Archive for September, 2012

Liberal Bullying — YouTube (and CNN) Censor Free Speech and Christians

September 30, 2012 2 comments

A few days ago, I noticed some extremely harsh atheist trolls raving over me and another Christian posting rebuttals to a claim on a video in which a naturist claimed evolution was true. I first saw whiny complaints by a few atheists on YouTube doing the usual: whining about seeing comments about God, and demanding and commanding those mentioning him to not mention him, and one atheist used a typical immature cliche, saying to “get your ass back to church” and talk about God there. There were various insults as always, but none from the Christian, till I came in to rebuke them for their stupidity and trying to take God’s place and them preaching their own version of morality, that being to not talk about God or religion whenever it didn’t meet their approval. These are typical liberal morons who like the liberals that call to conservative radio shows, or who hear them, complain about them, as if they are forced to listen.

A very short while after, I got this email:

The YouTube Community has flagged one or more of your videos as inappropriate. Once a video is flagged, it is reviewed by the YouTube Team against our Community Guidelines. Upon review, we have determined that the following video(s) contain content in violation of these guidelines, and have been disabled:

Bombardier Beetle vs Solpugid aka Camel spider aka Sun spider aka Wind scorpion –

Your account has received one Community Guidelines warning strike, which will expire in six months. Additional violations may result in the temporary disabling of your ability to post content to YouTube and/or the permanent termination of your account.

For more information on YouTube’s Community Guidelines and how they are enforced, please visit the help center.

The YouTube Team

After reading the comment I tried to post on someone elses video who had complained about the same thing happening to him, but noticed I couldn’t post a comment. I wasted about 10 minutes trying! Then I clicked my account only to get a warning message saying blah blah you did such and such wrong and making me acknowledge I read it. I then was able to go back to posting comments. But was there any appeal button? No, instead, these morons force you to use Google to figure out how to appeal the accusation or naturally have you search their help section. When I searched through their help section, I tried to complain about harassment, which was true, however it wouldn’t work with Firefox 14, and was getting a message in broken English, to select something, yet I had selected “something”. There was nothing left to fill out. I then tried to start over only for it to be stuck with the harassment button being selected, and unable to break out of it and continue the process of the complaint. SO THEN, I opened up Internet Explorer and this time decided to go read everything else that applied to my situation, only to go around TWICE IN A CIRCLE, as there was no genuine method of CONTACTING THEM AS THEIR SITE CLAIMED COULD BE DONE. ANOTHER TEN MINUTES OF MY LIFE DOWN THEIR TOILET OF CONTEMPT FOR THEIR CUSTOMERS.

I then Googled how to appeal a video being removed and saw on top a YouTube video from a user, not a YouTube “team member” that pointed me to YouTube’s official (and pathetic and obviously ignored) blog on . I then, as others had done, left my complaint, AND TRIED ABOUT SIX TIMES TO DO SO, TRIED SIX TIMES BECAUSE EACH TIME THE CAPTCHA ENTRY WAS REJECTED! MORE OF MY LIFE DOWN THE DRAIN. The reason it was failing is because the captchas were using tiny numbers in blocks, which were so blurry or small that I thought it was just part of the mess meant to fool spam bots. Finally I got a comment through, so I thought. I then saw it had to be approved by the moderator. I then looked carefully at the comments left, and noticed that some of the comments that were approved were clearly junk comments, not even serious, just nonsense. Now here was a great lie YouTube made, because in its help section, or that blog, they claimed they really did have moderators evaluating flagged videos 24 hours a day. Now if these moderators are doing that, if they are competent, why did they approve comments not related to that page on flagged videos and why did they reject my appeal!?:

Thank you for submitting your video appeal to YouTube.

After further review of the content, we’ve determined that your video does violate our Community Guidelines and have upheld our original decision. We appreciate your understanding.


— The YouTube Team”

Can anyone explain how my video is a violation, when nothing was harmed, yet approves of insects being put together in a tight space for the purpose of seeing which will kill each other first, and as the spectators clearly hope to see, in some amazing way or why they approve of animals being eaten alive, or a kitten being used as a machine gun? I can go on, and on, and on, and on, including asking why they approve of little girls dancing in sexual ways, little as in three to eleven years old and a baby being attacked by a cobra a boy drowning a pet snake. Everyone has seen certain ones. Consider also this: that video, mine, which they banned, had under 1,500 views, yet the videos I’ve mentioned have millions of views, with the exception of the machine gun cat video having over about 320,000 views. How about the Man Vs Wild series: is it necessary for Bear Grylls to rip the tentacles off a living octopus, cut the tail ends off scorpions without first killing it, and on, and on, and on, rather than eat animals killed quickly like everyone else? Does anyone think that an octopus with its large brain felt any pain having its tentacles being ripped off? Can anyone say YouTube’s moderators are “anti-Christian sickos”? Obviously they are.

How can liberals and atheists expect to be seen as the most peaceful and rational among all the humans if they are conniving psychopaths and bullies who can’t tolerate disagreement or seeing God being put in a good light, or even a comment that expressed a mere disbelief in evolution theory, a theory for which there is NO EVIDENCE, but rather, a huge amount of evidence against, as my Twitter feed and journal thoroughly documents, as can easily be learned from a few hours of research, or even thought experiments? Did it ever occur to anyone that extremely small bacteria can’t just know what and how to eat without having been deliberately programmed? And even the smallest bacteria aren’t just “simple”, it’s not like you can make one for a few dollars or even with a $1,000,000, you’d need millions to make synthetic bacteria even with America and Japan’s state of the art technology, and you’d still need to use parts that came from a living one just to make a synthetic one. How can baby animals be born knowing how to breath, how to instantly walk, how did such sophisticated programming come about, where did the laws come from that allowed for that? Are the laws of this universe simple? Unlike math, which can’t be engineered, for example 2+2 simply = 4, there is nothing you can do to change that, it is an eternal truth, unlike math, the physics laws of this universe are variable, in that atoms, electrons, particles and dimensions can be changed, if you had God’s powers, so why are the laws of this universe the way they are, and not some other way? Again, it’s not like math truths, because truths can’t be changed no matter what. You could come up with a new math problem, but nothing will change about what the answer will be.

Obvious conclusion: YouTube/Google Corporation is a violation of logic and common sense, it approves of bullying Christians whom it thinks no one will notice being picked on, and is composed of moderators that are no better than the trolls cyberbullying, stalking and harassing other users in various ways. And now YouTube too makes it on the list of my Cyberstalking Hall of Shame, the entire corporation. I have also begun a boycott of YouTube.

Update: I just found out, at about 6:25 AM, that CNN had blocked me, when I went to read the comments about Syria’s president supposedly going to demolish Syrian homes in Hama, I didn’t even intend to say anything. I noticed before reading any, this comment with a beige background: “This site has blocked you from making comments.” I hadn’t made comments for a long time there except for some recent ones, which were about that girl who was elected as a prank as home coming queen. What oh so offensive things did I say that violated the (liberal) Community Guidelines? This: “Stand up for what you believe in and go with your heart and go with your gut. That’s what I did, and look at me now. I’m just as happy as can be!”Good job peers: you just helped spread liberal new age nonsense, the kind that gets people into fights and causes bullying.” I may have said something like that it leads to psychopathy and narcissism and, “Read narcissism. tk” (a website I wrote on the signs of narcissism and psychopath disorder). Not sure if I said the bullying part of if I quote the happy as can be part, but that’s about exactly what I said. It was the 43rd comment (so big surprise it got noticed and of course infuriated the liberals who saw it in mass and pressed that report button). I had posted it about three times, because I saw that CNNs comment system and mangled my paragraph by breaking it up in bizarre ways, so I tried again, and it did the same thing, and once more. I then posted a comment saying, “Why the Hell does CNN keep breaking up my comments dammit!?” (And keep in mind that before hand when I would type out a 8 word paragraph, it would put my comment in moderation. Highly suspicious, it was as if some moderator flagged me for being an anti-liberal and then made it so all my comments would have to be approved of first from then on. I wouldn’t be surprised if earlier comments had been removed without letting me know.

So after my little complaint, I quickly replied to another guy who angered at least one person I saw. He had made a comment like, “Can someone explain this?” and in another comment implied, if I remember right, something like she wasn’t pretty. To his first though I replied, “They didn’t elect someone based on their beauty this time.” Some short comment like that. As millions know, comments like that, even if not inherently rude, and simply repeating what the article itself implies, that IT WAS A PRANK, NOT AN ELECTION OF BEAUTY, will, if liberals or cultists, like self-righteous type Catholics (and note, Catholics, I didn’t say all of you, so don’t freak out you sloppily reading self-righteous arrogant ones) see that you’re opposed to them, will gang up on you and attack you in some way. Even on a pro-conservative site like Infowars, banned me once for criticizing Alex Jones for being an narcissist I’m guessing, or perhaps they didn’t like me typing the link to show the signs as evidence that he had it rather than just limiting me to typing out the signs, and forcing me in a way then to make a long comment. They do put comments that use urls into moderation just like CNN does. So, I don’t bother using the http:// or www in the links, so that my comment can immediately go through. I just signed up again and (not intentionally as some revenge) continued making the usual comments, for many months now, and even saying more shocking things, that might even repel some of Alex’s Catholic supporters. I said recently for example… oh wait, I just realized I could get arrested for hate speech if I say lol, never mind… Stupid liberals. See how liberalism and atheism are partners in crime and lead to oppression, persecution, intolerance, irrationality, hate, fights, suppression of “free speech”, suppression of all the things they claim they themselves are against, yet do themselves, including by silent actions like banning and removal of things their opposition says. How can you trust people that don’t even mention what you say, and hide it from others, when you state facts, and merely because your belief system doesn’t agree with theirs? Isn’t that atheist communism or Marxism? Isn’t that a dictatorship or rule by mob? America will end up like North Korea, Cuba, Haiti or Syria, if liberals (and psychopaths and narcissists) gain even greater power than they have now. If they do, then worse cultist belief systems will take hold, like communism, Mormonism, and Catholicism (and remember what the Catholics did to Europe and South America and Haiti when they had the greatest power? Remember what the Muslim Moors did to Europe when they had the greatest power?)

Still not convinced? Then consider this: a few days ago Piers Morgan interviewed and allowed the narcissist, racist, murderer and dictator Ahmadinejad (or who plays one at least), even shook his hand and praised him with a dreamy loving smile, even after Ahm. had few minutes before said that homosexuality was an ugly act, and after Piers, in defense of homosexuals being naturally born being attracted to the same sex, gave a passionate emphatic, “Yes I absolutely believe that” (about babies being born to be sexually attracted to others of the same sex). So, CNN will allow this blatantly evil person, a narcissist, to say what he wants, but blocks me for pointing out that people like him and Piers are the type who start arguments and fights by appealing to emotion rather than reason and truth above emotion, and for saying that narcissists should be ignored. Liberalism leads to destruction, more generally: disobedience to God leads to eternal pain for those who disobey him.

If the conservatives, including the conservatives in cults, like the Mormons and Catholics do not rise up against the liberals, then America is doomed, unless God intervenes. I believe that within the next 20 years, most of the world’s population will be wiped out, with less than 13 million people left, a number far fewer than was even proposed on the depopulist Georgia Guidestones, which recommends that 500,000,000 be allowed to live. I am sure, that due to the heavy persecution of his children, and the much worse persecution to come upon them all in general, that God will not allow so many non-Christians to live. Instead he reward them with a shocking massacre, and near lethal blows, just as he did to Israel many times, even to the time of Hitler.

By the way, I noticed something very odd happened right after I tried to post an update to this article about CNN blocking me: my Logitech wireless keyboard malfunctioned, so that it would no longer work. No matter how many times I turned it off and on and mashed and shook and hit it, and even when disconnecting the USB transmitted and plugging it in again, it wouldn’t work. It would only light up (it had back lighting). It made me wonder if Satan had crept up close to me. Or maybe it was because I’d recently washed it with sanitizer wipes and the moisture (hours later?!) somehow messed it up. I don’t see how though since the wipes weren’t dripping. It was an expensive keyboard, so, if it doesn’t cost much to have it repaired, I may do so.

Update: Yesterday (10/22/2012) I posted a comment on CNN’s article on Amazon’s server problems “taking down Reddit”, it was, “Good, I hope God continues to hammer away at that atheist cesspool of sin,” which got the reply, “Wouldn’t that be a conflict of interest, he rented out space on that server” and some little lame quip not worth remembering, a troll like comment from someone who had made over 950 comments on CNN I think. I gave him a sharp reply telling him to get a life. So what did CNN do?: They removed ALL the comments, the original I made and the replies and my second reply, AND, failed to post any of my other similar replies, including one in which I asked if anyone had noticed Amazon having server problems on their home website as I have in the past4 days (5 days now). That’s liberalism for you: not just censoring Christian speech, but BIASED censoring, as in apparently, someone remembers me as being a Christian, or sees me making pro-Christian comments, then decides to be heavy handed with me if I dare defend myself against persons on CNN that troll. And how hypocritical, being that CNN a day or two before posted a front page news story about a REDDIT troll posting sexual garbage all over Reddit and getting over 800,000 subscriptions (which would mainly be from atheists, pagans (like Wiccans and witches) and Catholics (Catholics often secretly engage in activities against their religion). Apparently CNN wasn’t posting the article in disapproval, but throwing it up in the air so that it could be taken either way: they would look righteous to the those against trolling, or doing good by promoting an atheist website and helping air the “troll’s” apology. What hypocrisy.

Obama, Romney, Pros and Cons, Whose Worse?

September 22, 2012 Leave a comment


Not a direct destroyer of human life, at least in America, rather, he takes his time, as all previous presidents have. I’m talking about war, and assassinations of non-leaders.
Though he may be godless, an atheist, he promotes at least Islam, a god-centered religion.


1) Has psychopathic narcissism disorder, not merely narcissism disorder and is therefore a chronic liar, a big liar, tells many lies, is unempathetic, has no conscience, prone to sudden temper tantrums, not willing to listen to opposition except from a distance, and is only interested in using their words against them rather than trying to work with them, unless he is under extreme pressure to do so.
2) Promotes Islam (when he thinks it’s to his advantage). Islam is a polytheistic cult which in which cult members worship Mohammed and Allah and somewhat a little rock in Medina). Besides polytheist, it’s violent, sexist, racist, promotes bestiality and homosexuality and misteaches the trinity of the Bible. It’s cult founder was also a narcissist, a mass murderer and perhaps a schizophrenic one.
3) War mongering
4) Supports and indirectly encourages brutal abortions by the millions with a cold and smug attitude
5) Indirectly takes bribes
6) Wants to convert America’s government to a dictatorship (under the pretense of socialism)
7) A boaster
8) At best, a naturalized citizen of the US, but is apparently trying to impoverish America, or at best, equalize the wealth of everyone (though with the hope that the conservative-leaning Christians will be more weakened than the liberal ones and non-Christians)
9) Divisive, encourages racism by race-flaming
10) Supports liberalism (and in contradiction, Islam too), liberalism is nearly the same as socialism and libertinism, which are very destructive philosophies
11) Favors the rich (gave trillions to banks who, despite that, now will not loan money to the poor, and Obama has increased the debt of the poor by doing so)
Romney [this was accidentally placed in Romney’s section under pros for a few weeks, sorry about the confusion]


1) Promotes capitalism
2) Against socialism
3) Not godless
4) Against strong sexual perversion
5) Encourages hard work over laziness
6) A humble manner in contrast to Obama’s haughty manner
7) Is wealthy, so isn’t prone to bribes


1) Extremely arrogant: Since becoming rich and not needing to do hard manual labor, and his comment about those who believe they are victims (the 47% that support Obama), has become callous towards the poor (which may have changed a little and motivated him to make plans should he become president, to help these 47% maintain their or increase their current government benefits, being that his comment was exposed, lest his family name be cast down and Mormonism is shamed and dwindles). Further evidence of his extreme arrogance is his comment to this teacher here
2) Indirectly promotes a clearly polytheistic religion created by the narcissist Joseph Smith, who was also a sexist, adulterer, sex offender, brawl-lover, attempted mass murder in a failed war (which also ended up being a false prophecy being that he said he’d win it and is therefore a false prophet), got into a gun fight before his death. Joseph even attempted to rewrite the Bible, unlike Mohammed, who, at least the Quran says, said that the Bible was God’s word. These are many horrible to be. Joseph also caused a kind of indirect racism by confusing what it meant to be a “Jew”. Joseph deceived his followers into believing that not only were native Americans Jews, but so were Mormons, thereby defaming actual Jews and spiritually stealing their birth right. Joseph was also a sorcerer and would spend time in secret with a prostitute. He also appeared to deliberately go against God’s command to be fruitful and multiple, because despite having many wives, only had one or two children (he was deliberately avoiding having many children and depriving his wives of having children, which in turn impacted their salvation too, since having a child can cause a woman to truly turn to Christ).
3) Panders, of course, and uses flattery
4) A boaster: commits the sin that the Bible says not to: boasting about things other than knowing and understanding God, making claims about the future that are not even close to a sure thing
5) Seems to support ultimately a dictatorship being that he supports the patriot act and the NDAA act, which, basically makes him equal to Obama.
6) Probably favors the rich just as Obama does (if he doesn’t he’ll lose the election for sure being that the rich have the money to influence the masses to support or destroy him)
7) Is in favor of abortion for the same reasons Obama pretends to have (video evidence). And though he has three exceptions, still, abortionists themselves are extremely evil, and would of course make up reasons to help the girl wanting an abortion to get one due to their psychopathic love for murdering babies and getting some sort of perverted sexual pleasure no doubt out of doing so
8) Now here is a pro that could change everything: Being that Romney is not mentally ill, as in doesn’t seem, to me at least, to have any anti-social personality disorder, a permanent kind, like narcissism disorder (the best example that he doesn’t have it is his admission that he was wrong to say what he did about those relying on food stamps, a narcissist would be highly unlikely to make such an admission, and casually as he did – count the number of times Obama has ever admitted to being wrong about anything), and being that he most likely doesn’t have any anti-social disorder, there is a possibility he can improve, maybe even become a true Christian, and that might make the difference in saving one to a million or more lives, maybe even the country, or someone else’s country.

Both candidates also no doubt will continue the same oppressive laws and policies of corrections systems, so that more money will be lost to paying fines to the national or state governments or time wasted in jail or prison, and the poor will be hit the hardest. This will cause suicides to basically remain the same, or get ever worse, and poverty to continue, as it is oppressive laws and an oppressive corrections system that is one of the main problems of America, not selling, buying or using “illegal” drugs.

Whose worse? Whose better? From these facts and likelihoods, Romney is technically worse. That is because Romney was raised with some Mormon morals, which are a shadow of the Bible’s, and therefore knows better then to support baby-murder and abducting people merely on suspicion of being a danger to the lives of other Americans and imprisoning them without giving them their Biblical right to a trial by other men or women. He’s also openly against sexual perversion. Romney probably has a little conscience at least, from having been raised a Mormon however, so he would lean more towards doing moral things than Obama would, and keeping any promises he makes to the poor (and rich). Compare that to former President Bush Junior, who, due to his lack of concern and competence due to a clearly poor religious upbringing (his dad was no one moral, though was a incredibly shrewd and cunning man), cheated stock partners and got Americans killed from the 9/11 inside job. And he allowed the culprits to go free, with his help (he wouldn’t allow Cheney or himself to go under a proper trial or inquiry). He has also made no apparent effort to find out what happened to the missing passengers of the hijacked planes, to find out if they really on board, and where they are being held.

Romney so far hasn’t displayed any psychopathic coldness or stupidity like that. And Romney, though more condemnable than Obama (because unlike Obama’s lack of conscience to help him do right, Romney probably has a little conscience). Because of that, he MIGHT be more beneficial as the world as the leader of America, but by a few hairs.

So, I would say, there is no point in voting for either of these presidents unless you consider that Romney’s support of less government and more independence, including from government run schools, a significant reason. It would be better to vote for Ron Paul, whether he’s still running or not. At worst, Ron Paul would leave things as they are, leaving the states to themselves.

My Thoughts On What the Agenda Is of Obama and Romney:

From careful observation, it appears that they are trying to become dictators, or pave the way for someone who is trying to become one (the antiChrist?). This is why I believe this:

1) They approve of both the Patriot Act and NDAA. It could be argued they merely did this to get back at malicious people attacking them (like cyber harassers on the Internet or slanderous/libelous people they’d desire to get back at). Even so, that gives them dictatorship power, and they know it I’m sure.

2) US Marshals, who are basically government/federal police with jurisdiction in all states and US territories, are being used to enforce warrants even for the most petty of things, even with only one accuser, and with NO EVIDENCE. Why?: To work their way in to increasing their control over whatever they want to control. It’s a way of getting local police to letting the government intervene whenever they want to. For example, say the president personally doesn’t like some blogger, because of something he said on his blog about him. He could then get the CIA to identify the blogger (if possible) under the guise of the blogger being a potential threat, then after getting an address, and then have the local police make a warrant out for this persons arrest for something petty, like “indecent communication”. The local police, after failing, then could, from the advice of some government recommendation, save themselves money and time and simply call on the marshals to try and capture this blogger. And if the president is angry enough (or Congressman or governor, etc.), he could instruct the marshals to regularly hound the blogger at his residence, or hang out and wait for him till the man is caught. The marshals could then deliver this message in private: “Take down the article you wrote about Obama, about him being mentally ill, otherwise the next time we’ll be driving you to federal prison instead of a local jail, and we’ll never let you out if you end up in federal.”

3) The effect of impoverishing the states while increasing the wealth of the government, makes the local police more vulnerable to being taken advantage of and marginalized, and more prone to allowing certain drug cartels (if the president approves) to sell drugs in the US so long as they are paying a bribe to the government. Because federal government is harder to investigate than local government (and the feds know this), they can more easily hire corrupt government police, who would be willing to, ultimately, replace local police, so that this drug deal can go on unhindered and unexposed. Eventually the local (state) police may entirely be eliminated, so that the only police, are government police, and military police under the control of the most powerful warmongering businesses: oil companies, weapons manufacturers, military vehicle manufacturers and other giants who profit from wars. Once government control becomes complete (of course only God has truly perfect and ultimate control), it would become a dictatorship, and the constitution could be scrapped.

4) Consider also that Homeland Security was recently given millions of new bullets.

Related Article:

Why the GOP Is Scared of Ron Paul and 4 Reasons He Might Still Get the 2012 Republican Nomination

A Prediction – What May Happen After WW3

September 21, 2012 Leave a comment

If Israel fires a nuke over Iran, and specifically targets them for an EMP attack (rather than directly killing anyone and being seen as mass murderers for at least years). And suppose they do so to Saudi Arabian and Jordan just to be on the safe side, and protect themselves from revenge attacks, this would surely start WW3 as it would be seen as a major economic attack affecting all countries’ economies negatively, including the US. This then would trigger at least other EMP attacks throughout the world and nations that wouldn’t be affected much by it due to being poor, would probably face major food and ammunition shortages due to the shortage on oil (due to the electronics needed to distribute the oil worldwide in mass, being destroyed) needed for transportation of those things. And that in turn would cause the poor for sure, to start trying to steal from their neighbors for a while. That in turn would eventually lead to inter-town and city battles, perhaps even state and country battles over food and ammo and other resources to help the survivors live comfortable lives during such a horrible time. And if things get really bad because of such worldwide conflicts, food would become even scarcer. That would be due to farmers fleeing in fear for their lives when their farms or ranches are raided by everyone and their seeds perhaps even taken. Afterwards, people might start resorting to murder for food (cannibalism I mean) everywhere, after having first eaten their pets if any, hopefully, before resorting to such a horrible thing.

There would be some countries with a large amount of intact electronics though I think, mainly in Africa and South America. I believe that after or during the cannibalism stage, or just when it started, a clever man, a psychopathic narcissist would appear to take advantage of everyone’s desperation, the anti-Christ. Most likely seeing what is happening now, he’s already plotting as to how to take advantage of the world, moving his chess pieces into place, securing other partners in crime (and even planning on taking advantage of them too and backstabbing them in his justified paranoia).

I imagine he’s at leat a multi-millionaire, if not billionaire, or perhaps the spoiled son of one, and has stored away an enormous amount of fuel, food, weapons, military gear, horses and electronics to use for a world wide presidential campaign so to speak, with a well armed secret service. I imagine he’s secured friends, through bribery, promises of power and/or sexual favors of some sort, in countries not likely to be struck by EMP weapons, friends who will come to help him during his run for emperor of the world. After dispatching messengers throughout all the major cities, and acquiring followers for himself, through food handouts more lies, he’ll then have his followers resort to pillaging anyone who won’t follow him, and murdering them for food for others, as in more cannibalism. The envoys will use scare tactics, and a clever and conniving way to pressure everyone else to fall in line: take our masters mark on your forehead or hand where everyone can see it, or you won’t get our help, and no one will be able to buy or sell from those getting our help.

The millions of true Christians of course will realize what is going on, and will reject these envoys of doom, realizing they are the anti-Christ’s henchman though not yet knowing what this anti-Christ looks like. When the envoys realize the Christians are a “problem”, they will become hostile towards them and use them as a scapegoat and punching bag of convenience for the problems everyone is facing and an “easy” (so they think) source of plunder. like the Jews were in Hitler’s time and onward to today.

Some of these Christians will probably become farm and sex slaves and food fodder for the world. the Jews of of Hitler’s time. Even now most of the world scapegoats the Christians. Too bad they don’t do so with Christ and be saved (Christians who know the Bible well enough to know the Biblical term “scapegoat” know what I mean by that).

The prophecy Jesus made about the world being worse than it was then (just) before the Flood of Noah already came true, the world has gotten worse, mainly, because God’s word is available to all, and clear enough in various pages (and even if not, there are plenty of Christians and informational sources that most people can get access to through someone who has a car and computer) that anyone can find out it is his word. There are libraries everywhere. A Muslim could even trick one of his leaders by saying, “Bring me a Bible so I can show everyone how false it is” or secretly got o some Christian community for one, if he wants to check for himself if it could possibly be God’s word. The Quran itself says the Bible is God’s word, yet many Muslims won’t even listen to that, their own “holy book” from the man Mohammed they worship and whom some will murder over in their passion for him and pride. Instead they make up some easy excuse without evidence, like, “The Bible’s been tampered with so now we can’t believe it” or “Our God did away with it, said it was not as good as the Quran.” And though knowing God’s word is here on Earth, and having a good example of the Baptists and Presbyterians (the non-liberal ones) for them to follow, Christians all over the world, and though not being rich being charitable even to Muslims and other enemies of Christ, the world still refuses to heed Christ, even though knowing his greatest law: “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” So jealous are they as were the ancient Greek philosophers of Moses, that they will only refer to Christ now and then, as a good man or spiritual master, but more rare will they mention the good things he said and did. And when they do, they use them as tickets for a continued life of sin, a passport for evil. They’ll take him out of context and say, “Don’t judge.” (there should be no period after that, despite the translators of the Bible putting one there) or the other famous line, “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” And though people who say that are enemies of Christ, of the true Christians, they won’t even repeat, “Love your enemies” or “forgive your enemies” or “bless those who curse you”, because such words cut them to the heart too much, and are much harder to conceal of the meaning of. “Judge” is confused by Christian haters as meaning, “condemn” or “say we’re wrong”, though Jesus by “judge” in the “Don’t judge” passage, meant “make a moral determination about whether someone is doing right or not” (he also separated that from “condemn” mentioning that right after). So, there is a layer of confusion to figuring out what it means to judge. Those who repeat it don’t necessarily know they are saying something in a vague way or confusing way that often delays them being easily or quickly judged again, it’s due to their own confusion of the word. If they knew what Jesus meant, then they’d realize they were being hypocritical being that they are doing the very same thing by merely saying, “Don’t judge” to anyone. However, if they were to say, “You should just forgive and love your enemies like Jesus said to”, what confusion over that would there be? They’d realize in their hateful response (even though saying a good thing like that) that they are not forgiving and loving the Christian who judged them for whatever, the Christian they consider an enemy. They think they are okay as long as they say, “Don’t judge” because perhaps it is true, they don’t say, “Oh you Christians are wrong” (though hypocritically often many liberals will say fundamentalist Christians are conservatives and will say or imply that they steal, murder by war or poisoning the environment, and covet (are jealous of what they have). I think also they don’t use that line because they are simply very ignorant of the Bible, have forgotten what it teaches if they ever learned that part, and don’t want to remember and deliberately forget. So the most they do in response to a Christian word-wise when trying to use the Bible directly against them is, “Don’t judge.” Other common responses are: “Hypocrite,” “You’re ranting,” “You shouldn’t condemn,” “troll,” “go away,” “you’re crazy,” “you’re stupid,” “you’re obsessed,” “you’re a fanatic,” “you’re ignorant,” “God forbid someone else have an opinion (which is a conniving weasel tactic meant no one can have factual things to say except that Christianity is false and Christians are bad), “I have my way you have yours,” and absurd, arrogant, hypocritical and common, “Don’t shove your religion down my throat.” All of which are usually ended by a period, because they are mere insults and cheap shots meant to shield their minds from guilt or fear of God. Those insults also all apply to them.

My suggestion, learn wilderness survival skills, and buy some tent or tents and survival equipment and most important of all, learn how to get saved. If you want live forever, read this

Mat 7:15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.
Mat 7:16 You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?
Mat 7:17 So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit.
Mat 7:18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.
Mat 7:21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’
Mat 7:23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’
Mat 7:24 “Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock.
Mat 7:25 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock.
Mat 7:26 And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand.
Mat 7:27 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.”
Mat 7:28 And when Jesus finished these sayings, the crowds were astonished at his teaching,
Mat 7:29 for he was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.

Denise Siegal – Fraud Psychic

September 21, 2012 Leave a comment

I’m listening to Coast to Coast AM right, now, to Denise Siegal, a supposed skeptical psychic and an astrology. She confuses prophecy with being psychic. That says a lot about her level of knowledge, no offense. And afterwards, George Noory, a moron, just caught her on what he thought was her contradicting herself it seemed to me, when she said she thought and felt we’re on the verge of WW3 (that’s not a prediction if you hadn’t noticed), although it wasn’t because you can do both. AND UGH: WHO IN THEE HELL NEEDS TO BE PSYCHIC TO THINK OR FEEL WE ARE?! What a stereotypical fraud psychic. Then George said after some other exchanges: “I don’t care about your opinions,” as if to be funny or rather meaning, “I only want your predictions.” After some other words she said that she FELT again that there’d be another world war sometime in the next THIRTY YEARS. WOW, AGAIN, STEREOTYPICAL VAGUE “PSYCHIC”: GIVE A BROAD AMOUNT OF TIME FOR YOURSELF TO BE RIGHT OR WRONG. What a joke. And incredible that a person like this gets a long line of comments on her about me page while someone like me, who actually teaches logic and truth, and gives evidence for what I say, clear evidence, is ignored. She doesn’t even show a picture of herself on her about me page or homepage (maybe because she knows it would be a bad idea if she wanted to get a real job, if her face became well known for for her scam). It’s shameful that liberals cheer each other on while Christians, the true ones, are usually silent.

A Stupid Business: Why Not To Invest In Microsoft

September 20, 2012 2 comments

So, I’m trying to log into msn messenger two days ago, aka the dumbly named “Windows Live”, and when I realize I’m not sure about the password, I try to go look for some software to unveil the hidden password, and when I move my mouse I accidentally select “forget me” or whatever it says while logged out, do I get a “are you sure?” No, instead it wipes the email and password instantly. Awesome, not. So then I go to my online email account using IE, and unlike the usual for hotmail, I’m still logged in. YET, when I go to change my password since none of them were working to get into msn messenger, and instead of going through some simple no brainer steps, I get instead some other page that says, “since dis is sensitive info u must do such and such” as in PUT IN YOUR PASSWORD TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD. DUMB. So then of course I try their steps to fill out the info I put in when signing up. But since I don’t use live email much, because gmail is superior, and because I don’t use msn messenger and I barely use it cuz they won’t get rid of that dumb big fat obese advertising/home page thing on it, I can’t remember the details either. It did however ask who the last person I sent an email out to was, so I put that in. But what happens two days later, do I get a, “Oh, so this is your email account, and this is a recently sent out email, and you did give the correct birthday, so here’s a password reset link.” No, instead:

We recently received a request to recover your account Microsoft account Unfortunately, we were unable to verify your ownership of this account using the information you provided. Microsoft takes the security and privacy of our customers very seriously, and our commitment to protecting your personal information requires that we take the utmost care in ensuring that you are the account owner.

Please submit a new account verification form
At this point, your best option is to submit a new form with as much accurate information as you can gather. The more information you can include in the form, the better the chance you’ll have of regaining access to your account. We’ve included a few tips below to help you fill out the form as completely and accurately as possible.

> Submit a new form

Helpful tips for filling out another form:

  • Answer as many questions as you can.
  • Use the information you provided when you created the account, or last updated it.
  • Submit the form from a computer you frequently use.
  • You will be asked to list recently used email addresses and the subject lines from recent emails. Ask for help from family members, friends, or business contacts to confirm their email addresses and tell you the subject lines of the last three emails they sent you.
  • Make sure to use the correct domain for your account, such as,, or Keep in mind that your email address may be country specific. For example, if you created your account in Sweden, your domain would be “” rather than “”.


     > Submit a new form

Thank you,

Microsoft Support Team

Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052

Account recovery request 56270412 is now closed. Please do not reply to this message. Replies to this message are routed to an unmonitored mailbox.


Here’s my idea: If I’m logged in, and can change things like my profile, how about let me be able to contact a customer service person, just as easily as allows it, and show I’m logged in and would like my password changed? Why are these rich moron CEOs so utterly dumb and out of touch? Or is it they want money? Because I noticed at the bottom of the recovery form was something about entering your billing information. Rich people are shit aren’t they? I hope if Obama is reelected that he taxes them to death. I definitely won’t be giving Microsoft my money for their email service with massive stupidity like that. How can it help their business to make life oppressive for their users? And what’s with Yahoo email? Why do they make it impossible to connect it to an email client like Thunderbird, unless I guess, you pay them. I’ll still with Gmail, which doesn’t give me as hard a time as those two dumb companies.

Why the Feds (Homeland Security) Bought Massive Amounts of Ammo

September 20, 2012 3 comments

They are prepping for:

A national or world wide cataclysm: solar flares, sudden worldwide earthquakes or an “unlucky” event in which a mix of major and minor disasters all happen to the nation at once, which might set off an economic collapse and an ongoing surge of riot-looting, and even groups which specifically form for the purpose of looting and anti-government attacks, which they may, in their stereotyping of Christians, fear will come due to their belief that God is with them and would have them get rid of the government during such a time when it would be vulnerable to a more successful overthrow. They may fear that these potential rebel Christians would quickly gain followers, who though not agreeing with their Christian or quasi Christian beliefs, would join them just to have a chance at forming their own type of government, somewhere in America. They may also fear that foreign provocateurs/infiltrators/plants from Russia, China, Venezuela or Cuba would use such situations to foment a successful overthrow and/or to pressure America into falling in line more with/becoming passive to their policies in the name of world peace and prosperity (something the anti-Christ would try to do the Bible implies, so that he could more easily take advantage of them) . A false messiah or messiahs also might try to take advantage of disasters or overthrow events that result from them. Drug lords may also join in or be hired by foreign enemies to help in an overthrow attempt. They might get Mexico and Venezuela to help take over New Mexico, Arizona, California and the lower half of Texas.

And since the world may see that Obama hates America and wants to diminish America’s power to make the world more equal, these things may especially happen if he wins his run for the presidency again. The CIA and military-industrial complex may go along with Obama in hopes to draw out all the most willing enemies of the country to crush them, for self centered or not reasons, perhaps they are hoping to gain new technology through a new world war like they did when they defeated Germany and are hoping Mexico will come up with some revolutionary tech in the fight, or perhaps that some Americans will, perhaps they are hoping Venezuela will join in, to make the spoils greater).

The feds and liberal state governments may also try to pull off something evil during a war against foreigners, like enslave all Christians who refuse to participate, or force them to fight to defend them or hope that while everyone is distracted by the foreign attacks, send out death squads to eliminate districts who oppose liberalism.

The feds may also be preparing to fend off China and Russia and possible Muslim allies from Jordan and Saudi Arabia who would help Russia and China if they thought that the US was going to stop buying mideast oil. Such forces would surely attempt to take over the White House and Pentagon.

Such forces may even have EMPs prepared to use as a surprise attack, especially if they think they are on the verge of losing their take-over attempt.

They may also be buying such large amounts, in addition to those reasons, if some fear an alien invasion, and because in a economic collapse, the price of ammo would become higher, and the government is already in bad economic condition. One more reason may be to send money into ammo companies in hopes that those companies will show liberals favor in the future, and that includes Obama at the election polls, and side with the liberals in any overthrow attempts, as in sell to them only, and reveal to them any of their enemies attempting to buy ammo from them. There are no other logical reasons for buying such large amounts of ammo, except insanity.

God: There shall be one law for the native and for the stranger who sojourns among you

September 19, 2012 Leave a comment

A new fallacy for you: The Freedom of Religion Fallacy (or Freedom of Way of Life Fallacy)

It occurred to me a few minutes ago while reading some CNN story about the Muslim violence supposedly over the Innocence of Muslims video, a story about a French newspaper making a cartoon over Mohammed that might cause more violence, why God required that foreigners in his land Israel obey the his laws when moving there. Truly this liberal (anti-Christian) “be whatever religion” you want hypocrisy is more logical fallacy equality nonsense. And yep: it goes against conservatism too. Do you get what I mean? Satan blinds a lot of you pretty bad, so I’ll explain: if someone’s religion opposes the law of God (or any thing they do), like “Don’t murder” or “Don’t steal” (hear this gypsies) it causes trouble of some kind, and can lead to physical harm and death. That is why if all countries simply obeyed God there would be no trouble. Yet by trying to use liberal (anti-Christian) philosophy or the conservatist’s “freedom of religion” one, you end up, logically, with conflict. Hence Muslims and gypsies any everyone else committing crimes to no end because they believe THEIR religion, their commands, what they feel like doing trumps God’s commands. So you get: adultery, murder, rebellion against parents, theft, drunken idiocy, fights between neighbors, mobs, riots and on and on. Read how to get eternal life at my journal at if you want to help break this cycle of endless violence against God.

As Jesus said, you can’t have two masters, you must hate one and obey the other, so to with God, you can’t have yourself as an equal to God, or “Lie when you think it’s best” and “Don’t lie” as equal laws.

Wow: Many amazing experiences in the past 3 days

September 12, 2012 Leave a comment

[6:55 PM: Note: I blamed the post office yesterday for me badly injuring a finger, it may only be partially their fault]. So, yesterday, as I mentioned on twitter, I found a sinkhole. I kept digging into it hoping to break into a spring or find beautiful minerals inside. The rain eventually stopped, which was a good thing, because I was being stubborn and not washing out dirt that got into my eyes like I should have. While in the pool I discovered a pretty large green bodied orange-brown headed centipede under a nearby rock outside the pool. Not sure why I lifted it up. And I also found two pill bugs, which seem to me to live in the desert, since they had a unique powder pink blue appearance unlike the kinds that live in areas where it rains much more often. I could feel what I figured is salt crystal under the hole, or whatever it is, but those things usually are too hard to remove without first breaking them apart, which when wet, takes a lot of strength. I could only take a few small chunks out that seemed to have formed that way, and there was just too much mud, and me in too much pain from shredded cuticles and sand in my eyes and too exhausted to wash them off. Then, being stubborn still, foolish, I went wandering again looking for more rocks, and did find some more. Then I met a close acquaintance, a hermaphrodite (who claims her parents removed her male part) Katie, whose cigarette smoke I smelled far away, and thinking it might be from some homeless people nearby at first. But then I saw her by the edge of a cliff, and she wanted me to look at a coyote down below, and hoped to find some coyote pups. She begged me to go with her though I told her about the sand in my eyes. I saw she had a beautiful necklace on and she told me her grandmother gave it to her. It was some sort of carved mineral, of colors I wish I could find but haven’t yet. I’ve never seen anything that looked like it actually. I noticed where she was standing was a beautiful green rock embedded in the cliff, though not like the one on her neck. It was visible because of the rain, and I knew that if it dried out I might never see it again (and indeed even today can’t find it, though I plan on getting a jug of water to see if I can cause it to stand out again and then smash it out).

I decided to go with her, and to my amazement, and as I had thought would happen due to the rain, found many beautiful rocks below and on the sides of the cliff, however there were so many and many of them larger than my first, that I had to put them all down and put them in piles and still even this morning haven’t gotten to them yet. I even have a bag of rocks from yesterday that I gathered before it rained and just at the beginning that is still out on one part of the cliff. And she even found some herself. One of the rocks was particular striking, a larger than fist sized nearly rectangular chunk of layered rock, which I think was agate. There was one by it that was stuck in the ground and I didn’t bring my shovel with me, so I had to leave it. We went down below again (we first had gone down then up again on another part of the cliff looking into the bottom of another part of the cliff where plants were thick) and into the plants. I warned her that it was dangerous because of the thorns (I had been down there a few times before) but she went anyways and to my amazement saw there was beautiful moss in various places mixed with beautiful lichens, at least beautiful because of the rain having washed and soaked them. And for the first time noticed a huge beautiful boulder somewhat in the middle, which would make a nice place to sit and take a picture. I tried to take a chunk of moss and other stuff with it with me but it broke apart as I was showing it to her.

We didn’t find any coyotes, but it was fun, and the pain in my eyes wasn’t so bad UNTIL I WENT HOME AND WASHED THEM OUT. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!!!!! That always hurts so bad and I don’t know why. It feels like my eyes on the bottom are drying out and dry rough sand rubbing against my eye balls and the inside of my eye lids. Ugh it burns SO BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My left eye, which had it worse, was still in pain a little even this morning, enough to make me hate life. Katie said she’d be out at 8, but my back was in too much pain and I was too tired and so on. But then at around 6 in the morning, not sure, I went out again, found more beautiful rocks and then noticed a certain type of mineral sticking out from above the surface, and it delighting my eyes I dug it out. I kept digging more of that type out until I discovered that below was a fissure, and it smelled bad and a wave of heat came out of it and was still venting heat for a few minutes more even though it had been open for a while. I eventually managed to dig out enough dirt, and break enough rock out from it that I saw the fissure went deep underground and UNDER the hard salt and hard mud-like rock crust that is below the sand and rocks above. While digging and not yet seeing that the fissure was going apparently FAR under the salt, an amazing thing happened (besides continually finding beautiful salt-chunk formations, some of which sparkled beautifully, especially one chunk that had formed a crust around a small rock which I removed off the rock and which looked like sparkling rootbeer on some parts): s large road runner walked near to me, higher up on the cliff, no more than six feet away from me, and stood there, observing me as I dog. My head was well above the hole, so it was strange that it did that, and wasn’t afraid. I even slowed down a little and made some bird-like sounds and it sort of tilted its head, and its left eye dialated wide, and then it went on its way, not even afraid and going in short bursts of walking. If only I had had a camcorder with me. It was a beautiful sight. About 30 mins after that is when I finally was able to see the fissure went every deep. I then got out, surrounded by too many beautiful salt rocks to take home (only took a few samples of various rocks to see how they would look under black light, and need to charge my batteries still as they died out during the digging). I then wandered again for a few minutes, finding more beautiful rocks, and observe the sink hole again. I saw some black ants in it and walking on the sides of the inside of it. I don’t know why it interested them. It seems as desert ants they wouldn’t want to get wet, like scorpions and camel spiders don’t want to, but they didn’t mind. They were even out in the rain, acting like idiots and walking on the mud perimeter of the pool I had made.

After observing the sinkhole again (or whatever it is) I then finally made it back home, dirty and miserable as usual.

Wow I ended that last sentence at about 11:22 AM, I had to sleep, and finally got back to this at 5:22 PM.

If I had something else to say, I’ve forgotten. Praise God for the fun, he made all my great experiences possible, and may God bless Ellena the super beauty.

11:43 AM Sept. 13, 2012:

No thanks to the stupid USPS I punctured my left finger badly with my chisel USING A SLEDGE HAMMER. If those stupid morons had gotten my thorn proof gloves to me and not falsely claimed they were delivered that never would have happened most likely. How will they pay me back for such an injury? Untrustworthy government morons! Ugh! But despite that, I made a major clean up of the top front of a cliff. Removing huge amounts of rock and debris and beautifying it. Of course the richies living across from me who see that often won’t pay me for improving their view, right? Regardless, I found thousands of dollars or minerals and recovered at least a hundred $’s worth. I had to leave some behind because there was too much, I had sand in my left eye again, was dehydrated, exhausted from using mainly one arm and one piece was huge, worth about $900 in my opinion due to its beauty, size, rarity and risking my face to get it. An interesting thing happened while cleaning up and finding rocks near that fissure: the same road runner seemed to have returned, and climbed up the cliff all the way to the top of the mesa, and it was about 8 feet away, but didn’t seem interested in me this time. I climbed up to observe it and it was apparently looking for food, and I got a decent look at it from about 12 feet away, and saw red near its eye, as if it were injured, but not sure if that was feather coloration. It had no interest in me this time. Some little birds also flew into a tree to observe me for a while as I sat for a while after clearing out a lot of debris. I also saw a cotton tail at the bottom to the right of the cliff, apparently looking for food, and not concerned about me, till I lost sight of it and tried to throw rocks near it to see where it went, at which point it ran a short distance and hid. I think I found something like a wolf spider too. I put it in a bottle in the shade. I saw two other types of uninteresting spiders. No pill bugs seen this time despite me clearing out a lot of moist brown dirt with a few tiny plants growing around. Strangely, I saw no humming birds, and haven’t for at least a week. It’s odd since usually I see them in the areas where there are many thorny trees, and there were many below.

Time to rest and eat.

6:57 PM: Angry and disgusted: I went to the apartment office again to see if the gloves would be found, this time it was a different sales girl. She found the package in about 9 seconds, as opposed to the other two. Of the two one was new, so I am not mad at her, but the other said she double checked and then locked me out. I also didn’t find any slip in my mailbox, though didn’t look under the junk ads I left inside, so, not sure, and don’t have my mailbox key so it’s inconvenient to try and check. But wow, a punctured finger over two girls double checking supposedly and when that box of heavy duty gloves had been there for at least five days now and they surely would have seen it before while looking for the mail of others. I better get $100 off otherwise it’s negative review time, and an overdue one. I did find more rocks though in the past 25 mins, one was very good, so, I’m not as mad as I otherwise would have been had I not found them, and I still have about 10 spots where I gathered many of them to collect. One of my neighbors said that they wouldn’t give me any discount off my rent for this cuz I could have just waited till I got the gloves, however, I did wait, and it was there for five days and they “double checked”. And it’s ridiculous that I should have to put off my work for days for their error, as ridiculous as me asking them to cease their work over some mistake of mine and not paying them back when they lose money or are injured because of my lack of concern causing a bad mistake. 7:13 PM: Forgot to mention Amazon gave me a refund because I said the item was never delivered, that makes a fool of me and Amazon. Those two girls dishonored the postal service too, even if their mail man didn’t leave the slip. Oh yeah, there is a sweet fat old dog named Charlie who goes out into the desert to greet me all the time he goes out. He’s very loving, makes me feel good, but sad at the same time being that I know of no one that loving to me. But it also at the same time makes me feel sad, knowing that there are dogs that are better than most humans, many animals that are, it’s a very, very sad thing. Shouldn’t it be that the more intelligent should be the most loving? It’s true what the Bible says: the more you learn the more arrogant you become.

I sometimes, while out in the desert, think about how stupid the homeless are who live out there. They get drunk and spend their time being bitter and angry, living off food stamps (and much better than me since it’s a struggle for me to cook in a rock and dust filled apartment. And though seeing me over 9 months gathering rock after rock, rather than having the wisdom to join it, remain the same and they live right next to these rocks unlike my neighbors. And how stupid of my neighbors to see the same thing, and never to bring me water, except old John, not native born to America, who did so once and gave me some candy a few times, and never to befriend me so they don’t feel guilty joining in, and Katie who got me drunk.

The best things in my life: Christ, Danica, Charlie and rocks. No offense to everyone else.

Why Buddhism Is A Logical Fallacy and Has The Dalai Lama Changed Since He Was Ostracized by the Chinese Government?

September 1, 2012 2 comments

Why Buddhism Is A Logical Fallacy, and Has The Dalai Lama Changed Since He Was Ostracized by the Chinese Government?

I wrote this due to the promotion of the idea by many that everyone should promote Tibet being free and that no country should be taken over by another, just because. It’s usually I find associated with atheism, whose individuals necessarily have “Because I feel this is true” morality, i.e. “just cause” morality.

There is a great irony in the DL’s ostracization of deity worship, his ostracization of the Shugdans: by opposing China’s rule, nonsensically, being that China allows Buddhism, and favors it over Christianity, he’s opposing atheism and so being self-defeating. He opposes Shugdan he claims because it’s spirit worship, not demon worship, not worship of an imaginary god, but simply because it’s not atheist Buddhism, and because it prevented him, PHILOSOPHICALLY, from being able to learn what he felt, as in, because his teacher was reluctant for him to study something other than Shugdanism he said that it wasn’t for him, does that sound rational? If an atheist says to me, “Be extremely careful about studying Christianity, for you may end up one of them, especially be weary of fundamentalism, and the worst, creationism,” should that mere reason alone be a reason to reject atheism and believe in theism, God or Christianity? He also claimed it was to unite the Buddhists. Because? To get them to lose their lives casting China off? Consider that mentality: I would have some of you die so that we can return to not just being a country on our own again, but unified atheist Buddhists, because you can learn about all the versions of Buddhism as one. He doesn’t even say, “Because theism is illogical, there are no spirits,” it’s just for the sake of unity and/or to put off China. What for? Buddhism is about nationalism?! Buddhism is about unity with Buddhist traditions? No. According to at least modern Buddhism, which the DL subscribes to fully: all ways lead to the truth, except the usual line from cults, which is that any religion that says ours is false doesn’t lead to truth, however Buddhists show their religion is false because they arbitrary approve of religions they don’t even know and don’t say “religions that rejects ours”, a sign of a cult, one that operates on the arbitrary arrogance of its leader rather than logic. According to one Buddhist, truth is reached by self-effort alone, so who cares about unity? It’s a contradiction. This too is a contradiction: the DL’s opposition to what he claims to be for: traditional Buddhism, which is this: nothing is lost, everything just changes, and whatever happens is due to karma. So then, if Tibet no longer exists as a nation, then that was simply part of the law of material change, and they were getting what they deserved. So it’s futile for the DL or anyone who supports him to CARE that change has occurred, especially when Buddha supposedly said, “The Buddha said, “No one can escape death and unhappiness. If people expect only happiness in life, they will be disappointed.” And what his solution? To stop desiring anything, which due to his ignorance, lead to another contradiction: if you don’t desire anything, you then shouldn’t desire to end suffering either, you would become like a heartless robot, something with zero motivation for its actions, something with no curiosity or lust or love or anger.

There are other problems with Buddhism I’ve mentioned earlier, which you can learn about through the Buddhism category I linked to.

For those who have studied narcissism disorder and religion/who are theologians, but not Buddhism in depth, if you read a large portion of Buddha’s supposed sayings, his self-affirmations (literal self-affirmations that would only apply to him, not others despite how they sound or what his followers give the impression of), you’ll find that they are the sayings of someone with narcissism disorder and all narcissists are insincere and despite their words, they act with, in general, a cold attitude towards those they give their smaller than a grain of mustard seed and hypocritical self-serving kindness too. That is why, despite the beautiful appearance Buddhism had and the peaceful demeanor the DL has, that Buddhism overall has a negative effect on those who practice it, a stagnating effect. The stagnation is due to giving priority of all you learn being directed by the limited teachings of the cult leader (especially limited if that person is a narcissist or one of his top leaders is or one directly above you is), and especially if you’re trying to memorize the sayings of Buddha and what you feel he taught or what some Buddhist teacher repeating what he said plus the usual claims of what they claim he did and also from doing the Buddhist practice of endlessly blanking your mind afterwards or simply focusing on those teachings, to achieve peace. Is stagnation good? No. Stagnation implies not going further along in truth, and according to Buddha even, one of the mistakes people make that prevents them from reaching “the truth” is to stop walking in it, to not go through with it. But what he meant by truth, who knows, since he himself was a liar. But the truth that matters, is the truth God says matters: who God is, what right and wrong truly are, and worshiping him with a morally clean heart, and one with a sincere love for him. How can you know what is truly right from wrong? Is it by worshiping the Pope, or the Dalai Lama, or believing in Catholic traditions because the Pope or your Catholic teacher told you to, or certain Buddhist traditions because the Dalai Lama said so, or memorizing the Book of Mormon because Joseph Smith said that it’s the most correct book of any other (and what happened to God having a perfect word and being able to say what is fully true and not being a liar, Mormons?)? No, you can learn it by believing who God is (the God who gave the ten commandments and who said, “Do to others as you would have them do to you” and “The Lord your God is One, and you shall love him with all your heart and with all your mind and with all your soul and with all your spirit and with all your strength” and, as someone who is far from obedient to those laws, you will only learn the truth so far as you properly fear him, because he truly can, unlike karma, give you what you deserve, pain or pleasure, uncontentment or peace.

Furthermore, the Dalai Lama, thee supposed master of religion, the highest you can get, doesn’t even know what religion is. He claims Dorje Shugdan isn’t a religion. Religion is a way of life that centers around the worship of something. And usually the religion has a method to it, some tradition. Do Shugdans have any method to their worship or traditions? Do they have their own morality? Or are they of the disorganized liberal group who reject “organized religion” and walk into trees and pray with a tomato on their head and roll around in the dirt babbling random things and worshiping whatever for the moment for their religion? If that were the case then okay, it’s not a religion, it’s insanity, but if the opposite, then the Dalai Lama is confused, lying and being a hypocritical leader and teacher.

One more thing to consider for rejecting Buddhism: did Buddha say that truth can’t change? Or did he truly mean that all things change? Because if he meant that truth also changes, they he broke a law of logic (which, unlike physical laws/physics laws/laws of nature) is permanent, that is he broke the law of Truth aka Absolute Truth, which is that truth can never become a lie and a lie can never become a truth. And don’t think that you can make a thing either by simply doing something, like if someone says you didn’t murder someone and then you go out and murder to make it true, no that’s not breaking or showing that law false, because that doesn’t change that it was a lie at the time and still is since it can’t be undone at that time. It would be like someone murdering someone and then you bring that person back to life after they were dead and saying, “See he didn’t murder anyone.” Yes he did, he just was brought back to life afterwards, so the sin remains. Anyone who teaches against that law therefore is absolutely a liar.