Archive

Archive for February, 2012

Liberal Scientists Murder Healthy Baby Natasha, Because ”She Was Handicapped”

February 27, 2012 Leave a comment

Aborted baby lived 45 minutes, but still deliberately terminated by doctors.

2/27/2012 5:52 P.M:

I had a realization about five minutes ago: If abortion supporters justify abortion, the murder of a baby on the inside of another human’s body by saying, “A woman has the right to do what she wants with her own body” or “We have the right to…” then using that logic shouldn’t they also approve of murdering people outside of their own body, since they say they can do what they want with their body? Because doing whatever you want would include ANYTHING, not just anything TO YOUR OWN BODY. And so they should also approve of taking whatever drug we want to, eating whatever we want to, suicide and external torture of others, murder (murdering people outside the body), torture and death penalties. Further evidence of their contradictory justification and hypocrisy is if they claim they simply have been poorly wording their justification and meant what I stated here, which is “OWN BODY” they would be evidently lying, since pro-abortionists ALWAYS SUPPORT using ANOTHER HUMAN to murder the baby OF ANOTHER HUMAN, in other words, using someone elses help, like a practiced abortionist or using the help of the one who got them pregnant if no one else will. No pro-choice person as far as I know in my my long experience in life, has ever said, “You should abort your own baby by yourself.” Although I am sure there are people who though supporting “a woman’s right to choose” who wouldn’t, and who would say something like, “You let yourself get pregnant, be responsible for killing your own baby then and don’t involve someone else who had nothing to do with it, except probably in the case of rape.” But, I no of no one who has ever said that, so I am confident to say all abortion-supporters are contradictory hypocrites who support the worst kind of murder: murdering a defenseless baby while it’s still being formed within it’s mother. Not even attempting to kill a child who can run, and who can be argued has already committed some bad sins, by being unthankful to its parents after a few years of kindness, and being a trouble-maker, but a baby who has barely had a chance to live, who hasn’t even breathed air yet.

Further, it’s now a known fact that most people abort a baby out of “convenience,” making these abortion-supporters all the more evil, since the majority of them aren’t doing it for some noble reason like they might want Christians to think, like, “To keep the population down, so others can live without starving and being in great pain, and to keep people from living miserably from being very poor and being oppressed by the rich,” no, it’s so, “I can live more comfortably.” So, a brutal murder of the most least bad humans of all so you can afford more barbecue or tofu, soy milk, have more carefree sex, parties, relaxation, sleep, an easier time in school and a better social life, just forget about the person you murdered or about to be murdered never getting to experience those things on Earth. And how convenient for the ones that believe in reincarnation: “It’ll be someone elses problem, and eventually someone won’t abort them and they will be born to a well-off family or someone who is willing to suffer dealing with a kid.” And some, especially atheists, justify baby-murder as “punishment of rapists” (and rapists care? all rapists? rapists aren’t interested in sex it’s about making babies?). Using that logic how can they then bash God and the Bible for “punishing the children for the sins of their fathers” as he once did, or punishing anyone to teach someone else “a lesson” or scare them or punish them somehow so they won’t “sin” again? And how hypocritical for the abortion supporters who condemn capitalism and living an “excessive” life-style and who believe in being one with nature, who justify abortion for “convenience”; I’m sure hypocrites like that exist because I encounter incredibly stupid, hypocritical and contradictory people often. There is another point of hypocrisy with pro-choicers: Why do they say, “It’s a woman’s right to choose” rather than “It’s a female’s right to choose” being that as far as I’ve read and heard, they also support the right of a 12 year old to abort her baby. And being that they support that, and being that many of them also support homosexual (gay and lesbian) preteen sex, shouldn’t they also support the right of pre-teens to have sex whenever they want to, and with anyone of any age? Why y if they can “choose their own sexuality, have sex with the same sex while still a preteen, and brutally murder their own baby while it’s even still inside of them without their parents consent” would it be “a sin” or “immoral” or “unethical” or “bad karma” as all these confused and confusing groups say, who can hardly get along with each other at times, draw the line at a pre-teen or teen having sex with someone one or two years older or younger or much older or younger, at some age difference that they can’t agree on? Many don’t even realize that marrying age laws differ from state to state and country to country, and that they simply believe what they do due to cult-like brainwashing and blindly and arbitrarily following perverted old men and women in the government (and the lobbyists who bribe them) who hate them or believe that they are superior to them. They sure do love to oppose them though when these old perverted men when it comes to religion in public and private (free speech issues), same-sex sexuality issues, saving “nature” and baby-killing (and baby killing is okay for many liberal “save the trees, chickens, cows and Lady Gaga” people), but uh oh, bad if a kid wants to have sex with an adult. And many conservatives, libertarians and liberals think or say they think that that isn’t possible, maybe because they’ve been living in underground caves watching CNN, Fox News or Nickelodeon all day and were ugly all throughout their childhood and young adult years and their parents had them playing with stupid toys or studying all day. Either they are pretending they don’t think it’s possible out of some collective paranoia, or they really are that stupid, ignorant and unaware of the obvious. And why for those who call preteens and people up to 21 even, “kids” do they approve of them doing drugs, aborting, and having sex, but just not with someone some arbitrary number of years younger or older than them?! And if they are so against Christians judging others, and saying who should be able to have sex with who, let alone murdering a bay being right or not, why then do they often become infuriated at the thought of a “kid” having sex with an adult or even just flirting with one, or “worse”, if the adult flirts back or allows the kid to have sex with them? Why the crazy standards? Can anyone explain away all these hypocritical standards and judgments? Only a stupid, arrogant, evil person who didn’t bother to read this article carefully would believe they could.

Clearly, to those who aren’t spiritually blind, pro-abortionists have exchanged God for temporary comfort and truth for ignorant “bliss” and have seared their conscience and deluded themselves into thinking to murder the innocent for whatever reason is better than being inconvenienced and struggling in life, and as a result are callous, cold-hearted, shallow and deeply confused.

Categories: abortion, homosexuality, Homosexuals, junk science, karma, liberalism, liberals, Mainstream Science, preteen and teen sexuality, sexuality Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

”Get a real job!” writes bankster to Californian waitress Breanna

February 26, 2012 Leave a comment

Get a real job! The note with 1 per cent tip left by wealthy banker
after $133 lunch as an insult to the 99 percent
By Beth Stebner
Feb/26//2012/5:12

An arrogant banker has done all in his power to enforce his position as the ‘one per cent,’ all the while reminding everyone else they’re not.

After dining on a meal at a boutique Newport Beach, California restaurant, the banker left only $1.33 on a $133.54 tab.

Adding insult to injury, he gave the server, Breanna, another tip: ‘Get a real job.’ – More here

And Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly, I say to you, only with difficulty will a rich person enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.” When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished, saying, “Who then can be saved?” But Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.” – Matthew 19:23-26

“Listen, my beloved brothers, has not God chosen those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to those who love him? But you have dishonored the poor man. Are not the rich the ones who oppress you, and the ones who drag you into court? Are they not the ones who blaspheme the honorable name by which you were called? If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well. But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.” – James 2:5-9

And he lifted up his eyes on his disciples, and said:
Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.
Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you shall be satisfied.
Blessed are you who weep now, for you shall laugh.
Blessed are you when people hate you and when they exclude you and
revile you and spurn your name as evil on account of the Son of Man!
Rejoice in that day, and leap for joy, for behold,
your reward is great in heaven; for so their fathers did to the prophets.
But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation.
Woe to you who are full now, for you shall be hungry.
Woe to you who laugh now, for you shall mourn and weep.
Woe to you, when all people speak well of you,
for so their fathers did to the false prophets.
But I say to you who hear, Love your enemies,
do good to those who hate you,
bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you.
To one who strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also,
and from one who takes away your cloak do not withhold your tunic either.
Give to everyone who begs from you, and from one who takes away your goods
do not demand them back.
And as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them.
If you love those who love you, what benefit is that to you?
For even sinners love those who love them.
And if you do good to those who do good to you,
what benefit is that to you? For even sinners do the same.
And if you lend to those from whom you expect to receive,
what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to
sinners to get back the same amount.
But love your enemies, and do good, and lend,
expecting nothing in return,
and your reward will be great,
and you will be sons of the Most High,
for he is kind to the ungrateful and the evil.
– Luke 6:20-35

Related:

Rich people more likely to cheat, behave badly, research finds

Ian Punnet Equates Lying and Racism In the Quran With ”Killing” In the Bible

February 26, 2012 Leave a comment

On Saturday, very early in the morning, on Coast to Coast AM, the heretic Ian Punnet, whose ears God struck, once again defamed and slandered God. A caller called in to say that he had great concern as to whether or not Muslims could be trusted in general anymore because of their repeated extreme violence in contrast to the reaction of Christians (when things like a “holy book” are burned). Ian’s idiot response was right out of the Shallow Handbook of Atheist and Pagan Arguments Against Christians. Yet Ian claims to be a Christian deacon, and makes himself out to be a scholar and a good person. The caller added to his reasoning was that the Quran says that Muslims are not to befriend Christians or Jews and to lie to them, which is a fact. Ian then replied that he would hope that Christians wouldn’t be judged the way this man was judging Muslims, and that the Bible for example (Ian’s false example) gives “Christians the right to kill people of cities they conquered.” That’s nearly the exact statement with no meaningful difference. Ian’s terrible argument is the argument of atheists and pagans who take verses out of context. Ian might as well have said, “The Bible is not all right, it has mistakes” which is a lie, and negates the authority of the Bible, and makes man the ultimate judge over what God’s word and what is morally right or wrong. First of all, the verse or passage he is referring to does not say, “Christians have the right to conquer and kill you.” Second, it’s not implied. Third, it’s GOD’S RIGHT to have “Christians” or Jews or anyone conquer or kill whomever he wants unless God had said before that he would not do so, especially if he promised not to. Ian obviously disagrees that God has the right do change the leadership a person has or to take away their life, why else would he have said that? Fourth, think about how evil Ian’s comparison is, he compared conquering and killing (not murdering) to being something evil like lying, racism and hatred. Is conquering necessarily equal to lying, racism and hatred? Was ancient Rome when it was conquering, being racist? Did they say, “We are trying to conquer you Celts because you are white.”? No they didn’t, that isn’t why they tried to conquer them. What about killing, is killing a sheep or a person in war no different than lying? Obviously these aren’t the same things. Further, killing a person won’t necessarily send them to right to Hell, but if you lie to them, and tell them that it’s good to murder, and to take verses in the Bible out of context and to obey the Quran when it says not to befriend Christians or Jews, and to lie to them and randomly terrorize them, and to heavily tax non-Muslims, no matter what, you could provoke someone to hate the true God and everyone else and to then end up in Hell from having been corrupted. Ian, as a deacon, and not a mere Christian, is required to know easy-to-figure-out things like that about the Bible and morality. And does killing equate to not befriending a person necessarily? Is it necessarily an unfriendly act? Even the heretic Ian, a liberal heretic who believes homosexuality is good, and that demons don’t exist (because there couldn’t possibly be bad angels, because… why?!) would probably agree that if you kill someone to end their chronic pain if it’s preventing a person from enjoying life, and that there’s no sign of it stopping, is a good thing too. So then he most likely contradicted himself that killing can only be a bad thing. Further, if God commanded a Christian to execute a Christian friend of that Christian for having murdered some liberal narcissist like Ian Punnet, would the Christian doing the executing necessarily be doing a hateful thing to his friend, or could he simply be carrying out God’s justice? The answers are obvious to anyone who has a decent understanding of Bible basics and morality, and God, all of which Ian doesn’t have, and yet he points out often, that he’s a deacon.

When the caller said that Christians didn’t have the same reaction as Muslims to things like the burning of a holy book, Ian said as if it were fact that that wasn’t true by saying to go to the deep south (of the US) and to announce that you’re going to burn a Bible and give your name and number out and I think he said address. He repeated that, and then said, “We can go on like this all night” which to me implied that Ian had memorized cheap shot attacks against Christians, and not just that stereotype. Question: Why has Ian memorized the attacks against Christianity, and not the defenses? What kind of Christian deacon is that? Is he possibly sick in the head with a deep hatred for Christians? Why else would he stereotype “deep southern Christians” so emphatically? What is his evidence that Christians there will become physically violent and go on a days long murder spree if you announce, merely announce you will burn a Bible? Muslims in all areas of the world have a long endless history of severe violence and racism towards Jews, this isn’t true with a large majority of Reformed Christians (who are a large minority, not a small cult, and therefore are significant and Christians cannot simply be generalized as all being the same), whose violence has been sporadic and contained to small areas. The bad spots were entirely from the Dutch, who in their attempt to free themselves from Catholic control, made war with them, and it wasn’t some endless war spanning hundreds of years and in which the Dutch tried to conquer any Catholic cities, again, it was a war to gain independence. The other was the Salem Witch Trials, and another was when a few Quakers were executed when they kept trespassing onto their land and preaching their version of the gospel to them (which is also harassment). Another possible spot is when Willem Kieft, a psychopath hired by the Dutch West India Company to make peace with the Native Americans (for business reasons, not religious), instead, brutally massacred between 80-120 of them and later about 500 more using the help of the Mohawks and some Dutch military troops. And his fighting was not without protest from other Dutch. He was later fired. There is no evidence that Willem was a Christian, let alone one held in high esteem, or that anyone who participated in the massacre was either. And even if the Dutch in general who approved of being brutal to and robbing Native Americans were Christians, it doesn’t necessarily mean they were forgiven and had God dwelling in them, because, the Bible says, that “whoever hates his brother is a murderer” and doesn’t have eternal life. The Bible also makes it clear that there will be false Christians, including ones who will betray other Christians and teach demonic things. Further, all Christians are not Dutch, and racism has not been a major problem, unlike with cults like the Mormons. Also, it is a myth that John Calvin (a Dutch Christian who rebelled against the Catholic Church) was for burning witches and anyone teaching that is myth-spreading.(1)(2) Reformed Christians are known for their charity to impoverished countries in Africa and South America and to Haiti. Mormons, despite the racism being pointed out, DEFEND IT. For example the narcissist(s?) of the FAIRMormon wiki when referring to their former leader Joseph Fielding Smith does not say that when he implied “darkies” (blacks) were inferior was wrong to do so, but instead points their finger at the writers of a magazine called “LOOK”, by virtually saying, “But look, they are racist too because they have no pictures of blacks except in one page where they are getting charity.” And wow, how wrong to inspire charity for blacks, right? Wrong. So, let no one say that the sinful Catholics are representative of the entire church, or that the Protestants so called for protesting against them are also represented by them, especially not the distinct Reformed ones among them, so called “Calvinists” who are despised by the Catholics and other Protestants who side with the ancient heretic rival of Calvin, Jacob Arminius.

Other facts about Ian: he claimed that the KJV was NOT literal and that it was a paraphrase (I wrote about that many months ago). Ian is stupid, ignorant and despite claiming to know the Bible, is obviously a person who hates who is against the clear rules God made. If Ian doesn’t know the basics of how to defend the Bible, what is he doing playing teacher of the Bible and calling himself a deacon for? What evil people elected him deacon if he’s ignorant about how to defend God’s will? He is what the Bible calls a “false teacher” and a heretic, and is one millions of others spreading hatred of God and confusion.

New Ager Lori Tove and Her ”I Am America Map”

February 23, 2012 1 comment

Lori Tove with her was on Coast to Coast AM yesterday night, promoting her New Age life style and her I Am America Map. She said the ascended masters (demons) that she talks to and consults are always wrong about the dates (prophecies) they give for when disasters will happen, and was emphatic about that. She also claimed to have knowledge of what happened to Atlantis and how the people lived, from the ascended masters.

Why if they are always wrong about their prophecies (and repeatedly lying to her then), and therefore not trustworthy, does she promote her map that she drew up from them and claim to know what happened to Atlantis? This is just more obvious evidence that anti-fundamentalist New Agers are not good, immoral, hypocrites, deceivers and confused.

“Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving” – 1 Timothy 4:1-4

World War 3 | Why To Avoid Wells Fargo | Major iTunes Annoyance | Free Will and Salvation

February 18, 2012 Leave a comment


Some yummy food I ate called Daifuku, from Japan, on the 11th.
In English called Melon Rice Cake. Click here or the pic to buy some.

This Wouldn’t Fit On Twitter

I bought an iPod two weeks ago, and connected it again, and using a nice data cable I found (which I had found it two weeks earlier so I hadn’t bought a pair for nothing) and now have gotten the absurd message, “The iPOD “Mark’s iPod” can be synced with only one iTunes library at a time. What would you like to do?”

And the absurd options are “Erase and Sync” replaces the contents of this iPod with the contents of this iTunes library.

“Transfer Purchases” copies iTunes Store purchases this computer is authorized to play from this iPod to this iTunes library.

Well, the first option sounds horrid, being that I bought (unknowingly) with 699 songs son it and a total of 1,344 files, most of which I haven’t heard yet. Over 120 of the files were purchased. I have no idea what the second option is talking about, but do know I’ve not bought anything from the i Store yet, so why in the world would it ask me something so stupid? It seems true that Apple is worse than Microsoft as someone said about a week or two ago on the radio show on The Alex Jones Show, I think, either that or it was Coast to Coast AM.

[Update, discovered this: iTunes Store: Transferring purchases from your iOS device or iPod to a computerI’m not sure if I should be disgusted, and my nose is curled after having read that page, or to just think that it’s clever business practice. It does make me want to find a way to get the songs copied and to then install Rockbox though.] [Update Feb/21/2012: I found out the next day that Rockbox doesn’t work on 3rd generation nanos.]

I recently downloaded some pretty ancient style Chinese music. Some of the songs make me a little hungry for Chinese food.

Other news: found a nice 24″ wheel dual suspension bike in the desert. Looks a little moderately beat up from the sun and dirt and weather wear, but they tires I pumped up haven’t gone flat at all it seems for over 12 hours, and it works well other than the shifters [update: hours later after making this post and more riding on the bike and happy to say the tubes are holding the air]. My knees got in some pain because of that. But hey, that’s an $50 gain, extra transport options, and another $7 gain from having found that iPod data cable last night. Found some some nice linens at the same time as the data cable and a beautiful photo book of some sort in very good condition. Haven’t look through it hardly yet though, seems interesting though. And about thirty minutes ago discovered that I had succeeded in making something better or just as good as yogurt. I’m very much looking forward to trying it because it smells and looks good. Now if only I had a decent income so that I wouldn’t be hungry all the time like I usually am these days.

A Disciple of Christ cultist made some heretical comments to me yesterday on my About Me page and I made very thorough replies to him showing how a major part of salvation works and does not work, and which concerns “free will” which I’ve written about before. I hope that for those who don’t understand free will, or how it works in relation to God’s salvation plan, will benefit from reading my two responses to him. He made two long evil comments after my last response to him, starting them out also with mere insults I could see, but like I said to him, am ignoring them (and don’t know what they say after the insults, other than having glanced and saw that one was sloppily packed with a large amount of various verses that he no doubt misused). You can learn more about this cult from these sites: (1) (2) (3).

I lost my Wells Fargo bank card again. It was the only one with money on it. I was really looking forward to buying some chocolate icecream a few hours ago, but can’t find the card. I’m seriously considering closing my WF bank account because the shareholders sneakily allowed a new policy to be made which negated the one I agreed to, so that under my nose they stole $26 from me ($13 for two months) rather than making it clear they had changed it. Instead they repeatedly refuse to give it back, ignoring that I’m disabled, claiming they told me by email, as if no one ever gets junk from Wells Fargo, or anyone else. How are they so stupid that they are unaware that people are constantly distracted by junk mail? Oh wait: they know that, hence why they used email rather than signs on their bank, and warnings from the tellers. Wells Fargo is allegedly making people pay $15 a month unless they agree to their new schemes, because the government has forbade banks to gouge people when they (accidentally?) bounce an account. So if they get forbidden from steal from accidents from some customers, they will try and REGULARLY steal from all customers, and for about the same amount as a bounce. Is that honest, or is that SICK? And of course, they show no concern for the disabled, just sweep all their customers’ money up as if impoverishing customers that you’re supposed to be trying to save for long term profits was a good thing. But perhaps, Wells Fargo doesn’t see any long term profits, and is trying the grab and run method, since they see that World War III is possibly very close. Perhaps they have a very long term plan in which their weakest customers are eliminated (and making it harder for there to be a regeneration of any middle class or new rich people to compete with the existing ones, which is desirable by the elitist globalist New World Order no doubt to me), a very long term goal in which they will use their giant money boost to survive WW 3 (at the expense of their poorest customers).

If any of you are Christians, truly saved Christians (remember to read what I say about saved Christians on my About Me page if you don’t believe a Christian can be saved now), pray that Christians hold up to WWW III, which I believe is not 100 years away away, but will happen within 20 years. Pray for me too, that I will have always have pleasant food and drink. Times are hard for me; I discovered four nearby homeless people that were living much better than me, in that they regularly ate and drank well. I wish I had food stamps too. It seems to me as if almost everyone else is enjoying them but me, but, I hate to “leech” of others.

On the 20th I discovered that I had accidentally made butter in trying to do a certain something. It tasted better than butter, but not olive oil butter. It was almost equal to olive oil better in taste. It had more of a neutral taste. It was like a cross between butter and mayonnaise.

Other Photos I Recently Shot

These are photos of an outdoor fire place area I made on the 8th. It’s incomplete. I want to add two more boulder-seats. It’s the best fire stone circle/sitting area around in the desert. The rest look like junk made by brain-damaged ogres. I put a dime in the middle in one of the pics to give an idea of how big the objects in the photos are. I had to move most of these stones, and the farthest boulder seemed at least 15 feet away. They were not easy to move or position or keep from moving around when sat on.

A tiny nearby cave I found on the 15th. I saw some metallic stuff in the left corner inside and spider webs, but no spider, and stupidly extracted the item which turned out to be a chain. And when I looked afterwards at the pics I took of the web, saw an adult black widow on it. !!! Thanks to God I wasn’t bitten:


I made a little fireplace in the cave after exploring it using a nearby rusted metal grill and rocks:

The frustrating iPod Nano 3G I bought. I got it from the same store and same time as Next comfort bike in the next picture below. I also got the iPod with a future replacement warranty that gives me the option to trade it in for another model within a certain amount of months.

A blue dual suspension Next brand comfort bike in very good condition to like new condition (except for punctured but probably repairable tube, which I’ve already replaced) that I bought on the 3rd. It was $50 but got it at $40 because a genius homeless sociopath haggled for me.

The Next brand d.s. mountain bike I found in the desert on the 15th.

A humble but tasty dish of hamburger, mushroom and lettuce I made on the 14th.

Categories: Knight's Personal Life Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

”Evil Bible”? What Anti-Christians Conveniently Ignore

February 9, 2012 1 comment

Post link: http://goodbible.tk

Sociopaths, Psychopaths, Narcissists, anti-Christians and deliberate atheists love to say the Bible is evil and take verses out of context (which is no different then non-Jewish racists taking Jews out of the context of the world they live in to make themselves look righteous and superior). Everyone who had studied religion, especially Christianity, for a few years on the Internet will have come across a moron pulling out a verse and committing the fallacy of “begging the question” basically meaning “making no point” or adding “evil” and other denigrations to the end of the verse, as if that somehow explains everything (which is the same fallacy plus the fallacies of emotionalism and mere insult). It is as stupid as anyone including psychopaths, quoting, “Do not lie,” and then saying, “bad!” or “Don’t murder”; immoral!” A favorite Truth-denier attack of racists and atheists is to bring up God killing of many Amalekites, and adding that God killed women and children too. But again, they make no point. God gives and takes away life all the time, what about it? Are women superior to males that God shouldn’t take away their lives? Are kids necessarily superior to adults or more moral? Is a little haeful kid superior to a moral and self-controlled adult? And who said the Amalekites were superior to the Jews? What is the evidence they were better? Did God say, “I’m going to kill them merely because they aren’t Jews” or “I just don’t like them,” or “I’m going to kill them all because they wouldn’t let the Jews pass through this wasteland.” No he didn’t, and it’s not implied. In fact, as I’ve pointed out to Muslims and others, the Bible repeatedly says that the Jews were not good, not a single one, and were corrupt, and had become worse than their enemies because they knew right from wrong much better than their enemies being that God wrote it out clearly for them, but worshiped empty imaginary gods anyways. Does that sound like racism? Obviously not. Racists do not insult themselves as much as their enemies because they usually believe themselves to be superior. Yet the Bible is filled more with condemnations of Jews then any other racial group.

Further, if God, the supreme perfect being wanted to kill less than 0000000000001% of the world’s population, or just one 8 year old for committing the least wrong thing to do, who is above God to say, “Thou shalt not kill anything for any reason unless I approve.” Who in the world has authority over God, or comes close to the definition of God? Who is close to perfect? Even if God were not perfect, who is that they can command or restrict God? No one. So to judge (as in condemn) God, is silly, futile, arrogance; it is childish talk to say, “I know better than the one who created me, knows everything, controls all things and sustains me.”

Atheists also ignore what God does not say he did when saying he kills left and right: no where does God say he kills millions of people a day and instantly punishes anyone for doing wrong. The Bible does not, on every page, say, “God kills millions a day, God can’t be appeased.” And notice atheists never point out that God also creates more people a day then die? Notice they NEVER point out anything positive, not even the most commonly known thing about the Bible, that being that is says not to lie? Why don’t atheists point out the positive? Hence why the Bible calls such people, “fault finders” because that’s all they are looking for. It’s fault finders who are the ones who are always angry, who are always “negative” and unfun. They live to make accusations while ignoring their own faults. It’s as if they were accusing everyone else in order to keep judgment off themselves, like a criminal in court who doesn’t want to accept responsibility for his crimes, or a bitter kid who doesn’t want to admit to his parent that he had done something wrong (which he did do).

How is it deliberate atheists can ignore Exodus 23:9, Luke 6:27-41 and Mark 10:17-21? And out of everything in the Bible, they single out the “Don’t judge” verse and take it out of context and arbitrarily accept that it’s supposed to end in a period. and use it as a personal shield and weapon against the very people who obey God. Now THOSE are the true hypocrites. Even if they saw that “Don’t judge” didn’t end in a period, such hypocrites in their carelessness wold still be fault-finders and take it out of context anyways, and spin it as something that agrees with them. They vomit on every verse but that one, conveniently using it as a SHIELD to protect themselves from judgment, while insulting Christians for using God as a shield, as if “Don’t judge” wasn’t apart of God’s word, as if God only afforded protection for those that hated what he said. Do you see the twisted evil and hypocrisy? And ironically that verse is taken out of context on a passage concerning the HYPOCRISY of non-Christian judges judging forgiven Christians!

…to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also. If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you would have them do to you.

If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that. And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, expecting to be repaid in full. But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.

Don’t judge, and you will not be judged. Don’t condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.”

He also told them this parable: “Can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into a pit? The student is not above the teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like their teacher.

Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? – Luke 6:27-41

As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?

“Why do you call me good,” Jesus answered, “No one is good—except God alone. You know the commandments: ‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, you shall not defraud, honor your father and mother.’”

“Teacher,” he declared, “all these I have kept since I was a boy.”

Jesus looked at him and loved him. “One thing you lack,” he said. “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come follow me.” – Mark 10:17-21

“Don’t oppress a foreigner; you yourselves know how it feels to be foreigners, because you were foreigners in Egypt.” – Exodus 23:9

Other sites that refute atheists, anti-Christians and pagans:

http://jesusobviouslyexisted.tk
http://theshroud.tk
http://thecities.tk
http://creationwiki.com
http://kenham.tk
http://darwinslies.tk

Whenever an anti-Christian parrot pastes links to you without explanation, reply with those, without explanation.