Bill Gates’ Global Warming Propaganda Speech Refuted
In February, 2010, Bill Gates rushed a speech at the TED building which I’ve made evident below. What makes it relevant is that his speech was classic propaganda, and that even with his great riches, “all the money in the world” figuratively speaking, his speech was childish and it showed that his wisdom was shallow, having diminished over the years. Yes, he succeeded in becoming a very rich man, the richest for many years, but that wasn’t all due to his wisdom, and especially not due to any righteous words and behavior, but in large part from having had access to his parent’s riches and being a money-hoarding, pushy schemer (2) and (hypocritical (2)).
Whether he realized he was pitching propaganda or not, I don’t know, but that is what it was. It seems to me that someone coached him in what to say, to help him continue to be on the world stage in a positive light, no doubt to try and dwarf his history of failures (the biggest of which was his, and to this day, for no apparent logical reason, allowing at least twenty-five highly efficiency-sapping annoyances in Windows XP, Vista and 7 (and here is a security major flaw that I just discovered which was recently discovered to affect nearly all Windows OS’s: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/windows-7-dos-security-flaw,9477.html).
The speech appears to propaganda because it is dumbed down so that even children can understand it, contains simplistic lies (insulting ones), for example that make it appear as if all the top scientists in the world are in agreement with what he’s saying, which is an easily discovered lie.
Now why was his simpleton speech aimed at adults? Perhaps it was to make it look like his speech wasn’t a simplistic one meant for kids, but for adults. The main target audience must have been young adult teens, or a little older than 19, and the elderly being that people in their 20’s and up to 65 already know the line “C02 bad, makes Earth hot, ice melt, polar bears die, penguins drown, world sinks under wadder. Dis is bad.” Teens are usually to busy doing stupid things to care to remember words like C02 and the elderly, suffering from senility often and major fatigue would be likely to forget it to, and being that everyone knows Bill Gates is a billionaire (which is rare and something most people wish they were) and both a failure and a success, would be likely to at least see a partial transcript of his speech passed down by someone who was interested in what he had to say, like me. By the time I realized there was a transcript with the video’s page, I had made my own unique one, but that saves me from having to deal with copyright attacks.
Either he is severely out out of touch with reality (so that he doesn’t realize that most Westerner’s already know the basics), or didn’t realize he was being deceived into targeting teens and the elderly, that is my educated opinion.
He also, as you may have heard by now, seemed to accidentally admit that vaccines were meant to reduce the human population of the world. What would he say to make it appear as if that wasn’t what he meant, or what whoever crafted the speech for him meant. I’m thinking… Ok, now I remember what I was trying to remember: That people who are healthy and prosperous don’t have as many kids because they don’t need anyone to take care of them right away, and vaccines are supposed to make you healthier. However, during the part of that speech that he said that, the audience laughed at an interesting moment, which indicates like I said, that his audience was already informed about global warming and alleged overpopulation, especially being that they laughed at a moment that indicated they were thinking about genocide or something like it. Read and watch the video for yourself if you don’t believe me.
Here were the most relevant parts showing the childish, time-wasting, simplicity, claims without evidence, and the “top scientists are whoever I think they are” lines:
… The climate is getting worse, means that many years, their crops won’t grow. … And that leads to starvation… And so the climate changes, will be terrible for them. … Also, the price of energy is very important to them. … Advanced civilization, uh is based on advances in energy. … But, as we make it cheaper,
(takes a breath and looks worried as he starts to say): we need to meet a new constraint. And that constraint, has to do with, C02. C02, is warming the planet. Aaand, thee equation on C02, is actually euh, uh very straight forward one.
Bill helps us masses of simpleton idiots to finally understand what C02 does with this
simple picture, which is clear scientific proof that much C02 is very negative,
so negative in fact that Earth will turn into Mars in just 40 years,
at which point Windows XP will lose any chance of ever being fixed.
If you sum up, the C02, that gets emitted, that leads to temperature uh increase. And that temperature increase, leads to some very negative effects. The effects on the weather, ump perhaps worse than the indirect effects, in that, uh theih natural ecosystems can’t adjust (said adjust with emphasis) to these rapid changes, and so you get ecosystems collapses. Now the exact amount, of how you map fromuh uh, certain increase in of C02, to what temperature will be and where the positive feedbacks are, there’s some uncertainty there, but not very much. And there’s shertainly uncertainty about how bad those effects would be, but they will be extremely bad.
I asked the top scientists in this several times, “Do we really have to get down, to near zero, can’t we just you know cut in half or in a quarter, and the answer is that until we get near to zero,
the temperature will continue to rise. …
And somehow we have to make changes, that will bring that (C02) down to zero. … So we have to go from rapidly rising, to falling, and falling all the way to zero. … Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero. Uh thats… (audience makes long laugh) Uh first we’ve got population. … that’s headed up to about 9 billion. … Now if we do a really great job sooon, new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that perhaps by 10 or 15 percent, but there we see an increase [in population at the same time] of uh about 1.3 [percent]. (end)
After his stupid speech, he did a Q & A with an ugly middle-aged Irish person with a gay lisp (no doubt to me so that Bill would be appealing to gays and foreigners and so that his speech would seem to be of worldwide importance). That he chose an Irish person was extremely stupid, because Ireland has one of the smallest populations in the world of any country except tiny islands. It only has about four million people and has an area of 42,712 sq miles: a much population smaller than the poor African country Benin, which has 7.1 million people and is only a little larger in size at 43,483 square miles (771 square miles more). On top of that, Ireland’s population is in severe decline. The last thing they need is Bill’s vaccines.
Here is a plain contradiction that Bill made, showing that he is lying:
Now the exact amount, of how you map fromuh uh, certain increase in of C02, to what temperature will be and where the positive feedbacks are, there’s some uncertainty there, but not very much. And there’s [c]ertainly uncertainty about how bad those effects would be, but they will be extremely bad.
Besides the grammar slips, what matters most is that he said there uncertainty about how bad the effects would be, but in the next half of his short sentence says it will specifically be “extremely bad” not, “but it could be extremely bad”. So which is it: it might be bad or extremely bad?
In addition to that, Bill is either ignorant about nuclear power generators or is lying, since there are nuclear generators that don’t put out weaponizable waste, and are virtually clean power generators.
And what is he talking about when he says that ecosystems could be destroyed by the drastic weather changes: Hello Bill: ever heard of a sunny day suddenly turning rainy, or snow appearing in large amounts where there was no snow? How about giant-sized-hail showers? How about hurricanes, monsoons, floods and large forest fires? Does the plant like all just suddenly disappear never to return because of those things? When a volcano erupts and pours lava everywhere, does it stay barren of life forever? And are any of those events gradual weather changes? Obviously not, and yet he wants us all to worry and spend our hard earned money to prevent GRADUAL whether changes in which the temperature rises one or two degrees over 100 to 1000 years, which according to Darwinists, all living things would adapt to and become more complex allowing them to have greater intelligence! So these Darwinists, like Bill Gates, are blind, confused, liars, and want us to fight against evolution, the very thing they make out to be a god!
He also gave us a deadline, forty years (global warmers think 40 years is sudden?), which was very important since it gives those who are truly concerned about the truth a way to test if whether or not what these false prophets are giving us accurate prophecies, or lies.
Near the end of his speech he said that the “R & D is ridiculously underfunded”. Hey billionaire: put your money where your begging the poor to stop breathing (and in so doing kill off most of the plant life) is. Put up the bulk of your own money and hoarded charity money, then you can preach to the poor masses you believe are beneath you in all their wisdom. They were “smart enough” to buy your Hellish junk weren’t they? Junk you couldn’t be bothered to improve, but fobbed off on idiots who carried over many of the same problems from your older operating systems and introduced new ones from Hell. Here is the video source of Bill’s semi-rant.
So this is the result of turning away from God, the source of truth: believing lies, lying, and until you become insane from the confusion that results in having to filter out your own lies.
A rich man may be wise in his own eyes,
but a poor man who has discernment sees through him.