Mainstream Science: A Polluted Crowded Stream of Quacks and Cracked Pots

Mainstream scientists (macro-evolution-believing scientists) are blind and dumb in many ways and in many ways promote an anti-science, for example, many of them discourage people from making anti-gravity starships cheaply. Michio Kaku is such a scientist as is one he discussed on a a Coast to Coast AM show a few months ago, Holger Bech Nielsen, of the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, whom he said was his friend on that same show, and concerning his claim that nature was (intelligently) preventing the Large Hadron Collider from working, sometimes said crazy things like that. And notice on the linked article that Niels promotes the pagan idea of “luck”, which isn’t scientific at all. I wondered long before the show if this mainstream scientist was joking, but Michio with his statement, and no one saying that this scientist was joking, confirmed that he seriously believed nature (meaning every physical thing in the universe as a whole, except spiritual things, which would include spirits and information) had intelligence (which is a spiritual thing) could, he implied, use some brain or brains somewhere and other parts of itself to prevent the LHC from working. If you didn’t notice, to say say that nature can think or have intent without intelligence, is a contradiction. Nothing can’t think without intelligence, and intelligence requires another spiritual thing to exist: a mind.

I also listened to Michio on Coast to Coast AM yesterday, being interviewed poorly and annoylingly by Art Bell, a moron mostly, on civilization classifications: a “type 0” vs type 1, 2, 3 and 4 civilizations. Michio was being an idiot by claiming that civilizations that could make wormholes/stargates wouldn’t need starships and used the Borg and Stargate (the Ancients in Stargate?) as examples of types of civilizations that didn’t need starships. Is he a massive moron? How did he miss that the Borg travel in starships as did the Enterprise and Voyager using quantum tunneling and the Defiant and other ships through the artificial wormhole near the DS9 space station? What idiot thinks that just because you can make a wormhole that you won’t need an artificial environment to protect yourself from unknown conditions? What is the evidence that if you can make a wormhole, or time travel that you will instantly be able to survive or live comfortably in whatever environment is on the other side? What does one have to do with the other? And what’s his excuse for spreading such stupidity when the very sci-shows he cited made it obvious as to why starships (and spacesuits) would still be necessary? Michio is implying that if you can make a wormhole you’ll be God basically, which is making an idol of wormhole technology and/or whoever builds them – bizarre. It’s common sense from the experience we have that just because you have an advanced technology doesn’t mean you won’t need a less advanced technology as a back up or an alternative one as a back up or to make the advanced technology more easy to use. According to Michio, along with wormhole technology would come technology that would be able to be integrated into our bodies that would automatically make it so we could withstand any environment. I’m making an educated guess, that according to Michio, if you can make a wormhole, you will have mobile computer or computers and technology of some kind, like nano-robots or some robot that can manipulate matter and energy in any way, that can instantly or very quickly come up with technology and materials and energy to change your body or make a suit for it (or both) that can allow it to live in any environment with your brain still being able to work decently. But what is the evidence for that? It’s an assumption, and assuming is for idiots. Stargate and Star Trek made is easy to see why that even with wormhole technology you would still need artificial environments, both suits and ships, to survive and live comfortably: because people that have it or who are using it aren’t automatically technologically advanced enough to instantly survive and live comfortably wherever and whenever and don’t know the future perfectly. On both shows, it was shown that even with the ability to time travel, life was still unpredictable, and there were already well-known books out that made it clear why time travel wasn’t a solve-it-all technology, for example one book introduced the butterfly effect, which is a small indirect effect made in the past from a change to the past that causes a great change in the future.

Art asked Michio if he thought Genesis (the first book of the Bible, the first parts of Genesis roughly 6000 years old) was compatible with science, and Michio acknowledged that it was, saying (in a way) that it was scientific (I’d bet Michio read some of the books on the history of Christianity listed at or had heard from me, maybe indirectly that The Book of Judges teaches the scientific method), but without evidence, referred to it as “myths”. Michio again referred to Einstein as he usually does to give his opinion about God’s role in the creation of the universe, but this time he was much more bold, and said that many scientists could see beauty in the laws of the universe and that the beauty of various mathematical formulas were so beautiful to him, that he was almost brought to tears over them, as evidence that the universe wasn’t an accident. In other words: the beauty of the information in the universe is evidence of a creative act, and a creative act is evidence of intelligence, and this is just what the Bible, supposed myths according to scientists like Michio, said, thousands of years ago, more than once:

To the Chief Musician. A Psalm of David: The heavens declare the glory of God; and the expanse proclaims His handiwork. Day to day pours forth speech, and night to night reveals knowledge. There is no speech nor are there words; their voice is not heard. Their line has gone out through all the earth and their words to the end of the world. In them He has set a tabernacle for the sun, and he comes forth as a bridegroom from his canopy; he rejoices as a strong man to run a race, going forth from the end of the heavens, and its course is to their ends. And there is nothing hid from its heat. The Law of Jehovah is perfect, converting the soul; the testimony of Jehovah is sure, making the simple wise. – Psalm 19:1-7 (Notice that after the handiwork descriptions, that God’s Law’s are mentioned?

“For the wrath of God is revealed from Heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because the thing which may be known of God is clearly revealed within them, for God revealed it to them. For the unseen things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being realized by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, for them to be without excuse. Because, knowing God, they did not glorify Him as God, neither were thankful. But they became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man, and birds, and four-footed animals, and creeping things.” – Romans 1:18-1:23

Does Michio also find the main laws in the Bible, like the “ten (twelve) commandments” and the two highest, beautiful? If not, why?

And who is a great nation whose statutes and judgments are so righteous as all this Law which I set before you today?:

1) I am Jehovah your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods besides Me.

2) You shall not make a graven image for you, any likeness of anything that is in the heavens above, or in the earth beneath, or in the waters beneath the earth.

3) You shall not bow yourself down to them, nor serve them. For I Jehovah your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the sons to the third and fourth generation of those who hate Me, and doing mercy to thousands of those who love Me and keep My commandments.

4) You shall not take the name of Jehovah your God in vain, for Jehovah will not acquit the one who takes His name in vain.

5) Keep the sabbath day to sanctify it, as Jehovah your God has commanded you. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day shall be the sabbath of Jehovah your God. In it you shall not do any work, you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your manservant, nor your maidservant, nor your ox, nor your mule, nor any of your cattle, nor your stranger inside your gates, so that your manservant and your maidservant may rest like yourself. And remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and Jehovah your God brought you out from there with a mighty hand and with a stretched-out arm. Therefore Jehovah your God commanded you to keep the sabbath day.

7) Honor your father and your mother, as Jehovah your God has commanded you, so that your days may be made longer, and that it may go well with you in the land which Jehovah your God gives you.

8) You shall not murder,

9) and you shall not commit adultery,

10) and you shall not steal,

11) and you shall not bear false witness against your neighbor,

12) and you shall not lust after your neighbor’s wife, nor shall you crave your neighbor’s house, his field, or his manservant, or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or any thing that is your neighbor’s.

Oh that there were such a heart in them that they would fear Me and keep all My commandments always, so that it might be well with them and with their sons forever! – Deuteronomy 4:8, 5:6-21, 29

“hearing that [Jesus] had silenced the Sadducees, the Pharisees were gathered together. Then one of them, a lawyer, asked, tempting Him, and saying, ‘Master, which is the great commandment in the Law?’ Jesus said to him, ‘”You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.” That is the first and great commandment and the second is like it, ‘”You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”‘ On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.” – Matthew 22:35-40

It’s no surprise to me that the “mainstream” is the bad and heavily polluted stream (that has on its tail many millions of magic-believing pagans pandering to it) in contrast to the stream less traveled steam of Christ:

“Go in through the narrow gate, for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many there are who go in through it because narrow is the gate and constricted is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it. Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” – Matthew 7:13-15

It’s good that Michio, a very intelligent person and prestigious scientist, acknowledges the value of the Bible, even seeing that it is scientific (though I’m not sure why he said that), but sad that he assumes it is myths and shamefully just referred to the whole thing as myth when most archaeologists of the Bible know that at least half of it is fact, even the atheists of the Jesus Seminar acknowledge that half of it is historical fact. Michio should stop obsessing on himself and physics so that he can learn the greater truths.

Author: Optimix

This is the gospel, that Christ Yeshua was crucified for sinners as I have been. I was saved and went astray and Yeshua lead me back.

12 thoughts on “Mainstream Science: A Polluted Crowded Stream of Quacks and Cracked Pots”

  1. All I can say is a big THANK YOU for writing this. I used to study as a physicist and so have become somewhat endeared to the profession. When I listen to the Michio I just wish he was not a representative of the physics community. Any physicist that talks about worm holes is not someone worth listening to because you know that they have fallen for a same mistake that is nearly universal to all crack-pot physics. When Einstein described the effects of general relativity and related it to warping space into a forth dimension that was merely a model but they took it literally. There are several ways to describe the situation without involving a non existent dimension. Non of them are literally right but are good for visualizing an effect. All most all modern physics requires similar false models for describing what we can not see, simply to aid our conceptual thinking. Incorrect thinking starts when a physicist believes that this is what is really happening.

    1. I never thought I’d get a reply like that. There was a show that Michio did on religious beliefs that a harassing commenter on here tried to show me, but his intolerable mocking prevented me from being able to tolerate watching the video and linking to it. But I planned on adding it to the article soon as a reference and seeing if there were any mistakes in his logic. I would like to to write about physics, specifically Einstein and other things, but lest I give an advantage in science to the enemies of the Church, I stay silent about it. I mean that certain theories if they were accepted might lead others to new types of stealth and precision weaponry, and I don’t want to contribute to that. I’ll try to tell you something in private though.

  2. Hi. Me again. I didn’t even realize this was a religious article but hey, I’m religious too. I’m just wondering which translation you use. I’ve never studied too much on the different translations but I just noticed differing reasoning behind the Sabbath. It seems like rather than just a difference in translations one of the two translations has completely rewritten the Torah.

    1. There are many translations and the same meaning can be gotten usually from all of them, even if one is not as accurate as another translation, like says, “kill” vs” “murder” when the word murder should have been used, if you understand the context or someone told you what was specifically meant, then the inaccurate translation won’t be able to mislead as easily. I’ve studied the MKV, NKJV, KJV, ESV, LITV, NIV, and some others, and from comparing them and studying the definitions of the words using Strong’s Concordance and modern English dictionaries, and a little of Smith’s Dictionary (because usually I don’t use the KJV except when I am unsure if a translation is correct in any of the modern ones) I know what translation is most accurate even if for convenience I just use the NIV. I can also sense when a translation isn’t right if a sentence doesn’t make sense (which I learned can happen if the translators just decide to translate literally and also realized can happen if they decided to give up on what a verse meant). Since one translation is perfect, I use, for now e-sword with the EMTV, ESV, GNT, ISV, KJV, and LITV. I’d use maybe two or three other electronic Bibles for e-sword but I can’t afford it, especially after the great theft of my property last month. If you study the different translations carefully you will see what the main differences are. The worst translation is from the Watch Tower Bible from the Jehovah’s Witnesses cult and I suspect another bad one is some modern Aramaic translation Bible I found some years ago, I think in 2003 or 2005. I often will read the words in the original Greek, Hebrew or Aramaic to see if a translation is correct before publishing it, and if I see an inaccuracy I will improve the translation.

  3. I’m a bit late to the hunt, so to speak, but I appreciate this article as well.

    It seems painfully obvious to me that many scientists today have tossed aside the most empirical observation of all – the sensation of change and becoming. Einstein may have dismissed it as an illusion, and modern relativists have all but denied cause and effect in their block universe theories (while idiotically attempting to have their cause and effect cake as they eat it). Those of us with common sense have no choice but to sit by and think that the modern crisis in physics can be tragically seen as modern version of the Tower of Babel. Only this time around it’s the Tower of Babble.

    Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote that upon his massive reflection of the events in 20th century Russia, the best explanation for the atrocities that occurred was that “man had forgotten God”. This is exactly what has happened to modern physics as well, and we’re all the poorer for it.

    1. What do you mean by “the sensation of change and becoming”? That has nothing to do with science. And can’t you hear how New Agey you sound by saying “sensation” as if that vague talk is something profound? And what makes it an “empirical observation”?! We’re changing all the time, it’s nothing to report on the news that you’ve merely “changed” somehow or “became” some vague new thing because, for example, a molecule in your body got replaced by another, or merely because you got a little cut on your skin. You’ve given me a mess of high words.

  4. Lost me at “macro-evolution-believing scientists” – because the idea that there’s some clear delineation between micro and macro, what can (and has been observed to) happen over relatively short periods of time, and what that can amount to over hundreds of millions of years is dumb. “Only a religious diehard could believe it”-grade dumb.

    1. Learn what logical fallacies are, despite having edu at the end of your email, you’re obviously not educated in logic. You made a begging the question fallacy by simply ending your claim with “is dumb”, (something I can repeat back to you, yet you were too dumb to realize that – would that make me the right one if I said, “Well ur just dumb, you lost me”?) and then making a stupid logical fallacy by making an ad hominem attack with no justification, and bigoted (stereotypes being another logical fallacy if it isn’t true) and another logical fallacy by being vague. In today’s culture when someone attacks a religious person, it’s usually from an atheist or agonostic or a new ager who merely claims to be spiritual. Since you’re email ends in edu, I’m guessing you’re an atheist or agnostic, now where such people often go wrong in their attack on religion, is that they fail to see their own religious or quasi religious beliefs, their own “blind faith”. Since my blog is filled with thorough replies to people like you who have made similar fallacious comments, what amount to little hit and run comments that prove nothing, I’m not going to bother saying much more to you, since it’s you who are stupid, and any idiot can read the ultra super dumbness that comes from the mouth of an atheist and read all about their decades of mass murders going into the millions. Simply: you’re an arrogant and hypocritical ignoramus who thinks he knows what he’s talking about, but is a hypocritical ignoramus. Study more, study carefully. You’re comment is hypocritical, and you are a stupid and stubborn hypocrite.

      “Ignore arguments of ignorance.” – The apostle Paul.

    2. Oh and, not only is my blog filled with thorough replies to people like yourself already, but also has plenty of articles refuting you, as does the rest of the Internet in massive numbers. You’re without excuse, hence: stubborn and arrogant. Stop being addicted to your feelings and being mentally lazy, work hard, stop being resentful and presuming things.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: