the one from whom all truth can be known.” Or “Believe my atheist friend here, or Buddha, he’s the right one that never lies and only says what is true,” or “It’s whatever you feel like is right.” Problem: everyone in their right mind recognizes no one person can be counted on as determining good from evil, no one, everyone is flawed. So then, if we are all morally untrustworthy FOR TRUTH, how can David or other atheists be believed about the nature of the universe or anything in it when they resort to making a clearly wrong claim about how ultimate knowledge of goodness can be discovered through someone other than God? In other words: If atheists are morally confused about what is GOOD to do or deny there is good or evil/moral right from wrong, like whether or not it’s good to lie or not, how can they be trusted with basic truths like who made if anyone, the universe? The simple and logical answer is: They can’t be trusted. That is why David in his arguments against things like the Watchmaker argument doesn’t make logical sense. And in my opinion, that is why the mentally ill narcissist Richard Dawkins resorts to making a conniving attack against God by subversively referring to him as a blind watchmaker, knowing that God or his children refer to atheists as blind themselves. Some may argue that wasn’t Dawkins’ intent by making a book title with that name, but believe he was insulting God by referring to him as an imperfect designer (atheists don’t believe anything in this universe was designed perfectly or excellently, and when they do, will find fault with something about the design or claim it could be better somehow). At the very least, Dawkins was calling God’s designs imperfect by attributing nature to coming up with imperfect designs.
Update: At 2:32 AM, about to check out some camera advertised on the net, I accidentally saw David’s profile again, and I noticed this time how he described himself. The first word in his description is, “bitter”. The second to last is, “worried”. I hope he doesn’t want to die that way, risking feeling worse for all eternity.
Some notes on yet more hypocrisy and insanity I’ve encountered from atheists, who many atheists claim merely by being an atheists makes them superior to anyone religious both morally and mentally. Let’s see: Yesterday night at about 10 I went to an atheist acquaintance to ask if I could use his vaccuum for 30 mins in exchange for a six back of beer, he said, “Sorry that desert dust isn’t good for the vacuum”, which he merely assumed was everywhere when he went into my apartment DRUNK, and HIGH and which I discovered while cleaning this morning had throw his cigarette onto my carpet, leaving it there for over a month, and this, after helping himself to SHOVING ASIDE SOME EASILY DAMAGED ROCKS I PUT ON MY KITCHEN COUNTER TO DISPLAY, then subjecting me to 20 minute begging session in which he begged me every which way for a recumbent bike I had bought, which he kept insisting I found rather than bought as I said I did, for no reason. This is the same moron I wrote about here that claimed I made his tarantula sick by putting it in a back of Doritos by the way. So back to me at his apartment: So then I offer him a six pack of beer, and he says, “Hell naw, I wouldn’t do it for a six pack of beer” or something about like that. Oh and, he was high again, and when I had come to his door and he didn’t open right away, I figured he couldn’t hear me because I minute passed and all I could hear was nonstop babble, so I shout his name softly right as he comes out and he says, “Yo don’t do that, there’s too much weird shit going around here, police asking me about homeless people, you have too much weird shit going on with you.” Well what that is about is A MONTH AGO, yes ONE MONTH AGO, I pointed out to him as he was pushing a guy in a wheelchair around, that some homeless people had harassed me, and he said, “I’ll stick around to see the cops mess with some homeless people,” and acted all happy about it, then went away. So I figure he was sitting out on his steps smoking as he usually does and a few days later maybe some cop or cops asked him about the incident. So over that he’s paranoid? Idiot. And then about the vacuum says, “Besides, it’s my girl’s vacuum and it cost forty three dollars.” WOW A WHOLE $43 JARED!? WOW. And why then didn’t he ask his “girl” if I could use it? Why was he speaking for her and not letting her know? So then I walk away and he says, “Sorry dog, I’ll let you use it for that bike though,” a bike that I repeatedly told him cost me $154, which he repeatedly said would take off my hands for $25, and then fix it up and, “You know what I would do with this thing? I could fix this thing up and I would cruise all over the place with it.” Yeah, so you can fix it up for nothing and then joy ride with it while I’m stuck with no to shitty transportation, atheist.
So then I go to dump out the vacuum a kind neighbor let me borrow last night into the desert, and a homeless woman who was flirting with me the day before by showing off the side of her breast to me boldly, gross – not that it was ugly but the rest of her was – a woman I’d repeatedly helped, and even the day before gave a near unused in near excellent condition $145 fake Tony Hawk bmx too, who only recently moved in, who I’d offered to let stay at my place during the extreme cold, who I gave a LED lamp too and nice amount of firewood too, walks up to me after I tell her I’m dumping out a vacuum to retrieve rocks I accidentally sucked into it, and starts whining about the shreds of paper and a few pieces of foam that came out, without me even saying I’d leave it there. I then tell her half jokingly that the Bible says to subdue the earth, and she says, “It does not say “subue”!” and argues about that, yes, argued, and I tell her “there’s like 50 translations that use that word,” and she then says, “Well they’re all wrong, they used the wrong word!” This is an atheist who maybe two weeks before said, “I’ve purged the Bible from my mind,” and seemed to get defensive when I told her that Jehovah’s Witnesses were a cult and promoted many false prophecies, to which she replied, “Only some did that,” yeah, that really makes it better, atheist. The point was, it’s a cult, their leaders put out false prophecies, and many no doubt promoted it and stuck with the cult despite that glaring bad fruit of the wolves in sheep’s clothing Jesus warned about.
I then tell I’ve picked up tons of plastic bags (I actually picked up a massive amount of trash and bagged it or put it in one spot and even DUG INTO THE GROUND WITH MY BARE HANDS TO GET AT SMALL SHARDS OF GLASS AND LARGE AMOUNTS OF VARIOUS KINDS OF FOAM AND OTHER GARBAGE to clean the desert! ONLY TO FIND OUT A LITERAL WITCH AND PSEUDO CHRISTIAN NAMED KATY, A SUPPOSED HERMAPHRODITE, A LESBIAN, WAS THE ONE BREAKING HER BEER BOTTLES IN THE AREA I WAS METICULOUSLY. CLEANING UP, EVEN AFTER I DID SO). And then to get rid of her tell her I’m going to bulldoze the place anyways. She then says, “That’s not good for the little creatures.” And I tell her there’s nothing around anyways, and she says, “Yes there is! There’s things around here!” Uh, no, there’s an occasional lizard and a bunch of sparse scrub and MASSIVE amount of glass everywhere. I told her one time I could make a rain cache and that she could of course use it, and she then like an unthankful brat says, “The water is dirty.” This is someone who boasted about being like a boyscout and made critical comments about two other homeless guys being nearby for being negative. So she can’t imagine how to filter the water, or getting a water filter?! Or asking me if I had one? Ridiculous. My point is, if the environment is so polluted that water from the sky instantly becomes too dirty to drink, the hell is she whining about “little creatures” in the desert for that that the water gets on of feeds on? Just shut up stupid atheist and stop being negative and preaching to me your liberal new age atheist environmentalist nonsense.
And then she, apparently boasting, says, “I pick up glass” (WHICH IS AROUND HER CAMP, WOW HOW CONVENIENT) and I tell her it’s a waste of time because you could just bulldoze it. And it takes up way more energy to pick it up by hand, or rather would if you attempted to clean up all the places it was in (especially when it just comes back because of repeated vandalism) because you could just bulldoze it. I then remind her indirectly that I gave her that bike, and had given her a missing bolt to it and she says, “Did you leave it on the bike?!” in a whiny hurt way. Wow, so all over a few shreds of paper dumped in a little ditch that you could easily get rid of, including by fire, that the sun would degrade into easily destroyed particles? What an idiot.
I can’t remember how, but she worked in Hurricane Sandy into her argument, because she said to me something about mother nature kicking everyone off the planet, to which I replied, “There’s 5 billion people on the planet, no one is being kicked off” and she said, “Oh yeah?! What was Hurricane Sandy?! There’s no one living there [New Jersey and New York she meant I guess], to which I replied, “There’s tons of people still living there.” That temporarily shut her up. This hypocrite by the way uses technology of course, technology she claims is bad for the planet. She reminds of other liberal hypocrites who claim the current population is bad Earth, that technology is bad, and yet use their self and technology to spread that message rather than killing themselves for the betterment of the world. It’s no different then liberals and fake Christians and other atheists who when you point out a contradiction they are making about God or some immoral behavior or speech of theirs, something hypocritical, reply, “You can’t judge, stop being critical, you’re so judgmental, Jesus said, ‘Don’t judge’, you should listen to your own Bible,” and yet that speech shows a negative attitude and is “judgmental” itself, yet another contradiction.
Like many would no doubt say who read this, “She’s homeless for a reason.” Here’s two obvious ones: Atheism and liberalism. By the way, she claimed her husband committed suicide, without a sound of sadness in her voice, and not long after the Sandy Hook massacre, asked her what she thought of it. And trying to sound wise, with a pretentious wise woman look, said, “They knew they were gonna die,” non nonchalantly, “they wanted to die.” She believes in karma which is why she was saying that. She also claimed earlier with a sly pretentious wise woman sounding voice, “I’ve studied religion for 45 years” (she’s no older than 40) and that that’s and that “the Hindu calendar ends on the same day; that can’t be a coincidence” for why something big would happen on December 23, 2012. Yes, she fell for the fake Mayan prophecy. And when I came on Christmas to ask if Miss Theologian of 45 Years Who Was Duped by a Fake New Age/Scammer Prophecy” wanted to stay over, remained silent under her tarp bed cover, as if I couldn’t tell she was awake. Yep, atheist.
And from a social media site here, from beginning to end, is a in order series of messages I sent to a Jewish atheist (and I’m posting it all so you can see there was no reason for his attacking me, and I hadn’t talked to him at any other time in any other way during these messages except to comment on something he said to all his pathetic looking and sad amount of friends, that being, “skank it up bitches!” to get people to “like” (thumb up) his band. His failed band, which includes a guy who plays accordion. To that I said, “Lol you can’t force people to like your music”. So, here’s the conversation with this idiot atheist and Satanist:
Conversation started October 30, 2012
hey whats up man
nada, just watching some QI
it’s a crazy british trivia show my GF showed me
do you have a messenger? [a small deleted sentence came after this one, deleted for privacy reasons]
they never really answer the questions, but the banter is great
i haven’t used messengers in a while
let me see if i can log in to any
yahoo refuses to stop starting up, msn has that big ugly add, they always ruin themselves
ad i mean
i never used yahoo, i was a windows/aim guy
or what they call their news thing
i just used aim recently, just to add some people, who apparently haven’t been on for many years
anyways when you’re not busy having a good time, give your msn email
i dont want to interrupt you right now
[a deleted email was here]
it can wait
oh by the way how good are you at the flute?
i’d pay for a cover of various songs like at a party if you can play well
flute i’m ok, and i can’tplaystring harp, but i can rock the harmonica
like… a song from Conan the Barbarian…
lol conan on harmonica…
maybe i wud pay for that, that would be cool
ok well ill email u and email me back for a time better for u seeya
“A Plea of No Contest is not an admission of guilt, but is an admission to the truth of the facts alleged in the Complaint”
i just learned that!
is that true [deleted] ?
So how [deleted] can it not be an admission, isn’t that contradictory?
oh my god
a no contest is you saying to the courts that you do not wish to fight it
[deleted for privacy reasons]
so it is seen as a tounge in cheek confession
yeah but what the heck[,] an admission that the facts aren’t in dispute? [a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]
this is a corrupt country
[a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]
maybe you can
[two sentences deleted for privacy reasons]
[a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]
[five sentences deleted for privacy reasons]
because our government does not care anymore for justice, they just want paychecks
and then i got mad cuz [a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]
so my dad claimed tho he said he may have remembered wrong
so i was angry and emailed him saying [partial sentence deleted for privacy reasons]
because you know how that would look if someone discovered such an agreement
and plus i just never agreed, so i felt like im being punished after the fact
did you know that Zuckerberg moved out of the country hah?
damn man, [a sentence deleted for privacy reasons]
[link deleted for privacy reasons]
November 13, 2012
William, did you really “like” Walmart, or were you hacked or forced at gun point to do that…
I was working there at the time
I was just joking anyways.
Hey you wanna secede with me? I’m seceding to Yellow Stone National Forest, I’m taking it over man, all the natives in america agreed to help me… I made a spear from a stick I found on the ground, I found a nickel too!
You have ten seconds to decide.
William, don’t take this as flattery at all, but you’re too intelligent to be an atheist. I saw you liked Satanism. If you are Jewish you should remember that Hitler was an occultist, and that pagans don’t have a good reputation for morality. I read an ancient quote from some prominent Greek who said pagans didn’t care about the poor. The Greeks were also sexist as are the modern pagan Indians, aka Hindus as are the Taoists of China, who have very very low regard for females to the point where they kill them as babies. I’m sure you heard of China and now, India’s male to female ratio imbalance. In at least one large part of India, females are kidnapped for slaves, think about the irony of that. And remember I’m not a Catholic, a cult which is half-pagan, and I know you know their very bad reputation especially with regard to the treatment of children.
Sir, Please do me the respect of not trying to convert me to your ignorant ways, I am a man of reason whom has studied many of the worlds faiths, i was a christian worship leader at a methodist church, taught meditation seminars at the zen center of southern nevada, engaged in worship rituals with hebrews for passover, celebrated ramadan and shivaratra, but i have found that none of these paths are valid points of view in the grand scheme of the universe, DO NOT EVER TRY TO CONVERT ME or i will report you to FB for harassment
“DO NOT EVER TRY TO CONVERT ME or i will report you to FB for harassment” I didn’t know FB was the Judge and Arbiter of What Christians May Do. Can’t you think for yourself Will? Why are you so weak minded to me telling you something peaceful and that has nothing to do with force? See: as an atheist and as someone who has rejected God, you’ve become paranoid and easily angered and self obsessed. You can’t even be peaceful about others obeying their own religion in a peaceful way, but in your paranoid arrogance have become a living time bomb over what is normal in life. You, as you can read for yourself, have only made mere claims and resorted to the logical fallacy of “The louder I yell” and “I’ll tell mommy and daddy” or “I’ll tell government on you” but of course as you’ve told me you’ve become so hateful you can’t even stand government. So where do you turn to, absurdly, Facebook, which any idiot paying attention to the news knows works with the government, and stated they do so.
“The words of his mouth are wicked and deceitful; he has ceased to be wise and to do good.” – Psalm 36:3
You are a living example of what happens to those who reject God after having come to know him, they become unwise, delusional, paranoid, fearful of Hell so badly they strain at a gnat to avoid the thought of Hell like a hyper child. You’re also an example of what happens when you dedicate yourself to Arminian theology, that salvation can be lost and that your will is more important that God’s: inevitably, you lose your “salvation”, the false salvation you never had based on your will being superior to God’s. Of course you would have fallen away being that you had no faith in God to keep you as Jesus said he would do with a (true) child of God.
You’re become so irrational you worship a permanently half-defeated demon whose future has been clearly laid out by Christ: he’s doomed to suffer forever, and no doubt so badly, his only thought will be that he is in pain, barely aware of anyone else. And as everyone knows William, who isn’t deluded, Satan hates everyone, but his own demons, and he barely has any love or them obviously.
Methodism is a false form of Christianity, big surprise it couldn’t save you. And as for atheism and pagans again, tell me William who pretends to be against racism to the point where you claim to have beat Nazis, but who clearly simply loves violence, what did Hitler do or Israel, and are the pagan and atheist countries supporting Israel, or is it alone in it’s cause to rid itself a terrorist group?
You’ve become unwise and I’m thinking, you’ll always be this way now. You would do good to get on marijuana to keep yourself from going ballistic over little things.
And William, what are you so scared and furious about me trying to “convert you” if as you believed as a Methodist and Satanist who hates everything that your will is superior, that I can convert you? And as someone who thinks he’s superior to all, why does it turn you into a wrathful demon at hearing there mere mention of God? God doesn’t act that way when he hears about Satan, so how are you superior if you lack the patience and self-control God has?
I know i am superior to none, hence why i have no need to bring my beliefs to others, and i am agitated when others see me as a missionary project
Will, you talk like someone with narcissism disorder.
You say u don’t think you’re superior to anyone yet “i’m his missionary project”
When did you become my project? I didn’t know you were so important.
you don’t even know me. unfriend me
I sent you one small message not saying anything about Christ and you turn into Mohammed.
I don’t need to know everything about you, now you’re playing Mr. Hit and Run because you know you’ve made a mess here.
William doesn’t know how to say sorry.
And William doesn’t know how to read patiently, he sees a first sentence in disagreement with him and freaks out, as a narcissist does.
no, I choose not to engage on conversation with someone who sends me two paragraphs of hate speech about other faiths randomly
How was my speech “hate” Mr. I’m going to tell facebook on you for harassment over your little paragraph! Hail Satan!”?
You William are the hip-shooter.
You read a little, blow up mentally, send little jabs and think that’s rational.
and you continue conversations with people who tell you to leave them alone
The Bible says, which you never did know well clearly, “Ignore arguments of ignorance” and since you’re easily upset over little things and see everything as an attack that doesn’t agree with his Highnesses Will, then no point in reading your replies anymore.
one more message and you will be blocked
You can’t even stand to read my little replies, what then is the point in talking to you?
exactly, you are blocked
Okay guy who acts like a bratty girl, run now Mr. I Have Satan’s Power
Run now Satanist.
[Note: W. Neal also claimed to be an atheist, and in a paranoid manner and tone, when I started reading some lyrics her wrote out loud around a few people who I knew would care less, excitedly told me not to do so, because, "I'm an anarchist" and some "the government is out to get anarchists" like comment.
In conclusion, humanism, Satanism, atheism, liberalism and liberal environmentalism, all stupid and evil, and never trust a humanist, Satanist, atheist, liberal or liberal environmentalist, ever, except to be hypocritical, highly irritating, self-righteous, self-centered, easily offended and easily upset and arrogant.
Note: this is copyrighted, and use of it for profit, for example, in a sermon or employment application, advertisement, written material for sale or any other items, including clothing, requires the permission of the copyright holder.
“For the most divine knowledge is… most worthy of honor. … other sciences… are more necessary than [theology,] but none more excellent… For by theology you may find reason to continue living and even obtain eternal peace.” Said by Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher, over 321 years before the giving of eternal life, Christ, was born into a human body.
Aristotle was wrong. Knowing and understanding God is the most important thing, because, as he said, it is necessary for achieving eternal peace. “Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” “It is the spirit that quickens; the flesh profits nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.” – Yeshua, Christ
1) The emotional system (spiritual heart). How many types of emotions can a human feel? Where are the emotions being felt, what location? Do emotions have a color, smell, and can they be felt or directly seen? What is the maximum emotional intensity a person can feel without becoming insane? What causes emotions? Why do humans or animals have desires? Why aren’t humans non-emotional, and simply like programs in an unemotional machine? How is the mind able to be connected to the heart? What caused this connection? What caused self-awareness? What caused the connection of the mind to the brain? Why do humans have different types of personalities? Why do humans interact with happiness, anger or dislike for each other? Why do they have concern of any kind for anything at all, why are they curious about anything?
2) The mental system (mind). What is the cause of human thoughts? Why does a mind think, reason? Where is the will located? Why do humans have a will, rather than simply a program like a computer with no will, that needs to be directly made to do something to perform another function? How did the human mind obtain the ability to create thoughts in the human brain and move muscles by willing/wishing to do so? Is this some sort of psychokinesis? How is the mind able to reproduce sounds and other sensations it’s heard? What caused this ability? How is the heart able to be connected to the mind? What caused this connection? What caused the connection of the heart to the rest of the body’s sensory system and how is it connected to it? Why do all living things, when repeatedly harmed, tend towards an insane/chaotic/disordered/illogical way of life, except humans, which need a guide and training to live a religious/ordered/logical of life and?
3) The neurological system (brain, including spinal cord). How fast is the human brain? How fast is the human brain? How fast are individual brain cells/neurons? What is its maximum memory capacity? How fast can it store a memory? How many neurons does the average adult have? How many functions does the human brain have. Can a brain grow new brain cells? How many regulatory functions (how many systems in the human body) does the brain monitor and control and how complex is this task and how many neurons does it require for the brain to do so? How is the mind able to reproduce sounds and other sensations it’s heard? What caused this ability? Why don’t damage brain cells regenerate faster?
4) The digestive system. Is it simple or complex? How complex is it? How many types of food can be digested?
5) The lingual system. Where did language come from? How many languages can a person speak, how many types of tastes can the tongue taste, and how much heat can the human mouth withstand without being burned, or coldness, without being damaged? And how many types of chemicals can be put in the mouth, and at what level, without it being damaged, or beyond the point of healing, for example, pepper and toxic wastes from various types of bacteria?
6) The optical system (eyes). How many colors can the eye see, and how many mega pixels? How close and far away can optimal eyes see? How many different color combinations do eyes come in? What is the maximum amount of light a human eye can withstand without being damaged?
7) The nasal system (nose). How many smells are discernable? A small simple number? And how is it possible?
8) The touch system (skin and nerves), including sensations from body hairs, which also makes possible the euphoric feeling of feeling fine hair brush against skin and sexual contact.
9) The auditory system (ears). What is the frequency rance of hearing?
10) The nervous system (nerves, including spinal cord). How many nerves does the average human body have, and how many types of sensations can it feel, and to how many organs does it connect to and how fast can a nerve respond to a sensation?
11) The immune system. How are immune cells know how to defend themselves? Why do immune cells not attack each other, helpful bacteria, or the body they are within, or anything? Why do immune cells only attack specific things? Why is it never beneficial for an immune cell to mutate if mutations are what caused immune cells to reach their level of complexity and abilities to defend themselves and the human body against countless types of bacteria and non-living chemicals and be at peace with countless other types of chemicals? How did immune cells get their ability to communicate with each other and other cells?
12) The cardiovascular system (lungs, throat, nasal passage). How many functions are performed by this system and how complex is it compared to that of the simplest known life form?
13) The gastrointestinal system (gall bladder, pancreas, intestines). What are the functions of this system? How complex is this system, it’s total number of functions?
14) The circulatory system. What are the functions of this system? How complex is this system, it’s total number of functions?
15) The skeletal-musculatory system (bones and cartilage). How many bones are in the human body? How many muscles are in the human body? How complex is this system? How many bones does a human have? Why does the body reduce it’s number of bones over time? Why and how does the body know to reduce the number of bones in its body? Why isn’t the human body armored? Why aren’t human skeletons made of titanium or some other extremely strong and light metal? Why doesn’t the human skeletal system regenerate faster? How many total muscles are there in the human body? What is required for a human to balance itself when standing and what amount of programming is necessary for it to be able to walk and to run and to do so while turning its head from side to side or up and down or even with its eyes closed?
16) The hair texture, coloration and pattern. Why do humans have different varieties of hair types? How many different shades of human hair are there? Why is there curly, wavy and straight human hair rather than just one type? How long can human hair grow? What are the total number of functions of human hair? Why is scalp hair different from eyebrow hairs, mouth and chin and pubic hairs, why isn’t there just one type of hair texture? How many different texture types of human hair are there? What are the total number of human hair patterns, why do some humans have different hair covering patterns?
17) How many types of laws of physics does the human body operate by to function?
18) The sleep cycle. Why do humans sleep? What is the average length of time a human sleeps, and why? How did the human body get the ability to continue breathing, moving to keep from blood clotting and suffocation and keep from going to the bathroom, while sleeping, and ability to cease when a person needs to urinate or defecate?
19) The life cycle. Why do humans live on average 70 to 80 years, and at most 250 years? Why don’t humans live indefinitely or even longer, like turtles, alligators, crocodiles, Redwood and Joshua trees and other long-lived trees?
20) The human genetic system (genes, DNA and RNA). How complex is the human genetic system? How many total functions does the human genetic program contain? How does DNA and RNA cause certain molecules to form structures, or entire humans or perform tasks? What caused DNA to form?
21) The human reproductive system. Why are there male and female humans as opposed to non-sexual humans? How many functions do the reproductive systems have? How complex are the female and male human reproductive systems? Why does it take many months for a human to be born?
22) Why don’t human body parts regenerate faster and why only finger and toe tips and other small amounts of skin and muscle parts? Why does it regrow scar tissue instead of the former tissue?
23) Why are some living things born self-sufficient, like ants, bees, caterpillars, spiders, beetles, worms, bacteria, fungi, mushrooms, crabs after hatching, not needing a guide or training, and others needing them, like humans, apes, monkeys, dolphins, whales, birds, dogs, rodents, cats, scorpions, some crabs, elephants, rhinos, giraffes, pigs, cattle, goats and sheep? How do animals that require milk to feed know to suck on a teet for milk, or a baby human on a nipple for milk? How do animals know what to eat and drink? Why do animals run, hide, attack, pretend to be dead or stay still to avoid danger, even when very young? How did they learn to do these things? Why do most animals protect their eggs and angrily if they sense the eggs are in danger? Why do some animals show concern for each other, and others not? Why do some animals get along with other kinds of animals, and others not?
24) How many functions are there in Earth’s ecosystem? How complex is Earth’s ecosystem?
25) The second heaven: How many stars are there? How many planets are there? How many galaxies are there? How many stars far outside of galaxies exist? How many types of stars exist? How many types of planets are there? How many known physical universes are there?
26) What difference would it make if there was one galaxy containing all the stars, planets and comets in the universe, rather than none, and if no star or planet or comet ever diminished, or collided?
27) How many physical laws are there? How complex are all of these laws together, or what is the total amount of information of all of the known laws? How many letters or words would it take to list all of the laws and the total number of ways in which they affect other things?
28) What is science? Can science teach anyone anything?
29) What is religion? Can religion teach anyone anything?
30) What is a human? Can a human teach anyone anything?
31) What is an animal? Can an animal teach anyone anything?
32) What is the Bible? How many books are in the Bible? How many words are in the Bible? How many laws are in the Bible? What are the main laws of the Bible? How many events are in the Bible? When was the Bible written? How many different people are mentioned in the Bible? How many countries are named in the Bible? How many cities are named in the Bible? How many races are named in the Bible? How many languages are mentioned in the Bible? How many concepts are there mentioned in the Bible? How many emotions are mentioned in the Bible? Does the Bible say anywhere to reason? Does the Bible say anywhere to make judgments? Does the Bible mention anything similar to the scientific method? Does the Bible say anywhere to not assume things? Does the Bible anywhere say to take disobedience to God seriously? Does the Bible anywhere say not to take disobedience against God seriously? How seriously does the Bible say to take disobedience against God? What are three other words the Bible uses to describe disobedience to God?
33) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if there Bible was never written, besides people merely not knowing what the Bible was?
34) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if no one ever said what was true, besides that they always lied?
35) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if no one believed in any spiritual or alien being with the ability to imprison or kill any animal or human, besides that no one would believe in such beings?
36) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if no one ever made a judgment? Do you need to know the scientific method or perform it to know what would happen if no one ever made judgments?
37) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if if no one ever pointed out whenever someone lied, stole, murdered, showed hatred towards another person for an unjust reason, or never obeyed their parents?
38) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what the world would be like if everyone believed they were merely an animal, besides that everyone believed they were an animal, and not human?
39) Can you show, even by the scientific method, whether or not an animal is more important than a human, or if any living thing is more important than another? How do you measure “importance”?
40) Can you give twenty historical and twenty everyday examples of what most people would consider evil when humans believe they are merely animals and not beings who are responsible to a god or God?
41) Can you give twenty historical and twenty everyday examples of what most people would consider good when humans believe they are merely animals and not beings who are responsible to a god or God?
42) Can you give twenty historical and twenty everyday examples of what most people would consider good when humans believe they are responsible to a pagan god, including “Allah” and the Yahweh said to have only written the Old Testament?
43) Can you give twenty historical and twenty everyday examples of what most people would consider good when humans believe they are responsible to the Yahweh said to have written the Bible through humans?
44) What is a Catholic? How are they different from Calvinists?
45) Do you know the definition of all of what are commonly called “the major religions of the world” and the alleged origins of and a short history of each?
46) Do you know who the top 50 scientists of the world were, and what their religion or “way of life” was or that of their parents or ancestors?
47) Do you know who the inventor of the pyramid was, when and how all the known pyramids were built, how long it took to make the ones that still stand and what their functions were, or who made the first magnifying glass, microscope, telescope, hot air balloon, blimp, steam engine, gasoline engine, electric motor, modern battery, calculator, telephone, radio, light bulb, airplane, car, bicycle, motorcycle, skateboard, refrigerator, tape recorder, television, computer and satellite were, or of their parents or ancestors?
48) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what difference it would make if everyone believed that Earth was not the center of the universe or not?
49) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what difference it would make if everyone believed in Relativity?
50) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what difference it would make if everyone believed in abiogenesis?
51) Can you show, even by the scientific method, what difference it would make if everyone believed evolution?
52) How many generations of creatures would it take
53) How do you define beneficial, good and evil and why?
54) Is your definition of beneficial, good and evil the same as everyone of every culture, religion, philosophy, city or country?
55) What is the definition of “proof”?
56) What is the definition of “evidence”?
57) What is the definition of “fact”?
58) What is the definition of “truth”?
59) What is the definition of “transitional fossil”?
60) Did you realize how unfathomably complex this universe and the living things in it were? Do you know? How much more do you understand and why should I care? How much do you really know and understand, you who don’t believe in God, who believes the universe was always here, or came from an explosion, and that living things formed without intent and that at least one living thing turned into humans? Do you know and understand as much as you thought you did after reading these questions?
61) Are you my God? If you don’t believe in a god or God, should you tell me right from wrong or command me to do anything?
62) Is there any point in loving anything or getting angry at anything or being curious about anything?
63) What is “circular reasoning” and can you give examples of it?
Three more questions:
64) If evolution truly happened, than how many generations of creatures would it take, starting with the first ancestor of humans, and how long, to evolve into us unfathomably complex humans, along with our differing reproductive organs? Would it take a hundred years? A thousand? 10,000? 100,000? 1 million? 2 million? 50 million? 100 million? 500 million? 1 billion? 5 billion? 10 billion? 14.7 billion years? Think about how long it would take for everything to work out to get to us.
65) If there are no transitional fossils, due to Earth repeatedly having massive changes to its land and ocean scape, why are there many so called “living fossils” which haven’t changed from billions to millions of years? Examples: the giant triops, which the evolutionists at Wikipedia, headed by an atheist, deliberately erased from their triops article, even though a video of it was clearly shown and seen by hundreds of thousands of people? Did billions of people have to see it for it to be admitted what it was to be acceptable to the evolutionist, liberal, anti-Christian, narcissist atheists and greedy businessman who control Wikipedia? And that’s just one of many “living fossils”, which obviously aren’t living fossils, because there obviously is no such thing as evolution. It’s a made up story, believed or used by the bitter, the prideful, and cultists, like Mainstream Scientologists.
Would you like more questions to think about?
66) Animal behavior: Why do nearly blind scorpions, when repeatedly disturbed and not knowing where the location is of what disturbed it, stand tall while walking with their tails raised tall? Are they, which are nearly blind, thinking, “I will scare others with my height and the with the stinger and the poison in my stinger. I will cause them pain or kill them and eat them if they are small enough”? What’s your answer? How do birds know to keep their eggs warm, and at a certain temperature? Did other birds tell them, “It must kept at this amount of warmth, don’t let it get colder than this temperature”? So, who would you say is stupid and delusional? Who would you say is blind and hypocritical Who would you say is, “intellectually dishonest,” whatever that’s supposed to mean? Who would you say doesn’t think for themselves?
The 2 Peter 3 Prophecy
3 Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. 4 They will say, “Where is this ‘coming’ he promised? Ever since our ancestors died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation.” 5 But they deliberately forget that long ago by God’s word the heavens came into being and the earth was formed out of water and by water. 6 By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. 7 By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly. – NIV
The Romans 1 Prophecy:
18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator – NIV
The Prophecy Jeremiah Spoke to the Jews,
Concerning Their Punishment
This is what the Lord says:
“Stand at the crossroads and look;
ask for the ancient paths,
ask where the good way is,
and walk in it,
and you will find rest for your souls.
But you said, ‘We will not walk in it.’
I appointed watchmen over you and said,
‘Listen to the sound of the trumpet!’
But you said, ‘We will not listen.’
Therefore hear, you nations;
you who are witnesses,
observe what will happen to them.
Hear, you earth:
I am bringing disaster on this people,
the fruit of their schemes,
because they have not listened to my words
and have rejected my law.
What do I care about incense from Sheba
or sweet calamus from a distant land?
Your burnt offerings are not acceptable;
your sacrifices do not please me.”
Therefore this is what the Lord says:
“I will put obstacles before this people.
Parents and children alike will stumble over them;
neighbors and friends will perish.
The Mathematical Impossibility Of Evolution
Post link: http://goodbible.tk
Sociopaths, Psychopaths, Narcissists, anti-Christians and deliberate atheists love to say the Bible is evil and take verses out of context (which is no different then non-Jewish racists taking Jews out of the context of the world they live in to make themselves look righteous and superior). Everyone who had studied religion, especially Christianity, for a few years on the Internet will have come across a moron pulling out a verse and committing the fallacy of “begging the question” basically meaning “making no point” or adding “evil” and other denigrations to the end of the verse, as if that somehow explains everything (which is the same fallacy plus the fallacies of emotionalism and mere insult). It is as stupid as anyone including psychopaths, quoting, “Do not lie,” and then saying, “bad!” or “Don’t murder”; immoral!” A favorite Truth-denier attack of racists and atheists is to bring up God killing of many Amalekites, and adding that God killed women and children too. But again, they make no point. God gives and takes away life all the time, what about it? Are women superior to males that God shouldn’t take away their lives? Are kids necessarily superior to adults or more moral? Is a little haeful kid superior to a moral and self-controlled adult? And who said the Amalekites were superior to the Jews? What is the evidence they were better? Did God say, “I’m going to kill them merely because they aren’t Jews” or “I just don’t like them,” or “I’m going to kill them all because they wouldn’t let the Jews pass through this wasteland.” No he didn’t, and it’s not implied. In fact, as I’ve pointed out to Muslims and others, the Bible repeatedly says that the Jews were not good, not a single one, and were corrupt, and had become worse than their enemies because they knew right from wrong much better than their enemies being that God wrote it out clearly for them, but worshiped empty imaginary gods anyways. Does that sound like racism? Obviously not. Racists do not insult themselves as much as their enemies because they usually believe themselves to be superior. Yet the Bible is filled more with condemnations of Jews then any other racial group.
Further, if God, the supreme perfect being wanted to kill less than 0000000000001% of the world’s population, or just one 8 year old for committing the least wrong thing to do, who is above God to say, “Thou shalt not kill anything for any reason unless I approve.” Who in the world has authority over God, or comes close to the definition of God? Who is close to perfect? Even if God were not perfect, who is that they can command or restrict God? No one. So to judge (as in condemn) God, is silly, futile, arrogance; it is childish talk to say, “I know better than the one who created me, knows everything, controls all things and sustains me.”
Atheists also ignore what God does not say he did when saying he kills left and right: no where does God say he kills millions of people a day and instantly punishes anyone for doing wrong. The Bible does not, on every page, say, “God kills millions a day, God can’t be appeased.” And notice atheists never point out that God also creates more people a day then die? Notice they NEVER point out anything positive, not even the most commonly known thing about the Bible, that being that is says not to lie? Why don’t atheists point out the positive? Hence why the Bible calls such people, “fault finders” because that’s all they are looking for. It’s fault finders who are the ones who are always angry, who are always “negative” and unfun. They live to make accusations while ignoring their own faults. It’s as if they were accusing everyone else in order to keep judgment off themselves, like a criminal in court who doesn’t want to accept responsibility for his crimes, or a bitter kid who doesn’t want to admit to his parent that he had done something wrong (which he did do).
How is it deliberate atheists can ignore Exodus 23:9, Luke 6:27-41 and Mark 10:17-21? And out of everything in the Bible, they single out the “Don’t judge” verse and take it out of context and arbitrarily accept that it’s supposed to end in a period. and use it as a personal shield and weapon against the very people who obey God. Now THOSE are the true hypocrites. Even if they saw that “Don’t judge” didn’t end in a period, such hypocrites in their carelessness wold still be fault-finders and take it out of context anyways, and spin it as something that agrees with them. They vomit on every verse but that one, conveniently using it as a SHIELD to protect themselves from judgment, while insulting Christians for using God as a shield, as if “Don’t judge” wasn’t apart of God’s word, as if God only afforded protection for those that hated what he said. Do you see the twisted evil and hypocrisy? And ironically that verse is taken out of context on a passage concerning the HYPOCRISY of non-Christian judges judging forgiven Christians!
…to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also. If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you would have them do to you.
If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that. And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, expecting to be repaid in full. But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.
Don’t judge, and you will not be judged. Don’t condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.”
He also told them this parable: “Can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into a pit? The student is not above the teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like their teacher.
Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? – Luke 6:27-41
As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
“Why do you call me good,” Jesus answered, “No one is good—except God alone. You know the commandments: ‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, you shall not defraud, honor your father and mother.’”
“Teacher,” he declared, “all these I have kept since I was a boy.”
Jesus looked at him and loved him. “One thing you lack,” he said. “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come follow me.” – Mark 10:17-21
“Don’t oppress a foreigner; you yourselves know how it feels to be foreigners, because you were foreigners in Egypt.” – Exodus 23:9
Other sites that refute atheists, anti-Christians and pagans:
Whenever an anti-Christian parrot pastes links to you without explanation, reply with those, without explanation.
The girl who was hit and ignored is named Yue Yue (as of 12-23-2011 it seemed over 3,500,000 have seen the video)
“the love of many will grow cold.” -Matthew 24:12
Incredible to see such evil behavior (and from guess who: atheists no doubt), but, I was even more shocked by the one who first picked up the child because she did it in a crude way, but later I found out she was elderly and probably didn’t have the best education being that she was a “trash scavenger.”
“October 13th, afternoon around 5:30, a car accident occurred at the Guangfo Hardware Market in Huangqi of Foshan. A van hit a 2-year-old little girl and then fled. No passersby reached out to help and then another car ran over her. Over the span of 7 minutes, a total of 17 people passing by failed to extend a hand or call the police, up until the 19th person, a garbage scavenger ayi [older woman], who lifted her up after discovering her but the little girl in her arms was like a noodle, immediately collapsing back onto the ground. The trash scavenger ayi called for help, and the little girl’s mother, who was in the vicinity, immediately rushed over and rushed her to the hospital.”
One Chinese commenter on this video said:
It isn’t ignoring, it’s not daring. If one were to encounter a Nanjing judge, one would be screwed.
[Note: "Nanjing judge" refers to the infamous 2006 case of a man named Peng Yu who helped a woman to the hospital after she had fallen only to have the old woman accuse him of knocking her down. The Nanjing judge in that case ultimately ruled that common sense dictated that only the person who hit her would take her to the hospital, setting a precedent that continues only further discourages and reinforces many Chinese people's wariness to help others in similar situations.]
Another person commented,
I wouldn’t necessarily send her into the hospital, but I would definitely make a call, and call for help. For those people who saw and then made a detour around her, have your consciences all been “eaten by a dog” [lost]? May your own children be the next Yue Yue [name of the 2-year-old girl who was run over in the video].
And another said,
Those people who walked by are animals. No, even some animals have compassion and would at the very least stop to take a look. Those 18 pigs who walked by should also be arrested and taught a lesson with 15 days [in jail]. Instead it was the waste scavenger ayi from other parts [of the country] who had a conscience.
” When receiving the money she said Chen Xianmei accepting the Nanhai District Civilization Office’s appreciation, thoroughly reluctantly accepting the reward money. As a simple person, she kept repeating, “I didn’t help her for money.” ” This reminds me of this saying from the Messiah “For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.” (Matthew 23:12)
Here’s a different story from China with opposite news: Chinese Crowd Lifts SUV to Rescue Run Over Child in Wenzhou. I wonder if these were atheists too.
“Often, a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself, whether I may have not devoted myself to a fantasy ” Charles Darwin…Life and Letters 1887 – sandra, Liverpool England, More False Witness Bearing by creationists. Another one breaks the 9th commandment. Dear Sandra, I would ask you and other creationists to stop misrepresenting Darwin and other scientists by mining their quotes. This above comes from a letter to Darwin’s friend, Charles Lyell. The next line is: “Now I look at it as morally impossible that investigators of truth, like you (Lyell) and Hooker, can be wholly wrong, and therefore I rest in peace.” Darwin, unlike creationists, was intellectually honest and always presented a problem before offering the solution. Creationists usually cut and paste only the problem and try to sully Darwin and science with it. It’s a murky, ugly, untruthful business is quote mining, but desperate creationists are happy to do it in the name of their myth.
- Duster, Canterbury, Kent, 07/6/2010 20:31
And it’s a myth because Duster, part of the group that killed 150,000,000 people in the past 100 years in the name of “I’m God, there is no God” not including millions of aborted babies, which in China atheists forcefully abort and try to stop from being born by sterilizing women after having just one (wow talk about “extremists” and “fanatics” and “kooks”) — because Duster who cares about Darwin being taken out of context, but not the deeds of Christians, creationists, theists or God, said so. Get saved Duster, before it’s too late for you.
James, London said that atheism was: “The belief that there was nothing and nothing happened to nothing and then nothing magically exploded for no reason, creating everything and then a bunch of everything magically rearranged itself for no reason what so ever into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs.” As a faithful Christian, James, i’m sure you live and fear the 10 Commandments and believe that if you break one, you’re off to hell. Well, you’ve broken the 9th: thou shalt not bear false witness. I would fear if I were you. Your false witness here is against non-belief in your god and all gods, and also against science. Atheists only believe in one less god than you, James, and please show me any astronomer who says “nothing magically exploded for no reason”. And for stuff “rearranged itself for no reason”? Again, false witness: there was a reason: reproduction. You’ve broken the 9th Commandment, James. Really…
- Duster, Canterbury, Kent, 07/6/2010 20:20
Art, Austin, TX, said,: “Please don’t force me to correct you again. We discussed this before, remember? The Earth-Sun system is CLOSED..” The earth is not a closed system: sunlight (with low entropy) shines on it and heat (with higher entropy) radiates off. This flow of energy, and the change in entropy that accompanies it, can and will power local decreases in entropy on earth. Even if entropy did occur, evolution does not violate basic physical laws because evolution says nothing about the origin of life. Evolution occured only after life originated – however that happened, either supernaturally (unlikely) or naturally (most probably). Even major creationist orgganisations like Answers in Genesis says the 2nd law of thermodynaimcs should not be used as an argument against evolution.
- Duster, Canterbury, Kent, 07/6/2010 20:09
And even the former atheist Antony Flew had to admit there was at least a God of some kind after carefully examining DNA, but despite all of Duster’s careful examining, he refuses to see anything but arguments that can be used against creationists, despite none of them proving evolution possible, logical, or creationism illogical. Talk about intellectual dishonest and pathological science. Deeply sinful.
“The atheists lunatic belief system: In the beginning there was NOTHING – and absolutely nothing was happening to absolutely nothing. Then, one random day – absolutely nothing exploded and absolutely nothing became… absolutely EVERYTHING. Then the nothing that became everything (for no reason at all) rearranged itself into self-replicating, intricately complex life forms. ” – Michael, Scotland, 5/6/2010 11:21 Or your version…. One day there was an omnipotent being who decided to create the most enormous universe full of stars and planets… he chose one little one, put some stuff on it and then did nothing but watch as they killed themselves for millenia… so he sent his ‘son’ to die for us. A bunch of (uneducated) guys in huts 2000 years ago wrote a book about it which has spawned countless wars and even though we’ve made huge scientific steps since then, people still believe what’s written in that old book…. that make more sense? As it doesn’t to me!
- Oli, Braintree, Englishland, 07/6/2010 13:43
“Or your version….”
“One day there was an omnipotent being”
Another person (atheist? agnostic?) who doesn’t know Bible basics: it Bible doesn’t say God suddenly one day appeared, nor that the day appeared at the same time as God. Truly stupid. Truly ignorant.
“who decided to create the most enormous universe full of stars and planets…”
You committed logical fallacy “begging the question”: what does enormity and being full of stars and planets (actually mainstream scientists claim that most of the universe is empty. Millions of people have already been told that. it seems to me you’re not very informed as me and don’t keep up with the latest science. Further “the most enormous universe” in comparison to what other universe? The little imaginary one that exploded one in your skull? Did you read some book about parallel universes or dote on mainstream science fictional tales in the few news articles you read about how “there’s a giant gap in the universe, billions of light years of an expanse with nothing there and scientists think it might be the entrance to another universe” and then all the sudden it’s as real as a billions and billions of years old Carl Sagan big bang that you saw exploding?
“he chose one little one,”
Where does the Bible say he chose one place to put life on, when throughout the Bible it talks about angels? You also made a strawman argument: do all Christians say God only made life in one area of the universe? Further, even if it were true, you committed the fallacy of begging the question again: what is your point? You’re point, because you are a morally blind and morally backwards person, is that it’s arrogant to think God would do so, as if you are God of all, or greater than him or his judge to say, “How arrogant of you to choose one place to make life.” Huh? Because? Confused much? And as if you know the future? And read all the atheists here railing against me for pointing out THE NEARLY MILITANT ATHEIST CARL SAGAN’S ABSURD IMPLICATION THAT THE ONLY LIFE THAT EXISTS IS ON EARTH! BUT, “DAMN THEM CHRISTIANS NO MATTER WHAT THEY SAY! GOD MADE ME MAD AND DIDN’T GIVE ME MY WAY! HE LETS BAD THINGS HAPPEN! UH UH UH HE DOESN’T LET ME EXPERIENCE WHATEVER I WANT TO! LIKE BAD THINGS! UH UH UH…” Endless contradictions and arbitrary circular reasoning. When will, it end? When will atheists who protest against Christianity no matter what good they see coming from Christians concede they are wrong about God not existing? Pride comes before a fall.
“put some stuff on it”
Listen to that idiot atheist rant. So you have Carl Sagan, an idol among most atheists, seems to me at least, and many atheists trouncing all over Christians with words like, “There’s just this one pale blue dot we know about, precious life all over, glory and beauty all over, look at all the beautiful billions and BIILLLIOOONS of stars my children! Weeee look at me run through the beautiful evolved grass and the beautiful invisible wind that no one can see rushing through my hair but trust me the wind exists even though you can’t directly see it weeee look at me run! Look how I evolved to be able to out run the monstrous dinosaurs and other humans to survive and because my DNA wanted to replicate! Weeee, oh look at the glorious flowers and beautiful everything you crazy evil wicked sinful theists who causes wars and misery and death everywhere due to YOUR gods YOUR God YOUR beliefs (and says very quickly) NOT MINE! and weeee loooook at meeeeeeeeeeeee… you only have one life to live you twists see how awesome the universe is don’t waste your life!” But, you, an idiot, a typical atheist, coming up with an arbitrary argument in smugness and hate and bitterness, have to say the opposite of what you know to be false, just to, “get the Christian to chase his tail” and out of spite for God. The very same group that faults Christians for being stupid for wasting their precious life by not experiencing the “wonderful and beautiful” universe by not “living life to the fullest” (meaning agreeing with whatever an atheist says is fun and good, not the Christians’ version), just say, “stuff” now, because oh: it’s just a stupid Christian ur talkin’ too. Talk about hypocrites. Conniving, evil, wicked, lying, deceptive, time-wasting, hypocrites. How much more of atheist “bullshit” do theists have to listen to before locking them up for temporary insanity, hopefully temporary. Lock those war-starting atheists away. Yes: you are the ones who start wars: 150 million dead in hundred years thanks to atheist communists. And being that atheists lie so much you can’t even trust that they aren’t just using communism as propaganda to get their way, to, how do you say it, “using religion as a tool to control people.”
“and then did nothing but watch as they killed themselves for millenia…”
Wow, really, did not even read page one of the Bible. Here we go again with atheists coming up with arbitrary arguments, committing the fallacy of “circular reasoning”, another damn God if he does damn God if doesn’t argument. Fault: 1) I thought atheists DON’T want God getting involved in every single little thing they do because, “Look how he’s CONSTANTLY ANGRY AT EVERYONE, KILLING LEFT AND RIGHT AND COMMITTING GENOCIDE”, but now, switcharoo: God “don’t do nothin, he just made stuff and watches without feelin’”. What a provoker.
“so he sent his ‘son’ to die for us.”
But wait: you just said he sat and watched, as if he felt nothin’, but all the sudden he sent his (ONLY, PERFECT, AT-ONE-WITH-HIM) son to DIE (WHAT HAPPENED TO THE ETERNITY COMPRESSED INTO THREE DAYS SUFFERING FOR COUNTLESS SINNERS WITH COUNTLESS SINS!?!? WHAT AN ARROGANT DECEPTIVE TRIVIALIZER! YOU SOUND LIKE SATAN MAN!) for us, to DIE for US, THE ENTIRE PLANET(?), but now all the sudden, according to you, God decides, “I’ll send my son to die for them.” Wow you are no story teller, no Bible-story writer. You can’t tell a story that make sense like God can, or those “primitives living in huts” could/. And what happened to the “caves” myth/cliche?. First humans only lived in caves now they only lived in huts.
And despite God dying for “us” you still hate him, even if he died for over 50 billion people, with countless sins. And really?: you care about “millions” of people (theists) dying let alone one, Mr.: “I See No Communist Atheists Muderin’ No One,” Mr. “I Was Around For the Past 6,500 Years to Be Tormented at All the Millions of Deaths I Saw Just as I Was Around To See Evolution First Happen 12 Billion Years Ago and Before that When I Saw the Big Bang Happen!” — huh? just millions? No: over a billion people have died over thousands of years, and over billions more if we really were around for millions and billions of years. You speak CARE-LESS-LY, without care, without care for the truth, just like all atheists. You’re sloppy-minded, like a drunk person, drunk on your delusions of grandeur, thinking you’re superior to God, as if God was just a cloud floating in the sky even though that doesn’t come anything close to the definition of “God.”
“A bunch of (uneducated) guys in huts 2000 years ago”
Wow I’m reading the words of a major moron: You still haven’t seen these things called “pyramids”? Where u been man? Living in a cave, Mr. Uneducated? You haven’t even seen a National Geographic propaganda movie of any kind, no commercials, no magazine covers of the “primitives” you’re talking about? Speed up your education guy who lives in a house superior to a hut (cuz don’t you know what you live in is a definite sign of your intelligence, uh, no): http://ooparts.tk, http://forbiddenarch.tk. Or, you could just look up “pyramids” in Wikipedia, dominated by your fellow nerdier-and-living-in-a-darker-danker-basement-than-you atheists friends.
wrote a book about it which has spawned countless wars
Why are you so gullible? Why do you keep repeating a myth? Biased much? Ignorant of history much? You can’t even check the atheist controlled Wikipedia? What “countless” wars moron? Count some for us: which wars? Are you going to refer to the CATHOLICS? Are all Catholics “Christian”? Are all Christians Catholic? And listen to what an idiot this person is: he’s said “all wars are bad.” So no war is fought for a just reason? No fight is fought for a good reason? You might as well have said, “all defending is bad,” “all attacking is bad”, and you do both with your words. Yet another example of how illogical anti-Christians are, yet another overgeneralizing, sterotyping, assuming, hypocritical, simplelton.
and even though we’ve made huge scientific steps since then,
Like what idiot? This is another moron who thinks atheists paved the way for scientific advancements and that atheists came up with all the great scientific advancements and that evolutionism was the cherry on top (despite it only being shown as having been useful for COUNTLESS MURDERS: STALIN, HITLER, POL POT, KIM IL JUNG, AMERICAN EUGENICISTS, and other serial killers. See how hypocritical atheist-defenders are? Their accusations apply to them, not the Christians they lump in together with the fakes in their arrogance and carelessness. It’s the atheist Bible that spawns countless fights and deaths and endless strife. The “spawning of evil” comes from those who worship false gods, and multiply them, those who worship themselves and other humans, comic book characters and animals, and out of HATRED for God’s word is evil spawned, from atheists included, not THE BIBLE, you spawn of Satan. “Your father is the devil, and he was a liar and murderer from the beginning.” Satan, the accuser, the hypocrite accuser and judge, who condemns God throughout the day, just like his children do, yet do the very things they accuse the righteous of.
people still believe what’s written in that old book….
Look how stupid this guy is; he’s so dumb he commits one of the most obvious logical fallacies: “Age Fallacy”. “It’s old therefore it must no longer be useful.” Cool so all I have to do is wait for you to turn some “old” age for you to be wrong about whatever you’ve said, all I have to do is say, “Darwin is dead and old and so is evolution babble.” So many contradictions in atheist ranting. Oh and, since “don’t murder” and “don’t lie” is “old” (ancient even), it must not matter if I lie to or murder you, right Mr. “I’m New”? Or is that what you just believe for yourself and fellow Christian-haters? You sure are “new.”
people still believe what’s written in that old book…. that make more sense?
No Mr. New Drama Dots, that doesn’t make sense. You’re grammar is nonsensical, which is typical of an atheist.
As it doesn’t to me!
Not only does that sentence not make sense to me, it doesn’t make sense at all. What an idiot. But this idiot, got 60 votes up, no doubt mainly from atheists. There were sixty votes up for this rant, this stupid, childish, oaf’s rant. If that isn’t an awesome sign of how stupid anti-Christians and atheists are, if that isn’t evidence of proof, then what is? Do they need to be seen punching themselves in the mouth or running into brick walls over and over saying, “I can defeat you!” til they drop dead?
I belive in the planet god Staurnius. He says that all life is of him and within him. Without him there is nothing. He declares his existance through our belief in him, shun science, burn your books of evil and worship at his orbit. His physical manifestation can be seen with a telescope, the planet you call saturn.
- Saturnius Priest, omnipitent, 07/6/2010 13:17
A moron atheist gets ten votes up because he compared the most influential helpful religion and book in the world, tested against 4000 years of time, and lasted, and bested all other books after all that time, is still used as an archeological guide even by atheists, and used for studying ancient languages, to his little rant about about worshiping a planet. And even though they knew that the Bible says not to worship material things, as do true Christians (not talking about “Pentecostal” Arminian idiots), to use reason, to have evidence for what you believe and not to assume and not to lie, they compare it to a priest worshiping a planet and to the “superior” “logical” atheists whose lives are based on science and worship science (so they claim) yet when it’s pointed out that they use emotional ranting in place of science, they ask you, “what u talkin’ bout science for?” Uhhhhh: because you idiots keep including it in your attacks and basing your claims on your so called science? Just like this Saturn rant? “Duh”? Yet you make fun of “retards” and claim Christians and theists are “retards”? BLIND, DUMB, IGNORANT, ARROGANT, HYPOCRITES. No atheists, it’s not the lovers of Christ or the God who created all the planets and matter in the universe that are apart of an obscure and bizarre anti-reasoning cult, that’s you Mainstreamers who believe you saw a big bang billions and billions of Carl Sagan years ago, saw gas turning into planets and stars, saw energy turning into rocks, saw magic soup puddles giving birth to little animals when hit with Dr. Frankenstein’s lightning, saw evolution over billions and billions of years of these little animals turning into laughing, dancing, singing, sexual humans, turning into male and females subduing their environment and choosing to worship an invisible creator, who think you see transitional fossils, a bag full as proof that these things happened, who think you still see stars forming from gas and planets from rocks floating around billions and billions of light years away, who think that moths being born with spots is proof that laughing, dancing, singing, sex-having, exploring, God-worshiping humans, came from little living thingies that you can’t see and can’t even describe, and can’t show to anyone. Talk about believers in the “invisible”. Talk about “deluded”. Talk about “kooks” and “cranks” and “crackpots”. Talk about mere faith and needing faith and talking about faith all the time because of zero evidence for what you believe in. Your cult even is a perfect description of how you think: “Mainstream” as in “Because we’re the authority, majority, most popular and most accepted, we’re the right and good ones!” Wow! What happened to those logical fallacy lists that you hijacked and spread all over the Internet in the name of “no gods no guilt”? You’re similar to the false pastors Jesus described, you jump over the sheep gate rather than come in through the Gate with permission, pretending to be a shepherd, rob the sheep, then jump over the gate like a thief in the night after doing damage. You repeat logical fallacies while committing them, because you could care less about them in the first place, and just want to appear wise without having to do the work to truly be wise. You are blind guides leading the blind trying to lead the sighted as well, but you fall into a pit while trying.
This Saturnian priest is a typical atheist; he doesn’t know what science is. He couldn’t use a spellchecker, but got ten votes up. Or is that his dumb way of saying, “Theists can’t spell”? And what a statement that deserves voting up right? “Theists can’t spell, dey don’t do science, dey not builded no pyramids, no dey builded nuttin, dey uh, um, dey war all dah time so dat why der is none left and why atheists rule da world and why atheists are the most biggerest group in da world and why der is only 4 persent of theists in world now.” Talk about “bigotry”, “hateful” and “war spawning”. And he thinks he’s being scientific by mere mockery. Truly an idiot. It’s typical for atheists to vote up any “old” cliches, any nonsense, as long as it’s directed against theists. Truly stupid. No moron atheists: the idiots are you, because all you do is pretend to be scientific by saying, “Nanny nanny ur not scientific, we’re the scientists.” or good even though you watched without protest, or a little feeble protesting when it came to standing up for your enemies when they were unjustly attacked. You’re no better then the same who watched while the Jews were taken away to be humiliated and brutally murdered under the pretense of being thieves and anti-progress, and no better than those who committed those crimes. No moron atheists, it’s you who “builded” nothing, there are no pyramids standing in your legacy. You are a tiny minority, because you’re bitterly unpleasant, self-destructive, negative (despite that some of you pretend or delude yourself into thinking that atheism is about living life to the fullest and that fullest means, “being morally good while having fun”), hypocrites, plainly not trustworthy, murderous, arrogant, morally shallow, self-centered brutes.
But here’s something that isn’t taken out of context, said by Darwin: he said that evil existed. Now what, is evil? Can the evolution or survival of the fittest god tell us what evil is? Why did Darwin say evil existed if there’s no God whose personality decides what is evil or not? Is evil killing an animal to eat it? Is it killing at all? Is it lying, stealing, murdering, dishonoring your parents, worshiping false gods, blaspheming God, breaking the Sabbath? What is it? Is it animals killing other animals to survive or for fun? Show me the law book of evil, Duster, which one should I obey? Are you God, Duster, to tell me which laws are evil or not? Or is everything just opinions? And there is the ever present problem for atheists: they know there are absolute things which are good and things which are absolutely wrong, but because of their disgust for God, they can’t explain why and leave you with drama dots for their answer, or the truth, “I don’t care.”
“A fool gets no pleasure from understanding anything, but only in airing his opinions.” – from Proverbs of King Solomon
Found an interesting article just now, less than three months old, in a place I didn’t expect:
How Easter and Christianity undermine atheism
By Anthony DeStefano
4/26/2011 3:09 PM
This Easter it seems that atheists have a lot to rejoice about. According to the latest data in the American Religious Identification Survey, the number of self-proclaimed atheists in America has nearly doubled since 2001 — from 900,000 to 1.6 million.
In a nation that once prided itself on its Judeo-Christian heritage, one out of every five Americans now claims no religious identity whatsoever; and the number of self-proclaimed Christians has declined by a whopping 15%.
Yes, those who believe in nothing seem to be winning more and more converts every year.
The superstition of atheism
Of course, it’s not quite fair to say that atheists believe in nothing. They do believe in something — the philosophical theory known as Materialism, which states that the only thing that exists is matter; that all substances and all phenomena in the universe are purely physical.
The problem is that this really isn’t a theory at all. It’s a superstition; a myth that basically says that everything in life — our thoughts, our emotions, our hopes, our ambitions, our passions, our memories, our philosophies, our politics, our beliefs in God and salvation and damnation — that all of this is merely the result of biochemical reactions and the movement of molecules in our brain.
What nonsense. – More here
I remembered a few minutes before posting this article, that I had discovered an evidence that God is not a being that needed to be created. It was an evidence I had discovered about a week ago. Maybe I’ll talk about it later.
In response to a the Cambridge Professor “Simon Baron-Cohen”, who wants everyone to be more specific then simply calling people “evil” and not looking into why a people are evil (as if no one ever tries to find out why people do evil things even though both former theists and religious people obviously do so all the time and though the Bible makes it clear why people are evil), an atheist named “Hector”, supposedly from Scotland, said,
I can buy this more than I can buy evil being a result of direct intervention by the Devil or any other made up mystical being. Why shouldn’t it be the case that “evil” people coming from terrible backgrounds, starved of love, nurturing and have suffered maltreatment, isolation and rejection. Why shouldn’t it be the case that society can looked into ways of fixing things.
- Hector, Edinburgh, Scotland, 08/5/2011 19:10
Here’s my reply to comment:
“I can buy this more than I can buy evil being a result of direct intervention by the Devil or any other made up mystical being.”
The Devil isn’t “mystical”. And why would you be willing to “buy into” a made up being at all? I sure wouldn’t be willing to believe in lies. But an atheist would, as you admitted in your careless rant.
“Why shouldn’t it be the case that “evil” people coming from terrible backgrounds, starved of love, nurturing and have suffered maltreatment, isolation and rejection.”
Sadly, that jumble of words didn’t make any grammatical sense, so bad is the grammar, no point can be discerned by me, which is sad, since I usually can see the missing point in pointless and badly worded arguments.
“Why shouldn’t it be the case that society can looked into ways of fixing things.”
So, in your dark troll cave, no one has ever been “fixed” by becoming a Christian? No one has ever gotten better? No one has ever looked into “fixing” anyone? No Christian has? No Christian has ever helped anyone else to become a Christian and become more mentally stable and more logical? Get out of your dark troll hole and stop assuming things and babbling nonsense.
For evidence of geocentrism, click here.
What the Crackpot Troll Moderators of PhysicsForums Didn’t Want You To See, Because None of their Darwinist and Big Bang Believer Members Nor Their Darwinist Big Bang Cult Moderators Could Refute In Any Scientific, Logical or Mature Way, In Fact: HAD NO RESPONSE TO, Not Even After Day Had Passed.
A very long silence speaks loudly.
The philosophical and religion ignorant moderators of PhysicsForums didn’t want anyone to see this reply to a comment one of their members made in a post in PhysicsForums on Void Theory (three times it was posted, and three times they removed it using insults as there reasons, no science at all, and attempting to be feelings and thoughts police). And what got one of them to remove it? When a called a newbie to knowledge moron member named Nick an insulting troll who put words in my mouth, a moron with three posts on his belt in PhysicsForums, named Nick, for saying I was pretending to believe that Earth was no older than 6,500 years old, and that “it wasn’t impossible” that the Bible used figurative language, and assuming (or rather ignoring that I wasn’t) a newbie to science, literature or religion, pointed me to the figure of speech page on Wikipedia. So, his assumption that some verse/s(?) somewhere in the Bible (couldn’t be bothered to read it himself of course), because it was possible figurative language, made me wrong, and for that my first reply below was REMOVED (but I wasn’t banned) and then what? Remove three more times despite there being no replies to them, and Nick’s reply was also removed. And for reposting my first reply, I was repeatedly banned (why, if it didn’t get me banned the first time when everyone saw it and it stayed for 24 hours?). And here is the first reply that stumped, embarrassed and humiliated the weak minded moderators and anti-creationist members of PhysicsForums:
The problem with the big void of smaller density leading to apparent dark energy term is that we have to be very close to the center of the void, otherwise everything will look anisotropic. Being close to the center is HIGHLY improbable, much more improbable than being in a void at all.
Why is shoutingly HIGHLY improbable? Because you said so? NO! BECAUSE YOU ARE DELUDED, REPEATEDLY IGNORING THE DESIGN OF GOD ALL AROUND YOU AND PRETENDING IT’S RANDOM. Nothing is impossible for God, except lying. What a contradiction too: Do you think the Big Bang was HIGHLY probable? How about it being HIGHLY probable let alone at all, despite evidence repeatedly being found against it, and pointing towards a 6,500 year old universe? And where are you instincts?: You think it’s probable regardless of the repeated contrived explanations to get rid of giant problems like the billions of light years wide void in space?
What about this contradiction: It’s highly unlikely we live in the center of a void, of the universe, but it is for light of countless many kinds, countless many types, randomly, by unknown means, with many distinct emotions, a heart, desires, mind, will, self-awareness, conscience, soul, extremely complex DNA, beauty of countless kids and types wherever you look, sometimes astonishingly beautiful, life that dances, sings, sleeps (something which has been a mystery for thousands of years or millions if you believe the Big Delusion) imitates for fun, has humor (a very hard to explain thing), plays games (came up with chess, for which no perfect solution has yet been found), tries to solve everything (to various degrees), even how to create other life with understanding of how exactly to do so from start to finish, can naturally/supernaturally reproduce in three different ways: cloning, sex, and self fertilization, can withstand all kinds and types of damage, and REPAIR themselves without knowing how, and still live and flourish, on a planet on which food and drink of all kinds exist, and useful poison, with material that can form countless useful things, and though being recombined in endless ways still be beautiful, forms of life which rely on each other, help each other, and even love each other, and able to communicate in thousands of different languages or more.
Also explain to me how it is probable that various flies evolved to look almost exactly like bees, despite the upheavals all over the world that were so great they magically got rid of the trillions of transitional fossils that should exist. Please explain the fly I saw, which hovered and turned like a machine, which when I first saw thought was a Cecada Killer, but as I concentrated on, saw was a giant fly (a small strip of forest in Reston, VA). So a fly, evolved, over billions of years, to look like a somewhat related animal, with superior flying ability? That’s probable?! And not just one fly, but there is mimicry of all kinds! Even bacteria and viruses have mimicking abilities DESIGNED to fool the things they live on. And is it probable that seeds from plants would germinate after thousands of years, or millions? I haven’t looked, but I wouldn’t be surprised if someone has or will discover a seed in millions of years old strata that germinates.
And though life is often very hostile and even self-destructive, it’s flourished, with all the kinds life forms that existed in the past, still existing. And life has flourished so much, that many humans even fear “overpopulation” and come up with evil schemes to murder most people rather than schemes to populate other planets (because they are silly and evil morons with little conscience and morals). And we’ve even succeeded in going to other planets. And, there are obviously spirits, many of which clearly hate us, and though clearly having the ability destroy us, are obviously being prevented from doing so, by what are clearly good spirits, which sometimes show their presence in some way when they save a life or lives. It’s also clear, unless you’re stupid or ignorant or a stubborn God-hater, that aliens are visiting us every day, or if not visiting, having bases on Earth or nearby, and sight-seeing, even showing off to some degree I would guess. Why are there very beautiful light-up jellyfish at the bottom of the oceans? Are chameleons and cuttlefish that can also camouflage themselves AND LIGHT UP in various ways probable? What about octopi that can camouflage themselves and hide themselves in a cloud of blackness? Is it probable that life is able to flourish at the very bottom even underneath the oceans of the world? Is it probable that there would be life living in boiling ocean water at the bottom of oceans, or boiling tar, or that could survive extreme heat then extreme cold then extreme radiation, and in space? How probable was it that the Crotoniidae mite would “reevolve” the ability sexually reproduce after millions of years? What are the odds of that happening after an alleged millions of years? Yet ALL OF THAT is probable to you, from randomness? And just how many random universes do you know of that existed before to imply we are probable? And if you believe i random universes exiting before, then why would you say it’s HIGHLY improbable that we live in the center of a void? Confused much? In addition to all that, you think that all is probable, even with living “fossils” repeatedly being found, inferior in design to their giant armored forms WHICH DIDN’T SURVIVE while the smaller weaker forms did, and giant ones like Brontosaurus with inferior armor to other dinosaurs still surviving (and/or living comfortably) in the Congo, and unarmored snakes, even giant ones, surviving despite having no legs or arms or wings and a massive body exposed to easy damage? And not only have many snakes that grow to giant size survived, but can live for many decades. How do animals know how to reproduce, eat, find food, sing, dance, protect themselves, walk, fly, glide, climb, dig, slither, and some, even birds, can make tools. Is that probable? Is it probable that insects and cats have brains faster than the fastest publicly known super computers? Can you explain why dolphins, cuttlefish, octopi and parrots are as intelligent as they are? Can you explain how the Lyre bird evolved its ability to imitate any sound? How did the Bombardier beetle evolve? How do skunks know that its musk glands will repel other animals? And how do flowers know when to bloom, the beauty and scent of many which attract man to spread more of them?
Can you also tell me how probable it was for all life on the planet to have evolved into its many forms over billions of years, with everything else I mentioned? How probable also is it that when Daniel Tammet hit is head that he acquired god-like calculation and communication abilities? How does evolution explain Euler, Ramanujan and Tesla? And no doubt there are other such geniuses, who get no where because their minds have been filled with science-hindering lies and liars who go around making stupid insults to scare them into submission like, “God did it (so no need to learn anything)”. No, “evolution did it, so rape doesn’t matter, nor murdering the unborn, BUT, Christians are EVIL who dare judge that that rape and child murder are evil, and that unnatural sex which leads to population decline, which leads to fewer minds to save the world from murderous atheists and pagans. How dare they believe an old book full of contradictions and missing books! How dare they continue knowledge and preserve it! Why can’t they just forget like us and come up with new things that might be true and faith that they are true? Let’s rape and encourage pornography and abuse and murder children. Or, let’s just drink more beer and play games while trying to save the world by letting it kill itself off, so that there is less carbon dioxide, because, I don’t want to evolve to live under the ocean.” And do you think all of that is probable, including man’s extreme stupidity despite his extremely intelligent mind with it’s massive umber of neurons all interconnected (why is man so stupid and why does he do such great evil despite his intelligence and a common programmed conscience aware of good and evil), which in mentally healthy people will “burn” when they do wrong – you think all that is probable along with the fine-tuning necessary for that to all be possible?:
I would also like to know from you: How likely is it that giant amphibious or fully aquatic dinosaurs have come to live in small bodies of water in the USA, far away from oceans? Jacque Cousteau knows at least one exists in Lake Tahoe. Or how is it that shrimp came to live in the middle of a desert, on a large rock structure, in Australia, extremely far any ocean? How about the fish of Death Valley, and note the word “death” in the name of that valley? How did a giant structure, broken in two, in the shape of Noah’s Ark, get on mount Ararat? “More improbable” for your random universe: why is the impression of the shape of the bottom of a ship doing at the foot of that mountain? How do you explain the many out of place artifacts in the world” (2)? Are they probable too in this billions of years old universe of your invention?
More popular is the other theory that the dark energy is apparent due to the cumulative effects of the light passing through many voids. That avoids the need for us to be in a center of a spherical void.
And why might it be more popular, TO PEOPLE LIKE YOU (NOT EVERYONE), who ignores the obvious all around you and takes it out of context in a world of people who hate God for not doing whatever they want him to do, like you? Can you make a correct guess, based on evidence, and not mere faith, so called “blind faith” by atheists and agnostics?
What a sad world atheists and pagans have made for themselves. What to choose, a life realizing how sad their lie is, and being hated for not pretending it’s truth, or joining the lie at the risk of ending up tortured and murdered by one of the liars? Who to trust, those who when they kill your body can do no more to you, or the one who can destroy both body and soul in Hell, while continuing their suffering forever and can also give eternal peace to those who trust in him? Temporary vs. eternal. What is the logical choice to make to survive, and live?
There clearly is a corrupting being that causes stupidity and evil among us, making us much worse than seems logical, and there clearly is a being that only does good and will not give in to evil, and restrains it.
Why God would isolate Earth from the rest of the universe, why he would make it difficult for the rest of his intelligent creatures to find us, why a loving being would not want to see Hell and death spread over billions of light years in all directions, why he would choose to limit sadness and pain? If he was a merciful, compassionate and loving God, it would be understandable. In conclusion, be thankful for what God has shown you, and turn to him, before it is too late, and you no longer see, smell, hear or touch his wonders.
It does not go against reason and learning to say, “In the beginning, God made the heavens and the earth,” and that God does what is wondrous in our eyes, but it does when you to try and explain everything away with “Say, ‘It was chance and evolution for why things are the way they are,’ because it’s money that matters, not truth, if you want many friends to have a comfortable life.”
God have mercy on you who hate God, because his hatred is much greater and just, and he is able to carry out anything he wills. And one day, his Son will return, both to save and to destroy.
Instead of resorting to mere insults and banning whatever you disagree with, moderators of PhysicsForums, how about be scientific and honest? How about showing the truth, instead of hiding it and accusing everyone else who disagrees with your attitude and feelings and opinions as being crackpots, trolls, making “noise” and having an attitude? If you resort to mere insults and banning along with it, doesn’t that show that you have an attitude that needs to be “canned”? Why are you above your own rules? Is that logical to attack and condemn others for/as being, doing and having those things when you yourselves make mere insults and have an “attitude”? How about you stop with the double standards, lies, and hypocrisy and encouraging immorality by claiming or implying that there is no absolute truth or morality? It is absolutely wrong to abuse and murder babies and children, why can’t you agree with that? Why does that deserve mere insults and banning? You’re not experts in religion, the Bible, God or Christianity, merely because you have some great amount of knowledge in math, biology, or physics, or are a moderator of PhysicsForums, that doesn’t make you God or my Judge does it? Promote true science and peace, not hatred with your evil attitude and cowardly anonymous attacks.
“…their ships were far superior to ours, both in size and technology – Boy, were they big!… and menacing! No, there is no question of a space station… – Neil Armstrong, NASA astronaut, one of the first humans on the moon in the modern age
I heard the ”Pale Blue Dot” poem or speech from Carl the crazy, humanist, atheist, evolutionist, hypocrite Sagan on Alex Jones at about 3:30 AM today, more like night, and was angered and annoyed by what I heard. I broke his rant apart and refuted it.
Sagan: “From this distant vantage point, the Earth might not seem of any particular interest.”
That can be said of a lot of things from a far away distance, so what?
“But for us, it’s different.”
Is that profound, to say that humans are interested in what is around them? That’s something to say to very little kids, not any intelligent kid over eight years of age. Humans are also interested in their own bodies, and those of others, adding that would have given it more complexity at least.
“Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home.”
I look forward to my home in Heaven, and Earth after evil people like Sagan, and Satan are no longer polluting it and tempting others to be hateful like them, and after it’s been melted down and reformed into perfectly beautiful safe place.
“On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives.”
And those God loved continue to live in Heaven. (For you who are ignorant of Scripture, it says, “You are angry with the wicked every day,” and “You hate all who do wrong.”
“The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every “superstar,” every “supreme leader,” every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there – on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.”
WOW: AND I THOUGHT I MADE RUN ON SENTENCES. WOW. Besides nerdy and pretentious I couldn’t follow that and won’t. That turned this speech into a rant.
“The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena.”
That statement shows that Sagan had little to no conscience. It’s a stage for narcissists like you and sociopaths and psychopaths and the arrogant, who think or act like life is a game. Life is not a game or act. When little kids are physically and emotionally abused and cry in pain, scream out in pain and feel like committing suicide, hey are not acting, they are not putting on a show to entertain, nor are others of any age who are severely abused or in the process of being murdered.
“Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors, so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot.”
Yes: and atheist leaders like Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, and the Chinese atheist government and the atheism supporter Hitler and Roman Catholics Mussolini and Franco, who together, in less than 100 years, murdered over 300,000,000 people, and severely persecuted those who loved God. And the Chinese government still severely persecutes Christians who won’t conform to their atheist-approved version of Christianity, and there are still many atheist leaders and police in Russia and it’s former satellite states who persecute Christians, including Belarus, which right now is ruled by someone worse than Hitler (because unlike Hitler, this man has much easier access to information about God, and so knows better not to do what he is doing).
“Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner,”
So, the Anglo-Saxons look like Pygmies? Muscovites look like the Ashkens and Sephars of Israel? Many Israelites have a rough and crude appearance. Their aren’t many fine Israelis.
“how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.”
This rant had no point. It seems to be a more pretentious form of the logical fallacies: “War is bad/War is bad because people die (and it causes pain)” and “Arguing is bad (because it’s unpleasant)” which as far as I know never have what I put in brackets, and so are still pointless. Even saying, “because people die” is pointless, because why is death bad in all cases? On top of that anti-population expansion people want people to die, in huge numbers (which by the way shows that they could care less about technological progression, such as colonizing space, and are therefore boring and anti-scientific, and yet are often evolutionists and supporters of the Mainstream Science religion which is supposed to be about having fun learning and making money and helping others, technological progression, scientific progression and colonizing space, though many in that cult if not all are also against population expansion, which therefore shows that Mainstreamers and non-scientists which are against population expansion but who support Mainstreamers are a self-conflicted, confused (or forgetful) and hypocritical group.
Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.
How does Earth, which you pretentiously call a point of pale light, challenge “the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe” if Earth is not alive? And what makes it a delusion to think God gave us the privilege of seeing his creations, enjoying them, serving him and being one of the focuses of his attention and other things? Further, why did he “Universe”, rather than God or aliens? I sure don’t see any mention of Geocentrism in this rant in any way, so why did he just speak out against it? Was there something Carl the liar didn’t want the world to realize, but to keep a secret for the elitists he served?
“Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark.”
This liar was bribed by elitists to mislead people away from the fact that Earth is often visited by aliens (and he took the bribe), every day now, and that the U.S. government had possession of alien ships and bodies. In my last post I even have pictures of a UFO I saw a few days ago.
“In our obscurity,”
We’re not obscure if aliens are always coming here of many kinds, in ships that can travel to other planets with life that is alien to them, and when thousands of angels and demons know about us and fight against or protect us every day.
“in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.”
God’s word is everywhere, the book he wrote through mankind is the most popular, widespread, numerous, free and priced, most influential book in the world and has been translated into the more languages than any other book. And it clearly says God will save those he loves from those who hate Him and therefore them. Further, one time a saucer did help an army to get through a wall, so that is a hint that they might help SOME humans and save them, again, one day. And they be populating other parts of the universe with humans. There are many missing people that have never been found, and aliens are known to take blood samples and cattle parts, which they might be using for cloning and medicine.
“The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life.”
Liar. And that statement is pointless.
“There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit yes. Settle, not yet.”
We already have alien ships and probably ones based on their technology, and even if we don’t, the richest countries could easily colonize the Moon or Mars if they haven’t already, or make space stations near Europa and Titan and use the resources from them to live, and after doing those things, continuing to colonize the solar system, and from there, the rest of the galaxy, until the whole universe is filled with humans. The things which stop us from doing those things are people with anti-scientific and anti-truth beliefs and belief systems like and worse than Carl Sagan’s and evil behavior and speech in general, which Christians also do at times.If true Christians used their money for space colonization instead of evangelization, charity, and luxury goods, then they would be successful at it, so long as they didn’t totally forsake their main goals, and didn’t commit any atrocities which God would hold them responsible for as a group, and punish them for in such a way that it would stop them from space colonization.
“Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.”
What does it matter where location you “take a stand” against something is? And take a stand for what? Against people like you? Satan? And I thought he was against taking stands against people? Or did he expect those warring against each other to just tolerate child abuse, murder, stealing, lying, fraud, drunkenness, stalking, harassment and insane people always disturbing their peace or encouraging such things with illogical rants? Did he expect people to just get up and stand at a podium and speaker and complain, “Why can’t we all get a long?” as if merely asking with sadness would make everyone more logical and kinder or perfectly?
“It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character building experience.”
Who said this, and what does it matter? It was because Carl Sagan was a narcissist, and one who was an astronomer and so wanted everyone to think that he was a humble person (a good person) with a “character” (and what kind of character?). Typical sign of a narcissist: use some eloquent or big word in a way that is vague, and therefore makes no point, because narcissists are careless with logic and lazy when it comes to thinking and more interested in sounding smart for easy friends, money, please, praise, admiration, and so just put out catch words for those things.
“There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world.”
How is a distant image an example of Earth an example of “the folly of human conceits” Mr. “People Say That Astronomers Are Said to Be Humble and Have a Built Up Character?” Or were you talking about that conceited statement being that it was the last action you mentioned?
“To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we’ve ever known.”
Why does “a distant image of Earth being “the best demonstration of folly of human conceits” underscore to you that “we” (me and the millions of kind charitable Christians you hated, too full of hate and self-centered to bother to get to know?) need to “deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot”? Besides that not making sense: are you God that your desires should be followed over anyone else’s? And what do you mean by “kind” or “more” kind Mr. Morally Vague Astronomer With the Built Up Moral Character? Why should anyone do what you advise, even you had been specific by saying, “Don’t lie, don’t steal, don’t murder, don’t make images of or worship imaginary gods, love your neighbor as yourself, forgive your enemies, be kind to strangers, bless your enemies not just your friends, and by doing these things are doing, “Do to others as you would have them do to you” which is what you should do” ? If there is no God, then shouldn’t we take this advice, given by God:
“If the dead [will] not rise [(be resurrected)] at all? Why [would] people baptized on their behalf? Why are we [putting ourselves] in danger every hour [if they won't be brought back to life]? I protest, brothers, by my pride in you, which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, [for whom] I die every day! What do I gain, if, humanly speaking, I fought with beasts at Ephesus? If the dead [will] not rise, [then]: “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.” – 1 Corinthians 15:29-32
Most people are reckless like Carl Sagan, and for a bribe that he couldn’t take with him to the grave, to enjoy forever, and so was only temporary, would imprison everyone forever on a “lonely obscure pale blue dot filled with conceited people who hate each other and kill each other.” And how would such people preserve their home if that is what they are like, and don’t grow out of? If they are liars and bribe takers like Carl? Will they change because of a nonsensical pretentious poem, even by being a little kinder, whatever that means to anyone? How could they if nothing changes them according to astronomers and Mainstreamers like Carl? Why should anyone listen to him, especially if they know he was a liar and bribe taker and took a bribe to consign all humans except some illogical elitists like him, to an obscure death? And why would it be conceited if we are trapped on this obscure planet then, in which life alone may exist, to then try and be the center of attention, especially if it’s merely a stage with many viewers nearby and no where else, and when our lives are supposedly only going to be short and the only ones we will ever have, according to atheists, which Carl was?
It is obvious to me that Carl Sagan was a narcissist, from his past words, like his arrogant insult on the Jay Leno Show, which was that there is no “old man with a beard in the sky,”and this Pale Blue Dot speech, which is illogical.
Carl the Credit Theif
About an hour ago I discovered, that on February 19, 2011, bandpitdeviant made a post on Reddit in which he implied that on his own, Carl Sagan came up with a logical fallacy list, as did Sagan, in his book, “Demon Haunted World”. I pointed out in repeated replies that it was Christians who came up with those lists, and that even Darwin, whom Carl trusted in, had stolen credit from others by pretending to have come up with the theory of natural selection on his own, when Edward Blyth, a naturalist creationist was the one who mainly came up with it. Now besides pride being why the atheists of Reddit would be deleting my replies, meaning their pride was offended, it’s also obvious that they might be deleting them because that page bandpitdeviant made, shows how gullible atheists are, and prideful: at the time of me posting this, about 200 people voted bandpit’s post up, and because I kept replying to it (it was dying in popularity before I started replying to it again), and most likely, it was atheists doing so, because Reddit is an atheist-oriented website, which promotes atheism, and it can see from the replies, that atheists are the ones supporting the post and claim that Carl came up with the logic fallacy list.
Deliberate atheism is truly a denial of truth.
[Comments are closed to this article because no atheist has been able to come up with anything useful to say other than to show that atheists are careless readers, hypocrites, immoral and very irritating. There are plenty of comments to read here and on other articles though].
Charlie Sheen: Is He a Narcissist Sociopath who repeatedly fails? Or just a repeated failure who uses stupid stereotypes against Christians and wastes time watching sports and making stupid jokes?
Charlie Sheen, is a famous actor who, at 45, and still a virgin to truth, deep truth. He let everyone know on 2/24/2011 on the Alex Jones Internet Show, that the AA cult stole 22 years from his life. It obviously helped warp him into the warty bitter-tasting poison arrow frog that he now is. Recently, after more bad news of Charlie’s dumb life came out, he finally ceased from being introverted, and he showed his monstrous narcissist sociopath colors. He gave an excellent example of what a narcissist is, and a sociopath: astoundingly arrogant, very rude, flippant, very self-centered, very lustful, impulsive-mouthed, contradictory, nonsensical, heartless, obsessive, violent and shallow. He condemned “judged” everyone who judged him, as “coming from opinion and judgment” yet reduced every Christian to “Bible-grippers”, and by doing so ignored anything honorable or good they’ve done in their lives. He kept saying that he was “winning”, with a defensive, conniving, sarcastic, spoiled-brat tone), clearly hurt by the news about him which showed him to be in part, a sociopath. And now everyone can see that he is also, in part, a narcissist, a combination of both actually.
How is it, Charlie, that you don’t want to be judged, yet mock every Christian for supposedly merely listening to a story about talking to a snake? And what is your stupid story? When Alex Jones brought up Rush Limbaugh’s drug addiction to you, you immediately replied by saying that you’ve never met him so can’t judge him: BUT IF YOU HAD MET HIM THEN YOU COULD? THAT IS WHAT YOU IMPLIED! Further, have you met every Christian? NO! According to your babbling self 22 years of your life was sapped by a pseudo-Christian cult whose founder died high on LSD! So how can you pretend to be wise and knowledgeable, let alone on Christianity? So 22 years of trolls = all Christians? And was everyone in AA “gripping the Bible”? And what kind of son disrespects his father who worships Christ (hypocritically or not) by saying such a thing? Didn’t he feed you and house you and clothe you with his money? Didn’t he make very successful movies that helped you to make money with your acting? Yet you reduced him to a “bible gripper”. Okay boob-gripper. Okay money-gripper. Okay fuel-waster, who “rides high in the sky”. Okay sex-gripper. Okay dirt-gripper. Okay money-hoarder, who thinks he is loving and charitable because he gives out of his RICHES, riches which belong to God, to other con-artists. You know about fluoride being poisonous, and make fun of people WHO CAN’T AFFORD NOT TO DRINK IT, yet you give money away to “breast cancer” doctors, who are con-artists, who harm people with quack medicine, chemotherapy? And you collected some points of attack from 9-11 Truthers and put it into a letter to the president, like that was something original, like that made you a good person, while ignoring your own faults. Remember this teaching?: “You hypocrite: Why do you focus on the speck that is in your brothers eye all the while ignoring the log that you have in yours? First get the log out of your own eye, then you can help remove the speck from your brother’s.” Was that “a snake story”? Jesus sure was talking to snakes: self-righteous hypocrite snakes like you, who try and exalt themselves by bullying easy targets. And yet you whine about others bullying you for being an easy target? Could you, a narcissist, be jealous of, Obama, wannabe president Charlie?
You’re a clever pot-shot artist Charles, and an impulsive arrogant hypocrite who acts like a wild animal, rants, rambles, has poor grammar, makes childish stereotypes, takes the most popular, most translated, most freely available, best selling, most influential, inspirational, historically accurate book in the world, with the most verifiable prophecies in the world, out of context to use against itself, and yet think you are a wise scholar? Whose fault was it, that a rich guy, with all the money in the world to learn the truth, stayed in a cult, a cult you could have easily learned about from a search engine? How did you miss the article about it being false that former alcoholics would not relapse from drinking a little wine now and then? That wasn’t news enough for you? You show no compassion for those who were oppressed like you, yet want compassion, want sympathy, want exaltation for having supposedly escaped from it (only to become something worse, and play god of your own stupid cult), and yet call everyone else who complains about anything a loser, troll, whiner, and complainer.
You also, for no logical reason, vilified everyone who is married, calling marriage contracts dirty (huh…?). How about praising those who stay faithful to them for being strong-minded and self-controlled rather than being weak idiots who go wherever their private parts point them or letting any charming moron in through their window at night?
You said bring it on moron, well I’ve brought it on. Show me your ninja, Vatican assassin, stereotyping rebuttal. You have none, because you have no moral wisdom, resist the truth, and so your logic is corrupt. You think that only you have the truth unless someone agrees with you, and if they don’t, “they’re just coming from opinion and are a troll.”
Charlie is so arrogant that he even insulted Alex with a deeply sarcastic tone in repayment for Alex trying to protect him from being investigated as a threat to society for saying that he would murder anyone who attempted to harm him. He said to Alex, “Look what they’ve done to your mind, you have to put everything in context.” So Charlie repaid Alex’s love back with “violent love”, which is what Charlie said he calls his love and is how he loves those who show him love. That would explain the drunken messes Charlie makes when having sex. Imagine what might happen if you hugged Charlie, or shook his hand, or told him you loved him, and he had a bat in his hand. Charlie even said to watch out for him if he had a bat in his hand (yeah that’s a guy I want to hang out with, someone who might kill you in a drunken “love” rage). It seems to me that Charlie’s brain has obviously been damaged by over-drinking, making his pathological disorders much worse.
And Charlie: Look around a little and think of something other than cheap gold-digging women like yourself and hitting little white balls with wood and metal sticks and how beautiful your shallow bratty sarcasm is: we’re not all Catholics, Mr. Ninja Vatican Assassin. And why are you bashing Catholics, when like you, many of them refuse to allow their priests to marry, cuz, “it’s gross for a righteous holy man to have sex”? Shouldn’t you love those child-molestation supporters? Shouldn’t you love Mormons who teach that the more women a man marries the more he secures his godhood? Isn’t that warped and lust-ridden enough teaching for you? Or do you just not think much or look to the sides much? Or do you want to get hit in traffic in a drunken love-rage, running through busy traffic just to violently hug someone for giving you a thumbs up?
Falling Charlie, who lost a beautiful wife for repeatedly losing sight of the truth: May God continue to bless your bitter, spoiled brat, self-centered, stumbling-over-beer-bottles self, so that you will have ever less of an excuse on the day of Judgment for sinning; a day when he will condemn you with facts, not opinions.
Alex also had on one of Charlie’s friends, “Nails”. Nails is a brown-noser despite claiming not to be one, a panderer and kiss-up to Charlie. Nails, despite claiming that “no one wants to hear your complaints and how you were (wronged)” has a website on how to take people to court who wronged you. Moron, if no one wants to listen to complaints and only wants to hear the future than how do you explain people talking about their past to each other all the time and listening with interest? And why did you go to court and tell everyone your complaints and why do you tell everyone how to tell theirs in court? You’re a confused hypocrite trying to be “cool”, but you’ll end up in the Fire with Charlie unless you repent of such hypocrisy. And how naive to imply that no one should talk about the past and only move forward. Much can be learned from history and the past that enables people to move forward. Complaining about the past and telling stories about who wronged you also helps people to avoid the people who wronged you, or learn how to help those people and the person complaining and what to do if they too are wronged. Isn’t that what you are doing with your website about how people can regain their money from bankers who conned them out of it? You are double-minded.
And you Alex Jones, a false Christian, who pandered to Charlie (and Nails) and who approved of his rant against Christians, who defended him for it, because he was “being real”: you’ve shown which side you are really on by doing that. And why did you still side with Charlie after implying Sunday’s should be used to “watch sports”, rather than “win” as Charlie said people should be doing? Charlie also knowingly, and unwisely, trashed a day that is reserved by God so that people will have a good time to get to know one another and help each other, by reducing it to a day of “listening to a snake talk”. And he also went against what you often say is stupid, which is to watch sports (football) rather than fighting against the NWO. He went against you Alex, and yet you hung on to the thread of protest he made, in order to take advantage of his fame. Charlie was even flippant about 9/11 and said to move on. So, so much for that thread. What you gained was infamy from childish blasphemy and probably the ephemeral support of many hateful people like Charlie.
If “being real” is what earns your love, than why don’t you express your love for “the globalists” whom you say confess to what evil things they plan to the world before doing them and who “lie in plain sight” and “hide the truth in plain sight”? But you do show your love for them by ranting about what they do almost every day and when you aren’t, replaying your shows in which you do and letting your websites continue to. You love evil, that is why you rarely mention what is good and refuse to show anyone the true gospel. If being real is what earns your love than why don’t love anyone who is “hateful”, including towards you? Being real, according to the way you use it Alex, is being honest about how you feel. Please tell the world how you know what a person is “really feeling”. Life is just a fame-game to you, and you want to manipulate everyone into being your cartoon and toy soldiers, just like your narcissist rival, Glen Beck, while you sit back and revel over pain they walk into, the insane speech they make, mad behavior they perform, and deaths they die.
According to an atheist, Charlie Sheen,
told “Entertainment Tonight” why he believes the Creator exists, saying, “Anybody that doesn’t believe in God hasn’t looked into the eyes of a child.”
These words cleared any fan-base he may have had with American Atheists, Inc., who were greatly insulted.
Awwww poor evolved crsytal monkey amphibian evolved thingies from lighting-struck puddles of soup from 14 billion years ago from a 34 billion year old magical non-explosion with no center: your soul, mind and hearts were hurt bcuz someone spoke some common sense you reject. Evolve over it already, angry walking fish things.
Charlie Sheen’s anti-Christian rant can be downloaded here: http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6200203/Alex_Jones_Show_-_2011_Feb_24_TH_[sebaygo1]
On Coast to Coast AM tonight, at 10:24 P.M., Seth Shostak, of SETI, was asked by a logic-ignorant caller if whether or not it was a coincidence that during a solar eclipse it was a coincidence that the moon perfectly blocked out the sun (and asked some stupid questions), and Seth, an evolutionist and probably a Big Bang believer, said that he thought it was a coincidence. He didn’t say it was, I just realized, but that he didn’t think it was anything other than a coincidence. But when I listened to the caller bring up this fact, and knowing the other things about the universe and this planet and the solar system that make life possible here and possible all over the universe, knowing about the so called “fine tuning”, I was amazed, and knew it was no coincidence. The next caller was angry at Seth for not acknowledging that we were being visited by extraterrestrials, and brought up witnesses with high reputations for being honest and very intelligent, whom the caller said would be willing to sign affidavits. Seth gave an illogical and deceptive reply by saying that science wasn’t done by affidavits but by experiments. No Seth: science is not that simple; it doesn’t exist in a vaccuum. In science a hypothesis is made, like this: If intelligent life existed outside of Earth, and decided to visit various planets, and there is a great amount of intelligent life outside of Earth (and Seth emphatically implied that he believed there could be billions around the time that he was asked the question about the solar eclipse), and many of these living things were like humans, only able to survive by breathing in gas or liquid of a speficic type, needing protection from various temperatures and chemicals, and if space travel can be accomplished in various ways using ships with widely varying materials and energy sources, than we should see objects entering into our atmosphere from space which appear similar and very different to craft which we build, which show great speed and or manueverablity due to the aliens having enough intelligence to reach earth from great distances and who would logically want to creat a ship that can quickly avoid capture by enemies among themselves or among aliens, and to avoid collisions to be able to witness any amazing discoveries they make back to their own alien kind and bring back anything of value, or to trade with other aliens. Further, if any of these aliens appear to be non-human and not very similar to any life that is known to have existed on Earth since its beginning, than it would be further evidence that they were not from Earth, but outside of it. And to carry out an experiment to verify if such a thing were true, all one would have to have people watch the sky all over, and observe if there are any objects which appear to have superior speed and manuverability and a different shape than craft made by humans, and also to observe the outside of the atmosphere, and also to observe if anyone seese any beings which come out of these objects which appear to be non-human. Conveniently, people are often watching the sky and there are also cameras in human-made ships outside of the planet looking down upon it and away from it. And what are the results? There have been millions of people who have seen such craft that show superior speed and manueverablity to human-made ships (before we may have acquired alien technology and used it or copied it or both), and sometimes there are multiple witnesses to a craft, sometimes over one hundred, sometimes thousands. As for whether or not there have been two witnesses or more who have seen an extraterrestrial entering or leaving such craft, I don’t know, but there have been many people who saw aliens leaving or entering such craft, but with no second witness. There have also been two or more witnesses to an apparent alien or aliens (for example in Brazil (2) where a ship with some inside had crashed, and living occupants went out of it, with at least one was captured) There are also a few people who have regularly seen such a thing happen (which count as repeat experiments, and even if they were not intentional experiments, that would not invalidate what was seen and make the sighting invalid evidence).
How ironic that Seth and other God-deniers are blind to what is right in front of them, that even searching far out past this planet, they still see no sign of intelligence anywhere, not even when they see countless glorious galaxies containing countless glorious stars. Like God says of such people: they are always searching, but never coming to the truth.