Archive for January, 2010

The Effect of the Flood of Illegal Immigrants from Mexico and South America on the U.S. Economy

January 31, 2010 Leave a comment

Besides racism, jealousy, and security, about twenty minutes ago it suddenly occurred to me why certain American conservatives and republicans might not want a flood of illegal immigration and to get rid of the ones already in America. When an illegal buys a product from some city in America, they have to pay taxes like everyone else,  and if any are driving through a toll road, they have to pay a toll, and that goes into the local or national treasury. Those taxes help fun food stamps, welfare, and disability and social security income. Familiar with the rantings of Shawn Hannity and Rush Limbaugh (whom many conservatives and republicans trust in), I noticed that they often ranted about how they had to work to survive and get to where they are, and how they don’t like their money being used to pay for illegals to live a nice life without having to work. I’d bet conservatives and republicans also don’t like not being able to lord it over anyone who isn’t working, which they feel they can’t do, if someone can simply say, “A large part of my income comes from the taxes of illegal immigrants” and therefore not from citizens, like Shawn and Rush. So then Shawn and Rush have less to boast about, their pride is wounded if someone can say that they didn’t have to work as hard, and in part survived off the taxes of illegals. Many would say, I’d bet, that Rush and Limbaugh are the leeches, babbling stupidity almost every day for almost three hours a day, and for distracting and misleading millions of Americans.

Update 6:12 P.M., N.M.:

Hmmm, I might be right:

The apparent jealousy over those receiving “free” money or help reminds me of  The Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard:

“For the kingdom of heaven is like a landowner who went out early in the morning to hire men to work in his vineyard. He agreed to pay them a denarius for the day and sent them into his vineyard. About the third hour he went out and saw others standing in the marketplace doing nothing. He told them, ‘You also go and work in my vineyard, and I will pay you whatever is right.’ So they went. He went out again about the sixth hour and the ninth hour and did the same thing. About the eleventh hour he went out and found still others standing around. He asked them, ‘Why have you been standing here all day long doing nothing? ‘Because no one has hired us,’ they answered.He said to them, ‘You also go and work in my vineyard.’ When evening came, the owner of the vineyard said to his foreman, ‘Call the workers and pay them their wages, beginning with the last ones hired and going on to the first.’ The workers who were hired about the eleventh hour came and each received a denarius. So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius. When they received it, they began to grumble against the landowner. ‘These men who were hired last worked only one hour,’ they said, ‘and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.’ But he answered one of them, ‘Friend, I am not being unfair to you. Didn’t you agree to work for a denarius? Take your pay and go. I want to give the man who was hired last the same as I gave you. Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?’ So the last will be first, and the first will be last.” – Matthew 20, the N.I.V. Bible

This verse also applies to illegal immigrants who are angry over citizens who get the same amount or more, of what they had to work hard for.

From the N.Y. Times, June 19, 2006

More than half of the estimated seven million immigrants toiling illegally in the United States get a regular paycheck every week or two, experts say. At the end of the year they receive a W-2 form. Come April 15, many file income tax returns using special ID numbers issued by the Internal Revenue Service so foreigners can pay taxes. Some even get a refund check in the mail.

And they are now present in low-skilled jobs across the country. Illegal immigrants account for 12 percent of workers in food preparation occupations, for instance, according to an analysis of census data by the Pew Hispanic Center. In total, they account for an estimated one in 20 workers in the United States.

The building maintenance industry — a highly competitive business where the company with the lowest labor costs tends to win the contract — has welcomed them with open arms. According to the Pew Hispanic Center, more than a quarter of a million illegal immigrants are janitors, 350,000 are maids and housekeepers and 300,000 are groundskeepers.

What Does Michio Kaku Believe and Can He Be Believed?

January 30, 2010 45 comments

Post link:

According to Michio Kaku, about 30% of scientists (polled since WWII) are religious and believe in God. He also believes that the Bible is scientific (Coast to Coast AM interview), good. Some quotes from him:

What was God thinking when the universe was created? That’s where we are going with this thing [the super collider]. … The universe… is quite beautiful… it could have been random… it could have been horrible… that’s what Einstein believed. 11:51-11:52 P.M., 1/29/2010, Coast to Coast A.M.. his reply to the host Art Bell

“God throws dice, what can I say?”- Michio Kaku, 12:41 P.M., 1/29/2010, Coast to Coast A.M.

When scientists use the word God, they usually mean the God of Order. For example, one of the most important revelations in Einstein’s early childhood took place when he read his first books on science. He immediately realized that most of what he had been taught about religion could not possibly be true. Throughout his career, however, he clung to the belief that a mysterious, divine Order existed in the universe. His life’s calling, he would say, was to ferret out his thoughts, to determine whether he had any choice in creating the universe. Einstein repeatedly referred to this God in his writings, fondly calling him “the Old Man.” When stumped with an intractable mathematical problem, he would often say, “God is subtle, but not malicious. – Hyperspace : A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the 10th Dimension, Page: 331

They [science and religion] can be in harmony, but only if rational people on both sides engage in honest debate. Einstein believed in two types of Gods, for example. He did not believe in a personal God, or a God of intervention. He did not believe that God answered our prayers. But he did believe that there was a God of Spinoza. This is the God of Harmony. He said we are like children entering a huge library for the first time, not knowing how to read the thousands of books that are beyond our understanding. Many scientists, therefore, might say that they believe in a God of harmony. For example, scientists believe in a Big Bang that started the universe. But then we have to ask what happened before the Big Bang (more on that later). Then we have to ask where the laws of physics came from. Personally, I think that the laws of physics are the only ones possible, that all other laws are mathematically inconsistent. Thus, God probably had no choice in creating the universe, as Einstein believed. – Kaku’s response in a chatroom to the user FifthDream, who asked him, “Dr. Kaku, what is your opinion on science and religion? Are the two in opposition or can there be harmony?”, 2003

To Michio: you’re always speaking behind Einstein when it comes to whether or not you believe in the God of the Bible or not, or a God who cares about his creation or ever intervenes or whether or not he predestined what will be. Please don’t do this, just say what you believe. Are you afraid of being wrong or ridiculed or discriminated against by the majority of so called “mainstream scientists”? People will ridicule you too, and probably have, for not speaking plainly. Though Jesus often spoke in riddles (and often only implied things) he gave explanations for much of what he said. And if he didn’t, other parts of the Bible usually explain, but where is the information to let us know what you believe about God? Talk about yourself for once, not Einstein, who’s Relativity Theory was wrong.

Update: 2/6/2011 10:20 AM:

Seeing that many people are still looking at this post since I posted it, I decided to watch an uploaded video on Youtube, a segment of a BBC documentary that a rude commenter had pointed out to me last year, but which out of resentment I ignored for a while. But I watched it a few minutes ago and transcribed the parts most relevant to this post:

Michio: “I imagine that eternal life was a powerful incentive for people who worshiped here (Well’s Cathedral). … The problem today though, is tIhat many of us is more skeptical. To get everlasting life in heaven, you have to trust that heaven actually exists. Speaking as a scientist, I think that there is a problem with regards to the afterlife and religious immortality, and that is there’s no proof that it exists. Remarkable claims require remarkable proof. But maybe, you don’t need proof. Well, I do.” – Micho Kaku, BBC Video: There Here After. ”

Later in the video, Michio tours the Grand Canyon with some old male geologist who claimed that “they” (who?) said that it took the stream (the one that usually goes through the Grand Canyon) “5 million years” to carve it out. Michio, after leaving him then said as a wide screen shot of the canyon was being shown, “Unimaginable eons of time are needed for water to carve out valleys.”

How in the world did he miss that the Bible says a worldwide disaster occurred which included it being completely flooded? Not only that, why didn’t he mention floods at all???????? Don’t floods also carve out things and make rapid changes? Doesn’t a constant downpour of rain erode certain hills and mountains and cliffs which have countless times caused devastating mudslides? What a big oversight. Then I found from a video to the side of that one, on Youtube, what after transcribing, was an interview from a beautiful woman named Dr. Kiki:

Dr. Kiki: “…those big questions, theoretical physicists seem to come up those, throughout their entire careers”

Michio: “That’s why I became a theoretical physicist. I wanted to bump up against those big questions.”

Dr. Kiki: “…constantly.”

Michio: “…and so, I mean that’s another question I was really interested in, is that.

Dr. Kiki: “I’ve heard that the majority of, theoretical physicists, are, incredibly spiritual, and, have, a great appreciation for, the concept of consciousness and the soul and the universe and where it came from because these are the questions which they’re constantly, asking. Um, for yourself, how do you, how do you, what’s your view on, life, and, you know, where is it, what are you doing when you teleport. life, if we ever get to that point.”

Michio: “Uh well if I knew the answer to, to life I would have inside track up there (he laughs while motioning with his hand with a thumbs up to Heaven). Uh but let me tell you how we, we, we physicists view things, right. For example, um, Einstein was asked the big question, ‘Is there a God is there a meaning to everything?’ right?”

Dr. Kiki: “Right.”

Michio: “And here’s how Einstein answered the question: He said there really are two kinds of God’s, we have to be very scientific, we have to dih- define what you mean by, ‘God’. If God is the God of intervention, the personal God, the God of prayer, the God that parts the waters, then he had a hard time believing in that, would God listen to all our prayers for, a bicycle for Christmas, and, smite the Philistines for me please (points in front of him as if pointing to them). He didn’t think so, however he believed in the God of order, harmony, beauty, simplicity and elegance; the God of Spinoza. That’s the God that he believed in, because he thought the universe was so gorgeous. It didn’t have to be that way, it could have been chaotic, it could have been ugly, messy. But here we have the fact that all the equations of physics, can be placed on a simple sheet of paper.”

Dr. Kiki: “Right.”

Michio: “Einsteins equation is only, one inch long (makes a inch length with his index finger and thumb of his right hand).”

Dr. Kiki: “Mmmm hmmm.”

Michio: “And the quantum theory is about a yard long(,) but you can squeeze it, on, to, uh, a sheet of paper (the intervew and Michio laugh).”

Dr. Kiki: “Right(,) with a small enough font.”

Michio: “Right. And with string theory you can even put those equations together. And string theory can be, squeezed into an equation one inch long (makes the inch length with his right hand again).”

Dr. Kiki: “Hmm. (with an upward tone).”

Michio: “And that equation by the way is my equation (laughs a little and widens his eyes), that’s string field(?) theory.

Dr. Kiki: “Nice.”

Michio: “That’s my contribution.”

Dr. Kiki: “Right.”

Michio: “But we wanna know, well where did that equation come from, you know? This is what Einstein asked, uh, ‘Did God have a choiccce. Was there any choice in building a universe.’ When he woke up in the morning he would say(,) he would say, ‘I’mwanna create a universe(,) I’m gonna be God today. What kind of universe would I create.'” Then Michio quickly said, “This is how he (Einstein) created much of his theories.”

Note: The interview was casual, Michio was confident, barely nervous-sounding if at all, didn’t have perhaps but a hint of boastfulness which at most was when he credited himself with the invention of string field theory, and it was fast-paced.

After typing this up I looked to see when this interview had been made, and at found this comment (which seems to confirm that Michio said “field” where I put the question mark):

Posted August 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM

Kaku, as usual, is being dishonest when he takes credit for contributing the equation for string field theory!

Light-cone string field theories were introduced by Stanley Mandelstam and developed by Mandelstam, Michael Green, John Schwarz and Lars Brink. An explicit description of the second-quantization of the light-cone string was given by Michio Kaku and Keiji Kikkawa. (From

I didn’t find out when the Kiki interview was made, but the interview on Youtube which I transcribed, above, was uploaded in April, 2009.

Here’s a video on Youtube in which Michio Kaku says that those who are opposed to the NWO are terrorists.

Related articles:

More on Michio Kaku’s Character Creationism and String Field Theory Controversy

Who Invented String Theory?

Mainstream Science: A Polluted Crowded Stream of Quacks and Cracked Pots

The Contradictory Anti-Christian Attacks of the Narcissist and Freemason, Mark Twain

January 30, 2010 5 comments

The Contradictory Anti-Christian Attacks of the Contradictory,
Narcissist and Freemason, Mark Twain

by Daniel Knight, 11:05 P.M.


The very expensive first floor library of the oh so impoverished sufferer and God-hater, Mark Twain.

Mark Twain, who was named Samuel Clemens by his parents, was born in Florida, Missouri on November, 30, 1835. He was taught Presbyterian doctrine when he was a child. About twenty six years later, on May 22, 1861, he became a Freemason at the Polar Star Lodge No. 79 A.F.&A.M., which was at that time, located in St. Louis. It was there that he obtained the degree (rank) of Fellow Craft on June 12 and later obtained the degree of Master Mason on July 10. He went from being a Presybterian, to a deist, to a doubter of God’s existence, to an atheist. He became morally and logically worse over time, just as the Bible says happens to those who forget his word. Here are various evil things which he said against God:

“If there is a God, he is a malign thug.”

“Our Bible reveals to us the character of our god with minute and remorseless exactness… It is perhaps the most damnatory biography that exists in print anywhere.”

“[The Bible] is a mass of fables and traditions, mere mythology.”

“It is by the fortune of God that, in this country, we have three benefits: freedom of speech, freedom of thought”

“If there is a God, he is a malign thug.”

“a God who… mouths Golden Rules and forgiveness multiplied seventy times seven”

“It ain’t the parts of the Bible that I can’t understand that bother me, it is the parts that I do understand.”

So God, whom Twain expressed overwhelmingly shows more mercy than hatred, expressed by you as “golden rules and forgiveness multiplied seventy times seven”, bothered him, yet he called God’s character that of  “a malign thug”.

“The Bible has noble poetry in it… and some good morals… and upwards of a thousand lies.”

Which is the Bible Mark Vain?: An exact description of a real God, or a book of more than a thousand lies? Who is God Mark Vain?: A malign thug or giver of good morals, freedom of speech, and freedom of thought, who makes life so incredible, that even a bitter life is prized by those who hate God as extremely as you? How can a malign thug have “some good morals“? And what were these “good morals“? Which is it?: “Love your neighbor as yourself” or was it “Do unto others as you would have them do to you” which even some of the most  Christian-hating atheists claim are “golden rules“, or “Forgive your enemies”, or “love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back.”, or “Don’t pervert justice; don’t show partiality to the poor or favoritism to the great, but judge your neighbor fairly.” or “If one of your countrymen becomes poor and is unable to support himself among you, help him as you would an alien or a temporary resident, so he can continue to live among you.” or “Religion that God considers pure and acceptable is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.”? Oh wait, I know: “Don’t lie”, “Don’t steal”, “Don’t murder”? Which ones of these are the “good morals” that you called “golden rules”? Why didn’t you point them out specifically like you did the opinions of your heart you hypocrite troll?

Mark Twain deluded himself into thinking that he was wiser than God, and in so doing became confused, so that he contradicted himself when he spoke against God. Mark Vain was also a hypocrite who new better than to rant against God:

“In religion and politics, peoples’ beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination.”

“A psalm of David: ‘Jehovah, who may dwell in your sanctuary? Who may live on your holy hill?: He whose walk is blameless and who does what is righteous, who speaks the truth from his heart and has no slander on his tongue, who does his neighbor no wrong and casts no slur on his fellowman, who despises a vile man but honors those who fear Jehovah, who keeps his oath even when it hurts, who lends his money without usury and does not accept a bribe against the innocent. He who does these things will never be shaken.'” – Psalm 15:1-5

“‘For the director of music. Of David: ‘Those who are morally lacking say in their hearts, “There is no God.”; they are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good. Jehovah looks down from heaven on the sons of men to see if there are any who understand, any who seek God. All have turned aside, they have together become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one. Won’t those who do evil ever learn, those ones who devour my people as men eat bread and who don’t call on Jehovah? There they are, overwhelmed with dread: for God is present in the company of the righteous. You evildoers frustrate the plans of the poor, but Jehovah is their refuge. Oh, that salvation for Israel would come out of Zion! When Jehovah restores the fortunes of his people, let Jacob rejoice and Israel be glad! – Psalm 14

Mark Vain should have “examined” his own accusations, should have taken the log out of his own eye before pointing at the splinters he thought he saw in the eyes of those he hated and those he thought he was superior to.

“Our Bible reveals to us the character of our God with minute and remorseless exactness… It makes Nero an angel of light and leading by contrast.”

So why didn’t you fear God enough to keep your false ravings to yourself?

“It is by the fortune of God that, in this country, we have three benefits: freedom of speech, freedom of thought, and the wisdom never to use either.”

“Strange… a God who could make good children… who made them prize their bitter life, yet stingily cut it short”

Oh but God, your highness Mark Vain, are you saying you didn’t have the wisdom to think freely or speak freely? Or are you saying that this “malign thug” infinitely worse than Nero – a man whom you admit was evil for massacring and torturing Christians using lies as an excuse to do so – made you the exception? If you are the exception why are your sayings everywhere? How is it over 60 million Christians and believers in a God of “Do unto others as you would have them do to you” have advanced science far more than atheists, if God hasn’t given them good wisdom? How is it Christians have lived and survived for thousands of years if their God does not share his wisdom with them, and is not merciful? How is it you have been allowed to repeatedly blaspheme him in comfort into your old age, if he is without patience, love or mercy? And if life is “so bitter” why did you complain about God mercifully cutting it short you ingrate? Why don’t you point out what life is like for those who die with God’s forgiveness you fault-finder? And if Christians are mere robots, things without a free will, why did you condemn them as being responsible for evil? Stupid criminal!

“Strange… a God who… mouths Golden Rules and forgiveness multiplied seventy times seven and [yet] invented Hell”

Poor you, poor criminal: God made an eternal prison for an eternally hateful misleader who used his “free will” and mouth to blaspheme against good instead of to do good.

And, “Of the delights of this world, man cares most for sexual intercourse, yet he has left it out of his heaven”

So Mark Vain: God should have encourage man to become Christians so that they could get their 70 virgins or young beautiful servant boys? Why didn’t you become a Muslim you hypocritical pervert? And you thought that if God doesn’t mention something, IT DOESN’T EXIST? TYPICAL TWISTED ATHEIST LOGIC! And you think God can’t come up with something better than mere sex? Why did you limit God’s wisdom to a stupid man like yourself seeing that he made the universe and all that is in it, including sex, except sin? Stupid babbler.

“Man is a marvelous curiosity. When he is at his very very best he is a sort of low grade nickel-plated angel; at his worst he is unspeakable, unimaginable; and first and last and all the time he is a sarcasm. Yet he blandly and in all sincerity calls himself the ‘noblest work of God.'”

I thought the Bible was false to call man’s heart so “desperately extremely evil” that it’s evil “cannot be known” by man? I thought it was false to repeatedly teach that Israel’s best deeds were like “filthy rags”? I thought the Bible was false to say that not a single person on Earth ever born was born good and that nearly no good man ever existed on Earth? I thought that Jesus was evil to say that non-Jews were dogs (as many Muslims, and no doubt atheists, believe was evil to say)? Which is it you dead fault-finder who damns God if he does and damns God if he doesn’t? Which is it you jealous corpse? And why do you complain about Hell if you say that man’s worst (wide spread, constant) evil is “unspeakable” and “unimaginable“? And how is it unimaginable if you know to point it out you babbler? You sure loved to babble the confused wicked thoughts of your heart didn’t you! Your babble was jealous of God’s words.

“Faith is believing what you know ain’t so”

No, “faith” means, “Belief in what is unseen (as in NOT SEEN, in other words what you can’t see)”, not “for which you can’t touch, feel, hear, smell or taste” or “for which there is no evidence”. There are so many stupid ignorants thanks to ones like Twain, and because of Satan, that many people think that “blind faith” is one word, or that faith itself means, “blind belief” which they imply “ignorantly believing in something for which there is no evidence”. Examples of this stupid ignorance are from a long-time atheist stalker in the comments section of this article, and one from a Buddhist here, who ironically is claiming while saying “blind faith”, that Buddhism is based on evidence (and yet he doesn’t even understand the difference between faith and evidence): “Buddhism does not demand blind faith from its adherents. Here mere belief is dethroned and is substituted by confidence based on knowledge“. Notice how his understanding is so poor that he uses knowledge in place of evidence, which is not a correct substitute, since a person can have incorrect knowledge which is not evidence. Google has recorded over 1,360,000 instances of the phrase “blind faith” on the Internet, showing wide spread confusion over the word “faith”.

“If Christ were here now there is one thing he would not be – a Christian”

Christian means, “Christ-follower” or “Follower of Christ”. So that statement makes no sense. Though Mark obviously meant, “He wouldn’t act like a Christian”, the statement is still nonsensical, and it stupidly stereotypes all Christians as being the same, even kids who are Christian. In 1910 there were millions of Christians, and many types, so how could Twain have known all the different types enough to pronounce such a judgment, and when according to his biographies, he didn’t spend his time studying Christianity, but only a little of it? He made no comments on the many doctrines of the many types of Christians, showing his ignorance of the subject. Twain was childishly bitter.

“if our Maker is all-powerful for good or evil, He is not in His right mind”

And what was the evidence that Twain base this judgment on?

“At other times, he [Twain] conjectured sardonically that perhaps God had created the world with all its tortures for some purpose of His own, but was otherwise indifferent to humanity, which was too petty and insignificant to deserve His attention anyway.” (Wikipedia/What is man?: and other philosophical writings).

Why would he “conjecture” this if Christ perfectly obeyed God while being persecuted by most of the world for loving God perfectly, and when he suffered an eternity of extreme physical and emotional pain for millions of people compressed into three days, and who still has not broken any of his promises to save mankind, or to have them do great good deeds by helping the needy and saving lives (and they are always doing so)? It was because he hated God, and so denied the truth.

Mark Vain was yet another blind, hypocritical, fault-finding, extremely bitter atheist whose mouth poured out hateful lies in his resentment of God’s justice and proud display of goodness, but one who lead astray millions, and gave birth to millions of mockers. Therefore mocker’s punishment will be severe, when he meets the God he knew was infinitely more dreadful and hateful than Nero.

How revealing of the evil of humanistic atheism that this atheist here doesn’t mention the clearly “good morals” and “golden rules” that his atheist babbling, mocker, hypocrite hero Mark Twain spoke of, but would not preach or put into practice, but only his dead hero’s twaining against God and everyone else’s evil! Truly atheists are “negative”!

Mark Twain will be condemned and then forgotten by the children of Wisdom, but forever remembered by the children of Hell. Mark Twain is dead and his foul words will burn in Hell with him.

The ingrate Mark Twain, enjoying the incredible technology that God allowed Tesla, an anti-social narcissist, to create.

Edison and Blavatsky’s Reasoning Against Darwinism and the Influence of Buddhism and Hinduism On Them

January 30, 2010 3 comments

Blavatsky’s Reasoning Against Darwinism, Darwin’s “Theory of Evolution”:

Suppose an Occultist were to claim that the first grand organ of a cathedral had come originally into being in the following manner. First, there was a progressive and gradual elaboration in Space of an organizable material, which resulted in the production of a state of matter named organic PROTEIN. Then, under the influence of incident forces, those states having been thrown into a phase of unstable equilibrium, they slowly and majestically evolved into and resulted in new combinations of carved and polished wood, of brass pins and staples, of leather and ivory, wind-pipes and bellows. After which, having adapted all its parts into one harmonious and symmetrical machine, the organ suddenly pealed forth Mozart’s Requiem. This was followed by a Sonata of Beethoven, etc., ad infinitum; its keys playing of themselves and the wind blowing into the pipes by its own inherent force and fancy. … What would Science say to such a theory? – SD ii 348

But there are certainly “designers,” though these are neither omnipotent nor omniscient in the absolute sense of the term. They are simply Builders, or Masons, working under the impulse given them by the ever-to-be-unknown, (on our plane) Master Mason — the ONE LIFE and Law. Belonging to this sphere, they have no hand in, or possibility of working on any other, during the present Manvantara, at any rate. That they work in cycles and on a strictly geometrical and mathematical scale of progression, is what the extinct animal species amply demonstrate; that they act by design in the details of minor lives (of side animal issues, etc.) is what natural history has sufficient evidence for.

In the creation of new species, departing sometimes very widely from the Parent stock, as in the great variety of the genus Felis—like the lynx, the tiger, the cat, etc.—it is the “designers” who direct the new evolution by adding to, or depriving the species of certain appendages, either needed or becoming useless in the new environments. Thus, when we say that Nature provides for every animal and plant, whether large or small, we speak correctly.

“I do not believe that any type of religion should ever be introduced into the public schools of the United States.” – Thomas Edison

“I have never seen the slightest scientific proof of the religious theories of heaven and hell, of future life for individuals, or of a personal God. [And whatever I can’t see” cannot exist.]” – Thomas Edison

“So far as religion of the day is concerned, it is a damned fake… Religion is all bunk.” – Thomas Edison

“To those searching for truth – not the truth of dogma and darkness but the truth brought by reason, search, examination, and inquiry, discipline is required. For faith, as well intentioned as it may be, must be built on facts, not fiction – faith in fiction is a damnable false hope.” – Thomas Edison

Below are selected quotes (with my comments between brackets, except one which is “[]” showing that I deleted a useless literary device) from the book Edison[:] Inventing the Century, by Neil Baldwin:

Mme. Blavatsky sent Edison a gift copy of Isis Unveiled along with application forms for membership in the Theosophical Society, which included among its diverse American adherents, Doubleday and William James. Edison immediately signed the papers, returning them to Mme. Blavatsky’s colleague Colonel Henry Steel Olcott, cofounder of the [Theosophical] Society… Edison’s cordial note read, “Please say to Madame Blavatsky that I have recovered her curious work and I thank her for the same. I SHALL READ BETWEEN THE LINES!” (A decade later however, perhaps in reaction to a report published in England by the Society for Physcical Research asserting that Mme. Blavatsky was a fraud, Edison vehemently denied articles in the press” the article’s appearing in the press quoting Colonel Olcott as stating that the famous inventor [Edison] was a card-carrying dues-paying Theosophist. Edison insisted that Olcott was mistaken even after the Colonel wrote to Edison [saying] that the signed membership form as well as a second letter from Edison acknowledging receipt of the Diploma of Fellowship were [both] enshrined in the Society’s international headquarters in Madras, India.)
Toward mid December 1878, four days before leaving America permanently for India, Mme. Blavatsky, who had become a naturalized citizen because, she said, “America is the only land of true freedom in the whole world,” and Colonel Olcott arranged a trip to Menlo park, as two members of the still ongoing celebrity parade to New Jersey. [Note, that previous paragraph seems to be grammatically wrong, perhaps because it says “and” when it shouldn’t. The author also should have said, “decided to become a naturalized citizen”]. When Mme. Blavatsky fell ill with discomfort from an emergency tooth extraction, and much to her chagrin was unable to make the journey, the Colonel went alone. He approached Edison not only as a fellow Theosophist, but also as honorary secretary to a Citizen’s National Committee created to act as a liason with the French government for the purpose of planning a major international industrial exposition in Paris for the coming year. Olcott hoped that the inventor would want to participate, which he most assuredly did. [“most assuredly did”? Pretentious.]
Having accomplished their business, the two men strayed off naturally enough into a conversation about “occult forces,” a field in which Edison had already done some exploring. Edison regaled (and intrigued) Olcott by telling him that he had attempted through the dynamism of will power (conducted via rubber tubes extending from his forehead) to move a pendulum suspended on the wall of his laboratory. Olcott narrowed the discussion of mental energy in general into the directly psychological realm…
Over the years up to and even beyond the flap over Edison’s affiliation with the Theosophical movement, Mme. Blavatsky, who was extremely prolific–her Collected Works take up more than ten thousand pages in fourteen volumes–published several articles discussing in partisan terms her ideas about his work; even though they never actually met, she was a deep admirer with a clear sense of the affinities between what Edison was after and what Theosophy valued: “Had our Brother Theosophist, Thomas Alva Edison, the inventor of the telephone and the phonograph, lived in the days of Galileo,” she wrote in her essay, “Magic” [yeah magic is just such a big contribution to science, hypocrite pagan], published in the Dekkan Star, Poona, India, in March 1879, “he would have surely expiated at the stake his sin of having found the means to fix on a soft surface of metal, and preserve for long years the sounds of the human voice; for his talent would have been pronounced the gift of Hell [oh yeah and don’t you know the pagans never did anything wrong and were such great scientists who peacefully gave us science, NOT. And what a cheap shot idiot: perpetuating the myth that Galileo was physically tortured and killed, when the truth is that he was given a luxury confinement. At least she didn’t say “The Church” or “Christians would have burned you alive.” Interesting also that she failed to mention that atheists had persuaded certain Catholics to persecute Galileo.] . . . Divine Wisdom has been discovered by Mr. Edison . . . in eternity of sound.”
In a March 1890 essay, “The Cycle Moveth,” [nope no pretention there, not] she approvingly cited Edison’s Monadic conception of matter, his intimation that there was a supreme unity manifesting itself within all particulate life, as expressed during an interview with G. Parsons Lathrop in a recent issue of Harper’s: “I do not believe that matter is inert, acted upon by an outside force. To me [] it seems that every atom is possessed by a certain amount of primitive intelligence; look at the thousand ways in which atoms of hydrogen combine with those other elements. . . . Do you mean to say they do this without intelligence?”
One month later, incensed to discover that “Brother Edison” was ridiculed and demeaned in the Review of Reviews as a “dreamer” for these Harper’s remarks, Mme. Blavatsky leaped to his defense yet again as a holistic think, a man with the spiritual wherewithal to accept the feasibility of a universal reality. [I can see from that nonsense statement where some of the New Age nonsense teachings came from.] In a provocative, indignant piece called “Kosmic Mind,” she took Edison’s side: “Would to goodness the men of science exercised their ‘scientific imagination’ a little more and their dogmatic and cold negations a little less. Dreams differ,” she wrote. [‘Whatever’ plagiarizing pagan. But you were right about (mainstream) scientists, the neo-skeptics, being dogmatic and (spiritually) short-sighted.] – pages 94-95

There was an old story that, on the day of his wedding to Mary Stilwell, the preoccupied Edison had to be roused from an experiment to get to the proverbial church on time. True or not, here was a man who, although he did give in to the tropical tranquility and sleep later than his accustomed dawn-breaking hour, needed to be close to his work. [And the author knows this how? And could you get any more pretentious with the pointlessly fancy wording?] The intellectual nature of that labor does seem to have been shaped by the major changes to his emotional life; it had returned, for a while at least, to a more spiritual plane, the kind of thinking that had been so seductive to Mme. Blavatsky and her followers. Ever since Mary’s death, Edison had spoken on occasion publicly of metaphysical concerns, his belief that within every atom, every subdivision of nature, there could be found “a certain amount of primitive intelligence . . . Look at the thousand ways in which atoms of hydrogen combine with those of other elements, forming the most diverse substances. Do you mean to say that they make animals of the lower orders. Finally they combine in a man, who represents the total intelligence of all the atoms.”
“But where does this intelligence come from originally?” he was asked.
“From some greater power than ourselves,” was the reply.
“Do you then believe in an intelligent Creator, a personal God?”
“Certainly,” said Mr. Edison. “The existence of such a God, in my mind, can almost be proved by chemistry.”
“This of it! A man in this skeptical century who dares believe in a discovery beyond all discoveries,” Edison’s shamelessly editorializing visitor concluded. “Here is a student of nature who is not afraid to have the spirit of a Galileo or a Kepler or an Isaac Newton . . . And so we discover down on Avenue B, in the prosaic city of New York, a philosopher who believes in a personal God.”
In the wonderful opening scene of the 1940 MGM classic, Edison, the Man, Spencer Tracy, playing the elderly but mellowed curmudgeon to fairytale perfection, is surrounded by a group of adoring children, smiling benignly upon them as the innocent questions come thick and fast, until with ultimate humility he smiles and points heavenward, saying, “That’s the real Inventor!” This was a statement from life, not a life concocted by the scriptwriter. – page 172

So, Edison was a creationist, he believed in intelligent design, but he rejected the designer’s master plan of salvation.


Apparently Tesla undertook a self-imposed vow of chastity, having been influenced in part by Swami Vivekananda, who preached chastity as the path to self-transformation and enlightenment.
Tesla met the Swami on February 13, 1896, at a dinner with Sarah Bernhardt after one of her performances in the play Iziel. As with the rest of the world, Tesla had first heard of the Swami during the summer of 1893 when the “Hindoo” gained overnight prominence after speaking at the Congress of World Religions, which had been held at the Chicago World’s Fair. As Tesla had been in Chicago within a month of the talk, it is conceivable that he met or saw the Swami speak at that time.
Vivekananda told “the great electrician” about “Vendantic Prana [life force] and Akasa [ether], which according to [Tesla], are the only theories modern science can etertain.”
Having studied Madam Blavatsky’s theosophical teachings, Tesla was already versed in the idea of Akasa and the Akashic Records, which are, in essence, the records of all historical events existing in some vibratory state in this ether.
“The Brahma, or Universal Mind,” the Swami continued, “produces Akasa and Prana.”
Tesla agreed with the essential premise of this Buddhist view, replying that the theory could be “proved mathematically by demonstrating that force and matter are reducible to potential energy,” and then the inventor invited Swami Vivekananda, some of his devotees, and Sarah Bernhardt to his laboratory for the following week to demonstrate through experiments this principle.
After Tesla showed the swami some of his “creations,” the swami advised that pure creation, in the sense that “something” was born from “nothing” was not possible. To Swami Vivekananda, creation was a process of combining existing elements into a new synthesis. This idea of the eternal nature of existence with no beginning and no ending was appealing to Tesla, and he later referred to this and related concepts in some of his writings. – Wizard: the life and times of Nikola Tesla, biography of a genius, pages 164-165, by Marc J. Seifer

all the great religions contain wise prescriptions relating to the conduct of life, which hold good now as they did when they were promulgated.

There is no conflict between the ideal of religion and the ideal of science, but science is opposed to theological dogmas because science is founded on fact. To me, the universe is simply a great machine which never came into being and never will end. The human being is no exception to the natural order. Man, like the universe, is a machine. Nothing enters our minds or determines our actions which is not directly or indirectly a response to stimuli beating upon our sense organs from without. Owing to the similarity of our construction and the sameness of our environment, we respond in like manner to similar stimuli, and from the concordance of our reactions, understanding is barn. In the course of ages, mechanisms of infinite complexity are developed, but what we call “soul ” or “spirit,” is nothing more than the sum of the functionings of the body. When this functioning ceases, the “soul” or the “spirit” ceases likewise.

I expressed these ideas long before the behaviorists, led by Pavlov in Russia and by Watson in the United States, proclaimed their new psychology. This apparently mechanistic conception is not antagonistic to an ethical conception of life. The acceptance by mankind at large of these tenets will not destroy religious ideals. Today Buddhism and Christianity are the greatest religions both in number of disciples and in importance. I believe that the essence of both [is what] will be the religion of the human race in the twenty-first century.

The year 2100 will see eugenics universally established. In past ages, the law governing the survival of the fittest roughly weeded out the less desirable strains. Then man’s new sense of pity began to interfere with the ruthless workings of nature. As a result, we continue to keep alive and to breed the unfit. The only method compatible with our notions of civilization and the race is to prevent the breeding of the unfit by sterilization and the deliberate guidance of the mating instinct, Several European countries and a number of states of the American Union sterilize the criminal and the insane. This is not sufficient. The trend of opinion among eugenists is that we must make marriage more difficult. Certainly no one who is not a desirable parent should be permitted to produce progeny. A century from now it will no more occur to a normal person to mate with a person eugenically unfit than to marry a habitual criminal.

Hygiene, physical culture will be recognized branches of education and government. The Secretary of Hygiene or Physical Culture will he far more important in the cabinet of the President of the United States who holds office in the year 2035 than the Secretary of War. The pollution of our beaches such as exists today around New York City will seem as unthinkable to our children and grandchildren as life without plumbing seems to us. Our water supply will he far more carefully supervised, and only a lunatic will drink unsterilized water.

More people die or grow sick from polluted water than from coffee, tea, tobacco, and other stimulants. I myself eschew all stimulants. I also practically abstain from meat. I am convinced that within a century coffee, tea, and tobacco will be no longer in vogue. Alcohol, however, will still be used. It is not a stimulant but a veritable elixir of life.” – Liberty, February, 1937, by Nikola Tesla, as told to George Sylvester Viereck

God would have made Tesla’s life one of constant joy and success if Tesla’s mind had rejected the mental Darwin virus and the myth that Christianity was a myth and asked God for forgiveness and accepted the way he commanded us to live. The same for Edison who oppressed and betrayed Tesla greatly.

It’s interesting to see that neo-pagans like Blavatsky and Edison could still see the error of Darwinism clearly, and that Tesla seemed to avoid endorsing evolution, that the New Age movement didn’t embrace Darwinism, but that eventually, thanks to atheists and the desire of neo-pagans to hold high-paying positions and to repel Christians, because Intelligent Design was one of the first and basic teachings of the Bible, which it stated clearly and specifically and that God creating the universe and all the life in it is used as a reason by the Bible and many Christians (especially Calvinists, of whom there are millions) to revere and obey God.

Related Articles:

More information on Madame Blasphemy:

Scientific Errors in Hinduism (it’s misleading to say “Scientific Errors” as if only a select few people were scientists (everyone is a scientists because we all learn using a scientific method that God naturally programmed into us all, some just ignore that instinct it at times and choose folly).
Contradiction in Buddhist Argumentation:
Karma Contradiction in Buddhism: (even an atheist can see a contradiction in Buddhism)

The Case for Global Government, from the Likely Perspective American Elitists

January 29, 2010 Leave a comment

Two days ago, at about 4 A.M., I thought of what advantage it would be to American Elitists, and the liberals of America, for America to lose it’s status as a country, and to merely become a province in a global world government, along with China also becoming a province. I wondered, because to turn America over to such a government would result in many in Congress possibly, and perhaps likely, losing their high ruling position. I thought that they, not wanting to go down in history as villains: They know that at least half of America blames them for making Americans the virtual slaves of China by often borrowing large amounts of money from China and usually not paying China back. The part of Congress not wanting to go down in history as evil, I think, is hoping that America’s debt will be voided, nullified, forgiven, if they become a province of a world government, including China, or even as part of China. And perhaps American liberals and their foreign family members and friends think this will happen too, and don’t want to look evil due to the leaders they voted in causing America to become a virtual slave to militant, oppressive, pollute-as-it-grows China. I don’t think that this will happen even if it comes true, because, I suspect, the non-Christian Han Chinese, many of them, believe that they are superior to other races, including other Chinese-races, and will want their money back, and take as much of America’s resources and money as they think is good (perhaps even taking American slaves, and their organs – I believe they will most likely make slaves of convicts and take their organs, being that prisoners are already legally used as slaves in America and because America’s prisons are overcrowded), and even when the Han think they have been paid back, will want to keep their advantage and continue to oppress America). Further, there is an estimated amount of 300 million poverty stricken citizens of China, and to prevent that number from further growing, and civil war, and wanting to be seen as wise and good, what remains of the Chinese government will push for those above them, if anyone, to take from America to at least quiet the anger of the poverty stricken among them, and the many well-off Chinese citizen’s who are friends or relatives of the poor ones who will most likely find forgiving America’s debt wrong. Threat’s to use their nuclear missiles, or hidden nuclear bombs, directly or via fake Chinese dissenters, might be used by the remaining Chinese government to scare whoever is over them, if anyone, into giving in to their demands. I have no doubt that whoever the world leaders or world leader is, will happily drain America’s resources, money and strength of America’s young and old, female and male, in their hatred of fundamentalist Christianity, hoping to rid America of it, in their hatred for truth. Do you think I am right? If not or if so, why or why not?

Shawn Hannity and Governor Rick Perry: Trojan Traitors

January 28, 2010 1 comment

Two days ago, on the Shawn Hannity Show, against a commercial break, a Shawn accepted a call from a female caller, and she told Shawn that there was someone more conservative than Gov. Rick Perry running to be the governor of Texas. Shawn asked her who that was, and she said “Debra Medina“. And she told Shawn that she was better because Perry was not showing that he was against the Trans-Texas Corridor which she told Shawn was a scheme to take away people’s property. Shawn replied, “Look, this idea that we can split votes between conservatives… this is an issue I will bring up in the days to come.” And then the show went to commercial. No surprise to me he said nothing about it yesterday, and probably nothing about it today. May God cause you to confess your pride, greed and hatred of truth and cause you to repent.

More about Gov. Rick Perry:

Youth rape scandal.

Perry Orders That Sixth Grader’s to Be Vaccinated Against Sexually Transmitted Disease.

Rick Perry’s Ties With Merck Run Deep

(Note: I thought I had published this yesterday.)

Massive Amount of New Powerful Scientific Evidence of Souls, Life After Death, Angels, and for the Son of God

January 26, 2010 5 comments

On the Jan. 25, 2010 edition of Coast to Coast A.M., the founder of the Near Death Experience Research Foundation, Dr. Jeffrey Long, discussed the results of his scientific research on near death experiences (NDEs) in which he accumulated the largest or one of the largest amounts of evidence supporting the existence of God, the human soul and it’s continued existence after the near death or temporary death of humans. The host was George Noory. Yet more evidence that shows that philosophies and religions contrary to a single all-powerful, loving, ultra-intelligent God are wrong.

Dr. Long with a partner wrote a book documenting his research titled Evidence of the Afterlife: The Science of Near-Death Experiences.

Deadly Doctors: Psychiatrists are Liars and Crackpots! Decades Long Lies by Atheists and Arminians Scams Trillions of Dollars

January 24, 2010 1 comment

Like I’ve been virtually saying for years: psychiatrists are quacks.

Ian Punnet, a Christian, though one on his way to Hell, rescued Coast to Coast A.M. yesterday night from George Noory’s string of dismal shows. Ian had Prof. Irving Kirsch on as a guest that night. Prof. Kirsch was on to talk about his book, “The Emperor’s New Drugs: Exploding the Myth of Antidepressants“, in which he exposed Darwinists, Arminians and atheists as being gullible or deliberate liars, who lied to the world about SSRI’s (like Prozac, Zoloft, and Ritalin) as being more beneficial to the “clinically depressed” then a placebo. Though Prof. Kirsch didn’t point out directly that it was Darwinists or atheists doing the lying and peddling, performing this massive decades long scam on the world they are the ones who makes up the majority of “mainstream” psychiatrists of the world according to Wikipedia (it’s also plausible statistically since Arminian-type Christians are the majority of Christians in the world, though they may not refer to themselves as Arminian).

So now, Darwinists have been found guilty of scamming the world yet again with their “depression is a result of a chemical imbalance” lie, adding to the rest of their ongoing scams, including the macro-evolution scam (which includes the super old universe scam, Big Bomb scam, Magic Soup Puddle of Life (as seen on Star Trek the Next Generation with atheist Q and atheist Captain Picard!) scam, “Neanderthals are a less intelligent separate species” lie, missing-link fossils scams, junk DNA scam, “dinosaurs were killed off by asteroids” scam, birds used to be dinosaurs scam, all dinosaurs are extinct scam, radiometric dating scams, and the eugenics scam), the Freudian psychology scam, the Pearl Harbor scam, the 9/11 scam, “we’re making the ozone holes bigger” scam, the Global Warming scam, “we’re causing mass extinctions” scams, the DDT scam, and endless nearly countless “life-saving medicine” scams (including toxic vaccine’s, anti-cancer and anti-AID’s drugs), which each, by their endlessly being repeated as facts have sapped trillions of dollars out of the world by distracting everyone, misleading them into believing and doing stupid things including giving their money to promote and learn more about these silly myths.

Yet again Darwinists, atheists, Arminians, and no doubt some Judaics, have been shown to have massively hindered scientific progress (which results in hindering technological improvement) and which has lead to many to suicide or to continue living a life that gets worse over time due to a lack of trusting in and loving God.

No surprise to me, there is no mention of this professor’s research on Wikipedia’s SSRI pages (but now that I’ve pointed out yet another of it’s glaring deficiencies it will hopefully show up soon).

How fitting that Darwinists, atheists, Arminians, and Judaic’s have been pushing drugs that they claim can make you non-suicidal, when they at the same time warn that it can provoke you to commit suicide (and no doubt to me many witches and Wiccan’s have been claiming that SSRI’s are more beneficial than harmful), fitting, because the logic of anti-Christians is backwards in many ways, due to their hatred of the source of truth: God, who is also the source of life.

See also Potatoes Not Prozac: How to Control Depression, Food Cravings and Weight Gain and The Big Fix: How The Pharmaceutical Industry Rips Off American Consumers for more information if you’d like – books which I’ve been promoting for years.

Earthquakes In Yellowstone from 2008-2010

January 21, 2010 5 comments

Yellowstone Earthquakes Under Supervolcano Caldera

By James Pethokoukis

Posted: December 30, 2008

The headline “Scientists track unusual earthquake swarm beneath Yellowstone” only means one thing to fans of the Discovery channel like myself: supervolcano. Here is what the earthquake center at the University of Utah had to say yesterday afternoon:

The University of Utah Seismograph Stations reports that a notable swarm of earthquakes has been underway since December 26 beneath Yellowstone Lake in Yellowstone National Park, three to six miles south-southeast of Fishing Bridge, Wyoming. This energetic sequence of events was most intense on December 27, when the largest number of events of magnitude 3 and larger occurred.

The largest of the earthquakes was a magnitude 3.9 (revised from magnitude 3.8) at 10:15 pm MST on Dec. 27. The sequence has included nine events of magnitude 3 to 3.9 and approximately 24 of magnitude 2 to 3 at the time of this release. A total of more than 250 events large enough to be located have occurred in this swarm. Reliable depths of the larger events are up to a few miles. Visitors and National Park Service (NPS) employees in the Yellowstone Lake area reported feeling the largest of these earthquakes.

Earthquakes are a common occurrence in the Yellowstone National Park area, an active volcanic-tectonic area averaging 1,000 to 2,000 earthquakes a year.

Rest of the article here.

Yellowstone Quake Swarm Worries Scientists

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Yellowstone National Park was jostled by a host of small earthquakes for a third straight day Monday, and scientists watched closely to see whether the more than 250 tremors were a sign of something bigger to come.

Swarms of small earthquakes happen frequently in Yellowstone, but it’s very unusual for so many earthquakes to happen over several days, said Robert Smith, a professor of geophysics at the University of Utah.

“They’re certainly not normal,” Smith said. “We haven’t had earthquakes in this energy or extent in many years.”

Rest of the article here.

Yellowstone earthquake swarm continues into third day, intensifies

By Howard Pankratz of the The Denver Post

Posted: 01/19/2010 07:59:07 AM MST
Updated: 01/19/2010 04:25:04 PM MST

A 3.5 earthquake hit Yellowstone National Park this afternoon as the swarm of earthquakes that started Sunday continues to intensify.

The earthquake occurred at 2:32 p.m., according to scientists monitoring the current swarm.

Originally, scientists had said two 3.6 earthquakes struck in less than a minute – a mile apart.

A woman at the West Yellowstone, Montana Chamber of Commerce said the earthquake created a “rumble like a truck driving down the road.”

She added that the earthquake caused the icicles on the Christmas tree at the Chamber, which has not been taken down, to shake.

The swarm of earthquakes that started Sunday have now entered their third day.

Earlier today, at 9:48 a.m. , a magnitude 3.3 tremor was recorded.

On Monday night, a magnitude 3.4 tremor was recorded at 8:39 p.m.

Al Nash, spokesman for Yellowstone National Park, said that 469 earthquakes had been recorded in the swarm as of 3 p.m. today.

Nash said the earthquakes have been reported by multiple people in the park itself, and in neighboring communities in Montana and Idaho.

Jamie Farrell, a doctoral student in geophysics at the University of Utah, said the quakes are occurring in an area about 5 miles from where the largest swarm of quakes was ever recorded in October 1985.

The area is six miles due west of Yellowstone National Park’s Lower Geyser Basin, which is several miles north of Old Faithful.

Farrell said that there have been no reports of the quakes affecting the geysers in the park, but added there is a probability they will affect some of those thermal features.

So far scientists monitoring the swarm say the tremors seem to be normal tectonic activity, and is “not an indication” that some sort of volcanic activity will occur. …

Prof. Robert B. Smith, a geophysicist at the University of Utah and one of the leading experts on earthquake and volcanic activity at Yellowstone, said that the activity is a “notable swarm.”

Farrell said there is absolutely no connection between what is occurring in Yellowstone and the magnitude 7.0 earthquake in Haiti.

“They are completely different systems,” said Farrell. “They are not related.”

[“Natural”, systems, he should have said. Just because two thinks have no direct link in nature doesn’t mean God isn’t playing any part, and to rule out indirect effects is stupid, and as if you can see dozens, let alone hundreds of miles beneath the earth.]

Rest of the article here.

Personal Life News

January 21, 2010 4 comments

A cute airforce aerospace  girl is interested in me, and a beautiful girl aiming to be a prosecutor. Prosecutor is out unless she plans on having a really short career, since I don’t want a wife whose priority isn’t taking care of the kids and maintaining the house and land. Hopefully the army hottie is willing to trim her career enough for “home life”. I still need a lot of breathing room for over a year anyways if not, in my opinion. I’m set on two banker girls who were interested in me.

Stupid neighbors are annoying me as usual. A stupid, drunk, noisy, sexually harassing, big-mouthed, whiney, spoiled, impatient, ungrateful, unthankful, very rude neighbor keeps bringing around a crude, brutish, unfunny, criminal in her desperation to have a love life. Hopefully I can get her disgusting self evicted and her stupid sex partner will hopefully stop trying to pitch most likely stolen goods to me and eying my property like a guy craving drugs he can’t get. The drunken girl told me that her dad didn’t raise her with any religion. She hates Christianity and told me that she isn’t interested in religion (or anyone’s philosophy, apparently), is obsessed with vampires and the Twilight movies – big surprise she turned out to be a drunken cutter and a rude, impatient, hysterical, moron. with little patience for anything but what she wants to do, and is dedicated to a childish man whom she believes to be a thief.

Update 1/21:

Lol: a pretty correctional officer wants to date me too. A blonde prosecutor and blonde c.o. So my options are: prosecution, correction or join the airforce.

The Religion of Michael Savage

January 19, 2010 Leave a comment

Don’t We Americans Have Enough Stuff?!

January 19, 2010 Leave a comment

I’ve been reading about the possibility of the American economy being wrecked by China no longer buying “U.S. debt”, mostly trying to (been really busy), and read one journal entry about it, finally, and then read the helpful though painfully grammatically incorrect replies, and came across one comment, from “Dirk”,  that I’d like to reply to. His comment was,

American living standards fall- Ya think, really? Don’t we have enough houses, clothes, and electronics to last for years? Do we really think we can’t substitute domestic energy and luxury goods for foreign energy and luxury goods?

Dirk are you a liberal? If you hadn’t noticed after 10 years of WalMart, Target and KMART, reviews on Amazon, and video showing new ways to recycle electronics, they don’t last long, it’s due to dropping them b accident, batteries wearing out, screens getting scratched, accidentally being submerged (like in a washing machine), errors in manufacturing, not the greatest mechanical designs, toxic chemicals being discovered, devices or parts for devices getting lost, kids who don’t know what they are breaking them in their trying to figure out what it is they are holding, or people high on some drug or drunk accidentally breaking their or someone elses possessions, car accidents, houses, apartments or dedicated business buildings burning down or sometimes being destroyed in earthquakes (along with the electronics in them), or there is always something really irritating about the software.

Further, liberals and eco-morons, either on purpose or due to their incompetence (like declaring carbon dioxide a sin and trying to ban it) prevent or hinder Americans from accessing our great wealth of minerals, oil, our massive amounts of natural gas and other needed things, so that we end up, incredibly, IMPORTING NATURAL GAS! and as everyone knows we’re always robbing ourselves by buying oil from the Arabs and/or Persians.

Further, in order to continue working efficiently we need to increasingly become more advanced, we need hard drives that are able to store an increasing amount of information in the same or a smaller space, increasingly faster hard drives, and faster and faster computer processors. Just because you see a lot of electronics and they are fast for the moment, that doesn’t mean they will last forever or will be able to keep up with our needs forever, a growing population which outputs an increasing amount of information needs ever-advancing technology to live a long, comfortable life.

Sure we can survive by turning inward and developing the USA to meet our own needs, but we have people in leadership and lay people as well who throw wrenches into the Gears of the USA, so that we end up, pointlessly (or rather so that the businesses and friends of our rulers can get rich at our expense) getting resources that we have plenty of here from overseas or next door neighbor counties, including medicine.

Popular Conservative Radio Show Host Bill Cunningham, False Christian

January 18, 2010 Leave a comment

While listening to Bill Cunningham tonight, a popular Catholic radio show host who in his deep narcissism, keeps telling everyone that he is “a great American”. I noticed that he sounded much older, I thought maybe he was sick or dying.

Tonight, this self-back patter said in reply to an apparently fundamentalist Christian, who stupidly defended the fake Christian Pat Robertson:

“I don’t believe in a vengeful God, I believe in a warm, happy, merciful God. … I’m a product of Jesuit training. … I don’t know what God is thinking. …Pat Robertson is good man…”

Bill calls everyone “good” it seems except liberals. He’s called the blasphemer Michael Medved a good man, Michael Savage (who hates him) a good man, Shawn Hannity a good manand now Pat Robertson, a good man. Michael Medved uses “Jesus Christ” as a swear word, Michael Savage mocked God’s word, referring to the wise sayings therein as something some Jewish men said for money. Shawn Hannity is a clearly biased mentally ill, ultra-self righteous fanatic with an extreme bias for Ronald Reagan. No doubt Bill also thinks that Rush The-Exercise-Avoider Limbaugh is a good man – Rush, a man who allowed a caller to say to him, “You are my god”. As for Pat Robertson, Greg Palast exposed Paton audio, saying, “I’m a business man” and not a Christian. And how can Bill call Pat good after the scandal in which Pat justified the Chinese atheist’s government murder of children within pregnant women in order to keep their population from growing “fast”?

Then at about 9:10 P.M., a caller called in and said,

I’m a product of Dominican influence, and God does not will death and destruction on innocent children. …You don’t see many Methodists in the Congo taking care of people with Ebola… and the only hospital that takes care of them in that part of the Congo is Benedictine nuns, you don’t see too many Protestants in that part of the Congo.”

So, this moron Catholic with a boastful tone (which I could hear) condemned all Protestants (which in his ignorance and dumbness stereotyped as all being like Methodists, when Methodists are closer to Catholics as Arminians than 60+ million Protestants who are Calvinists with no Catholics being Calvinists!) as illegitimate Christians, merely because a few nuns are taking care of a few people in one small part of the world! Super moron Catholic: Catholics killed over 45 million people in the past 1000 years and still do with the help of sick, demon-possessed, false Christian, heretics like Mother Theresa (who robbed and tormented the poor, orphans, sick, and dying and who gave off the bulk of her rich donations to the Vatican to hoard), with the help of child-molesting rapist priests AND NUNS all over the world, (including no doubt to those who know what Catholic are really like despite their fakery) in your singled out Nigeria. Your evil whoring kind killed millions of people including hundreds of thousands if not millions of Christians who would not worship your false god popes, popes known for being highly corrupt, and those who broke free from the Catholics, the Protestants, spread learning, and science, and healing and salvation throughout the world, and unlike the Catholics, not approving of turning millions of “savages” into slaves, and who did not participate with Christopher Columbus, a Catholic, in turning the original descendants of Haiti as slaves, nor the preteens of those descendants as sex slaves, nor wiping out, let alone (brutally wiping out) the original descendants in their lust for gold, nor have the participated in the racist persecution of the Haitians, while  Bill Cunningham, before the stupid Catholic caller called in, pointed out that the (Catholic) Dominican Republic, Haiti’s neighbors, treat the Haitians as less than dirt, and murder them for not crimes. How convenient that the Catholic caller did not mention what Bill himself pointed out, though forgetting to mention that the D.R. is mostly Catholic, instead, the caller, a Catholic bigot, was too busy being a self-righteous narcissist persecutor of whoever doesn’t agree with his pagan man- and woman-worship and worship of an imaginary contradictory love-puff god.

Then a Christian of an undisclosed type called him at about 9:44 P.M. and said that he hadn’t mentioned God’s full character, and reminded him of the so called “Noah’s Flood”, and he quickly responded with,

Well I guess that happened too.. he said, ‘The heck with it’…

Then, as if to refute the Old Testament, and replying to the woman who had said that God has cursed nations, said,

…in the Old Testament God was mean and vengeful…

Then, contradicting his refutation within a few seconds, said,

I hope he has bad things to do [to] China…”

And he wished other bad things on other nations and then, contradicting himself right away again!, said,

“I believe in a loving and merciful God…”

And if I remember right finished that sentence with, “who looks upon his children with peace.” Something like that. So Bill believes in an anger-free God, who didn’t punish Jesus in his wrath for anyone’s sins (how typical of a Catholic to forget that powerful and plain fact), yet he wishes God’s punishment upon atheists and liberal, even though God has commanded us to pray for and bless our enemies (how typical also for a Catholic to forget).

Bill Cunningham is not a great American, he is a blind guide.

Check out the book The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement by Jean M. Twenge for more about America’s epidemic of narcissism.

More information on Mother Teresa.

Upcoming Update, Lord Willing

January 15, 2010 Leave a comment

I haven’t forgotten about refuting other stupid things that I heard Michael Shermer say on his last Coast to Coast AM interview, and plan on adding to the last post I made on him.

Michael Savage vs. the Bible, George Noory vs. Reason

January 15, 2010 9 comments

(Updated 1/17/2009/9:07 P.M. )

Michael Savage, as usual, trying to make himself out to be a righteous man, ends up attacking the Christian religion and God which he repeatedly claims to be in favor of, in his attempt to be fair and balanced, by attacking stupid comments by the pseudo-Christian Pat Robertson. Right after I typed that Michael was once again boasting about being one of the most influential conservatives. Tonight, Michael, making cheap shots at Pat Robertson’s own, “You reap what you sow” cheap-shot heresy, also said in response to Pat Robertson’s claim that a few sweat-lodge deaths were a result of not seeking enlightenment of God,

You say enlightenment is to be found in God. What do you tell a little boy who went to a Catholic priest and got the hand of man instead of the hand of God?

At the beginning of his show Michael claimed that he was attacking Pat, a republican, because he (Michael) often spent his time attacking Obama, a liberal, in other words Michael was merely attacking Pat to appear to be balanced. He also claimed that liberals stuck with “morons” like Obama because of what “born again Christians” like Pat Robertson said. Sure Michael, whatever you say is true because you said so; neither Wickedpedia, Absurdapedia nor Boring-to-death-pedia says anything about Pat Robertson claiming to be born again, and I wasn’t able to find such a quote, not that that doesn’t mean he never claimed to be one. So where did Michael get his info? A few minutes later, Michael said, that he wasn’t a Biblical absolutist”, and that “that is one of the points of my exercise: that you can’t take the Bible literally.” Then he attacked some absurd food laws and teachings in the Talmud, and used that as a reason not to be a Biblical literalist. To attack the work of man, the Talmud, which twists God’s word, and claim that makes God’s word corrupt, is illogical. If a man sins, it’s his sin, not someone elses, not God’s.

Michael illogically spoke of Judaics, “born again Christians”, all Christians, and Catholics, as if they were all of the same religion just because they used the Bible in their religion. Clearly Michael is not a scholar of any religion to keep stereotyping everyone who believes in the Bible, or who claims to, to all be at fault for believing the Bible to be true.

And yesterday, a Catholic woman called Michael Savage and ranted a defense for Pat Robertson, why then did Michael claim that it was “born agains” which kept liberals from becoming theists or embracing a religion that Michael sees as good? Why did he single them out? But later he made the child-molesting Catholic priest attack, as if Catholics were also “born agains”, and if that’s not what he meant, he was, regardless, speaking confusion then, being unclear. How, can Michael, claim to be a fair person, how can he complain about being singled out by Britain’s liberal government members to be banned from Britain merely so that they don’t appear to be biased against one kind of religion (Islam) and yet nearly state that he’s attacking P.R. to be balanced? I also wonder why he always gets Christian callers who make stupid arguments whether they are in favor of his drunken speech or against it on whatever topic. It causes me to wonder if the wise ones are being filtered out to keep Michael from looking bad. But it might be that the wise Christians are far out numbered by the stupid ones and that that is why the stupid ones keep getting through. I consider the stupid ones to be all Christians except Calvinists, and in comparison to all other types of Christians, Calvinists are a small number (Roughly 1,640,000,000 false Christians and 60 million Calvinists, which is 27.3 times more false Christians than true Christians).

“I like a certain amount of greed and corruption, I think it’s very healthy for society” – 8:23 P.M., Michael Savage – 1/8/2010

Michael, yesterday and today also repeatedly said that God has nothing to do with the occurrences in the universe, for example this statement from him on his show today:

“It never ceases to amaze me, in a time when common sense should reign – hello tektonic plates move?”

Yes Michael, the ground does move, things do happen in the universe, but how is that an argument against God have anything to do with movements in the universe? It’s not, and he might has well have said, “Things move because they just do” or “Nothing has anything to do with God because things just move on their own”. This is the same Michael who claimed that God was mocking liberals and Global Warming believers by having made it snow in Copenhagen during the recent international summit there to stop Global Warming/Climate Change, the same one who today remembered that God DOES INTERVENE TO HELP. But I can’t remember what he said after remembering that. So, does Michael who endorses belief in God over atheism and agnosticism believe in miracles (rare and amazing events in this universe that God has happen in order to especially have one acknowledge him and or his power)? Interesting how when God punishes Michael’s enemies, Michael magically knows that God is punishing them and takes joy in it, yet when a Bible-believer claims God is punishing someone other than God’s enemies, Michael speaks out against the Bible-believer. That is clear bias and hypocrisy. This is the same Michael who repeatedly speaks out against atheists, and indirectly, against agnostics, and who makes himself out to be a scholar, wise man and scientist.

Anyone can discover a few things as to why something happened, but as is evident, there is a nearly endless chain of previous events that led up to whatever event they are focused on, yet according to Michael, Darwinists have the universe all figured out, and the first event, just happened, because it just did.

Update 1/16/2:45 A.M.:

Yesterday night Michael said that he believed that if you do good good will happen to you, and that this is because of “karma”. What happened to Michael’s nature-did-it explanation? And does good only happen to those who do good? Not according to God, yet Michael in his bias, on the 14th, wanted us all to believe that hurtful events are only due to nature, and that God has nothing to do with them, and now he wants us to believe that good things happen because of karma. So now Michael has reversed his position and indirectly sad that bad will happen to those who do bad by his saying that good will happen to those who do good, and stating that it is because of karma. And what happened to God? So Michael has now robbed God both ways, of God’s just punishment and just rewards, God’s taking and giving to put it another way, and credits a mindless magical omnipresent force. But yesterday, on the 15th, Michael said that he believed that the major religions of the world were like a wheel and that God was at the center of them all (meaning that whatever religion you practice so long as it’s not harming others, according to Michael, will lead you to being in God’s loving presence and having peace with him). But according to Mike’s ranting, God is asleep at the wheel.

No doubt, like my dad, Michael has reached this conclusion based “life after death” claims made by people who have died or left their bodies and were in what they thought was God’s presence or the presence of angels. But his interpretation would be wrong, because, as God has implied in the Bible: One witness is not enough for an extraordinary event. The wisest skeptics know that humans are not reliable witnesses when there is only one witness, even for ordinary events. That doesn’t mean people who have died or left their bodies didn’t really experience anything supernatural, but that their interpretation of the supernatural event/s they experienced are not necessarily correct. Evidence is plentiful that demons exist and have a foothold in this universe, at least on Earth, and are able to twist human perception. I have no doubt that they can create a spiritual illusion for those who have died, surrounding their soul with an illusion, and either influencing their heart to feel wonderous emotions or using the illusion to provoke feelings of great joy and feeling loved. Satan deludes people all the time when they are still alive in their bodies, even to true Christians now and then, so it’s not hard for me to believe he’d do it to someone who is temporarily disembodied, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he does it to many people right after they’ve died, but who don’t come back to life, giving them a few last lies to believe to condemn them further. Somewhat might argue against me claiming that some people who have left their bodies experienced going into Hell and then became a Christian, and therefore Satan isn’t deluding anyone after they die, but there is no evidence to show that experiencing something bad after you die means Satan never deceives anyone who is temporarily dead. Further, there is no evidence to show that Satan (or people who lie in general) only use joy to deceive people. People cause others to suffer all the time to get their way with them, abusing each other into believing some lie. There is no evidence either that when people experience something terrible while dead, that they only become genuine Christians. Further, the Bible makes it clear that Satan doesn’t always succeed in deceiving people, so there is no reason to doubt that Satan doesn’t at times try and fool people into becoming something other than a true Christian using a negative experience/s, and sometimes fails, and the person instead does become a true Christian.

Now onto George Noory. Here are some stupid statements recently made by this man-pleaser:

“Something’s wrong with people, they just aren’t acting right” 1/7/2010

(Just before the January 7th episode of Coast to Coast A.M. ended, George mentioned that he had friends who lived in a haunted house, and then said, “I wonder why these apparitions get mean after a while, they start out friendly.” Because all ghosts are stricken with P.M.S. after meeting a human? Why ask a stupid question, why not just come out and say the obvious: that they are demons?

“Who created the Creator? Somebody had to… It truly is a paradox isn’t it?” – 12:18 P.M./1/8/2010

“[This universe came from] nothing. And how do you comprehend, nothing?” – 12:21 P.M./1/8/2010

Update 1/18/2010:

Today Michael Savage said:

I don’t complain because then God would punish me.

I wasn’t going to note that for anyone here because Michael didn’t say when God would punish him (he could have meant that God would punish him after he died), but then he said at 9:54 P.M. (about thirty minutes later maybe):

“My guess is the children will be punished for the father’s thievery.”

This is the same Michael who bashed Pat Robertson for (allegedly) claiming that the children of Haiti were suffering for what their fathers did hundreds of years ago. What, the, Hell. Talk about a 360 degree reversal. That just proves (to people who aren’t insane or bigot) my claim that Michael was attacking Pat Robertson merely to appear to be unbiased/balanced/fair. It feels good to be proven right on a somewhat complex subject as this. (Note that today the Michael Savage Show was strangely repeating segments of the same show like it usually does on a holiday, so when I say that he said something afterwards, I’m not certain if it was really after wards, it did however come after what I heard while listening).