Home > evolution propaganda, Planet X > Massive Nemesis of Stupidity in Nonexistant Oort Cloud Threatens to Destroy Earth’s Science Even Further

Massive Nemesis of Stupidity in Nonexistant Oort Cloud Threatens to Destroy Earth’s Science Even Further

Massive Nemesis of Stupidity in Nonexistant Oort Cloud Threatens to Destroy Earth’s Science Even Further:

Massive dark object ‘lurking on edge of solar system hurling comets at Earth’
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:28 PM on 10th December 2010
Comments (190) Add to My Stories
A massive dark object may be lurking on the edge of our solar system, according to scientists. [What ‘scientists’? Not all scientists despite the implication of this immoral weasel.]

Most comets that fly into the inner solar system seem to come from the outer region of the Oort cloud [seem to who you weasel? So you speak for everyone? Arrogant.]- a region of icy dust and debris left over from the birth of the solar system [it’s an evolutionist theory, not a known real region as you imply].

The cloud starts from a point about 93 billion miles from the Sun and stretches for around three light years and contains billions of comets, most of them small and hidden [so goes the theory, liar. And if most of them are small and hidden, how do you know this cloud exists, or your “scientists” friends? Contradict yourself much Mr. Evolutionist Pretending to Be a Scholarly Scientists and Journalist?].
A Nasa graphic which illustrates how the Oort Cloud surrounds our solar system. [really? It’s from NASA, that company packed full of creationist scientists? No.] Scientists believe [what scientists you weasel? All scientists? No.] that an object with a huge mass may be pushing comets towards Earth from the cloud[.][And? We should believe with these so far unknown scientists, because? Well because you’re talking pretentiously, like you’re king of the world, and mentioned scientists all believing so and so, and you mentioned NASA, the great center of scientific mastery, which is why it still uses rocket technology from the 60’s.]
Now new calculations suggest a large object that is up to four times as big as Jupiter could be responsible for sending them in our direction. [Cool: “Now new calculations”. I’m scared. I’ve now abandoned Christianity and recalculated my life to be atheist and believe in evolution and read dailymail all day long. I’m really productive now!]

The scientists [what scientists? ‘Just have faith’ right?] have analysed the comets in the Oort cloud [you can’t analyse something that hasn’t been found] and deduced that 25 per-cent of them would need a nudge by a body of at least Jupiter size before they changed orbit. [You still haven’t explained why these scientists believe in this flying elephant planet.]

Astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire at the University of Louisiana came up with theory said that ‘something smaller than a Jovian mass would not be strong enough to perform the task’. [You still haven’t explained why these scientists believe in this flying elephant planet.]
They believe that our solar system has a hidden ‘companion’ that has so far remained undetected. [You still haven’t explained why these scientists believe in this flying elephant planet, or why I should trust in these people. Oh I know: because you called them astrophysicists. They must be trustworthy..]
The scientists [the what? Repeat that 100 times in a row to brainwash me more.] have been studying the cloud using WISE, Nasa’s infra-red space telescope that is capable of detecting dark objects. [And what did they find?]
Matese said: ‘I think this whole issue will be resolved in the next five to 10 years, [Oh, they found nothing, and yet you speak of them as having found something. You wasted my time and the time of thousands of others.] because there’s surveys coming on line that will dwarf the comet sample we have today. [Because you said so.]

‘Whether these types of asymmetries in the directions that comets are coming from actually do exist or not will definitely be hammered out by those surveys,’ Matese added. [Wait: you mean you don’t know? But this article was about you and other “scientists” knowing.] ‘We anticipate that WISE is going to falsify or verify our conjecture.’ [Wait again: I thought you were already sure and full of evidence for this imaginary cloud. And uh, so why was this invisible planet of faith brought up again? Oh: sensationalism, draw in people to read your article. Liars won’t win in end, nor thieves. ]
About 3,200 long-period comets are known, one of the most famous being Hale-Bopp which was visible to even the naked eye during 1996 and 1997. [But where’s the cloud?]
Halley’s Comet, which reappears about every 75 years, is a ‘short-period’ comet from a different part of the Solar System called the Kuiper Belt.

[…]These occasional comet showers could be why the mass extinctions on Earth are so regular, some scientists believe. [What… is this an allusion to evolution… in an astrophysics article…? No: evolutionists never use propaganda in other fields of science, they never associate things like the Big Bang with evolution and then repeatedly mock Christians by asking them why they “always talking about the Big Bang and evolution as if they have something to do with each other,”… nah: they never do that…]

The research appeared in the online edition of the journal Icarus. [Sounds sciency and cool: must be trustworthy.]
‘Most planetary scientists would not be surprised if the largest undiscovered companion was Neptune-sized or smaller, but a Jupiter-mass object would be a surprise,’ Matese told SPACE.com [And how does this person know that it’s “most scientists” who would not be surprised at this? Did he take a poll? Is there a survey on this somewhere? ]
‘If the conjecture is indeed true, the important implications would relate to how it got there — touching on the early solar environment — and how it might have affected the subsequent distributions of comets and, to a lesser extent, the known planets.’ [“early solar system environment”: How early? Are you trying to bring us back to the Big Bang? Weasel.] – Source

It occurred to me after having finished this post, and then adding the tags for it, that as I typed planet x as part of the keywords, repeatedly, realized this dailymail article and the “scientists” it quotes were trying to cash in on the Planet X scam, something which is discussed on certain radio shows and websites repeatedly, to get more visitors and more money from advertisers.

“Most of them small and hidden” indeed, just like the good deeds of these “scientists”. They are all liars, just as God said.

  1. Shannon
    December 22, 2010 at 7:03 PM

    It’s not ‘nemesis’ (enemy), dolt. It’s ‘NEXUS’ (center).



    Illiteracy fail.

    • December 22, 2010 at 8:08 PM

      No massive super moron, it’s Nemesis. On top of that infantile idiot, how does saying, “Illiteracy fail” negate my refutations of this anti-Bible propaganda, or the over 1000 pages I’ve written showing that I am not illiterate, but that morons like you are blind? So what was that about me failing at “literacy” as you imply, and what was that about me being a dolt? And ultra moron, why are you showing me dictionaries when it’s anti-Christian morons like yourself always getting basic words wrong? And how ironic, but not surprising to me who encounters bumbling idiots like you all the time: you refer to dictionaries to correct me, and got the word cited in the art wrong, while calling me a failure at literacy and a dolt. But thanks for proving God’s point, to the utter extreme. Oh one more thing self-punching idiot: why would I not be allowed to use the description Enemy of (coming from) Stupidity, to describe the fictional planet invented by your idiotic God-hating group? Is there a secret law that says: Thou shalt not use metaphors? Oh and, are you implying you can read my mind, miss “You’re substituting”? Who told you I was substituting anything? Would you like to reply to show the world further how stupid anti-Christians are? Get saved already, and if that’s no longer possible, try a mental institution.

  2. Shannon
    December 22, 2010 at 7:23 PM

    You’re substituting the word ‘Nemesis’, which means enemy, for the word ‘Nexus’, which means center.

    So please explain, is there an enemy of stupidity in the nonexistent cloud or is there a center of stupidity in it?

    Illiterate dolt.

    • December 22, 2010 at 8:18 PM

      “You’re substituting the word ‘Nemesis’, which means enemy, for the word ‘Nexus’, which means center.”,

      No hyper moron: I’m using the name given to the imaginary planet by God-hating morons like you.

      “So please explain, is there an enemy of stupidity in the nonexistent cloud or is there a center of stupidity in it?”

      Please explain why you implied in your first comment that the name is Nexus, when the “scientists” called it “Nemesis” and why in this comment you are telling me that I meant “Nexus” even though I said, “Nemesis” and though I said Nemesis, insulting me for saying there is a “center of stupidity” which you imply makes no sense. What makes no sense, is you, for insulting me for something I didn’t do, and getting the word right and assuming for no logical reason that I meant “Nexus.”

      “Illiterate dolt.”

      Just the opposite as I’ve shown by quickly dicing up your confusing, illogical, infantile, insulting stupidity. So who’s an illiterate dolt and failure at literacy again?

      May your grand display of demonic buffoonery against Christianity persuade non-Christians to turn to Christ. I hope that language was colorful enough for you, pretentious narcissist.

      And one more thing careless, assuming reader: stop being a fault-finder, stay on the subject you side-tracking weasel, and stop with the mere claims.

      God bless you, as he always does.

  3. Shannon
    December 22, 2010 at 9:43 PM

    Shall I pass you a dictionary so that you know the basic difference in definition between the two words?

    BASIC definition between nexus and nemesis?

  4. Shannon
    December 23, 2010 at 5:45 AM

    I’m not at all surprised you won’t admit your error. You wouldn’t admit that I was right about your MySpace profile, either and that you had called me names and acted like a jerk for no reason.

    A little integrity and honesty is apparently too much to ask from christians like you.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: