Archive
Iran, and the Art of War: My World War III Economic Attack Theory

I have a theory, which is, if Iran doesn’t have long range nukes, and has at least three short range ones, and knowing that Israel could easily shoot them down, will attempt another method of devastation: attack the world power economies closest to them: China, Japan and South Korea. Would they do this? There’s no reason for them not to unless their leader is really a greedy man who cares more about money than his personal prophet, Mohammed. The asian countries are mainly Buddhist or atheist, and China is no friend of Islam, but rather, money. Evidence of this is their hard persecution of Muslims in China since Mao’s time of mass murdering to get his way (see http://ns.bdnews24.com/blog/en/index.php/maruf/362). Furthermore, they might time the attack to any Israeli attack on them, to make it hard to determine who made the attack. The Chinese might think Iran launched against Israel, but then Iran sneakily redirects the it’s missiles over China, South Korea and Japan. Iran’s leaders may be hoping that no one would retaliate against them for such an attack as there would no tactical reason to, but only a reason of revenge, and hope that China would launch EMPs or nukes against the Allied Forces in some bitter or paranoid attempt to prevent them from attempting to seize China’s resources and land in their crippled state. My guess is if Iran did make such an attack, that just in case Iran planned to try and seize some of China, that they would get hit with an EMP too, unless they saw that Israel already struck them with one. Russia also would have no tactical reason to hit Iran it Iran was in a crippled state and even if not, probably wouldn’t do so if they could see that Iran had no troops positioned for any kind of invasion of Russia. Russia’s attention would also be focus on retaliation from allied forces (if China had launched its nukes), and probably would get hit with multiple EMP strikes from the Allies anyways. Basically, most of the world would be electronically crippled within hours or perhaps less than an hour.
As the pie chart above shows, such an attack would cause an immediate and very long lasting supply/demand disruption. And suppose they are able to sneak into Mexico, and fire a nuke above Mexico as a sure fire way to do damage, it would cause an additional 19% disruption to the US economy, a total of a 40% long term disruption. America then would be immediately forced to choose between two options: stop sending money to other countries, including Israel, putting Israel in a much weaker position to defend itself, including maintain it’s military technology and use that money instead to start taking down it’s stupid environmental and trade regulations so that we can use our own resources, or use it to repair the electronic infrastructure of the devastated countries, which would cost trillions of dollars, or rather than repair, attempt a take over of the disabled countries. But being that Americans are sick of war, it is more likely they will pull in all their troops from all over the world, even Afghanistan with it’s precious rare earth materials. Iran’s leaders may also hope that by causing such a massive disruption, that the US would go into a civil war, perhaps between the liberals, moderates and conservatives, and the states permanently becoming smaller countries. They may hope that then that the Feds will try to enact a martial law form of government, and revert to an oppressive communist or dictator form of government like Obama and the super rich seem to hope for, and even if it doesn’t happen, a civil war might be caused by the attempt, a second American Revolution. A great internal war in America, would devestating I think, because the Feds would in my opinion release any and every hardened criminal from jail and prison and fill them instead with those directly opposing them through the use of those very same criminals they released, or not care if those criminals kidnapped or murdered rather than turn them in for imprisonment. They may even just allow chaos by release those criminals, and then after everyone has spent all their bullets, come in with military force and easily make slaves of everyone who survives. Whatever happens, a 40% disruption would be severe, and make things much worse than it was during the Great Depression, at least for a month, during which tens of thousands of people may die from panic-rioting and panic-looting.
Such attacks on Asia would also help fulfill the prophecy in the Bible, which says that the kings of the east will head for Israel to attack it, by foot (rather than by plane). If it were by plane it would indicate that the Asian countries I mentioned were not crippled by an EMP, and still had use of their electronic planes therefore. Either that or the Bible is only mentioning the ground forces, and not the air, because the air is not significant in comparison to the ground forces (and also because God doesn’t mention certain things so that not everyone will believe him, being that he doesn’t will/want/wish for everyone to be saved, as the Bible indicates.)
As with the situation that could happen from one superpower launching a nuke at another, an EMP attack could provoke China to strike back with an EMP retaliation itself: in order to protect itself from invasion after such an attack, China might commit an EMP attack on its enemies and competitors: Russia, Israel and the USA. So then, by attacking China, Iran could provoke China into attacking its main enemies. And, if Israel is attacked by an EMP, and a high altitude one, rather than very specific one, the countries around Israel would also be affected. Russia might also launch EMP attacks on the European countries, in order to prevent any of them invading or plundering them in their severely diminished power. All this would seem to fulfill Biblical prophecy perfectly, by mostly reducing the world back to the sword and bow ages (the Bible doesn’t hint at guns, electronics or airplanes being used), which the Bible seems to imply will come about again by the language it uses about how Israel will be attacked and the statement that whoever kills by the sword will die by it. Ironically, some of the weakest nations might become the strongest, even if still weak. It would be those of Africa, especially South Africa, New Zealand, Australia and Britain, and various island nations who have military jets, fighters, and electronic equipped boats all over and around them. However, that would also put them in danger of being prime targets for invasion and plunder by those seeking to regain their former glory and power.
Update 9/1/2012:
Something I realized months ago, but forgot to mention till now, was the likelihood of an EMP attack against the US occurring (and now these other countries I mentioned). I think it is almost certain that it will happen. I believe this because the Bible seems to imply that the world will forget the meaning of 666, what it stands for, and the danger of taking that mark. The only ones who use it in their name at this time seem to be, not surprisingly, psychopaths and extreme ignorants. However the Bible seems to imply it will be accepted world wide. I don’t think that could happen any time soon because even the psychopaths and ignorants would have to know at this time, because of the Internet and huge amount of Bible’s and it’s mention everywhere, including the Internet, of the danger of taking the 666 mark. So then, I think what would have to happen is an extreme disaster that would cause the Internet to be disabled and riots and panic looting causing churches and book stores and libraries everywhere to go up in flames, and Christians fleeing their personal houses/homes with their Bibles to escape looters and rapists. The same would go for hotels which also have Bibles in them. And because of fleeing Christians, there would also be a lack of verbal preaching. So, no literature about the 666 mark or verbal preaching about it. Now, during such a time the lifespans of many people in the world might be about 25 or 30 years like it used to be for a while in the past, due to uncleanliness. An EMP strike would leave all kinds of toxic hazards around in the cities and factories using dangerous chemicals for whatever, that might be tampered with or leak from poor maintenance and break ins, resulting in the deaths of many if the chemicals get into the ground water. And hospitals harbor many dangerous diseases that might spread like fire in an EMP devastated country if people were to go into the hospitals looking for supplies, and ending up being infected with something that resists everything except hard to find herbs and electronic technology.
It could be argued though, that people would take the mark if they were under extreme pressure. For example, in Nazi Germany, most of the population took the mark of the swastika as their national flag even though Hitler was doing clearly very evil things along with his soldiers. And the Bible mentions the truth that a starving person would commit some grievous sin just for some bread. Bribes can also corrupt a person to do extreme evil, as was the case with Judas, and Judas was with Jesus, knew he was good and saw the miracles all about him. Likewise, there are many traitor-like Christians today, over a billion of them, and many ignorant about obvious things the Bible says, and thinking any religion is okay, so long as it doesn’t say of theirs, “You’re religion is wrong” and especially, “And you’re going to Hell if you don’t choose my religion instead.” But because the Bible also seems to imply that the world will go back to a sword and bow age, I think most likely, is that this stupidity of taking the 666 mark, will be due to ignorance. This verse also, seems prophetic to me, but it’s just my opinion:
“Where there is no revelation the people cast off restraint, but blessed is he who keeps the law.” – Proverbs 29:18. Something to note is that the book, Revelation (aka The Apocalypse), is the only book in the Bible that mentions this 666 mark.
The Rise of Atheism, Irreligion, Buddhism, Catholicism, Hinduism, Islam, Crime Rates and Immorality
Post link:
http://crimestats.tk
Some historical facts (they are approximations for obvious reasons):
Over the past 1000 years, the Catholic church killed 50,000,000 people, including a few types of Christian groups worse then them, like the Cathars. Not everyone is equally bad, but as a group they are very bad. Here are some ancient accounts of some of the many persecution-murders they have committed.
Atheists have done worse: In the past 100 years, and in less than that time, they’ve killed 150,000,000 people. Some atheists try to excuse this by saying that atheism just means “no beliefs”, or “no beliefs in gods”, but that doesn’t get rid of the fact that mass murder is done by the atheist group all the time. It would be like a Catholic saying, “Catholicism is just belief in Mary being God’s mother, and praying to her and saints for forgiveness… and doesn’t lead to any other kind of behavior.” And bother groups are always aborting babies, and never with anesthesia, and cutting them to pieces and then throwing them away like trash.
Though these two groups are the worst, so called “pagans” have also done evil, before Rome converted to Catholicism, the pagans there killed about 6,000,000 Christians, including children, and in very cruel ways. It happened from 64 AD to 311 AD. If their rate of killing had continued for 1000 years, as with the Catholics, a total of 24,291,498 Christians would have been killed. Notice how that’s less than half the amount killed by Catholics, so, when they converted to Catholicism, they became more than twice as bad.
Some people say atheists only killed about 81,000,000, supposing that is true, and they killed that many in 90 years, if they continue for another thousand years at that rate, then 900,000,000 people will die. That’s about as many people living in China right now. Because atheists are very oppressive. Right now they have 300,000,000 impoverished citizens, and the government thinks that they are helping them by murdering any second children they have before they are born.
Both Catholics and atheists continue to cause extreme damage to the world. Everyone knows about the problem the Catholic church has with sex crimes committed even by it’s priests, and some know that it hordes the donations it gets, money which is meant for the poor or to buy forgiveness of sins.
Russia, a mostly atheist nation, is suffering from widespread alcoholism and addiction to other types of drugs, especially meth (1) (2). Their population is in decline. The atheist government of China uses much of its money to grow its military, apparently to ready itself to take over other nations, and meanwhile, a third of it’s population is poor, and often abused by their corrupt local government.
Crime in Britain has become very great ever since its atheist population began to grow. Britain’s population was about 31 to 44% atheist. (1) (2)
“A poll published this week by the French newspaper Le Monde shows that the number of people describing themselves as atheists has risen to 31 per cent – from 23 per cent in 1994. The poll also shows that only half the population of France now considers itself to be Catholic.” Crime in France has also been rising since the number of their atheists has increased.
Notice how both in Britain and France, that greater punishments are not stopping the increase in crime (which by the way refutes the claim of many atheists who claim that unlike Christians, they don’t need the threat of punishment to do good, when actually, the threat of punishment has no affect on them in general).
Atheists are so bad as a group, that it’s self defeating, in that their own corruption and self-centeredness works against the spread of atheism.
They expanded artificially in that when they killed off the many religious in their areas, they were the ones left mainly to breed there, but over time, they’ve bought into the false belief that they have to kill off people so that they can keep up their troop population, which is dumb, because if they just let them go to other countries they could send money back to their country.
Buddhism also has a problem, in that it teaches people to be cold, to be like psychopaths, loveless, and to take advantage of others, despite some of it’s laws which are like the “ten commandments”, like not to steal. Examples of the contradictions:
“Associate not with evil friends, associate not with mean men; associate with good friends, associate with noble men.” – Verse 3 of Panditavagga (The Wise Man)
Notice it doesn’t say to be loving yourself, just to associate with “good” friends, whatever that means. Even if Buddha meant to be loving and to only associate with such friends, he then contradicts himself in these verses that come after:
“The good give up (attachment for) everything; the saintly prattle not with sensual craving; whether affected by happiness or by pain, the wise show neither elation nor depression.” – Verse 8
And,
“By having no attachment and desires… and by forsaking sensual pleasures, a wise man gets rid of his impurities.” – Verse 13
So, “have no attachment” and “no desire” for love, goodness, or the company of good friends, or the desire to obey Buddha’s laws. So to practice Buddhism fully leads no where, but to confusion, and for some, insanity. That is why Tibet became so corrupt and oppressive that it was easily defeated by the Chinese atheists.
Here is another contradiction:
“A wise man renounces evil and sensual pleasure and he does all meritorious work in order to attain Nibbana. He becomes a homeless one.” – Verse 12
And,
“My teaching does not require anyone to become homeless” – The Majjhima Nikaya, or “Middle-length Discourses” of the Buddha, is the second of the five nikayas (collections) of the Sutta Pitaka.
Perfectly obeying Buddha is supposed to lead to non-existence according to Buddha, yet he also said,
“Victory brings sadness”>
How can you feel sadness if you achieved victory by not existing anymore?
In Australia, in 2004, were about 4,779,120 people who didn’t believe in God (24% of Australia’s population at that time) according to Mr. Zuckerman. Buddhism greatly spread throughout Australia since at least 1986.
Since 1996, the number of Australians affiliated with the Catholic church grew by 7% to 5.1 million. The Anglicans decreased by 5% to 3.7 million, Uniting Church by 15% to 1.1 million, and the Presbyterian and Reformed churches by 12% to .6 million. The fastest-growing Christian denomination was Pentecostal (which are plagued with Arminians), which increased by 26% to about 220,000 members.
There was decline in irreligious citizens according to the Australian 2006 Census of Population and Housing, which reported that 18.7% Australians said that they were without religion or wrote in a response which was classified as non religious, which is equal 3,706,555 Australians, and which was a decline of 1,072,565 atheists since 2004.
In 2007, the three most common non-Christian religious citizens in Australia were Buddhists, who made up 2.1% of the population, Islam at 1.7%, and Hindus at .7%. Hindus more than doubled since 1996 to 150,000 members and Buddhists about doubled to 420,000 members.
Catholicism was the most common religious throughout Australia, but Catholics made up 18% of the population of Tasmania while Anglicans made 29% of its population.
According to Australian Institute of Criminology’s crime records, overall crime began increasing since at least 1994, then began to decline in 2002 and continued to decline till 2008. Though crimes have in general decreased or remained about the same in Aus., alcoholism and binge drinking have increased, which would be an increase in immorality. The crime rates probably went down in general because of the rise of the Pentecostal denomination, whose adherents obey the Bible’s commandments, including the Arminians among them, however, Arminians eventually stop obeying the Bible out of a greater concern for material things or out of fear of persecution. That can take years, so an increase in crime may not be soon, but it will eventually happen once they start falling away:
Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers, not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by some prophecy, report or letter supposed to have come from us, saying that the day of the Lord has already come. Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for (that day will not come) until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. – 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4
The passage came through apostle Paul, from God. Paul meant that there that the world wouldn’t know who the anti-Christ was until the all false Christians gave up obeying God in mass (in other words, all at once, over a few days or weeks).
Crime will increase for sure once these false Christians decide to live like atheists, and it won’t just increase in Australia, but wherever these Christians are, and they are all over the world. If Catholics are included in this prophecy, then the increase in crime will be extreme, being that there are about 1 billion of them, out of the world’s population, which is about 6,813,592,000 as of 4/9/2010.
In America, atheism or non-religiosity grew since at least 1990. The proportion of the American population that can be classified as Christian has declined from 86% in 1990 to 77% in 2001. (ARIS survey). And in there were 10 percent fewer religious people in 2008. The crime rate went down according to some websites, but it’s untrue, because it doesn’t take into account legalized crime, like the Drug War and Iraq War and Afghanistan War, in which police and military are paid to do illegal things. Scroll to the bottom of this website where it says “US Arrests“, and you can see how arrests have risen. Now though it’s not a crime in the Bible to have or smoke marijuana, even if your government says that it is illegal (because you can’t make a law that contradicts God’s legally, like telling people it’s illegal to medicate yourself), and even though the arrests rose, those figures don’t represent true crimes, but imagine all the police that had to do wrong when doing those arrests, and think about all the wrongs that police do all the time that they get away with, and all kinds of crimes in America that go unreported:
“It is estimated that for every one case of elder abuse, neglect, exploitation, or self neglect reported to authorities, about five more go unreported.” – National Ctr. on Elder Abuse, The Am. Pub. Hum. Serv. Ass’n, The National Elder Abuse Incidence Study, 1998, (source).
And,
The FBI estimates that only 37% of all rapes are reported to the police. Bureau of Justice Statistics are lower-only 30.7% reported the crime. – National Criminal Victimization Survey, 1996
According to this site 10 to 14 percent of all rapes in America are marital rape. If there was such a thing, then there are still at least about 23% non marital rapes.
Police officers are also told to lie about crime activity in San Diego.
So, reports like this, are false.
At
http://www.adherents.com/misc/adh_prison.html
, statistics are shown which show that even though atheists make up a small amount of the America’s population, they make up a high number of America’s prison populations, especially if you count Buddhists as atheists. There are more Catholics in prison but this is because there are many more Catholics than atheists and Buddhists in America. And for those who want to point out the larger number of “Baptists” in prison, I’ll bet anyone $1000 that most of those Baptists are Arminians, and mostly ones who know little about basic Biblical teachings or the history of Christianity or the Bible and so are not truly Christians.
If a person believes in looking the other way when they see a crime in their neighborhood, it endangers the lives of their neighbors. If they believe in doing crimes that makes it unsafe for their neighbors too. If they believe in fighting against crime, by prayer or reporting it peacefully to news agencies, that can help make it safer. What you believe matters, it affects how much you will decide to learn and what your actions will be: good, or evil.
This post can be reached at
http://crimestats.tk
or
http://correlations.tk
Artificial Earthquakes, Biblical Prophecy and the End of the Federal Government
If it’s true that the U.S. government is causing artificial earthquakes, then some people might not think that Jesus’ prophecy on earthquakes increasing isn’t coming true, because he was referring to so called “natural” or divine earthquakes. The Bible doesn’t say that though, nor did Jesus say that “rumors of wars and wars” would be natural or divine. Rumors are spread by man and man makes wars (and with demons in part provoking them to do evil). The Bible seems to imply in Revelation, that mankind will become aware that such powerful events are acts of vengeance by God, but if speculation and belief that it is the U.S. (Federal) Government causing the earthquakes grows worldwide, then the focus would be taken off God as the one causing them, or at least through someone else supernatural, like an angel or demon. If it is true that this would cause confusion as to who or what is causing the increase in large earthquakes or sway too many people to take their focus off God, then God may destroy or disband the Federal Government so that that speculation or belief stays small or is completely gone. So, it may be that you could roughly determine when the Federal Government would cease to exist based on the rate of increase of speculation on what is causing an increase in major earthquakes and/or what is causing major earthquakes to occur more so in areas with a high population. In my opinion he would cause earthquakes in Washington D.C., Cheyenne Mountain, the HAARP area, all the “g. God may also destroy the military bases that store UFO technology or cause severe disruption globalist power control centers” (like The City, in London, which is some elitist city there) and do so on a regular basis. However, because of the many alien visiting Earth, people might think it might be alien attacking the evil people of the world and/or getting ready to invade us. To prevent most people from thinking that, God would probably cause earthquakes all over the world like places with low population to none, like Antarctica and Greenland or areas of the oceans like happened to Japan and Indonesia. Then the world would realize it’s not human or alien intelligence simply targeting certain areas, but a sign that the return of Jesus is nearing.
Currency Trader On Michael Savage Says Europe’s Condition is 10 Times Worse than USA’s
I was just listening to Michael Savage, and a currency trader called in to tell him that George Soros isn’t going to tell people what he’s doing, and then do it, but will do the opposite of what he announces. He also said that the financial condition of the Europe was “ten times worse” that the USA’s. A few seconds later he said, “Do you really think that they have anything better than what’s in the United States?”?
Hmmm.
Will Baby Boomers Bankrupt America’s Social Security Program?
from reuters.com:
First U.S. baby boomer applies for Social Security
10/15/2007/5:17 P.M. EDT
by Donna Smith
WASHINGTON – Retired school teacher Kathleen Casey-Kirschling on Monday became the first ripple in a “silver tsunami” of retiring baby boomers applying for pension benefits that threatens to overwhelm U.S. government finances.
Casey-Kirschling was born one second after midnight on Jan. 1, 1946, and will receive her first Social Security check in February 2008 as the first wave of baby boomers turns 62 next year and becomes eligible for early retirement benefits.
Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue said the agency is bracing for some 80 million Americans to apply for retirement benefits over the next two decades. – More here.
from cnbc.com:
Will Baby Boomers Bankrupt Social Security?
2/8/2010/10:41 A.M. ET
by Rob Reuteman,
As the record federal budget deficit draws increasing scrutiny from Washington to Wall Street to Main Street, deficit hawks may take aim at entitlement programs including Social Security.
Photo: Jonathan D. Colman
And, the nearly 80 million Baby Boomers phasing into retirement will set in motion a dynamic that—if not addressed by Congress—could result in the next generation getting fewer benefits.However, despite fears that Boomers will trigger a collapse of Social Security, experts say the system can and will survive for decades and generations to come.
Congress made significant fixes to Social Security during the 1970s, the 1980s and the 1990s, and there appears to be a slowly gathering political will to make it solvent for the next 75 years.
By 2017, Social Security is expected to start paying out more than it collects in payroll taxes, according to the 2009 Annual Report from the Social Security and Medicare Board of Trustees. There is currently a large surplus, but it will be drained by the year 2037. At that point, Social Security will only be able to pay out 75 percent of its benefits.
A separate report, done by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, concludes much the same thing, but gives the system another 10 years before it begins to fall apart.
Tom Brokaw Reports BOOMERS Click here for program information
The trustees’ annual report “does not depict a program in crisis,” said Kathy Ruffing, of the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. “Policymakers should act sooner rather than later to put the program on a sound long-run footing, but today’s beneficiaries and workers approaching retirement need not fear that their Social Security benefits are at risk.”
“Alarmists who claim that Social Security won’t be around when today’s young workers retire misunderstand or misrepresent the trustees’ projections,” she added.
Beginning the Boom
Looking back, the outlook was rosy for most Americans in 1946, the year earmarked as the beginning of the so-called “baby boom.” With World War II finally over, a 15-year stretch of bad times that had begun with the great Depression was finally over. They responded by having more babies than ever before, more than 78 million of them by 1964.
For Social Security, the mini-population explosion was both beneficial and problematic. Social Security is funded mostly through payroll taxes, with present-day workers funding the payouts for retirees. Since there have been so many Boomers in the workforce for so many years, there were a lot more people putting money into the system than taking it out.
As Boomers begin to retire, the huge group of people putting money into the system will begin taking it out of the system, which then will be funded by a generation of workers—the so-called Gen X—whose numbers are some 15 million fewer. The surplus of money paid into the system by Boomers will allow it to run into the late 2030s, even though it will begin paying out more than it takes in by 2017.
“We won’t have a crisis,” says Michael Astrue, commissioner of the Social Security Administration. “2037 is a long way off and there is no reason to panic, but this is a serious issue we need to resolve. Younger people tend to overreact.” – More here.
An EMP Attack + the Super Blizzard + the Wrecked Economy
I suddenly became aware that Mahmoud, Iran’s leader, made his threat to strike the world’s super powers at one of the worst times in America’s history: America’s economy is nearly stagnant, there are many millions of people out of work who need money, and large amounts of snow are blanketing America, and causing mass power-outages in some places, even government activities in Washington D.C. have been mostly halted for four days now. If America was hit with an EMP now, millions of people would die within a few weeks unless other countries came to help us right away.
If there is no “stunning punch” Mahmoud and Iran’s head religious leader would reveal themselves to be liars and cowards themselves, just as they called the non-fighting-inclined Muslims of the world, and it would do great damage to their brand of Islam, and perhaps help spread “positivity” among the American troops in Afghanistan. On the other hand, he may intentionally be intending to fool the world into thinking that he is just someone who makes empty threats, in an attempt to remove concern from their nuclear technology development activities.
Liberals Vote Lady Gaga as Woman of the Year, Not Snookie!
Lady GaGa Voted “Woman Of The Year”
(12/18/09 2:06 PM)LOS ANGELES, California – After an incredible year, Lady GaGa topped the list of MTV’s “Women of the Year” for 2009.
GaGa was EVERYWHERE this year, from the top of the Billboard charts to award shows to Gossip Girl and, of course, on X17online!
Kudos to GaGa for being voted top Woman of the Year over at MTV.
The rest of the list was rounded out by:
from X17.
Britney Spears was at 6 and Beyoncé at 4. The great, genius, moral Snookie was no where to be found in the top ten, or even hundred. Maybe they’ll vote Tiger Woods as man of the year. Gator Aid, Nike, AT&T and Gillette and his oh so beautiful model-wife seemed to think he really deserved it, for many years. Don’t you love the moral judgment of liberals?
More Stupidity On Coast to Coast A.M.?
"Climate change is very real. Global warming creates volitility. I feel it when I’m flying. The storms are more volatile. We are paying the price in more hurricanes and tornadoes.” No, that’s not from some guest on Coast to Coast AM. That’s from Senator Debbie Stabenow (D., Mich.), as recorded in an interview with Detroit News in August 2009.
mere children will govern them.
People will oppress each other—
man against man, neighbor against neighbor.
The young will rise up against the old,
the base against the honorable.
The look on their faces testifies against them;
they parade their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it.
Woe to them!: They have brought disaster upon themselves.
Tell the righteous it will be well with them,
for they will enjoy the fruit of their deeds.
Woe to the wicked! Disaster is upon them!
They will be paid back for what their hands have done.
Youths oppress my people,
women rule over them.
O my people, your guides lead you astray;
they turn you from the path.”
Isaiah 3:4-5, 9-12
FBI Agent “Joe” Says FBI and Albuquerque Police Dept. Won’t Do Anything About Cyber-stalking
According to an FBI Agent Joe of the Albuquerque division of N.M., if a U.S. citizen is being harassed and stalked on the Internet the F.B.I won’t do anything about it and the (A.B.Q.) police department “definitely won’t do anything”, and that even if someone from another country says they are going to come over and kill you (or tries to extort money from you) that they won’t do anything either because “other countries hate the U.S.”. He also said that he’d only used the Internet twelve times on his laptop and never intends to use it again because of the bad things he’s heard about it including identity theft and various other things. He also blames whoever is stalked on the Internet for being stalked because they must have done something to piss the other person off, and if they did it’s their fault. He also said he’d never dealt with a cyberstalking case (backing up his claim that the FBI doesn’t deal with such things). He said that people have a right to say whatever they want on the Internet because it’s a place of “free speech”.
When asked if stalking was harassment, he hesitated for a moment, and then, said “well yeah”, apparently having forgotten the meaning of the word. I have the impression from his tone and beliefs that he’s someone who would call himself a non-practicing Catholic or an atheist, perhaps an agnostic.
Joe said these things on 6/2/2009, on about 8:25 A.M. Hmmm, could his apathetic attitude towards cyber-stalking and, his stereotyping of every single person of every other country and his blame-the-victim attitude be one of the reasons that many people of other countries who aren’t citizens of the U.S. hate the U.S.? Alex Jones your nightmare is becoming more real.
This reminds me of a mormon I once met online named Bree. She was extremely beautiful and flirted with me a tiny bit at one point, but when I asked her to give some evidence for some things about Mormonism she took offense. She was a top member of a pofile site where I had refuted her emails against my religion which were refuting hers. She was friends in person with the moderators there, and they showed her great favoritism. Being unable to refute me and having enraged her with a website I made exposing her hypocrisy, the moderators allowed her to become a moderator of the forum of their site, and she dedicated a thread to attacking me and attempting to spin my website on her as a “hate site”.
She was eventually so humiliated, with apparently a member of the same site saying about me, “the ‘stalker’ is right” after I had refuted a Wiccan defending Bree who claimed Wiccan’s had no written laws after I said they did and proved it, was the straw that broke Bree’s back, that she resorted to publicly trying to incite everyone on her side to burn my house down. The moderator deleted her comment after allowing it to remain for many hours (the forum moderators were her personal friends and favored her). When I pointed out her hypocrisy it seemed to get her threat deleted, but no surprise, this anti-religious profile site didn’t delete her account. The male moderator in charge did however have me repeatedly banned and being unable to defeat me tried to contact others about how he could prevent me from coming back to that forum using technological means. Bree was extremely beautiful, one of the most beautiful I’d ever seen, and she was as mormon as any mormon I had ever met, fiercly defending that her religion was right.
After repeatedly showing her that her that her religion was wrong and was founded upon racism in part, I noticed she eventually stopped talking about being a Mormon on her profile page. The moderator in his attempt to justify Bree and Mormons (arbitrarily, to get me to get me to shut up) made an accidental comment that made it okay for blacks to be discriminated against. When I pointed out his error, he had the entire thread that Bree made deleted, in an attempt to prevent his and Bree’s errors from becoming well-known obviously.
Bree eventually sent me an email on that site saying she was lost cause (meaning I would be unable to lead her to Christ successfully) because she had been ruined by others (which she apparently meant had harassed and deceived her).
After a few years went by, Bree eventually deleted her profile, and I could it was from people against Mormonism and harassment from people against religion. Despite her atheist moderator friends being against all religion, she remained a defender of obeying God, sadly, only with her mouth. What she believes now after she deleted her profile, I don’t know.


