Home > Bible Prophecy, Catholic Church, Catholic Hypocrisy, Catholicism, heresies, Iraq War > Concerning the Heresies of Walied Shoebat, a Trojan Horse for the Revived Roman Empire

Concerning the Heresies of Walied Shoebat, a Trojan Horse for the Revived Roman Empire

Shoebat, a former Muslim has wormed his way into the prophecy culture of Christianity by coming up with what at first I thought were reasonable and sound arguments as to why it wasn’t the Catholic CULT (the whore of Babylon is actually materialistic, greedy Jews and of Jerusalem, who obviously reject Christ) that would form the basis for the Bible-prophesied revived empire that would be for the first time headed directly by Satan in the form of a possessed (at least at times) human, likely a man. Basically Shoebat has become a rival in end-times prophecy interpretation to a solid Christian, David Hunt. David interpreted various parts of Scripture to show clearly that it was the Roman Catholic CULT (not Islam with Calvinists and various other more obscure forms of Christianity as their helpers as Shoebat wants us all to STRAIN to believe) that would morph back into a military world-wide dominator and become violent towards the true Christians. I’m not going to say Shoebat is completely wrong in his interpretation. I can imagine that “the whore” could be Islam in its various forms with Mecca as its spiritual center and the beast she rides being the revived Roman Empire that will be dominated by Catholics who though giving the Islamic whore “a ride” will also punish her at times to keep her in check, or as Revelation puts it “burn her”. Alternatively it could be that the beast the whore rides is the revived Roman Empire and that the whore is a part of the Catholic CULT that decided not to deconvert into militant pre-Catholic times when the Romans blatantly worshiped false gods (as opposed to today in which they worship humans and angels as their new pantheon of false gods and pretend only to be “venerating” them even while idols fill the Catholic cults’ buildings in everywhere, including personal homes, to frustrate the Christians arguing that it is worship).

Shoebat’s interpretation is strained however in that he wants us to believe certain things that are nonsensical, for example that the demons that come out of the Abyss are Muslims and wants us to believe that the beast that comes from the dust and is given life is not literal, not Satan giving life to an evil creation but a governmental system resurrected from the past (a revived caliphate (Muslim) that was based in Turkey. He had me convinced till I read that and read his complicated explanations and calling traditional Christian interpretations of Daniel and Revelation as having come from “lazy” people, and a suspicious statement, a statement that it was his personal belief that it was “good riddance” when Calvinists (most of whom are the true church/Christians) whom he claims joined Muslims against the Catholics (as if they joined in a united war together against Catholics) and casually claimed that “the sea swallowed them up”, as if that was prophecy. Problems:

1. Calvinists are solid Christians, false or not Shoebat mysteriously slanders them and in a malicious way that hints at being dominic in the clever way in which it is worded: he words his “good riddance” statement in such a way so that he could say, “I meant it was good riddance to the Catholics whom they were tormenting”, but Shoebat makes it clear that he is a Catholic with his obsession with Jesus’ mother, Mary, saying classic Catholic defenses as to why she should be given worshipful attention. So though it is worded in such a way so that he can seem to give himself an out, a thinking person would notice it is a sly statement that leads back to his personal hatred of the true church. And more evidence for that is:

2. Shoebat has such a sharp hatred for those who opposed Catholicism that while warning everyone about the Muslim immigrants fleeing into Europe and wherever else from the much more violent ones, and saying that Germany, Sweden and the UK are being dupes and setting themselves up for a take-over by letting them all in, that he as if drunk says that even though the Pope while endorsing the immigration is merely erring, “errs” he says, and instead points out “Protestantism” and Germany as its “embryo” and with some extra focus on Lutherans as being the ones at true fault for this even pointing out Luther’s writings opposing Jewish lies. Did Shoebat forget that the Bible literally says not to listen to “Jewish myths” too? I am half Jew racially, so do not claim I am racist against Jews. I want to make it clear how stupid his reasoning is:

a. If the very head of the Catholic cult is promoting and strongly the immigration of Muslims wherever, HOW can Shoebat brush off that and regardless of many other countries letting them in who are composed of many different cultures that include Catholics and ATHEISTS, HEAVILY with other religions in the minority and hardly any Calvinists regardless, SINGLE OUT GERMANY AND LUTHERANS and nonsensically in passing mention Calvinists in is “good riddance” to them comment? Germany wasn’t ruled by Lutherans in its evolution, but by Calvinists, further Germany in its evolutionary stages was pagan, it then became infused with Christianity till it for a while became Calvinist and during Hitler’s time had also become Judaistic and Lutheran. Calvinists had fallen into such obscurity that they are not mentioned in history during the war, only Lutherans, however, the embryonic stage Shoebat mentions is a clear reference to its time under Calvin being that he mentions Protestantism. Clearly either in ignorance or demonic influence however he doesn’t specifically mention Calvinists, so that, I believe it is a subliminal trick figuratively speaking. In other words he makes some sharp but foggy statements about Lutherans, Calvinists, and a blanket/generalization statement against Protestants (while coming to the defense in the same commentary to sister cults of the Catholics, cults that pay tribute to the Pope like the Orthodox Russians and Marionites). He also defends Catholics and their sister tribute cults by saying THEY DO, at PRESENT TIME have God’s “mark” on their foreheads and shows a picture of an X on the forehead of one supposed member of this cult apparently. So he also corrupts prophecy by changing the order of a prominent event in the Bible concerning a time crucial to understand to be more secure in true faith and it concerns the very name (not mark as he claims) of God on top of that. Imagine the argument that Shoebat and other false Christians will have against the true Christians when they during severe persecution throughout the world suddenly put Christ’s name on their foreheads or “Yahweh” and so on, it will likely be: “Oh now you do this? We the true church, the united Holy Roman Catholic (Superduper Special Wecial Grand Poobah) Church have been putting GOD’S MARK! on our foreheads HA HA HAAAA, and you are latecomers to this came buddies! Oh so you think you’re special for putting Christ’s name on your forehead you wannabe Christians!? Well thank God we’re not Christians but Catholics! We know very well not just to worship Christ but to venerate the other important people God gave us you Mary-deniers! We have Mary, the angels, the saints and Peter himself, but you, you hang your whole lives on Christ, what a gimmick to put his name on your foreheads!”

So they despite the Son, the savior, and have come up with their own scheme for salvation, a failed scheme of making gods out of men and angels. They forget the abhorrence to worship shown to John when he in confusion worshiped an angel while being given the Revelation visions by God, they forget or don’t even know that the first protoCatholic who in Scripture when he indirectly exalted Mary by commenting on her breasts in a statement to Jesus (rather than praising Jesus) was corrected by Christ by saying “RATHER, BLESSED ARE THEY WHO WHEN THEY HEAR GOD’S WORD, OBEY IT”, a direct rebuke to Catholics of every age who DO NOT DO THAT but rather combine their heretical teachings, their “sacred tradition” with God’s word and so negate it, including that statement. Catholics have their own nonsensical fanciful (and I say depressingly dull to the extreme) scheme to get to Heaven and it is in no way going to get any of them to Heaven/eternal peace, but rather as Christ implied, will make them He said, “twice the children of Hell.”

b. Calvinists are ENEMIES of Muslims, they would NEVER join in battle with them unless it were coincidence and there is no historical record anywhere of Calvinists teaming up with Muslims. They are two opposing religions, it is Christian vs Islam, because Calvinism is not, like Catholicism a type of Christianity simply, IT IS, Christianity. It varies mainly in the two branches it is composed of: Presbyterian and Baptist and that concerns how to baptize and child baptism, other than that the differences are extremely obscure and most Calvinists don’t get into the differences, and even if they did, so what, they agree on “the fundamentals”, that is what makes them the same.

c. Why does Shoebat ignore that it isn’t just the Pope virtually commanding taking in any and every Muslim escapee, but that would it be, and it’s common sense being that he’s the head and has over a billion in his cult, but probably millions of other Catholics? The Pope and all the rest are part of the pantheon of gods in Catholicism, they and the popes claim that they embody Christ and represent him directly on Earth.

d. Shoebat nonsensically blame Protestants for Germany taking in many Muslims (OR ANY!) when Germany is only marginally lead by Christians at this time? Does their female leader espouse Christianity? That is never mentioned in the media, she is not known as a Christian of any sort but comes off as worldly. Was Hitler a Lutheran? No, Hitler was a narcissist politician who was more of an atheist witch and made passing comments about God to try and get the support of Lutherans. Shoebat, though blabbing about how much he hates Islam, LIKE THE FORMER MUSLIM HE WAS TRAINED TO BE uses the same reasoning that Muslims do to reject Christianity and call them crusaders when they literally fight Muslims (AND YET WHICH SHOEBAT HIMSELF WANTS THEM TO DO!!!) BECAUSE OF EVENTS, BATTLES OR WARS THAT HAPPENED OVER 1000 YEARS AGO! So because Germany was created Shoebat wrongly implies by Protestants (and Lutherans) HUNDREDS OF YEARS AGO it’s their fault Germany is taking in the evil Muslims, helping those evil Muslims, helping those needy strangers and their demon-kids, but just ignore the Pope and bless and worship him and do whatever else he says because, “he’s just erring by telling all the countries of the world to take in Syrian escapees). WHAT THE HELL!? That’s demonic babble.

e. When Shoebat mentions Calvinists in passing as something that was good to be rid of when they died in whatever death-event he’s talking about when he says they got swallowed up with Muslims, it is very notable that he DOES NOT EXPLAIN WHY THIS WAS A GOOD THING and ONLY mentions them once. A defender of Catholics would say, “Oh well that’s because he is not some demonically obsessed person trying to lay all blame on this true church you claim the Calvinists are, that’s you making them a strong focus, he just glances at them Mr. Knight and it’s you who are starring at them, you’re obsessed not Shoebat the faithful and wise Catholic theologian, you’re the lazy prophet, Daniel Knight, not him!” Not at all is that a good argument. For every Christian knows that one of Satan’s common tricks IS TO NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THE ENEMY or himself and to act like it is not some big deal or that it doesn’t exist and to misdirect and then when the enemies of Satan do show up and open their mouths to then directly attack them, the ones he pretended were of little importance, BUT IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO MENTION EVERY NOW AND THEN to make it clear they are enemies regardless of what little he says of them. Actions are as loud as words. Satan is always attacking the true church even if he does not say, “I am attacking you, true church, firing flaming arrows at you, I hate you.”

f. The Bible makes it plain, makes it clear that the needy INCLUDING YOUR ENEMIES are to be helped and FED and CLOTHED when they come to you lacking such or begging in their neediness for your help AND YOU CAN PROVIDE THAT HELP EVEN IN YOUR POVERTY. I’m not talking about the lazy and druggies and drunks coming and begging whatever from you when you are poor and when they can just as easily ask a wealthy person a few feet away but when someone in genuine need comes to you for help, even if it is simply to be on your land or the land of your country. Is it a sin when a Muslim kid or offspring of a Muslim who isn’t even sure what Islam is comes to you and asks or even just stands on your purchased land or with the traditional borders of your country, falls asleep there, eats, learns, converses there, or “goes to the bathroom” and buries it in the dirt or under rocks and leaves or if they are so young they don’t even think to do that? Are you sinning by helping that child or their parent who is fleeing violence and even if the parent is using you spitefully? No, the Bible says to help them regardless, to forgive them till time runs out and to pray for and bless them, to “do to them as you would yourself”.

g. Why is Shoebat silent about the Mexicans flooding into America? What if these weren’t Muslims but Mexican Catholics with the sole intent to drain wealth out of whatever country they “illegally” crossed into and then to return to their country when it becomes rich again in their minds or return themselves with riches once they get them? Are they any better than the Muslim who thinks to do the same? I know well many Mexicans who come into America act as if they are equal citizens illegal or not or whether or not their parents came in illegally or not, when coming in to even a little power, like a janitor of an apartment will treat native citizens (and native Americans aka Indians) who are not residents or customers of wherever they have been given power, if those people look poor, as bums to be insultingly scared off. “I’ll call the policia” or “call security” they will say, as if they are equals in every way, and regardless of their accent, giving away that they were not even born in America. Shouldn’t using Shoebat’s reasoning also be rejected? Yet Shoebat noticeably says little about the Mexicans who flood America. Why? BECAUSE MEXICANS ARE ALMOST ENTIRELY CATHOLIC, that is the only logical explanation. He also doesn’t say much as far as I can see, nothing, about closing America’s borders to Mexico when it is well known and always mentioned by conservatives everywhere that violent Muslims would and will likely use Mexico’s border to gain entry into America to destroy it. But how could Shoebat come off as a good and loyal Catholic if he preached thus to his own:

“Stay out of America Catholics of Mexico, don’t come here illegally you lowly Mexicans, for you may bring those horrid Muslims with you, they may worm their way in with you!”

Not only would tens of millions of racially Mexican people become hostile to Shoebat and his heretical babble but Catholics, so, he, in hypocrisy, does not preach a consistent doctrine. His hypocritical corruption is clear mark of his evil nature. Shoebat knows no doubt that America is heavily populated by Protestants, so do you think he would be against the Catholics overtaking the Protestants?! NO! It would be as he literally said, “good riddance” and he might say or think, “The sea of Mexican Catholics have swallowed them up.” That would include the following oppositional cults to the Catholic one being swallowed up: Episcopals, Anglicans, Methodists, Lutherans, and even more deviant cults that split off from them like the Mormon and Jehovah’s Witness/Watchtower and Seventh Day Adventist cults.

3. Shoebat refers to the ancient commentaries about who the beast is (they say Islamic) by referring to ancient CATHOLIC THEOLOGIANS even Augustine while he points out that Augustine whom he references was heavily influenced by a Catholic as evidence that it is indeed Islam-controlled. That’s like an evil police officer saying, “Look citizens, I’ll prove to you that traditionally it’s been you citizens that were the evil ones and not cops, look here at what the first cops said about citizens, ‘They are evil and always frustrating cops,’ and this was said by a guy who though not a cop was heavily influenced by cops!” HUH!??!?!?!?!? THAT’S A LOGICAL DEFENSE? You might as well scream: “I’M BIASED! THAT IS WHY I AM RIGHT!” So crazy is SANE in Shoebat’s mind.

h. While Catholicism and other cults become diluted and regress as a result of repeated confrontation with the truth, which depresses the, and which in turn causes them to try and forget by returning to their worldly nature Calvinism though in a minority remains solidly consistent, like a goad that despite being repeatedly kicked remains intact and hardened against damage. Understand this: the Bible makes it clear that in the last days it would get worse and worse till there would be a severe and sudden or rapid “falling away” of FALSE Christians. This as I said will happen, naturally, because (and thanks to God making the Internet wide spread and easy to use) they encounter the truth over and over, and clear truth that easily refutes any kind of complicated argument against it they come up with. So what are they to do, suffer repeated public humiliation, endlessly pretend the obvious during studies and sermons that they have no good or logical argument against the endless website that pop up when their cult is googled that clearly refute them and point out all the scandals involving their cults while Calvinists come out clean in the search results? So of course, they fall away sadly and are worse off. Because they knew part of the truth and rejected it. This article is but one of many evidences of that result that prove that that occurs (besides that Jesus outright said that would happen and that it was prophecied by Paul): http://www.christianpost.com/news/calvinist-evangelicals-in-a-united-methodist-church-133102. So as that site says, while United Methodism is coming up to extinction (and no doubt every other boring cult like it), Calvinists remain and continue to spread, EVEN IF there is no growth, Calvinists remain.

4. Finally a fatal flaw in Shoebat’s interpretation about Rome not being that city of evil Revelation mentions is that he fails to take into account that it is not Muslims that are always being possessed by demons, but Catholics, and Catholics even admit they get possessed by demons in large numbers, and demoniacs are always being brought to Rome to be exorcised and it often fails. The Bible even says it would be a haunt of demons after being destroyed. Further another mark of its evil the Bible points out is that is it a place where “the blood of the saints” was spilled, in such a huge number that God bothers to mention it and point this city out. According to historical records Rome was where PRE-CATHOLIC PAGANS (and please remember how similar polytheistic Catholicism is to its pagan-Roman ancestor of Zeus worship and worship of the other so called gods that served or vexed him) murdered not hundreds of thousands of Christians even, but many millions, and not just once, but many times. Catholics cannot even claim that the Catholic-hating/crusader-hating Muslims somehow killed millions of Catholics in Mecca, let alone Catholic “saints”. When was there millions or even thousands of saints till be killed over and over ANYWHERE let alone Mecca where Catholics don’t even exist (do they?!) and are not taken to to be killed. There is NO WAY around Rome being the place where millions of saints (which is a reference to Christians in Scripture, not “miracle workers”) died in mass, and over and over. No other city fits that description, NONE.

There is a woman named “marianne” on the Internet who also claims what Shoebat does about Mecca and Islam, and she points out (pointlessly) many cities associated with seven hills as if that somehow frees Rome of having to be a suspect. I said to her:

“You’re completely wrong, and misleading. what is the point in pointing out INSIGNIFICANT CITIES BY OR ON SEVEN HILLS?! You’re also coming up with a new theory, red flag. If Catholic you’re a hypocrite, biased. MECCA IS NOT A CITY IN WHICH THE BLOOD OF THE SAINTS HAS BEEN SPILLED IN MASS AND YOU MORON CATHOLICS DON’T EVEN DEFINE SAINTS RIGHT. OBVIOUSLY SUCH A LARGE NUMBER OF MIRACLE WORKERS AS YOU MORONS CALL THEM WERE NOT MURDERED IN MECCA, LET ALONE CHRISTIANS. THAT WAS IN ROME. You are ignorant of or forget this miss “look what discovered! now I know it all!”: Jesus said converts to false Christianity GET WORSE, become twice the children of Hell, and GOD SEES THROUGHOUT ALL TIME. So guess what he saw about polytheist pagan MASS-CHRISTIAN-MURDERING ROME (yeah you forgot that part right?! Blame Satan), CONVERT TO A FALSE POLYTHEIST FORM OF CHRISTIANITY THAT ALSO HAD PERVERTED VERSION OF MARY, A WHORE VERSION AS IT’S GODDESS OF LOVE? HE SAW IT GO FROM BAD TO WORSE, and like the Pharisees who whitewashed the gravestones of those prophets they murdered so the priests of that giant worldwide Catholic cult, and possibly Peter’s, pretending he was the first Pope even as a demonic insult to him.”

Shoebat is making an angry show about Protestants who are so rapidly dying out that it’s like trying to kill ants that have already been sprayed and are dying left and right by antkilling poison. Hate those ants! Ignore that they are dying rapidly out, hate them anyways, ignore the endless repeated faults of the Catholics and their rebel sister cults, just, be angry, at something else, the wind you can’t catch, bottle wind, throw it in the fire and hope the wind stops bothering you and causes us problems like the Jews that angered Hitler, which was just any Jew for being of the Jewish race, who cares about the good Jews, just kill them all. Shoebat wants to work the Protestants up into becoming angry Catholics that kill and or convert all the Muslims and if not to be swallowed by the sea. And supposing the Muslims do convert no doubt to me Shoebat would apparently keep them where they are because MAYBE they might be pretending to have been converted and will one day kill, a Catholic. Shoebat’s babble is so hostile towards Muslims and paranoid-like it seems he would have us all be distrustful even of the ones that claim to have converted, because they might be trojan horses for extremists, so then, keep them away like homeless beggars, because those homeless beggars might really use that food and money or the cheap phones you give them to make give the bad drug dealers and the murderous (CATHOLICS that head those drug dealers) a path to destroying the country they are begging in. Don’t even let them them beg in the streets holding up signs for help Shoebat seems to want all to agree on, instead let them drown and be swallowed up by the ocean! As Robert Sungenis once said to me an a reply when I asked why he was promoting killing heretics, he replied, “What’s wrong with killing heretics?” Ask Sungenis if you don’t believe me, if he was bold enough to send that email in private, knowing I could show it to others, there’s no reason for him to deny saying that unless of course you come at him with it in mass and scolding him left and right. But he’s bold enough to stand up for something half the world things is extremely absurd: Geocentrism (which I also believe in however), so he should be bold enough to admit that he has no problem with participating in mass killing/murdering “heretics”, which would be every protestant and even the sister cults of Catholicism.

The types of insane comments I have been pointing out that come from Shoebat are evidence that he has narcissistic personality disorder (I’ve studied it long and well enough to know the signs and encounter such people often in Las Vegas, I don’t need a degree or approval from atheists to label someone one, do I?). A narcissist is often a type who is new to the scene of what he is playing expert in, insults those traditionally thought of as experts and mentions them a little necessarily to make himself look like an expert but snubs them by then being silent about them, as if they are too stupid, lowly and worthless to say anything more about even though that narcissist holds a deep hatred of them inside and is obsessively focused on wanting to see them suffer and destroyed.

Because Shoebat is a narcissist (in my opinion, though I believe it to be a fact) than likely he’d be using Catholicism as a cover for his arbitrary hate (or demonic hate) which stems from his patholigical narcissism. Shoebat in my opinion is actually constantly angry at his imagined or real mistreatment as a child and blames Muslims for this, hence his hatred for Muslims, even the little children among them that he’d like to see swallowed up by the see and say “good riddance” to and latched on to Catholicism because it is GRAND, just as Hollywood culture repeatedly uses Catholics as heroes of sorts in any and every type of movie because unlike the true church which often dresses (and at the Bible’s command) plainly is not showy and grand enough to spice up their movies, especially made to try and make money from. Catholics love playing dress-up, love their leaders dressing in flowing white robes and in pretentious ways and the world loves it too because it’s something they can make money from and create fun drama over to dance to. “Look at me in my black suit and white collar, look at me in my flowing dress, look at me in my stark black robe, my purple and red colors, my crown.” It isn’t poverty that attracts narcissists, it’s grandiousity and power, getting attention and the power to bully their perceived enemies to satisfy their bitterness at the world in general. I’d even say that Shoebat would not be sad to see Catholics and Protestants and Muslims destroy each other till they are so weary they turn to Shoebat and say, “Oh Prophet, you were right, we were all at fault in some way, inferior to you, we were lazy, you are the greatest among us for realizing the truth, be our king,” and he’d either accept or shun them depending on how lowly, how impoverished they would be after all the fighting between them. “You don’t deserve me as your king,” he might say, “you should have all become Catholics and you Catholics should have rejected the Muslims! You’ve made me waste my breath and time dealing with you all, away from me you who came to me at the last second to admit that I was right!”

And of course there are always those who are so stubborn that when they read arguments like mine to the last word, want to say, “Oh, so you want to be worshiped, because you’re better than Shoebat and all the Catholics and so called cultists, and the atheists and the pagans, everyone. You’re so arrogant, you hypocrite!” Is that what I said, that I wanted to be worshiped? No. For salvation, don’t turn to Mary, to the perverted Catholic version of saints, don’t turn to angels, don’t go to a ouija board and ask Satan his thoughts, or ask the dead what to do, ask God instead to lead you to saving truth and to forgive you for disobeying his commandments and to for the rest of your life make you as obedient as possible and love the truth, be one with the truth. Don’t worship me, worship God alone, and God is fully in Christ and one with him, and always will be. God hasn’t repeatedly called Jesus “savior” and “rock” because we save ourselves, but because he can, has but one day salvation will no longer be offered because one day there will not be people who are born and become sinners. They will all be at perfect peace with God. Salvation is now, not after you die, take it before you get killed by a speeding car or have some other fatal encounter in this life.

Note: Though Catholics are a bad cult they are, decent Catholics that is “for Christ” and admit he’s God and a Hebrew. Anti-Christian Jews however blaspheme Christ by calling a magician or saying he never existed, and the worst commit the unforgiveable sin by sayiny he had a demon which blasphe emes God’s Spirit.

  1. George Milo Buck
    February 25, 2016 at 8:53 PM

    Some very cool insights, God bless you. Put a shoe and a bat together?! He converted from Baptist to Catholic!?! Digging your journal. Love your final proof : the place where “the blood of the saints” was spilled= Rome! I’ve been in the colliseum and the Vatican = I never felt further from the presence of God!

    • June 17, 2016 at 5:41 AM

      Unfortunately I am wrong, it isn’t Rome, but Jerusalem, ironically Catholic doctrine on who the whore is is correct. The saints that God meant were the prophets, not the non-prophets. Perhaps that is why Catholic tradition teaches saints are miracle-workers. More accurately they were the Jewish prophets, saints might also refer to any future prophets murdered there.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: