Home > Michio Kaku > What Does Michio Kaku Believe and Can He Be Believed?

What Does Michio Kaku Believe and Can He Be Believed?

Post link: http://michiokaku.tk

According to Michio Kaku, about 30% of scientists (polled since WWII) are religious and believe in God. He also believes that the Bible is scientific (Coast to Coast AM interview), good. Some quotes from him:

What was God thinking when the universe was created? That’s where we are going with this thing [the super collider]. … The universe… is quite beautiful… it could have been random… it could have been horrible… that’s what Einstein believed. 11:51-11:52 P.M., 1/29/2010, Coast to Coast A.M.. his reply to the host Art Bell

“God throws dice, what can I say?”- Michio Kaku, 12:41 P.M., 1/29/2010, Coast to Coast A.M.

When scientists use the word God, they usually mean the God of Order. For example, one of the most important revelations in Einstein’s early childhood took place when he read his first books on science. He immediately realized that most of what he had been taught about religion could not possibly be true. Throughout his career, however, he clung to the belief that a mysterious, divine Order existed in the universe. His life’s calling, he would say, was to ferret out his thoughts, to determine whether he had any choice in creating the universe. Einstein repeatedly referred to this God in his writings, fondly calling him “the Old Man.” When stumped with an intractable mathematical problem, he would often say, “God is subtle, but not malicious. – Hyperspace : A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the 10th Dimension, Page: 331

They [science and religion] can be in harmony, but only if rational people on both sides engage in honest debate. Einstein believed in two types of Gods, for example. He did not believe in a personal God, or a God of intervention. He did not believe that God answered our prayers. But he did believe that there was a God of Spinoza. This is the God of Harmony. He said we are like children entering a huge library for the first time, not knowing how to read the thousands of books that are beyond our understanding. Many scientists, therefore, might say that they believe in a God of harmony. For example, scientists believe in a Big Bang that started the universe. But then we have to ask what happened before the Big Bang (more on that later). Then we have to ask where the laws of physics came from. Personally, I think that the laws of physics are the only ones possible, that all other laws are mathematically inconsistent. Thus, God probably had no choice in creating the universe, as Einstein believed. – Kaku’s response in a chatroom to the user FifthDream, who asked him, “Dr. Kaku, what is your opinion on science and religion? Are the two in opposition or can there be harmony?”, 2003

To Michio: you’re always speaking behind Einstein when it comes to whether or not you believe in the God of the Bible or not, or a God who cares about his creation or ever intervenes or whether or not he predestined what will be. Please don’t do this, just say what you believe. Are you afraid of being wrong or ridiculed or discriminated against by the majority of so called “mainstream scientists”? People will ridicule you too, and probably have, for not speaking plainly. Though Jesus often spoke in riddles (and often only implied things) he gave explanations for much of what he said. And if he didn’t, other parts of the Bible usually explain, but where is the information to let us know what you believe about God? Talk about yourself for once, not Einstein, who’s Relativity Theory was wrong.

Update: 2/6/2011 10:20 AM:

Seeing that many people are still looking at this post since I posted it, I decided to watch an uploaded video on Youtube, a segment of a BBC documentary that a rude commenter had pointed out to me last year, but which out of resentment I ignored for a while. But I watched it a few minutes ago and transcribed the parts most relevant to this post:

Michio: “I imagine that eternal life was a powerful incentive for people who worshiped here (Well’s Cathedral). … The problem today though, is tIhat many of us is more skeptical. To get everlasting life in heaven, you have to trust that heaven actually exists. Speaking as a scientist, I think that there is a problem with regards to the afterlife and religious immortality, and that is there’s no proof that it exists. Remarkable claims require remarkable proof. But maybe, you don’t need proof. Well, I do.” – Micho Kaku, BBC Video: There Here After. “

Later in the video, Michio tours the Grand Canyon with some old male geologist who claimed that “they” (who?) said that it took the stream (the one that usually goes through the Grand Canyon) “5 million years” to carve it out. Michio, after leaving him then said as a wide screen shot of the canyon was being shown, “Unimaginable eons of time are needed for water to carve out valleys.”

How in the world did he miss that the Bible says a worldwide disaster occurred which included it being completely flooded? Not only that, why didn’t he mention floods at all???????? Don’t floods also carve out things and make rapid changes? Doesn’t a constant downpour of rain erode certain hills and mountains and cliffs which have countless times caused devastating mudslides? What a big oversight. Then I found from a video to the side of that one, on Youtube, what after transcribing, was an interview from a beautiful woman named Dr. Kiki:

Dr. Kiki: “…those big questions, theoretical physicists seem to come up those, throughout their entire careers”

Michio: “That’s why I became a theoretical physicist. I wanted to bump up against those big questions.”

Dr. Kiki: “…constantly.”

Michio: “…and so, I mean that’s another question I was really interested in, is that.

Dr. Kiki: “I’ve heard that the majority of, theoretical physicists, are, incredibly spiritual, and, have, a great appreciation for, the concept of consciousness and the soul and the universe and where it came from because these are the questions which they’re constantly, asking. Um, for yourself, how do you, how do you, what’s your view on, life, and, you know, where is it, what are you doing when you teleport. life, if we ever get to that point.”

Michio: “Uh well if I knew the answer to, to life I would have inside track up there (he laughs while motioning with his hand with a thumbs up to Heaven). Uh but let me tell you how we, we, we physicists view things, right. For example, um, Einstein was asked the big question, ‘Is there a God is there a meaning to everything?’ right?”

Dr. Kiki: “Right.”

Michio: “And here’s how Einstein answered the question: He said there really are two kinds of God’s, we have to be very scientific, we have to dih- define what you mean by, ‘God’. If God is the God of intervention, the personal God, the God of prayer, the God that parts the waters, then he had a hard time believing in that, would God listen to all our prayers for, a bicycle for Christmas, and, smite the Philistines for me please (points in front of him as if pointing to them). He didn’t think so, however he believed in the God of order, harmony, beauty, simplicity and elegance; the God of Spinoza. That’s the God that he believed in, because he thought the universe was so gorgeous. It didn’t have to be that way, it could have been chaotic, it could have been ugly, messy. But here we have the fact that all the equations of physics, can be placed on a simple sheet of paper.”

Dr. Kiki: “Right.”

Michio: “Einsteins equation is only, one inch long (makes a inch length with his index finger and thumb of his right hand).”

Dr. Kiki: “Mmmm hmmm.”

Michio: “And the quantum theory is about a yard long(,) but you can squeeze it, on, to, uh, a sheet of paper (the intervew and Michio laugh).”

Dr. Kiki: “Right(,) with a small enough font.”

Michio: “Right. And with string theory you can even put those equations together. And string theory can be, squeezed into an equation one inch long (makes the inch length with his right hand again).”

Dr. Kiki: “Hmm. (with an upward tone).”

Michio: “And that equation by the way is my equation (laughs a little and widens his eyes), that’s string field(?) theory.

Dr. Kiki: “Nice.”

Michio: “That’s my contribution.”

Dr. Kiki: “Right.”

Michio: “But we wanna know, well where did that equation come from, you know? This is what Einstein asked, uh, ‘Did God have a choiccce. Was there any choice in building a universe.’ When he woke up in the morning he would say(,) he would say, ‘I’mwanna create a universe(,) I’m gonna be God today. What kind of universe would I create.'” Then Michio quickly said, “This is how he (Einstein) created much of his theories.”

Note: The interview was casual, Michio was confident, barely nervous-sounding if at all, didn’t have perhaps but a hint of boastfulness which at most was when he credited himself with the invention of string field theory, and it was fast-paced.

After typing this up I looked to see when this interview had been made, and at http://www.twis.org/2010/05/14/462 found this comment (which seems to confirm that Michio said “field” where I put the question mark):

Gendou
Posted August 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM

Kaku, as usual, is being dishonest when he takes credit for contributing the equation for string field theory!

Light-cone string field theories were introduced by Stanley Mandelstam and developed by Mandelstam, Michael Green, John Schwarz and Lars Brink. An explicit description of the second-quantization of the light-cone string was given by Michio Kaku and Keiji Kikkawa. (From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_field_theory).

I didn’t find out when the Kiki interview was made, but the interview on Youtube which I transcribed, above, was uploaded in April, 2009.

Here’s a video on Youtube in which Michio Kaku says that those who are opposed to the NWO are terrorists.

Related articles:

More on Michio Kaku’s Character Creationism and String Field Theory Controversy

Who Invented String Theory?

Mainstream Science: A Polluted Crowded Stream of Quacks and Cracked Pots

About these ads
  1. Cody Peterson
    October 29, 2010 at 12:21 AM

    Trolling Back in here on your continued fascination with Michio Kaku. Obviously you want at least one credited scientist on your team, but I don’t think you will get it. (Also yeah the last post was a bit lengthy I don’t think I would have read the whole thing either but i wouldn’t say it is childish. You are the one who believes in the boogey man.) Listen if you, watch or listen to enough of his stuff, he obviously couldn’t care less about religion. I think he “hides”, as you call it, behind Einstein because he is one person who put away his feelings for science and reached across the table.

    Most Scientist have given up trying to work with religion. They dealt with it during the dark ages and were tortured for it and they are chastised if they come out and say GOD is probably not real.So i believe the majority of them are finished trying to help you people. If you really want to know what he thinks watch his stuff you will pick up on it quickly if you watch about a forth of his material. If you can read he has books too.

    PS god (yes I lower cased it) If he is indeed real, is a jealous sadistic dictating prejudice racist. The christian god that is, others are very much the same.

    There was once an indigenous man in South America when the Conquistadors came over who was tied to a post for a burning. The Missionary explained to him briefly as best he could about Hell, jesus, Heaven, etc.. the whole shebang. Then he asked the native, “Do you accept our god as yours.” (something around those lines). The native asked, “Are there other Christians in heaven.” The missionary answered, “Of course!!”. The native replied kindly, “I’d rather not”.

    Even if the story isn’t real, which I think it isn’t, It brings up a good point. Why would I want to live with the likes of crusading murderers, rapists, torturers, pedophiles, and racists. Doesn’t make sense to me.

    You can verify me, by my E-Mail, I will definitely be looking forward to your next post. Hey at least I’m reading it right.

    Also Einstein was Michio’s Role Model. That’s why he talks of him so often.

    • October 29, 2010 at 1:41 PM

      Trolling Back in here on your continued fascination with Michio Kaku.

      I’m not fascinated with him, the world is (and many false Christians I’m sure, who are apart of the world though many can also be considered apart of The Church, though are not permanent members in the long run), and so I wrote about him. Also because he is a spokesperson for the mainstream scientific group in general, and they accept him as such, and he makes himself a speaker for all scientists, as I pointed out, and LIES, and hides the truth, I expose clearly his errors, and correct and rebuke him as the Bible requires. I also find it personally upsetting for someone to speak for me when they are against my religion.

      Obviously you want at least one credited scientist on your team,

      Wow: I point out his error of speaking for all scientists (or was that not pointed out in this article) and I point out throughout my journal there are MANY Christian scientists and who are the originators of science (God was first) and who carried it out mainly, till atheists hijacked it and twisted it and make it appear as if there are no Christian ones now, and you repeat the offense, that ignorant claim, and a common sense ignorant claim: do seriously think all scientists are atheists or irreligious, and when such are a small percentage of the world, and when common sense would say they are not all scientists? According to you then there a tiny amount of scientists in the world and all are irreligious. That’s extreme ignorance and lack of common sense!

      but I don’t think you will get it.

      Did you not read what Michio said about the Bible which I quoted him as saying? I keyworded all my articles on him with his name, you shouldn’t have a hard time finding it. And you can go to my book store to the right Truthshop, and read the books on the history of science and Christianity, you are badly mistaken due to your lack of concern of the truth.

      (Also yeah the last post was a bit lengthy I don’t think I would have read the whole thing either but i wouldn’t say it is childish.

      What last post, yours? Wow so you think you are the only one who comments on what I write? Self-centered and arrogant much?

      You are the one who believes in the boogey man.)

      Because you said so and whatever you say is true. I’ve already pointed out you argue in ignorance, and you again made a mere claim. Read the article I posted on logical fallacies since you are illogical and remain stubborn and refuse to learn the truth. I finished with you because you are childish, and stooped low again with a childish low blow (if I said you were childish you must be since I carefully read the comments I get, unlike you) with the dumb boogey man comment, and the Bible says to avoid arguments of ignorance. If I haven’t told you already, glance at my homepage to this journal, look around it: how in the world, do you, a clearly lazy ignoramus, think you know and understand more than me on religion and atheism and how it relates to science?; You’re a massive idiot in comparison to me and make it very clear that you are, yet you are so arrogant, you refuse to see how obviously inflated you are. You don’t take pride in ignorance man, you take pride in knowing and understanding God, the source of truth and who is perfect, instead you take pride in your stupidity and feelings of feeling right! DUMB!

      You are wasting my time with your dumb, low blow, childish insults, and it is harassment when you do that. Again: The Bible says to avoid arguments of ignorance, and you are a massive ignorant. READ for once instead of being a skimmer and instant opionator. You’re opinions are worth less than a penny. The rest of your comments are ignored Mr. “I’ll Insult Him Again and Be So Arrogant as to Expect Him to Listen to Me Endlessly Regardless. You are arrogant and it ruins your ability to be logical. Now I will ignore you.

    • Chris S mitchell
      November 6, 2010 at 8:09 AM

      i think religious people are bitter because they can’t prove that the bible proves something like “their god is real” and is “the only true god” and all that fuss. most people really don’t give a $#!& or think it does anymore. because its very obvious there is simply NO PROOF. But scientists can prove anything they can measure and well, in the 21st cen. we can that “data” which is then used as evidence and often used to “prove” something.

      • November 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM

        “i think religious people are bitter because they can’t prove that the bible proves something like “their god is real””

        Emotard the Bible tells me to ignore arguments of ignorance, and you’re arguments are stupid child-babble which don’t prove anything but that you love swishing your emotion-based opinions around like a typical idiotic kid. Grow up and stop babbling and might wanna actually notice the evidence all throughout this journal let alone the entire Internet and the universe for God. Stop babbling and start reading more than pop mainsteam big bang and evolution babble and watching Discovery Channel cartoons. Hint Chris: “Proof” doesn’t mean “evidence”, which reminds me: use a dictionary and memorize the meanings of the words you use most often and when you argue, because you’re using the words wrong. Since you’re lazy, I’ll give you help: proof is evidence that personally convinces you, so when you say “such and such hasn’t been proved” you’re ignoring THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IT HAS BEEN PROVED TO. You’re so self-centered, as I said to you before, the utter, utter obvious is invisible to you. Pay attention to what is going on around you carefully, not with bias and the desire to just blurt out whatever seems to be true to you at the time. Have some patience and study.

        “and is “the only true god” and all that fuss.”

        Yeah, whatever.

        “most people really don’t give a $#!& or think it does anymore.”

        Because you said so Chris, and whatever Chris babbles is true is true because it came from Chris, whose feelings make him right. Yeah.

        “because its very obvious there is simply NO PROOF.”

        Obvious because Chris said, “simply” and “very obvious” and capitalized “no proof”. Gotta love Chris’ “science” and “evidence” and “proof”, not. Gotta love Chris’ clear vision of the obvious, which is so clear he misses the obvious that not everyone is a Christian and that many non traditional religions and non-religious life styles exist because Christians aren’t trying to control everyone and because God doesn’t do whatever he desires… <— (magic dramatic dots which make me right and Chris' magic dots wrong) oh but wait you just said, "most people really don’t give a $#!& or think it does anymore.“. Contradict yourself in your mindless “say-whatever-I-feel-at-the-moment” ranting?

        So most people don’t care about God anymore yet Christians control everyone, no wait they are trying to, uh, which is it insane babbler who cooool, “lols at ur world news hee hee hee, and my mockery makes ur journal silly cuz I mocked it heee hee”? Grow up snide, bitter infant.

        “But scientists can prove anything”

        Emotard scientists include Christians you insulting, stereotyping, truth-careless, ignoramus who is blind to the simply very obvious. See why the Bible says to ignore arguments of ignorance? What else endless stupid ignorant things you say should I reply to Chris, or should I ignore you now?

        “they can measure and well, in the 21st cen. we can that “data” which is then used as evidence and often used to “prove” something.”

        Chris, go to an English teacher and ask her to correct that grammatically nonsensical statement. And please don’t drink alcohol when you comment. And Chris, I don’t need you to tell me that evidence is used to prove things Mr. 1+1=2 You Should Know You Christians. And Mr. Well, Me Is Smart Chris and U R Dumb Christian Guy, would could analyze data before the 21st century, including Christians, and use that as evidence to prove something, just as we Christians do today, and just as non-Christians did i the past. Analyzing data and finding evidence in it to prove something and using it to prove something isn’t something knew, smug babbling moron. So Chris, in conclusion, stop being smug, arrogant, snide, and conniving, and babbling whatever you feel like babbling, and pay attention to the very simply obvious reality. Be humble and patient and listen to others instead of regurgitating baby-babble in your to no end and thinking the world wants to hear your silly talk after they are older than 17.

    • Addi
      October 10, 2011 at 10:46 PM

      I have to say that is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Not all Christians are good and not all atheists are bad. (The rest of this idiot’s rant has been deleted, for not bothering to read what he called “the dumbest” and rather coming here instead to opinionate as if his opinions were facts, “juz cuz.”)

      • October 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM

        “I have to say that is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Not all Christians are good and not all atheists are bad.” You’re probably one of the dumbest people alive because I never said all Christians were good: Did you notice, idiot, the right side of this page where TWICE ON TOP IT SAYS: THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CHRISTIANS AND WHY THEY MATTER. Further idiot, this is about Michio Kaku, not whether or not Christians or atheists are bad you five year old. Open your eyes and get a clue already mocking Opinionator. As for all atheists being bad: they are moron, they aren’t NOT all bad because you said so saying, “Oh this is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read.” You’re obviously a religion-ignorant and who knows nothing about Christianity or the BIble, and yet you go swinging your opinion at me as if the perspective of the other person, having no clue as to where it’s coming from, doesn’t matter. That’s all I read of what you said since it shows clearly you’re an ignorant arguing in ignorance. Learn what Christianity is about and the Bible, go to Sunday School 101-109 and learn what REFORMED Christians aka Calvinists believe or rather what God believes before babbling and playing judge over Christians. And fool: how is pointing out what Michio said dumb you time wasting idiot and when you and everyone else keeps coming here to find out? You are the idiot, not me. Stop lying and stop being fault-finding oaf. Learn right from wrong already (hint: it’s not based on your emo-liberal feelings). God bless you.

      • Jim Bart
        November 30, 2011 at 12:30 AM

        Btw, on the subject of Stephen Hawking concluding there is no God, Michio Kaku says he disagrees with Hawking and thinks concluding there is no God is to limit science itself. When Kaku says he needs proof, he’s saying this from a scientific principle and God says he can be “proved” and that we should question Him and he will be “proven”. I like how Kaku speaks to anyone who truly listens.

    • Jim Bart
      November 30, 2011 at 12:13 AM

      I’m interested in your reasoning and thought I would shed another perspective. I cannot offer you proof or enough of a perspective to change your mind (it would be extremely long), but perhaps I can suggest that you search things out with a different mind-set at the onset of your quest. i.e., research things by first assuming God was the big Electron and was actually a good Guy. You know, use the scientific principle of assuming something is true until actually proven otherwise.

      I, personally, have found two things to be true and in direct opposition to those who claim God is some type of Tyrant or even think He doesn’t exist. (My findings don’t make it true; it’s just my personal observation as a scientist. 1.) If you research the entire spectrum of Christianity and of Jesus Christ, Himself (rather than just one facet colored in a negative haze), with an open and scientific mind (by scientific I mean “questioning”), you will actually see that Christianity is not the depressing, hypocritical, self-righteous “religion” that those who oppose it, claim it is. It’s funny how (even some Christians) try to present the God of the Old Testament as some fire-breathing dragon who only smote the bad and praised the perfect. However, if you read the Bible through and read many, many historical texts, you can see that man sometimes puts a negative slant on God because of his own sinful nature. (i.e., Man can only see God through a human vantage-point and assumes “the Guy must be like me… it would piss me off if this person did this to me”.) But, God is really loving, compassionate and wants the best for EVERYONE. He’s not some hell-fire throwing god of vengeance. (We know this because we, as humans, have watched ourselves learn to have the same compassion and love and lack of vengeance as we seek God. I mean that the scientific principle of actually becoming Holy can actually happen because we see that it does as people practice God’s principles. Not that I’m saying we will ever attain holiness in this life, though I believe I have witnessed maybe a few that have.) The Guy has really gotten a bad rap based on a few misunderstood things. 2.) I and most scientists, I have found, actually believe in a God because without it, Math and Science just do not work. For most scientists or doctors, not to believe, requires “the willing suspension of disbelief” (as Hillary Clinton coined…not that I’m a Hillary fan, but I liked the phrase) and indeed, not only disbelief, but of completely ignoring scientific and physical principals by which we base all of our modern technology and engineering.

      I find it very cool that God proves himself to be the Creator of Science. I also find that Michio Kaku rises above the idle chatter and gossip of religion. (I also want the blog owner to take note of this part….just because I did not intend this to be a response to your post only and the owner’s question is about Kaku’s faith.) Christianity is not really a religion, but a way of life. Man in his quest for power has tried to turn it into a religion so he could use it for monetary and political gain (just as Christ said the Pharisees and Saducees did), but that’s the bad side of Man which does that. Thus, my conclusion is that Michio Kaku is not only a man of faith, but seems to be a Christian in the truest sense. God says that we would know other true Christians by the fruit that they bear (the scientific method of “proof” based on repeated observation) and I think Kaku bears pretty good fruit of the spirit – patience, kindness, gentleness, etc. He’s a very well-rounded dude… but that’s just my opinion. :)

      • November 30, 2011 at 12:34 AM

        I wonder how many mainstream scientists recognize the scientific method being used when Gideon tested to see if God was really talking to him.

  2. Chris S mitchell
    November 6, 2010 at 7:49 AM

    lol @ worldwide news..

    • November 6, 2010 at 12:30 PM

      lol @ Chris S mitchel whom I showed to be an infantile, babbling moron eager for what has already been all around him for thousands of years and which he participates in and yet still sees the scary All-Power Christian Group Boogie Monster That Controls Everything, Yet Magically Chis Has Escaped Enough To Babble Useless Comments and Stupid Insults.

      And moron, why are you laughing… <— oh look I made three dots, oooo the emotional drama must make me right in my insult against you then right Chris the emotard spaz? How is this journal not world news if it contains news throughout the world and the world goes to read it, or did you not notice the visitor map you idiot? And who comes to listen to you idiot? No one idiot. Fail.

  3. jjj
    November 27, 2010 at 8:17 PM

    Knight don’t get too worked up over atheist, most people can see past their hypocrisy.

  4. June 13, 2011 at 1:08 PM

    Well…Kaku was raised Buddhist by his parents. Although he did go to church as a child as well, I don’t really think he is Christian. I think that Kaku, if he must believe in a God, it must be the Universe, which is the beginning of our current time and space. A lot of scientists don’t hold to dogmatic religion, but they believe in their own forms of God that fit together with the science that they study. Many don’t believe in “God” as we are taught to define “him”. However, they could believe in “God” as in an immanent force, not an intelligent being, such as maybe the laws and forces of gravity, for example. Also, when people say “so and so percentage of scientists are religious” first off, where did you get those statistics? We must make sure that that has come from an actual survey or poll of authorized and credible scientists across the entire world. Sight sources. Secondly, if it is true, define “religous”. Oftentimes, people can believe in a certain kind of God or Gods WITHOUT being “religious”. We need to remember this. Also, are we talking Muslims, Hindus and Pagans, or Christians, Jews and Zaroastrinists? What kind of “religious” are we talking about? Usually people who talk about statistics like this are either Christian or Muslim. What would you say to a Pagan/Wiccan scientist? Would you include them in your statistics? If so, your argument doesn’t hold any water. Also, whether a scientist is “religious” or not should be the least of anyone’s concerns. Who cares. That doesn’t mean anything at all. I enjoy their discovers, whether they believe in a God, are religious, or not.

    ~Fruitikay

  5. Podunk Feezebottom
    September 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM

    These were great quotes, thanks for posting them.

  6. Microlesche
    December 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM

    lol. nice caps-locked comments. makes you look soo convincing.

    • December 4, 2011 at 1:54 AM

      And doting on caps locks in one comment to a sociopath like yourself makes you look so convincing? So my quotes of Michio are false because I justly emphasize what I say to a silly moron like yourself? And do you also lol and say nice caps to atheists and anti-Christians when they yell and say nonsensical things or boast arrogantly as proof of how right they are? Do those types of “caps” get your notice and mockery? No: because you’re an arbitrary, blind, hypocrite and a bigot.

      Stop being a fault-finding air head and learn something other than mocking for once you childish parrot.

  7. latter-days
    January 4, 2012 at 7:35 PM

    Why is it so hard to belive in a God, In the old testment times it took to witness to prove some one of a crime, or any thing else. I belive if we open are minds and look at the whole picture we can use the bible as who created the universe and then use science as how he created the universe. If we think like this we can understand the universe with more ease.

    • January 4, 2012 at 11:39 PM

      It’s hard to believe for various people because of their bitterness of not getting their way, because of being raised in ignorance, because of bias, because of temptation which can lead to delusion to justify giving in to that temptation, because of being raised to be believe they are good rather than than taught they are not good after a short while after having been born as the Bible says and because Satan causes them to forget and manipulates their minds and emotions. As for how God created the universe, there’s no evidence we can find out how God did that, and there’s no reason to try. We can’t even figure out how to get rid of scars yet.

  8. reidar
    January 25, 2012 at 12:46 PM

    You are incorrect, please stop saying intelligent people like michio kaku believe in a personal god.

    “Dr. Michio Kaku stated on his show “Time” that he does not believe in god. Einstein originally used the term “God” as a metaphor for the laws of physics. Physicists continue to use the metaphor as sort of a tip of the hat to Einstein.”

    • January 25, 2012 at 8:07 PM

      Turd brain atheist: you are incorrect because you did not bother to carefully read the article moron: no one said he believed in God idiot. Please learn to read with patience and to stop assuming you idiot. Perhaps you have narcissism disorder? You can read more about that mental illness here.

  9. Religious
    March 15, 2012 at 4:13 AM

    Human beings so far has explained very little about how the universe works even this explanation is far from complete and yet some people claim things they do not really have knowledge of including Stephen Hawking , Weinberg and others .Even If M theory ( Which we know nothing about and whose various limits describe an extremely amazing and unimaginable universe) is true . No one can claim that it describes the whole of creation. And most scientists working in the field do not agree with hawking.

    • March 15, 2012 at 6:08 AM

      “most scientists working in the field do not agree with hawking.” do you have evidence for this

    • Sean
      March 4, 2013 at 8:44 PM

      True, human being are far from explain the whole universe. But at least what science explained so far are testable and have consistent result. But why could a religious person claim things about the god or our universe, do they “really have knowledge of” the universe or the god? For god’s sake, why do people even insists on whether there is or isn’t a god?

      quote one of knight’s earlier reply:
      “As for how God created the universe, there’s no evidence we can find out how God did that, and there’s no reason to try. We can’t even figure out how to get rid of scars yet.”

      sure, there’s no evidence we can find out how God did that, there’s also no evidence we couldn’t. We have so little knowledge about the universe, and even lesser information about the god or even the existence of the god. why start claiming something we have so little knowledge of? wouldn’t it be more reasonable if we just work with what we have now, such as proved and applied science. And then making theory base on them, test and expand. Until we reach the point where we have include god into our knowledge, there’s no reason to concern our selves with something we don’t know nor should we make decisions based on god.

      And knight, if you are reading this, please define god for me.

      • March 5, 2013 at 6:27 PM

        “But at least what science explained so far are testable and have consistent result” no you gullible idiot science isn’t simply “whatever” you believe it to be or some evolutionist or Michio Kaku. YOU and evolutionists do not OWN scientists you idiot, and you can’t TEST EVOLUTION OR THE BIG BANG OR ABIOGENESIS. You’re an idiot, you are stupid and it’s obvious you are because you hate God and don’t give him the credit he deserves. Get lost.

      • Sean
        March 5, 2013 at 7:20 PM

        We can’t have a mature conversation if you just storm in and call everyone idiots(even some of those whose one your side).

        when i refer to “science”and “test”, i mean newton’s law, thermodynamic, engine, car, and the very computer you are using right now. But if you want to bring in evolution, fine.

        Evolution is just a theory, and are not complete. “you can’t TEST EVOLUTION” as a whole, but its fragment was TEST and had consistent result.put a bacteria of different species together, the fittest will win out over time. change the environment, the specie that adjust and fit most with the environment will grow more population then those that does not. with fragment like this and geography, chemistry we can find fragments of past environments. and then
        “making theory base on them, test and expand. ” and propose the evolution theory. It is not perfect, but there are testable evidence that supports it, with more evidence to be discovered, the theory can be constantly modified.

        But how can you test creationism? rely solely on bible? yeah, turn to page xxx, “there will be light”, turn to page xxy, “because god said so”

        “science isn’t simply “whatever” you believe it to be”
        you are talking about the absolute truth, and science is not absolute truth. like everything else, science do make mistake, and that’s why it is constantly changing, improving and fixing those mistake.

        but religion? the bible is always right, whatever the god say is right, whatever the people who “recorded” it on the bible never makes mistake and even those who translated the bible is absolutely right. all those people never make a single mistake, they all understand god even his metaphors perfectly, in every language bible is translated to. What are the odds of that? when bible makes a mistake, who fix it? will any Christian accepts the correction?

        and Science is EXACTLY whatever scientist believe it to be. Because Science is not truth, instead it is ideas that are trying to mod the truth. And science, the ideas, are defined by scientist. they could be wrong about the truth, but they could not be wrong about what idea they have. the difference between science and religion is, scientist believe in ideas because there are evidence to support it, because the idea is most likely to be true. but religion require your “faith”, require you to believe in ideas without asking for evidence and proof.

        scientist will ask the question
        what is faith? or god?
        But religion forbidden you to ask and think, because you are suppose to have “faith”, and to accept what they tell you.

  10. July 30, 2012 at 3:26 PM

    Sorry if I sound a bit rude.

    “Ignore arguments of ignorance” is one of your famous quotes, as seen in most of your comments here, dear author. However, I know how you feel when you think someone insults your religious beliefs, but talking in the context of the Christ I’m sure he did not yell or argued when some Jewish priests in Nazareth called him a heretic to their religion. Jesus was compassionate enough to take on insults and beatings without retaliating violently. He is verily the role model for all Christians, or anyone who admires him without having to be baptized.

    But I have to disagree with you when you say your commentators are bringing up ignorant arguments. Basically their beliefs are based on scientific findings; yours is based on the Gospel, so ultimately both of you are commenting from different worlds altogether. It’s like a world before Whites met any African and vice versa; the Whites would say that human beings in the whole world are Whites, and the Africans says that human beings in the whole world is black, and anyone caught having different claims are heretics. Then, suddenly a black man appeared in the White village, and a white man appeared in the African village: both villages got a shock of their lives! New discoveries changes perception and mentality, thus it is called science, or anything similar to it.

    Maybe you should try taking another approach in discussing science and religion, and having compassion is the ultimate way into hearing both sides. I would say that although your commentators are rude in attacking some sides of your personal beliefs, but that was because you were trying to convince everyone that Dr. Michio Kaku is a believer who hides behind Albert Einstein as if he would be persecuted if he tells everyone he is so. In my personal opinion however, Dr. Michio Kaku is more of an agnostic like all other scientist. He can’t just rely solely on faith to justify his beliefs, he needed science to prove so that he could have faith. He is basically just being neutral and unbiased, so that the viewers of his videos can have their own approaches on what they should believe. As a thinker he does not give absolute answers, he provokes the minds of others to seek out their own.

    Mahatma Gandhi once said: “I like your Christ, but I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ”. Not intended for mockery reasons, but if you’d think deeper you’ll get what Mr. Gandhi meant.

    • July 30, 2012 at 6:08 PM

      ““Ignore arguments of ignorance” is one of your famous quotes, as seen in most of your comments here” you quoted me wrong and it’s a quote from the Bible, I always say, “The Bible says” with that saying. So wow, right away you’ve messed up, and why?

      “I’m sure he did not yell or argued when some Jewish priests in Nazareth” Who said I was yelling? Third, WRONG. An ignorant comment because you assumed rather than read the Bible which is easy since you could have just used a search engine! That is why the Bible says to ignore arguments of ignorance. It’s a waste of time and starts more arguments and is a waste of energy. Study the Bible better than you study the Quran. My journal has many commentaries about the Bible.

  11. Garbonzo
    January 18, 2013 at 7:02 PM

    A worldwide flood could not have been possible for a number of reasons. Even if it did happen, it would wipe out all life on Earth. It didn’t happen.

    Most people who think logically think the flood was a local one, such as like in the movie Evan Almighty. [Ray originally made a break here] Therefore your flood theory is futile. A worldwide flood did not shape the grand canyon (or we would see more canyons like the grand canyon, as every river in existence at the time of the global flood would be a grand canyon according to you, even then it would take eons for all the water to disappear from the canyons, your hypothesis is nuts).

    [Crossed out by Knight for being a stupid rant].

    • January 19, 2013 at 12:45 AM

      Lol. I approved your comment because it shows how ignorant and stupid people like you are who don’t believe it. Look everyone how stupid this statement is:

      A worldwide flood could not have been possible for a number of reasons.” Now what’s Ray’s next response? Is it to give us an obvious not-debatable reason that completely makes the Flood story a clear impossibility as can be done with the Big magical life making Bomb from billions and billions of years ago or magical Darwinian evolution or the magic Frankenstein soup?, no, instead he then says:

      “Even if it did happen, it would wipe out all life on Earth.”

      So this person Ray is so stupid and ignorant that he doesn’t know

      1) basic biology, doesn’t have basic knowledge about SEEDS (WOW, seriously? A GUY WHO DOESN’T KNOW A THING ABOUT SEEDS IS ARGUING LIKE HE’S RATIONAL AND KNOWLEDGEABLE AND WORTH HEARING?!), or about sea plants or

      2) THE FLOOD STORY HE’S ARGUING AGAINST, THEREFORE ARGUING IN IGNORANCE LIKE A TYPICAL ATHEIST AND IMMATURE PERSON AND DOESN’T KNOW ABOUT A THING CALLED “THE ARK” (WOW, CAN WE SAY, “EXTREME IGNORANCE AND FOOLISHNESS”?).

      Then what’s Ray’s next statement, is it finally a piece of irrefutable evidence to back up his stupid arguments of ignorance which the Bible says to ignore (can you guess why it says to ignore such arguments?)? No, it’s:

      “It didn’t happen.”

      So, Ray is part of the Word of Faith movement! Name it and claim it! If you say it’s true or say, “Go away problem” it is instantly gone or with a few more repetitions it is. Or if you say, “It’s not true there’s a Satan who is blinding me and making me forgetful of obvious things, I can see clearly and I remember everything,” poof, Satan disappears and is gone and never existed and you’re perfectly logical.

      That’s a massive flood of stupidity of the kind that leads to mass murder as has been committed by atheist tyrants in these modern times. Praise God for the evidence that atheism leads to extreme stupidity, extreme poverty, extreme greed, extreme self-centeredness to the point of ignoring the obvious around you, misery, confusion, and death, all the opposite of “progress” and a hindrance to science that so many atheists claim to love and further.

      Ray, I didn’t read the rest of your rant, because God gave the good command to, “Ignore arguments of ignorance.” I’m not wasting anymore time on you and any comment you make that I think is from you will not be approved or unapproved.

  12. December 3, 2013 at 5:34 AM

    Michio Kaku is selling books. He, just like Neil deGrasse Tyson, is not willing to loose potential readers just by stating his disbelieve. The vast majority of scientist will not even discuss the subject of god, wich they consider irrelevant.

    • December 3, 2013 at 4:08 PM

      Oh yeah, forgot he wrote books. It seems though if he said he were an atheist he’d get more grant money and be more considered a solid reliable skeptic by the skeptics and mainstreamers who would then let him do more shows. But I think he has enough money in his mind, and just doesn’t want to deal with “spam” from Christians emailing him or walking up to him preaching why atheism is wrong etc. He’s either heard that is done to atheists, has seen it happen, or realizes it will if just says he doesn’t believe, so it might not be simple “pandering” to all sides for their approval like I first thought. But narcissists do love positive attention if they can get it, and he doesn’t seem like the type that wants negative attention, so I imagine his silence is for a kind of approval from Christians okay with being an agnostic and to at least not be ignored by the majority who may then think he’s a lost cause or just give him a few prayers and then a “goodbye”.

  13. Xeo
    January 15, 2014 at 3:06 PM

    knight :
    Turd brain atheist: you are incorrect because you did not bother to carefully read the article moron: no one said he believed in God idiot. Please learn to read with patience and to stop assuming you idiot. Perhaps you have narcissism disorder? You can read more about that mental illness here.

    That’s typical christian way to speak! And they tell us about love of Christ! Ha-ha! …”he believed in God idiot”… or idiot God?

    • January 17, 2014 at 10:09 AM

      “An unjust man is an abomination to the righteous; And he that is upright in The Way is an abomination to the wicked.” – Proverbs 29:27

      Bye mocker criminal who hates the righteous. All your ranting will never excuse your sins, all your, “But God, he stole from the cookie jar too, don’t send me to Hell, hate him and send him with me too” won’t save you angry hypocrite child.

      Get that log out of your eye like Jesus said Mr. Maybe This Maybe That HAHAHA. Disgusting.

      Maybe you’re a turd brain too.

  14. March 2, 2014 at 10:50 AM

    Faith is so simple that it eludes us all if we do not come to God like a Child. The complexity of creation itself and the odds against evolution are the proof that you look for. Bible Prophecy proves the Claims of the Creator THAT Creator is Jesus Christ! Explained in The Gospel of John. The Word made everything and The Word became flesh … i.e. Jesus, then the Bible proves that Jesus is God by the sheer overwhelming evidence of things that He accomplished, in such a short time span. Three Years!

    http://dayofpentecost.blogspot.com/2014/02/quick-bible-prophecy-verses.html

    Bible Prophecy begins by asking Jesus Christ to open your eyes and to come and have a discussion with about creation.

    The whole theme of the bible is the Messiah and how He will come through Abram’s seed who we now call Israel.

    The Gospel of John was written in such a way so that even a child can understand it.

    In the beginning was the Word … the Word became a man … this man fulfilled all of the prophecies about himself to the letter. The Odds of Probability say He is God.

    I hope you find the Prince of Peace Mr. KaKu … The world is on its last legs … everyone can clearly see that science cannot change anything Men are not fit to Govern .. Without God things look pretty hopeless … Bill

    • March 2, 2014 at 2:36 PM

      It’s clear to those who’ve studied Michio, that he has NPD, it’s a permanent corrupt mental disorder that can’t be cured, he won’t be standing before God in Heaven, ever.

  15. October 21, 2010 at 2:34 PM

    To Cody Peterson who commented on this article with his first sentence: “You are an idiot. Scientists don’t have to believe in god or not.”

    You’re an idiot: God said that fools don’t believe in him, and that he must be obeyed. You’re not God you idiot who thinks your mere insults makes you right. Stop trying to take his place you idiot, and stop trying to be mine you moron. The rest of your childish rant goes unread, since my time is valuable unlike yours, you lover of stupidity and hate.

  16. November 6, 2010 at 12:26 PM

    “dude. its kinda funny how “religion” is always tied to the “end” of every great human civilization on earth.”

    Why is funny? And do you find it funny how every great civilization ties religion in with science also, and how in Judges Gideon performs the scientific method, and that Christians and Catholics were the ones who started up science again before the Renaissance? How many ancient atheist scientists can you name, and do you find it funny you can’t come up with more than maybe one or two?

    Do you also find it funnny when the Discovery Channel or PBS makes “science” shows about what the end of the universe will be like, or how Earth might be destroyed? You’re blind and biased and ignorant of history and even modern times.

    “when i hear people say the word “christian” all i think of is any other groupe of people whom make their own purpose to get money or control people.”

    Evidence of your ignorance, because that’s all you can think of, despite countless evidences to the contrary. So moron you think Christian kids and elderly people are trying to control people with they send off their money to Haiti and other poor countries and give away food and plant seeds so that they can be independent and with the hopes of them starting their own independent church in their own language? So that’s trying control, you insulting babbler? Oh but wait, it’s a conspiracy of the middle-aged Christians then right: they want to control you’re mind and make you think about the end of the world all the time, oops: Apparently you forgot why you don’t want to go to church, to sing and praise God, damn that evil singing and praising. And it’s a conspiracy when they also donate and sit at church waiting for people to come and take their donations, or when they go out to feed the homeless or stand in soup kitchens, right? You’re a negative fault-finder, and that is why you don’t want to be with other Christians, because despite what you mouth and fingers say, you hate being around positive people who encourage people and tell them to be positive, rather than like you, being negative and hating the control of God. What the truth is, is that you hate God, and therefore hate authority, and hate the thought of obeying him, which you vaguely call “control” in your sloppy thinking, and in your stupidity, bash the Christians as the ones trying to control you, like a king attacking a messenger who brings him news, and blaming the messenger for the news. And it’s “group” not “groupe” wise Chris.

    “i respect the idea god exsists but i don’t let that idea own me.”

    Who cares? And can you speak plainly and not in a way that can’t be understood? How can believing in God own you? You either do or don’t, you don’t “really believe in God so much that it owns me” whatever the Hell that means. That’s baby talk.

    “i think we live in a time where the bible can be used for its moralilty not evidence of god.”

    You’re ignorant of the basic argument against morality without God, here it is again: If there is no God, no universal center of truth, then there is no reason that I should go with your morals anymore then you should go with mine, everything is relative and subjective when it comes to right and wrong, and that makes no sense in reality and it contradicts itself. A thing is either good or bad or neither at all. It is either good, bad or neither to make a child feel pain who has not inflicted pain on you or not intentionally. But you admit there should be morality and not a view of “no right or wrong” or “no God no guilt.” Is that really the world you want to live in, a world where right and wrong is “whatever” or enforced by vote? So you have no problem with people voting in rape as right? And what if the minority doesn’t want to accept it as right, are they immoral for not going along with the majority vote? Do you see?: You’re way is chaos, and you even admit the Bible is good for it’s GOODNESS, which you refer to merely as morality. But if it is good for it’s GOODNESS, then how can you make it out to be a book that lies about God existing? So you contradicted yourself! You are arbitrarily trying to cut out God out of your hatred for not wanting to be under his control, which like it or not “Chris”, are always under! It’s not Christians trying to control you, GOD ALREADY IS! You’re blind to the obvious and confused. You turn good into evil and evil into good and call the Bible good, but for no logical reason want the one who gave the goodness out of the picture that he himself made. And Chris, why would I care if you think the Bible can simply be used for morality and not evidence for God? Why should I care if that is what you think, or want to happen? Why should I care about your personal feelings and will Chris, over evidence that you are too smug, lazy and willfully ignorant to look for? If the Bible is used as evidence, and logically so, why would I listen to you saying, “I think you shouldn’t in these days”. And you think that cuz, Chris? Just cuz huh? Just cuz u don’t want to see traditional religion, cuz, cuz you’re Chris, who is God, and God is a God who just does “stuff”. You’re thinking is infantile.

    “i can’t wait until humans are kinda free from traditional religion.”

    You mean God isn’t letting the world try out an endless amount of religions? You mean everyone has been a Calvinist Christian for the past 6,500 years? What?! Chris, blind to the utter, utter obvious much? Did you just get out of cave? You don’t notice the world trying out any and every type of way? So God isn’t letting you? In your hatred of God you don’t notice the massive amount of freedom he’s given us, let alone for the past 6,500 years. THE OTHER WAY IS TO LIE CHRIS, REMEMBER? TO LIE, WHAT SATAN DID, and look where it got us Chris, endless fighting and confusion over anything and everything.

    “maybe then we can get off this rock when we need to.”

    And maybe God doesn’t let “us” off because we don’t need to get off of it in order to know what is most important in life, what is right from wrong, and who he is and why the universe exists. And maybe “we” already get off this rock, but you don’t pay attention to the news or eye witness accounts of United States ships going into space, let alone the pathetic ones from atheists and false Christians at NASA, which is a front to fool people into thinking the U.S. doesn’t have advanced space flight technology more than what NASA can come up with.

    And who said God doesn’t let anyone off, so no one ever makes it to Heaven? I get the impression that you are a teen from what you’ve said so far, or a deeply self-centered deist who is hardly familiar with traditional Deism.

    How can you think everyone is a Christian and that no one disobeys the Bible or any other religion? So you never heard of atheists or agnostics who do what they want, or just obey the laws of their country unless they know they can get away with it? You think that that is traditional religion? And did you now that the humanistic atheist movement is a new thing? There weren’t a massive amount of humanistic atheists like there are today in Galileo’s time. You need to study the history of Christianity and the humanistic atheist movement, science and study philosophy and logic, if you want to be wise in reality from fiction.

  17. June 24, 2011 at 9:52 AM

    To the moron known as “There’s No Josh Grimes” who left me many rants of which I only read one sentence:

    “And “knight”… You are officially the world’s worst writer.” And moron, you spent less than ten seconds reading the signs of a narcissist and expect me to believe a nobody with an attention span that short who hardly read anything I said can give an “official” anything on my writing? Grow up you idiot and learn the signs of a narcissist. Hint: giving official awards for world’s worst writer after spending less than 10 seconds reading about your mental disorder is a pretty good sign. And moron: court justices read that page and I always get hits from universities and major corporations every two days.

    Next time don’t assume when you don’t bother to read, and when your first sentence that shows up is what I repasted for you, don’t expect anyone to read your ranting. FAIL : ) And idiot: stop using fake emails, if you lie repeatedly how can you be trusted with the truth you stupid stalker?

    Bye nobody (ironic you yourself say you’re a nothing, at least you figured out that much)

    P.S.

    Ooops, accidentally approved of your last rant and noticed you mentioned “run on sentences”. Let see: insulting evidenceless rants vs run on sentences, which is worse? And Mr. I Can’t Understand Any Run On Sentences, if you’re too stupid to understand large works because you find one or a few run on sentences, Mr. Cheap Shot, what business do you have giving out “official awards for best writing”? Here’s an official reward from me: Official Award for Another Subject-Dodging Weasel Who Uses Cheap Insults When He Realizes He’s Lost or Is To Dumb to Refute What Was Said. Next Mr. Ad Hominem Erectus Dumbess: don’t dodge by using insults about how well the person wrote, just shows what an idiot and sore loser you are.

  18. November 29, 2011 at 12:48 PM

    “This argument has become real childish, picking apart comments, line-by-line, to prove your own childish biblical point against a childish atheist point.” Because you said so. So the article is childish because you, said so. And I’m going to have to read your three paragraph long explanation? to find out why… uh, no. Why? Because I already pointed out WHY THIS ARTICLE WAS CHILDISH IN AN ADULT MATURE MANNER you moron. What, an idiot. Ignored. And moron, can you not read? I SAID I WILL NO LONGER BE READING COMMENTS REGARDING THIS ARTICLE. CAN U NOT SEE SELF CENTERED MUST-BE-HEARD IDIOT THAT I’VE ALREADY DEALT WITH MANY CHILDISH IDIOTIC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS ARTICLE FROM MORON ATHEISTS WHO CAN’T FIRE OFF ONE BRAINCELL TO SAY ANYTHING GOOD OR SCIENTIFIC? Get lost!

  19. November 30, 2011 at 12:49 AM

    the hell are u talking about? i approved your comments. weird

  20. January 29, 2012 at 11:15 PM

    from JPaulHobson
    jpaulhobson@gmail.com
    Submitted on 2012/01/29 at 5:59 PM.

    Here is most of the rant of a moron narcissist “J Paul Hobson” falsely on this article (but it’s really his ad hominem attacks on me), with his comments in bold, and mine plain.

    “Out of curiosity, I made my way to this blog post about Michio Kaku. Michio Kaku, from what I have learned and observed of him thus far, is certainly a man to look up to.”

    Then you don’t know much and from what little I read of your comment you’re an ignorant moron who doesn’t know logical fallacies. If you had bothered to read this post carefully and were moral you’d know he is anan immoral person. If you deny God’s existence and will not praise him for whatever he does, if you take away credit from him by attributing it to random evolution, if you persecute his followers, the very ones who love him and whom he loves, you are not a good person.

    “He is knowledgeable on many levels”

    Logical fallacies: 1) It’s vague, you don’t even bother referring to the Bible or religion which is relevant to this post and 2) merely having knowledge doesn’t make you wise, but as God says, puffs a person up (makes them prideful in a bad way if there is nothing to temper it, like God causing you to be humble, and God certainly is not with this person who avoids acknowledging God and his love. Narcissists care more about knowledge then understanding. Already you’re giving evidence you’re a narcissist just like Michio and hence why you endorse him.

    “and has provided “proof” (this is of course, to yours truly) that I would most certainly want to study under him as I do now and recommend others to do so as well.”

    More logical fallacies: 1) Proof of what you vain idiot? VAGUE. 2) “yours truly” “most certainly would want to”? You sound like a narcissist. Why are you talking like that? What does this have to do with proof of, whatever? You’re an airheaded moron.

    “However, my biggest objection to this entire discussion has been towards that of the blog owner, knight.”

    As opposed to who else idiot? The words? The background image? You sure do sound like a narcissist to me. And “however” to what else? Why are your saying nonsensical things? What was the opposition in your statements that you said, “however”? Another sign of narcissism disorder: using flowery and formal wording in nonsensical ways.

    “It’s obvious you know your scriptures, I myself would not be able to recall Biblical statements, so on and so forth.”

    “so on and so forth” another narcissistic phrase in the way you used it.

    “Some, and this may not include you, believe that knowing the Scriptures is what makes them “good”

    It doesn’t include me moron, and why mention it? You’re wasting my time with your ignorance. If you don’t know, why are you speculating? MORON: STICK WITH THE SUBJECT OF THE ARTICLE MORON. Stop being a subject-switching weasel. You’re committing the fallacy of subject-switching by ignoring the subject and switching to another one that is irrelevant, and since you’re attempting to make me look bad rather than deal with the subject of the article, are committing the fallacy of ad hominem.

    “or “just” or “righteous” or whatever word you want to use to make yourself closer to God.”

    That made no sense. You’re ranted.

    “This is incorrect.”instead

    Okay Mr. Can Only Use Formal Speech Narcissist Idiot. If I know Scripture, and you obviously don’t why are you trying to teach me about it? Do you know the verse in which Jesus tells the Pharisees that they think they have eternal life because they study Scripture? Seems like a “no”. How about study it yourself before playing teacher of it or trying to advice me anything about it? As Jesus said to those judging Christians who are forgiven (not the false Christians):

    “Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. 38 Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.”

    39 He also told them this parable: “Can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into a pit? 40 The student is not above the teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like their teacher.

    41 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 42 How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when you yourself fail to see the plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

    ” True Christianity, like mentioned above,”

    You didn’t mention what it was moron. It’s mentioned all over my journal, on my about page which you didn’t bother to read, not even the first sentences, and on the how to be saved tab you ignored. You’re truly an evil judge.

    ” is a way of life.”

    Hypocrite: Who said it wasn’t? And why aren’t you living that life if you acknowledge it to be good?

    “Knowing the Bible does not make you a good person”

    And you don’t even know it, so why are you trying to teach anything about it?

    “(though it can certainly help if you learn from it).”

    So why don’t you learn from it if it will “certainly help”?

    “Your lack of patience for others is alarming.”

    Why don’t you stop being a fault-finding idiot and read the comments moron? Why do you say, “Oh your comments are nothing”? Moron do you see my lengthy replies idiot? Are you a fault-finding negative moron? Yes you are. And hypocrite: many morons like you, fault-finders as the Bible calls morons like you, would say that ANY reply I make past one sentence is a rant, and more than three A BOOK. Continue on your way to Hell son of the accuser Satan since you have no patience to read carefully what I write, but simply accuse me of having your own obvious failings. You damn a Christian no matter what he does son of Satan, because you are a son of Satan, a permanently bitter liar.

    Be alarmed that you judge and condemn based on your careless glances and deliberate ignoring what I say you idiot. Thirty nine pages of comments and 700 pages plus a dozen length books and endless answers and questions on Yahoo Answers and endless edits on Wikipedia constantly refuting and putting up with and battling trolls like you and worse, and endless abuse and in person, and your impatient smug self says, “I’m alarmed at your impatience.” What a deeply hateful and evil person you are, a person who only has some patience to breath out evil.

    Who are you to judge idiot? Why don’t you notice, you sick moron, the hateful comments left by sickos like yourself? By not mentioning them and only criticizing me you show your demonic heart and that you approve of hatred, not truth. Why don’t you notice the positive comments I made and say, “I’m happy that you took the time to respond to such hateful comments and thoroughly on many comments and wisely did not waste your time listening to and replying to endless careless babble but instead continuing to be helpful”. Is helpful responding to everything you tell me to you nasty poop worm? NO MORON! YOU’RE NOT GOD AND YOU’RE NOT WISE! You’re a moron who would have a Christian spend his time replying to every single little thing and pretending that only replying matters. What a MASSIVE MORON! With that sicko attitude you’d be old and dead and your energy spend you idiot. With that attitude he human race would all be dead from replying to exhausting morons like you! You’re an idiot!

    Why aren’t you alarmed you sick idiot at the IMPATIENT IDIOTS WHO MAKE IMPATIENT COMMENTS HERE IDIOT? WHY AREN’T YOU ALARMED AT THE ENDLESS HATRED OF ATHEISTS YOU IDIOT? WHY AREN’T YOU ALARMED AT THEIR SHORT TEMPERS YOU IDIOT? SHOW ME MORON YOUR JOURNAL THAT CAN COMPARE TO MINE, YOUR BOOKS AND COMMENTS YOU IDIOT! YOU CAN’T MORON, BECAUSE YOU’RE AN IMPATIENT MORON WHO HATES TO LEARN AND WILL NOT DO AS HE SAYS. YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE!

    You’re angry at Christians who spend what little money they have and their lives helping morons like you, unthankful idiots and the opposite, the poor and humble and grateful, and babies who were in danger of being murdered and cut to pieces, but you’re not angry at the of atheists who have mass murdered, murdered 150,000,000+ people in the past 100 years in the name of progress? Not that of atheists who murder babies to have a more convenient life? What about the baby’s life? All you have is mere hypocritical accusations without evidence. This entire journal displays extreme patience, and moron, if you had bothered to read my about me page you would have seen me referring to a book in which I carefully listed over 500 arguments against religion and writing over 25 replies/refutations to some of those arguments, cross-referencing them. Furthermore moron, if I write long replies and long articles, carefully, how is it you say I have no patience? If I write carefully worded articles and there is no way you can miss them, then why did you say that? Why did you use the word “alarming” you moron? Alarming to who? To everyone you idiot? No: you’re an exaggerating and lair and insulting me without knowing much about me or caring to because you’re a narcissist and as a narcissist, a permanently bitter and biased person who is always on the defensive and looking to insult others to make himself feel good, and to squelch his feeling of insecurity that day he was traumatized and his vain view oh himself severely wounded. You’re a permanently pride-hurt insecure idiot constantly trying to maintain an image of superiority. What’s alarming, hypocrite, is that you don’t have any patience to learn the truth, and think you are better than everyone else despite anything you say to the opposite. What’s alarming are the morons who are worse than you, filling the world, who won’t listen to anything a person says who they think even hints that God should be put in a good light, or that he might exist. Haven’t you ever been to the religion section of Yahoo Answers you idiot? In the religion section? Moron: it’s filled with troll atheists who immediately gang vote questions and answers they don’t like to be deleted, so that a question or answer is never seen. You’re truly an ignorant and vain hypocrite know-nothing. Or haven’t you been to Wikipedia? Do you know anything about it other than reading the current articles? No, because you’re an idiot. And if you do know, they you’re a deliberately deceptive idiot: atheists dominate Wikipedia and will IMMEDIATELY once they see a change that doesn’t agree with the atheistic view, delete the edit. They will only list views and often say why they are wrong, as if atheists have the only legitimate view of the world.

    “When others come to you and question God (regardless of their religious faith), his teachings, etc., you should not meet them with the equal/greater amount of hostility than they have shown you.”

    And who said I do moron? Are you a psychic god heart-reader you idiot? And if I do, why shouldn’t I moron? Because the narcissist failed god said so? WRONG. You’re not my God moron, and if God tells me to be angry at your evil ranting, then I will, and am. And if you think my anger is something, no way. God’s wrath will burn you alive.

    ” Instead, you should be praying for them and helping them to understand.”

    Okay Mr. Instead Comma, because you said so, you said I’m not helping anyone to understand because you put a pause after Instead and said I’m not. What an insulting dog poop on the bottom of my shoe you are. Moron, who said I’m not helping anyone to understand you “all-knowing” oblivious to the obvious idiot? So telling someone how to be saved in careful concise detail better than anyone else, and certainly you, isn’t helping anyone? Helping show that Michio is a narcissist, like you, and a panderer, in plain speech as opposed to your non-explanation and off topic rant using formal narcissist speech is? What a vain, smug, bitter conniving, idiot you are. The bulk of my journal which you didn’t bother reading is filled with helping people to understand. And so you’re watching me to know when I’m praying or not you idiot?! Wow, you’re a psychic eh? Or are you spying on me? What a crazy judge you are. And like Jesus said, “You hypocrite! GET THE PLANK OUT OF YOUR OWN EYE BEFORE PLAYING JUDGE OF THE CHRISTIAN WITH THE SPECK IN HIS EYE.” Get forgiven of your sins first before judging the one forgiven of his, hypocrite. You are not a teacher of Christianity, you’re a sinful moron who judges based on a glance. You don’t bother telling anyone how to be saved every day like I do moron, the greatest thing you can do for God with love for him, you don’t help the suicidal every day like I do moron, you don’t provide any unique or helpful information of all kinds like I do moron, but you’re playing judge and teacher over me and telling me to do what I already do and which you do not. Truly you are a narcissist.

    “Please, lead by example.”

    Why don’t you do so yourself you hypocrite? Why don’t you point out what I’ve done wrong rather than making mere accusations like your father Satan does all day? Judge not evil one, till your evil is forgiven.

    ” You claim that many follow you”

    Where do I claim that idiot liar? For that lie, the rest of your rant is ignored, and the Bible says anyways, to “ignore argument of ignorance” and you are one massive ignoramus. Get saved already hypocrite, and stop making excuses for ignoring God. Look for the how to be saved link on top of the page, which you conveniently ignore and don’t mention, evil fault-finder.

    How was that for patience, idiot? Super fail. Another atheist moron refute, and who serves as an awesome example of an atheist: a mentally ill, oblivious to the obvious, arrogant, deluded, lying, hypocrite. Now that’s a demonstration of patience a moron like you will never have.

    May God continue to bless you till you give him genuine love and thanks for once.

    Mentally ill morons like you however can never be pleased, because you are permanently bitter and on the defensive, always wanting to bully someone to get rid of the pain you experience when you were hurt as a youth.

  21. January 26, 2014 at 8:55 PM

    “First a good scientist always explains and credits another scientist of what he cannot disprove.”

    1. Why did you start out with “first”? Why is this a priority subject? So, firstly, you’ve already not made sense.
    2. What are you talking about? The hell does this have to do with anything? You talk like a 14 year old or younger, some youth who doesn’t know much about science or religion or much really, but wants to sound wise, so came up with something that sounds reasonable to say in his own mind, but actually isn’t.
    3. Your sentence makes no grammatical sense. What does “explains another scientist of what he cannot disprove” mean? NOTHING.

    “That’s all he did when he gave Einstein’s theory about god.”

    Einstein didn’t give any theory about God. He made statements, some opinions, but he always stated them as FACTS, not that they were, but he never theorized in statement as far as anyone knows. He said:

    I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details.
    Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.
    My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind.
    The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.
    Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.
    The scientists’ religious feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.
    There is no logical way to the discovery of elemental laws. There is only the way of intuition, which is helped by a feeling for the order lying behind the appearance.
    The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
    The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious; It is the source of all true art and science.
    We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality.
    Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the Gods.
    When the solution is simple, God is answering.
    God does not play dice with the universe.
    God is subtle but he is not malicious.
    A human being is a part of the whole, called by us Universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest-a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole nature in its beauty.
    Nothing will benefit human health and increase the chances for survival of life on Earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet.
    The man who regards his own life and that of his fellow creatures as meaningless is not merely unfortunate but almost disqualified for life.
    Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding.
    Only a life lived for others is a life worth while.
    The human mind is not capable of grasping the Universe. We are like a little child entering a huge library. The walls are covered to the ceilings with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written these books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. But the child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books—-a mysterious order which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects.
    The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery every day. Never lose a holy curiosity.
    What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism.
    The finest emotion of which we are capable is the mystic emotion. Herein lies the germ of all art and all true science. Anyone to whom this feeling is alien, who is no longer capable of wonderment and lives in a state of fear is a dead man. To know that what is impenetrable for us really exists and manifests itself as the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty, whose gross forms alone are intelligible to our poor faculties – this knowledge, this feeling … that is the core of the true religious sentiment. In this sense, and in this sense alone, I rank myself among profoundly religious men.
    The real problem is in the hearts and minds of men. It is easier to denature plutonium than to denature the evil spirit of man.
    True religion is real living; living with all one’s soul, with all one’s goodness and righteousness.
    Intelligence makes clear to us the interrelationship of means and ends. But mere thinking cannot give us a sense of the ultimate and fundamental ends. To make clear these fundamental ends and valuations and to set them fast in the emotional life of the individual, seems to me precisely the most important function which religion has to form in the social life of man.

    “Second he gave reason about why the earth is much older then what the Bible says it was.”

    1. So do creationists. You made no point. That’s a fallacy called begging the question.
    2. So what?
    3. WHO are you talking about, Mich or Einstein?

    “Stating it was created in 2040 BC.”

    1. LOL, who said this?
    2. This isn’t a grammatically understandble sentence either.

    “Him as a scientist can see geological evidence of the Grand Canyon being much older than 10,000 years old.”

    1. WHO as a scientist can see this? Mich or Einstein?
    2. There are creationists who are scientists too who don’t believe the unverse is older than 6,500 years because they too can see as scientists it isn’t.
    3. Merely becoming a scientists doesn’t give you the power to know everything.
    4. A person with common sense and who uses good judgment and research can also see the universe isn’t older than 6,500 years.
    5. Atheists and liberals themselves have said that merely being a scientist doesn’t make you knowledgeable or someone trustworthy in anything, or any field of science, like in the controversey over global warming. When those who rejected global warming came up with scientists who did too, atheists and liberals rejected most of these scientists because they weren’t experts in weather science.

    You’re obviously an ignoramus. Read the link I gave about my journal on creation/bible contradictions you narrow visioned oblivious guy.

    “He also says “He” personally has no proof of what others recognize from another person’s revelation with god.”

    1. Who cares?
    2. Who is “he”?
    3. What does it matter if he personally has it or not?
    4. What would public proof be?
    5. Do you even know what the difference between proof and evidence is? Buy some dictionaries or use the ones online and figure it out if you can.

    “He didn’t hear from god like other supposedly have”

    1. So?
    2. What does it matter if anyone has after the Bible was written? You’re an idiot no offense, a really dumb person.

    “and like most scientist”

    Huh? Who didn’t know that most “scientist” haven’t “personally heard from God”? You think no one knows this that you thought you should say it?

    “cannot trust it as fact without empirical evidence.”

    Sir: it doesn’t matter if it is “empirical” or not, what matters moron is if the person who said they heard from God is trustworthy, just as with a person who isn’t a scientist, like you obviously aren’t, being that you’re too stupid to be one, what matters is if that scientist THAT PEOPLE HERE FROM IS TRUSTWORTHY. I DON’T HAVE TO BE A SCIENTIST, NO ONE DOES, TO KNOW IF A SCIENTIST IS LYING OR NOT. I CAN TRUST HIS WORK ON FAITH IF HE IS A TRUSTWORTHY PERSON AND TEST HIS THEORY OR INVENTIONS IF I HAVE THE MEANS TO SEE IF THEY REALLY WORK OR HAVE VALUE. The same is true with the Bible and seeing if Christians really are “of God”, or some individual Christian. You babble in ignorance. You’re like a zombie parroting things in a nonsensical way. Satan has blinded you.

    “He didn’t deny a creator.”

    Well, you’re a babbling moron and not going to waste time on the rest of your LONG rant which I unpublished to save everyone the torment of going through.

    “Avoid arguments of ignorance” – the apostle Paul

    There’s a logical fallacies link on my journal for a reason, click it and read the site carefully. Stop babbling nonsense based on your feelings and disjointed memories and horrible logic. You have the mind of a child.

  1. April 3, 2010 at 3:02 PM
  2. April 3, 2010 at 3:04 PM
  3. May 1, 2012 at 4:55 AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 54 other followers

%d bloggers like this: