Home > atheism > Why Atheism and Atheists Are Destructive To Civilization

Why Atheism and Atheists Are Destructive To Civilization

Besides the obvious examples of mass murderers Stalin and Mao and the atheist-magic-believing anti-Christian, Hitler, who had indirectly murdered way, waaaay more people than even Catholics (unless perhaps if you count abortions, but Russian and Chinese communist-atheists may still be ahead there, especially if counting atheistic Buddhists), here’s super obvious reasons why and why atheists always remain a minority:

1. God-denial or divinity denialism to coin a new phrase is apparently born of bittnerness at life. An extreme bitterness, so extreme that it severely stunts an atheist’s ability to think rationally and without making the mistakes that make them qualify as hypocrites. That bitterness causes them to, out of bitterness (a kind of bottled up rage I suppose it could be called) deny the obvious or delude themselves into not believing it, and it takes up so much of their mental energy and causes their moral boundries (if they ever had any substantial ones) to disolve, so that being self-centered is no problem to them, like dwelling on mainly their needs, opinions, feelings and pain non-stop) that they, end up, just stupid. They end up ranting or having little anything or nothing useful to say regarding anything, scientific or not. In short, their anger and desire for revenge, like some stereotypical incel constantly distracts them and prevents them from doing much of anything useful, and progressing in knowledge and understanding. It works out the same way for anyone who isn’t an atheist and dwells on “how horrible God is for denying me that beautiful female, or sex with kids, or torturing kids and dogs for fun, or not being allowed to rape the weak, or sex with my sister, or slaving someone, or being made king of the world,” or how horrible God is for, “killing my sister when young, or embarassing me for letting me do something stupid in public and mocked over it,” or “for killing my sister who was a good person” and on and on. Atheism = “God is evil for making me feel bad, I don’t deserve to be mistreated by God, therefore I will deny his existence and deny I do anything bad to avoid further feeling bad”. Or can be defined as, “a belief or alleged belief in the non-existence of any being with superior intelligence and morality to themselves out of arrogant delusion and/or a revulsion of being made to feel unhappy about themselves.”

2. That bitterness and arrogant attitude (or narcissism) sets in motion the potential for any crime: child abuse, mass murder, ANYTHING.

3. Atheism necessarily denies any universal objective good or truth. Why? Morals are a set of information, laws, and unless there’s some reason to believe in universal morals (as in morals that are permanent and not subject to change, like the wrongness of lying and hownit should be totally avoided), such morals don’t originate with humans, as humans themselves deny morality has it source in them and can show it with proofs. Though some atheists claim it was humans who invented morallity, they have no proof and by making such a claim are claiming that “to not lie and to only tell the truth” is merely a human invention and not something necessarily true or to be obeyed as 1) there’s no permanent Hell for a liar to face 2) there’s no reason one should never lie and always be truthful as morality is relative to the human who comes up with or has morals. But suppose some atheist says, “No, there is definite evil, like “mindlessly obeying Jesus (whatever that would mean – as if Jesus ever said, “kill everyone who denies communism is best” or “lie, steal and murder” or the atheist says, “it’s wrong to lie, steal and murder because it just is, there’s no explaining why, no need for God or threats of Hell, it’s just bad”. So them, whether that even makes half sense or not, does the atheist then admit that when reasonably possible all lying, theft and murder should be punished? NO, because no atheist holds to a Biblical standard of “it’s simply not ‘good'” or “as defined by God”, and makes exceptions for “acceptable lying, theft and murder/killing”, even Sam Harris said so in one his books, that some people should be killed based alone on what they believe, and saying the type of belief qualifying a killing would be a “dangerous belief”. He obviously doesn’t consider the denial of absolute right from wrong or redefining theft, lying and murder or the belief that somd people deserve (such as himself) whatever they want, as “dangerous”. And dangerous to what or whom anyways, and in a world wherd there’s no Hell or Heaven and life could end in a blink why would any atheist’s beliefs about right from wrong matter than anyone elses? The Bible itself says that if death is the end then live how you want, as you may die the next day, and it’s just before the next day for you, it’s sure true.

4. Some atheists imply they hold life more dear than a Christian believing in permanent Hell as they’ll say, “You only live ones (so have as much fun as you can”), but a Christian would treasure life even more for the obvious reason: “if you don’t obtain God’s love you will suffer (possibly alone or among those you hate), forever”. Note: most false Christians don’t associate God’s love with protection/and salvation from Hell, but the true ones do. Some atheists hope in time travellers to rescue them I’d bet, or reincarnation, so even less so would they care about life.

5. Atheists, the more ignorant and hateful ones lump all religions and religious theists together as all the same and equally harmful and with no regard for their accomplishments or the age of the adherents (as in calling an eight-year old Christian ‘deluded, stupid, destructive and evil’) as if endless eight-year old Christians demonstrated that, when there are clear distinctions. Atheists themselves hate to be classified and “labelled” and “judged” as all being alike, so then why they do so to Christians, Judaics, Mulims or even Buddhists? Literal Christian law rejects all idols and worship of anything less than Supreme and murder, so how is it comparable with idol-ridden sexist Hinduism and idol-ridden Catholicism with it’s plague of gay priests, child aborting hetros and mass murderers (of about 50 million in Europe and Israel)? Islam and so on is not Reformed Southern Baptist, at all, and Reformed Southern Baptist is very disimilar from a Christian religion that refuses to identify as Reformed or Calvinistic but only as “fundamentalist” which at one time may have sufficed but now maybe a cover for a militant religion that seeks the death of anyone who isn’t Christian and holding “free will” to be “sacred and intrinsic and above God’s will) and doesn’t want to see gays, blacks and Muslims all hanging from whatever. But atheists in ignorance don’t know these distinctions, nor care even knowing them, as they are swimming in bitterness and wrong self-assuredness and abhor feeling wrong, so refuse to admit being wrong. If they here some truth that doesn’t fit their truth, they forget it or claim it’s merely a lie or think up some irrational argument against it and not caring about any errors in their argument or going with it anyways in futility as they’re sure, or hope they right anyways about their one central belief that God simply doesn’t exist, or even if so, doesn’t care about what he made.

Now, who would you trust to care for you or your disabled paralyzed kid or kid in chronic pain or with severe autism: someone who describes themselves as, “I don’t believe it’s always wrong to steal, lie or murder as most of the world has believed for thousands of years or those delusional awful hypocrite Christians and their terrible sex-hating boring Jesus who probably didn’t even exist or was just a magician, I believe in doing what makes me feel good so long as I think I’ll get away with it till I’m so old I’ll probably die soon before someone harms me for it”, or, “I believe in ‘as you would have done to you so do to others’ and practice this because by doing so everyone in general who follows that comes closer to what they want without offending others and causing fights, and because I have a loving God who showed me by example it’s the best way to live, and is working within me to adhere to that way of life”?

Again, who would you trust, “I do and think as I please no matter how extreme” or, “I obey the ten commandments well and the golden rule because I love to and God will permanently reward me for good deeds”? It’s super SUPER obvious who is more trustworthy or likely to be. If one has witnesses or documentation to back up being a moral person, why would you choose an atheist, who thinks or to annoy, says spending $500 million to build a telescope is just as useful as giving every poor person in America an equal share of that money, and billions more? What the is a bigger or more powerful scope going to do for America or anyone? But atheists in extreme spite and for the love of grant money and friendship with other useless God-haters love spending money on useless things.

Advertisements
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: