Home > atheists, narcissists > Dumbness from the Netherlands: A Dumb Narcissist Atheist’s Babble Against My Journal

Dumbness from the Netherlands: A Dumb Narcissist Atheist’s Babble Against My Journal

At onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com (what a great blog link! *rolls eyes*), can be read a little, useless rant against religion, “fundamentlists” and my journal specifically (though not really specifically since this idiot is vague and too busy posting pictures apparently). Here is my reply to “Himself” an anonymous coward and spamming troll with obvious narcissism disorder (his dumbness is in quotes):

Signs of narcissism disorder:

Strike 1: “Only In America” your blog title. So American Christian “Fundmentlists” only have journals in America? No angry moron who is too dumb to spell fundamentalist right. No. There are over 25 million fundamentAlists you idiot, try and use your pathetic imagine in place of your lack of common sense. Sign of narcissism: making absurd statements without any evidence using truncated grammar, like the cliche “Only in (place location here)”, a cliche usually said with smugness. Narcissists are smug and use clichés.

Strike 2: “What claim has your piety on my deference?” What did you just say narcissist? Narcissists love to use high sounding clever speech, but which is often word salad. Two strikes, and you’ve still gotten no where.

Strike 3: “Can You Overdose on Irony, or Ignorance, or Insanity?” Narcissists regularly use pretentious ad hominem attacks in rhetorical form (insults without evidence asked in question form in which the asker does not believe an answer or explanation is needed to prove the question, with a tone of smugness as if the feelings of the narcissist make them right). Tone? The tone is set by the title and previous quoted statement: smug arrogance and “Can you overdose” which is yet more word salad. Strike three, and you’ve not explained anything, but have shown off how you can arrange a few uncommon words together in an attempt to appear smart, wise, witty, in an attempt to appear as if you are reasonable and know what you are talking about.

Strike 4: “Knight’s Christian Commentaries and Worldwide News

“It’s funny” Strike four: cliche.

Strike 5: “where you come across links to outlandish sites;” Strike five: word salad, the statement is grammatical wrong. Strike six: “outlandish” a narcissists drama word.

Strike 6: Talk origins, Wikipedia and dumb blogs are outlandish? Good job idiot. And of course moron who argues before listening, moron who judges by mere appearances, “outlandish” is whatever you say it is.

Strike 7: “the one I am about to leave you,” long drawn out word salad drama, typical narcissist behavior. You’re “about to leave”? How about “the one here” idiot? Is speaking plainly really that painful Mr. “I Must Sound Special and Wiser Than Everyone Else”?

Strike 8: VAGUE: SO WHAT IF I LINK TO “OUTLANDISH SITES”: DON’T YOU LINK TO MINE WHICH YOU CALL “OUTLANDISH”? THINK EVIL IDIOT, THINK, STOP BABBLING VAGUE BABBLE. Who can stand morons like this?
“I found at an oasis of reason, secular of course.”

Strike 9: more pretention, another cliche: “of course” still no evidence to justify the attitude of superiority or attacks.

Strike 10: “Religion Poisons”; More attacking without evidence, truncated grammar, ambigous, over generalization. Typical of narcissists to commit all these fallacies in one statement.

Strike 11: “But I don’t know how to describe, Knight’s Christian Commentaries and Worldwide News”

Strike 12: more long drawn out drama. Stike 11: dumbness: “I don’t know how to describe this title that self describes what the journal is about”, which might as well be word salad. And at this point, you could call all this ranting immature too, another sign of narcissism disorder.

Strike 13: “and do justice to it.” Yet another cliche and more drawing out the imaginary drama.

Strike 14: Mr. Word Salad Drama King, why would you have to do a journal over over 700 pages with links to atheist dumbness galore, quoting endless useless anti-logic dumbness like yours, hatred like yours, and links to sites that show evidence with truth without the time-wasting “I got bullied when I was an arrogant kid and now sit in my chair playing arm-chair bully to make myself feel better and as a form of revenge”.

Strike 15: what does a picture of a giant bunny have to do with anything you’ve so far ranted about which I’ve quoted? Typical sign of a narcissist, immature and nonsensical.

Strike 16: What does a picture of a half naked lascivious woman have to do with what you’ve ranted about? Typical sign of a narcissist, immature and nonsensical. It’s also a form of attack to show such a thing when you’re arguing against someone you know who is against immorality, which is the same as plugging your ears up so that you don’t have to hear the proper argument and rebuke back you evil moron. And that is futile, being that one day, you will face the God you are responsible to for your sins, rather than get away with it, as you think in your fantasy-chasing, deslusion mind.

Strike 17: What do the two links you linked to have to do with anything other than being links to Christian sites? More nonsense.

Strike 18: What does your tag “Batshit crazy” an ad hominem attack, a pretentious parroted phrase, and which is also worthless tag (and why did you capitalize it moron?), have to do with… oh, you’re calling your rant batshit crazy, okay.

Strike 19: If you’re too dumb to spell fundamentalist right, why did you even bother writing attacks against it?

Strike 20: Since you have no argument, that is why you bulked up that little paragraph of a rant with pictures, and since you’re a troll spammer, you included those pictures hoping they’d show up in Google and Bing’s image galleries and lead people to your worthless rant, a typical sign of a narcissist: draw attention to yourself using immoral tactics to do so, because narcissists love attention.

Strike 21: “Overdose”? I’ll translate this arcane idiot, who probably doesn’t even understand why he used that word: That’s this pretentious narcissists way of expressing that anything he reads on my site is a book, it’s an expression of a narcissist or a person who has extreme hatred for truth. In other words, “I hate these truths, reading anything you say is reading a book”. People who say things like, “you’ve written a book” when they read a letter they don’t like, or pamphlet, are implying that what you’ve written is too long (and almost always, people who say such things, never explain why, so it’s just another, “I hate you and don’t want to read what you’ve said/the truth” ad hominem type attack, and ironically, are saying they hate reading books or anything long, at least by being vague by saying “you’ve written something very long” and not explaining why something very long is a bad thing. And that being true, it could be said that they are stupid and don’t know much because they hate reading much, and it’s in part by reading much that a person becomes wise and is no longer stupid. Basically, a person saying, “you’ve written a book” are saying they are lazy and implying they are being forced to learn something instantly and shouldn’t have to read much in order to reply to you. It’s also typical of such people to hypocritically write the same amount they rejected reading or much more, at least over time, and expecting and hoping everyone will read what they’ve said. No lazy guy, no narcissist, no one is forcing you to read 700+ pages all at once. Be patient and learn the truths you hate and believe those truths rather than shitting on them.

Also, this guy is talking about overdosing because he opened a huge amount of pages on my journal one after another some within one minute others after a minute. Patience idiot, patience, not “overdosing”. Stop teaching people to be careless and stupid.

Strike 22: Did you think your little rant (the parts which I didn’t quote I ignored completely since the parts I did see, including “Batshit crazy” showed you had no argument, just angry babble), could refute a religion that has lasted over 6,500 years, since the start of the first two, Adam and Eve? Your little crazy nanny nanny boo boo rant would defeat the world’s best selling most influential book? Do you really think using “fundamentalist” (at least you didn’t say Calvinist, but probaby because you’re too stupid and obsessed with figuring out which cliche and high sounding phrase to come up with next to learn much) with a negative tone, a “oooo dey are bad” would defeat us, guy who is in a pathetic minority, even smaller yet being that you’re in the narcissist minority? It’s true that smarter versions of morons like you are in control of many prestigous universities, but you’re hardly winning just because you can say, “The heads of Princeton agree with my babble! Now God and that silly Bible is defeated!” No, the world’s best selling, most freely available, translated into the most languages, most influential, cannot be and will never be defeated by a little group of atheists narcissists saying, “Oh do indeed oh my my my we are the bestiest, you are fundiementaliests, we are the oasees of reeson, you my dear friends are not.” Have fun pretending to be Emporers of the Universe and Spokespersons for the Universe, including the millions of Christians you babble against (you are extremely oblivious and have major delusions of grandeuer), anonymous coward while you can, because your next stop will be Judgment Day and an eternity in Hell for you to remember that day of revenge, but a day of rewards for all your enemies, the “fundamenlists”.

What is fundamentalism, why do morons like this hate it with such hate? The book that started it all, which was by a “Calvinist” (a type of “Reformed Christian” aka type of Protestant – people who opposed and still oppose the Catholic Church for their heresies, blasphemies and polytheism, and who oppose everything that is wrong), can be read here: The Fundamentals; a testimony to the truth (written all the way back in 1910).

The original fundamentalists were the believers of that book, the so called Calvinists, enemies of the fake Christians (the ones who make a serious effort to be Christians, not the people who think being born to Christian parents makes them a follow of Christ themselves, or that simply believing in Christ makes them a Christ-follower), who can be classified as Arminians. Arminians are obsessed with or brainwashed into believing that free will is thee thing to care about, not God. Many of them are narcissists and many of them are narcissists just like this guy “Himself” and by the same signs they can be identified. You can learn more about narcissism disorder from one of the tabs linked above or at the much more extensive http://narcissism.tk

The true oasis of reason is God, his word, and his people, not the bigotry of atheism cults, secularist cults, false fundamnetalists, fundamentalist liberalism cults, New Agers, pagan cults, scientism cults or moronic blogs from bigoted Netherlanders like “Himself”, yes: this idiot isn’t even in America. Fail.

About these ads
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers

%d bloggers like this: