Study: Children of Unmarried Parents Worse Off Claim Researchers

From NPR
8/16/2011

As more and more U.S. couples decide to have children without first getting married, a group of 18 family scholars is sounding an alarm about the impact this may have on those children.

In a new report out on Tuesday, they say research shows the children of cohabiting parents are at risk for a broad range of problems, from trouble in school to psychological stress, physical abuse and poverty.

The study is put out by the National Marriage Project and the Institute for American Values, groups whose missions include strengthening marriage and family life. It suggests a shift in focus is needed away from the children of divorce, which has long been a preoccupying concern for such scholars.

Brad Wilcox, a report co-author and head of the National Marriage Project, says divorce rates have steadily dropped since their peak in 1979-80, while rates of out-of-wedlock childbearing have soared. Forty-one percent of all births are now to unwed mothers, many of them living with — but not married to — the child’s father. – Continued here with audio

So once again, the Bible is proved true, including where it commands rapists to marry a virgin they rape. Can you figure out why now? And for you who say, “AWWW OOOOOH OH MY GOD WHAT ABOUT THE WOMAN’S RIGHTS!?” You’re forgetting the study just mentioned, forgetting that such a law would be to the benefit of the child, especially in the culture of the world at that time (especially if the rapist learned his lesson by not running away, or just paying some small fine or some other inadequate compensation or God letting him be free to decide, “I’ll just kill her or the baby to get away with what I did.” During those times (and still among many Orthodox Jews and many millions of Muslims), women were discriminated against if they were thought to be adulterous and that the Israelites were in a barren desert, and were going to wander there for 40 years. And how many men today would want to marry a woman with a child not there own or from a racist? So it’s in favor of the woman. And as for “rights”, what “rights”? The concept of human rights developed from ancient Greek Sophists (ever heard of “sophistry”?) who claimed that all humans were equal, which is a false statement. Physically, they are not equal: women are at a disadvantage because of their strength and are not as aggressive as men in general, and in my opinion, it’s apparent that they are not as innovative, at least not in the same way men are. The lesser innovation ability is due to the way God programs female minds and how he programmed their DNA in my opinion, or God programmed them in general to me innovative at other things, like weaving, cleaning and visual design. For those who argue, “So God lets you rape virgins and you don’t have to pay for it?” I’d say you didn’t study the link or listen to the law if you read it and didn’t read or forgot the points I just made: Deuteronomy says he must be fined and stay with her for life as her husband. And how many times do you think anyone can get away with rape if they keep having to pay fines? The law also suggests that the rape victim has the full right to accuse the one who raped her of having raped her without penalty, unlike in the Quran, or Muslim law, or Muslim tradition, in which it’s a heavy and dangerous burden for a woman to accuse anyone of anything. And God, as Bible-haters know, who’ve bothered to study the Bible in general well, records every evil (and good) act a person does, and if a person isn’t forgiven of their sins – if Jesus hasn’t suffered and died for their past and future sins – they will pay the penalty of eternal pain, limited movement and limited company, forever, for every rape they committed, besides all their other sins.

Some idiotic and simpleton replies to the article I found, no doubt from liberals, were:

“No preconceived notions or bias, I’m sure.”

I thought someone would say that. So then is a homosexual automatically biased if he or she says, “Homosexuality is good” or finds that gay marriage is good or when they say that gay marriage is equal to straight marriage, or when a father of a raped 13 year old demands she kill the baby “so you can feel better”? Is it biased when a mainstream scientist, liberals who trust in them or atheists make claims in favor of the Big Bang, abiogenesis, Darwinian evolution, or anything in such a way that it says or implies that the Bible is false, that creationism is false, that intelligent design is false or that Christians are wrong for believing whatever Christ says, or anything at all, or that he even existed? It’s as dumb as saying that if a Counsel on Single Life did the study and found marriage was less beneficial than being single that they were biased too. The idiot is just speculating and it’s poor speculation since he’s merely judging by the name of the group that did the study.

Another liberal poop reply was, “I’m sure More proof that gay marriage would be beneficial to the same sex parented families.”

That’s as stupid as saying that if someone found “eating salmon raw is beneficial” that therefore eating Puffer fish/fugu raw was good too”. The moron liberal took the research out of context. It was on straight couples, not gay. And why did he capitalize “more”? Weird.

Related Information:

National Marriage Project Study Information
Are Married Parents Really Better for Children?
Rape in the Bible
A correlation between homosexuality and violence

‘Government Really Not Good at Keeping Secrets’ and Other Logical Fallacies of Skeptics

For the second time this week I’ve heard the logical fallacy that the (US) government has no secrets because it’s not good at keeping secrets. If that isn’t circular reasoning than what is? I just heard it repeated again on Coast to Coast AM by Ronald L. Mallett. The show edition is described by the Coast site as,

Time Travel
Date: 08-15-11
Host: George Noory
Guests: Ronald L. Mallett, Lauren Weinstein

Physics Professor Ronald Mallett will discuss his breakthrough research on time travel, as well as share an update on the latest in theoretical physics.

Ronald was responding to a caller who asked if the government was hiding a secret program on time travel. Ronald then immediately contradicted himself by saying, “Whatever the human mind can think of, it can and will achieve.” In other words: “IF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT CONCEIVES OF A WAY TO KEEP SECRETS THEN IT WILL SUCCESSFULLY DO SO.” So, once again, a non-Christian, a Mainstreamer Cultist severely contradicts himself in a breath without even realizing it, and if he did realize it, he should have corrected himself, but failed and allowed others to be deceived. Some might ask, “What does that matter?” It matters because it helps people to be gullible and naive that they can believe whatever the government says, which is utter nonsense. The statement that the government is bad at keeping secrets is also nonsensical in that it contradicts itself, because it’s implying to opposite things: that the government can’t do anything in secret, and the opposite: when it does do something in secret it’s exposed right away. That is what people mean but are vague. Vague as in, how long can’t the government keep a secret? Ronald made it clear, “really bad” at it, so, not long. But what is the evidence that the government can’t do so? That’s also a logical fallacy because it’s the same as saying, “I know that the government can’t keep a secret for long because because it can only do so for a short time because it’s bad at keeping secrets” but saying so without evidence. Ronald is claiming he knows all the secrets and therefore knows all the secret departments of the military, all military secrets, that none have been kept for long, like a year? (vague), everything said in secret by every individual apart of the government, including the FBI, CIA and NSA, and that even when they classify something as above top secret and make UFOs more secret than the atomic bomb (which the military stated it did do), that he would know soon. So then, China and every other country with spies in America must know all the secrets of our government, because it has none, or accidentally reveals it soon after. So can Ronald tell us what the secret craft are that the military has? Can he tell us what happened at Area 51 for the past 40 years? Can he tell us what crashed at Roswell?: Which story out of three conflicting ones that the military gave is correct? What are the names of the many Area 51 workers that are flown and bussed in to Area 51? What are the launch codes for all the nuclear missiles of the USA and what are the names of the ones who possess the launch keys? Ronald’s claim is also logically fallacious and arrogant in another way: he’s negating that any non-government person, no citizen, can find out about the secrets, and only the government and military would in their incompetence or by accident, or that some spy would reveal it (but not a citizen who is spying on behalf of some government like China). In other words: us stupid citizens are stupid, only government and the military is smart and wise, just not smart and wise enough to keep secrets from us… uh wait, but us stupid citizens can’t find out about their secrets because we’re stupid… and there is yet another contradiction from the Royal Mainstream Scientist Ronald Mallett, wannabe time traveler, who’s motivation for going back in time, according to his self-proclaimed Skeptic self, to see his dad again. Can anyone say “shallow”? How much more needs to be pointed out about the Mainstream cult to show that they are very bad at logic in general, and that also effects their effectiveness in scientific research, and therefore can’t be trusted with their fundamental(ist) claims: There was a Big Bang billions of years ago, we evolved from some simple creatures that were created by lightning hitting chemicals (able to reproduce and think and sense what was around them), and that after billions of years, turned into (super complex and much more intelligent animals and super intelligent) humans, with many characteristics (that can’t be reasonably explained without resorting to God as having designed us), and that aliens can’t get here, because… well one guest evolutionist this or last year, on Coast to Coast AM said because it would be too coincidental. And it would be too coincidental that they showed up during this time of our evolution. But why? If there are trillions of planets with possible life and some aliens evolved to become intelligent much sooner then us, then why wouldn’t there be any chance of “just another planet out of trillions” being visited by some alien out of those trillions? Mainstream scientists truly are confused and forgetful of what they study, ever learning and never able to reach the truth. I think that if they would stop obsessing on money and selfish and shallow desires they wouldn’t be so “scatter-brained” and forgetful.

I’ve also been noticing, that recently (others would probably say often) Noory has been asking really stupid questions. During the show he asked Mallet if the time travel he was working on would be MENTAL or physical. What the Hell kind of question is that? George was asking “is your time travel device going to be metaphysical and use spiritual time travel”, because the mind is a spiritual thing, it’s not material. That’s a fact by the way, you materialists, because awareness for example, which you must have a mind for, is not a physical thing, just as actions and information are not physical things. But Ronald Mallett obviously was not talking about a spiritual device or one that manipulated the mind. I wonder if George prepares questions long before the show starts. It doesn’t seem he does, otherwise his questions wouldn’t be so dumb. But, at least God lets me use them to teach profound, deep and useful things.

There was also something else that Ronald implied which is typical of how Mainstreamers, and which shows how their morality leads to things like the 500+ million people killed by atheists (not all atheists obviously): when he said that humans can achieve anything they can think of, he was answering the same caller I mentioned earlier who brought up a stupid example for his question, which was that Suparman’s dad said that going back in time was forbidden and so asked Ronald if God ever forbade it (how about read the Bible and study religion idiot, and ask a religious person and not a materialist Mainstreamer?). Ronald, besides saying humans could do whatever they wanted to, said that if we weren’t meant to do something, then God wouldn’t allow it. That answer implies that if child molestation happens and anything that is obviously evil, it’s good or permitted by God, because we were able to do it. That besides being evil reasoning, is also a logical fallacy: if you aren’t doing something then it can be said you aren’t meant to do anything that you aren’t doing. So then it’s also contradictory. And Ronald was implying that to know if something is permitted by God, you should do it, and he surely meant that, because he also said in his answer, and I’m paraphrasing this part till I can listen again to what he said, that it was wrong to not learn and progress.

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. – Romans 8:28

Ethiopia’s Nazi Government Starves Own Citizens to Death

Here is a repost of an 11 day old news report from the UK by Watch Angus Stickler of the BBC

Ethiopia ‘using aid as weapon of oppression’
8/5/2011 12:48 UK/11:48 GMT

A joint undercover investigation by BBC Newsnight and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that the Ethiopian government is using billions of dollars of development aid as a tool for political oppression.

Posing as tourists the team of journalists travelled to the southern region of Ethiopia.

We are just waiting on the crop, if we have one meal a day we will survive until the harvest, beyond that there is no hope for us
Villager in southern Ethiopia

There they found villages where whole communities are starving, having allegedly been denied basic food, seed and fertiliser for failing to support Prime Minister Meles Zenawi.

The investigation has also gathered evidence of mass detentions, the widespread use of torture and extra-judicial killings by Ethiopian government forces.

Yet Western donors including Britain – which is the third largest donor to Ethiopia – stand accused of turning a blind eye by continuing to provide aid money despite being warned about the abuses.

The aid in question is long-term development aid, not the emergency aid provided in response to the current drought in Ethiopia and its neighbours in the Horn of Africa.

Government response

Ambassador Abdirashid Dulane, the Deputy Head of Ethiopia’s UK Mission, has rejected the allegations saying that the Newsnight/Bureau report “lacked objectivity, even-handedness”.

“The sole source of the story was opponents of Ethiopia who have been rejected by the electorate, and time and again it has been shown that their allegations are unfounded”.

Our reporters visited one village in southern Ethiopia with a population of about 1,700 adults.

Despite being surrounded by other communities which are well fed and prosperous, this village, which cannot be named for fear of reprisals, is starving. We were told that in the two weeks prior to our team’s arrival five adults and 10 children had died.

Lying on the floor, too exhausted to stand, and flanked by her three-year-old son whose stomach is bloated by malnutrition, one woman described how her family had not eaten for four days.

“We are living day to day on the grace of God,” she said.

Another three-year-old boy lay in his grandmother’s lap, listless and barely moving as he stared into space.

“We are just waiting on the crop, if we have one meal a day we will survive until the harvest, beyond that there is no hope for us,” the grandmother said.

‘Abandoned’

In another village 30 km (19 miles) away it was a similar story.

Almost all of the aid goes through the government channels… in terms of relief food supply and some of the safety net provisions, they simply don’t get to the needy of an equitably basis

There our team met Yenee, a widow who along with her seven children is surviving by begging, eating leaves and scavenging scraps from the bins in the nearest town.

“The situation is desperate,” she said. “We have been abandoned… It is a matter of chance if we live or die.”

The two villages sit just 15km (9 miles) either side of a major town, surrounded by other communities where the populations are well fed and healthy. They are in desperate need, but no-one is helping.

According to local opposition members they are being punished for failing to vote for the ruling party, the Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), which Mr Meles leads.

Further north a group of farmers alienated by Mr Meles’ government met the BBC/Bureau team at a secret location on the edge of a remote village.

One farmer described how he had been ostracised for failing to support EPRDF: “Because of our political views we face great intimidation. We are denied the right to fertiliser and seeds because of political ideology,” he said.

‘Buying support’

The Ethiopian federal and regional governments control the distribution of aid in Ethiopia.

Professor Beyene Petros, the current vice-chairman of the Ethiopian Federal Democratic Forum, an alliance of eight opposition parties known as Medrek, told our reporters that aid is not distributed according to need, but according to support for the EPRDF:

“Almost all of the aid goes through the government channels… in terms of relief food supply and some of the safety net provisions, they simply don’t get to the needy of an equitably basis.

“There is a great deal of political differentiation. People who support the ruling party, the EPRDF, and our members are treated differently. The motivation is buying support, that is how they recruit support, holding the population hostage,” he said.

Mr Beyene said that the international community, including the British government, is well aware of the problem and that he has personally presented them with evidence:

“The position of the donor communities is dismissive… they always want to dismiss it as an isolated incident when we present them with some proof. And we challenge them to go down and check it out for themselves, but they don’t do it.”

Accountability

The UK International Development Minister Stephen O’Brien issued a statement in response to the allegations raised by the investigation, saying:

“We take all allegations of human rights abuses extremely seriously and raise them immediately with the relevant authorities including the Ethiopian Government, with whom we have a candid relationship. Where there is evidence, we take firm and decisive action.

They raped me in a room, one of them was standing on my mouth, and one tied my hand, they were taking turns, I fainted during this – Ethiopian woman from the Ogaden – continued here

Jobs First? What Should Be Most Important For a President?

The U.S. Unemployment Rate From 1980-2011 (from Reagan to Obama). A bar graph version by months, from the end of World War 2 (1948) to 6/2011 can be seen here (the original link no longer works, so I just linked to the home page of the site of the linked no longer existing page).

I was listening to radio station 100.5 FM (KXNT) this morning, and at about 8:30 heard some guest on the morning show from Nevada say, “Job’s is the most important thing… If that’s not your number one priority as president of the United States, you better get out of the race.” No, that’s not the most important thing. What matters most is a having a moral president who loves God and can communicate correctly, a president who won’t pander or compromise. A leader without morals and who cannot communicate correctly is a corrupt and worthless leader, which is one of the reasons why Nevada is one of the most corrupt states and has over 12% of its residents unemployed. Is what was important for Adolph Hitler simply having any job? Was he appropriate to be Germany’s ruler? And of course, wisdom is also the most important for people to have, because without it you will have less of a chance of getting a job, doing a job well or better than others, keeping it or getting a better job. Knowledge of course is also important, without it you can’t be wise or “grow in wisdom.”

So what a president should do, is help the nation to to turn to God, so that they won’t stay corrupt and can be moral and stay that way, and to help those already turned to be more obedient (moral) till they are perfected. Everything else comes second. Though some say that you can’t promote a particular religion because of “the law” (the law of the founders), a president can do what I just said by pointing out what is logical and what religions DON’T follow the rules of logic and use a certain symbol to point out what religion that leaves left. Those with wisdom will be able to figure out what he or she is pointing to. In that way, the law of man will not be broken and wisdom will be spread.

On a related subject, Michele Bachmann was being hypocritical when she explained away her comment that wives should be submissive to their husbands by saying she meant “respect”. She clearly didn’t mean that, but meant what the Bible said. But because she lacked wisdom, and was afraid of persecution from the world (which includes liberals and Christian-hating “Skeptics”) and did not trust in God for that moment, pandered to the world, and made herself look weak and hypocritical to those who know what the Bible says about family and government. What she should have said was that she was right to say what she did, but that as a President she would not have to make political decisions based on what he husband wanted because he would not be the President, but on personal matters she would still be under his leadership. This is common sense: If a king died the queen, if there was one, would be in charge of the Kingdom unless she was too young, she would not have to submit to men merely because she was a female, or else every man would be the ruler of the kingdom and could tell her what to do, which would lead to conflicting commands. It would be simpler if she ruled till she found another husband. And if she gave authority to her son when she was still in her right mind and healthy, that would also be unseemly, because the mother is the head of the son (unless he is Christ).

“There is an evil which I have seen under the sun, an error which comes forth because of [godless] fear of a ruler: Folly is set

Folly is set in great dignity and the noble seated in the lowly place. I have seen servants upon horses and princess walking as servants upon the earth.” – Ecclesiastes 10:5

At Gibeon Yahweh appeared to Solomon during the night in a dream, and God said, “Ask for whatever you want me to give you.” Solomon answered, “…I am only a little child and do not know how to carry out my duties. Your servant is here among the people you have chosen, a great people, too numerous to count or number. So give your servant a discerning heart to govern your people and to distinguish between right and wrong. For who is able to govern this great people of yours?” The Lord was pleased that Solomon had asked for this. So God said to him, “Since you have asked for this and not for long life or wealth for yourself, nor have asked for the death of your enemies but for discernment in administering justice, I will do what you have asked. I will give you a wise and discerning heart, so that there will never have been anyone like you, nor will there ever be. Moreover, I will give you what you have not asked for—both wealth and honor—so that in your lifetime you will have no equal among kings.” – 1 Kings 3:5,7-13

“If you do whatever I command you and walk in obedience to me and do what is right in my eyes by obeying my decrees and commands, as David my servant did, I will be with you.” – 1 Kings 11:38

“If you ever forget Yahweh your God and follow other gods and worship and bow down to them, I testify against you today that you will surely be destroyed. Like the nations Yahweh destroyed before you, so you will be destroyed for not obeying Yahweh your God.” – Deuteronomy 8:19-20

“You cannot serve both God and money. Therefore I tell you, don’t worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothes? Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? Can any one of you by worrying add a single hour to your life? And why do you worry about clothes? See how the flowers of the field grow. They do not labor or spin. Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these. If that is how God clothes the grass of the field, which is here today and tomorrow is thrown into the fire, will he not much more clothe you—you of little faith? So do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. But first seek his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you too. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.” – Matthew 6:24-34

The Cult of the Demon Ramtha, Refuted

I was listening to Coast to Coast again, this edition described as,

Channeling Ramtha
Sun 08-14

Guest host Rob Simone (email) was joined by founder and President of Ramtha’s School of Enlightenment, JZ Knight, for a discussion about her experiences connected with the channeling of a 35,000 year old warrior from the lost continent of Atlantis, called Ramtha.

According to Wickedpedia, “Judy Zebra Knight (born Judith Darlene Hampton on March 16, 1946, in Roswell, New Mexico), usually known as JZ Knight, is an American mystic teacher and author. She is also the reputed channel of a spiritual entity named Ramtha. Knight has appeared on US TV shows, such as Larry King,[1] MSNBC[2] and The Merv Griffin Show, offering spiritual insight and inspiration. Her teachings have attracted figures from the entertainment and political world such as Linda Evans and Shirley MacLaine.[3] Knight claims to bridge ancient wisdom and the power of consciousness together with the latest discoveries in science.[4] Some of the ideas are similar to those of Shirley MacLaine,[5] which have in turn been criticized for being “kindergarten metaphysics” by mathematician and skeptic Martin Gardner.[6]

So, I listened to JZ Knight, an obvious liberal from what I heard, who seems to allow herself to be possessed by a demon, and I noted some severely ironic contradictions she made on the show, which some may find funny. I got the impression that host Rob thought she was a liar, because at one point he said that a psychologist (as in any) would label her “a nut” for saying what she did, and asked how she knew she wasn’t being possessed by a demon. Those two things the host, George Noory, has and probably never would say to any guest, unless they were a fundamentalist Christian, at least not in the way Rob put it. George tries not to offend anyone except those oh so bad fundamentalists who try and force everyone to have babies and believe the Bible so that they can rule the world, a book which says not to steal, murder or lie or “Lord it” over anyone, to help the needy with money, not the rich and that both should share if they can, and to seek the truth will all your heart, to be quick to listen and slow to speak and anger, to not show partiality and hate all such immoral things and not to listen to anyone who lives life doing those things, and that those who do live like that and listen to people like that she die and go to Hell forever… A great book to use if you want to deceive and dominate the world right? Moving on.

JZ reminded me of another popular liar, much more popular (because he uses “God” to endorse his babble), who allegedly wrote, “Conversations With God : An Uncommon Dialogue”. That liar’s name i Neale Donald Walsch. I call him a liar because I found that he made severe contradictions in his claims about humans and God. I don’t call someone a liar for nothing. But back to JZ: Rob asked if she or her followers went out and preached, and she told an utter lie, which was that she didn’t “prosetize” or said in some incorrect way like that, contradicted by the fact that she moves around and leaves her house and lets the demon Ramtha speak through her! And was on the show preaching about her religion, which she also claimed wasn’t religion, though it obviously was, since those following Ramtha allow it to take control of their lives and want it to in order to “ascend”. She didn’t say ascend on the show but knowing these types of cults I’m sure she’s used it before. Demons like Ramtha are called “ascended Masters”. The concept was used heavily in Stargate, an atheistic sci-fi series. How can someone say they aren’t attempting to get anyone to follow their way of life when they are emphatically endorsing it and putting religion in a bad light? She said that in the ancient times people would listen to prophets, but then religion got mixed into it, as if that were a bad thing. Why would it be a bad thing? Is simply listening going to get you anywhere if you don’t apply the truths you here? If you don’t live them? Blind ignorants and liars who hate truth, like forget and don’t want to learn that that is what TRUE religion is, as opposed to human-invented rituals and reasonless parroting like Catholicism, Mormonism and Jehovah’s Witnessism.

She also said on the show, “it’s about free will” then almost right after said, “we’re predestined”. This is very strange since most people, except Calvinists, would say that that is a contradiction. Near the end of the show she was asked by Rob Simone if it was true that (according to her x-Catholic friend, who left Catholicism “for Ramntha”) that Ramntha was in a UFO which shined a beam on the Holy of Holies which is what tore it when Jesus died. She replied, “I wouldn’t know, I’m not here when Ramtha speaks.” What happened to free will!? And doesn’t this person record, or anyone else, what she says when she babbles supposed ultimate truths or truths that lead to it?! And no one writes it down even!? Not even about what happened in the time of the perfect one Jesuss!? WOW! How worthless Ramtha’s words must be if the very whom the spirit “master” of the truth speaks through is ignored by her! And how is it she said that if she repeates other things Ramtha’s said to her? And how can you endorse your cult if you don’t know what it is your cult leader says!? AAAAAHHHH!!!!! Liberals are so frustrating! Frustrating because they claim to have the truth and living free while bashing truth and twisting the meaning of freedom and accusing those who point out that they do that with condemnation, that they are the ones who do that! In other words, frustrating because they are hypocrites claiming to be honest accusing the honest of being hypocrites. The worst ones are the ones who are conniving to those who point out there errors, who point it out to help them.

When the host asked if it was true that she believed that she was being spied on at some point, she replied as if preparing to lie, “If I personally believed that?” and then the host seemed to think he accidentally threw her a hard ball (oh no, can’t ask tough questions to clearly deluded people who wreck lives can we?), and changed what he said by asking if she or others (apart of her cult) thought that. And she said she was sure, and that it was the CIA and knew this because of remote viewer who was amazed to have finally been with her. It was a remote viewer who was on Coast to Coast AM a few times I think, becacuse the host repeated his name in a way like he was well-known. She then said absurd things like that everyone was being spied on, and therefore, she said, “it’s not like we’re really free… it’s like we’re in a bubble… in a great experiment… but they can’t control your mind, if you realize you have one” and that the CIA monitors YOUR EVERY WORD, yes, all of them, and that evidence of this is that they can read the letters of a dime with a satellite, basically a rant reply. So, a cult leader JZ, who for some strange reason doesn’t know what her leader Ramtha teaches, while teaching what Ramtha teaches, he says that we have free will while being trapped in a bubble-like world and therefore aren’t really free [because the CIA will stop you or hurt you for it?!] unless you realize you have a mind [a poor way of saying free will that allows you to do whatever you want to?]. But that’s not all of the incredible infant-talk by this woman at 65 years of age she said with a depressed tone, who has been leading her cult for 36 years: she said in set-up-knock-down fashion, “I just make up my own reality.”…

The sins of some are obvious, reaching the place of judgment ahead of them; the sins of others trail behind them. – 1 Timothy 5:24

Related Posts:

Demons Pretending to Be Angels and the Free Will Heresy

The Riddle of Responsibility: Why Does God Consider Us Responsible For What We Do?

Another Strange Synchronicity: Friday Nights

A very strange coincidence happened to me this morning: I was writing down the lyrics to a song to find out what song it was, “it’s Friday night” (and “Friday night” seemed to be the theme of the song) and about two minutes later some man on the radio said that a teacher said to her students that the most important day was Friday and that she used it for studying rather than partying, I think she meant when she wasn’t a teacher, but a student. I tried figuring out what the radio discussion was about, like if it was a guy selling some book, but it got boring and I zoned out while working on my laptop. I did record it though, but missed the repeated comments he made about the importance of Friday. The song I’ve found out was called, “Last Friday Night” aka “T.G.I.F” by Katy Perry.

Related Post:

11:11, Synchronicities and Evidence of Intelligent Design

Hastings: London Rioters Were Liberals, Dalrymple: Bankers Spawned Corrupt Britons

Years of liberal dogma have spawned a generation of amoral, uneducated, welfare dependent, brutalised youngsters
By Max Hastings
8/10/2011/12:49 PM

A few weeks after the U.S. city of Detroit was ravaged by 1967 race riots in which 43 people died, I was shown around the wrecked areas by a black reporter named Joe Strickland.

He said: ‘Don’t you believe all that stuff people here are giving media folk about how sorry they are about what happened. When they talk to each other, they say: “It was a great fire, man!” ’

I am sure that is what many of the young rioters, black and white, who have burned and looted in England through the past few shocking nights think today.

It was fun. It made life interesting. It got people to notice them. As a girl looter told a BBC reporter, it showed ‘the rich’ and the police that ‘we can do what we like’.

If you live a normal life of absolute futility, which we can assume most of this week’s rioters do, excitement of any kind is welcome. The people who wrecked swathes of property, burned vehicles and terrorised communities have no moral compass to make them susceptible to guilt or shame.

Most have no jobs to go to or exams they might pass. They know no family role models, for most live in homes in which the father is unemployed, or from which he has decamped.
They are illiterate and innumerate, beyond maybe some dexterity with computer games and BlackBerries.

They are essentially wild beasts. I use that phrase advisedly, because it seems appropriate to young people bereft of the discipline that might make them employable; of the conscience that distinguishes between right and wrong.

They respond only to instinctive animal impulses — to eat and drink, have sex, seize or destroy the accessible property of others. – More here

British rioters the spawn of a bankrupt ruling elite
By Theodore Dalrymple
8/11/2011/12:00AM

THE riots in London and elsewhere in Britain are a backhanded tribute to the long-term intellectual torpor, moral cowardice, incompetence and careerist opportunism of the British political and intellectual class.

They have somehow managed not to notice what has long been apparent to anyone who has taken a short walk with his eyes open down any frequented British street: that a considerable proportion of the country’s young population (a proportion that is declining) is ugly, aggressive, vicious, badly educated, uncouth and criminally inclined.

Unfortunately, while it is totally lacking in self-respect, it is full of self-esteem: that is to say, it believes itself entitled to a high standard of living, and other things, without any effort on its own part.

Consider for a moment the following: although youth unemployment in Britain is very high, that is to say about 20 per cent of those aged under 25, the country has had to import young foreign labour for a long time, even for unskilled work in the service sector.

The reasons for this seeming paradox are obvious to anyone who knows young Britons as I do.

No sensible employer in a service industry would choose a young Briton if he could have a young Pole; the young Pole is not only likely to have a good work ethic and refined manners, he is likely to be able to add up and — most humiliating of all — to speak better English than the Briton, at least if by that we mean the standard variety of the language. He may not be more fluent but his English will be more correct and his accent easier to understand. – more here

Related Posts:

Liberals love child porn
UK Government Rules Fundamentalists May Not Adopt Children
UK To Enforce Anti-Extremism Laws

Socialist Psycopath Israeli Government Sues Bedouins For Having to Oppress Them

[Socialist] Israel[is] to bill Bedouins for razing their homes
7-28-2011

JERUSALEM (AFP) — Israeli authorities are suing residents of a makeshift Bedouin village for the cost of repeatedly evicting them and razing “illegal structures” where they live, an official said on Wednesday.

“They built about 40 structures there for which they have no [building] rights,” Israel Land Administration spokeswoman Ortal Tzabar told AFP.

“They have already invaded the site more than 20 times, putting up huts and buildings and it costs us, for policemen and bulldozers and manpower, a huge amount.”

“We added it up and found that the cost of evictions so far is 1.8 million shekels [$529,400],” she said.

A lawsuit for that amount was filed on Tuesday in a court in Beersheba, the capital of southern Israel’s Negev desert region, where the Bedouin village of Al-Araqib, which is not recognized by Israeli authorities, regularly rises and falls.

An Israeli non-governmental group, Bedouin-Jewish Justice, reported in March that the homes there had been destroyed and rebuilt 21 times since July 2010. – More here

For the Sake of the Desert

This is not a prophecy God have given to me to speak, but I imagine, if God were to tell me to say something to Israel at this time, that it would be this:

You complain to your leaders about the price of your housing while your kin complain about having no housing at all. So then, if you pray to be able to afford your houses, should I listen? Did I not tell you to treat strangers as you want to be treated, to love your neighbor as yourself? To not forget how the Egyptians oppressed you, oppressed you in that fiery furnace, making bricks for their houses? Did I not tell you to treat strangers with kindness because you know what it was like to be oppressed as strangers in a strange land? But what have you done to your kin in the desert, a dry place with hot and cold extremes, and little to eat and drink?: You’ve watched your neighbors, your kin, the Bedouins, ground into the dust and removed from a home which was no home. Your rulers, whom you elected, would not begrudge these homeless wanderers a life in a tent, in the desert, their goats feeding on weeds. And after they drove them to the edge of the desert, they again took away their homes and oppressed the poor, the orphan and the widow. They would not even begrudge them a poor home, while enjoy their pleasant and comfortable ones. They would not even begrudge them gardens. And why? “For the sake of the desert,” they said. If for the sake of the desert, why destroy their gardens? Why destroy their farms? So then, should you complain when you cannot afford your good houses or gardens? Go and beg other countries for money, who will help you? How much longer will you get money from Americans? Beg them since they themselves are becoming poorer and poorer. You will beg them since they will begrudge you homes. Since you have said to your own kin who were at peace with you and doing you no harm, “for the sake of the desert we drove you and your goats out from it,” only to relentlessly destroy their homes and gardens and diminish their goats to a remnant; I too will raise your homes to the ground for the sake of the desert and give you no peace even when beg for it. And as a vineyard is gone over many times, so that only a few grapes are left on the vine, so I will go over my vineyard Israel many times, so that only a remnant of my sheep remain. For the sake of my promise to Abraham and the sake of desert, I will do this, and deprive you of the pools of water and forests I will make, in my wilderness, the Negev.

Related Information:

Culture of the Egyptian Bedouins
Egypt’s Bedouins begin to demand equal citizenship rights
Bedouins Allege Oppression from the Egyptian Government Against Them (Video)

Israel’s Housing Crisis
Why Israeli’s Can’t Afford Houses

Deuteronomy 15:9-11
Be careful not to harbor this wicked thought: “The seventh year, the year for canceling debts, is near,” so that you do not show ill will toward the needy among your fellow Israelites and give them nothing. They may then appeal to Yahweh against you, and you will be found guilty of sin. Give generously to them and do so without a grudging heart; then because of this Yahweh your God will bless you in all your work and in everything you put your hand to. There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be openhanded toward your fellow Israelites who are poor and needy in your land.

2 Chronicles 6:32-34
“As for the foreigner who does not belong to your people Israel but has come from a distant land because of your great name and your mighty hand and your outstretched arm—when they come and pray toward this temple, then hear from heaven, your dwelling place. Do whatever the foreigner asks of you, so that all the peoples of the earth may know your name and fear you, as do your own people Israel, and may know that this house I have built bears your Name.”

Exodus 22:21
“Do not mistreat or oppress a foreigner, for you were foreigners in Egypt.”

Exodus 23:9
“Do not oppress a foreigner; you yourselves know how it feels to be foreigners, because you were foreigners in Egypt.”

Leviticus 19:34
“The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am Yahweh your God.”

Leviticus 25:23
“The land must not be sold permanently, because the land is mine and you reside in my land as foreigners and strangers.”

Leviticus 26:3-6, 14-45, NIV
“If you follow my decrees and are careful to obey my commands, I will send you rain in its season, and the ground will yield its crops and the trees their fruit. 5 Your threshing will continue until grape harvest and the grape harvest will continue until planting, and you will eat all the food you want and live in safety in your land. I will grant peace in the land, and you will lie down and no one will make you afraid. …

But if you will not listen to me and carry out all these commands, and if you reject my decrees and abhor my laws and fail to carry out all my commands and so violate my covenant, then I will do this to you: I will bring on you sudden terror, wasting diseases and fever that will destroy your sight and sap your strength. You will plant seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it. I will set my face against you so that you will be defeated by your enemies; those who hate you will rule over you, and you will flee even when no one is pursuing you.

If after all this you will not listen to me, I will punish you for your sins seven times over. I will break down your stubborn pride and make the sky above you like iron and the ground beneath you like bronze. Your strength will be spent in vain, because your soil will not yield its crops, nor will the trees of your land yield their fruit.

If you remain hostile toward me and refuse to listen to me, I will multiply your afflictions seven times over, as your sins deserve. I will send wild animals against you, and they will rob you of your children, destroy your cattle and make you so few in number that your roads will be deserted.

If in spite of these things you do not accept my correction but continue to be hostile toward me, I myself will be hostile toward you and will afflict you for your sins seven times over. And I will bring the sword on you to avenge the breaking of the covenant. When you withdraw into your cities, I will send a plague among you, and you will be given into enemy hands. When I cut off your supply of bread, ten women will be able to bake your bread in one oven, and they will dole out the bread by weight. You will eat, but you will not be satisfied.

If in spite of this you still do not listen to me but continue to be hostile toward me, then in my anger I will be hostile toward you, and I myself will punish you for your sins seven times over. You will eat the flesh of your sons and the flesh of your daughters. I will destroy your high places, cut down your incense altars and pile your dead bodies on the lifeless forms of your idols, and I will abhor you. I will turn your cities into ruins and lay waste your sanctuaries, and I will take no delight in the pleasing aroma of your offerings. I myself will lay waste the land, so that your enemies who live there will be appalled. I will scatter you among the nations and will draw out my sword and pursue you. Your land will be laid waste, and your cities will lie in ruins. Then the land will enjoy its sabbath years all the time that it lies desolate and you are in the country of your enemies; then the land will rest and enjoy its sabbaths. All the time that it lies desolate, the land will have the rest it did not have during the sabbaths you lived in it.

As for those of you who are left, I will make their hearts so fearful in the lands of their enemies that the sound of a windblown leaf will put them to flight. They will run as though fleeing from the sword, and they will fall, even though no one is pursuing them. They will stumble over one another as though fleeing from the sword, even though no one is pursuing them. So you will not be able to stand before your enemies. 38 You will perish among the nations; the land of your enemies will devour you. Those of you who are left will waste away in the lands of their enemies because of their sins; also because of their ancestors’ sins they will waste away.

But if they will confess their sins and the sins of their ancestors—their unfaithfulness and their hostility toward me, which made me hostile toward them so that I sent them into the land of their enemies—then when their uncircumcised hearts are humbled and they pay for their sin, I will remember my covenant with Jacob and my covenant with Isaac and my covenant with Abraham, and I will remember the land. 43 For the land will be deserted by them and will enjoy its sabbaths while it lies desolate without them. They will pay for their sins because they rejected my laws and abhorred my decrees. Yet in spite of this, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them or abhor them so as to destroy them completely, breaking my covenant with them. I am Yahweh their God. But for their sake I will remember the covenant with their ancestors whom I brought out of Egypt in the sight of the nations to be their God. I am Yahweh.”

Reasons Why ETs Won’t Help or Converse With Us, In the Way We Desire

Post link: http://alienminds.tk

This post may seem crude and the points not entirely separated into distinct points, but I think it’s got some good points that can be learned regardless of how nice and neat this article or whatever you want to call it is:

An Analysis of Extraterrestrials and UFOs

In the context of a Biblical reality, there is nothing that would exclude the possibility of extraterrestrials, or even other beings made in God’s image. The Bible does not teach that mankind will rule over the universe, nor that any of the individuals among them will, or that any of them will rule over angels. It therefore remains a possibility that aliens will govern themselves if they exist, and angels will govern their own kind,

The evidence that extraterrestrials are not all demons is great.

1) Traditionally, as is known from endless accounts of ghosts, demons, when they manifest them usually do so in ways so that it’s reasonable to argue that what was seen was demonic. The most obvious is when an ethereal being is harassing someone, ethereal as in can be seen through, looks like mist, takes on the vague shape of a human or an animal, or even distinct, but then suddenly disappears or goes through a wall. They also act in ways that seem hostile, unfriendly, malicious, and cold. How many pictures are there of alleged human spirits smiling? How many looking friendly, or giving a nice message, like, “We love you,” or “Go with Christ,” or “Follow the five precepts of Buddha” even? But finding a creepy picture or video of a demon, aka ghost, is easy. It’s not friendly to rock a chair in front of someone, especially in an unnatural way, like very fast, or very slow, or intermittently as if the person sitting in it was trying to annoy or was insane, which are the types of phenomenon associated with ghosts/demons. UFOs and aliens are rarely if ever hostile, and rather than annoying, put on amazing shows. Demons also often make it easy to capture their sick behavior up close, UFOs however often do things without the concern of allowing themselves to be easily recorded. A good example of this is ones that can be seen using powerful night vision, at night, and which appear to be dozens or hundreds of miles up in the sky. Why would Satan be imitating aliens up so far where the only ones who can see them are a few military people with radar? On top of that, it’s known that UFOs often don’t show up on radar.

2) Some think aliens and UFOs and the things aliens say are a Satanic deception. However accounts and observation of videos show that aliens and UFOs act like tourists, excited teens, humorous adults, and biologists and geologists who are interested in learning things. There is rarely, very rarely, if ever, a moral message from them. At best they show a scary scene of a city being wrecked, or some larger areas. I know of no messages like, “Go with Jesus,” or “The Bible is good” or “bad”, or “Buddha was a genius” or “LGBT is awesome, support gay marriage, don’t discriminate against the LGBTs” or “be vegetarian” or any liberal or Christian comments like that. Even if it were so, they sure are poor at getting their messages out! How hard would it be for a UFO to transform into a bling and flash the message, “The Bible is only partly right” or “The Bible is about love, God loves you, do as you will but do no harm” like a Wiccan might say? or “The Bible is too violent, just do what you want but harm no one” as a Wiccan might also say? But no, instead, like visitors, they occasionally put on a show, as if to say, “Hi, you’re not alone, we see you and are interested in you and have no bad intentions.” Or simply, “We find you interesting, here’s even a glimpse of us even for you who are hateful.” Or some might say it’s also an indirect way of saying, “Yes, there really is other life, Roswell and other events that your governments try to hide have happened.” But demons on the other hand, through psychics or possession, are known for sometimes giving direct messages concerning morality or that can lead someone astray from the truths of the Bible. For example many people voice their confusion or wondering over how the Bible can be true if non-Christians, when they die, are still floating around Earth, miserable, or allegedly happy, or free to live as they please. Or they say they are confused because people are apparently reincarnated which contradicts the Bible, or show the Bible is not reliable (reincarnation can easily be dismissed as demon possession or false memories implanted by demons). But are aliens or UFOs known for creating false memories? Rather aliens are known for attempting, often, hide that they’ve abducted a person. In the case of the ones that kill cows, it’s been found that the cows have been doped with a calming chemical, L-tryptophan if I remember right, which is evidence that the person or persons killing them are concerned about the animals’ mental well-being, and that they don’t want the animals to feel pain or to be traumatized. But Satan could care less right? Is Satan someone who is concerned with the well being of anyone other that his fellow rebel angels? Satan hates humans, and there is no sign he has any love for animals either, since the humans he poisons often end up abusing animals. It seems God is allowing us to get a very good understanding of why aliens come here, through the repeated experiments they do. Some “skeptics” claim that it makes no sense that if they had the ability to get here that they’d be using crude tools, like probes, but they are assuming these tools are crude and that the level of technology needed to get to Earth is equal to being able to do medical examinations or experiments WITHOUT material objects (which is nonsensical since they need them to travel) or tools so advanced they can’t even conceive of them, which also makes no sense since if you can’t conceive of it then how can you rule out a probe you can’t see or examine? It also assumes that aliens have unlimited resources or no sense of nostalgia, or that they could simulate a cut or scratch on human skin without the instrument to do so. For example if an alien was curious to see what would happen to human skin if cut, what would they do it with? An anti-gravity powered laser? A nuclear-powered rocket scalpel with fancy lights all over it? No, if they were sane they’d just use a little knife or some sharp thing. I’ve also heard the argument that UFOs wouldn’t have dials like some have claimed, but again that assumes every alien in the universe has the same technology, unlimited resources, that they all live in the same environment and situation so that they’d all be using LED panels, and that everything has to be smooth and beautiful without knobs or dials or levers anywhere. But that’s a design philosophy and one that assumes all situations, including technology, is the same everywhere in the universe, including that all aliens have had the same rate of technological development, and all have the same design-philosophies. Mainstream scientists and Skeptics forget that asteroids can hit planets, and it shouldn’t be surprising to them then that many aliens have had their home planet or others they’ve colonized that were hit so hard that it was a great technological setback to them, and heavily damaged their economy. So, that all aliens aren’t all or always using gloriously high technology should not be surprising. North Korea is a good example of alternate tech philosophy due to their poverty, due to their bad atheist government: they use “outdated” technology as some might say, like vacuum tubes as opposed to solid state devices in their military craft, but do so as a low cost way of making them resistant to an EMP attack, solar flares or the EMP blast that would result from a nuclear missile strike. It’s cheap and it works. Aliens who use levers and dials might do so because they are a simple and easily repairable back up way of controlling their ships, as opposed to touch screen panels. On earth are much more expensive then typical keyboards, and there’s no reason it would be any different on any other planet since the laws of physics are the same everywhere. It may also be that some aliens on the same planet, just like here, are less wealthy then others, and so can only afford to make ships at a certain technological level, or, their ship was damaged during their journey, and not having the time or energy to repair their consoles, modified them so that they were simpler, knobs, levers and dials, and if they had enough time, could do so in a way so that you wouldn’t notice that it wasn’t originally designed that way.

3) The behavior of aliens, which is their very limited interaction with us, also indicates that there is agreement among them to mainly observe us. Even if aliens are abducting thousands each year, that’s a very small amount of people compared to the number being born, aborted, and murdered, and who are known to have been kidnapped by humans. A lot of missing persons are children, and not say, a famous lab worker or someone whose skill is needed to make some cold fusion device on the verge of changing humanity, so it’s easily argued that even abducting thousands of children each year, and not returning them, is not interference, figuratively. Demons however are known for giving lengthy messages when possessing people, or through automatic writing, or many, though burst-like, messages on tape and digital recording devices. Aliens don’t. At best they only talk to you when no one else is around, and allegedly when you’re no longer near Earth. Demons also sometimes will talk to you when you use Ouija Board, but aliens and UFOs are not known to be associated with those devices. None are reported suddenly showing up when someone uses an OB, no one sees a UFO suddenly appear out there window, and no one thinks to ask such a thing, which can be taken as evidence that demons are as separate from aliens and UFOs as humans as we are from demons. Even the most evil humans known don’t have the ability to walk through walls, make themselves invisible, suddenly disappear without any understandable way of doing so, or other supernatural things.

4) Demons are not known, not on the ground level at least, to make UFO-like phenomenon. At best they make ghost lamps and little balls of light, and at the most are responsible for the Brown Mountain Lights, which might however be angelic. The Brown Mountain Lights rarely if ever come close to looking like UFOs. There also have not been any reported ghost planes, which if Satan was able to do, you’d think he would, but it is apparent that God is limiting Satan greatly to the ground level, which in a way, matches what God said he would do to him in Genesis, though speaking to the father of snakes, which is that he would lick the dust of the earth all his life. Clearly that message wasn’t just meant for the snake that allowed Satan to use it, but to Satan as well. The Bible does call Satan the prince of the air, but that can easily mean Satan has great speed, is like the wind, which the Bible likens angels as, and in a way, is everywhere. He and his servants are clearly able to hover, in human terms, and to travel above the height of humans, but, as can be argued, can’t do much up in the sky except to do his usual emotional manipulations of people who are there, while traveling around in planes or whatever type of vehicle.

5) Aliens show a superb control over their emotions: no alien is known for attempting to conquer any place on Earth or taking revenge on humans on behalf of others it thinks were wronged. And the the only debatable time that happened, maybe, was in Mexico, when Quetzalcoatl came to power, but the evidence that he was an alien is very debatable. There is also the account of a man named Antonio, a farmer, who claimed he was raped by a female alien (this happened decades ago), and no other report is like it except for women who claim to be impregnated by aliens via instruments. There is also the Mothman alien, and Spring-heeled jack, who caused terror, and one I heard on Coast to Coast AM of some aliens who showed up in a forest, bizarre-looking ones, and banged on the window of a cabin, and left soon after. And perhaps, there was one that terrorized a few times some people in California who were in their car, leaving scratch marks on it. It may have been an unknown type of humanoid animal however, like the one in South Carolina, “lizardman” that did the same thing to a car. And there is also the case of the beings that repeatedly come to Dorothy Izat and her daughter, whose behavior to me, strongly suggests that they are demons. I say that Becacuse her daughter is often visited by small transparent orbs (small visible spheres are strongly tied into demonic activity in some houses) and Dorothy has said that she has seen shadowy figures some times, but didn’t say she saw any UFOs at the time. She was also given narcissistic messages from some beings who told her she was singled out for a great gift (which she still hasn’t received despite this happening for decades and her being in old age). She also seems to imply that they told her that the light from their ships is the light that gave life to humans (and Dorothy is supposedly a devout Catholic) and said it herself, as if it were true that light was needed to give us life. Yet the Bible doesn’t imply this, only that light is needed to help sustain the life we are given, life which came by God breathing into us, perhaps meaning giving us a soul, which the Bible says is required for the body to live. These visitors of Dorothy also do things that are not typical of aliens, which is to almost regularly show their UFOs, even upclose. It may be however that Satan is trying to muddy the situation, so that though aliens are indeed appearing to Dorothy, but some demons also show up at times to confuse the situation. It is noteworthy that Dorothy is a devout Catholic, as Catholics attract demonic activity due to their idolatry and many idolatrous teachings.

Even if all those creatures were aliens, that still shows that 99.99% of aliens are much more patient and peaceful than most of the most peaceful humans who ever lived.

6) Another problem with trying to associate demons with aliens is that UFOs have crashed, along with bodies, and have been retrieved. And a few aliens, that we know of, have been caught. Since when is Satan able to make anti-gravity ships that can stay material, crash, be retrieved, and living beings made of some sort of material? If he can do that, why bother with trying to possess a human and become the anti-Christ, if he can just make his own bodies? Some aliens are reported as looking just like us, even having human-dna, so why doesn’t Satan make for himself a false human body, even a baby one, let himself be adopted by some rich corrupted family? Instead he’s making aliens that do us little to no harm, and supposedly every day? That doesn’t make sense. That makes as much sense as a psychotic human with the ability to do that, spending his time doing that. Why would a psychotic person spend his time making spectacular UFOs or all kinds, all kinds of aliens, who only sometimes abduct people, who try and block them from having traumatic memories, or who take some dirt samples and then leave? Psychotics are malicious, they don’t they don’t put on shows to make anyone happy and want people to suffer and to remember that suffering. What good does it do Satan, someone who takes joy in tormenting humans, if he blocks the memories they have of that suffering? I think to say Satan is the cause of UFOs and aliens then, is attributing to him too much power and distorting his personality as someone who likes to peacefully entertain humans now and then, and even arbitrarily heal them, as one UFO is reported to have done (as documented on Unsolved Mysteries). And I think that it’s almost paranoid to attribute Satan to UFOs and aliens. It’s like saying Satan is behind anything spectacular, mysterious or very hard to understand.

7) Concerning the lack of communication from aliens, as one person asked, “Why don’t UFOs try to communicate with us”?: This could only be for one or two reasons:

We are violent and they don’t want to interfere much if at all with our development, especially knowing we are a prideful people, and that God would probably not allow it. It’s no different then a genius Christian who knows he could make some super weapon to force everyone to follow him, knowing that even if he did make such a weapon, even if he could become invincible with it, that God would not allow that Christian to control the world in that way. It would go against the plan he’s laid out in the Bible, which is one of misery for Christians until Jesus returns. And for aliens that don’t believe in a peaceful involved God, and I doubt many exist, they clearly are being kept in check by other aliens who do, or by angels, or demons whom God uses in clever ways. For example God once asked if there was a demon who would deceive a person, on God’s behalf so to speak, and one volunteered. Similarly, God could allow demons to harass aliens that intend to do something that doesn’t fit with his plan for us. God uses all kinds of means to get his way, and he always gets his way.

8) If the Bible were wrong about only thousands of years having gone by, then shouldn’t by now our skies be filled with alien visitors, not just gods or super-hero like aliens? Where are the aliens that are only a few decades or hundred years ahead of us, that are on our level so to speak? Instead it’s all races that are much farther ahead of us, and who seem to get along fine with the aliens already here.

9) The type of aliens that come to Earth refute the Mainstream Science Cult’s beliefs about religion their cults’ core beliefs, and the belief that Genesis isn’t literal (not that it isn’t also symbolic) and anyone who believes the universe is millions of years old or older, because if millions of years have gone by, some of these aliens, if truly millions of years old in technological development, would not need saucer shaped anythings, but could transform into ships or travel in whatever form they wanted. They would be like angels, and gods. But, where are they? Where is any sign of millions of years old technologically developed beings? Where are their god-offspring? Why has no god come to Earth to bring peace to it, since they know that they’ve obtained their existence through peace, and that peace is good therefore, why have they not spread it throughout the universe? Why haven’t they made at least robots that go throughout the universe wherever there is life, multiplying themselves to some limited degree to get out the message of how to obtain perfect peace and obtain godhood? Surely a being transformed by technology millions of years old would have mastery over the universe, and not allow horrendous suffering to go on and on. Some might argue, but only evolutionist theists, that God wants it that way, so we can learn, and these virtual gods know that, or, and this is ridiculous, that God perpetually keeps the creatures of the universe from passing a certain technological level so that none can benefit from anything close to technology that has been improved over millions of years (which would be endlessly miraculous, continuous direct intervention, and that isn’t God’s way as we can all see from the endless debates over whether he exists or not, hence its absurdity). What makes more sense is that, as the Bible says, Satan is restricted to this planet, to licking the dust of this earth, not the universe, and as Revelation implies will be during the millennium reign, there will be an astounding level of peace because Satan won’t be around to manipulate anyone’s emotions. So then, if that is the kind of peace we would have apart from Satan, the same must have been true for the entire universe since creation. Now, can you imagine even crudely how advanced we would have gotten had there never been interference from Satan, no flood that wiped out 1000 years of technological advancement, no major wars, no mass murders, no Hellish boredom in classrooms for hundreds of years? We would be as advanced as the aliens coming to us every day, exploring their worlds for the past thousands of years as they have ours. That they are all peaceful, have a limited degree of technology short of god-like, is evidence that the Bible is right about our world alone being polluted with demons. It doesn’t hint at all that demons bother any other world, but that there were a limited number of angels, and the ones that sinned all went to Earth. It mentions no other enemy other than unrepentant humans and human sin, and figuratively, death. The aliens that come here show technology that is thousands of years old, not millions. If millions, there would be a regular flow of aliens coming here appearing as gods, the Bible would be invalidated since these gods by their existence would be evidence that the universe is at least millions of years old, not thousands like the Bible indirectly shows, and these gods would do as they pleased since if the Bible were not reliable, then the best anyone could say about God was that he was a creator who created and mostly decided to leave the universe to itself. So, where are these gods who need no ships? Where’s anyone like the Greek and Roman gods of old, who now have a pathetic amount of followers? There’s no sign of even one, no hint that anyone has reached a level of technology older than 6,500 years.

10) It’s clear to me why many non-Christian materialists, so called “skeptics” and materialist scientists, why they refuse to acknowledge UFOs as anything other than natural or lies: the behavior of aliens shames them. What I mean is that these skeptics are very prideful as television always shows us. They pridefully and confidently brush off UFOs and miracles and often make evil remarks about theists, especially fundamentalist Christians, and call themselves rationalists, objectivists, free-thinkers, moral, and say they are free from delusions. They say it’s healthy to be skeptical and call theists biased. They say they are in pursuit of the truth and against lies, and some will be violent to show this supposed love for truth and hatred of lies. Now if all that is true, they must wonder: Why do aliens show no interest in them, or no more than what they might say is a “idiot redneck” or a lowly farmer? The only logical answer, the most honest, is that aliens at the very least see them as no better than the idiot in the woods. It’s also interesting that few if any fundamentalists report having been abducted (though I think if that were happening they’d be quiet about it, since they wouldn’t want to be rejected by their church as being under Satan’s control or aiding him and being a crazy-New Ager). I do know of one Christian however who has happily admitted to having been abducted, and an alien implant was recorded being removed from him. That aliens reject the Mainstream Science Cult, eco-terrorists and environmentalists, or rather don’t treat them any better than anyone else is evident, and to me it says that they are not better than anyone else, and perhaps even that they are worse then the “ignorant living out in the middle of no where.” And also, it shames such people because many of them have spent their time vehemently denying their existence to the point where if they were wrong, it would show them to be not objective, logical, rational, trustworthy or humble as some think they are, but arrogant, untrustworthy, idiots for having ignored and made fun of, so arrogantly, the obvious, merely because they felt it wasn’t true and went against their feelings of self-assurance, rather than true evidence, the kind they claim must be shown for anything to be believable. If aliens and UFOs were simply demonic creationists for the most part, why would Satan be shaming his ministers of deceptions? Again, as I pointed out in an earlier point, why is there no message to lead astray? Why not even a very simple one like, “Go with science” or “Science with religion is blind” or “Be one” or “Mainstream science is right” or “Michael Shermer speaks the truth” or “James Randi had the best philosphy” or “skepticism is the way”? Not even a one word message like, “evolve”, which would suggest that Darwin’s philosophy and theory was right for many. But there are a few times when these beings have made the sign of the cross, not a Darwin Fish, or pentagram, or LGBT signs, but the cross that the world recognizes as being a symbol of the suffering for the world Christ went through, even though it hated him. Some people might argue that those crosses are the exception, just violent aliens are, and that it’s too vague to take as an endorsement of Christianity. I agree, and it’s in keeping with what seems to be their policy of general non-persuasion and non-interference.

11) Clearly, God has a plan, the Bible makes that clear, and the Bible is backed up by countless evidences, archeological, scientific and logical (evidence from logic). God makes it clear from the prophets that aliens are not going to rule over us or conquer us, at least not in a significant way. Clearly, he’s set up things so that it would be futile for them. It would be self-defeating for aliens to try and conquer us for this reason: If the universe is filled with countless types of advanced races (there’s over 200 billion galaxies according to some scientists, and there’s reasonable evidence for that), they would be engaging in endless money, time and technology sapping war. War only has temporary benefits and takes the enjoyment out of life, aliens must also know this, and they know that someone else would try and come along and take their place once they took the place of our current leaders; it would never end till everything was dead. It’s more practical to let a race to itself, and only to fight back if they significantly threaten you. Some have crudely implied that the aliens who have been watching us  for thousands of years without intervening have done so because they are afraid of us or to make sure we don’t harm them, as in their race on their planet or wherever it is they live off our planet (although apparently some have bases on Earth, but that’s often forgotten by the ones making the guarding-against-humans-theory), but after thousands of years it’s surely apparent to them that we are almost entirely only a threat to our own planet. After 6,500 years the world is still at war, still oppressing itself, still enslaved to passions, pleasure and hatred, and no government is willing to share anti-gravity technology with its citizens. And I imagine, that even if such tech were sold, the price would be far out of the range of most people because of the value of such tech. People who owned it could become millionaires over night, billionaires in a few days, and take over third world countries in a short time if they were clever enough. So, by giving aliens wisdom, he’s made it clear to them the futility of attempting to rule us. On top of that, in God’s wisdom, he’s kept Satan grounded to Earth, keeping his chaos away from the rest of the universe. He’s also made it difficult to conquer Earth by placing us at a great distance from other races. And in his wisdom he’s made it clear that certain humans on Earth  is so special to him, that he’s placed the planet they live on at the center of the universe, as if to say, “Don’t harm this race or I will harm you”. Some might instantly think, “Ridiculous! Are you a flat-earther, a geocentrist nut! Only geocentrists believe Earth is the center of the universe!” Such is the response of a gullible ignoramus. The deceiver NASA itself has admitted that Earth is at the center, but twisted the truth by pretending it was 60 million years away from it, knowing that saying, “millions” would make it seem to the gullible ignorant masses was then significantly not at the center, knowing they would, in their bias against Christians and the Bible and God, fail to realize that 60 million is less than 1 percent away from the center of the universe. Being that NASA is not trustworthy, and biased, and works for a corrupt government that hides the evidence that Earth is surrounded by countless types of life and visited by it all the time, and that tries to push God out of everyone’s view to no end and failing to no end (which some would say is insane behavior), can it really be trusted to admit that Earth is at the center, when it pretended and/or believed since its existence that it wasn’t, and was and is friends with those who hate the Bible and Christians? Not surprisingly, the anti-Christian propaganda machine Discovery, known for lying to make it appear as if evolution is true and twisting facts about it to make it more easily disgestable to the masses, recently put out a website called  The Earth is the Center of the Universe: Top 10 Science Mistakes as if NASA never found the opposite. Apparently, not all evolutionists are willing to completely hide the most relevant truths, however damaging it is to their agenda. Really despicable of Discovery to lie like that isn’t it, when NASA, whom they rely on for propaganda, says the opposite?

12) There’s another reason why aliens won’t give us their technology or scientific information, or even religious: we might fail to take responsibility for our own actions when we cause disasters from what we get and learn from them, not all of us of course, but at least the very spiritually ignorant and the most rotten, of whom their are many on this world, like so called extremist Muslims and those who support them.

13) Another reason aliens might not be helping us with anything more then showing us that they exist and that faster-than-light travel is possible, is, ironically, to help us: If you give a child whatever it wants, you will spoil it, and if you give anyone whatever they want, they will become lazy leeches. And, I am sure, all aliens of a certain age, who had a fair amount of experiences in life, know about games. The significance of games is that they teach us what gives us fun in life. For most or many people who play a game, they do so for a challenge, not to start out at the game hoping to be told, “You win” with a few presses of buttons. Everyone knows it would defeat the purpose of the game by not giving a person a challenge to rid them of their boredom or to keep themselves from being bored. It would also prevent them from having a feeling of accomplishment, from saying, “With my own mind and hands I did this.” The Bible warns however that you can say that, but to acknowledge that God made it possible. Imagine if you start a game of chess, and all you have to do is press a button to checkmate your opponent, or the other player makes it fully so that you can win by making the worst moves. Is there fun in that? Or if you want to impress a girl you want to marry by working hard and earning money to care for her, would you do that if you an alien simply gave you money and she knew it? It’s no more impressive or showing you love her then if you fed her using food stamps or wandering around asking people to give you what you wanted when you could easily work for it. I imagine that aliens know not to just give hand-outs no matter what to people among their own race too.

14) Another reason aliens (who know the past 211 years of our history or who have scanned Area 51, Wright Patterson and other military bases hiding alien tech on the planet) wouldn’t give us any technology is because what we have gained from the alien tech and biological material we recovered, and clearly we have a good amount (Aurora Texas USA, Roswell, Kecksburg Pennsylvania USA, Varginha Brazil, Coyame Chihuahua Mexico, Dalnegorsk Russia and some others) is not being shared for study with the rest of the world, and little technological knowledge if any of what has been learned by the ones who possess it has been shared with us. Supposedly, the transistor, nitinol and maybe thermoplastic, is what we’ve been allowed to have. And obviously that doesn’t include the propulsion tech, the video tech, audio tech, or hull tech. And perhaps they are taking note of what those who have such tech are doing with it, and consider that an example of what we’d do with it: use it selfishly.

15) Another reason aliens wouldn’t communicate with us or help us is because they have their own problems to deal with. I imagine they are busy with other things, and are taking orders from others over them, and giving out information and technology for free, especially which might endanger them by giving us all access to other planets, and bringing our corruption to them. Some might argue that it’s cruel if they can do small charitable acts but don’t, but imagine if a country sent it’s military and scientists to investigate and guard some place, and instead of doing so often did charitable acts, it would interfere with their job. And imagine if the countless types of aliens coming to our planet were doing that: we’d be flooded with the free help I mentioned would destroy us. There are probably new races finding us every few weeks, so the free help would be endless. It could also cause many idiots to spend their time waiting for free help like some ignorant islanders are known to do who’ve gotten free things from people flying planes or who crashed in them. These islanders created plane-worshiping cults, and in fact there are at least two UFO cults. One is called Raelianism. Someone might argue that aliens could at least trade with us, but that too is silly, because aliens are far superior to us, and they know we are corrupt and desperate, and that eventually someone would try to steal from them, or kidnap them. Further, many of them could and do take our resources without asking, and can do so from the planets and asteroids around us. The fact is, they don’t need our help, and can get it freely or from other aliens they meet who are more peaceful then us and can make a fair trade when it comes to technology. Everyday we show them that most of the planet rejects, “Do to others as you would have them do to you,” and if they believe our Bible, and know it well, they know the prophecy that lawlessness is going to get worse and worse on our planet till God returns to crush the rebels.

Note that I am not saying aliens should or would not do a few good deeds to anyone here, like heal someone who has a bad health problem, isn’t a permanently hardened criminal, or is a decent person, trying to care for their children well, poverty stricken, in other words give help to the truly needy. There was an account of a woman who may have been healed of her cancer by a small disc that came into her room and perhaps spontaneous cancer remission is the result of some alien doing a kind deed. And I’m not saying they wouldn’t ever trade (it apparently happened at least once long ago, when two traded for water, and gave bland food in exchange), but I mean give us their advanced technology, greater than ours, without getting anything of equal value, which they need, back or give us prolonged involved help or mass help, like a charity organization would.

My son [including aliens], pay attention to my wisdom,
turn your ear to my words of insight,
that you may maintain discretion
and your lips may preserve knowledge.
For the lips of the adulterous woman
[which are many humans who idolize things other than God]
drip honey, and her speech is smoother than oil;
but in the end she is bitter as gall,
sharp as a double-edged sword.
Her feet go down to death;
her steps lead straight to the grave.
She gives no thought to the way of life;
her paths wander aimlessly, but she does not know it.
Now then, my sons, listen to me;
do not turn aside from what I say.
Keep to a path far from her,
do not go near the door of her house,
lest you lose your honor to others
and your dignity to one who is cruel,
lest strangers feast on your wealth
and your toil enrich the house of another.
At the end of your life you will groan,
when your flesh and body are spent.
You will say, “How I hated discipline!
How my heart spurned correction!
I would not obey my teachers
or turn my ear to my instructors.
And I was soon in serious trouble
in the assembly of God’s people.”
Drink water from your own cistern,
running water from your own well.
Should your springs overflow in the streets,
your streams of water in the public squares?
Let them be yours alone,
never to be shared with strangers.
Proverbs 5:1-17, NIV

Senator Bernie Sanders, Out of Touch Liberal Voted Against August 2nd Debt Ceiling Bill

Senator Bernie Sanders, helping the Jews, liberals and socialists to look bad

About 2 hours ago I listened to Bernie Sanders, a junior senator from Vermont, and one of SEVEN senators who voted to keep funding the infamous A.C.O.R.N. AFTER it was exposed), said on CNN today, sometime around 3 PM I think, why he voted AGAINST the debt deal that Obama recently signed to raise the debt ceiling. He said, to my amazement, that it was because it would cut hundreds of thousands of police and EVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION jobs, and a few others including fire protection. Did he say police and environmental protection!? Dead give away of a liberal when you mention environmental protection, and shows an out-of-touch person when you say police, as if whatever American police anywhere simply make things better (just like democrats Bernie probably thinks does us good, he probably thinks it would also be a tragedy if the TSA also lost their jobs). Bernie claims that he is a democratic socialist, big surprise. He also said on CNN at that time that the citizens who were calling him were making known to him that they were mainly worried if they would be getting their social security checks, able to send their kids to college (anyone heard about the student loan scam that the government involved itself in yet?) and if they would get their meal-on-wheels. When asked if the default would have been disastrous, he said, “yes”, but also said before that the deal was negotiable, but mentioned that so was social security being cancelled. But, despite it being negotiable, and up against the day of default, Bernie said he voted against the deal. Who elected this person and why is he still in office? Does Bernie know yet the terrible actions of the EPA, like promoting fluoride in the public water supply? Does he know that fluoride is harmful to human cells and bone?

Days after terrorists brought down the World Trade Center towers, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the air was safe to breathe, but that proved to be a dangerously optimistic assessment. Nearly two years later, EPA’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) reported that the EPA “did not have sufficient data and analyses to make such a blanket statement,” as “air monitoring data was lacking for several pollutants of concern.” – Source

If not, why not? Truly liberals are destroying the country.

References:

latest in a long line of bogus assaults on dioxin
Is [the] EPA ready for the truth about dioxin?
Vanishing Act [of the EPA]
EPA Ignores Advisers On Particulate Matter Standards
EPA Takes a Lax Approach to E-Waste Monitoring, GAO Report Finds
EPA’s Failure To Publicize Drinking Water Data Prompts Agency, Congress To Rethink Policies
EPA’s New Particulate Matter Standards Fail To Protect Public Health
EPA Fails to address Chemical Evaluation Problems
Farm Bureau Sues EPA Over Chesapeake Bay Cleanup
Home builders group sues EPA over new Chesapeake Bay pollution regulations
Corruption and Fraud at the EPA
Investigatiion of Corruption of Science Panels at EPA
Warning: This bill [on the National Uniformity for Foods Act] could make you sickEnvironmentalist Corruption: EPA funds Green Groups That Sue the Government
The EPA Versus the USA
Dow’s Toxic Legacy Of EPA Corruption
The Case Against Fluoride
Hobbes’ Mistake – The Rational Case For Anarchy

Chariots of the Deluded: No To Giorgio, Down With Daniken, Ditch Sitchen

Yesterday night’s Coast to Coast AM show (07-31-11), titled “Ancient Aliens”, featuring Giorgio Tsoukalos the,

“Producer of Ancient Aliens, and publisher of Legendary Times magazine,”. The rest of the Coats description of the show is,

“Giorgio A. Tsoukalos, joins George Knapp to ponder the idea that extraterrestrials have been visiting us since the dawn of man and how one day they might return.”

Once again Georgi skewed or rather skewered the Bibl by making it out to be a misunderstood story about an alien. Obviously he hasn’t read the Bible carefully or the evidence for its claims. He repeatedly made various cliche and stupid comments, like that if aliens were time travelers, that “we wouldn’t pull anyone’s leg” (if “we” went back in ancient days and met ancients) by telling them we were anything other than them from the future. How stupid to generalize all humans as being nice and honest, including the ancients, when he knows that humans are so corrupt, that these beings we call “aliens” mostly won’t talk to most of us. He also spoke about the Quetzalcoatl legend, saying that “we know that snakes don’t fly” and that therefore it must have been some machine. Giorgio apparently is no cryptozoology fan or one himself, or doesn’t listen to Coast to Coast himself much, since on it and on the internet are accounts of flying serpents that have been seen in modern times. Accounts of flying serpents by the way would be evidence for the Bible’s claim that God disabled snakes from flying, evidence in that if it were a biological ability, then it could be that very very rarely there will be a flying one from a recessive gene expressing itself, or cousins of snakes that retained the ability to fly, though hidden mostly in the wild. Further, he claimed that Quetzalcoatl came from the mouth of a snake, something that isn’t found in the legends about him. However, there is at least one legend that claims he left on a raft of snakes (hardly UFO-like or indicative of a god-like alien, more like an insane one). He also claimed that the resurrections in the Bible might really have been resuscitation, which is very dumb, since there is no indication in the Bible at all, only the opposite, that that is what they were: it says that ancients were resurrected, points out ancients returning in spirit form, that a prophet is what resurrected a dead boy, by lying on him in an odd manner, that Lazarus was wrapped and rotting, and that Jesus was beaten and bled to death, and also wrapped along with herbs (would that have helped a dead man to breath or helped his blood circulation?) So clearly Giorgio is an ignorant speculator who isn’t interested in understanding the truth, but only airing the opinions of his heart.

Giorgio also believes that proof will be found that our DNA was altered by aliens in the past, but even if that were so, so what? Would that invalidate the Bible is someone made it more frequent for humans to have red hair, or less so? Further, why would it have to be an enhancement rather than a correction, like making diabetes less frequent, or staving off for a while some allergy, or causing giantism and multiple fingers and toes or other odd features? So? So then relegate the Bible to a quaint misunderstanding just because of that? Another problem with Giorgio’s beliefs about aliens changing our DNA in ancient times, is: if they have a prime directive as he and the interview George Knapp seemed to believe, or if they stay away from us mostly, if they at the most make some alien human hybrid babies for themselves, probe us or put some tracking devices in us, and not many, then why would they do something major like change our DNA, as in the DNA of all humans? Would that not be a violation of any Prime Directive? Further, how in the world would you change the DNA of millions of humans? Or did Giorgio mean some monkey or ape-like or human-like creatures (maybe he thinks Neanderthals, which were most likely already humans according to some scientists, both Christian and non-Christian scientists), so that a modern human type came out, us? Supposing that were the case, that would mean that aliens pre-programmed us with new skills and guided us, rather than God (the Bible says that God at various times taught humans things, besides the Scripture). And if were aliens that taught us, why would they not make it clear even BILLIONS of years later!? And what a sad job they did if it took BILLIONS OF YEARS for humans to come about from monkeys or apes. That was the best DNA manipulating aliens or who made life on Earth could do? It took them BILLIONS of years? Supposing humans keep up the level of (Hellish) peace they have now, and kept technologically progressing, would it take us that long to learn how to make life or turn it into humans? Yet Giorgio claims archeologists are insulting humanity when they dismiss his theories. But clearly, it’s his anti-Christian claims that are insulting both mankind and God, and elevating aliens beyond their abilities. The only one who can make life, the souls necessary for it, is God, with the exception of Satan one day, to make “the beast”. Perhaps Satan will figure out finally how to make souls and physical life or God will temporarily give him that ability, just long enough to make that creature, or, perhaps angels already have that ability, but God suppresses it or disabled it in demons like Satan (and will one day restore Satan’s ability to give birth for a moment).

Giorgio isn’t just crypto-ignorant, but as was revealed on the show, also ignorant that Atlantis was already found (beware of the Zedo popups on Piratebay), years ago (maybe even in 1973), and that it corroborated the Bible archeologically. also said on the show, “you know I’m a very nuts and bolts kind of guy,” but how so if he as he implied on the show, he believes in aliens who are so advanced that we can’t see them, in rotting dead people or skeletons being resuscitated and in a vague “God who doesn’t play dice”? He also made out Einstein to be a scientific genius for supposedly saying to someone who asked him if he believed in God, that if the asker meant a God who didn’t play dice, then yes he believes in that definition (which doesn’t at all define what God is). Giorgio also said that when science and religion combine that then we’ll know the truth, but if that were so, then we already would, since there is already Mainstreamism, Darwinism, , and UFO cults like Scientology and Raelianism and all of those are failures. Further, Christianity already incorporates science, many of it’s members practice science (in ordinary ways every day like non-Christians) and it’s even taught in the story of Gideon. Further, in what way does Giorgio mean by “combine”? Like the examples I already gave, it’s already been combined. And why doesn’t he do it himself if that’s the case? But by his own admission then, Christianity leads to the truth, but because of his ignorance about the basics of Christianity, doesn’t realize he’s spiritually blind.

For those ignorant about the Bible, too lazy to read even a small part of it carefully, who believe or wonder if UFO’s were being talked about in Ezekiel: NO. If you read the first pages it clearly points out that these are spiritual creatures that perhaps animals were made in the image of. Would God be limited to just making angels and humans and aliens and animals? Couldn’t he make even stranger creatures? Maybe he’s even made creatures in this universe that are energy-based or which hardly have anything we’d think of as blood, and are very much like machines (but knowing God such machine-like creatures would have machine-like cells, making them as complex as a human body). I wonder what Mainstreamers would think if they found machine-like aliens, or crystaline-aliens, and found programming in their cells or the particles making up the crystals, would they finally admit to a divine programmer, or just dismiss it as just more coincidental, random-made order?

Related Information:

Does the Bible/Ezekiel Refer to UFOs/Aliens?

Zecharia Sitchin’s Errors:An Overview