Archive

Archive for December, 2008

SciAm, Wikipedia, Wikiquote and ExpelledExposed.com Exposed: A Refutation In Defense of Ben Stein

December 25, 2008 Leave a comment

With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination. We build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly anyone is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed. The aid which we feel impelled to give to the helpless is mainly an incidental result of the instinct of sympathy – Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 1871.

It has been claimed that to quote Darwin in this way (including leaving out "excepting in the case of man", on Darwinian propaganda websites like wikipedia, wikiquote and expelledexposed.com, is misleading because of what Darwin wrote soon after those sentences. I agree that it is deceptive if the intent is ot make Darwin and other Darwinists look worse than they are. However, it makes sense to leave those parts out if you want to avoid complicating an explanation. I suspect that Ben Stein and certain Christians left those parts out was because of that and didn’t know how to explain why those parts he left out were not enough to prevent people like Hitler from using Darwinistic Evolutionary Theory to try and exterminate all Jews, Gypsies, and other races. They also may have left those parts out because they saw it as dishonest of Darwin himself to say those things, like someone with hatred in their heart ranting about how evil Christians are, but then to say near the end of their rant, "But a few Christians are decent… and if we were to exterminate them there would be a dark cloud around while doing so."

Furthermore, for Darwinists to claim that Darwin is being taken out of context in the way they are doing so is itself misleading in another way, and those websites which make this claim, not suprising to me, do not explain why to quote Darwin that was is misleading either). Those who claim to quote Darwin this way are the ones who are misleading, because they are misdirecting people from this part of what he said, "The aid which we feel impelled to give is mainly and INCIDENTAL RESULT OF THE INSTINCT of sympathy". Darwin did not say, "The help we want to give to others who are weak, stupid or diseased is due to a God programming us to be that way because he doesn’t want us to be uncaring to those kinds of people and we should not resist this instinct to be compassionate he gave us because he’s shown that he should be obeyed, and will punish us if we don’t obey him, and because we would not want others to treat us hatefully or to neglect us if we were or became weak, ignorant, feeble-minded, or diseased. And after that Darwin merely implied, without explaining why in the way I pointed out, that it would be evil not to help the weak, stupid and diseased, and so if someone were to believe, as Darwin taught, that the desire to want to help someone or to have sympathy is merely a meaningless product of a mindless process of evolution, and therefore NOT evil if we go against, and that to go against it would simply be natural and part of the process of evolution, or "survival of the fittest" as Darwinist put it. And, as evolutionists themselves teach, "Science is always progressing, it’s never perfect, we scientists are still learning," and therefore it is perfectly reasonable by their own excuse there, to quote Darwin that way, but to dismiss part of what he said for "progress", "evolving", "learning", "correcting" and "becoming more fit". The Darwinist Richard Dawkins himself would admit that there is no such thing as evil or good, and that Darwin was wrong to teach that there was, and that Darwin was either still partially deceived by religion, or afraid for some reason, like for fear of being seen as a cold monster, or insane, that there was no such thing as good or evil. So again, to claim that it’s deceptive to quote that part of Darwin I or others do, and not mention the rest, or to leave some sentences out in the quote, is what is the lie. There is no law in the Bible that says, "You must quote every word and sentence a person says or else you’re automatically misleading or lying or both," except the one that Christian-haters or religion-haters or confused person has made up. Furthermore, if it’s true that we merely evolved without God or with God merely watching us evolve, as these Darwinists who accuse me and others of lying claim, then there is no sin, and it’s not wrong to mislead, to lie, as they imply it is.

Furthermore, Darwin’s entire rant was wrong: Rancher’s, unless they are morons, don’t simply kill their "inferior" animals because such animals can be sold to those who don’t have any or if an animal is a runt, which Darwin and many Darwinists would see as inferior I’m sure, it is can made a pet or sold as a pet. On top of that, if the rancher want’s to increase his food or pet supply, he or she can allow the "inferior" animals to multiply in a seperate grazing area if there is enough for both them and the better animals he or she owns. So Darwin was stupid and short-sighted to teach that only smart ranchers kill their inferior/lesser animals, and stupid and short-sighted are the Darwinists who imply that Darwin was correct about that.

Darwin lied and gave a confusing message. In conclusion, let the war continue against those in America who apply this Darwinian reasoning to human beings, which are not animals any more than angels are animals. The ones who are most spiritually fit, will survive this war and prosper forever.

A Response To Judge Jim Villanucci, Judge of Christians, of 770 KKOB Radio

December 18, 2008 1 comment

Points That Jim and His False Christian Supporters Can’t Refute

1. Jim, why did you cut me off you radio show after a few dozen seconds of speaking with you, when I asked you why you were judging if it was wrong to judge and why you were judging another group’s religion (the Christian group) if you were (arbitrarily) opposed to Christians judging anyone, including other Christians, and after you implied that Jesus wouldn’t judge anyone? Did that offend your hypocritical self? Or was it when I asked why you were judging them over a simple verse you admitted that you were ignorant as to the meaning, and which they, who dedicate themselves to learning such verses, would undertand? You cut me off after I started to reply to your question as to why it may or may not be right for a church to announce the sin of a former member. Why did you do that when you said that that was the main topic of your show? Were you afraid that more truth would get out?

2. Are you so stupid as to think that if you join a group which is known for being HEAVILY INVOLVED IN SUPPORTING EACH OTHER SPIRITUALL BY GETTING TO KNOW EACH OTHER INTIMATELY, that it is therefore wrong for them to JUDGE in ANY WAY another member of that group? So they should just sit still and be thoughtless statues making no judgments about right or wrong? That’s dumb.

3. It is repeatedly made clear in the Bible that Christians (and Christians are anyone who follows the Messaih, who is made known in the Old Testament, not just the New, that Christians do correct each other when they do wrong (not meaning pointing out every little thing, which you stupidly make equal to every kind of sin with your “everyone sins” comments – which by the way is how abusive HYPOCRITES JUSTIFY DOING WHATEVER THEY FEEL LIKE – and are commanded to correct each other. So when you join a group of Christians, it’s UNDERSTOOOD THAT YOU ARE THEN UNDER THE JUDGMENT OF ALL CHRISTIANS, AND NOT JUST THE ONES IN THE LOCAL GROUP, BUT ALL.

4. You stereotped all Christians as being Catholic, it sounded like, with the mass comment, even if you didn’t mean that, its careless comments like that that give people the idea that all Christians are Catholics, and many, even Catholics, think that Catholics are hypocrites.

5. You’re slandering all Christians, and you made it clear you know little about them, as being sinful.

6. If sin is “oooooo” as you mock, then what you are so upset for over the sins of these Christians you don’t even know? Duh?

7. Why are you playing judge over all Christians, and these sins you’re talking about, if you can’t even understand the simple verse you quoted, as you admit you can’t?

8. Are you wiser than Jesus? Why then are you mocking him? How many lives have you saved and changed for the better like he and his followers have? Do you have any books that are as helpful as the Bible and that ended up being the most widely read book for decades and still is?

9. It’s stupid and arrogant, and nutty for you to condem those who study verses that you admit you ignore and are ignorant of. How are you qualified then to judge?

10. What moron doesn’t know that doing wrong in public, or admitting to it without showing concern, often does tempt others to dothe same, and often it leads to inefficiency, injuries and death?

11. To better understand the verse you are quoting, read the verses that come before and after it; context Jim, context.

12. Are you so shallow and stupid to think that you can’t date a person to get to know if they are gay? or evil?  Big duh? And where does the Bible say that marraige should be based on how good the other person is at having sex? Are you that warped and dumb?

13. You agreed with a caller who said that usually a person who is pointing out another person’s sin is covering up there own, WELL THEN BOTH YOU AND THE CALLER AND EVERYONE POINTING EVERYONE ELSES WRONGS, MUST BE COVERING UP FOR YOUR OWN YOU HYPOCRITE!

14. WHAT DOES A PERSON’S AGE HAVE TO DO WITH WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE FREE FROM GOD’S COMMANDS AND THAT INCLUDES THE JUDGEMENT HE ASSIGNS OTHERS TO MAKE! Using your logic, I can say, “Hey I’m 45, therefore I can do all the wrong I want and commit adultery and murder and be free from any kind of punishment.

15. As for casting stones, who the Hell is casting stones you idiot? They are warning, NOT CASTING LITERAL STONES.

16. Sin is a big deal because God warned, and repeatedly demonstrated throughout history, and some is recorded in the Bible, that he hates disobedience against himself, and will punish you for disobeying him, and for those he doesn’t forgive before they die, they will end up suffering forever. So no Jim, it isn’t “ooooooo” you moron, it’s LIFE AND DEATH.

The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. – JESUS, WHO YOU AND SOME OF YOUR CALLERS ACKNOWLEDGED WAS PERFECT, INCLUDING IN JUDGMENT, and if he was perfect in judgment, do you think that his true, not true just in word, but true followers of him might have some of his good judgment?

17. And you asked if the woman who committed adultery had commnited a victimless crime, but hardly when you said, “right?” meaning “isn’t that correct?”, no it isn’t because God is the victim since we are his servantsn- whether you like it or believe t or not – and he commanded us not to disobey him, and to fully love him, not anger him. Further, the adulteress has put herself in danger of punishment by disobeying God without repenting of it, and the man she is sinning with will also end up being a victim of her disobedience since God will punish him too. The punishment may be mental (like God causing you to lose something of value, like money) or physical.  Further, if the woman was a member of that church, even if she wasn’t saved, she victimized that church by sinning against them by sinning against their Father. It’s like if I insulted you by insulting your father or wife of child, or insulted a teacher you trusted and trained under who you loved, which would be insulting you, though indirectly.

18. One of your stupid false Christian callers asked us, “would Jesus really do this?” meaning “would he really point out someone’s sins in public?” MORONS HE DID THAT REPEATEDLY IN THE NEW TESTAMENT, HE DID IT TO THE PHARISEES AND IN GENERAL SAID THAT EVERYONE WAS A SINNER. HE REBUKED PETER, ONE OF HIS OWN DISCIPLES IN FRONT OF THE OTHERS AND SAID, “SATAN GET BEHIND ME!”. YOU ARE CLUELESS AND STUPID AS ARE THOSE FALSE CHRISTIANS SUPPORTING YOU TO SPEAK IN THE NAME OF MAN YOU DON’T EVEN KNOW! AND YOU ARE QUOTING A VERSE THAT HE GAVE YOU MORONS! HE IS THE ONE WHO SAID TO “TELL IT TO THE CHURCH”. DUH! So you are denying the very words you are reading that came from his mouth, yet replied to that caller, “There’s no way [that Jesus would pointout a person's sins].” And she agreed of course. And even dumber is that Jesus repeatedly said that he would judge the entire world in front of the entire world, down to every “idle word” when he returned, and send most of the ones he judged to Hell. That is taught all through the Bible. He also acknowledged that the Old Testament, which taught the same things over and over, WAS TRUE! So stop lying and pretending to be a good and moral loving person already. Stop assuming things about Christians and the Bible now, judge Villian, and STOP “CASTING STONES” like you said is wrong to do. Don’t quote the Bible and pretend to know it when you admit that you don’t, don’t quote the Bible and claim it teaches what it doesn’t when you refuse to obey it AT ALL. It’s amazing that you can be such a massive obvious hypocrite in front of the world and the world still supports you. Clearly Satan exists.

Oh wow, now I hear the topic is whether or not certain parents should be allowed to be parents over their kids, and you boasting about the future like you’re some prophet, that the child named “Adolph Hitler” can never be president, or anyone else with that name. You’re no Christ-follower, no teacher of the Bible, untrustworthy, a liar, and no prophet.

Wow, at 5:21 P.M. I just heard Judge Villian say, “I’m not big on laws“. Yet you play judge over the Law of God, THE ENTIRE BIBLE, and over Christ who fully endorsed and obeyed it, and still does, and the millions of Christians who do too. So that’s why you defend breakers of good laws and hate those who obey  them. Jim and his false Christian and anti-Christian friends: It’s not law-breakers and haters of good laws that make good people, that make helpful and constructive judges, leaders, or engineers, it’s Law-abiders.

Yet Another Bigot Atheist Who Thinks His Mere Claims With Boasting and Mocking Is Scientific Proof

December 17, 2008 Leave a comment

Here is one of many false reviews (with my replies) on Amazon.com against a creationist book (the amazon CEO and his company moderators are fine with false and slanderous attacks against Christians) on  the book Of Pandas and People

(5 Stars [Which moron Tony and other atheist morons like himself gave the book in order to trick people into reading their review) 64 of 190 people found the following review helpful: Truth is finally revealed!, September 26, 2005 By Tony P. Konig "K-Tone"

"That silly fossil record has all the scientists fooled."

1. Not the creationist scientists.

2. Why did you stereotype all scientists as not being creationists? Do you know what lying is? Do you know what evidence is? Because evidence are not insults. Did you notice that the authors of this book were biologists, scientists, unlike you, moron? So then if scientists are the ones who are always right, according to your mind, why then are you slandering them? Contradict yourself much? Hence you reveal what a biased person you are. Would you believe evolutionist scientists then, gullible one who believes whatever matches his feelings? Testing 1 2 3, testing:

textbook discussions of ancestral descent are "a festering mass of unsupported assertions." – John Bonner, a biologist at Princeton

"Fossils are a great embarrassment to Evolutionary theory and offer strong support for the concept of Creation." – Dr. Gary Parker, Ph.D., Biologist AND paleontologist AND textbook author AND FORMER Evolutionist)

Still there with your fairytale "only evolutionists are scientists" belief?

3. What is your evidence the fossil record conforms to Darwinian theory? Oh, let me guess, you believed the little quotes and pictures in your 3rd grade biology class, and after having heard the propaganda lines like, "the fossil record proves evolution" repeated to you over and over, decided that it just must be true. No wait, you saw a cartoon, no wait, you watched a movie on the Discovery Channel in 3D! And you know when it’s 3D it just must be true! No wait you saw a "paleontologist" with an Indiana Jones hat on whining about how the fossil record is "tantalizingly" incomplete (and that supports evolution how moron?) Dummy says what? "But ‘tantalizing is a big word, sir, and people who use big words, especially who say they are paleontologists and go to a important-sounding university, must be right." Why then moron don’t you believe the scientist from Princeton, who admits secular biology books are filled with assumptions? Say what? "Well, cuz I didn’t see him in a neat 3D cartoon animation on the Discovery Channel, and not with a Indiana Jones hat on either, I loves those hats, it’s my favorite hat." Ok scoffer, but moving on to the rest of your "scientific" analysis:

4. Did you bother to read about and look at the evidence (which dummies like yourself hide by babbling dumb ignorance and never bothering to listen carefully but rather obsess on your feelings, awww, your feelings, how scientific). Hint super dummy: Answers In Genesis or Forbidden Archeology. Read super moron, read. And look at the pictures too, we know you like pictures. Don’t you just demonstrate how good you are are listening with your rant, but not replying to what’s in the book, but making dumb insults in ignorance? No, so read moron, read, read things other than your own reviews, based on your dumb assumptions in rehashed years old defeated "proof".

"Don’t they get it? God is messing with our heads."

Moron, don’t blame God for your mistakes made due to you following your heart rather than being careful in what you believe. Don’t blame God, you moron, when you make mistakes due to you assuming things, and believing what merely seems right, than what is right. But it is true, that he controls your heart, and does not want all to be saved, hence why you, a moron, may be a moron forever:

"[God] has blinded their eyes and deadened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts, nor turn" – John 12:40

And he also uses Satan to accomplish this:

The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. – 2 Corinthians 4:4

"He wants to challenge us to really have faith by putting something so believable in front of your eyes that it can not be denied…"

Like this super moron?: shroud.com

Awwww: was a supernaturally made image of Jesus upon his resurrection, as recorded by the archaeologically proven (not proven to morons like you who suffer from mental-laziness, delusions of grandeur, and skepticemia however) Bible? How about this Mr. Fossil Record Proves My Scientific Feelings True:

http://www.s8int.com/images/foss-tree.jpg

I like how that fossilized tree trunk is sticking like a middle finger up at you right up through those millions of years old strata layers. Oh but wait let me guess, "It’s just an illusion! Satan put it there!" : )

On and where’s the roots? I wonder why they are gone… hint hint, hit hard by the flood waters you. Oh and by the way, those TRUNKS (not that one wasn’t sufficient evidence to refute scoffers like yourself) are in Germany and there are a forest of them in Yellowstone too.

Can you tell us how these fossils fit in to your oh so obvious logical progression of fossils?: http://www.nwcreation.net/anomalies.html

Oh you didn’t know about those? G I wonder why. Not. Moron what made you think all scientists are honest and that CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS JUST HAPPENED TO BE THE DISHONEST ONES, YOU MORON? CAN EXPLAIN THAT BIAS YOU IDIOT? Don’t ya know creation scientists are in the habit of sabotaging fellow creation scientists to get grant money and to get teaching positions in universities like evolutionist scientists are known for doing by many morons (but apparently not by ignorant morons like yourself). Can you really blame your being fooled on their propaganda and them hiding the truth so that they can become famous and make money and not have to hear about that oh so "unfun" Bible? Can you really blame them for you not taking a few seconds to ponder if evolutionist scientists were perfect or not, and why they might not be? CLAIMING TO BE A SCIENTIST AND PRACTICING "SCIENCE" OR EVEN DOING SO MOST OF YOUR LIFE WILL NOT MAKE YOU A MORAL PERSON IDIOT, ANYONE CAN DO SCIENCE AND DENY THE RESULTS. BIG MASSIVE DUH. I MEAN YOU’RE ONLY ACCUSING MILLIONS OF CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS AND CHRISTIANS PRACTICING SCIENCE OF DOING THE SAME, SO HOW DID THAT SLIP PAST YOU IDIOT? FULL OF BITTER HATE MUCH?

"and then contradicting it with the book he gave mankind."

Oh yes you moron, don’t you know the Bible you don’t read, let alone carefully, says, "Animals evolved." DON’T YOU KNOW?

"The point God is making is that science should be denied"

AND THIS VERSE IS WHERE? GOD INVENTED SCIENCE THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO, WHEN HARDLY ANY IRRELIGIOUS MORONS LIKE YOU, IF ANY, EXISTED:

HYPOTHESIS: DOES GOD HAVE THE ABILITY TO ACCOMPLISH THINGS SUPERNATURALLY AND AM I TALKING TO GOD?: Gideon said to God, "If you will save Israel by my hand as you have promised"

FIRST TEST: "’look, I will place a wool fleece on the threshing floor. If there is dew only on the fleece and all the ground is dry, then I will know that you will save Israel by my hand, as you said.’ And that is what happened. Gideon rose early the next day; he squeezed the fleece and wrung out the dew—a bowlful of water.

REPEAT THE TEST: "Then Gideon said to God, ‘Do not be angry with me. Let me make just one more request. Allow me one more test with the fleece. This time make the fleece dry and the ground covered with dew." That night God did so. Only the fleece was dry; all the ground was covered with dew.

So what were you saying ignorant psuedoscientist false wise man, scoffer?

"regardless of how much sense it makes"

Speaking for the world again, which is hardly all atheists, and contains 60+ million Calvinists who know you’re wrong?

"because our fate depends on it."

Yeah, you really needed to add that part, that just made so much to include in your rant.

"Faith trumps logic for most people in the world."

Your’re so right, and that must then include you moron, and the rest of the world who believes in evolution, which doesn’t include Calvinists, the minority. Thank you, moron, for contradicting yourself again. Let’s have another example of that baseless faith (hint hint… faith doesn’t mean "illogical" definition-impaired moron) that you fully admit the world often has in place of logic:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeoraptor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown

So what was that your moron evolutionist friends said, jokingly, in mockery of Christians, about Satan tampering with fossils? DUR?

"That’s the way humans are supposed to be."

Insano who thinks he’s God, suffering from delusions of granduer, says what? Clearly you’re no scientist, no wise man. You are an unoriginal moron though.

"I mean, we’re not Vulcans, thank God."

Yes, we’re not the emotionless moron make-believe aliens made up by an atheist moron. What’s your point unfunny time-wasting dork?

"If you let logic trump faith;"

Dummy, get a dictionary, and look up "logic" and "faith". They aren’t mutually exclusive words. Stop assuming what the Bible teaches, actually carefully read or listen to what you argue against next time, don’t assuming then you won’t be arguing against against your nonsensical imagination.

"if you decide to believe in the illusion that God created to test your faith,"

What illusion? Fantasize much?

"you will fail the test and roast in the fires of hell forever."

No moron, it’s hating God and not repenting of it, which will have you suffering forever in Hell, in total darkness, with a worm constantly eating away at your burning rotting body, while you tearfully scream in agony, forever in shame for having followed your feelings over the obvious truth.

"It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, where ‘their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.’ Everyone will be salted with fire." – Jesus, who, unlike you, has, for thousands of years been saving lives, and improving them, and making peace where there was Hell. Who’s word, unlike yours, is a best seller, and has been for decades. So who are you, to speak against him, and arrogantly like you do? Get a life scoffer.

"Put your faith in the Big Prankster."

Oh the  moron with his backwards mind, calls God "Satan", and makes light of Satan on top of it. No moron, God is The Truth, who made a clearly beautiful universe, clearly full of order, adhering to "laws" and even gave us moral laws, good ones, which you did not come up with. So what was that about "illusions" and "pranks", blind moron? I don’t see randomness or chaos anywhere except in the thoughts of morons like you, who’s logic is no logic at all, but the baseless faith you accuse Christians of having, you dumb moronic hypocrite. Stop projecting, stop trying to drag everyone down to your dumb level. Stop being jealous that God chose to allow others to see the obvious, and that you have no way to refute it but with nutty insults.

"He’s just messing with you."

Unfunny third grade brat who’s shaming himself in front of adults says what?

"He created the fossil record at the same time he created all the living beings on this planet."

Huh? Hey everyone let’s go to irc.org and answersingenesis.org to learn some real science instead of dumb third grader poo-poo jokes. Progress is great!

"This is a test of faith."

Will you stop rambling already dummy? Oy my, look, more stupidity below:

"Doesn’t it comfort you that God would play such a joke on mankind?"

Hey, do you know when to quit an unfunny joke, and when endless repition is useless? How about if I call you moron 6000 times more in a row, then will you get the point you Show-off-of-his-stupid-feelings?

"He gave us the intelligence to figure out the logical progression of life from clues he planted intentionally to fool us,"

Hey dummy, are you still ranting nutsense? Yeah, don’t we all know that what are "clues ["OF EVOLUTION" YOU WEASEL WORDING IDIOT] are clues of evolution to everyone else, including the 60+ million creationists and Calvinists like me? Why do you morons always speak like that for everyone on the planet, including tens of millions who DISAGREE WITH YOU? WHY? DUH? COULD SOMEONE BE A MASSIVELY DELUDED ARROGANT IDIOT? I THINK SO. How about instead of repeating your dumb opinions, you instead study carefully? Is that too hard for your lazy mind to do? Too much pain to think huh? Yes, it is easier to type uncreative unoriginal dumb opinions over and over, but progress is much better, learning the truth is much better, don’t you think?

"then he gave us a book whose wisdom challenges the logical progression he laid"

Still making a fool of yourself? Can you show us this "logical progression", at least one picture of life starting by chance and then evolving into a man? Come on even one transitional fossil out of the billions that supposedly once existed over the billions of years that they supposedly did? Dur? Oh you’re going to show me a picture form who? National Geographic? Aren’t those the same morons that were duped by the archeoraptor "transitional fossil"? Aren’t those the ones who pretended that deformed flatfish becoming more deformed was, LOL, EVOLUTION, and that it couldn’t be explained by Intelligent Design believers (oh yes it’s just so hard to explain why a planet God cursed with death and evil morons like yourself keep getting more deformed, damn, that’s just so hard, dur). So why then why, would you show me anything from them, you idiot, or any other idiots who were duped like them, which includes you?

Another free tip for you: repeating "high words" and phrases doesn’t make you right or intelligent moron, and if it did, you’d be one of the dumbest of all in comparison to creationists and Calvinists. Another free hint: Saying that you’re right doesn’t make you right idiot, so no matter how many times you claim to be logical (and you’ve shown yourself to be a moron instead) it won’t make you logical. But do tell us about this book which trumps anything you’ve ever done in your worthless life… Hello? Still there?

"out and told us to believe in it, or else."

No dummy, he didn’t say that. But thanks for making it ever more clear what an assuming moron you are:

"You may say to yourselves, "How can we know when a message has not been spoken by Yahweh?" If what a prophet proclaims in the name of Yahweh does not take place or come true, that is a message Yahweh has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him." – Deuteronomy 18:21-22 ("Ooopie" you? Go punch yourself in the face now? That’s only the fifth book in the Bible, out of about 66, written about 4000 years ago. Was that too late of a hint for you, oh scientific genius and wise man of the obvious? DUR? DOH?)

"Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the miracles themselves." – John 14:11, Yeshuah, the man born of a virgin, as prophecied (can you prophecy air head?), who is far more famous than you for being both wise and good, unlike you.

"Now he’s waiting to see whether he can float us on a cloud"

No arrogant dummy: "all things are possible with God." – Mark 10:27,

"or roast us on a spit for all eternity based on our decision.

These thoughts are what help me to sleep peacefully at night."

Where does say"roast us on a spit" in the Bible, moron scoffer? Tell us mocker. But since you are making fun of your Creator, and using a lie to do it, can you imagine what he will do to you on the day of judgment? Dur? An can you figure out yet why he would punish a severely evil man like you, for all eternity? Can you figure it out slanderer and mocker of Jesus (Jesus who suffered an eternity of pain and allowed himself to be shamefully executed for evil men like you)? Can you figure it out you who insulted all the Christians, including Christian kids, who suffered to do right, even when being punished unjustly by evil ignorance-loving scoffers like you, even to death? Can you figure it out you who insulted all the Christian kids who have been tortured to death in evil ways by men like you, and the babies who were murdered because their parents were Christians? Dur? Can you figure it out you who WON’T REPENT and MOCKS GOD ON TOP OF IT? DUR? DOH? You’re a dumb scoffer.

"Penalties are prepared for mockers, and beatings for the backs of fools." – Proverbs 19:29

"the smoke of their torment rises for ever and ever. There is no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and his image, or for anyone who receives the mark of his name." – Revelation 14:11

"How long will you simple ones love your simple ways? How long will mockers delight in mockery and fools hate knowledge? If you had responded to my rebuke, I would have poured out my heart to you and made my thoughts known to you. But since you rejected me when I called and no one gave heed when I stretched out my hand, since you ignored all my advice and would not accept my rebuke, I in turn will laugh at your disaster; I will mock when calamity overtakes you, when calamity overtakes you like a storm, when disaster sweeps over you like a whirlwind, when distress and trouble overwhelm you. Then they will call to me but I will not answer; they will look for me but will not find me. Since they hated knowledge and did not choose to fear Yahweh, since they would not accept my advice and spurned my rebuke, they will eat the fruit of their ways and be filled with the fruit of their schemes. For the waywardness of the simple will kill them, and the complacency of fools will destroy them; but whoever listens to me will live in safety and be at ease, without fear of harm." – Proverbs 1:22

"He mocks proud mockers but gives grace to the humble." – Proverbs 3:34

Will those thoughts also help you to sleep at night too? Keep heaping up your sins stupid, you’ll only be punishing yourself in the end.
 
P.S.:

Tony is, in his own words: "an enthusiast of Buddhism, I am inclined to agree that I would have liked to heard more from the Dalai Lama himself". Yes, but his actions or should I say inactions, Tony the gullible-violence lover, are more important that his words. That video was made in part by those foul-mouthed atheists speaking on the video – now if you don’t believe your own kind, then who will you believe?

The people you support reflect your personality. I support Jesus; who do you support world?

Yet Another Asburd Atheist Website

December 17, 2008 Leave a comment

I got these statements from a moron atheist’s page on myspace:

"Anti-evolution arguments are hardly a problem for evolution."

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Then he said:

"If you feel differently, feel free to spend some time on these websites."

Already have moron, but why didn’t you show the replies by creationists, let alone creation scientists to those websites? Truth-hiding moron? Because it makes you look stupid, that’s why, and you hate the truth when it makes you look stupid and doesn’t fit your feelings.

How Atheism Makes You Dumb and Destructive – PART 2

December 17, 2008 Leave a comment

And now back to Wynona:

Comment by Wynona Lavota on November 20th 2008 07:55:

"IMO"

Pretentious moron your opinion is not humble if you arrogantly oppose God like you do. Stop pretending to be good, it’s insulting to those who are, LIKE GOD.

"atheists are the unknown,"

You stupid moron. Can’t you even be bothered to check the facts on at least Atheistpedia, excuse me Wikipedia on atheists? How the freak are the unknown you jerk, when morons like yourselves constantly pollute the net with your dumb nonsensical rehash, when tons of millions of Buddhists are atheists, when stupid attention-seeking pagans keep claiming to be atheist to have an opportunity to reply to Christians speaking to atheists, when millions of atheists persecute Christians TO DEATH in the worst ways, in front of the family members of those Christians, FOR THE PLEASURE OF THE ATHEISTS DOING THE TORTURING AND MURDERING, YOU INSULTING INSULTING HATEFUL JERK, THAT INCLUDES YOU SCOFFER AND DERIDER ALT_ED (YES, YOU EVIL TROLLS ARE MURDERERS, LET ALONE THE "DERIDERS" YOU HYPOCRITES), AND WHEN YOU MORONS KEEP TAKING CHRISTIANS TO COURT OVER "RELIGIOUS VIOLATIONS", LIKE PRAYING AT SCHOOL OR HAVING A BIBLE CLUB AT SCHOOL, WHEN YOU MORONS STEAL TAX PAYER MONEY FROM CHRISTIANS YOU STUPID EVIL JERKS, TO PUSH, FOR DECADES NOW, THE FALSE RELIGION OF HUMANISTIC SCIENCE (SCIENCE WITH THE INTENT OF KEEPING GOD’S WILL AND ACTS AS AN ULTIMATE EXPLANATION FOR ANYTHING OR CLEAR MIRACLES AND WITH THE INTENT TO MAKE MAN, ANIMALS, OR NON-LIVING THINGS THE OBJECTS OF WORSHIP) ? HOW THE FREAK ARE YOU UNKNOWN TO THE WORLD FOR KEEPING UP AN ENDLESS AGENDA AGAINST THE TEACHING OF ANYTHING RESEMBLING THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IN SCHOOL, OR HISTORY THAT ACKNOWLEDGES THE ROLE OF CHRISTIANS OR THE BIBLE IN THE FORMATION OF ANYTHING, YOU BLIND SICKO? GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE SAND OF YOUR WORTHLESS OPINIONS!

AND YOU THEN SAID, "the odd ones out-"

Morons, Calvinists are the unknowns and odd ones out. And moron, merely being unknown and the odd ones out doesn’t mean that people will be subject to discrimination unless it’s sickos like you who are the majority. You sickos also persecute the majority, which isn’t you.

AND YOU THEN SAID: "like immigrants or homosexuals so they’re subject to discrimination because they represent something the theists are scared to explore in themselves"

MASSIVE MASSIVE MORON, HOMOSEXUALITY IS PRACTICED MANY IN CHRISTIAN SECTS LET ALONE NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS, YOU MORON.

SECOND, MASSIVE MORON, AMERICA IS MADE UP OF IMMIGRANTS, YOU IDIOT. SO HOW, YOU IDIOT, CAN IMMIGRANTS BE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST? ON TOP OF THAT, THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS IN AMERICA OUT NUMBER THE LEGAL ONES IN MANY PLACES, AND ARE SHOWN FAVORITISM LIKE IGNORANTS LIKE YOU, DUE TO YOUR FALSE BELIEFS ABOUT BOTH MINORITIES AND MAJORITIES! SO HOW THE HELL CAN YOU CLAIM THEY ARE "DISCRIMINATED" AGAINST, YOU IGNORANT IGNORANT IDIOT? HOW EXCEPT THAT YOU, LIKE EVERY OTHER ATHEIST, IS MENTALLY STUNTED FOR CONSTANTLY OBSESSING ON YOUR OWN OPINIONS AFTER GETTING TIRED OF LEARNING ANYTHING NEW, AND REPEATEDLY REJECTING EVEN OBVIOUS TRUTHS? GROW UP ALREADY! EVEN ANTHONY FLEW, ONE OF THE WISEST ATHEISTS EVER, WAS A MORON! THAT IDIOT, AFTER FINALLY BECOMING A THEIST, HAD NO ANSWER AS TO WHETHER OR NOT GOD CARED ABOUT MAN! THAT’S HOW MENTALLY STUNTED YOU MORONS ARE: THAT AFTER YEARS OF LISTENING TO THE TRUTH, YOU STILL CAN’T FIGURE OUT SOMETHING UTTERLY OBVIOUS LIKE THAT: GOD SHOWING LOVE, LET ALONE HATE!

Furthermore, MORON, how the hell do you not know that there are tens of thousands of former homosexuals, and MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO DID NOT START OUT CHRISTIANS, BUT WERE MORONS LIKE YOU, EVEN ATHEISTS, WHO AFTERWARDS BECOMING CHRISTIANS OR SOME OTHER KIND OF THEIST (THOUGH IF NOT A CHRISTIAN CERTAINLY KEPT THEIR HOMOSEXUAL ORIENTATION)? HOW CAN YOU NOT KNOW THAT WHICH IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE IN THE WORLD? YOU DON’T KNOW, BECAUSE YOU OBSESS ON YOURSELF AND WHATEVER AGREES WITH YOU, AND TO YOUR SHAME IGNORE ALL ELSE THAT CONTRADICTS IT! Not that it’s always intentional, clearly, and as the Bible teaches, Satan blinds the world so that they don’t notice things often, but at the same time, it is very clear that most of you DENY any statements or thoughts that are contrary to what you believe. And do you have any excuse for not doing a simple search on the net, by typing in the opposite of what you believe to see if there is any truth to it? NO! NONE! YOU WASTE YOUR TIME DOING OTHER THINGS, SO WHY CAN’T YOU DO THAT, AND THAT’S NOT EVEN A WASTE OF TIME, IT’S BEING WISE, SOMETHING YOU ALL CLEARLY HATE BEING, EXCEPT IN BEING WISE IN DOING EVIL.

AND THEN YOU SAID: "They’re scared to question their beliefs,"

Read above. Furthermore, moron, how can you not have heard of former Christians or theists? So you’ve never met an atheist that was a former theist? REALLY? UR THAT IGNORANT? And clearly you are saying on top of that, THAT ANYONE WHO DOESN’T BECOME AN ATHEIST IS SCARED TO QUESTION THEIR BELIEFS, AND MERELY BELIEVES WHAT? WHAT THEY WERE FIRST TAUGHT? WHAT THEY WERE TAUGHT LATER ON WHICH THEY DIDN’T BELIEVE? WHICH IS IT DUMMY? BECAUSE IF IT’S AFTER WHAT THEY FIRST BELIEVED, THEN HOW CAN YOU SAY THEY DIDN’T QUESTION YOU IDIOT? CLEARLY THEY HAD TO IF THEY REASONED THAT THEIR FORMER BELIEFS WERE WRONG! DUR!

Further, and this is obvious you moron, who the Hell do you know that has never questioned their beliefs? MORON DID YOU EVEN BOTHER TO READ THE FREE BIBLE WHICH COVERS EVERY SQUARE INCH OF GROUND AND IS THE MOST TRANSLATED AND CAREFULLY TRANSLATED BOOK IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD? IT’S FREE YOU MORON, IT’S CHANGED THE WORLD FOR THE BETTER REPEATEDLY IN ALL PLACES, READ IT IDIOT, YOU MIGHT NOTICE A STORY OR TWO OR COMMENTS ABOUT NOT TO LOSE FAITH. MORON. MAYBE, JUST MAYBE MORON, IF YOU WALKED UP TO ONE RELIGIOUS PERSON, OR USED THE NET, AND ASKED, "HAVE YOU EVER QUESTIONED YOUR BELIEFS, OR LOST FAITH" YOU’D GET A CLUE! MORON, IF YOU BOTHERED TO GO INTO A BIBLE STUDY OR CHURCH OR READ THE BIBLE, YOU’D NOTICE IN IT, QUESTIONS FROM IDIOTS LIKE YOURSELF! DUR! DUR! DUR! AND ACCUSATIONS TOO WHICH SUPPOSEDLY ARE ONLY MADE AGAINST YOU, THOUGH RUBY AND OTHER MORONS LIKE YOURSELF FILLED THIS PAGE WITH PLENTY OF THEM AGAINST THEISTS! YOU HYPOCRITES!

AND WORST OF ALL FOR YOU, IS YOU ARE TALKING TO SOMEONE WHO WROTE THE MOST COMPLETE BOOK ON "ACCUSATORY QUESTIONS" AND ARGUMENTS AGAINST CHRISTIANITY AND RELIGION, MANY OF WHICH I CAME UP WITH MYSELF! IT WASN’T WRITTEN BY MORONS LIKE YOU, STUPID STUPID LAZY MINDED MORON IGNORANTS LIKE YOU, INSULTING SMUG JERKS WHO INSULT TORTURED TO DEATH-BY-ATHEISTS CHRISTIAN CHILDREN LIKE YOU HAVE, BUT BY ME, A CALVINIST, WHO UNLIKE YOU HYPOCRITES, DID QUESTION HIS BELIEFS, BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER, SURE YOU MORONS CLAIM TO QUESTION, BUT YOU ARE BIASED AND HYPOCRITICAL IN YOUR"QUESTIONS". SEE, AS WYNONA NEXT SAID, AND MADE MORE EVIDENCE WITH HER OH SO "HUMBLE OPINION":

"scared to think for themselves"

Hey moron, at the Walmart near there is an Asian atheist who freaks out at the mention of Jesus being good and literally walks away quickly to avoid you or tries to talk over you to shut you up, HE CANNOT BE BOTHERED TO EVEN HEAR ABOUT RELIGION UNLESS YOU ARE SUBTLE ABOUT IT, AND EVEN BEING SUBTLE ABOUT IT PUTS HIM IN RUN AWAY LIKE A SCARED MORON MODE. And like I said massive smug insulting moron, arrogant moron, I, UNLIKE YOU, THINK FOR MYSELF, QUESTIONED MY OWN BELIEFS WITHOUT BIAS, UNLIKE YOU YOU HYPOCRITE. WHAT YOU ARE DESCRIBING IS ATHEISTS. I’VE NEVER MET, YOU MORON, A CALVNIST THAT ACTED LIKE THAT ASIAN, I’VE MET MORMONS, JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES, PAGANS, AND ATHEISTS WHO ACTED LIKE THAT, THEY ALL ACTED LIKE THAT, EVEN THE HATEFUL ONES THAT GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO PERSECUTE YOU.

"because maybe, if they find they cannot believe in their faith anymore due to inconsistancy,"

You’re talking about atheists you inconsistant moron who couldn’t spell inconsistancy correctly, not Calvinists you moron. THINK MORON, DO AS YOU SAY, RATHER THAN EXPECTING EVERYONE ELSE TO DO IT YOU LEECH WHO LEECHES OFF THE PROGRESS AND GAIN OF THEISTS.

"human rights abuse etc,"

WHERE ARE THE BRACKETS MORON AND THE COMMA YOU LAZY-MINDED MORON? LAZY, LIKE THIS!: (human rights abuse, etc.). THE MENTALLY LAZY ONE IS YOU YOU HYPOCRITE! YOU ACCUSATION-MAKING HATE-MONGER HYPOCRITE! SO, WHAT WERE YOU SAYING ABOUT MASS MURDERING ATHEISTS LIKE POL POT, STALIN, THE ATHEIST MURDERERS RULING CHINA, ENSLAVING CHRISTIANS WHO WON’T OBEY THEIR ATHEIST VERSION OF CHRISTIANITY (YES THAT’S HOW NUTTY AND ABSURD AND ABSURDLY STUPID YOU ATHEISTS ARE, MAKING UP AN ATHEIST VERSION OF CHRISTIANITY AND EXPECTING CHRISTIANS WHO LOVE GOD TO OBEY IT LOL!), SO WHAT WERE YOU SAYING ABOUT THEM, YOU SUPER IGNORANT WHO LIVES IN A BUBBLE MADE OF YOUR DUMB ARROGANT OPINIONS? Dummy! You deserve an eternity of persecution for your deliberate hatred of those your kind killed in the name of "progress" and "harmony" and "peace" and "unity" and "survival (of the pleasure-addicted atheist fittest)". WHAT GROSS DEATH-DESERVING HYPOCRISY!

"what can they believe in?"

Moron they can believe in having "fun" and massacring people like your group has for fun and gain and survival and peace and harmony like your group has been doing ever since you took over Russia and the countries around you which did not want to submit to your "non-beliefs" you opinion-bashing (opinions are beliefs you blind morons), guess-bashing "fact" bashing pseudoscience bashing, blank-mindedness bashing morons (and there have even and have been violent Buddhists, ironically, though not so ironic if you account for their combat training.)

AND WYNONA THEN SAID, IN HER SMUG MOCKERY, HER FALSE "OPINION" WHICH SHE CALLS SO AS NOT TO OFFEND THEISTS SO BADLY, BUT WHICH SHE CLEARLY IS TEACHING AS A FACT:" What will fill that void and make them feel safe like religion does?"

Well moron, you atheists have shown the world repeatedly!: LYING, STEALING, ADULTERY, MURDER, COVETING, IDLENESS, PLAYING VIOLENT GAMES, MASSACRING, MONEY, PETS, EVEN SEX WITH PETS AND INCEST! (MEANWHILE YOU DUMB HYPOCRITE ATHEISTS WHO KNOW THAT ADAM AND EVE’S CHILDREN HAD SEX WITH ONE ANOTHER SCOFF AT CHRISTIANS FOR IT, AS IF GOD ISN’T THE ONE WHO IS THE LAW-GIVER, AND LIKE YOU ARE THE LAW-GIVERS, YOU ARROGANT HYPOCRITES), ENSLAVING, SLAVE-TRADING, HYPOCRISY, PANDERING, BABBLING, BEING DISORDERLY, ACTING LIKE KIDS WHO HAVE BEEN RAISED TO BE IMMORAL, EVERYTHING THAT IS AGAINST THAT OH SO TOTALLY BAD "RELIGION" YOU DUMB DUMBS. Oh what is that I hear? "Well we didn’t say the whole Bible was wrong," That came a little late you morons. And like you really believe that it’s always wrong to steal, lie, commit adultery, or to hate anyone in your heart, or at all wrong to hate anyone in your heart, sure you do you hypocrites, you hypocrites, you hypocrites, you liars, you immoral liars, everything you say is untrustworthy, because you avoid and hate truths which go against your beliefs.

THEN MORON WYNONA PREACHED: "[Praaaaaaise Darwin, evolutionary Big Diggity Bang Bang Bang, BANG BANG BANG EVOLUTION ABIOGENESIS JUST BELIEVE! *flits hands about like some moronic child*...] It’s a scary thought, losing your comfort, part of your identity [Amen? (crowd of atheist replies, "Amen, praise Darwin, praise humanistic science sista],"

Your’re projecting Wynona, atheists, meaning, you morons are describing yourselves, but are, in your baseless pride, and ignorance, pretending that it’s everyone else who isn’t an atheist who is like that.

Then Wynona the sicko moron said: "so they attack atheists"

Say what about Pol Pot, Stalin, the atheist government of China, Vietnam, North Korea, etc. (I know you love that "etc.": it’s so convenient for lazy-minded morons like yourself, especially since you’re devoid of facts). And say what about Calvinists? Got any dirt specifically on them? Ignoramus Why Not Nona?

Wynona Etc. then said, "because they represent the threat of indpendent thought"

Ur so right moron Wynona Etc., atheists just came up with their thoughts all on their own (you moron), and no one on the planet is thinking on their own, everyone else is controlling their mind, but wait, THAT’S A CONTRADICTION YOU MORON, BECAUSE IF NO ONE WHO IS RELIGIOUS IS THINKING ON THEIR OWN, THEN WHO THE HELL IS THINKING FOR THEM SO THAT THEY HAVE BELIEFS, YOU MORONS? OH WAIT! YOU ARE THE ONES CONTROLLING OUR MINDS SINCE YOU ARE INDEPENDENT THINKERS RIGHT? RIGHT LOL? YEAH, SURE, SCIENCE TRIUMPHS WITH STEPHEN HAWKING’S AMAZING 200 POINT IQ AGAIN! GOTTA LOVE THAT ALL POWERFUL MAGIC 200 POINT IQ NUMBER THAT RUBY THINKS CREATES, SUSTAINS, CONTROLS, SOLVES, AND CAN DESTROY ALL THINGS.

And everyone, notice how these moron atheists keep saying that they are GUESSING, yet they immediately afterwards imply that their guesses are factual statements,and with smug "patronizing" insults on top of it; clearly they are confused ignorant idiots and hypocrites.

"independent thought", is not "critical thinking" (was that too hard to express you morons?) but is instead HATEFUL REBELLION, HATEFUL ISOLATIONISM. It’s rejecting good advice and help and God. That’s your "independance", your not depending on God, which is futile, since he sustains all things and is constantly helping you to live. But if you keep up your hate, that will end one day, and you will instead burn in Hell forever. Not only do you morons misdefine words, you misdefine phrases, like "critical thought". "Independent", what a laugh. Have fun in the middle of a hot desert without relying on the help of anyone or any living thing. Be free, be independant, go to Hell. Stop despising love, "Love one another", "Love your enemy", "Do good to those who persecute you", "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your mind [who came up with those laws, which atheists did not, and persecuted or pretended to truly be in favor of]. You do know what "love" is in the context of those sentences, right atheists? Learn what "love" is and BE loving before you continue to accuse all Christians of being hateful. Then, with the log of hatred removed from one of your eyes, you will be able to remove the specks in the eye of the ones you pretend to be helping with your hate.

If "independent thought" = and endless switcheroo of the definition of opinion, guess, proof, evidence, and reality, you can keep it. I’ll stay rational, as the word is defined by us Christians, with our dictionaries, and not your nonexistent ones (or are you gonna try and copy us on that too and pretend you invented the diciontary and all English words lol, oh wait, you’re already trying with Wickedpedia and wiktionary).

And don’t you atheists know, that you’re just so unknown, when Christians like me, are endlessly replying to and refuting morons like you, and publishing what you said and our replies, in books and on the web? I once met a moron atheist who said to me over msn messenger (in a very childish way, and grammatically bad, big surprise): "Christians are lazy because they have way more websites than atheists)", no doubt to us Christians because we’re not isolationist war-mongering lazy morons like you, and busy our selves helping others, including by publishing refutations of morons like you, which morons like you sometimes post on (yet you claim the sites are waste of time, so what are you posting on them for?). Instead your morons come up with sites like Yahoo Answers, which is a Trojan Horse for bashing Calvinists and anti-communists, which they use to flood the web by baiting Christians with endless pages of "questions" in the form of insults, or just plain statements, which the moderators ignore in their hatred of Christians. You lazy scheming cheats with your hidden agendas. Sure you’re "unknown". Sure you’re unknown when you constantly attack Christians on the web with potshots because you’re too lazy and hateful to fill the web with anything useful like we do. You insult us as being lazy for our hard work; you make no sense at all you backwards morons, none.

And despite your arrogant deliberate stupidity and hypocrisy, despite you being refuted all around you, you, idiot Ruby, have the mind to say, "Where Have All The Great Minds Gone?" You’re so right moron, there are no great minds around, not even Stephen Hawking’s, NOT EVEN YOURS. OOOPS AGAIN, YOU REFUTED YOUR OWN SELF. You sure love to contradict and defeat yourself.

No wait, you the moron, with your negative 200 I.Q. and head buried in the sand of your own opinions about how great atheists are (cuz they make ur heart feel good) and your nutty, horribly worded pretentious speeches, are to be believed about their being no great minds around. By the way do you know who invented that IQ intelligence scoring system you oh so love to endorse through your god Stephen Hawking? Do you know what his religious beliefs were? Did you know, moron, that Stephen Hawking said, in your precious A Brief History of Time (and it’s one of the most famous and quoted statements in the book): 

So long as the universe had a beginning, we could suppose it had a creator.
But if the universe is really completely self- contained, having no boundary or edge,
it would have neither beginning nor end: it would simply be.
What place, then, for a creator?

(pp. 140- 1)

SO MORON, NOT EVERYONE WHO CLAIMS THE BIG BANG AND EVOLUTION IS TRUE IS AN ATHEIST. STOP ASSUMING, IT’S STUPID.

Further. he is not sympathetic towards atheism. Now how do you feel about your hero, whom you slandered?

And how ironic, hypocritical, arrogant AND BIGOTED OF YOU to claim, that because Kirk Cameron doesn’t have an IQ of 200 or anything close to it, should not be heard, when you yourself are clearly a moron. SO EVIL MORON, YOU AND YOUR DUMB FRIENDS SHOULD NOT BE BELIEVED OR HEARD EITHER HUH? OOOPIE YOU FELL INTO YOUR OWN DUMB CONTRADICTORY PIT. FURTHER, SHOULD KIDS BE IGNORED TO YOU MORON? SO ACCORDING TO YOU MORON, KIDS SHOULD BE ABUSED AND NEGLECTED AND ONLY PEOPLE WHO ARE SAID TO HAVE VERY HIGH IQ’S SHOULD BE HEARD AND SHOULD RULE THE WORLD. YOU SUPER MORON! WHAT A SUPER MORONIC IGNORANT TEACHING!

THE FACT THAT YOU’RE ENDORSING HIM IN YOUR IMMORAL STATE AND STUPIDITY MAKES YOUR ENDORSEMENT SUSPECT YOU IDIOT! DUR! WHAT YOU DID IS LIKE HITLER ENDORSING STALIN AS BEING A GOOD MAN BECAUSE STALIN AGREES WITH HIM AND HITLER EXPECTING EVERYONE TO BELIEVE HIM. But maybe he was just hoping if he wasn’t as stupid as you.

On top of that Ruby, do you know what Stephen "200 IQ" Hawking’s  "greatest" achievement was according to the world? You should know since you  made it one of the center pieces of your rant against Christians. HINT: A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME. According to all the biographies on the web, it’s that book. And just how great is that book considered by people who are obviously wiser than you? Here’s one review from the anti-Christian dominated Amazon.com:

(1 Star Out of 5 Stars) 47 of 60 people found the following review helpful: A Poor Book, July 28, 2002 By     Andrew (England)

This is a poor book. Stephen Hawking knows his stuff, but he is very bad at conveying that information to others. He doesn’t go into enough detail to allow the user to understand the physics behind the subject and consequently the book has a very "so-there", "Because it just is!!" quality to it. For example, Early in the book he states that time moves slower close to the gravitational field of a large object, like the earth. He doesn’t go into any detail, or explain this. I know that it it because gravity and acceleration are the same, and as einstien showed, going faster causes time to move slower. But if I wasn’t familiar with relativity I wouldn’t have understood this, and wouldn’t have felt that I had learned anything. 

I hit problems at chapter 6, "Black Holes" because I know very little about them, and thus didn’t feel like could follow the chapter. The book has a reputation of being one in which people can’t get past the first few chapters. Well I think this is why.

A better example of a good way to learn a subject is through the books of Richard Dawkins. Upon reading his books I always come away with an excellant understanding of the topic. It’s a shame that this book wasn’t in a similar style.

(3 Out of Five Stars) 34 of 38 people found the following review helpful: Hawking is an Overrated Physicist/Writer, March 24, 2005 By     Anthony T. Lam "fisixguru" (Philadelphia, PA USA) – See all my reviews
   
Hawking’s story makes him a media favorite. The press (who know minimal physics if any) have for years given him the title "Greatest Physicist Since Einstein". He is an excellent physicist and a decent teacher but he is nowhere near being in the same league as Einstein, Newton or Maxwell. Paul Dirac and Richard Feynman are arguably the two most distinguished 20th Century physicists after Einstein. Ed Witten may be the most distinguished living physicist. 

Richard Feynman (through his lectures transcribed on audiocassette/text formats and books) is perhaps physics’s greatest teacher for the layperson and expert alike. Feynman had an unmatched knack for explaining high level physics in an original way. His "Lectures on Physics" is a classic and should be on the bookshelves of all physicists. Feynman’s QED is the best non-mathematical description of quantum mechanics ever (QED stands for quantum electrodynamics, for which Feynman shared the Nobel Prize). His book, The Character of Physical Law, covers much of the same material as Brief History but is much clearer and more insightful. You won’t have to unlearn anything from Feynman’s books even if you decide to pursue a PhD in physics. I cannot say the same for Hawking’s books. Read reviews on these and Feynman’s other works. Also, Feynman lived an inspirational and incredibly rich life. He had the brains of Einstein, the showmanship of a performer (which made him a great teacher) and just a great love and wonder for life in general. Read reviews on "Surely You’re Joking, Mr Feynman" and "Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman" for more details. You won’t regret it. 

For those who want to read about what many physicists view as the best candidate for a "theory of everything", read The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene. Hyperspace by Michio Kaku is another great book of the same vane. For those interested in a complete description of physical law, read the Road To Reality by Roger Penrose.

(1 Star Out of 5 Stars) 33 of 49 people found the following review helpful: "A publishing phenomenon", September 27, 2000 By Jeremy Dunning-Davies (Hull,England.)

Hawking’s book "A Brief History of Time" can rightly be termed a publishing phenomenon. But why? It is not particularly well-written, contains some poor English and doesn’t answer questions it poses early on. As a popular science book, it compares unfavourably with those of Paul Davies and, as far as the subject matter is concerned, "The Primeval Universe" by Jayant Narlikar covers the material much more lucidly. So what is special about this book? For some reason, which is not identifiable immediately, Hawking has become almost a cult figure. This is surprising since he works in a highly abstract area of physics which is not readily understandable to the layperson, except, possibly, as science fiction. It is also true that Hawking has been portrayed as the greatest British scientist since Newton. But is this true? Unlike the theories of Newton, those of Hawking have not been verified as yet. However, criticism of these theories is, on occasion, stifled. A case in point is provided by the Bekenstein-Hawking expression for the entropy of a black hole. A major objection to this is that it violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Papers raising this have appeared in the scientific literature and none has been challenged. However, articles have been rejected for publication purely on the grounds that the end result disagreed with Hawking. This is puzzling but it may lead some to feel that Hawking has achieved a status in popular culture which has influenced his scientific standing. If this is so, it is certainly not his fault but it is not a healthy position for science. In the end, though, the fact remains that this book is a real publishing phenomenon but not one which is justified by its contents.

And how do other books compare to his according to people more intelligent than yourself? Let’s  look!:

Reviews for the book Coming of Age in the Milky Way

(5 Stars) 2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
 I loved this book!, August 26, 2002 By Jessica Karas (OH)

One of the most enjoyable books I’ve read. Ferris has sparked my new-found interest in science and physics. I liked this book even better than "A Brief History of Time".

(5 Stars) No better book on the history of science, September 26, 2001 By  Kenneth Walker (Virginia Beach, VA USA)

Simply put, this is the best book on cosmology–in fact, the history of scientific thought itself–that I’ve ever read (and re-read!) Engrossing, poetic, insightful, with nary a math equation to get in the way, the book is breathtaking in its scope yet highly readable. Full of anecdotes about famous thinkers through the centuries, it leads the reader on an adventure into the minds of brilliant and eccentric trendsetters in science, while vividly presenting the ideas that changed our understanding of the cosmos.The author, well-versed in the latest cosmological theories as well as the historical precedences leading to modern-day science as we know it, presents it all with such panache that both the layman AND the scientifically astute will come away enchanted. Highly recommended for astronomy buffs as well as anyone interested in the fundamental foundations of science.

(5 Stars) 22 of 22 people found the following review helpful:  forget Hawking, July 9, 2001 By     Orrin C. Judd "brothersjudddotcom"

When Timothy Ferris decided to write a history of Cosmology he very nearly ended up with a book the size of the Cosmos itself. But for the final product, the result of twelve years of work, he pared three volumes of material down to a more manageable 500 pages. In so doing he has given us what must surely be one of the best books of popular science ever written. … (end of review)

Furthermore, unlike Hawking’s book, that book has a full five stars on Amazon.

 Better than a "Brief History of Time" Hawking, October 16, 2008 By     Jon Haas – See all my reviews
   
And here is a review for "A Guide to Quantum Living in the 21st Century":

(5 Stars) Better than a "Brief History of Time" Hawking, October 16, 2008 By  Jon Haas
Unlike Hawking’s( A brief history of time; also a great book) that can make this subject sleepy; Dr Stirt has made this subject matter easy to read and get into the minds of those interested in the great works of quantum physics without having a Doctorate. At the same time such a person familiar with the meaning of Hawking’s, Einstein etc… can use reflective perception to take Quantations’ thoughts where they want to. 
Once a reporter asked Einstein; if he "could sum up the theory of relativity in a paragraph or two". Einstein replied, "you would need to be a brilliant mathematician and then it would take at minimum a weekend to understand if you were really listening and working." Dr Stirt has introduced this subject to all to understand. You can enjoy several moments or days per page just thinking about his "quantations". A great book for all that are interested in the future of science. (end of review)

And yet A Brief History of Time is Mr, "200 IQ" Hawking’s greatest accomplishment. And in your massively dumb and ignorant mind, that trumps all the THOUSANDS of years of help Christians have ever done for the world, all the starving and needy people they helped and saved AND DIED FOR  OUT OF LOVE, AND NOT FOR FAME, and all the scientific progress they put in, INCLUDING THAT OF THE  "FATHER" OF MICROBIOLOGY, WHO WAS A CALVINIST. YOU ARE BLIND, WARPED, DELUDED AND COLD-HEARTED.

Can you figure out why Hawking’s book was so highly praised? IT’S BECAUSE HE WROTE IT WHEN HE WAS DISABLED YOU MORON, AND A PICTURE OF HIS DISABLED SELF IS ON THE FRONT COVER. NOW GUESS HOW THE MEDIA WOULD LOOK IF THEY PROMOTED IT MORON? THEY WOULD LOOK LIKE HOLY SAINTS AND LOVERS AND HELPERS OF THE DISABLED YOU GULLIBLE IDIOT. AND DO YOU THINK THAT PARENTS OF DISABLED CHILDREN, UPON SEEING A CLEARLY DISABLED HAWKINGS ON THE FRONT COVER, WOULD REALIZE THAT THEY COULD USE THIS BOOK TO INSPIRE THEIR OWN DISABLED CHILDREN AND TO SHOW THAT THEM THAT THEY CAN ACCOMPLISH "GREAT" THINGS LIKE HAWKINGS? DO YOU THINK THAT NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FOR THE DISABLED MIGHT ALSO SEE THIS BOOK AS A GREAT WAY TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DONATE TO THEIR ORGANIZATION SINCE IT DEMONSTRATES WHAT THE DISABLED CAN ACHIEVE OR THAT IT COULD BE USED TO INSPIRE THE DISABLED THEY ARE (OR SUPPOSEDLY ARE) HELPING? DO YOU THINK THAT THOSE PARENTS AND ORGANIZATIONS MIGHT THEN GIVE THE BOOK AN ARBITRARY FIVE STARS? DO YOU THINK THAT POSSIBLY HIS FRIENDS, BECAUSE THEY ARE HIS FRIENDS, MIGHT ALSO GIVE HIS BOOK AN ARBITRARY FIVE STARS, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE THEY FEEL SORRY FOR HIM BECAUSE HE IS DISABLED THE WAY HE IS? NOW HOW THE HELL WERE YOU NOT ABLE TO FIGURE SOMETHING AS SIMPLE AS THAT OUT? YOU’RE DUMB!

But what if Ruby is so dumb she thinks that I’m just saying that to make her look bad, well look what I found after writing the above Ruby (and try to notice how many people agreed with the review if you can):

(2 Out of Five Stars) 26 of 29 people found the following review helpful: Interesting but uneven and frustrating, April 4, 2003, By A Customer

Are the praises for this book really recognition of Hawking’s accomplishments or that he achieved them despite his physical infirmities [Well what do you know someone observed the same thing that I did Ruby!] ? I approached this book years ago and was swiftly and completely lost. Years passed and I found a wonderful (if dated) primer, Knowledge and Wonder by Weisskopf. My success in understanding K&W (I get quantum physics now and can easily explain it to others) convinced me to reapproach `Brief History.’

The book remains for informed insiders; perhaps not the inner circle, but definitely `you gotta know it to get it.’ Hawking consistently gives very short descriptions of theories that he then refers to throughout the text, but in ways that have little to do with the aspects he defined and in fact require more complete information. For example, I was frustrated trying to use his explanation of the theory of general relativity (p 30) in re: subsequent references. Luckily, in the years between my earlier attempt and this reading, the web has burgeoned and I was able to find a more complete and yet still brief but comprehensible explanation of this theory. And oh my goodness, Hawking now made sense. Obviously the connection is clear in Hawking’s mind, but it never made the transition to words on the page.

Despite all, I *did* get it. But unfortunately, rather than finishing with a desire to learn more I am just tired and glad to be done with it. I feel like I subjected myself to a badly presented lecture series.

Hawking’s writing is poor. Ideas ramble, tangential information occasionally takes over so the actual subject at had gets lost, recapitulation is erratic. Some of the self-references are conspicuously self-serving. True, for a scientist it’s decent, but the book’s writing should not be judged by a different standard than any other writing. That’s what editors are for, and apparently this book’s editor was so overawed by Hawking that he forgot to do his job.

This book should not be iconized. Nor should it be touted as accessible to the layperson. The information is interesting, but you have to want it and work for it. And when you’re done, what you get may not have been worth the effort you put in. It was for me, but just barely. (end of review)

And again what a hypocrite you are Ms. "Options", Ms. "Moral", Ms. "I’m Tired of Being Called Bigot and Told To Shut Up For My Beliefs (But It’s Okay To Bash Christians), yet you think Christians like Kirk and I should be silenced, and for, OOOOOH NOOOO POOOR PERSECUTED YOU, HURTING YOU BY PUTTING UP A VIDEO OF KIRK EATING A BANANA. You dummy, you whiner, you moron, you absurd hate-baiter, you lying hypocrite.

Now back to the rest of what Wynona said in one reply, a.k.a. Miss "etc.":

Miss Etc. then said, "and possible challange to one’s one religious beliefs."

Is that babble supposed to be a serious challenge to Christians? A challEnge, HINT HINT? No, you’ll never defeat us with stupidity, oops with "wisdom", oops, with "guesses" oops, with "opinions" oops, with "proof" (man when will you guys get your, uh, your categories straight?)?

OMG, I SUDDENLY FEEL FEAR! I’M, I’M, OHHHH NOOOO, I’M QUESTIONING MY BELIEFS! I’M LOOKING UP THE MEANING OF A WORD IN A VERSE I THOUGHT I UNDERSTOOD TO SEE IF I UNDERSTOOD IT CORRECTLY AND IF IT WAS MISTRANSLATED AGAIN! OOOOOO FREAAAAKING NOOOOOOOOOO, I’M SHAKIN’ IN MAH BOOTS! AAHHHHHHH, MY SHIELD, MY FALSE RELIGIOUS SHIELD IS DISAPPEARING BECAUSE OF THE QUESTIONING, THEEEE QUEEESTIONING, THAT DREADED QUESTIONING, NOOOOOOO IT’S "INDEPENDANT THOUUUUUUGHT, I’M MELTING, OH THE HORROR, THE HORROR OF QUESTIONING. *Puts hand on forehead and leans back as if to faint with eyes closed* and falls on bed. You morons. How can you be so stupid? So ignorant of the utter obvious and utterly common things that go on in the easily observed lives of everyone who is both religious and not? How is that possible except that you are disgustingly lazy and self-centered, unless you are IMMORAL, EVIL?

YOU ATHEISTS, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU, IS DUMB AND UNTRUSTWORTHY, PERIOD. EVEN TESLA DID HIMSELF IN, THAT "GENIUS". Despite having one of the greatest brains ever made, he became more and more of a self-obsessed vain monster.

As for your "What The Bible Really Says About Abortion (part 1)" post Ruby, clearly your not expert in what God says, but an expert in airing your own opinions. Stop cluttering the web with information that has already been posted, which is far superior to yours. Listen to that idiot who said it’s lazy to post so many sites, which is true in your case, since you rant when you write. And God has something to say about you quoting him, and your attempt to teach his word (yes, I’m going to quote the Bible! Oh, I guess that means I don’t have "independent thought, that must mean that neither does anyone else who quotes something it says which agrees with their beliefs, like, "forgive" and "MAKE A RIGHT JUDGMENT":

to the wicked, God says: 
"What right have you to recite my laws 
or take my covenant on your lips? 

You hate my instruction 
and cast my words behind you. 

When you see a thief, you join with him; 
you throw in your lot with adulterers. 

You use your mouth for evil 
and harness your tongue to deceit. 

You speak continually against your brother
Psalm 50:16-20

For those of you who are wondering why I wrote this reply with the anger that I did when what the people said on the sites I pointed out weren’t as bad as some other very bad sites (I can think of a few such sites), it was because of all the dumb comments combined, not just because of what they said by themselves, and because they supported each other’s stupid comments, so it was a "group rant" you could say. Atheists are organized when it comes to this: being stupid and supporting each other’s attacks against the religious (in general).

But God bless you evil ones, may he save you, I said a prayer for you, and will try to do so again. You need all the help you can get to survive among us mentally and spiritually fitter Christians.

More Evidence That Atheism Makes You Dumb and Destructive – PART 1

December 16, 2008 11 comments

This post is a reply to what was written on the websites thoughtzone.net/im-an-atheist-and-im-proud and thoughtzone.net/kirk-cameron-owns-stephen-hawking

Morgan Bell, on November 19th 2008 14:28 said:
"ill never understand why people think atheists are all in an organised group with some secret agenda?

silly sausages . . ."

Me (Knight): Why is there a question mark after your STATEMENT, you stupid sausage?

Second, why do atheists always take their own opinions like you did with the statement, "Sometimes I get the feeling that some people think that atheists should be seen and not heard."

which wasn’t even a statement making a claim that the feeling was correct, let alone backed up with evidence, AS EVIDENCE? YOU STUPID SAUSAGE? WILL YOU EVER UNDERSTAND THAT?

Third, are you a psychic to think you’ll never understand why you are a confused gullible slandering idiot, – and fourth point you’re – A STEREOTYPER YOURSELF, HYPOCRITE (by claiming that everyone says atheists are one group with a secret agenda). Now isn’t that ironic that you are the one making the misjudgment-about-group-mista ke?

Fifth: who the Hell, what Christian, you ignorant airheaded babbler, thinks that ALL atheists are one single ORGANIZED group? Can you punch yourself on your face very hard for me, for being such a dumb moron to say something that utterly lacking in common sense? How can you think, that everyone one on Earth, including other atheists (be more clear if you didn’t mean that too you moron) thinks that whoever doesn’t believe in God or gods, thinks that you’re all organized as one group, let alone with a secret agenda? Moron is everyone on the planet mentally joined so as to come to such a conclusion? Do you see any evidence that everyone is able to network like that in order to come to such a conclusion? Clearly not you idiot since no doubt you no that the world is divided not just by terrain but by hatred, weather, and lack of energy, transportation, and… GET THIS: BELIEFS! YES YOU MORON, DIVIDED BY BELIEFS! SO HOW THE HELL MORON, WOULD EVERYONE HAPPEN TO COME TO THAT SAME CONCLUSION, AND WHEN ATHEISTS ARE NOT IN THE TOP ONE HUNDRED MOST POPULAR THINGS TO TALK ABOUT IN THE WORLD IN GENERAL?

Sixth you massive idiot, hate monger, if you DON’T KNOW WHY ANYONE WOULD THINK OF ATHEISTS LIKE THAT, BY PUTTING A QUESTION MARK AT THE END OF YOUR DUMB GUESS, DID YOU RIGHT AFTER TURN IT INTO A STATEMENT OF FACT, AND ON TOP OF THAT, AFFIRM IT AS SO WITH AN INSULT ("silly sausages . . .", YOUR PATRONIZING STATEMENT)? Do you guess that you’ll never be able to understand that stupidity from your mind too, Morgan?

And I, a creationist and Christian and pro. researcher and pro teacher of the teachings of the Bible (no fluency in it’s original languages though) and an amateur historian will explain to you DUMB atheists who do not have those traits, why some people may think that atheists are one group with a secret agenda (and it’s obvious to your shame):

1. Kids with abusive atheist parents who want their children to fear atheists for the purpose of keeping them from becoming religious may teach them such a thing (and their are abusive parents who try to install fear into their children in similar ways all the time) could be fooled into believing atheists were peaceful and wise enough to accomplish high organization, especially if the children were poor and living under an extremely oppressive ATHEIST government like China, the former Soviet Union, the current atheist states that were one apart of Russia, and Turkey, which supposedly has Muslims in its government (if so they sure are massive infidel hypocrites to force secular laws on their citizens, and if atheists, then it just shows how stupid and confused and hypocritical they are too to claim to be Muslim).

2. If they were an atheist, as many atheists are so dumb (due to their forgetfulness of understanding why TRUTH is necessary for thinking logically and increasing your understanding, a forgetfulness caused by their massive self-centeredness and addiction to pleasure and hatred of pain, hence why they hate thinking critically, as the effort is mentally painful).

3. If you were poor and isolated like the starving people in North Korea (though I wouldn’t be surprised if many of them were secretly being helped by Christians from other countries, risking their lives to help them, and teaching them that atheists are too dumb, discontent and hateful to rule the world in harmony with each other) and were told propaganda that atheists were in perfect harmony with each other and control the world and if they did things without telling you why, like building a cellphone network while you were starving for food (which is being done now in North Korea). Governments, including atheist ones, use subterfuge let alone do things in secret all the time (but you forgot that in your obsession with your selves, your dumb opinions, and love of making dumb cheap shots in your mental laziness, rather than trying to be perfectly logical).

Incredibly, RubySoho replied to Miss Silly Sausage with: "Haha. I guess people are just used to placing people in categories?"

Hah, moron, why too did you put a question mark at the end of a statement you idiot? Are all atheists grammatically impaired? Second, talk about dumb: YOU TOOK HER MISTAKEN STATEMENT ABOUT YOUR OPINION BEING A FACT, AS EVIDENCE TOO! YOU WERE DUPED BY THE SAME MISTAKE SHE MADE! HOW STUPID IS THAT! TALK ABOUT DUMB! TALK ABOUT CONFUSED! TALK ABOUT SILLY! If I were in charge of putting the mentally ill into mental wards, I would have no problem with putting you atheists into one right away. That includes Buddhists, who think, lol, that by blanking their minds, they will learn something, LOL! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You’ logic, your priorities, your morality, are backwards in contrast to mine and whatever other Calvinists there are who are like or better than me.

Oh and how special, WOW, neato, ur atheist heart feels blah blah (more third grader, "Look at me guys" show and tell stupidity, you revel in that dumbness). Isn’t that neat kids? The atheist feels that non-atheists are stupid, and he, thinks he’s clever for asking why that is, and as if atheists were the first to invent mockery.I’m sure God was the first to mock, mock evil morons like you. "Hey look at my heart everyone, check out my dumb airheaded opinions, waste ur time listening to my ignorance everyone, my unfunny, unoriginal, boring sarcasm". Time-waster. A time-waster who demands you listen to his time-wasting, like you did with your, "Why is it that so many people think that atheists should only be seen and not heard"or something like that. Well can you figure out why now? BECAUSE YOU ARE ANNOYING, TIME-WASTING, UNFUNNY, MORONIC, UTTERLY STUPID WHEN IT COMES TO MORALITY, INCREDIBLY LACKING IN WISDOM SO THAT THE OBVIOUS REPEATEDLY SLIPS RIGHT PAST YOU WITHOUT YOU NOTICING, MASSIVELY SELF-CENTERED, MASSIVELY SIMPLE-MINDED, MASSIVELY SHALLOW, AND PROUD OF ALL OF THAT, ALL OF THAT IS SICKENINGLY ANNOYING, DEEPLY EVIL, AND ANYTHING BUT A GOOD WAY TO SURVIVE LET ALONE LIVE A LONG AND PEACEFUL LIFE. You are destroyers.

Who care’s if you are Ruby?, except other morons like yourself, and those who know you should be executed for being proud of your stupidity and wickedness? What a dumb person you are to childishly and boldly declare to the world you’re proud. You’re dumb, that’s what matters, and that you hate God and those who love him for no good reason. Take your useless destructive pride out of God’s universe before he sends you to Hell for it.

And you, RubySoho on November 19th 2008 14:33 said, "sometimes the only thing atheists have in common is that they are atheists….i also think they are a little afraid of us?"

…you put a question mark after a statement too. Truly you atheists are morons. Wow, this is one of the best evidences I have saved in my folder of how stupid atheists are and they are much worse at grammar than Calvinists.

And so being afraid of atheists causes a person to think of them as a highly or fully organized group with a secret agenda? The Hell? DUMB! … DUMB! DUMB! DUMB! ATHEISTS ARE DUMB!"

RubySoho continued: "Like what are we going to do, reason with them to death?"

…What a prideful arrogant moron you are to claim to be the ones who "reason". You disgusting evil slanderer, you are a MORON, not LOGICAL. Furthermore you moron, your group’s idea of reasoning is to BADGER A PERSON TO DEATH IF THEY DON’T GIVE INTO YOUR STUPID BELIEFS. You sicko, how dare you call your harassment, your slander "reasoning". If you don’t get forgiven of your sins you will be in for one Hell of a beating on judgment day for that sickening mockery. I will not feel bad for you at all to see you being beaten hard by Yeshuah for that evil mockery, not at all. You think it’s funny to inflict people with your lies, so don’t even think about asking Yeshuah for mercy or anyone else who loves him. No one will come to your aid when he’s beating you.

The silly moron, "Morgan Bell", on November 19th 2008 14:37, replied to what Ruby said, with

"well i guess that would be a far less painful way to go than being patronised to death!"

You mean like this you self-contradicting stupid hypocrite?:

"silly sausages . . ." – Comment about non-atheists (and by accident other atheists) by Morgan Bell on November 19th 2008 14:28, and which alt_ed, on November 19th 2008 23:34, made light of and justified, PATRONIZING non-atheists, by saying, See look at you two little hate mongers! "silly sausages"

The ones who patronize to death, if anyone, are you idiots. You idiots are the one who stress others out to death, including your own dumb selves and group with your evil behavior.

"I’m An Atheist And I’m Proud" written on November 19th 2008 23:10, by RubySoho:

RubySoho: "Sometimes I getthe feeling that some people think that atheists should be seen and not heard. 

Why is that?"

Because you’re an ignorant self-obsessed moron and/or met a few other morons like yourself who believed that, and wanting attention, being the vain idiot and no-body you are, decided to babble about it for cheap attention and praise, especially from morons like yourself.

RubySoho: "Why is it that religion is so widely accepted in our society that even religions that contradict each other are given equal time"

That statement is illogical, this is why: A WIDE amount (many) people accepting systems of worship (including the worship of self, or a dead man like Darwin, which an atheist could do while still remaining an atheist) has not been shown as a cause or the cause for religions being given "equal time" [to be taught]. In fact, you evil moron, RELIGION IS SHUT OUT OF ATHEIST DOMINATED COUNTRIES LIKE CHINA, TURKEY, AND THE STATES THAT BROKE AWAY FROM THE FORMER SOVIET UNION, AND MAYBE THE SOVIET UNION TOO, AT LEAST FORMERLY IT WAS THAT WAY IN THE SOVIET UNIION. IT IS EVEN RABIDLY SHOUT OUT IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN AMERICA AND CANADA, DESPITE THOSE COUNTRIES USING MANY BIBLE-BASED LAWS, due to the founders mostly being raised as Christians. Even founder Thomas Jefferson, though being a God-hater, endorsed many of the morals of the Bible (hypocritically however since he lied by denying other things it said). On top of that, Calvinists, of which there are over 60 million (whether they call themselves Calvinists or not, one who believes in predestiny is one), are heavily discriminated against more so than any other Christian, so that the equal time they get, if they do get equal time, is hard earned, even to the point of death.

RubySoho: "and yet atheists are expected to keep their lack of beliefs to themselves?"

Is that another guess moron, or a claim, you confused moron? You’re use of questions marks is nonsensical as is your logic.

AND MORON, YOU DON’T EVEN KNOW THE DEFINITION OF ATHEISM. LISTEN TO ONE OF YOUR OWN WHO REPLIED TO YOUR DUMB BLOG ON THIS PAGE:

Comment by Wynona Lavota on November 20th 2008 07:55: A-theism. An ‘a’ prefix means a lack of. ‘Theism’ is the belief in (a) creator/s of the universe. So, by definition, ‘atheism’ is a lack of religion. Anyone who argues otherwise is a tool."

You better not argue with her Ruby, though you’re already a moron. But we’re all tools Wynona, unfortunately some, like atheists, are used by Satan as tools for destruction, and fortunately, for those who love God, are used for reconstructing, repairing (or building new) good things.

And of course you have beliefs Ruby. When will you stop being stupid by obsessing on your stupid opinions all the time and only what agrees with them?

RubySoho: "Not every religion can be the right religion."

Class, who can correctly guess (and I know you love guessing) what would happen if you typed, "how can all religions be right" or "not all religions can be right" or "not all religions are right" into a search engine like google or ixquick? Yet dumb Ruby, on this page, said, "Like what are we going to do, reason with them to death?" Moron. "Like" "gag me with a spoon", what you idiots do, is repeat your stupidity and the obvious to people until they die prematurely from stress. You should have stated, Ruby, is "What we do is REPEAT FALSE LOGIC AND INSULTS TO PEOPLE TILL THEY DIE, WE TRY TO FORCE BAD REASONING ON THEM TILL THEY OBEY US, BECOME ONE OF US, OR DIE."

And RubySoho, yes, not all religions can be right, genius, but why do you imply that your beliefs, your philosophy isn’t something that can be found to be WRONG just like the other beliefs in the religion category? Why are you so blind, and biased, that you don’t notice the obvious like that? Moron: Not all BELIEFS THAT CONTRADICT EACH OTHER, can be right, it doesn’t matter, your hateful moron, you bitter moron, you self-centered moron, why are you only judging religious beliefs, and in bias, by implying they ARE ALL WRONG [MERELY BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT ALL IN AGREEMENT (YOU WERE TOO STUPID TO BE THAT CLEAR, I HOPE YOU APPRECIATE MY HELP)]? So your beliefs, atheism, atheist philosophies, atheist worship of Darwin or nature or birds, or whatever, doesn’t count or deserve to go under your atheists’ "reason"? Look up the definitions of "category" and "group" you morons, stop forgetting what they mean so that you stop forgetting how things relate to each other, like beliefs, philosophy, religion, atheists, and stupid hate-mongers.

RubySoho: ""Either Jesus is the Messiah or he is not."

Okay dummy! Figure it out stupid! No one is keeping you from making a sincere prayer like, "God, if you exist, and are truly good, let me be pleasing to you by acknowleding that Jesus is the Messiah if it is true then, I want to know the truth and adhere to it". Is someone stopping you you boaster of air from doing that? Is someone pulling your hands away from a keyboard so that you can’t type into a search engine, "Evidence that Jesus was the Messiah", "Proof that Jesus is the Messiah", "Evidence for the Bible", "Evidence for the flood", and so on? Evil moron, stop pretending to care about the truth, when clearly, what you want, is worship. You’re a vain idiot, who want’s undeserved worship.

RubySoho: "Either Jesus is the Son of God or he is not."

Look everyone!: RubySoho is "reasoning", he’s showing his intellectual genius with his logic-wrangling redundant babble. Neat: WE CHRISTIANS WHO HATE WASTING TIME LOVE YOUR FOR THAT RUBYSOHO! GOD KNOWS YOU DESERVE TO BE TREATED LIKE HIMSELF FOR THAT; THAT YOU DON’T DESERVE TO BE UGLY FOR THAT RUBY. NOT. I suddenly noticed how arrogant and hypocritical your user name is. Some "thought zone". Be accurate, it’s "Time-wasting anti-Christian babble zone,and truth-free."

RubySoho: "Either Mohammed was given the final revelation or he was not."

Mr. Lazy Fingers and Mind: http://answeringislam.org

Thank me stupid, and thank them, for, unlike you, not pretending to care about the truth, not being lazy, but caring and being hard-working.

RubySoho: "Yet, there are literally hundreds"

Yawn.

RubySoho: "of religions that believe varying degrees of the above and we are told that we must respect them all."

By hypocrites like you, for example on Atheist Answers, I mean Yahoo Answers, when pretending to be good people, in order to annoy the Christians away and to death, in their gross unjustified hatred of God. Example of certain atheists on Yahoo Answers and Answerbag: "Now now you Christian, respect all beliefs equally, don’t be intolerant bigots" (atheists then press report button in hypocrisy and disrespect for the Calvinist or other kind of Christian opposing them in hopes that an anti-Christian moderator will punish that Christian).

"That makes no sense to me."

So stop, as a group, as the anti-Christian group, pushing that "tolerate all religions" with that hypocritical secret agenda to get rid of the Calvinist Christians and "fundies" stupidity. It’s not Calvinists preaching it you idiot,so stop stereotyping us the non-atheist world as tolerance pushers. And that just goes to show further how utterly ignorant with regard to the Bible and religion you are, as HARDLY ALL people on the Earth teach to tolerate all beliefs. How ignorant! How unjustifiably ignorant of you to not notice how divided the world is. Yet you moron atheists or agnostics, gave this blog a high rating! THAT SHOWS HOW DUMB ALL OF YOU ATHEISTS OR AGNOSTICS ARE (including the ones who were too lazy and envious to give this blog a high rating, or who for some other reason didn’t but would have).

RubySoho: "If Jesus was the Messiah then Judaism is wrong and Jews should convert to Christianity.

BUT OBVIOUSLY MORON (I’M DEFINITELY YELLING NOW MORON) "JEWS" DON’T ALL BELIEVE THAT JESUS WAS THE MESSIAH, BECAUSE MOST OF THEM ARE DUMB LIKE YOU. DUR. THANK YOU MR. OBVIOUS FOR WASTING MY TIME AND THE TIME OF THE WORLD WITH YOUR WORTHLESS POINTING OUT OF THE UTTER OBVIOUS.

RubySoho: "If Gabriel did indeed command the illiterate Mohammed"

He wasn’t illiterate you gullible anti-fact, anti-careful researcher. CAREfully look for the truth about that. Go to answeringislam and look that subject up. Stop assuming, and contradictorily so: If the religious are liars why did you easily believe whatever Muslim, or idiot parrot, when they parroted that Muhammed, was illiterate?Dumb.

RubySoho: " to read then Christianity is wrong and Christians, along with the newly converted Jews, should convert to Islam."

You sure love to smother people with yourself.

RubySoho: "But that is just the tip of the iceberg."

Say what about atheists not "reasoning" people to death, Morgan? And so RubySoho, your genius self has given us now, the grand revelation that the utter utter obvious (and lie about Muhammed’s ability to read) is JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG PEOPLE! WOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOWEY! THE SKY IS FREAKIN FALLIN PEOPLE! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!! JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG THAT IF JESUS IS THE MESSIAH THEN JEWS SHOULD WORSHIP HIM! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOO, FREAKIN TIP OF THE ICEERB THAT GRAND REVELATION AND THAT THAT’S ONLY THE TIP OF THIS INCREDIBLE GIANT ICEBERG OF AMAZING AMAZING SUPER AMAZING EXCITING GROUND-BREAKING CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS SHAKIN’ THIS IS! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO FREAKIN WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. LET’S GET OUTA DODGE AND START MINING FOR GOLD IN THE YUKON LIKE RABID FREAKIN’ DEER ON CRACK MY PEOPLE OF THE WORLD!!!

You’re a third grader, raised by idiots. You must have gotten picked on tons. You’re clearly too ignorant to make any decent intelligent friends, Or were you blessed enough to live near a pandering Christian dupe who helps you out now and then so that he himself can earn your worthless praise?

RubySoho: "Each of the "great" monotheistic religions has scores of denominations, sects and sub-sects. All of which preclude and contradict the other. They cannot all be right. Which means most, if not all, are wrong."

Gives you a big atheist-learned "YAWN" AND "RANTING" though mine are justified unlike theirs. And stop repeating you idiot. You atheists love to insult Christians with "yawn" and "rant" and "I didn’t ask for a lecture" yet look at this hypocritical ranting.

RubySoho: "And yet,"

Why did you put a comma after "yet"? Did you want us us to know that you were having a hard time completing your thought at that point? Thrilling.

RubySoho: "I am told that I must respect them all.

Why?"

Say what about being deluded and babbling about yourpersecution/victim syndrome? Only in your head is the whole world telling you to tolerate everything but atheism. Hey, I just realized another stupid thing about you atheists: You claimed non-atheists thought that atheists were a group with a secret agenda, yet you approve of this moron RubySoho’s clearly stupid and wrong claim about the whole world telling him/you that you should tolerate everything but atheism and to be silent, Talk about "dumb". Morons, IT IS THE WORLD THAT TELLS CALVINISTS TO TOLERATE EVERYTHING BUT THEIR OWN CALVINISTIC RELIGION. AND UNLIKE YOU MORONS, WHO HAVE NOTHING TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIMS, I DO, AND THIS PAGE ON WHICH YOU MORONS RANTED CONTRADICTIONS ON, IS ONE OF THEM.

Stop seeking vain attention. The evil persecutors are self-centered people like you, everyone but (in general) Calvinists. The best atheist I met, FOR NO GOOD REASON, stopped talking to me after MONTHS of me being ONLY friendly to her. No explanation as to why she stopped, though kept me on her messenger. Which is bizarre on top of not talking to me.

RubySoho: "People often accuse atheism of being a religion."

Me Christian ACCUSE atheism of being a religion. Oh wow ur right. The world does do that. Not. The truth is that some Christians accuse anti or non-Christian Darwinists and Liberals of adhering to the religion Darwinism and/or Liberalism depending on what either group believes. You are the one who is "accusing" Ruby; it’s all of you idiot atheists and anti-Christians who are the ones who do so; you take after your Father Satan, The Accuser.

RubySoho: "Well we know that can’t possibly be true."

Rolls eyes.

RubySoho: "Because people respect religion.

1) That is a sentence fragment: "Because" should not be capitalized, and there should be no period after "true" rather, a comma should be after it (hey don’t complain moron atheists, you’re the ones who when a Christian makes a grammar or spelling error, pounces on it like it was an asteroid-sized chunk of gold).

2) That sentence fragment, if combined with the previous sentence, makes no logical sense. How does knowing that atheism is not a religion is true a result of people respecting religion? Mr. Logical? Mr. Stephen Hawking Has An I.Q. of 200 Therefore He Knows Everything Perfectly and Kirk Cameron Is Dumb, can you explain why I’m wrong? Or is your I.Q. not high enough, Mr, Stephen Hawking Has An I.Q. of 200 Therefore He Knows Everything Perfectly and Therefore Kirk Cameron Is Dumb Because He And His Friends Recognized The Obvious Which Moron Hawking Denies: That Bananas Are Designed Objects Which Were Ingeniously Made For Easy And Safe Consumption, Which Morons Like Hawking, With Their 200 Point I.Q.’s And Clever Technology and Jokes, Still, And Never Will Know, How To Build. He and no one else, except God, can create a "simple randomly evolved banana" not even one. Just to even get close you need a dna sequencing machine, and have to copy the original DESIGN, not RANDOM JUMBLE OF STUFF.

RubySoho: "And atheism does not command such respect."

Yet another sentence fragment: *Shakes head in disapproval.* Use correct grammar if you want people with "200 I.Q.s" to elevate you to their level of fame and lavish their morally worthless praises on you. But remember what Dumb Dawkins said, "We got dat greeday jeans, dem jeans make us selfish." So maybe they’d keep you down in the ditch where you are now out of their greed for more glory.

RubySoho: " It seems that us atheists are fair game to be derided, scorned and belittled. 

In other words:

"Eh hem eh hem my good fellows, it appears that the opposition thinks that we are fair game, oh how rude, Bartholemew II and Sir Witherspoon-Golddigger, would you be so kind as to pass me the gourmet tea and crumpets I ordered from France using one day shipping yesterday?"

You’re a pretentious moron. You are no genius, you are not witty man, you are no high class person, you’re a moron third grader pretending to be those things, and doing a terribly embarrassing job at it. Hint you idiot: Using uncommon words, you dumb dumb moron, does not make you a wise or smart person in morality, religion, or philosophy. It shows you to be an uncaring person, as you are for no reason lobbing uncommon words at people other than to show off, and take advantage of their dumb belief that people who use "high" words, like your Stephen Hawking or Darwin, neither of whom you come close to in eloquence, must be wise. Dumb moron, if I used those words (and my grammar is clearly superior to yours, and I clearly have a higher literary IQ than you), but instead attacked atheists in place of the religious, would that then make me a wise person too? No moron. But you’re to busy wafting your smelly opinions around for worthless praise to notice obvious errors in your logic like that, that using high words makes you wise is wrong, 

RubySoho: And we are told we cannot speak up."

Knight: Yet another sentence fragment. So much for dramatic effect, moron. And who the Hell is telling you that you can’t speak up you stupid idiot? Not 60 million Calvinists you moron, we tell you to speak up so that we can know if you have stupid beliefs or not, if you SHOULD be shut up and avoided or made known and helped.

This is how dumb you sound to me: "Hear ye hear ye fellow atheists, for we are told that we cannot speak up. (crickets chirp in the background and there is a long long silence, as the pathetically small crowd of atheists before Dumb Thoughts Zone awaits his next dumb sentence, and hoping it will actually make sense this time.)

RubySoho: Because if we speak up we are called bigots"

Bigot. Stereotyper. Discriminator. God-hater. Truth-hater. Christian-hater. Calvinist-hater. Bitter, jealous moron, hate monger, liar, hypocrite.

RubySoho: and hate mongers and liars.

Why how did you know that Martin Luther King?

RubySoho: Merely discussing our (lack of) beliefs is called attacking religion."

Say what about your beliefs about all religions being evil and destructive except for worship of those who love or endorse you for believing that and your belief that you are a morally good person)? Or do you seriously expect intelligent people like me to believe that you are blank-minded? That is pretty close to the truth though, ignorant air-head.

RubySoho: " Well I am tired of being told that I have no morals."

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, boooo hoooo. The bitter self-contradicting insano is tired of being told he’s immoral. MORON MORALS CAME FROM GOD, YOU MORON, NOT ATHEISTS! What a massive moron.

RubySoho: " That I don’t feel compassion."

Cold-hearted snake, where is your concern for the persecuted Christians of the world, that self-agrandizing sickos like you, who make up your own convenient rules SUITED FOR YOUR HEART which you call "morals" and "ethics" KEEP TORTURING AND MURDERING? ATHEISTS YOU EVIL IGNORANT, HAVE KILLED AND MURDERED MORE PEOPLE IN THE PAST 100 YEARS, IN LESS THAN 100 YEARS, THAN EVIL CATHOLICS KILLED IN 1000 YEARS! YOU INSULT THE CHRISTIAN BABIES AND KIDS AND THEIR PARENTS AND ALL CHRISTIANS WHO HAVE GONE TO HEAVEN BY THE HANDS OF SICKOS LIKE YOU, WHO DO EVIL, THEN WHINE ABOUT BEING PERSECUTED FOR IT. YOU TRULY ARE A CHILD OF SATAN.

RubySoho: " That I am devoid of humanity."

Your’re devoid of basic grammar skills you moron. It reflects how obsessed with yourself you are, and your bad logic. It reflects how confused your mind is that you keep making so many half-sentences.

RubySoho: " Just because I don’t believe in God."

SENTENCE FRAGMENT.

RubySoho: "" No more. 

No more what you moron? Fix your grammar idiot. It’s hard enough replying to your cracked up thoughts let alone replying to them.
 
RubySoho: " I’m speaking up."

Well big woopty doo. The boring, dumb, ignorant, is speaking up people. Yay. Freakin yay. Bluuuuhhh, lets, get, oooowwwt, (voice slows even more and becomes more depressing sounding) theeeeeeeeerrrrr, puuuuuuunnnchhhhh. (Says with a super bored voice:) Let’s party: He’s speaking up.

RubySoho: " I don’t believe in God."

Wooo freakin woooo everyone, the dumb bumb leech doesn’t believe in God, and has no beliefs, freakin exciting and new, lets go to CNN with this, freakin wooo (a kazooo is blown in the background with a sad and fading tone at the end). The room is silent as Ruby takes five minutes to continue his "ground-breaking speech".

RubySoho: "I think people deserve to know all the options before they make up their minds."

Oh ur so freakin right, no one knows a freakin thing about atheism (exscept atheist morons like yourself), Britain only about half-atheist now, atheists, like you and your moron friends, only harass endlessly (even to death) in court and illegally outside of court against Christians in every country where there are atheists living among Christians. China sure doesn’t have an atheist government, the former states of Russia sure don’t have any atheists in their government, there sure was never an atheist Stalin who murdered tens of millions of people for being religious or not obeying his agenda),which you’ve repeatedly demonstrated is your/his version of "options" (you sickos). And not that all agendas are bad you sickos (yet another Satanic attempt to misdefine or reverse the meaning of a word to confuse people to death, like you did with other words, like "love"). You’re not only ignorant of what happens to today, but in the recent past.

RubySoho: " And I won’t be told to shut up."

Let’s see if that thought even comes to your mind on the Day of Judgment; you’ll be shitting maggots in your nonexistent pants even before it’s your turn to be beat and scolded 100 feet into the ground, then picked up by your feet and repeatedly smashed on it, then bound in chains and thrown into Hell where you can babble all you want (unless the pain gets too bad).

You don’t want to shut up huh? Well than don’t complain about that God said:

By myself I have sworn; from my mouth has gone out in righteousness a word that shall not return: ‘To me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear allegiance.’ (Isaiah 45:23)

Out of your mouth will surely come an oath to obey God, whether you like it or not, Mr. No One Can Shut Me Up. And if you don’t repent, you’ll never be able stop screaming from pain.

RubySoho: " I am an atheist."

And you’re an immoral babbler too. What about boaster of ignorance?

 And I am proud."

I’m proud too, proud that I know and understand God, and love him, not proud for being a blank-minded moron like you.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 53 other followers