Home > atheism, atheist morality, atheists, Darwinists, Humanism > Reddit.com Hides the Truth: Carl Sagan Was a Narcissist and Credit Theif: “A Pale Blue Dot Refuted”

Reddit.com Hides the Truth: Carl Sagan Was a Narcissist and Credit Theif: “A Pale Blue Dot Refuted”

April 2, 2011

I heard the ”Pale Blue Dot” poem or speech from Carl the crazy, humanist, atheist, evolutionist, hypocrite Sagan on Alex Jones at about 3:30 AM today, more like night, and was angered and annoyed by what I heard. I broke his rant apart and refuted it.

Sagan: “From this distant vantage point, the Earth might not seem of any particular interest.”

That can be said of a lot of things from a far away distance, so what?

“But for us, it’s different.”

Is that profound, to say that humans are interested in what is around them? That’s something to say to very little kids, not any intelligent kid over eight years of age. Humans are also interested in their own bodies, and those of others, adding that would have given it more complexity at least.

“Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home.”

I look forward to my home in Heaven, and Earth after evil people like Sagan, and Satan are no longer polluting it and tempting others to be hateful like them, and after it’s been melted down and reformed into perfectly beautiful safe place.

“That’s us.”


“On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives.”

And those God loved continue to live in Heaven. (For you who are ignorant of Scripture, it says, “You are angry with the wicked every day,” and “You hate all who do wrong.”

“The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every “superstar,” every “supreme leader,” every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there – on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.”

WOW: AND I THOUGHT I MADE RUN ON SENTENCES. WOW. Besides nerdy and pretentious I couldn’t follow that and won’t. That turned this speech into a rant.

“The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena.”

That statement shows that Sagan had little to no conscience. It’s a stage for narcissists like you and sociopaths and psychopaths and the arrogant, who think or act like life is a game. Life is not a game or act. When little kids are physically and emotionally abused and cry in pain, scream out in pain and feel like committing suicide, hey are not acting, they are not putting on a show to entertain, nor are others of any age who are severely abused or in the process of being murdered.

“Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors, so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot.”

Yes: and atheist leaders like Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, and the Chinese atheist government and the atheism supporter Hitler and Roman Catholics Mussolini and Franco, who together, in less than 100 years, murdered over 300,000,000 people, and severely persecuted those who loved God. And the Chinese government still severely persecutes Christians who won’t conform to their atheist-approved version of Christianity, and there are still many atheist leaders and police in Russia and it’s former satellite states who persecute Christians, including Belarus, which right now is ruled by someone worse than Hitler (because unlike Hitler, this man has much easier access to information about God, and so knows better not to do what he is doing).

“Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner,”

So, the Anglo-Saxons look like Pygmies? Muscovites look like the Ashkens and Sephars of Israel? Many Israelites have a rough and crude appearance. Their aren’t many fine Israelis.

“how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.”

This rant had no point. It seems to be a more pretentious form of the logical fallacies: “War is bad/War is bad because people die (and it causes pain)” and “Arguing is bad (because it’s unpleasant)” which as far as I know never have what I put in brackets, and so are still pointless. Even saying, “because people die” is pointless, because why is death bad in all cases? On top of that anti-population expansion people want people to die, in huge numbers (which by the way shows that they could care less about technological progression, such as colonizing space, and are therefore boring and anti-scientific, and yet are often evolutionists and supporters of the Mainstream Science religion which is supposed to be about having fun learning and making money and helping others, technological progression, scientific progression and colonizing space, though many in that cult if not all are also against population expansion, which therefore shows that Mainstreamers and non-scientists which are against population expansion but who support Mainstreamers are a self-conflicted, confused (or forgetful) and hypocritical group.

Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

How does Earth, which you pretentiously call a point of pale light, challenge “the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe” if Earth is not alive? And what makes it a delusion to think God gave us the privilege of seeing his creations, enjoying them, serving him and being one of the focuses of his attention and other things? Further, why did he “Universe”, rather than God or aliens? I sure don’t see any mention of Geocentrism in this rant in any way, so why did he just speak out against it? Was there something Carl the liar didn’t want the world to realize, but to keep a secret for the elitists he served?

“Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark.”

This liar was bribed by elitists to mislead people away from the fact that Earth is often visited by aliens (and he took the bribe), every day now, and that the U.S. government had possession of alien ships and bodies. In my last post I even have pictures of a UFO I saw a few days ago.

“In our obscurity,”

We’re not obscure if aliens are always coming here of many kinds, in ships that can travel to other planets with life that is alien to them, and when thousands of angels and demons know about us and fight against or protect us every day.

“in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.”

God’s word is everywhere, the book he wrote through mankind is the most popular, widespread, numerous, free and priced, most influential book in the world and has been translated into the more languages than any other book. And it clearly says God will save those he loves from those who hate Him and therefore them. Further, one time a saucer did help an army to get through a wall, so that is a hint that they might help SOME humans and save them, again, one day. And they be populating other parts of the universe with humans. There are many missing people that have never been found, and aliens are known to take blood samples and cattle parts, which they might be using for cloning and medicine.

“The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life.”

Liar. And that statement is pointless.

“There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit yes. Settle, not yet.”

We already have alien ships and probably ones based on their technology, and even if we don’t, the richest countries could easily colonize the Moon or Mars if they haven’t already, or make space stations near Europa and Titan and use the resources from them to live, and after doing those things, continuing to colonize the solar system, and from there, the rest of the galaxy, until the whole universe is filled with humans. The things which stop us from doing those things are people with anti-scientific and anti-truth beliefs and belief systems like and worse than Carl Sagan’s and evil behavior and speech in general, which Christians also do at times.If true Christians used their money for space colonization instead of evangelization, charity, and luxury goods, then they would be successful at it, so long as they didn’t totally forsake their main goals, and didn’t commit any atrocities which God would hold them responsible for as a group, and punish them for in such a way that it would stop them from space colonization.

“Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.”

What does it matter where location you “take a stand” against something is? And take a stand for what? Against people like you? Satan? And I thought he was against taking stands against people? Or did he expect those warring against each other to just tolerate child abuse, murder, stealing, lying, fraud, drunkenness, stalking, harassment and insane people always disturbing their peace or encouraging such things with illogical rants? Did he expect people to just get up and stand at a podium and speaker and complain, “Why can’t we all get a long?” as if merely asking with sadness would make everyone more logical and kinder or perfectly?

“It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character building experience.”

Who said this, and what does it matter? It was because Carl Sagan was a narcissist, and one who was an astronomer and so wanted everyone to think that he was a humble person (a good person) with a “character” (and what kind of character?). Typical sign of a narcissist: use some eloquent or big word in a way that is vague, and therefore makes no point, because narcissists are careless with logic and lazy when it comes to thinking and more interested in sounding smart for easy friends, money, please, praise, admiration, and so just put out catch words for those things.

“There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world.”

How is a distant image an example of Earth an example of “the folly of human conceits” Mr. “People Say That Astronomers Are Said to Be Humble and Have a Built Up Character?” Or were you talking about that conceited statement being that it was the last action you mentioned?

“To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we’ve ever known.”

Why does “a distant image of Earth being “the best demonstration of folly of human conceits” underscore to you that “we” (me and the millions of kind charitable Christians you hated, too full of hate and self-centered to bother to get to know?) need to “deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot”? Besides that not making sense: are you God that your desires should be followed over anyone else’s? And what do you mean by “kind” or “more” kind Mr. Morally Vague Astronomer With the Built Up Moral Character? Why should anyone do what you advise, even you had been specific by saying, “Don’t lie, don’t steal, don’t murder, don’t make images of or worship imaginary gods, love your neighbor as yourself, forgive your enemies, be kind to strangers, bless your enemies not just your friends, and by doing these things are doing, “Do to others as you would have them do to you” which is what you should do” ? If there is no God, then shouldn’t we take this advice, given by God:

“If the dead [will] not rise [(be resurrected)] at all? Why [would] people baptized on their behalf? Why are we [putting ourselves] in danger every hour [if they won’t be brought back to life]? I protest, brothers, by my pride in you, which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, [for whom] I die every day! What do I gain, if, humanly speaking, I fought with beasts at Ephesus? If the dead [will] not rise, [then]: “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.” – 1 Corinthians 15:29-32

Most people are reckless like Carl Sagan, and for a bribe that he couldn’t take with him to the grave, to enjoy forever, and so was only temporary, would imprison everyone forever on a “lonely obscure pale blue dot filled with conceited people who hate each other and kill each other.” And how would such people preserve their home if that is what they are like, and don’t grow out of? If they are liars and bribe takers like Carl? Will they change because of a nonsensical pretentious poem, even by being a little kinder, whatever that means to anyone? How could they if nothing changes them according to astronomers and Mainstreamers like Carl? Why should anyone listen to him, especially if they know he was a liar and bribe taker and took a bribe to consign all humans except some illogical elitists like him, to an obscure death? And why would it be conceited if we are trapped on this obscure planet then, in which life alone may exist, to then try and be the center of attention, especially if it’s merely a stage with many viewers nearby and no where else, and when our lives are supposedly only going to be short and the only ones we will ever have, according to atheists, which Carl was?

It is obvious to me that Carl Sagan was a narcissist, from his past words, like his arrogant insult on the Jay Leno Show, which was that there is no “old man with a beard in the sky,”and this Pale Blue Dot speech, which is illogical.

Update: 4/7/2011

Carl the Credit Theif

About an hour ago I discovered, that on February 19, 2011, bandpitdeviant made a post on Reddit in which he implied that on his own, Carl Sagan came up with a logical fallacy list, as did Sagan, in his book, “Demon Haunted World”. I pointed out in repeated replies that it was Christians who came up with those lists, and that even Darwin, whom Carl trusted in, had stolen credit from others by pretending to have come up with the theory of natural selection on his own, when Edward Blyth, a naturalist creationist was the one who mainly came up with it. Now besides pride being why the atheists of Reddit would be deleting my replies, meaning their pride was offended, it’s also obvious that they might be deleting them because that page bandpitdeviant made, shows how gullible atheists are, and prideful: at the time of me posting this, about 200 people voted bandpit’s post up, and because I kept replying to it (it was dying in popularity before I started replying to it again), and most likely, it was atheists doing so, because Reddit is an atheist-oriented website, which promotes atheism, and it can see from the replies, that atheists are the ones supporting the post and claim that Carl came up with the logic fallacy list.

Deliberate atheism is truly a denial of truth.

Related Posts:

Richard Dawkins: A Narcissist Who Requires Christians to Have “Credentials”

Skeptic ‘Dr.’ Michael Shermer Speaks On Coast to Coast A.M.

Yet Another Atheist With Narcissism Disorder

Just Have Faith: Stephen Hawking says, “Gravity did it.”

The Vain Mark Twain

”Evil Bible”? What Anti-Christians Conveniently Ignore

Atheists Fail at Logic

Characteristics of the Mainstream Science Cult and How It Imprisons the World

The Signs of a Sociopath, Psychopath and Narcissist

[Comments are closed to this article because no atheist has been able to come up with anything useful to say other than to show that atheists are careless readers, hypocrites, immoral and very irritating. There are plenty of comments to read here and on other articles though].

Categories: atheism, atheist morality, atheists, Darwinists, Humanism Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  1. Ehcks
    November 3, 2011 at 6:57 AM

    ‘“The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life.”

    Liar. And that statement is pointless.’

    Could I ask how this is a lie? What other world harbors life?

    • November 3, 2011 at 7:15 AM

      When you quote me, use the b-quote, because you did it wrong so that it makes it confusing to tell who is saying what, it looks like you are calling me a liar because you stupidly didn’t use the block quote or additional quotes, apparently because you’re a slop brain who doesn’t care about wasting time. Also, you already did ask how it’s a lie why are you asking my permission? Could it be because you’re an unthinking idiot who just wants to show off on the Internet, which is really dumb to do? Hey look at me everyone I’m asking for permission to ask a question and a dumb one on top of that, wow aren’t I impressive? No you’re dumb. Did you even bother reading what I wrote fully, because you’re asking what the article already answers. HE SAID HE BELIEVES IN UFOS SO WHERE DO YOU THINK THEY COME FROM, EARTH? May I ask why you are asking such an extremely stupid question? Do you think angels live on Earth too? You didn’t notice this is a CHRISTIAN blog? So the creatures from Roswell and every other alien that has been seen, they all live in this “world”? Thanks for wasting my time idiot. Please think before you ask something, try and think for once. And moron, if Carl believed there was life elsewhere in the universe, and idiot did you not hear of SETI yet, then why the Hell are you questing me? You’re asking me you idiot what he had no problem with and wrote a book on, had a movie based on and encouraged millions of dollars to be spent on to prove his believe that life was on other PLANETS idiot. So what’s your religion? Are you yet another dumb atheist? Oh wait: I see a world with life on it, yeah that one to the left. What an idiot.

  2. Ehcks
    November 3, 2011 at 12:30 PM

    I do not see a quote button, but I’ve never posted here. I used double and single quotation marks in standard form to show that I was quoting you and that you were quoting someone else.

    You said that the statement by Carl Sagan “The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life” is a lie. I asked how it was a lie, and I asked if you knew of another world with life on it.

    Do you know of another world with life on it? The claim that there must be one does not count. Do you know one exists, that you can give a location and name for?

    • November 3, 2011 at 5:47 PM

      Ehcks, if you’re trying to save face, it’s not working. Whether you are a Christian or atheist, who these days can seriously say, or try to prove a negative like that anyone is justified in for whatever reason in saying, “We’re the only place with life because we only know about this place.” Besides HEAVEN as I was implying to you that “we” Christians know exists, especially the ones who’ve gone there, and Christ came from there figuratively speaking, and angels are still seen however rare, this universe has over 250 billion galaxies by some estimations, and it’s not unreasonable to believe that with all the billions or trillions of stars that most have, that there is at least one or two planets in each galaxy with life, and when apparently non-human made vehicles have been being seen for thousands of years. Even if those were humans in every single one that was a ship and not something like ball lightning, it’s not unreasonable to think that humans with such technology have colonized some planet other than this. Or can you reasonably prove that aside from Heaven, that there’s no way life exists elsewhere in the universe or that not a single planet with life anywhere in the universe is likely to also contain life? And like I said, Carl didn’t even believe we were the only ones, even if that claim that he believed in UFOs is a lie, he at least implied he believed there was life elsewhere so far as to even spend money in hopes of hearing them.

      From the dead Carl Sagan:

      The best current estimates of the number and spacing of Earth-mass planets in newly forming planetary systems (as George Wetherill reported at the first international conference on circumstellar habitable zones [Doyle, 1995]) combined with the best current estimates of the long-term stability of oceans on a variety of planets (as James Kasting reported at that same meeting [Doyle, 1995]) suggest one to two blue worlds around every Sun-like star. Stars much more massive than the Sun are comparatively rare and age quickly. Stars comparatively less massive than the Sun are expected to have Earth-like planets, but the planets that are warm enough for life are probably tidally locked so that one side always faces the local sun. However, winds may redistribute heat from one hemisphere to another on such worlds, and there has been very little work on their potential habitability.

      Nevertheless, the bulk of the current evidence suggests a vast number of planets distributed through the Milky Way with abundant liquid water stable over lifetimes of billions of years. Some will be suitable for life–our kind of carbon and water life–for billions of years less than Earth, some for billions of years more. And, of course, the Milky Way is one of an enormous number, perhaps a hundred billion, other galaxies.

      Need Intelligence Evolve on an Inhabited World?

      We know from lunar cratering statistics, calibrated by returned Apollo samples, that Earth was under hellish bombardment by small and large worlds from space until around 4 billion years ago. This pummeling was sufficiently severe to drive entire atmospheres and oceans into space. Earlier, the entire crust of Earth was a magma ocean. Clearly, this was no breeding ground for life.

      Yet, shortly thereafter–Mayr adopts the number 3.8 billion years ago–some early organisms arose (according to the fossil evidence). Presumably the origin of life had to have occupied some time before that. As soon as conditions were favorable, life began amazingly fast on our planet. I have used this fact (Sagan, 1974) to argue that the origin of life must be a highly probable circumstance; as soon as conditions permit, up it pops!…

      If we consider the statistics of one, our own case–and take a typical time from the origin of a planetary system to the development of a technical civilization to be 4.6 billion years–what follows? We would not expect civilizations on different worlds to evolve in lock step. Some would reach technical intelligence more quickly, some more slowly, and– doubtless–some never. But the Milky Way is filled with second- and third-generation stars (that is, those with heavy elements) as old as 10 billion years.

      So let’s imagine two curves: The first is the probable timescale to the evolution of technical intelligence. It starts out very low; by a few billion years it may have a noticeable value; by 5 billion years, it’s something like 50 percent; by 10 billion years, maybe it’s approaching 100 percent. The second curve is the ages of Sun-like stars, some of which are very young– they’re being born right now–some of which are as old as the Sun, some of which are 10 billion years old.

      If we convolve these two curves, we find there’s a chance of technical civilizations on planets of stars of many different ages–not much in the very young ones, more and more for the older ones. The most likely case is that we will hear from a civilization considerably more advanced than ours. For each of those technical civilizations, there have been tens of billions or more other species. The number of unlikely events that had to be concatenated to evolve the technical species is enormous, and perhaps there are members of each of those species who pride themselves on being uniquely intelligent in all the universe.

  3. John
    November 3, 2011 at 5:27 PM

    You seem awfully spiteful and intolerant for somebody who claims to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ.

    Just sayin’.

    • November 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM

      And tell me the teachings of Jesus Christ to a scholar on them John enough to know that you are able to correctly judge me. And please, to whom do I seem hateful: Christians of my own group which number in the millions? Or to atheists, agnostics, Buddhists, Taoists, pagans and anti-Christians? Be careful how you word yourself, otherwise it may seem as if you when you say “seems” that you are speaking for how the entire planet perceives me. First learn the teachings of Jesus Christ and get right with God, then you can judge me. Further, it’s a hateful thing to simply say, “You seem hateful to me for someone who claims to follow Jesus Christ (and forget the fact that your journal is covered with evidence that you are including in the very article I’m quoting… I’m just telling you this just because I feel like it.” And ignoring the fact that I am one of the few Christians John that has a page dedicated to explaining how to get eternal life to everyone enemies included. And John, intolerant of what? Stupidity? So you love stupidity or are perfectly happy to be around deliberately stupid people or people who even if brainwashed, can’t bring themselves to use a search engine or to use their so called common sense and when they are adults and surrounded with wisdom and when it’s at their fingertips and all over my page on which they ask me stupid questions or make stupid time-wasting insults like yours? Tell me what else to love and tolerate. Sin? Should I love lying, theft and murder? How about when someone blasphemes God, the one I love and worship? I should be all joy over that right? Oh, no, just tolerate it and not speak against it. And for how long John should I be tolerant of it, how about God, how long should he not be angry about it? Let me guess, “For as long as it seems right to me God.” Are you’re feelings the standard for right from wrong? You must think they are, why else would you let people know about them when there is no reason to care about what you feel? Are you some scholar, wise man, seer, someone famous, are you even forgiven of your sins? If God hates sin, why are you amazed that those who follow him also hate it? And before judging someone as “Hey you don’t seem very Christian to me,” how about moving your eyes around a little on the journal you’re commenting on and doing a little exploring before saying such a thing? But you don’t, at least not carefully, yet, you call me spiteful and intolerant.

      And how “awfully” stupid and short-sidghted and thoughtless is your comment besides what I’ve pointed out already? John: If I’M AGREEING WITH CARL SAGAN AND AND ALL ATHEISTS WHO SAY IT’S ARROGANT TO SAY WE’RE ALONE IN THE UNIVERSE (YET STRANGELY DON’T CONSIDER THEMSELVES ARROGANT TO SAY, “EXCEPT FOR ANY GOD OF ANY KIND”) AND WITH ALL THOSE UFO-BELIEVING, ALIEN-BELIEVING ANTI-CHRISTIAN NEW AGERS AND CHRISTIAN-TOLERANT NEWS AGERS, AND ALL THE AGNOSTICS AND ATHEISTS WHO BELIEVE IN THEM, AND BUDDHISTS, AND OTHERS, WHO COMBINED ARE A NUMBER MUCH LARGER THAN THE MILLIONS OF CHRISTIANS OF MY GROUP, WHILE THERE ARE HARDENED ARROGANT SPITEFUL SNOBBISH SMUG DEEPLY HATEFUL AGNOSTICS AND ATHEISTS SOME OF WHOM EVEN STALK THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH THEM, HOW IN THE HELL ARE YOU SAYING, “I THINK YOU’RE AWFULLY SPITEFUL AND MEAN FOR SOMEONE WHO TELLS OTHERS TO OBEY GOD AND YET SAYS YOU OBEY GOD BY OBEYING GOD BY TELLING OTHERS TO OBEY HIM AND DOING SO YOURSELF BY HATING SIN.” No wait John, you’re right: I’m intolerant, I should be happy about my atheist stalkers and all the hateful and arrogant skeptics who repeatedly and hatefully attack and insult Christians and over all the other Hellish things I’ve gone through in life and should love sin and hypocrisy. Right John? It seems awfully much like that is what you are saying I should do. Do you also say to atheists and skeptics who say hateful things to Christians non stop every day, especially in places they control like Yahoo Answers, who stalk Christians, “You seem awfully hateful and intolerant for someone who claims they care about people being deceived and killed and having their life wasted.” Or how about John, to those who support the communist atheists, who, in the name of progress, prosperity and health, and I’m sure in the name of evolving, together all combined, massacred or slowly killed over 50 million people? Do you think it’s also intolerant to murder a baby before it’s born, or should everyone be nice and happy about that? Stop being smug and apathetic.

  4. John
    November 3, 2011 at 6:36 PM

    All I meant was that Jesus taught that we should be tolerant, loving and accepting. He taught that we should love our neighbors. He taught that we should forgive.

    You don’t sound like a very good Christian at all. You sound miserable and spiteful, as if you’ve abandoned your heart to the devil and are just looking for somebody, anybody to direct your hatred towards.

    I will pray for you.

    PS. You’ve also been misspelling the word, “thief.”

    • November 4, 2011 at 1:02 AM

      Did you read a word I said? JESUS DID NOT TEACH TOLERANCE. AND IT’S AGAINST COMMON SENSE TO TOLERATE DELIBERATE STUPIDITY, LYING, THIEVERY, AND MURDER. THE BIBLE DOES NOT TEACH TOLERANCE. It teaches PATIENCE. Stop provoking me to teach you Bible basics, it’s sickening, and I won’t tolerate you wasting my time anymore. It says in the Bible Mr. Tolerate All Evil: “AVOID ARGUMENTS OF IGNORANCE”. You have no common sense on top of that, and by the way, the Bible, specifically Paul, mentions MORONS. Might wanna read that part.

  5. November 4, 2011 at 1:04 AM

    To those of the James Randi kook forum, say hello to that intolerant bias moron Lisa Simpson for me, that self-righteous hypocrite with a stupid sense of humor, that malicious idiot. Where’s your journal that gets more than 500 hits a day Lisa the idiot? No where narcissist. Stop attacking people who won’t worship you you stupid fool.

  6. November 4, 2011 at 4:34 AM

    You take a beautiful poem about how war and hatred is bad and how we should cherish life and take care of another and the earth and slam it because… to you, it shows Sagan had “very little to no conscience”. You’re ANGRY at Sagan for believing that we should live a peaceful, environment-friendly life and love each other?

    So basically, if a Christian wrote it, it’d be profound and beautiful, but because it’s written by a nonbeliever it’s automatically bad and offensive?

    I’m astounded.

    • November 4, 2011 at 10:37 AM

      Moron beauty is not what matters, truth is what matters. Wow, just wow how you can’t accept that and get over the childish reasoning that “beauty = good” that “beauty = better”. Listen to God, “Charm is deceptive and beauty is fleeting, but a woman who fears Yahweh is to be praised,” or as morons like you sometimes say, “Don’t judge a book by it’s cover.” How can you forget such basic things in life you pretentious idiot who thinks their feelings make them right? Wowy wow just wow. Hey look, the more I say wow and the more passionate I am the more right I am! No doesn’t work that way. Face reality.

  7. Ehcks
    November 4, 2011 at 11:41 AM

    This is all my fault, for expecting to find a little rationality on the internet.

    Nothing but an angry ranter.

    I’m sorry, everyone. I should not have posted here.

  8. youwillcallmemoronanyway
    November 4, 2011 at 12:15 PM

    knight :
    Ehcks, if you’re trying to save face, it’s not working. Whether you are a Christian or atheist, who these days can seriously say, or try to prove a negative like that anyone is justified in for whatever reason in saying, “We’re the only place with life because we only know about this place.” there’s no way life exists elsewhere in the universe or that not a single planet with life anywhere in the universe is likely to also contain life?

    You seem to have a reading comprehension problem. Sagan’s quote does not imply, let alone attempt to prove, that earth is the only planet with life. It clearly says that it’s the only planet KNOWN to have life, which is a fact.

    • November 4, 2011 at 7:33 PM

      “You seem to have a reading comprehension problem.”

      Because you said so.

      “Sagan’s quote does not imply, let alone attempt to prove,”

      You seem to have a reading comprehension problem, because I never said it implied there was life elsewhere OR moron that it proved it. Where did you get that you stupid idiot? Wow what an ultra dumb atheist, ultra dumb, and wow talk about eating your own words, you rammed them down your own throat you idiot. IF YOU HADN’T NOTICED YOU MASSIVE MORON: THE POST IS ABOUT CARL’S HYPOCRISY MORON, MORON, ULTRA MORON. HOW MANY TIMES MORON MUST I POINT THAT OUT, HOW MUCH MORE CLEAR CAN I SAY THAT BEING THAT I ALREADY DID MULTIPLE TIMES MORON? MORON!? MORON!!! WHAT A MORON! Idiot! And that’s what you moron atheists are like, “Oh do please for you do not understand and you are not obeying your Christ, for you are stupid and confused and you seem not to be able to comprehend anything, oh yes indeed (oh Jeeves being me my cheese and wine tah tah), for you claim that Planet Kolob has life because Carl Sagan said so.” NO IDIOT, I DID NOT. READ IDIOT, INSTEAD OF SAYING, “YOU CAN’T COMPREHEND NOTHING IT SEEMS.” IDIOT: READ FIRST AND COMPREHEND FIRST AND ONCE AGAIN FOR THE ONE HUNDREDTH BILLIONTH TIME MORON: GET THE LOG OUT OF YOUR EYE FOOL, BEFORE FIDDLING WITH THE STICK YOU THING YOU SEE IN MINE, NOT EVEN A STICK, A SPLINTER. YOU ARE A MASSIVE HYPOCRITE JUST LIKE THE OTHERS HERE I REBUKED, AND MASSIVELY BLIND, MASSIVELY STUPID, SO MASSIVELY STUPID YOU ATE YOUR WORDS TO THE EXTREME. Now how many more billions and billions of times do you moron weasels need it demonstrated to you that you are spiritually blinded by God, that you are immoral hypocrites which is why God is blinding you so badly, and need to be FORGIVEN OF YOUR SINS FIRST BEFORE YOU GO AROUND SAYING, “HEY THERE’S NO LIFE ON OTHER PLANETS SO UR A BAD AND DUMB CHRISTIAN TO SAY THAT CARLY SAID THERE IS,” WHEN ON TOP OF THAT MORON, THE POINT IS THE ABSURDITY OF SAYING THERE ISN’T (WOW AM I REPEATING THAT FOR THE 100 BILLIONTH TIME? UGH!) AND THAT CARL WAS A HYPOCRITE, A NARCISSIST HYPOCRITE WHO COULDN’T MAKE STRAIGHT SENSE. GET FORGIVEN ALREADY IDIOTS, OR STAY DUMB AND BURN IN HELL FOREVER. YOU’RE FAULT, BECAUSE YOU WERE WARNED, AND CHOSE TO KEEP RUNNING HEAD ON INTO GOD’S FIST LIKE INSANE COMPULSIVE HIGHLY IMMATURE CHILDREN.

      “that earth is the only planet with life. It clearly says that it’s the only planet KNOWN to have life, which is a fact.”


      “Carl didn’t say Mars had life, not one planet (crosses fingers and closes eyes straining not to let her hateful crazed laughter out and thinks to herself, “but just forget that he believed the universe was filled with it you stupid Christian tee hee hee.”)”

      Okay, I will idiot: so your point is that Carl was a stupid time wasting atheist who wasted money having us search the universe for imaginary beings. Of course, cuz he was a typical deluded stupid atheist.

      “Whoever rolls a rock, that rock will be rolled back on him.”
      and “Whoever digs a pit will fall into it.” Oh was that not accurate enough for you? Gnat strainers? Want me speak God’s word to you in Hebrew? But then you’d say, “But now we can’t understand you!” Damn the messenger if he does, damn him if he doesn’t.

      And if you found that annoying and hard to read, guess what it’s like for me reading your time wasting babble over and over and over, and after I’ve already carefully analyzed for years over 500 arguments against religion, the Bible and Christianity? When I wasted my life constantly listening to morons like you and arguing with you because you wanted to ram your beliefs down my throat till I was like you, or like various atheists stalkers I had, killed myself in tormenting insanity? And I still have two atheist stalkers who won’t leave me alone! But, God bless you, may you have a nice life.

  9. Fakeem
    November 5, 2011 at 7:39 AM

    Maybe you should ask your imaginary friend for help with your anger issues.

    • November 5, 2011 at 7:56 AM

      Maybe you, “not judge, for with the judgement you use shall you be judged”? Maybe, Mr. Perfect, you should, “Do to others first as you would have them do to you”, hypocrite? Maybe you should pray to the real God you childishly pretend doesn’t exist for forgiveness for using logical fallacies like Ad hominem attacks to try to force your psychopathy and Insanity of Doubt down my throat? Wouldn’t that help me to not be angry, moron who can’t see design? And moron: who said God wasn’t helping me, who said I didn’t pray moron who is too much of a worthless coward to use a real name and email, who is too much of a liar? Isn’t assumption a logical fallacy. Shouldn’t you know that moron since you’re a wise and superior atheist who is friends with atheists who hijacked the logical fallacies taught by the ancient Greek philosophers, repeatedly posting them on the net as if you actually care about logic? Hypocrite?

      Shouldn’t you face reality instead of repeatedly thinking what is illogical will ever be true, it sure does show that you have anger problems. And no moron, I won’t be an apathetic idiot like you who is happy over atheists murdering 100 million people in the last 100 years. Maybe you should stop pretending the God you hate that doesn’t give you your way doesn’t exist and ask your atheist friends to stop murdering people while telling Christians “you have anger issues” you stupid hypocrite. And let’s see you make the same dumb mocking remark to God on Judgment Day, you psychopath. In short moron, no, I won’t be not angry at idiocy and evil for you (didn’t I already say that to your idiot friend here, why don’t atheists listen, why don’t they read before arguing? So dumb and childish and shows what a lack of patience atheists have, No wonder they are always murdering and so angry. No moron, if you wanted me to not be angry, you wouldn’t make childish conniving insults: you’d use your supposed science that only belongs to atheists. But you don’t, because you’re dumb and have anger problems with God. All the “nanny nanny boo boo I know you are but what am I”s will not save you from God’s wrath, but will only increase your pain for eternity.

      Ad hominem shows you to be the angry hypocrite, and assumptions are the dumbest logic fail of all, no wait, mere insults like, “nanny nanny boo boo are.” No wait, it’s your claim that there is no such thing as truth : ) … but if there is no truth moron, why are you telling me with your stupid insults to trust you? Dur? Reality check: When will you atheists stop contradicting yourselves, especially on something so basic and fundamental to reality? If truth doesn’t matter because it doesn’t exist, why are you attacking me moron? Why the intense conniving anger? Am I hurting you that much? Wow, my imaginary God sure made me powerful if I can hurt your mind so badly.

      So you think mass murdering atheists don’t have an anger problems yet? No no, it’s me the Christian whose put up with you morons since I was born, and for the last four years of atheist stalkers like you. Right idiot? Dur? You’re a hit and run moron because ur weak minded, so weak minded you can’t be bothered with hearing my replies and oh no getting “ANGRY” about it, cuz grrr, anger is bad, anger is a sin, anger hurts. But it’s okay to rip apart unborn babies without anesthetizing them first and massacring people who won’t follow your beliefs? Commie? You swallow billions and billions of camels yet strain at a gnat. Truth severely hurts a liar’s mind indeed when it’s condemning his love of lying.

      (Thankyou God for proving what idiotic, logic-hating hypocrites atheists are once again and for helping me to “not let the sun go down on your anger”). That’s right moron who dug a pit and rolled a boulder at me: You just said I was not a hypocrite and obeying God by being angry at hypocrites who oppose him. Thanks! : )

      “Rejoice when you are persecuted, for that is how they treated the prophets” – Jesus

      Bye bye hit and run “Fakeem” psychopath, you sure didn’t fake this Christian out. Fail. But do please keep running into God’s fist like an insane idiot child who loves punishment and making a stupid fool of himself.

      • Fakeem
        November 6, 2011 at 11:05 PM

        knight :
        Maybe you, “not judge, for with the judgement you use shall you be judged”?

        This explains why you haven’t called anyone a moron in this thread.

  10. PsyGremlin
    November 6, 2011 at 3:20 AM

    PS it’s “thief”

    Also what other world harbours life? Hint – Heaven is not a world.

    • November 6, 2011 at 8:58 AM

      If you hadn’t noticed camel swallower who strains at gnats, someone already told me that, and moron, they are TYPOS you idiot, and not correcting them cuz trolls like you said, omg i do say Jeeves u spelled wrong, moron. Hint — world doesn’t mean ROUND SPHERE IDIOT, HINT — DICTIONARY. ONCE AGAIN MORONS: STOP STRAINING AT GNATS YOU SEE ON CHRISTIANS WHILE YOU ARE ENTIRELY UNFORGIVEN AND UNDER GOD’S HATRED. HOW MANY MORE TIMES DOES THAT BASIC THING NEED TO BE POINTED OUT TO YOU? JUST LIKE GOD SAYS: BLIND, FOOLS, HYPOCRITES, DESPERATELY EVIL. And check how stupid this guy is everyone, he’s asking me the same question anothe commenter did: IDIOT DID YOU EVEN BOTHER TO READ THE COMMENTS? YET ANOTHER MORON WHO ASSUMES. FURTHER, YOU DON’T EVEN NEED TO READ THEM TO KNOW YOU’RE WRONG, READ THE ARTICLE AGAIN. Being that you atheists are THIS stupid, that’s the last comment I’ll be reading on this article. Good job idiot, you ruined it for everyone else. But, it does say a lot that none of you could refute that Carl was an intellectual thief and a hypocrite and can only argue semantics on this, or as two other apparent atheists did, make deliberately childish harassing comments and then run away like infantile morons, which is what they are so big surprise. And I’m referring to unpublished comments. So, that’s the best you morons can do. NO SCIENCE, NO LOGIC, just anger, pointing out typos as spelling mistakes (and even if I was spelling wrong, WHO CARES MORONS IF YOU’RE GOING TO HELL. AND HOW MANY ATHEISTS HAVE SAID, “U GRAMMAR NAZI, IT NOT MATTER MY GRAMMAR AS LONG AS ME CAN BE UNDERSTOOD”. I’m exagerrating but once again what’s with the double standard? Stop being hypocrites. And besides that, you have immature hatred over exposing an idol of atheism, evolutionism and Big Bangism as a fraud, liar, narcissist and hypocrite. You lost. This battle, go find another page to get worked up over, but better: stop pretending the universe made itself already.

  11. November 8, 2011 at 12:48 AM

    Clearly you’re mad because you believe the Christian Doctrine to be literal truth.

    Why would you believe this to be the case?

    • November 8, 2011 at 9:35 AM

      Try a search engine and studying the “Christian Doctrine”, also, look up the words “presumption” and “stereotypes”, instead of presuming to know merely because you carelessly listened to parrots. Or why else would you be asking unless you’d already done these things with a smug attitude?

  12. Abdul Goldstein
    November 8, 2011 at 10:04 AM

    Are you a parody of some sort, you know, like the Landover Baptist Church? Or are you some kind of blogbot?

    • November 9, 2011 at 1:31 PM

      Are atheists are a parody of humans and robots? And, no moron, I don’t know what you are thinking of. It’s bad logic and presumpteous and the sign of a careless unthinking smug babbling moron to say, “you know” over and over, you know, like Shawn Hannity? You know? You know right? And if you can’t tell if I’m a parody, like, you know, like, like Landover Baptist Church, how stupid are you, and how ineffective is that website? Like, you know, like, like man, like, dude, like did you know there are atheists so dumb, anti-clue, anti-hint, dumb (did I mention dumb), so blind, that they think Landover Baptist Church is a real Christian site? And atheists wonder why people think they are DUMB AND BLIND? All you know how to do is waste time and insult and pretend you’re moral and care about truth when clearly you are immoral, and don’t care about truth. All I’m getting are responses from atheists, as in evil idiots, and feelings bashers, which include juvenile harassment which I did not allow to be posted, but if I did, would be more evidence of what evil, illogical, hypocritical idiots you are, hypocrites with double standards, fault-finding, negative, conniving hypocrites who love to accuse theists and atheists who dare disagree with them of being what they are: evil, blind hypocrites. You’re always trying to drag them down to your immature idiotic level. No more reading what you morons have to say about this post. Bye ad hominem bots.

  13. February 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM

    To be frank, I’m a little confused about why you’re so angry (YOU are the one that has eternal bliss ahead, not me). Yes, I’m sure there were some terrible atheist leaders (one of them NOT being Hitler), but there were plenty theistic ones too. I think you would be a helluva lot more convincing if you did not show obvious hatred towards non-Christians. By doing this, your only making enemies.

    • February 15, 2012 at 10:41 PM

      “To be frank,”

      As opposed to what else, being deceptive?

      “I’m a little confused about why you’re so angry”

      Idiot did you not read that I said I would no longer take comments on this article? Either you didn’t read or you’re a stubborn idiot.


      Oh no you used caps, it’s so bad to yell, remember? Hypocrite.

      “are the one that has eternal bliss ahead, not me).”

      Moron if you bothered reading what is already here, and all over my blog, and all over the Internet, and in the Bible, if you bothered to carefully read the world’s most popular, influential, best selling, most translating, most widespread most controversial book, which it has been since the 1600’s, you might have noticed idiot, that being angry isn’t called a sin, and that it commands Christians to be angry at what is bad. And isn’t that logical? Isn’t it? TO BE ANGRY AT PEOPLE WHO DO MORALLY BAD THINGS? Or should be be psychopaths like you imply you are? Talk about blind, stupid and oblivious. SINCE THE 1600’S GUY, 400 YEARS AND YOU’RE STILL CLUELESS? So, God says he’s angry at the wicked every day, and hates sin, but you then say, “Oh you shouldn’t be angry you should be loving and at peace and happy no matter how many babies you see murdered and cut to pieces without anesthesia in the name of convenience, and “just be relaxed” despite whatever else evil is going on.” So, are you a psychopath?

      “Yes, I’m sure there were some terrible atheist leaders (one of them NOT being Hitler),”

      Why idiot would you caps NOT when it’s already obvious from the info on the net including onr my journal that Hitler was an atheist? So merely because you said “NOT” in caps, therefore he’s not one? Fallacy: emotionalism. Neither emphasizing nor shouting is evidence of what you say.

      “but there were plenty theistic ones too.”


      “I think you would be a helluva”

      Can you speak like a mature adult and not a smug psychopath narcissist who talks in a way that indicates eh thinks that brutally murdering kids with the blessing of the government and the mothers they are in and their father’s is nothing?

      “lot more convincing if you did not show obvious hatred”

      And whatever you say is obvious, and whatever you say is “hatred” is obvious and hatred because you said so. God-complex much? Fallacies committed: emotionalism, speaking for all, assuming, vague. “Hatred” again, moron, is not evil in and of itself and it has more than one meaning, so then you were being vague. I’ll show all the hatred God lets me at smug, hateful statements like yours and towards the evils of this world. God hates you and all other wicked people: “You hate all who do wrong.” Seriously, you want me to accept your, “Be calm and let anything happen, Christian,” smuggery, because, “You’re going to Heaven.”? Wow, talking about damning “Calvinists” if they do or don’t! So damn those destiny-believing Christians for not sitting down and doing nothing since they say they are destined to “eternal bliss” and damn them when they do sit and supposed do nothing while the world is sinking under water from global warming (and causing it supposedly) and for supposedly making a supposedly growing hole in the ozone decades ago so that we’re all dying now from the ozone hole? So, we must “do something” but also “stop doing nothing” because some idiots like you arbitrarily say so when you FEEL LIKE IT? Arrogant much?

      “towards non-Christians.”

      Damn those Christians for being “hateful” and never simply “angry” but only “hateful” towards non-Christians. Who cares if we atheists say we’re justa buncha helluva evolved “hairless apes” that came from “hairless monkeys” that came from uh, um, “dogs” that came from, um, “walking fish” that came from uh, “fish” that came from um, uhhhh, um, “urchins”, that came from bacteria, that came from crystals, that came from amino acids, that came from meteors, that came from a big “expansion” of um, of, uh, gravity stuff and matter and energy from no where and not from a deliberate act of God, and so was just uh, a thing that happened for no purpose. And damn them because, uh, cuz, cuz they break the Universal Arbitrary On the Fly Law of “Don’t Make Atheists Unhappy, Just Do Whatever They Say Cuz They Told You To.”

      “By doing this, your only making enemies.”

      Because you said so, and whatever you say is true Mr. I Don’t See Millions of Christians Around and I Never Heard of Anyone Becoming Religious from Listening To Arguments Against Atheists. Truly you are blind to the obvious, arrogant, evil and stupid.

  1. No trackbacks yet.
Comments are closed.
%d bloggers like this: