Archive for September, 2012

Liberal Bullying — YouTube (and CNN) Censor Free Speech and Christians

September 30, 2012 2 comments

A few days ago, I noticed some extremely harsh atheist trolls raving over me and another Christian posting rebuttals to a claim on a video in which a naturist claimed evolution was true. I first saw whiny complaints by a few atheists on YouTube doing the usual: whining about seeing comments about God, and demanding and commanding those mentioning him to not mention him, and one atheist used a typical immature cliche, saying to “get your ass back to church” and talk about God there. There were various insults as always, but none from the Christian, till I came in to rebuke them for their stupidity and trying to take God’s place and them preaching their own version of morality, that being to not talk about God or religion whenever it didn’t meet their approval. These are typical liberal morons who like the liberals that call to conservative radio shows, or who hear them, complain about them, as if they are forced to listen.

A very short while after, I got this email:

The YouTube Community has flagged one or more of your videos as inappropriate. Once a video is flagged, it is reviewed by the YouTube Team against our Community Guidelines. Upon review, we have determined that the following video(s) contain content in violation of these guidelines, and have been disabled:

Bombardier Beetle vs Solpugid aka Camel spider aka Sun spider aka Wind scorpion –

Your account has received one Community Guidelines warning strike, which will expire in six months. Additional violations may result in the temporary disabling of your ability to post content to YouTube and/or the permanent termination of your account.

For more information on YouTube’s Community Guidelines and how they are enforced, please visit the help center.

The YouTube Team

After reading the comment I tried to post on someone elses video who had complained about the same thing happening to him, but noticed I couldn’t post a comment. I wasted about 10 minutes trying! Then I clicked my account only to get a warning message saying blah blah you did such and such wrong and making me acknowledge I read it. I then was able to go back to posting comments. But was there any appeal button? No, instead, these morons force you to use Google to figure out how to appeal the accusation or naturally have you search their help section. When I searched through their help section, I tried to complain about harassment, which was true, however it wouldn’t work with Firefox 14, and was getting a message in broken English, to select something, yet I had selected “something”. There was nothing left to fill out. I then tried to start over only for it to be stuck with the harassment button being selected, and unable to break out of it and continue the process of the complaint. SO THEN, I opened up Internet Explorer and this time decided to go read everything else that applied to my situation, only to go around TWICE IN A CIRCLE, as there was no genuine method of CONTACTING THEM AS THEIR SITE CLAIMED COULD BE DONE. ANOTHER TEN MINUTES OF MY LIFE DOWN THEIR TOILET OF CONTEMPT FOR THEIR CUSTOMERS.

I then Googled how to appeal a video being removed and saw on top a YouTube video from a user, not a YouTube “team member” that pointed me to YouTube’s official (and pathetic and obviously ignored) blog on . I then, as others had done, left my complaint, AND TRIED ABOUT SIX TIMES TO DO SO, TRIED SIX TIMES BECAUSE EACH TIME THE CAPTCHA ENTRY WAS REJECTED! MORE OF MY LIFE DOWN THE DRAIN. The reason it was failing is because the captchas were using tiny numbers in blocks, which were so blurry or small that I thought it was just part of the mess meant to fool spam bots. Finally I got a comment through, so I thought. I then saw it had to be approved by the moderator. I then looked carefully at the comments left, and noticed that some of the comments that were approved were clearly junk comments, not even serious, just nonsense. Now here was a great lie YouTube made, because in its help section, or that blog, they claimed they really did have moderators evaluating flagged videos 24 hours a day. Now if these moderators are doing that, if they are competent, why did they approve comments not related to that page on flagged videos and why did they reject my appeal!?:

Thank you for submitting your video appeal to YouTube.

After further review of the content, we’ve determined that your video does violate our Community Guidelines and have upheld our original decision. We appreciate your understanding.


— The YouTube Team”

Can anyone explain how my video is a violation, when nothing was harmed, yet approves of insects being put together in a tight space for the purpose of seeing which will kill each other first, and as the spectators clearly hope to see, in some amazing way or why they approve of animals being eaten alive, or a kitten being used as a machine gun? I can go on, and on, and on, and on, including asking why they approve of little girls dancing in sexual ways, little as in three to eleven years old and a baby being attacked by a cobra a boy drowning a pet snake. Everyone has seen certain ones. Consider also this: that video, mine, which they banned, had under 1,500 views, yet the videos I’ve mentioned have millions of views, with the exception of the machine gun cat video having over about 320,000 views. How about the Man Vs Wild series: is it necessary for Bear Grylls to rip the tentacles off a living octopus, cut the tail ends off scorpions without first killing it, and on, and on, and on, rather than eat animals killed quickly like everyone else? Does anyone think that an octopus with its large brain felt any pain having its tentacles being ripped off? Can anyone say YouTube’s moderators are “anti-Christian sickos”? Obviously they are.

How can liberals and atheists expect to be seen as the most peaceful and rational among all the humans if they are conniving psychopaths and bullies who can’t tolerate disagreement or seeing God being put in a good light, or even a comment that expressed a mere disbelief in evolution theory, a theory for which there is NO EVIDENCE, but rather, a huge amount of evidence against, as my Twitter feed and journal thoroughly documents, as can easily be learned from a few hours of research, or even thought experiments? Did it ever occur to anyone that extremely small bacteria can’t just know what and how to eat without having been deliberately programmed? And even the smallest bacteria aren’t just “simple”, it’s not like you can make one for a few dollars or even with a $1,000,000, you’d need millions to make synthetic bacteria even with America and Japan’s state of the art technology, and you’d still need to use parts that came from a living one just to make a synthetic one. How can baby animals be born knowing how to breath, how to instantly walk, how did such sophisticated programming come about, where did the laws come from that allowed for that? Are the laws of this universe simple? Unlike math, which can’t be engineered, for example 2+2 simply = 4, there is nothing you can do to change that, it is an eternal truth, unlike math, the physics laws of this universe are variable, in that atoms, electrons, particles and dimensions can be changed, if you had God’s powers, so why are the laws of this universe the way they are, and not some other way? Again, it’s not like math truths, because truths can’t be changed no matter what. You could come up with a new math problem, but nothing will change about what the answer will be.

Obvious conclusion: YouTube/Google Corporation is a violation of logic and common sense, it approves of bullying Christians whom it thinks no one will notice being picked on, and is composed of moderators that are no better than the trolls cyberbullying, stalking and harassing other users in various ways. And now YouTube too makes it on the list of my Cyberstalking Hall of Shame, the entire corporation. I have also begun a boycott of YouTube.

Update: I just found out, at about 6:25 AM, that CNN had blocked me, when I went to read the comments about Syria’s president supposedly going to demolish Syrian homes in Hama, I didn’t even intend to say anything. I noticed before reading any, this comment with a beige background: “This site has blocked you from making comments.” I hadn’t made comments for a long time there except for some recent ones, which were about that girl who was elected as a prank as home coming queen. What oh so offensive things did I say that violated the (liberal) Community Guidelines? This: “Stand up for what you believe in and go with your heart and go with your gut. That’s what I did, and look at me now. I’m just as happy as can be!”Good job peers: you just helped spread liberal new age nonsense, the kind that gets people into fights and causes bullying.” I may have said something like that it leads to psychopathy and narcissism and, “Read narcissism. tk” (a website I wrote on the signs of narcissism and psychopath disorder). Not sure if I said the bullying part of if I quote the happy as can be part, but that’s about exactly what I said. It was the 43rd comment (so big surprise it got noticed and of course infuriated the liberals who saw it in mass and pressed that report button). I had posted it about three times, because I saw that CNNs comment system and mangled my paragraph by breaking it up in bizarre ways, so I tried again, and it did the same thing, and once more. I then posted a comment saying, “Why the Hell does CNN keep breaking up my comments dammit!?” (And keep in mind that before hand when I would type out a 8 word paragraph, it would put my comment in moderation. Highly suspicious, it was as if some moderator flagged me for being an anti-liberal and then made it so all my comments would have to be approved of first from then on. I wouldn’t be surprised if earlier comments had been removed without letting me know.

So after my little complaint, I quickly replied to another guy who angered at least one person I saw. He had made a comment like, “Can someone explain this?” and in another comment implied, if I remember right, something like she wasn’t pretty. To his first though I replied, “They didn’t elect someone based on their beauty this time.” Some short comment like that. As millions know, comments like that, even if not inherently rude, and simply repeating what the article itself implies, that IT WAS A PRANK, NOT AN ELECTION OF BEAUTY, will, if liberals or cultists, like self-righteous type Catholics (and note, Catholics, I didn’t say all of you, so don’t freak out you sloppily reading self-righteous arrogant ones) see that you’re opposed to them, will gang up on you and attack you in some way. Even on a pro-conservative site like Infowars, banned me once for criticizing Alex Jones for being an narcissist I’m guessing, or perhaps they didn’t like me typing the link to show the signs as evidence that he had it rather than just limiting me to typing out the signs, and forcing me in a way then to make a long comment. They do put comments that use urls into moderation just like CNN does. So, I don’t bother using the http:// or www in the links, so that my comment can immediately go through. I just signed up again and (not intentionally as some revenge) continued making the usual comments, for many months now, and even saying more shocking things, that might even repel some of Alex’s Catholic supporters. I said recently for example… oh wait, I just realized I could get arrested for hate speech if I say lol, never mind… Stupid liberals. See how liberalism and atheism are partners in crime and lead to oppression, persecution, intolerance, irrationality, hate, fights, suppression of “free speech”, suppression of all the things they claim they themselves are against, yet do themselves, including by silent actions like banning and removal of things their opposition says. How can you trust people that don’t even mention what you say, and hide it from others, when you state facts, and merely because your belief system doesn’t agree with theirs? Isn’t that atheist communism or Marxism? Isn’t that a dictatorship or rule by mob? America will end up like North Korea, Cuba, Haiti or Syria, if liberals (and psychopaths and narcissists) gain even greater power than they have now. If they do, then worse cultist belief systems will take hold, like communism, Mormonism, and Catholicism (and remember what the Catholics did to Europe and South America and Haiti when they had the greatest power? Remember what the Muslim Moors did to Europe when they had the greatest power?)

Still not convinced? Then consider this: a few days ago Piers Morgan interviewed and allowed the narcissist, racist, murderer and dictator Ahmadinejad (or who plays one at least), even shook his hand and praised him with a dreamy loving smile, even after Ahm. had few minutes before said that homosexuality was an ugly act, and after Piers, in defense of homosexuals being naturally born being attracted to the same sex, gave a passionate emphatic, “Yes I absolutely believe that” (about babies being born to be sexually attracted to others of the same sex). So, CNN will allow this blatantly evil person, a narcissist, to say what he wants, but blocks me for pointing out that people like him and Piers are the type who start arguments and fights by appealing to emotion rather than reason and truth above emotion, and for saying that narcissists should be ignored. Liberalism leads to destruction, more generally: disobedience to God leads to eternal pain for those who disobey him.

If the conservatives, including the conservatives in cults, like the Mormons and Catholics do not rise up against the liberals, then America is doomed, unless God intervenes. I believe that within the next 20 years, most of the world’s population will be wiped out, with less than 13 million people left, a number far fewer than was even proposed on the depopulist Georgia Guidestones, which recommends that 500,000,000 be allowed to live. I am sure, that due to the heavy persecution of his children, and the much worse persecution to come upon them all in general, that God will not allow so many non-Christians to live. Instead he reward them with a shocking massacre, and near lethal blows, just as he did to Israel many times, even to the time of Hitler.

By the way, I noticed something very odd happened right after I tried to post an update to this article about CNN blocking me: my Logitech wireless keyboard malfunctioned, so that it would no longer work. No matter how many times I turned it off and on and mashed and shook and hit it, and even when disconnecting the USB transmitted and plugging it in again, it wouldn’t work. It would only light up (it had back lighting). It made me wonder if Satan had crept up close to me. Or maybe it was because I’d recently washed it with sanitizer wipes and the moisture (hours later?!) somehow messed it up. I don’t see how though since the wipes weren’t dripping. It was an expensive keyboard, so, if it doesn’t cost much to have it repaired, I may do so.

Update: Yesterday (10/22/2012) I posted a comment on CNN’s article on Amazon’s server problems “taking down Reddit”, it was, “Good, I hope God continues to hammer away at that atheist cesspool of sin,” which got the reply, “Wouldn’t that be a conflict of interest, he rented out space on that server” and some little lame quip not worth remembering, a troll like comment from someone who had made over 950 comments on CNN I think. I gave him a sharp reply telling him to get a life. So what did CNN do?: They removed ALL the comments, the original I made and the replies and my second reply, AND, failed to post any of my other similar replies, including one in which I asked if anyone had noticed Amazon having server problems on their home website as I have in the past4 days (5 days now). That’s liberalism for you: not just censoring Christian speech, but BIASED censoring, as in apparently, someone remembers me as being a Christian, or sees me making pro-Christian comments, then decides to be heavy handed with me if I dare defend myself against persons on CNN that troll. And how hypocritical, being that CNN a day or two before posted a front page news story about a REDDIT troll posting sexual garbage all over Reddit and getting over 800,000 subscriptions (which would mainly be from atheists, pagans (like Wiccans and witches) and Catholics (Catholics often secretly engage in activities against their religion). Apparently CNN wasn’t posting the article in disapproval, but throwing it up in the air so that it could be taken either way: they would look righteous to the those against trolling, or doing good by promoting an atheist website and helping air the “troll’s” apology. What hypocrisy.

Obama, Romney, Pros and Cons, Whose Worse?

September 22, 2012 Leave a comment


Not a direct destroyer of human life, at least in America, rather, he takes his time, as all previous presidents have. I’m talking about war, and assassinations of non-leaders.
Though he may be godless, an atheist, he promotes at least Islam, a god-centered religion.


1) Has psychopathic narcissism disorder, not merely narcissism disorder and is therefore a chronic liar, a big liar, tells many lies, is unempathetic, has no conscience, prone to sudden temper tantrums, not willing to listen to opposition except from a distance, and is only interested in using their words against them rather than trying to work with them, unless he is under extreme pressure to do so.
2) Promotes Islam (when he thinks it’s to his advantage). Islam is a polytheistic cult which in which cult members worship Mohammed and Allah and somewhat a little rock in Medina). Besides polytheist, it’s violent, sexist, racist, promotes bestiality and homosexuality and misteaches the trinity of the Bible. It’s cult founder was also a narcissist, a mass murderer and perhaps a schizophrenic one.
3) War mongering
4) Supports and indirectly encourages brutal abortions by the millions with a cold and smug attitude
5) Indirectly takes bribes
6) Wants to convert America’s government to a dictatorship (under the pretense of socialism)
7) A boaster
8) At best, a naturalized citizen of the US, but is apparently trying to impoverish America, or at best, equalize the wealth of everyone (though with the hope that the conservative-leaning Christians will be more weakened than the liberal ones and non-Christians)
9) Divisive, encourages racism by race-flaming
10) Supports liberalism (and in contradiction, Islam too), liberalism is nearly the same as socialism and libertinism, which are very destructive philosophies
11) Favors the rich (gave trillions to banks who, despite that, now will not loan money to the poor, and Obama has increased the debt of the poor by doing so)
Romney [this was accidentally placed in Romney’s section under pros for a few weeks, sorry about the confusion]


1) Promotes capitalism
2) Against socialism
3) Not godless
4) Against strong sexual perversion
5) Encourages hard work over laziness
6) A humble manner in contrast to Obama’s haughty manner
7) Is wealthy, so isn’t prone to bribes


1) Extremely arrogant: Since becoming rich and not needing to do hard manual labor, and his comment about those who believe they are victims (the 47% that support Obama), has become callous towards the poor (which may have changed a little and motivated him to make plans should he become president, to help these 47% maintain their or increase their current government benefits, being that his comment was exposed, lest his family name be cast down and Mormonism is shamed and dwindles). Further evidence of his extreme arrogance is his comment to this teacher here
2) Indirectly promotes a clearly polytheistic religion created by the narcissist Joseph Smith, who was also a sexist, adulterer, sex offender, brawl-lover, attempted mass murder in a failed war (which also ended up being a false prophecy being that he said he’d win it and is therefore a false prophet), got into a gun fight before his death. Joseph even attempted to rewrite the Bible, unlike Mohammed, who, at least the Quran says, said that the Bible was God’s word. These are many horrible to be. Joseph also caused a kind of indirect racism by confusing what it meant to be a “Jew”. Joseph deceived his followers into believing that not only were native Americans Jews, but so were Mormons, thereby defaming actual Jews and spiritually stealing their birth right. Joseph was also a sorcerer and would spend time in secret with a prostitute. He also appeared to deliberately go against God’s command to be fruitful and multiple, because despite having many wives, only had one or two children (he was deliberately avoiding having many children and depriving his wives of having children, which in turn impacted their salvation too, since having a child can cause a woman to truly turn to Christ).
3) Panders, of course, and uses flattery
4) A boaster: commits the sin that the Bible says not to: boasting about things other than knowing and understanding God, making claims about the future that are not even close to a sure thing
5) Seems to support ultimately a dictatorship being that he supports the patriot act and the NDAA act, which, basically makes him equal to Obama.
6) Probably favors the rich just as Obama does (if he doesn’t he’ll lose the election for sure being that the rich have the money to influence the masses to support or destroy him)
7) Is in favor of abortion for the same reasons Obama pretends to have (video evidence). And though he has three exceptions, still, abortionists themselves are extremely evil, and would of course make up reasons to help the girl wanting an abortion to get one due to their psychopathic love for murdering babies and getting some sort of perverted sexual pleasure no doubt out of doing so
8) Now here is a pro that could change everything: Being that Romney is not mentally ill, as in doesn’t seem, to me at least, to have any anti-social personality disorder, a permanent kind, like narcissism disorder (the best example that he doesn’t have it is his admission that he was wrong to say what he did about those relying on food stamps, a narcissist would be highly unlikely to make such an admission, and casually as he did – count the number of times Obama has ever admitted to being wrong about anything), and being that he most likely doesn’t have any anti-social disorder, there is a possibility he can improve, maybe even become a true Christian, and that might make the difference in saving one to a million or more lives, maybe even the country, or someone else’s country.

Both candidates also no doubt will continue the same oppressive laws and policies of corrections systems, so that more money will be lost to paying fines to the national or state governments or time wasted in jail or prison, and the poor will be hit the hardest. This will cause suicides to basically remain the same, or get ever worse, and poverty to continue, as it is oppressive laws and an oppressive corrections system that is one of the main problems of America, not selling, buying or using “illegal” drugs.

Whose worse? Whose better? From these facts and likelihoods, Romney is technically worse. That is because Romney was raised with some Mormon morals, which are a shadow of the Bible’s, and therefore knows better then to support baby-murder and abducting people merely on suspicion of being a danger to the lives of other Americans and imprisoning them without giving them their Biblical right to a trial by other men or women. He’s also openly against sexual perversion. Romney probably has a little conscience at least, from having been raised a Mormon however, so he would lean more towards doing moral things than Obama would, and keeping any promises he makes to the poor (and rich). Compare that to former President Bush Junior, who, due to his lack of concern and competence due to a clearly poor religious upbringing (his dad was no one moral, though was a incredibly shrewd and cunning man), cheated stock partners and got Americans killed from the 9/11 inside job. And he allowed the culprits to go free, with his help (he wouldn’t allow Cheney or himself to go under a proper trial or inquiry). He has also made no apparent effort to find out what happened to the missing passengers of the hijacked planes, to find out if they really on board, and where they are being held.

Romney so far hasn’t displayed any psychopathic coldness or stupidity like that. And Romney, though more condemnable than Obama (because unlike Obama’s lack of conscience to help him do right, Romney probably has a little conscience). Because of that, he MIGHT be more beneficial as the world as the leader of America, but by a few hairs.

So, I would say, there is no point in voting for either of these presidents unless you consider that Romney’s support of less government and more independence, including from government run schools, a significant reason. It would be better to vote for Ron Paul, whether he’s still running or not. At worst, Ron Paul would leave things as they are, leaving the states to themselves.

My Thoughts On What the Agenda Is of Obama and Romney:

From careful observation, it appears that they are trying to become dictators, or pave the way for someone who is trying to become one (the antiChrist?). This is why I believe this:

1) They approve of both the Patriot Act and NDAA. It could be argued they merely did this to get back at malicious people attacking them (like cyber harassers on the Internet or slanderous/libelous people they’d desire to get back at). Even so, that gives them dictatorship power, and they know it I’m sure.

2) US Marshals, who are basically government/federal police with jurisdiction in all states and US territories, are being used to enforce warrants even for the most petty of things, even with only one accuser, and with NO EVIDENCE. Why?: To work their way in to increasing their control over whatever they want to control. It’s a way of getting local police to letting the government intervene whenever they want to. For example, say the president personally doesn’t like some blogger, because of something he said on his blog about him. He could then get the CIA to identify the blogger (if possible) under the guise of the blogger being a potential threat, then after getting an address, and then have the local police make a warrant out for this persons arrest for something petty, like “indecent communication”. The local police, after failing, then could, from the advice of some government recommendation, save themselves money and time and simply call on the marshals to try and capture this blogger. And if the president is angry enough (or Congressman or governor, etc.), he could instruct the marshals to regularly hound the blogger at his residence, or hang out and wait for him till the man is caught. The marshals could then deliver this message in private: “Take down the article you wrote about Obama, about him being mentally ill, otherwise the next time we’ll be driving you to federal prison instead of a local jail, and we’ll never let you out if you end up in federal.”

3) The effect of impoverishing the states while increasing the wealth of the government, makes the local police more vulnerable to being taken advantage of and marginalized, and more prone to allowing certain drug cartels (if the president approves) to sell drugs in the US so long as they are paying a bribe to the government. Because federal government is harder to investigate than local government (and the feds know this), they can more easily hire corrupt government police, who would be willing to, ultimately, replace local police, so that this drug deal can go on unhindered and unexposed. Eventually the local (state) police may entirely be eliminated, so that the only police, are government police, and military police under the control of the most powerful warmongering businesses: oil companies, weapons manufacturers, military vehicle manufacturers and other giants who profit from wars. Once government control becomes complete (of course only God has truly perfect and ultimate control), it would become a dictatorship, and the constitution could be scrapped.

4) Consider also that Homeland Security was recently given millions of new bullets.

Related Article:

Why the GOP Is Scared of Ron Paul and 4 Reasons He Might Still Get the 2012 Republican Nomination

A Prediction – What May Happen After WW3

September 21, 2012 Leave a comment

If Israel fires a nuke over Iran, and specifically targets them for an EMP attack (rather than directly killing anyone and being seen as mass murderers for at least years). And suppose they do so to Saudi Arabian and Jordan just to be on the safe side, and protect themselves from revenge attacks, this would surely start WW3 as it would be seen as a major economic attack affecting all countries’ economies negatively, including the US. This then would trigger at least other EMP attacks throughout the world and nations that wouldn’t be affected much by it due to being poor, would probably face major food and ammunition shortages due to the shortage on oil (due to the electronics needed to distribute the oil worldwide in mass, being destroyed) needed for transportation of those things. And that in turn would cause the poor for sure, to start trying to steal from their neighbors for a while. That in turn would eventually lead to inter-town and city battles, perhaps even state and country battles over food and ammo and other resources to help the survivors live comfortable lives during such a horrible time. And if things get really bad because of such worldwide conflicts, food would become even scarcer. That would be due to farmers fleeing in fear for their lives when their farms or ranches are raided by everyone and their seeds perhaps even taken. Afterwards, people might start resorting to murder for food (cannibalism I mean) everywhere, after having first eaten their pets if any, hopefully, before resorting to such a horrible thing.

There would be some countries with a large amount of intact electronics though I think, mainly in Africa and South America. I believe that after or during the cannibalism stage, or just when it started, a clever man, a psychopathic narcissist would appear to take advantage of everyone’s desperation, the anti-Christ. Most likely seeing what is happening now, he’s already plotting as to how to take advantage of the world, moving his chess pieces into place, securing other partners in crime (and even planning on taking advantage of them too and backstabbing them in his justified paranoia).

I imagine he’s at leat a multi-millionaire, if not billionaire, or perhaps the spoiled son of one, and has stored away an enormous amount of fuel, food, weapons, military gear, horses and electronics to use for a world wide presidential campaign so to speak, with a well armed secret service. I imagine he’s secured friends, through bribery, promises of power and/or sexual favors of some sort, in countries not likely to be struck by EMP weapons, friends who will come to help him during his run for emperor of the world. After dispatching messengers throughout all the major cities, and acquiring followers for himself, through food handouts more lies, he’ll then have his followers resort to pillaging anyone who won’t follow him, and murdering them for food for others, as in more cannibalism. The envoys will use scare tactics, and a clever and conniving way to pressure everyone else to fall in line: take our masters mark on your forehead or hand where everyone can see it, or you won’t get our help, and no one will be able to buy or sell from those getting our help.

The millions of true Christians of course will realize what is going on, and will reject these envoys of doom, realizing they are the anti-Christ’s henchman though not yet knowing what this anti-Christ looks like. When the envoys realize the Christians are a “problem”, they will become hostile towards them and use them as a scapegoat and punching bag of convenience for the problems everyone is facing and an “easy” (so they think) source of plunder. like the Jews were in Hitler’s time and onward to today.

Some of these Christians will probably become farm and sex slaves and food fodder for the world. the Jews of of Hitler’s time. Even now most of the world scapegoats the Christians. Too bad they don’t do so with Christ and be saved (Christians who know the Bible well enough to know the Biblical term “scapegoat” know what I mean by that).

The prophecy Jesus made about the world being worse than it was then (just) before the Flood of Noah already came true, the world has gotten worse, mainly, because God’s word is available to all, and clear enough in various pages (and even if not, there are plenty of Christians and informational sources that most people can get access to through someone who has a car and computer) that anyone can find out it is his word. There are libraries everywhere. A Muslim could even trick one of his leaders by saying, “Bring me a Bible so I can show everyone how false it is” or secretly got o some Christian community for one, if he wants to check for himself if it could possibly be God’s word. The Quran itself says the Bible is God’s word, yet many Muslims won’t even listen to that, their own “holy book” from the man Mohammed they worship and whom some will murder over in their passion for him and pride. Instead they make up some easy excuse without evidence, like, “The Bible’s been tampered with so now we can’t believe it” or “Our God did away with it, said it was not as good as the Quran.” And though knowing God’s word is here on Earth, and having a good example of the Baptists and Presbyterians (the non-liberal ones) for them to follow, Christians all over the world, and though not being rich being charitable even to Muslims and other enemies of Christ, the world still refuses to heed Christ, even though knowing his greatest law: “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” So jealous are they as were the ancient Greek philosophers of Moses, that they will only refer to Christ now and then, as a good man or spiritual master, but more rare will they mention the good things he said and did. And when they do, they use them as tickets for a continued life of sin, a passport for evil. They’ll take him out of context and say, “Don’t judge.” (there should be no period after that, despite the translators of the Bible putting one there) or the other famous line, “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” And though people who say that are enemies of Christ, of the true Christians, they won’t even repeat, “Love your enemies” or “forgive your enemies” or “bless those who curse you”, because such words cut them to the heart too much, and are much harder to conceal of the meaning of. “Judge” is confused by Christian haters as meaning, “condemn” or “say we’re wrong”, though Jesus by “judge” in the “Don’t judge” passage, meant “make a moral determination about whether someone is doing right or not” (he also separated that from “condemn” mentioning that right after). So, there is a layer of confusion to figuring out what it means to judge. Those who repeat it don’t necessarily know they are saying something in a vague way or confusing way that often delays them being easily or quickly judged again, it’s due to their own confusion of the word. If they knew what Jesus meant, then they’d realize they were being hypocritical being that they are doing the very same thing by merely saying, “Don’t judge” to anyone. However, if they were to say, “You should just forgive and love your enemies like Jesus said to”, what confusion over that would there be? They’d realize in their hateful response (even though saying a good thing like that) that they are not forgiving and loving the Christian who judged them for whatever, the Christian they consider an enemy. They think they are okay as long as they say, “Don’t judge” because perhaps it is true, they don’t say, “Oh you Christians are wrong” (though hypocritically often many liberals will say fundamentalist Christians are conservatives and will say or imply that they steal, murder by war or poisoning the environment, and covet (are jealous of what they have). I think also they don’t use that line because they are simply very ignorant of the Bible, have forgotten what it teaches if they ever learned that part, and don’t want to remember and deliberately forget. So the most they do in response to a Christian word-wise when trying to use the Bible directly against them is, “Don’t judge.” Other common responses are: “Hypocrite,” “You’re ranting,” “You shouldn’t condemn,” “troll,” “go away,” “you’re crazy,” “you’re stupid,” “you’re obsessed,” “you’re a fanatic,” “you’re ignorant,” “God forbid someone else have an opinion (which is a conniving weasel tactic meant no one can have factual things to say except that Christianity is false and Christians are bad), “I have my way you have yours,” and absurd, arrogant, hypocritical and common, “Don’t shove your religion down my throat.” All of which are usually ended by a period, because they are mere insults and cheap shots meant to shield their minds from guilt or fear of God. Those insults also all apply to them.

My suggestion, learn wilderness survival skills, and buy some tent or tents and survival equipment and most important of all, learn how to get saved. If you want live forever, read this

Mat 7:15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.
Mat 7:16 You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?
Mat 7:17 So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit.
Mat 7:18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.
Mat 7:21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
Mat 7:22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’
Mat 7:23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’
Mat 7:24 “Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock.
Mat 7:25 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock.
Mat 7:26 And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand.
Mat 7:27 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.”
Mat 7:28 And when Jesus finished these sayings, the crowds were astonished at his teaching,
Mat 7:29 for he was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.

Denise Siegal – Fraud Psychic

September 21, 2012 Leave a comment

I’m listening to Coast to Coast AM right, now, to Denise Siegal, a supposed skeptical psychic and an astrology. She confuses prophecy with being psychic. That says a lot about her level of knowledge, no offense. And afterwards, George Noory, a moron, just caught her on what he thought was her contradicting herself it seemed to me, when she said she thought and felt we’re on the verge of WW3 (that’s not a prediction if you hadn’t noticed), although it wasn’t because you can do both. AND UGH: WHO IN THEE HELL NEEDS TO BE PSYCHIC TO THINK OR FEEL WE ARE?! What a stereotypical fraud psychic. Then George said after some other exchanges: “I don’t care about your opinions,” as if to be funny or rather meaning, “I only want your predictions.” After some other words she said that she FELT again that there’d be another world war sometime in the next THIRTY YEARS. WOW, AGAIN, STEREOTYPICAL VAGUE “PSYCHIC”: GIVE A BROAD AMOUNT OF TIME FOR YOURSELF TO BE RIGHT OR WRONG. What a joke. And incredible that a person like this gets a long line of comments on her about me page while someone like me, who actually teaches logic and truth, and gives evidence for what I say, clear evidence, is ignored. She doesn’t even show a picture of herself on her about me page or homepage (maybe because she knows it would be a bad idea if she wanted to get a real job, if her face became well known for for her scam). It’s shameful that liberals cheer each other on while Christians, the true ones, are usually silent.

A Stupid Business: Why Not To Invest In Microsoft

September 20, 2012 2 comments

So, I’m trying to log into msn messenger two days ago, aka the dumbly named “Windows Live”, and when I realize I’m not sure about the password, I try to go look for some software to unveil the hidden password, and when I move my mouse I accidentally select “forget me” or whatever it says while logged out, do I get a “are you sure?” No, instead it wipes the email and password instantly. Awesome, not. So then I go to my online email account using IE, and unlike the usual for hotmail, I’m still logged in. YET, when I go to change my password since none of them were working to get into msn messenger, and instead of going through some simple no brainer steps, I get instead some other page that says, “since dis is sensitive info u must do such and such” as in PUT IN YOUR PASSWORD TO CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD. DUMB. So then of course I try their steps to fill out the info I put in when signing up. But since I don’t use live email much, because gmail is superior, and because I don’t use msn messenger and I barely use it cuz they won’t get rid of that dumb big fat obese advertising/home page thing on it, I can’t remember the details either. It did however ask who the last person I sent an email out to was, so I put that in. But what happens two days later, do I get a, “Oh, so this is your email account, and this is a recently sent out email, and you did give the correct birthday, so here’s a password reset link.” No, instead:

We recently received a request to recover your account Microsoft account Unfortunately, we were unable to verify your ownership of this account using the information you provided. Microsoft takes the security and privacy of our customers very seriously, and our commitment to protecting your personal information requires that we take the utmost care in ensuring that you are the account owner.

Please submit a new account verification form
At this point, your best option is to submit a new form with as much accurate information as you can gather. The more information you can include in the form, the better the chance you’ll have of regaining access to your account. We’ve included a few tips below to help you fill out the form as completely and accurately as possible.

> Submit a new form

Helpful tips for filling out another form:

  • Answer as many questions as you can.
  • Use the information you provided when you created the account, or last updated it.
  • Submit the form from a computer you frequently use.
  • You will be asked to list recently used email addresses and the subject lines from recent emails. Ask for help from family members, friends, or business contacts to confirm their email addresses and tell you the subject lines of the last three emails they sent you.
  • Make sure to use the correct domain for your account, such as,, or Keep in mind that your email address may be country specific. For example, if you created your account in Sweden, your domain would be “” rather than “”.


     > Submit a new form

Thank you,

Microsoft Support Team

Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052

Account recovery request 56270412 is now closed. Please do not reply to this message. Replies to this message are routed to an unmonitored mailbox.


Here’s my idea: If I’m logged in, and can change things like my profile, how about let me be able to contact a customer service person, just as easily as allows it, and show I’m logged in and would like my password changed? Why are these rich moron CEOs so utterly dumb and out of touch? Or is it they want money? Because I noticed at the bottom of the recovery form was something about entering your billing information. Rich people are shit aren’t they? I hope if Obama is reelected that he taxes them to death. I definitely won’t be giving Microsoft my money for their email service with massive stupidity like that. How can it help their business to make life oppressive for their users? And what’s with Yahoo email? Why do they make it impossible to connect it to an email client like Thunderbird, unless I guess, you pay them. I’ll still with Gmail, which doesn’t give me as hard a time as those two dumb companies.

Why the Feds (Homeland Security) Bought Massive Amounts of Ammo

September 20, 2012 3 comments

They are prepping for:

A national or world wide cataclysm: solar flares, sudden worldwide earthquakes or an “unlucky” event in which a mix of major and minor disasters all happen to the nation at once, which might set off an economic collapse and an ongoing surge of riot-looting, and even groups which specifically form for the purpose of looting and anti-government attacks, which they may, in their stereotyping of Christians, fear will come due to their belief that God is with them and would have them get rid of the government during such a time when it would be vulnerable to a more successful overthrow. They may fear that these potential rebel Christians would quickly gain followers, who though not agreeing with their Christian or quasi Christian beliefs, would join them just to have a chance at forming their own type of government, somewhere in America. They may also fear that foreign provocateurs/infiltrators/plants from Russia, China, Venezuela or Cuba would use such situations to foment a successful overthrow and/or to pressure America into falling in line more with/becoming passive to their policies in the name of world peace and prosperity (something the anti-Christ would try to do the Bible implies, so that he could more easily take advantage of them) . A false messiah or messiahs also might try to take advantage of disasters or overthrow events that result from them. Drug lords may also join in or be hired by foreign enemies to help in an overthrow attempt. They might get Mexico and Venezuela to help take over New Mexico, Arizona, California and the lower half of Texas.

And since the world may see that Obama hates America and wants to diminish America’s power to make the world more equal, these things may especially happen if he wins his run for the presidency again. The CIA and military-industrial complex may go along with Obama in hopes to draw out all the most willing enemies of the country to crush them, for self centered or not reasons, perhaps they are hoping to gain new technology through a new world war like they did when they defeated Germany and are hoping Mexico will come up with some revolutionary tech in the fight, or perhaps that some Americans will, perhaps they are hoping Venezuela will join in, to make the spoils greater).

The feds and liberal state governments may also try to pull off something evil during a war against foreigners, like enslave all Christians who refuse to participate, or force them to fight to defend them or hope that while everyone is distracted by the foreign attacks, send out death squads to eliminate districts who oppose liberalism.

The feds may also be preparing to fend off China and Russia and possible Muslim allies from Jordan and Saudi Arabia who would help Russia and China if they thought that the US was going to stop buying mideast oil. Such forces would surely attempt to take over the White House and Pentagon.

Such forces may even have EMPs prepared to use as a surprise attack, especially if they think they are on the verge of losing their take-over attempt.

They may also be buying such large amounts, in addition to those reasons, if some fear an alien invasion, and because in a economic collapse, the price of ammo would become higher, and the government is already in bad economic condition. One more reason may be to send money into ammo companies in hopes that those companies will show liberals favor in the future, and that includes Obama at the election polls, and side with the liberals in any overthrow attempts, as in sell to them only, and reveal to them any of their enemies attempting to buy ammo from them. There are no other logical reasons for buying such large amounts of ammo, except insanity.

God: There shall be one law for the native and for the stranger who sojourns among you

September 19, 2012 Leave a comment

A new fallacy for you: The Freedom of Religion Fallacy (or Freedom of Way of Life Fallacy)

It occurred to me a few minutes ago while reading some CNN story about the Muslim violence supposedly over the Innocence of Muslims video, a story about a French newspaper making a cartoon over Mohammed that might cause more violence, why God required that foreigners in his land Israel obey the his laws when moving there. Truly this liberal (anti-Christian) “be whatever religion” you want hypocrisy is more logical fallacy equality nonsense. And yep: it goes against conservatism too. Do you get what I mean? Satan blinds a lot of you pretty bad, so I’ll explain: if someone’s religion opposes the law of God (or any thing they do), like “Don’t murder” or “Don’t steal” (hear this gypsies) it causes trouble of some kind, and can lead to physical harm and death. That is why if all countries simply obeyed God there would be no trouble. Yet by trying to use liberal (anti-Christian) philosophy or the conservatist’s “freedom of religion” one, you end up, logically, with conflict. Hence Muslims and gypsies any everyone else committing crimes to no end because they believe THEIR religion, their commands, what they feel like doing trumps God’s commands. So you get: adultery, murder, rebellion against parents, theft, drunken idiocy, fights between neighbors, mobs, riots and on and on. Read how to get eternal life at my journal at if you want to help break this cycle of endless violence against God.

As Jesus said, you can’t have two masters, you must hate one and obey the other, so to with God, you can’t have yourself as an equal to God, or “Lie when you think it’s best” and “Don’t lie” as equal laws.