For people the millions, not billions of people with common sense, mainly Christians and those with a decent Christian upbringing and who haven’t gone atheist (which causes a loss of common sense) this article may seem a huge waste of time, but I’m both bored and very angry at Linda for perpetuating what is in excusable for her level of intelligence and wealth, and she clearly isn’t poor to be able to travel the world and hobnob with archeologist Schoch and interview many people for long hours. So, she’s obviously not some homeless drug addict with problems keeping her information together, lacking resting and research time and doing accurate research and note collecting therefore.
Linda, I have noticed, like many so called “researchers”, without any logical explanation, rejects evidence that her theories and logic are wrong regardless of how well such arguments or evidence is presented to them. And how many people these days have an excuse for being ignorant with such a useful and effective research tool as Google? Who is going to be able to say to God, in this age, unless living in North Korea and so on, “I had no way of knowing, I was totally distracted, no one told me, I had no time to think carefully.”? Though many could say this at various times in their life, if they lived to say 16 or 30, would any of those excuses be valid at all points in their life? Could a 16 year old say, “I never had time to consider if me pilfering and lying often might lead to an eternity in this so called Hell I lived in, and never had time to consider what Hell was about and who came up with the idea. I never considered how pilfering and lying to me all the time would destroy me, and therefore should not be done at all as to do it to others would likely lead back to destroying myself or making me a miserable person, and that therefore I should have done the opposite.” Likewise what excuses does Linda have for rejecting the evidence against the Big Bang, evolution, global warming/(disastrous long term) climate change (her claims of aliens doing this and that and why, all of which she speaks up repeatedly as fact in various ways? Her only excuse would be the common ones, including “Satan was blinding me, deluding me.”
Linda does not give any clear evidence for her claims on those subjects, she comes up with anonymous witnesses or witnesses who can’t verify their identity despite claiming to be General Zod So and So or ex-CIA official of the whatever project, and yet speaks of her interviewees as if they were totally credible, and in her last show on Coast to Coast AM gave a dead give away as to her wrong methodology of determining the truth of what she has heard and believes, she said, “I feel as if I am getting closer to the truth.” SHE FEELS? New Age Hippie talk! You don’t FEEL if you are getting to the close with Grand Unified Theory or complex math or much of anything in the world unless you were a poorly raised person who was taught New Age garbage as a way of getting through life. You don’t FEEL how to operate an ipod, as in with your heart, you use your brain, mind and REASON IT OUT, you have specific thoughts, you don’t use your heart mainly, unless, again, you were raised with poor reasoning methods to figure out many things in life. As is CLEAR, super clear from this world, to do that leads to endless fights, wars, divorces, misunderstandings and arguments. YOU REASON THINGS OUT WITH YOUR MIND WITH SPECIFIC THOUGHTS, not vague feelings. The heart is absolutely useful for living life happily and impossible to without it, but it is not to be the main mind with which we reason the truth out. The heart is a feelings machine, it doesn’t have specific thoughts, it can’t, it wasn’t designed for that, it wasn’t designed to reason, and even if it does have some reasoning ability, it would be highly prone to error in our corrupted state, a state in which all of the humans here on Earth are addicted to doing wrong or have lingering addictions for doing so, such as Christians God has forgiven. Because of our desire to disobey God, to go our own way, a problem which our heart is in large part responsible for, hearts which steer us away from logical reasoning and logical acts, we cannot rely at all on feelings MAINLY to determine what is true or not, and yet Linda consistently uses a naive feelings-based method of determining true from false. She’s even inexplicably oblivious to her own findings. For example the biggest of all I see is that though she knows “mainstream science”, more accurately “mainstream scientists” reject her alien theories and many at least publicly say aliens aren’t here or likely never have been, and reject things absurdly, why then does she have utter and absolute trust in them when they claim “such and such is billions of years old” (and consider the outrageous length of time a billion let alone million years is) and regardless of that extraordinary claim of length of time passing, she takes their word for it without a care if whether or not they might be deliberately lying or that their logic could be highly compromised given that they, at least in her mind, absurdly reject the possibility that aliens have been coming here recently and other obvious possible phenomenon, having no good reason to doubt their possibility at least. Linda, concerning mainstream scientists, whom she doesn’t seem to realize are mainly atheists and Catholics, whom she seems to think are absurd, makes the mistake of “Appeal to Authority”, or rather says such and such is fact because these scholars say it is so, and yet, without any logical explanation, rejects their testimony or claims when they say why it is absurd that aliens would be here or have been or that these flying metallic discs people often see and other such things are just people misidentifying birds, planes, clouds, stars, the moon, clouds, or lens/camera effects or that they are lying or hallucinating. How does she reason they are trustworthy on one subject, completely trustworthy, but despite their clear bias or fear of saying the truth on the other, reason they can’t be trusted and that their reasoning on that should be totally rejected or given little consideration? CLEARLY, Linda’s reasoning is highly flawed and herself not trustworthy overall. She can repeat what people say, and put her own emotional tone into it, but that doesn’t make it true, or false, and her reasoning is clearly not to be trusted. And she does not even offer much of what could be called “reasoning” anywhere anyways. She’s like a storyteller telling stories to children, trying to entertain them.
Even more nonsensical about the way Linda reasons, is that she had at one point on Coast, spoken of the Bible as historical, if I remember right, she was referring to Ezekiel (a book famous for it’s verses about what many wrongly say refer to UFOs and aliens from outerspace). If the Bible is historical, why then in general does she not refer to it for anything else, like moral truths, historical facts other than that UFOs arrived and aliens showed themselves? And no doubt she believes that in Exodus those great miraculous events were caused by aliens, and so why then would she ignore the ten commandments? Linda is the type who, due to what I believe is demonic delusion, as in demons interfering with her ability to reason and feel rationally seeks out the “exciting” in her mind, the type who only wants to dwell on what is “amazing”, the visual things or things others saw that were dark and ominous or a light show or that made ominous or amazing sounds (she likes to talk about unexplained sounds for those who don’t know). But when it comes to morality, to law, to justice and mercy, she thinks of them as boring and bland and of little importance. She illogically disconnects the miracles, the visual and auditory shows God (or whoever) creates from the rest of the story, the rest of the testimony of those who said they saw them. To her, the glowing angel is the object of worship or the things it does, not God.
In all Linda’s news reports there is also a glaring absence of supernatural phenomenon, specifically of demon possessions, hauntings, and even cryptozoology reports. Why does she focus on one and not the others? Some may say, “It’s just her personality and area of expertise, she chooses to specialize in such and such.” However Linda clearly, from her website, has plenty of time to report on these other subjects and she must know how limited what she can do into finding out more about some sighting of a glowing object will be or some anonymous claim of aliens. What else is she doing all day that she doesn’t look into some ancient demon possession in the Catholic cult/sect/Church or modern one, publicizing what these supposed demons said, or doesn’t publicize prophecies and on and on? Is it because she is strongly repelled by religion, that her soul abhors coming close to the subject of goodness, morality, right from wrong, ultimate TRUTH, God? It is true what God said, and he said it FIVE times, it concerns mankind’s total lack of goodness:
“The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good. The Lord looks down from heaven on the children of man, to see if there are any who understand, who seek after God. They have all turned aside; together they have become corrupt; there is none who does good, not even one. Have they no knowledge…” – Psalm 14:1 and 3, and Psalm 53:1 and 3 and Romans 3:9-11
I also thought of this verse here that I put in bold, when thinking of Linda, coming to the end of finishing this article:
“They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth. Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so also these teachers oppose the truth. They are men of depraved minds, who, as far as the faith is concerned, are rejected.” – 2 Timothy 3:6-8
A typical anti-religion moron I’m guessing posted an article I didn’t even bother reading because of it’s clearly stupid titles, which summed up was, “Science proves bigfoot doesn’t exist”. Specifically the titles were, “Bigfoot Is Not Real, Says Science” and “Science Delivers a Big Blow to Bigfoot”. Apparently James decided that another scientist, a genetic scientist who analyzed DNA samples claimed to be from various bigfoot creatures who with many speeches explained why the DNA likely was what it was claimed to be doesn’t count, cuz James Temple who made those titles or went with them SAID SO, not science. No delusional idiot, science doesn’t say whatever you in your arrogant delusional reality-hating mind whatever you feel it does, it doesn’t agree with your feelings and personal opinions and happen to agree with all your anti-Bible and anti-reason and anti-logic babble. Learn what logical fallacies are and stop being an extreme idiot already James Temple. “Science” also said living fossils shouldn’t exist, yet they do you fact-ignoring ape.Could anyone make a dumber claim, how about “Science proves religion doesn’t work”? “Science” says, so say atheists and anti-Bible morons, that the Bible is wrong, and yet those claims are repeatedly proven wrong. Science supposedly said the Shroud of Turin was a fake, and yet science also said afterwards that that claim was unscientific. Science according to many atheists and cultists has made God and the Bible obsolete. How so? A better shovel doesn’t make God obsolete, and a better computer won’t defeat God’s will, how could they? Could science rather have proved God repeatedly, and many assume it’s not so and so don’t bother to look into such research? Science has been repeatedly used successfully to show that God does exist by putting his word to the test. And if God does exist, what matters most is what his will is, because if you anger him, and it’s true his will is send most people to Hell who do disobey him, I hope you wouldn’t want to end up being one of those he decides to get rid of.
God’s will, what is it? Could it, might it, be in that most popular book for hundreds of years now, that lengthy often taught, most influential book, which even the Quran took from, clearly, that most translated book, that most free and sold book called “The Bible”, “The Scriptures”,, “Scripture”, “The scroll”, “God’s word’? If God asks why you ignored this book with it’s clearly good ’10 commandments’ and it’s two greatest laws, the second being Love your neighbor as yourself, and which Jesus said could all be summarized as As you would have done to you so do to others, which even atheists pretentiously claim is a golden rule, even theirs, and in their evil arrogance and deliberate ignorance often fail to credit to Christ (because they refuse to know God’s word and true history, and rather would have a history in their own image), how will anyone on a Day of Judgment be able to say to God, “I had no clue, not even one, that this ‘Bible’ was a rational or good book in anyway, not even good for historical reference, and might have even contained a lead to what your actual personality, will and laws were?” Though a corrupt Bible would be an unreliable one, one not sure for knowing God’s will, a Bible that only had minor corruptions due to inaccurate translating and copying could not be said to be unreliable anymore than any other book with minor translations and copying wrong. And if it is God’s word, who but the stupid, those who don’t care about truth despite any of their claims to the opposite, the impatient and the greedy would say, “Because these parts are in doubt, throw it all out,’ and “throw the baby out with the bathwater”? Those with a childish temperment and a morality- and logic-hating mind would say so. The ancient sage Jon Calvin aka John Calvin correctly taught God’s word and the truth of the spiritual state of mankind. Many Christians, including those who deny Christ like the giant Catholic cult, something the Bible predicts would be done in the last days by so called Christians, falsely claim that salvation is something you earn and that can be lost, using nonsensical and careless reasoning, merely repeating what was repeated to them and being to lazy and angry at God, too impatient and too prideful to understand why what that claim is wrong. They won’t even make a sincere prayer to God to know the truth about what they are really like in his eyes and how salvation from Hell works, they lack a fear of Hell, of God’s wrath and imagination of how bad an eternity of suffering would be to motivate them to know how to save themselves from such a possibility. If no one prays to God for the salvation of such care-free people, if no one teaches them the truth, people who care about everything else but pleasing God and truly loving him and not just thinking they love him, not caring if that claim to love him is a delusion, will God be motivated to save them? Will he be motivated to act to rescue them soon? Even if he does, if no one prays for such, their salvation would be late in life most likely and their good deeds therefore most likely few, and therefore any eternal rewards too they could earn fewer than those who lived a long life under God’s eternal salvation, eternal forgiveness, eternal love. And God, unlike what the majority teach, the world that is, including the Christian cults of the world, not the true Christian “church”, not the true saints, DOES NOT LOVE EVERYONE, why else would the Bible repeatedly say God’s WRATH, which means “intense anger” is “ON’ the world? Why else would Hell be ETERNAL and not a temporary punishment leading to the benefit of the world he supposedly loves according to the many deluded? Scripture is clear on how God feels about all whom he has not yet forgiven, and the world it says that is headed for eternal punishment by “torturers”: “You hate all who do wrong.” – Psalm 5:5, and that he is angry with the wicked every day. One cult ignored and ignores this, and in the passage with the bow, ignoring that bow sentence focuses on instead the verse more clear above it, God being angry every day with the wicked, and twists it to mean something that doesn’t mean that at all, they are obvious liars and do not love God, if they did, they would teach the truth about what angers God: disobedience, more specifically, those who disobey him with everything they do by failing to obey him out of love, rather than by chance or who obey to a shallow degree, but always without love, simply to avoid the feeling of guilt, a loss of a job and therefore income, and a concern for how everyone else but God would think of them, and to avoid a greater punishment in Hell. The one God loves love him back, the greater amount of sins Christ covered by his life-sacrifice the greater their love and desire to please him they will have. The ones whom Christ did not cover, did not suffer or die for but left to suffer it out eternally themselves, they won’t, unfortunately, ever love God, they may have some love for a false version of God, a spiritual idol that cannot save and in any way defeat the true living God. Those with a false image of God think it loves them or even hates them or is angry over something they did wrong, something that isn’t even wrong according to the Bible and even a good thing like judging others to be not good when they all their lives do what is not good and never show love for God (how is it obvious such people are NOT good?), but they will not have love for the true God and never will unless he loves them first. When God changes the heart of a person to love him and shun disobeying him, it is because he also desires to and will forgive them forever and make them a permanent son or daughter that WILL “stand before him”, unlike the wicked, the evil ones whom God the scriptures say “cannot stand before God” in his presence. Nor will they ever see his face. They will see many other things perhaps, especially his wrath and the angry face of his son, and the look of love on his face for those he of his own free will chose to save, but not the face of God, no more than love for them. God in his goodness desires that everyone love him, that everyone love to do right and does right, but it is not his will, the desire of his mind; in his wisdom he has chosen that the majority of people born in this dark age from Adam’s sin to before Christ returns to rule while those who hate him still exist (which will be the “1000 year reign of Christ” before all the unsaved are permanently done away with in Hell and sin prevented in anyone born since that time), he has chosen that many do sin and do so forever, even in Hell to serve as an eternal example of what a failure to love God and his not loving them results in. It is an example that God will eternally use to, successfully, not just by his love and his acts of love, to persuade those who have a good spirit from desiring to do wrong, in other words to sin, to disobey his laws, laws which are a part of his written will for how we should live. Live to do good and good will happen to you forever, live to do evil and you will be eternally blocked from this universe and shut out from God’s love.