Home > evolution propaganda > The Enotes Evolution Hoax: Is Micro Raptor a Transitional Fossil? NO.

The Enotes Evolution Hoax: Is Micro Raptor a Transitional Fossil? NO.

A picture of a Micro raptor gui fossil, by Marjorie Lipan


From http://www.enotes.com/topic/Archaeoraptor:

paleontologist Christopher Brochu concluded in November 2001: “That birds are derived theropod dinosaurs is no longer the subject of scholarly dispute.”[29] Though playing the role of “terrestrial dinosaur” in the “Archaeoraptor” affair, Microraptor, showing wings and clear traces of rectrices, is generally assumed to have had at least a gliding capacity and is itself an excellent example of a transitional fossil.

And the word of Christopher Brochu is oh so important, because? And notice how the author or authors weaseled in after Christopher’s comment another, in such a way that it could be easily confused for his own statement? And notice the narcissistic pretentious comment, “is generally assumed”? Is generally assumed by who, oh pompous writer? And who said it’s an excellent example of a transitional fossil? And hello: how many transitional fossils exist out of trillions that are supposed to be in the ground in what was generally assumed and still is by evolutionists, to be a nice neat stratum of small to big and big to small? Just enough for one or two pages, tabled, to make it look more impressive and long, as was done on Wikipedia. But that doesn’t raise a red flag for evolutionists? Or does it, but they continue their lie. There should be just as many transitional fossils as ones which aren’t. Further, what is the evidence that micro-raptor is a transitional fossil? Oh, it’s that it has “rectrices” (a rectrice is a type of feather). But the idiot author or authors don’t other to mention that the rectrices ARE FULLY FUNCTIONAL, not TRANSITIONING. And since when is assuming anything scientific? Disgusting and stupid babble and lying is what this is. As for Christopher magically being the representative of all paleontologists, he isn’t, there is no universally elected speaker for paleontology or science, and further, truth is not determined by consensus as these evolutionists on enotes and Wikipedia and everywhere else want you to think, and many of them are bent on mind control to get the consensus they want.

From http://creationwiki.org/Archaeoraptor:

Creationists and evolutionists both agree that there are some problems with dinosaur to bird transitions. Alan Feduccia stated that there are significant differences between the embryonic thumb structure and also how the lungs are shaped. He also states that “dinosaurs have exactly the wrong anatomy for developing flight, with their large tails and hind limbs and short forelimbs”[5]

And who is Mr. Feduccia? He’s only the

S. K. Heninger Professor at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. He is an evolutionary biologist interested in vertebrate evolution, especially the origin of birds from reptiles, the origin of avian flight, and Tertiary adaptive radiation. Feduccia took his B.S. in Zoology from L.S.U., and Masters and Ph.D. from the University of Michigan. He lectured at Michigan and then taught at S.M.U. for two years before joining the University of North Carolina faculty in 1971. Feduccia’s research has taken him on numerous expeditions to Central and South America and Africa. He is the author of more than 125 scientific publications dealing primarily with the evolution of birds and other vertebrates, embryology, comparative morphology, and evolutionary systematics. His publications include some ten books (including editions & translations), and five monographs, including the internationally acclaimed and award-winning, The Age of Birds, Harvard University Press (1980), which appeared in Japanese, German and paperback editions. Reviewer comments included: “a revelation of clarity and synthesis…Feduccia–himself a leading anatomist–has brought together startling new evidence on the reptilian-avian relationship… science writing at its best,” and in 1993 the book was termed “definitive” by the New York Times.

according to http://www.bio.unc.edu/faculty/feduccia/references.htm

And from http://www.unc.edu/depts/uncspeak/feduccia.html:

Perhaps no area of evolutionary study has been more controversial than the origin of birds. While most paleontologists have advocated a dinosaurian origin, Alan Feduccia, professor and chair of the Biology Department in the College of Arts and Sciences, challenges that view. His recent fossil finds in China indicate that there was an evolution of birds before the arrival of the toothy, reptile- like Archaeopteryx, which was popularly thought to be the dinosaurian ancestor of all birds. Feduccia’s talks also cover his “big bang” theory: that about 65 million years ago most birds died with the dinosaurs, and that the ancestors of all of today’s birds evolved explosively in only about 5 to 10 million years. His latest book, The Origin and Evolution of Birds, presents his position in detail.

And according to Wikipedia:

Alan Feduccia is Alan Feduccia is a paleornithologist, specializing in the origins and phylogeny of birds. He is now Professor Emeritus at the University of North Carolina.

And from Barbara J. Stahl, anatomy professor and paleoichthyologist of Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire, wrote a book titled, Vertebrate History: Problems in Evolution. She said,

“In the absence of fossil evidence, paleontologists can say little about the date at which these sixty-nine living families of Passeri-formes… appeared”. (You can read about Passeriformes here).

Why didn’t the authors of enotes note any of these opposing claims from high prominent mainstream evolutionists? They didn’t because they are biased hypocrites who love lies, hate God, and therefore the truth, because God is the source of truth, always says what is true, and the closest thing to living truth.

Related Articles:

Ornithologist and Evolutionary Biologist Alan Feduccia—Plucking Apart the Dino-Birds (published by Discover Magazine on 2/1/2003)

150 Years Later, Fossils Still Don’t Help Darwin (published by ICR on 3/2/2009)

  1. October 15, 2017 at 1:26 PM

    Believe in whatever ya want, but don’t do the rest of us shame by rubbing it on us…

    Most likely ya don’t even understand the concept of evolution, so your argument is bogus…

    • February 12, 2018 at 10:35 AM


      Why would you have to guess, smug moron? Moron you obviously don’t take reality seriously or truth or morality otherwise moron you’re first sentence wouldn’t begin with a careless attitude, smugness and an insult, which isn’t conducive to truth, but telling wastes of life like you that you are useless and not worth anyone’s attention. That’s why I didn’t read past your first sentence. See how counter productive your hate for reality is Mr. Guesses? Stop guessing, stupid, and start learning. Too bad you hate reality. And moron: try your own babble out on yourself first, if it doesn’t prove anything to you, why would you think it would on you? Blind to reality? Bye magical random minded idiot. Pssst: Lemme know when you’ve seen something evolve, let alone hung around a billion years to see it, reality hating crazy extremist weirdo with crazy arguments and copy cat insults from those who rightly use them on you all the time, I guess.

    • February 12, 2018 at 10:49 AM

      If God tells me to repeatedly stomp on your head especially because you’re a self centered arrogant hypocrite who won’t obey Him and because you love being evil and chaotic and can hardly recognize right from wrong, should I tell God, “no, that worm will say I rubbed him, and I’ll feel bad”? Idiot.

      “Us”? Moron there’s millions of Christians, so makny millions you’d never count them all, so who is “us” you ignoramus oblivious smug fool? Yes idiot there’s more morons like you then “us”, but so what? You dumb turd what matters is WHAT IS THE TRUTH: IS YOUR DUMB PATHETIC LAZY MINDED TURD SELF GOING TO HELL AND SHOULD YOU WORSHIP GOD, WHAT MATTERS IS WHAT IS TRUTH, NOT “OOOO YOU RUBBINGS US”, and like someone forced you to reas this. What do you think of morons like you, Nazis and Nazi sympathizers like yourself rubbing Hell and death on Jews and Christians who refused to persecute them? You know nothing about rubbing, smug guy. Stop being a smug wandering fool and take pain and death and truth seriously, you clearly don’t, so stop pretending to care.

  2. The Reaver of Darkness
    October 31, 2017 at 12:21 AM

    I guess reality angers you. How sad. Your article is a laughably pitiful attempt at debunking evidence when you don’t even check your facts first. Where do I begin? Well, for starters, all fossils are transitional. But I’m not going to waste my time doing your research when you clearly don’t want to take all of five minutes to check Wikipedia or Google for more than two pages of transitional fossils; you’d rather assume there aren’t any and leave it at that.

    P.S.: Even if there were only two pages of transitional fossils, wouldn’t that still pretty much corroborate evolution and debunk creationism?

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: