While watching In the Arena on CNN today, maybe an hour and forty minutes ago, I heard from some woman with brown hair, that machines were taking jobs away from people. It occurred to me then that America’s unemployment problem could in part be solved by cybernetic enhancements. And after thinking about that, motorized exoskeletons should also help. Another solution would be finding a way to add more brain cells, connect certain ones so that they are more efficient, and if necessary, using stem cells, retroviruses, and genetic manipulation. The attempt to integrate electronics directly into the human body may be partially hindered by globalists and elitists, who may fear the poor and so called “common” people being able to enhance their brain power, which would help them to see past the lies of the globalists and elitists and compete with or dominate them.
I started this post about about 2 hours ago and finished it in about 30 minutes, and two hours later looked for relevant info on Sciencedaily, and had a “woah” (synchronicity) moment when I saw a story on a breakthrough in the featured space near the top right: synthetic synapses, which could be used to make artificial brains: There is a God for sure.
New: I also saw yesterday on the bottom of Sciencedaily homepage a story from Reuters about certain scientists working on an artificial nerve controlled leg.
4-23-2011 7:27 am:
In addition to the above, I would have the states take back the private park areas that the Federal Government has illegally annexed, to be used for whatever purpose the states want to use them for, unless it’s for illegal reasons. The land should be sold to American citizens only, at cheap prices, to ones who have not been convicted of anything more than a few traffic accidents while not intoxicated or anything more than a few petty crimes. Hopefully, this would help generate enough money so that there would enough to help create affordable cybernetic technology.
Another way to help American’s compete with machines, besides integrating them into their bodies, would to create machines with pseudo-intelligence specifically designed to do work for them. Such machines are commonly called “robots”. These robots could be used to assist citizens for non-job related work which would help save energy that they could use for looking for jobs or at jobs. Their personal robots (P.R.s) could also be used to do job-related work for them, and they could still be paid for their work even if the machines were entirely doing the work for them. Technology should be developed that could allow humans to directly control robots using wireless signals from technology implanted into a person’s brain.
Another way to lessen the severity of poverty among the poor and to increase the wealth of those just above poverty, would be by planting hardy edible plants of various kinds able to grow in the area being planted, and along the sides of trails, roads, lawns, backyards,, desert land and playgrounds, which could be eaten in place of or in addition to priced food and drink. Such plants would be [paid content].
What the Crackpot Troll Moderators of PhysicsForums Didn’t Want You To See, Because None of their Darwinist and Big Bang Believer Members Nor Their Darwinist Big Bang Cult Moderators Could Refute In Any Scientific, Logical or Mature Way, In Fact: HAD NO RESPONSE TO, Not Even After Day Had Passed.
A very long silence speaks loudly.
The philosophical and religion ignorant moderators of PhysicsForums didn’t want anyone to see this reply to a comment one of their members made in a post in PhysicsForums on Void Theory (three times it was posted, and three times they removed it using insults as there reasons, no science at all, and attempting to be feelings and thoughts police). And what got one of them to remove it? When a called a newbie to knowledge moron member named Nick an insulting troll who put words in my mouth, a moron with three posts on his belt in PhysicsForums, named Nick, for saying I was pretending to believe that Earth was no older than 6,500 years old, and that “it wasn’t impossible” that the Bible used figurative language, and assuming (or rather ignoring that I wasn’t) a newbie to science, literature or religion, pointed me to the figure of speech page on Wikipedia. So, his assumption that some verse/s(?) somewhere in the Bible (couldn’t be bothered to read it himself of course), because it was possible figurative language, made me wrong, and for that my first reply below was REMOVED (but I wasn’t banned) and then what? Remove three more times despite there being no replies to them, and Nick’s reply was also removed. And for reposting my first reply, I was repeatedly banned (why, if it didn’t get me banned the first time when everyone saw it and it stayed for 24 hours?). And here is the first reply that stumped, embarrassed and humiliated the weak minded moderators and anti-creationist members of PhysicsForums:
The problem with the big void of smaller density leading to apparent dark energy term is that we have to be very close to the center of the void, otherwise everything will look anisotropic. Being close to the center is HIGHLY improbable, much more improbable than being in a void at all.
Why is shoutingly HIGHLY improbable? Because you said so? NO! BECAUSE YOU ARE DELUDED, REPEATEDLY IGNORING THE DESIGN OF GOD ALL AROUND YOU AND PRETENDING IT’S RANDOM. Nothing is impossible for God, except lying. What a contradiction too: Do you think the Big Bang was HIGHLY probable? How about it being HIGHLY probable let alone at all, despite evidence repeatedly being found against it, and pointing towards a 6,500 year old universe? And where are you instincts?: You think it’s probable regardless of the repeated contrived explanations to get rid of giant problems like the billions of light years wide void in space?
What about this contradiction: It’s highly unlikely we live in the center of a void, of the universe, but it is for light of countless many kinds, countless many types, randomly, by unknown means, with many distinct emotions, a heart, desires, mind, will, self-awareness, conscience, soul, extremely complex DNA, beauty of countless kids and types wherever you look, sometimes astonishingly beautiful, life that dances, sings, sleeps (something which has been a mystery for thousands of years or millions if you believe the Big Delusion) imitates for fun, has humor (a very hard to explain thing), plays games (came up with chess, for which no perfect solution has yet been found), tries to solve everything (to various degrees), even how to create other life with understanding of how exactly to do so from start to finish, can naturally/supernaturally reproduce in three different ways: cloning, sex, and self fertilization, can withstand all kinds and types of damage, and REPAIR themselves without knowing how, and still live and flourish, on a planet on which food and drink of all kinds exist, and useful poison, with material that can form countless useful things, and though being recombined in endless ways still be beautiful, forms of life which rely on each other, help each other, and even love each other, and able to communicate in thousands of different languages or more.
Also explain to me how it is probable that various flies evolved to look almost exactly like bees, despite the upheavals all over the world that were so great they magically got rid of the trillions of transitional fossils that should exist. Please explain the fly I saw, which hovered and turned like a machine, which when I first saw thought was a Cecada Killer, but as I concentrated on, saw was a giant fly (a small strip of forest in Reston, VA). So a fly, evolved, over billions of years, to look like a somewhat related animal, with superior flying ability? That’s probable?! And not just one fly, but there is mimicry of all kinds! Even bacteria and viruses have mimicking abilities DESIGNED to fool the things they live on. And is it probable that seeds from plants would germinate after thousands of years, or millions? I haven’t looked, but I wouldn’t be surprised if someone has or will discover a seed in millions of years old strata that germinates.
And though life is often very hostile and even self-destructive, it’s flourished, with all the kinds life forms that existed in the past, still existing. And life has flourished so much, that many humans even fear “overpopulation” and come up with evil schemes to murder most people rather than schemes to populate other planets (because they are silly and evil morons with little conscience and morals). And we’ve even succeeded in going to other planets. And, there are obviously spirits, many of which clearly hate us, and though clearly having the ability destroy us, are obviously being prevented from doing so, by what are clearly good spirits, which sometimes show their presence in some way when they save a life or lives. It’s also clear, unless you’re stupid or ignorant or a stubborn God-hater, that aliens are visiting us every day, or if not visiting, having bases on Earth or nearby, and sight-seeing, even showing off to some degree I would guess. Why are there very beautiful light-up jellyfish at the bottom of the oceans? Are chameleons and cuttlefish that can also camouflage themselves AND LIGHT UP in various ways probable? What about octopi that can camouflage themselves and hide themselves in a cloud of blackness? Is it probable that life is able to flourish at the very bottom even underneath the oceans of the world? Is it probable that there would be life living in boiling ocean water at the bottom of oceans, or boiling tar, or that could survive extreme heat then extreme cold then extreme radiation, and in space? How probable was it that the Crotoniidae mite would “reevolve” the ability sexually reproduce after millions of years? What are the odds of that happening after an alleged millions of years? Yet ALL OF THAT is probable to you, from randomness? And just how many random universes do you know of that existed before to imply we are probable? And if you believe i random universes exiting before, then why would you say it’s HIGHLY improbable that we live in the center of a void? Confused much? In addition to all that, you think that all is probable, even with living “fossils” repeatedly being found, inferior in design to their giant armored forms WHICH DIDN’T SURVIVE while the smaller weaker forms did, and giant ones like Brontosaurus with inferior armor to other dinosaurs still surviving (and/or living comfortably) in the Congo, and unarmored snakes, even giant ones, surviving despite having no legs or arms or wings and a massive body exposed to easy damage? And not only have many snakes that grow to giant size survived, but can live for many decades. How do animals know how to reproduce, eat, find food, sing, dance, protect themselves, walk, fly, glide, climb, dig, slither, and some, even birds, can make tools. Is that probable? Is it probable that insects and cats have brains faster than the fastest publicly known super computers? Can you explain why dolphins, cuttlefish, octopi and parrots are as intelligent as they are? Can you explain how the Lyre bird evolved its ability to imitate any sound? How did the Bombardier beetle evolve? How do skunks know that its musk glands will repel other animals? And how do flowers know when to bloom, the beauty and scent of many which attract man to spread more of them?
Can you also tell me how probable it was for all life on the planet to have evolved into its many forms over billions of years, with everything else I mentioned? How probable also is it that when Daniel Tammet hit is head that he acquired god-like calculation and communication abilities? How does evolution explain Euler, Ramanujan and Tesla? And no doubt there are other such geniuses, who get no where because their minds have been filled with science-hindering lies and liars who go around making stupid insults to scare them into submission like, “God did it (so no need to learn anything)”. No, “evolution did it, so rape doesn’t matter, nor murdering the unborn, BUT, Christians are EVIL who dare judge that that rape and child murder are evil, and that unnatural sex which leads to population decline, which leads to fewer minds to save the world from murderous atheists and pagans. How dare they believe an old book full of contradictions and missing books! How dare they continue knowledge and preserve it! Why can’t they just forget like us and come up with new things that might be true and faith that they are true? Let’s rape and encourage pornography and abuse and murder children. Or, let’s just drink more beer and play games while trying to save the world by letting it kill itself off, so that there is less carbon dioxide, because, I don’t want to evolve to live under the ocean.” And do you think all of that is probable, including man’s extreme stupidity despite his extremely intelligent mind with it’s massive umber of neurons all interconnected (why is man so stupid and why does he do such great evil despite his intelligence and a common programmed conscience aware of good and evil), which in mentally healthy people will “burn” when they do wrong – you think all that is probable along with the fine-tuning necessary for that to all be possible?:
I would also like to know from you: How likely is it that giant amphibious or fully aquatic dinosaurs have come to live in small bodies of water in the USA, far away from oceans? Jacque Cousteau knows at least one exists in Lake Tahoe. Or how is it that shrimp came to live in the middle of a desert, on a large rock structure, in Australia, extremely far any ocean? How about the fish of Death Valley, and note the word “death” in the name of that valley? How did a giant structure, broken in two, in the shape of Noah’s Ark, get on mount Ararat? “More improbable” for your random universe: why is the impression of the shape of the bottom of a ship doing at the foot of that mountain? How do you explain the many out of place artifacts in the world” (2)? Are they probable too in this billions of years old universe of your invention?
More popular is the other theory that the dark energy is apparent due to the cumulative effects of the light passing through many voids. That avoids the need for us to be in a center of a spherical void.
And why might it be more popular, TO PEOPLE LIKE YOU (NOT EVERYONE), who ignores the obvious all around you and takes it out of context in a world of people who hate God for not doing whatever they want him to do, like you? Can you make a correct guess, based on evidence, and not mere faith, so called “blind faith” by atheists and agnostics?
What a sad world atheists and pagans have made for themselves. What to choose, a life realizing how sad their lie is, and being hated for not pretending it’s truth, or joining the lie at the risk of ending up tortured and murdered by one of the liars? Who to trust, those who when they kill your body can do no more to you, or the one who can destroy both body and soul in Hell, while continuing their suffering forever and can also give eternal peace to those who trust in him? Temporary vs. eternal. What is the logical choice to make to survive, and live?
There clearly is a corrupting being that causes stupidity and evil among us, making us much worse than seems logical, and there clearly is a being that only does good and will not give in to evil, and restrains it.
Why God would isolate Earth from the rest of the universe, why he would make it difficult for the rest of his intelligent creatures to find us, why a loving being would not want to see Hell and death spread over billions of light years in all directions, why he would choose to limit sadness and pain? If he was a merciful, compassionate and loving God, it would be understandable. In conclusion, be thankful for what God has shown you, and turn to him, before it is too late, and you no longer see, smell, hear or touch his wonders.
It does not go against reason and learning to say, “In the beginning, God made the heavens and the earth,” and that God does what is wondrous in our eyes, but it does when you to try and explain everything away with “Say, ‘It was chance and evolution for why things are the way they are,’ because it’s money that matters, not truth, if you want many friends to have a comfortable life.”
God have mercy on you who hate God, because his hatred is much greater and just, and he is able to carry out anything he wills. And one day, his Son will return, both to save and to destroy.
Instead of resorting to mere insults and banning whatever you disagree with, moderators of PhysicsForums, how about be scientific and honest? How about showing the truth, instead of hiding it and accusing everyone else who disagrees with your attitude and feelings and opinions as being crackpots, trolls, making “noise” and having an attitude? If you resort to mere insults and banning along with it, doesn’t that show that you have an attitude that needs to be “canned”? Why are you above your own rules? Is that logical to attack and condemn others for/as being, doing and having those things when you yourselves make mere insults and have an “attitude”? How about you stop with the double standards, lies, and hypocrisy and encouraging immorality by claiming or implying that there is no absolute truth or morality? It is absolutely wrong to abuse and murder babies and children, why can’t you agree with that? Why does that deserve mere insults and banning? You’re not experts in religion, the Bible, God or Christianity, merely because you have some great amount of knowledge in math, biology, or physics, or are a moderator of PhysicsForums, that doesn’t make you God or my Judge does it? Promote true science and peace, not hatred with your evil attitude and cowardly anonymous attacks.
“…their ships were far superior to ours, both in size and technology – Boy, were they big!… and menacing! No, there is no question of a space station… – Neil Armstrong, NASA astronaut, one of the first humans on the moon in the modern age
post link: http://featherless.tk
Evolution Is TRUE!
Penguins Go Naked: The Sacred Penguin Prophecies
By Facebook the Expert Gypsy Studier
Mainstreamer scientists are “perplexed” according to CNN over the evolution of penguins which have lost their feathers in order to evolve into sun birds. The Mainstreamers fought with one another when some, lacking faith in god-man Darwin, attempted to cover up, actshually hide this proof of Mother Evolution and her Punctuated Equilibrium, aka Hopeful Monster children, which Goldschmidt the Great prophecied would happen in the past, over and over, which is how irreducibly super complex beautiful symmetrical creatures of all kinds turned suddenly turned into other animals without having to evolve. From CNN’s Blog:
A mysterious ailment is causing penguins to lose their feathers, according to researchers at the Wildlife Conservation Society.
The condition, called feather-loss disorder, has been seen in penguin chicks in both sides of the Atlantic Ocean the past few years and is featured in a recent edition of the journal “Waterbirds,” the release said.
While scientists don’t know what could cause a penguin to go “naked,” possible culprits include genetics, nutrient imbalances, thyroid disorders or pathogens.
“We need to conduct further study to determine the cause of the disorder and if this is in fact spreading to other penguin species,” Dee Boersma, who has studied Magellanic penguins, said in the release.
Feather loss in pet birds has long been a common ailment seen by pet stores and private owners, but researchers studying the penguins in the Atlantic said this is something different.
“The recent emergence of feather-loss disorder in wild bird populations suggests that the disorder is something new,” Mariana Varese, acting director of the society’s Latin America and Caribbean program, is quoted as saying in the release. “More study of this malady can help identify the root cause, which in turn will help illuminate possible solutions,” she said.
While the illness does not appear to be fatal, the sick birds, unlike their feathered counterparts, linger in the sun instead of seeking refuge from the midday heat. That behavior has led to several deaths, according to the release.
I theororize that Mainstreamers’ disrespect of Mother Gaya by refusing to admit Wicca as the truth and because of the fundistsmental Cristians, which are destroying Mother Gaya through aka Climate Disruption of our Mother Earth aka known as Climate Interference aka Weather Affection aka Hindering the Weather aka formerly known as Global Warming Syndrome also aka known The Coming Hot Ice Age, that’s all so far I think, well that all that is making it hotter so that the penguin peoples’ DNA has decided to evolve and become greedy by trying to warm themselves even more, out of greed for Father Sun’s heat rays, for his warmth. They can’t help but be greedy oh peoples of the world, including you other animals who are sisters and brothers and cousins and asexuals and hermaphrodites and LGBTs to the penguin peoples, so please don’t judge them for trying to take all the heat for themselves, it’s natural selection aka survival of the fittest. They’re just trying to be fit okay, Jesus said they don’t need our help that the birds will feed and clothe themselves, so please stop putting them in warm-suits aka hot and wet suits, leeeeeave theeeeem aloooooone, because that’s not what Mother Nature intended, it just interferes with the natural way of things, whether it be extinction or multiplication (did I spell that rite?), well at least I know how to spel “spell” ha.
Now please discuss the consequences of the illogic of Mainstream Scientists who won’t stay true to their faith, which Mother Nature aka Gaya is punishing them for, because she doesn’t want hypocrisy, people. THE ICE IS MELTING PEOPLE! MAKE IT STOOOOOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *stressing*
You know wat? This reminds me of the mutant sheep pig which is trying to look like a dog as adaption of the species, click here to see it, it’s so strange.
I heard the ”Pale Blue Dot” poem or speech from Carl the crazy, humanist, atheist, evolutionist, hypocrite Sagan on Alex Jones at about 3:30 AM today, more like night, and was angered and annoyed by what I heard. I broke his rant apart and refuted it.
Sagan: “From this distant vantage point, the Earth might not seem of any particular interest.”
That can be said of a lot of things from a far away distance, so what?
“But for us, it’s different.”
Is that profound, to say that humans are interested in what is around them? That’s something to say to very little kids, not any intelligent kid over eight years of age. Humans are also interested in their own bodies, and those of others, adding that would have given it more complexity at least.
“Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home.”
I look forward to my home in Heaven, and Earth after evil people like Sagan, and Satan are no longer polluting it and tempting others to be hateful like them, and after it’s been melted down and reformed into perfectly beautiful safe place.
“On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives.”
And those God loved continue to live in Heaven. (For you who are ignorant of Scripture, it says, “You are angry with the wicked every day,” and “You hate all who do wrong.”
“The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every “superstar,” every “supreme leader,” every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there – on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.”
WOW: AND I THOUGHT I MADE RUN ON SENTENCES. WOW. Besides nerdy and pretentious I couldn’t follow that and won’t. That turned this speech into a rant.
“The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena.”
That statement shows that Sagan had little to no conscience. It’s a stage for narcissists like you and sociopaths and psychopaths and the arrogant, who think or act like life is a game. Life is not a game or act. When little kids are physically and emotionally abused and cry in pain, scream out in pain and feel like committing suicide, hey are not acting, they are not putting on a show to entertain, nor are others of any age who are severely abused or in the process of being murdered.
“Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors, so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot.”
Yes: and atheist leaders like Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, and the Chinese atheist government and the atheism supporter Hitler and Roman Catholics Mussolini and Franco, who together, in less than 100 years, murdered over 300,000,000 people, and severely persecuted those who loved God. And the Chinese government still severely persecutes Christians who won’t conform to their atheist-approved version of Christianity, and there are still many atheist leaders and police in Russia and it’s former satellite states who persecute Christians, including Belarus, which right now is ruled by someone worse than Hitler (because unlike Hitler, this man has much easier access to information about God, and so knows better not to do what he is doing).
“Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner,”
So, the Anglo-Saxons look like Pygmies? Muscovites look like the Ashkens and Sephars of Israel? Many Israelites have a rough and crude appearance. Their aren’t many fine Israelis.
“how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.”
This rant had no point. It seems to be a more pretentious form of the logical fallacies: “War is bad/War is bad because people die (and it causes pain)” and “Arguing is bad (because it’s unpleasant)” which as far as I know never have what I put in brackets, and so are still pointless. Even saying, “because people die” is pointless, because why is death bad in all cases? On top of that anti-population expansion people want people to die, in huge numbers (which by the way shows that they could care less about technological progression, such as colonizing space, and are therefore boring and anti-scientific, and yet are often evolutionists and supporters of the Mainstream Science religion which is supposed to be about having fun learning and making money and helping others, technological progression, scientific progression and colonizing space, though many in that cult if not all are also against population expansion, which therefore shows that Mainstreamers and non-scientists which are against population expansion but who support Mainstreamers are a self-conflicted, confused (or forgetful) and hypocritical group.
Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.
How does Earth, which you pretentiously call a point of pale light, challenge “the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe” if Earth is not alive? And what makes it a delusion to think God gave us the privilege of seeing his creations, enjoying them, serving him and being one of the focuses of his attention and other things? Further, why did he “Universe”, rather than God or aliens? I sure don’t see any mention of Geocentrism in this rant in any way, so why did he just speak out against it? Was there something Carl the liar didn’t want the world to realize, but to keep a secret for the elitists he served?
“Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark.”
This liar was bribed by elitists to mislead people away from the fact that Earth is often visited by aliens (and he took the bribe), every day now, and that the U.S. government had possession of alien ships and bodies. In my last post I even have pictures of a UFO I saw a few days ago.
“In our obscurity,”
We’re not obscure if aliens are always coming here of many kinds, in ships that can travel to other planets with life that is alien to them, and when thousands of angels and demons know about us and fight against or protect us every day.
“in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.”
God’s word is everywhere, the book he wrote through mankind is the most popular, widespread, numerous, free and priced, most influential book in the world and has been translated into the more languages than any other book. And it clearly says God will save those he loves from those who hate Him and therefore them. Further, one time a saucer did help an army to get through a wall, so that is a hint that they might help SOME humans and save them, again, one day. And they be populating other parts of the universe with humans. There are many missing people that have never been found, and aliens are known to take blood samples and cattle parts, which they might be using for cloning and medicine.
“The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life.”
Liar. And that statement is pointless.
“There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit yes. Settle, not yet.”
We already have alien ships and probably ones based on their technology, and even if we don’t, the richest countries could easily colonize the Moon or Mars if they haven’t already, or make space stations near Europa and Titan and use the resources from them to live, and after doing those things, continuing to colonize the solar system, and from there, the rest of the galaxy, until the whole universe is filled with humans. The things which stop us from doing those things are people with anti-scientific and anti-truth beliefs and belief systems like and worse than Carl Sagan’s and evil behavior and speech in general, which Christians also do at times.If true Christians used their money for space colonization instead of evangelization, charity, and luxury goods, then they would be successful at it, so long as they didn’t totally forsake their main goals, and didn’t commit any atrocities which God would hold them responsible for as a group, and punish them for in such a way that it would stop them from space colonization.
“Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.”
What does it matter where location you “take a stand” against something is? And take a stand for what? Against people like you? Satan? And I thought he was against taking stands against people? Or did he expect those warring against each other to just tolerate child abuse, murder, stealing, lying, fraud, drunkenness, stalking, harassment and insane people always disturbing their peace or encouraging such things with illogical rants? Did he expect people to just get up and stand at a podium and speaker and complain, “Why can’t we all get a long?” as if merely asking with sadness would make everyone more logical and kinder or perfectly?
“It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character building experience.”
Who said this, and what does it matter? It was because Carl Sagan was a narcissist, and one who was an astronomer and so wanted everyone to think that he was a humble person (a good person) with a “character” (and what kind of character?). Typical sign of a narcissist: use some eloquent or big word in a way that is vague, and therefore makes no point, because narcissists are careless with logic and lazy when it comes to thinking and more interested in sounding smart for easy friends, money, please, praise, admiration, and so just put out catch words for those things.
“There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world.”
How is a distant image an example of Earth an example of “the folly of human conceits” Mr. “People Say That Astronomers Are Said to Be Humble and Have a Built Up Character?” Or were you talking about that conceited statement being that it was the last action you mentioned?
“To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we’ve ever known.”
Why does “a distant image of Earth being “the best demonstration of folly of human conceits” underscore to you that “we” (me and the millions of kind charitable Christians you hated, too full of hate and self-centered to bother to get to know?) need to “deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot”? Besides that not making sense: are you God that your desires should be followed over anyone else’s? And what do you mean by “kind” or “more” kind Mr. Morally Vague Astronomer With the Built Up Moral Character? Why should anyone do what you advise, even you had been specific by saying, “Don’t lie, don’t steal, don’t murder, don’t make images of or worship imaginary gods, love your neighbor as yourself, forgive your enemies, be kind to strangers, bless your enemies not just your friends, and by doing these things are doing, “Do to others as you would have them do to you” which is what you should do” ? If there is no God, then shouldn’t we take this advice, given by God:
“If the dead [will] not rise [(be resurrected)] at all? Why [would] people baptized on their behalf? Why are we [putting ourselves] in danger every hour [if they won't be brought back to life]? I protest, brothers, by my pride in you, which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, [for whom] I die every day! What do I gain, if, humanly speaking, I fought with beasts at Ephesus? If the dead [will] not rise, [then]: “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.” – 1 Corinthians 15:29-32
Most people are reckless like Carl Sagan, and for a bribe that he couldn’t take with him to the grave, to enjoy forever, and so was only temporary, would imprison everyone forever on a “lonely obscure pale blue dot filled with conceited people who hate each other and kill each other.” And how would such people preserve their home if that is what they are like, and don’t grow out of? If they are liars and bribe takers like Carl? Will they change because of a nonsensical pretentious poem, even by being a little kinder, whatever that means to anyone? How could they if nothing changes them according to astronomers and Mainstreamers like Carl? Why should anyone listen to him, especially if they know he was a liar and bribe taker and took a bribe to consign all humans except some illogical elitists like him, to an obscure death? And why would it be conceited if we are trapped on this obscure planet then, in which life alone may exist, to then try and be the center of attention, especially if it’s merely a stage with many viewers nearby and no where else, and when our lives are supposedly only going to be short and the only ones we will ever have, according to atheists, which Carl was?
It is obvious to me that Carl Sagan was a narcissist, from his past words, like his arrogant insult on the Jay Leno Show, which was that there is no “old man with a beard in the sky,”and this Pale Blue Dot speech, which is illogical.
Carl the Credit Theif
About an hour ago I discovered, that on February 19, 2011, bandpitdeviant made a post on Reddit in which he implied that on his own, Carl Sagan came up with a logical fallacy list, as did Sagan, in his book, “Demon Haunted World”. I pointed out in repeated replies that it was Christians who came up with those lists, and that even Darwin, whom Carl trusted in, had stolen credit from others by pretending to have come up with the theory of natural selection on his own, when Edward Blyth, a naturalist creationist was the one who mainly came up with it. Now besides pride being why the atheists of Reddit would be deleting my replies, meaning their pride was offended, it’s also obvious that they might be deleting them because that page bandpitdeviant made, shows how gullible atheists are, and prideful: at the time of me posting this, about 200 people voted bandpit’s post up, and because I kept replying to it (it was dying in popularity before I started replying to it again), and most likely, it was atheists doing so, because Reddit is an atheist-oriented website, which promotes atheism, and it can see from the replies, that atheists are the ones supporting the post and claim that Carl came up with the logic fallacy list.
Deliberate atheism is truly a denial of truth.
[Comments are closed to this article because no atheist has been able to come up with anything useful to say other than to show that atheists are careless readers, hypocrites, immoral and very irritating. There are plenty of comments to read here and on other articles though].