Home > Michio Kaku > What Does Michio Kaku Believe and Can He Be Believed?

What Does Michio Kaku Believe and Can He Be Believed?

Post link: http://michiokaku.tk

According to Michio Kaku, about 30% of scientists (polled since WWII) are religious and believe in God. He also believes that the Bible is scientific (Coast to Coast AM interview), good. Some quotes from him:

What was God thinking when the universe was created? That’s where we are going with this thing [the super collider]. … The universe… is quite beautiful… it could have been random… it could have been horrible… that’s what Einstein believed. 11:51-11:52 P.M., 1/29/2010, Coast to Coast A.M.. his reply to the host Art Bell

“God throws dice, what can I say?”- Michio Kaku, 12:41 P.M., 1/29/2010, Coast to Coast A.M.

When scientists use the word God, they usually mean the God of Order. For example, one of the most important revelations in Einstein’s early childhood took place when he read his first books on science. He immediately realized that most of what he had been taught about religion could not possibly be true. Throughout his career, however, he clung to the belief that a mysterious, divine Order existed in the universe. His life’s calling, he would say, was to ferret out his thoughts, to determine whether he had any choice in creating the universe. Einstein repeatedly referred to this God in his writings, fondly calling him “the Old Man.” When stumped with an intractable mathematical problem, he would often say, “God is subtle, but not malicious. – Hyperspace : A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the 10th Dimension, Page: 331

They [science and religion] can be in harmony, but only if rational people on both sides engage in honest debate. Einstein believed in two types of Gods, for example. He did not believe in a personal God, or a God of intervention. He did not believe that God answered our prayers. But he did believe that there was a God of Spinoza. This is the God of Harmony. He said we are like children entering a huge library for the first time, not knowing how to read the thousands of books that are beyond our understanding. Many scientists, therefore, might say that they believe in a God of harmony. For example, scientists believe in a Big Bang that started the universe. But then we have to ask what happened before the Big Bang (more on that later). Then we have to ask where the laws of physics came from. Personally, I think that the laws of physics are the only ones possible, that all other laws are mathematically inconsistent. Thus, God probably had no choice in creating the universe, as Einstein believed. – Kaku’s response in a chatroom to the user FifthDream, who asked him, “Dr. Kaku, what is your opinion on science and religion? Are the two in opposition or can there be harmony?”, 2003

To Michio: you’re always speaking behind Einstein when it comes to whether or not you believe in the God of the Bible or not, or a God who cares about his creation or ever intervenes or whether or not he predestined what will be. Please don’t do this, just say what you believe. Are you afraid of being wrong or ridiculed or discriminated against by the majority of so called “mainstream scientists”? People will ridicule you too, and probably have, for not speaking plainly. Though Jesus often spoke in riddles (and often only implied things) he gave explanations for much of what he said. And if he didn’t, other parts of the Bible usually explain, but where is the information to let us know what you believe about God? Talk about yourself for once, not Einstein, who’s Relativity Theory was wrong.

Update: 2/6/2011 10:20 AM:

Seeing that many people are still looking at this post since I posted it, I decided to watch an uploaded video on Youtube, a segment of a BBC documentary that a rude commenter had pointed out to me last year, but which out of resentment I ignored for a while. But I watched it a few minutes ago and transcribed the parts most relevant to this post:

Michio: “I imagine that eternal life was a powerful incentive for people who worshiped here (Well’s Cathedral). … The problem today though, is tIhat many of us is more skeptical. To get everlasting life in heaven, you have to trust that heaven actually exists. Speaking as a scientist, I think that there is a problem with regards to the afterlife and religious immortality, and that is there’s no proof that it exists. Remarkable claims require remarkable proof. But maybe, you don’t need proof. Well, I do.” – Micho Kaku, BBC Video: There Here After. ”

Later in the video, Michio tours the Grand Canyon with some old male geologist who claimed that “they” (who?) said that it took the stream (the one that usually goes through the Grand Canyon) “5 million years” to carve it out. Michio, after leaving him then said as a wide screen shot of the canyon was being shown, “Unimaginable eons of time are needed for water to carve out valleys.”

How in the world did he miss that the Bible says a worldwide disaster occurred which included it being completely flooded? Not only that, why didn’t he mention floods at all???????? Don’t floods also carve out things and make rapid changes? Doesn’t a constant downpour of rain erode certain hills and mountains and cliffs which have countless times caused devastating mudslides? What a big oversight. Then I found from a video to the side of that one, on Youtube, what after transcribing, was an interview from a beautiful woman named Dr. Kiki:

Dr. Kiki: “…those big questions, theoretical physicists seem to come up those, throughout their entire careers”

Michio: “That’s why I became a theoretical physicist. I wanted to bump up against those big questions.”

Dr. Kiki: “…constantly.”

Michio: “…and so, I mean that’s another question I was really interested in, is that.

Dr. Kiki: “I’ve heard that the majority of, theoretical physicists, are, incredibly spiritual, and, have, a great appreciation for, the concept of consciousness and the soul and the universe and where it came from because these are the questions which they’re constantly, asking. Um, for yourself, how do you, how do you, what’s your view on, life, and, you know, where is it, what are you doing when you teleport. life, if we ever get to that point.”

Michio: “Uh well if I knew the answer to, to life I would have inside track up there (he laughs while motioning with his hand with a thumbs up to Heaven). Uh but let me tell you how we, we, we physicists view things, right. For example, um, Einstein was asked the big question, ‘Is there a God is there a meaning to everything?’ right?”

Dr. Kiki: “Right.”

Michio: “And here’s how Einstein answered the question: He said there really are two kinds of God’s, we have to be very scientific, we have to dih- define what you mean by, ‘God’. If God is the God of intervention, the personal God, the God of prayer, the God that parts the waters, then he had a hard time believing in that, would God listen to all our prayers for, a bicycle for Christmas, and, smite the Philistines for me please (points in front of him as if pointing to them). He didn’t think so, however he believed in the God of order, harmony, beauty, simplicity and elegance; the God of Spinoza. That’s the God that he believed in, because he thought the universe was so gorgeous. It didn’t have to be that way, it could have been chaotic, it could have been ugly, messy. But here we have the fact that all the equations of physics, can be placed on a simple sheet of paper.”

Dr. Kiki: “Right.”

Michio: “Einsteins equation is only, one inch long (makes a inch length with his index finger and thumb of his right hand).”

Dr. Kiki: “Mmmm hmmm.”

Michio: “And the quantum theory is about a yard long(,) but you can squeeze it, on, to, uh, a sheet of paper (the intervew and Michio laugh).”

Dr. Kiki: “Right(,) with a small enough font.”

Michio: “Right. And with string theory you can even put those equations together. And string theory can be, squeezed into an equation one inch long (makes the inch length with his right hand again).”

Dr. Kiki: “Hmm. (with an upward tone).”

Michio: “And that equation by the way is my equation (laughs a little and widens his eyes), that’s string field(?) theory.

Dr. Kiki: “Nice.”

Michio: “That’s my contribution.”

Dr. Kiki: “Right.”

Michio: “But we wanna know, well where did that equation come from, you know? This is what Einstein asked, uh, ‘Did God have a choiccce. Was there any choice in building a universe.’ When he woke up in the morning he would say(,) he would say, ‘I’mwanna create a universe(,) I’m gonna be God today. What kind of universe would I create.'” Then Michio quickly said, “This is how he (Einstein) created much of his theories.”

Note: The interview was casual, Michio was confident, barely nervous-sounding if at all, didn’t have perhaps but a hint of boastfulness which at most was when he credited himself with the invention of string field theory, and it was fast-paced.

After typing this up I looked to see when this interview had been made, and at http://www.twis.org/2010/05/14/462 found this comment (which seems to confirm that Michio said “field” where I put the question mark):

Posted August 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM

Kaku, as usual, is being dishonest when he takes credit for contributing the equation for string field theory!

Light-cone string field theories were introduced by Stanley Mandelstam and developed by Mandelstam, Michael Green, John Schwarz and Lars Brink. An explicit description of the second-quantization of the light-cone string was given by Michio Kaku and Keiji Kikkawa. (From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_field_theory).

I didn’t find out when the Kiki interview was made, but the interview on Youtube which I transcribed, above, was uploaded in April, 2009.

Here’s a video on Youtube in which Michio Kaku says that those who are opposed to the NWO are terrorists.

Related articles:

More on Michio Kaku’s Character Creationism and String Field Theory Controversy

Who Invented String Theory?

Mainstream Science: A Polluted Crowded Stream of Quacks and Cracked Pots

  1. Cody Peterson
    October 29, 2010 at 12:21 AM

    Trolling Back in here on your continued fascination with Michio Kaku. Obviously you want at least one credited scientist on your team, but I don’t think you will get it. (Also yeah the last post was a bit lengthy I don’t think I would have read the whole thing either but i wouldn’t say it is childish. You are the one who believes in the boogey man.) Listen if you, watch or listen to enough of his stuff, he obviously couldn’t care less about religion. I think he “hides”, as you call it, behind Einstein because he is one person who put away his feelings for science and reached across the table.

    Most Scientist have given up trying to work with religion. They dealt with it during the dark ages and were tortured for it and they are chastised if they come out and say GOD is probably not real.So i believe the majority of them are finished trying to help you people. If you really want to know what he thinks watch his stuff you will pick up on it quickly if you watch about a forth of his material. If you can read he has books too.

    PS god (yes I lower cased it) If he is indeed real, is a jealous sadistic dictating prejudice racist. The christian god that is, others are very much the same.

    There was once an indigenous man in South America when the Conquistadors came over who was tied to a post for a burning. The Missionary explained to him briefly as best he could about Hell, jesus, Heaven, etc.. the whole shebang. Then he asked the native, “Do you accept our god as yours.” (something around those lines). The native asked, “Are there other Christians in heaven.” The missionary answered, “Of course!!”. The native replied kindly, “I’d rather not”.

    Even if the story isn’t real, which I think it isn’t, It brings up a good point. Why would I want to live with the likes of crusading murderers, rapists, torturers, pedophiles, and racists. Doesn’t make sense to me.

    You can verify me, by my E-Mail, I will definitely be looking forward to your next post. Hey at least I’m reading it right.

    Also Einstein was Michio’s Role Model. That’s why he talks of him so often.

    • October 29, 2010 at 1:41 PM

      Trolling Back in here on your continued fascination with Michio Kaku.

      I’m not fascinated with him, the world is (and many false Christians I’m sure, who are apart of the world though many can also be considered apart of The Church, though are not permanent members in the long run), and so I wrote about him. Also because he is a spokesperson for the mainstream scientific group in general, and they accept him as such, and he makes himself a speaker for all scientists, as I pointed out, and LIES, and hides the truth, I expose clearly his errors, and correct and rebuke him as the Bible requires. I also find it personally upsetting for someone to speak for me when they are against my religion.

      Obviously you want at least one credited scientist on your team,

      Wow: I point out his error of speaking for all scientists (or was that not pointed out in this article) and I point out throughout my journal there are MANY Christian scientists and who are the originators of science (God was first) and who carried it out mainly, till atheists hijacked it and twisted it and make it appear as if there are no Christian ones now, and you repeat the offense, that ignorant claim, and a common sense ignorant claim: do seriously think all scientists are atheists or irreligious, and when such are a small percentage of the world, and when common sense would say they are not all scientists? According to you then there a tiny amount of scientists in the world and all are irreligious. That’s extreme ignorance and lack of common sense!

      but I don’t think you will get it.

      Did you not read what Michio said about the Bible which I quoted him as saying? I keyworded all my articles on him with his name, you shouldn’t have a hard time finding it. And you can go to my book store to the right Truthshop, and read the books on the history of science and Christianity, you are badly mistaken due to your lack of concern of the truth.

      (Also yeah the last post was a bit lengthy I don’t think I would have read the whole thing either but i wouldn’t say it is childish.

      What last post, yours? Wow so you think you are the only one who comments on what I write? Self-centered and arrogant much?

      You are the one who believes in the boogey man.)

      Because you said so and whatever you say is true. I’ve already pointed out you argue in ignorance, and you again made a mere claim. Read the article I posted on logical fallacies since you are illogical and remain stubborn and refuse to learn the truth. I finished with you because you are childish, and stooped low again with a childish low blow (if I said you were childish you must be since I carefully read the comments I get, unlike you) with the dumb boogey man comment, and the Bible says to avoid arguments of ignorance. If I haven’t told you already, glance at my homepage to this journal, look around it: how in the world, do you, a clearly lazy ignoramus, think you know and understand more than me on religion and atheism and how it relates to science?; You’re a massive idiot in comparison to me and make it very clear that you are, yet you are so arrogant, you refuse to see how obviously inflated you are. You don’t take pride in ignorance man, you take pride in knowing and understanding God, the source of truth and who is perfect, instead you take pride in your stupidity and feelings of feeling right! DUMB!

      You are wasting my time with your dumb, low blow, childish insults, and it is harassment when you do that. Again: The Bible says to avoid arguments of ignorance, and you are a massive ignorant. READ for once instead of being a skimmer and instant opionator. You’re opinions are worth less than a penny. The rest of your comments are ignored Mr. “I’ll Insult Him Again and Be So Arrogant as to Expect Him to Listen to Me Endlessly Regardless. You are arrogant and it ruins your ability to be logical. Now I will ignore you.

    • Chris S mitchell
      November 6, 2010 at 8:09 AM

      i think religious people are bitter because they can’t prove that the bible proves something like “their god is real” and is “the only true god” and all that fuss. most people really don’t give a $#!& or think it does anymore. because its very obvious there is simply NO PROOF. But scientists can prove anything they can measure and well, in the 21st cen. we can that “data” which is then used as evidence and often used to “prove” something.

      • November 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM

        “i think religious people are bitter because they can’t prove that the bible proves something like “their god is real””

        Emotard the Bible tells me to ignore arguments of ignorance, and you’re arguments are stupid child-babble which don’t prove anything but that you love swishing your emotion-based opinions around like a typical idiotic kid. Grow up and stop babbling and might wanna actually notice the evidence all throughout this journal let alone the entire Internet and the universe for God. Stop babbling and start reading more than pop mainsteam big bang and evolution babble and watching Discovery Channel cartoons. Hint Chris: “Proof” doesn’t mean “evidence”, which reminds me: use a dictionary and memorize the meanings of the words you use most often and when you argue, because you’re using the words wrong. Since you’re lazy, I’ll give you help: proof is evidence that personally convinces you, so when you say “such and such hasn’t been proved” you’re ignoring THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IT HAS BEEN PROVED TO. You’re so self-centered, as I said to you before, the utter, utter obvious is invisible to you. Pay attention to what is going on around you carefully, not with bias and the desire to just blurt out whatever seems to be true to you at the time. Have some patience and study.

        “and is “the only true god” and all that fuss.”

        Yeah, whatever.

        “most people really don’t give a $#!& or think it does anymore.”

        Because you said so Chris, and whatever Chris babbles is true is true because it came from Chris, whose feelings make him right. Yeah.

        “because its very obvious there is simply NO PROOF.”

        Obvious because Chris said, “simply” and “very obvious” and capitalized “no proof”. Gotta love Chris’ “science” and “evidence” and “proof”, not. Gotta love Chris’ clear vision of the obvious, which is so clear he misses the obvious that not everyone is a Christian and that many non traditional religions and non-religious life styles exist because Christians aren’t trying to control everyone and because God doesn’t do whatever he desires… <— (magic dramatic dots which make me right and Chris' magic dots wrong) oh but wait you just said, "most people really don’t give a $#!& or think it does anymore.“. Contradict yourself in your mindless “say-whatever-I-feel-at-the-moment” ranting?

        So most people don’t care about God anymore yet Christians control everyone, no wait they are trying to, uh, which is it insane babbler who cooool, “lols at ur world news hee hee hee, and my mockery makes ur journal silly cuz I mocked it heee hee”? Grow up snide, bitter infant.

        “But scientists can prove anything”

        Emotard scientists include Christians you insulting, stereotyping, truth-careless, ignoramus who is blind to the simply very obvious. See why the Bible says to ignore arguments of ignorance? What else endless stupid ignorant things you say should I reply to Chris, or should I ignore you now?

        “they can measure and well, in the 21st cen. we can that “data” which is then used as evidence and often used to “prove” something.”

        Chris, go to an English teacher and ask her to correct that grammatically nonsensical statement. And please don’t drink alcohol when you comment. And Chris, I don’t need you to tell me that evidence is used to prove things Mr. 1+1=2 You Should Know You Christians. And Mr. Well, Me Is Smart Chris and U R Dumb Christian Guy, would could analyze data before the 21st century, including Christians, and use that as evidence to prove something, just as we Christians do today, and just as non-Christians did i the past. Analyzing data and finding evidence in it to prove something and using it to prove something isn’t something knew, smug babbling moron. So Chris, in conclusion, stop being smug, arrogant, snide, and conniving, and babbling whatever you feel like babbling, and pay attention to the very simply obvious reality. Be humble and patient and listen to others instead of regurgitating baby-babble in your to no end and thinking the world wants to hear your silly talk after they are older than 17.

    • Addi
      October 10, 2011 at 10:46 PM

      I have to say that is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Not all Christians are good and not all atheists are bad. (The rest of this idiot’s rant has been deleted, for not bothering to read what he called “the dumbest” and rather coming here instead to opinionate as if his opinions were facts, “juz cuz.”)

      • October 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM

        “I have to say that is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Not all Christians are good and not all atheists are bad.” You’re probably one of the dumbest people alive because I never said all Christians were good: Did you notice, idiot, the right side of this page where TWICE ON TOP IT SAYS: THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CHRISTIANS AND WHY THEY MATTER. Further idiot, this is about Michio Kaku, not whether or not Christians or atheists are bad you five year old. Open your eyes and get a clue already mocking Opinionator. As for all atheists being bad: they are moron, they aren’t NOT all bad because you said so saying, “Oh this is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read.” You’re obviously a religion-ignorant and who knows nothing about Christianity or the BIble, and yet you go swinging your opinion at me as if the perspective of the other person, having no clue as to where it’s coming from, doesn’t matter. That’s all I read of what you said since it shows clearly you’re an ignorant arguing in ignorance. Learn what Christianity is about and the Bible, go to Sunday School 101-109 and learn what REFORMED Christians aka Calvinists believe or rather what God believes before babbling and playing judge over Christians. And fool: how is pointing out what Michio said dumb you time wasting idiot and when you and everyone else keeps coming here to find out? You are the idiot, not me. Stop lying and stop being fault-finding oaf. Learn right from wrong already (hint: it’s not based on your emo-liberal feelings). God bless you.

      • Jim Bart
        November 30, 2011 at 12:30 AM

        Btw, on the subject of Stephen Hawking concluding there is no God, Michio Kaku says he disagrees with Hawking and thinks concluding there is no God is to limit science itself. When Kaku says he needs proof, he’s saying this from a scientific principle and God says he can be “proved” and that we should question Him and he will be “proven”. I like how Kaku speaks to anyone who truly listens.

    • Jim Bart
      November 30, 2011 at 12:13 AM

      I’m interested in your reasoning and thought I would shed another perspective. I cannot offer you proof or enough of a perspective to change your mind (it would be extremely long), but perhaps I can suggest that you search things out with a different mind-set at the onset of your quest. i.e., research things by first assuming God was the big Electron and was actually a good Guy. You know, use the scientific principle of assuming something is true until actually proven otherwise.

      I, personally, have found two things to be true and in direct opposition to those who claim God is some type of Tyrant or even think He doesn’t exist. (My findings don’t make it true; it’s just my personal observation as a scientist. 1.) If you research the entire spectrum of Christianity and of Jesus Christ, Himself (rather than just one facet colored in a negative haze), with an open and scientific mind (by scientific I mean “questioning”), you will actually see that Christianity is not the depressing, hypocritical, self-righteous “religion” that those who oppose it, claim it is. It’s funny how (even some Christians) try to present the God of the Old Testament as some fire-breathing dragon who only smote the bad and praised the perfect. However, if you read the Bible through and read many, many historical texts, you can see that man sometimes puts a negative slant on God because of his own sinful nature. (i.e., Man can only see God through a human vantage-point and assumes “the Guy must be like me… it would piss me off if this person did this to me”.) But, God is really loving, compassionate and wants the best for EVERYONE. He’s not some hell-fire throwing god of vengeance. (We know this because we, as humans, have watched ourselves learn to have the same compassion and love and lack of vengeance as we seek God. I mean that the scientific principle of actually becoming Holy can actually happen because we see that it does as people practice God’s principles. Not that I’m saying we will ever attain holiness in this life, though I believe I have witnessed maybe a few that have.) The Guy has really gotten a bad rap based on a few misunderstood things. 2.) I and most scientists, I have found, actually believe in a God because without it, Math and Science just do not work. For most scientists or doctors, not to believe, requires “the willing suspension of disbelief” (as Hillary Clinton coined…not that I’m a Hillary fan, but I liked the phrase) and indeed, not only disbelief, but of completely ignoring scientific and physical principals by which we base all of our modern technology and engineering.

      I find it very cool that God proves himself to be the Creator of Science. I also find that Michio Kaku rises above the idle chatter and gossip of religion. (I also want the blog owner to take note of this part….just because I did not intend this to be a response to your post only and the owner’s question is about Kaku’s faith.) Christianity is not really a religion, but a way of life. Man in his quest for power has tried to turn it into a religion so he could use it for monetary and political gain (just as Christ said the Pharisees and Saducees did), but that’s the bad side of Man which does that. Thus, my conclusion is that Michio Kaku is not only a man of faith, but seems to be a Christian in the truest sense. God says that we would know other true Christians by the fruit that they bear (the scientific method of “proof” based on repeated observation) and I think Kaku bears pretty good fruit of the spirit – patience, kindness, gentleness, etc. He’s a very well-rounded dude… but that’s just my opinion. :)

      • November 30, 2011 at 12:34 AM

        I wonder how many mainstream scientists recognize the scientific method being used when Gideon tested to see if God was really talking to him.

  2. Chris S mitchell
    November 6, 2010 at 7:49 AM

    lol @ worldwide news..

    • November 6, 2010 at 12:30 PM

      lol @ Chris S mitchel whom I showed to be an infantile, babbling moron eager for what has already been all around him for thousands of years and which he participates in and yet still sees the scary All-Power Christian Group Boogie Monster That Controls Everything, Yet Magically Chis Has Escaped Enough To Babble Useless Comments and Stupid Insults.

      And moron, why are you laughing… <— oh look I made three dots, oooo the emotional drama must make me right in my insult against you then right Chris the emotard spaz? How is this journal not world news if it contains news throughout the world and the world goes to read it, or did you not notice the visitor map you idiot? And who comes to listen to you idiot? No one idiot. Fail.

  3. jjj
    November 27, 2010 at 8:17 PM

    Knight don’t get too worked up over atheist, most people can see past their hypocrisy.

  4. June 13, 2011 at 1:08 PM

    Well…Kaku was raised Buddhist by his parents. Although he did go to church as a child as well, I don’t really think he is Christian. I think that Kaku, if he must believe in a God, it must be the Universe, which is the beginning of our current time and space. A lot of scientists don’t hold to dogmatic religion, but they believe in their own forms of God that fit together with the science that they study. Many don’t believe in “God” as we are taught to define “him”. However, they could believe in “God” as in an immanent force, not an intelligent being, such as maybe the laws and forces of gravity, for example. Also, when people say “so and so percentage of scientists are religious” first off, where did you get those statistics? We must make sure that that has come from an actual survey or poll of authorized and credible scientists across the entire world. Sight sources. Secondly, if it is true, define “religous”. Oftentimes, people can believe in a certain kind of God or Gods WITHOUT being “religious”. We need to remember this. Also, are we talking Muslims, Hindus and Pagans, or Christians, Jews and Zaroastrinists? What kind of “religious” are we talking about? Usually people who talk about statistics like this are either Christian or Muslim. What would you say to a Pagan/Wiccan scientist? Would you include them in your statistics? If so, your argument doesn’t hold any water. Also, whether a scientist is “religious” or not should be the least of anyone’s concerns. Who cares. That doesn’t mean anything at all. I enjoy their discovers, whether they believe in a God, are religious, or not.


  5. Podunk Feezebottom
    September 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM

    These were great quotes, thanks for posting them.

  6. Microlesche
    December 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM

    lol. nice caps-locked comments. makes you look soo convincing.

    • December 4, 2011 at 1:54 AM

      And doting on caps locks in one comment to a sociopath like yourself makes you look so convincing? So my quotes of Michio are false because I justly emphasize what I say to a silly moron like yourself? And do you also lol and say nice caps to atheists and anti-Christians when they yell and say nonsensical things or boast arrogantly as proof of how right they are? Do those types of “caps” get your notice and mockery? No: because you’re an arbitrary, blind, hypocrite and a bigot.

      Stop being a fault-finding air head and learn something other than mocking for once you childish parrot.

  7. latter-days
    January 4, 2012 at 7:35 PM

    Why is it so hard to belive in a God, In the old testment times it took to witness to prove some one of a crime, or any thing else. I belive if we open are minds and look at the whole picture we can use the bible as who created the universe and then use science as how he created the universe. If we think like this we can understand the universe with more ease.

    • January 4, 2012 at 11:39 PM

      It’s hard to believe for various people because of their bitterness of not getting their way, because of being raised in ignorance, because of bias, because of temptation which can lead to delusion to justify giving in to that temptation, because of being raised to be believe they are good rather than than taught they are not good after a short while after having been born as the Bible says and because Satan causes them to forget and manipulates their minds and emotions. As for how God created the universe, there’s no evidence we can find out how God did that, and there’s no reason to try. We can’t even figure out how to get rid of scars yet.

  8. reidar
    January 25, 2012 at 12:46 PM

    You are incorrect, please stop saying intelligent people like michio kaku believe in a personal god.

    “Dr. Michio Kaku stated on his show “Time” that he does not believe in god. Einstein originally used the term “God” as a metaphor for the laws of physics. Physicists continue to use the metaphor as sort of a tip of the hat to Einstein.”

    • January 25, 2012 at 8:07 PM

      Turd brain atheist: you are incorrect because you did not bother to carefully read the article moron: no one said he believed in God idiot. Please learn to read with patience and to stop assuming you idiot. Perhaps you have narcissism disorder? You can read more about that mental illness here.

  9. Religious
    March 15, 2012 at 4:13 AM

    Human beings so far has explained very little about how the universe works even this explanation is far from complete and yet some people claim things they do not really have knowledge of including Stephen Hawking , Weinberg and others .Even If M theory ( Which we know nothing about and whose various limits describe an extremely amazing and unimaginable universe) is true . No one can claim that it describes the whole of creation. And most scientists working in the field do not agree with hawking.

    • March 15, 2012 at 6:08 AM

      “most scientists working in the field do not agree with hawking.” do you have evidence for this

    • Sean
      March 4, 2013 at 8:44 PM

      True, human being are far from explain the whole universe. But at least what science explained so far are testable and have consistent result. But why could a religious person claim things about the god or our universe, do they “really have knowledge of” the universe or the god? For god’s sake, why do people even insists on whether there is or isn’t a god?

      quote one of knight’s earlier reply:
      “As for how God created the universe, there’s no evidence we can find out how God did that, and there’s no reason to try. We can’t even figure out how to get rid of scars yet.”

      sure, there’s no evidence we can find out how God did that, there’s also no evidence we couldn’t. We have so little knowledge about the universe, and even lesser information about the god or even the existence of the god. why start claiming something we have so little knowledge of? wouldn’t it be more reasonable if we just work with what we have now, such as proved and applied science. And then making theory base on them, test and expand. Until we reach the point where we have include god into our knowledge, there’s no reason to concern our selves with something we don’t know nor should we make decisions based on god.

      And knight, if you are reading this, please define god for me.

      • Sean
        March 5, 2013 at 7:20 PM

        We can’t have a mature conversation if you just storm in and call everyone idiots(even some of those whose one your side).

        when i refer to “science”and “test”, i mean newton’s law, thermodynamic, engine, car, and the very computer you are using right now. But if you want to bring in evolution, fine.

        Evolution is just a theory, and are not complete. “you can’t TEST EVOLUTION” as a whole, but its fragment was TEST and had consistent result.put a bacteria of different species together, the fittest will win out over time. change the environment, the specie that adjust and fit most with the environment will grow more population then those that does not. with fragment like this and geography, chemistry we can find fragments of past environments. and then
        “making theory base on them, test and expand. ” and propose the evolution theory. It is not perfect, but there are testable evidence that supports it, with more evidence to be discovered, the theory can be constantly modified.

        But how can you test creationism? rely solely on bible? yeah, turn to page xxx, “there will be light”, turn to page xxy, “because god said so”

        “science isn’t simply “whatever” you believe it to be”
        you are talking about the absolute truth, and science is not absolute truth. like everything else, science do make mistake, and that’s why it is constantly changing, improving and fixing those mistake.

        but religion? the bible is always right, whatever the god say is right, whatever the people who “recorded” it on the bible never makes mistake and even those who translated the bible is absolutely right. all those people never make a single mistake, they all understand god even his metaphors perfectly, in every language bible is translated to. What are the odds of that? when bible makes a mistake, who fix it? will any Christian accepts the correction?

        and Science is EXACTLY whatever scientist believe it to be. Because Science is not truth, instead it is ideas that are trying to mod the truth. And science, the ideas, are defined by scientist. they could be wrong about the truth, but they could not be wrong about what idea they have. the difference between science and religion is, scientist believe in ideas because there are evidence to support it, because the idea is most likely to be true. but religion require your “faith”, require you to believe in ideas without asking for evidence and proof.

        scientist will ask the question
        what is faith? or god?
        But religion forbidden you to ask and think, because you are suppose to have “faith”, and to accept what they tell you.

      • March 5, 2013 at 6:27 PM

        “But at least what science explained so far are testable and have consistent result” no you gullible idiot science isn’t simply “whatever” you believe it to be or some evolutionist or Michio Kaku. YOU and evolutionists do not OWN scientists you idiot, and you can’t TEST EVOLUTION OR THE BIG BANG OR ABIOGENESIS. You’re an idiot, you are stupid and it’s obvious you are because you hate God and don’t give him the credit he deserves. Get lost.

  10. July 30, 2012 at 3:26 PM

    Sorry if I sound a bit rude.

    “Ignore arguments of ignorance” is one of your famous quotes, as seen in most of your comments here, dear author. However, I know how you feel when you think someone insults your religious beliefs, but talking in the context of the Christ I’m sure he did not yell or argued when some Jewish priests in Nazareth called him a heretic to their religion. Jesus was compassionate enough to take on insults and beatings without retaliating violently. He is verily the role model for all Christians, or anyone who admires him without having to be baptized.

    But I have to disagree with you when you say your commentators are bringing up ignorant arguments. Basically their beliefs are based on scientific findings; yours is based on the Gospel, so ultimately both of you are commenting from different worlds altogether. It’s like a world before Whites met any African and vice versa; the Whites would say that human beings in the whole world are Whites, and the Africans says that human beings in the whole world is black, and anyone caught having different claims are heretics. Then, suddenly a black man appeared in the White village, and a white man appeared in the African village: both villages got a shock of their lives! New discoveries changes perception and mentality, thus it is called science, or anything similar to it.

    Maybe you should try taking another approach in discussing science and religion, and having compassion is the ultimate way into hearing both sides. I would say that although your commentators are rude in attacking some sides of your personal beliefs, but that was because you were trying to convince everyone that Dr. Michio Kaku is a believer who hides behind Albert Einstein as if he would be persecuted if he tells everyone he is so. In my personal opinion however, Dr. Michio Kaku is more of an agnostic like all other scientist. He can’t just rely solely on faith to justify his beliefs, he needed science to prove so that he could have faith. He is basically just being neutral and unbiased, so that the viewers of his videos can have their own approaches on what they should believe. As a thinker he does not give absolute answers, he provokes the minds of others to seek out their own.

    Mahatma Gandhi once said: “I like your Christ, but I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ”. Not intended for mockery reasons, but if you’d think deeper you’ll get what Mr. Gandhi meant.

    • July 30, 2012 at 6:08 PM

      ““Ignore arguments of ignorance” is one of your famous quotes, as seen in most of your comments here” you quoted me wrong and it’s a quote from the Bible, I always say, “The Bible says” with that saying. So wow, right away you’ve messed up, and why?

      “I’m sure he did not yell or argued when some Jewish priests in Nazareth” Who said I was yelling? Third, WRONG. An ignorant comment because you assumed rather than read the Bible which is easy since you could have just used a search engine! That is why the Bible says to ignore arguments of ignorance. It’s a waste of time and starts more arguments and is a waste of energy. Study the Bible better than you study the Quran. My journal has many commentaries about the Bible.

  11. Garbonzo
    January 18, 2013 at 7:02 PM

    A worldwide flood could not have been possible for a number of reasons. Even if it did happen, it would wipe out all life on Earth. It didn’t happen.

    Most people who think logically think the flood was a local one, such as like in the movie Evan Almighty. [Ray originally made a break here] Therefore your flood theory is futile. A worldwide flood did not shape the grand canyon (or we would see more canyons like the grand canyon, as every river in existence at the time of the global flood would be a grand canyon according to you, even then it would take eons for all the water to disappear from the canyons, your hypothesis is nuts).

    [Crossed out by Knight for being a stupid rant].

    • January 19, 2013 at 12:45 AM

      Lol. I approved your comment because it shows how ignorant and stupid people like you are who don’t believe it. Look everyone how stupid this statement is:

      A worldwide flood could not have been possible for a number of reasons.” Now what’s Ray’s next response? Is it to give us an obvious not-debatable reason that completely makes the Flood story a clear impossibility as can be done with the Big magical life making Bomb from billions and billions of years ago or magical Darwinian evolution or the magic Frankenstein soup?, no, instead he then says:

      “Even if it did happen, it would wipe out all life on Earth.”

      So this person Ray is so stupid and ignorant that he doesn’t know

      1) basic biology, doesn’t have basic knowledge about SEEDS (WOW, seriously? A GUY WHO DOESN’T KNOW A THING ABOUT SEEDS IS ARGUING LIKE HE’S RATIONAL AND KNOWLEDGEABLE AND WORTH HEARING?!), or about sea plants or


      Then what’s Ray’s next statement, is it finally a piece of irrefutable evidence to back up his stupid arguments of ignorance which the Bible says to ignore (can you guess why it says to ignore such arguments?)? No, it’s:

      “It didn’t happen.”

      So, Ray is part of the Word of Faith movement! Name it and claim it! If you say it’s true or say, “Go away problem” it is instantly gone or with a few more repetitions it is. Or if you say, “It’s not true there’s a Satan who is blinding me and making me forgetful of obvious things, I can see clearly and I remember everything,” poof, Satan disappears and is gone and never existed and you’re perfectly logical.

      That’s a massive flood of stupidity of the kind that leads to mass murder as has been committed by atheist tyrants in these modern times. Praise God for the evidence that atheism leads to extreme stupidity, extreme poverty, extreme greed, extreme self-centeredness to the point of ignoring the obvious around you, misery, confusion, and death, all the opposite of “progress” and a hindrance to science that so many atheists claim to love and further.

      Ray, I didn’t read the rest of your rant, because God gave the good command to, “Ignore arguments of ignorance.” I’m not wasting anymore time on you and any comment you make that I think is from you will not be approved or unapproved.

  12. December 3, 2013 at 5:34 AM

    Michio Kaku is selling books. He, just like Neil deGrasse Tyson, is not willing to loose potential readers just by stating his disbelieve. The vast majority of scientist will not even discuss the subject of god, wich they consider irrelevant.

    • December 3, 2013 at 4:08 PM

      Oh yeah, forgot he wrote books. It seems though if he said he were an atheist he’d get more grant money and be more considered a solid reliable skeptic by the skeptics and mainstreamers who would then let him do more shows. But I think he has enough money in his mind, and just doesn’t want to deal with “spam” from Christians emailing him or walking up to him preaching why atheism is wrong etc. He’s either heard that is done to atheists, has seen it happen, or realizes it will if just says he doesn’t believe, so it might not be simple “pandering” to all sides for their approval like I first thought. But narcissists do love positive attention if they can get it, and he doesn’t seem like the type that wants negative attention, so I imagine his silence is for a kind of approval from Christians okay with being an agnostic and to at least not be ignored by the majority who may then think he’s a lost cause or just give him a few prayers and then a “goodbye”.

  13. Xeo
    January 15, 2014 at 3:06 PM

    knight :
    Turd brain atheist: you are incorrect because you did not bother to carefully read the article moron: no one said he believed in God idiot. Please learn to read with patience and to stop assuming you idiot. Perhaps you have narcissism disorder? You can read more about that mental illness here.

    That’s typical christian way to speak! And they tell us about love of Christ! Ha-ha! …”he believed in God idiot”… or idiot God?

    • January 17, 2014 at 10:09 AM

      “An unjust man is an abomination to the righteous; And he that is upright in The Way is an abomination to the wicked.” – Proverbs 29:27

      Bye mocker criminal who hates the righteous. All your ranting will never excuse your sins, all your, “But God, he stole from the cookie jar too, don’t send me to Hell, hate him and send him with me too” won’t save you angry hypocrite child.

      Get that log out of your eye like Jesus said Mr. Maybe This Maybe That HAHAHA. Disgusting.

      Maybe you’re a turd brain too.

  14. March 2, 2014 at 10:50 AM

    Faith is so simple that it eludes us all if we do not come to God like a Child. The complexity of creation itself and the odds against evolution are the proof that you look for. Bible Prophecy proves the Claims of the Creator THAT Creator is Jesus Christ! Explained in The Gospel of John. The Word made everything and The Word became flesh … i.e. Jesus, then the Bible proves that Jesus is God by the sheer overwhelming evidence of things that He accomplished, in such a short time span. Three Years!


    Bible Prophecy begins by asking Jesus Christ to open your eyes and to come and have a discussion with about creation.

    The whole theme of the bible is the Messiah and how He will come through Abram’s seed who we now call Israel.

    The Gospel of John was written in such a way so that even a child can understand it.

    In the beginning was the Word … the Word became a man … this man fulfilled all of the prophecies about himself to the letter. The Odds of Probability say He is God.

    I hope you find the Prince of Peace Mr. KaKu … The world is on its last legs … everyone can clearly see that science cannot change anything Men are not fit to Govern .. Without God things look pretty hopeless … Bill

    • March 2, 2014 at 2:36 PM

      It’s clear to those who’ve studied Michio, that he has NPD, it’s a permanent corrupt mental disorder that can’t be cured, he won’t be standing before God in Heaven, ever.

  1. April 3, 2010 at 3:02 PM
  2. April 3, 2010 at 3:04 PM
  3. May 1, 2012 at 4:55 AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 58 other followers

%d bloggers like this: